Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-13-2002 � ':� h � I �.i : . a .� � � : � � June 13,2002 �� ;� ; � t� >� ' � � To the Honorable Mayor and Council N � Of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri � � I � Gentlemen: � The Planning and Zoning Commission met Wednesday, June 12, 2002. By � � majority vote, actual vote counted and in the file, we act and/or recommend as ! � � follows: a 1,� '� � ; � � 1. That the request of Gary M.Arnold for a Special Use Permit for a model home � � at 2493 Cheetah Lane in an R-1, Single Family Residential District, be � � $y recommended for approval for a period of 24 months from the issuance of the ` {� Special Use Permit. The vote on the motion to approve the request was 11 in ; favor and none in opposition. There were no citizens present in opposition to � � � this request. � � � � >0 2. T'hat the request of Walter and Sheila Rasmussen for a Special Use Permit for a ( `� group home daycare at 2740 Adeline Avenue in an R-1, Single Family � Q Residential District be recommended for disapproval. The vote on the motion � � to approve the request was none in favor and 11 in opposition. The applicant � was not present and no citizens were present in opposition to this request. •� ; '� 3. That the record plat of Cape West Village Second Subdivision be recommended for approval, contingent on items indicated in the staff review � letter being resolved prior to forwarding the plat to City Council. The vote on "� ; the motion to approve the plat was I 1 in favor and none in opposition. There � were no citizens present in opposition to this development. � � 4. T'hat the record lat of Hillcrest Place 2nd Subdivision be recommended for P ' approval, and that review fees be paid prior to forwarding the plat to City � Council. The vote on the motion to approve the plat was 11 in favor and none in opposition. There were no citizens present in opposition to this development. 5. That the record plat of B and E West Third Subdivision be recommended for , approval. The vote on the motion to approve the plat was 11 in favor and none � � in opposition. There were no citizens present in opposition to this I ;� ��- development. � � 6. That the record plat of Kessinger Subdivision be recommended for � disapproval, since the plat did not meet criteria set out in the Subdivision �. Regulations. Also, items in the staff review comments had not been � , � addressed. The vote on the motion to approve the plat was none in favor � and 11 in opposition. There were no citizens present in opposition to this � ! development. � ,� � � Honorable Mayor and City Council June 13,2002 Page 2 7. That the record plat of Brookshire Estates Fifth Subdivision be recommended for approval contingent on items indicated in the staff review letter being resolved prior to forwarding the plat to City Council. The vote on the motion to approve the plat was 11 in favor and none in opposition. There were no citizens present in opposition to this development. 8. That the preliminary plat of Melrose Place Fifth Subdivision (with the Lisa Drive connection) be recommended for disapproval. The vote on the motion to approve the plat was 5 in favor and 6 in opposition. There were four citizens present in opposition to the connection of Lisa Drive. 9. That the preliminary plat of Melrose Place Fifth Subdivision (without the Lisa Drive connection) be recommended for approval contingent on items indicated in the staff review letter being resolved prior to forwarding the plat to City Council. The vote on the motion to approve the plat was 7 in favor and 4 in opposition. There were for citizens present in support of this development. 10. That the record plat of Melrose Place Fifth Subdivision (with the Lisa Drive connection) be recommended for disapproval. T'he vote on the motion to approve the plat was 4 in favor and 7 in opposition. There were four citizens present in opposition to the connection of Lisa Drive. /� 11. That the record plat of Melrose Place Fifth Subdivision (without the Lisa Drive connection) be � � recommended for approval contingent on items indicated in the staff review letter being resolved prior to forwarding the plat to City Council. The vote on the motion to approve the plat was 7 in favor and 4 in opposition. There were four citizens present in support of this development. Respectfully submitted, � � � �-�. homas C.Holshouser Secretary Present: Rediger, Cox, Holshouser, Blank, Buhs, Eaton, Haubold, McKinney, Rhodes, Smallwood, Williams C T