Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCustomerDrivenService.10-11.4thQtrTangible Result: Current Overall Rating of This Result: Measures (with desired trend and ultimate goal / benchmark) Measure Workload Indicators Measure Timeliness Index Current State (should be Descriptive and\or A3Visual) for each measure Measure Workload Indicators Timeliness Index Fair Records Requests Council Inquiries* Code Violations Reported Nuisances SF Residential Permits Records Requests Council Inquiries* Code Violations Reported Nuisances SF Residential Permits Records Requests Council Inquiries* Code Violations Reported Nuisances SF Residential Permits Records Requests Council Inquiries* Code Violations 4QTR 903 26 NO DATA 945 11 100% 46% 0% IX.Customer Driven Service Desired Trend DECREASE ▼ DECREASE ▼ DECREASE ▼ DECREASE ▼ INCREASE ▲ Desired Trend INCREASE TO FLAT INCREASE TO FLAT INCREASE TO FLAT INCREASE TO FLAT INCREASE TO FLAT Trend INCREASE ▲ DECREASE ▼ INCREASE ▲ FLAT FLAT DECREASE ▼ no data Progress N/A Y N N Y N N Historical Average Benchmark 1 0.7 N/A N/A N/A Rating/Comment Recently added PD and Court data - no comparisons available Change in staff resulted in no data collection Nuisance violations increase over summer; compared to same pd last yr, complaints up 6% INSIGNIFICANT CHANGE - Seasonal pattern Normal Operation Work load Change in staff resulted in no data collection Goal 1 1 1 1 1 Red Yell Y Green G G G G Champion: Implementation Plan (Green=Task On Time/Ahead - Yellow=Task Running Behind - Red=Task Late - X=Milestone Date) # 2 3 4 1 Recent Progress 1 City staff are managing the current workload well but there are ample opportunities to improve quality, cost and efficiency. We were laboring first to develop reporting procedures that will enable us to identify trends. The recent focus has been on the re PRIORITIES & Status 1. Improved evaluation/measurement of code/nuisance enforcement activity 2. Centralize records request activites 3. Plan to assess CS quality through survey component Leader GC & DEPTS GC-NB GC-NB GC-NB Modified Inspections/Planning division reporting procedures to include code enforcement workload and efficiency data CONRAD/BRENNAN Evaluate measurement methods Records requests are processed city-wide. Additional recordkeeping work will likely force City Clerk to delegate more tasks. Assess available metrics with comparison data, select those applicable to tangible results, review with management, plan to implement Tasks FEB - determine workload overflow, develop submission procedure, additional steps as necessary. DevelMAR - Begin collecting city-wide data. JUN - Determine next steps APR- Review metrics available with comparison data, select those applicable to City goals and tangible results. Write RFQ-MAY, post/select vendor JUNE, distribute survey by SEPT APR - Online Pay soft launch, MAY - Promote online payments, Review data for impact AUG JUN - Evaluate measurement methods, determine next steps (recent personnel changes in Inspections) Submitted: 9/16/2011 Milestone Dates Jan 4. Analyze utility data for online service impact ADMINISTRATIVE PRIORITIES Feb X Starting after online payment begins 1. Data focused heavily on workload. For more value from this exercise, we need more data related to the efficiency and quality of our customer service activities. 2. At the start, discussed smaller data items "rolling-up" into broader indeces. What is our plan for this? EX: Instead of reporting violations and nuisance, we report on complaints in general. Mar X April X X Data for: May X X June X X X July 4th Qtr 2010-2011 Aug X Sept X Oct Nov Dec