HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-15-1991.Snags Delay Projects at AirportSnaggy delay projects at Cape T-iunicipal airport
Steel beams for T -hangar
Workers Tuesday unload steel beams that airport Improvements, the Federal Aviation Ad -
will be used In a new T"hangar building at the ministration will fund only 35 percent of the $1
Cape Girardeau Municipal Airport. With other million project, less than officials expected.
Fingers pointed
at bureaucracy and
capricious weather
By Jay Eastllck
Staff Writer
Bureaucratic snags and un-
cooperative weather have forced
delays in capital improvements
projects at the Cape Girardeau
Municipal Airport this year.
Airport Manager Mark Seesing
said a terminal building renovation
project. T -hangar and taxiway con-
struction, and an airport signage
project all have been delayed by
unforeseen obstacles.
Seesing said the Federal Aviation
Administration has said it won't
pay as much of the $1 million ter-
minal building project as city offi-
cials expected.
The final plans for the innovation
project were apgroved months ago,
but since then the FAA has agreed
to fund only about 35 percent of the
project.
"Initially we were informed that
they would participate on more like
46 to 50 percent," Seesing said.
"This came as a blow to the con-
tract and what we were planning to
do."
See AIRPORT, page 4
Airport From page I
Scesing said he had planned to
The FAA Only will
bid out the project the fust of June.
"Now I have no idea what the
fund Public access
schedule is," he said.
areas of the terminal
Scesing said the city will submit
amended renovation plans to the
building.
FAA in hopes the agency will agree
to fund a greater portion of the pro-
nearly complete with the exception
jecl. He said much of the area
of minor "touch-up" work on sane
designated in the original plans for
of the signs, Scesing said, He said
future airline development were
the 13 mandatory -instruction and
deemed unnecessary by the FAA.
29 direction signs are installed and
The FAA will only fund "pubfic
operational.
access" areas of the terminal build-
But runway 2/20, recently
ing.
marked as part of the signage pro-
Seesing said other items in the
ject, must be repainted because the
renovation project were excluded
new paint has started to "blister,"
from FAA funding, including a
Scesing said.
' baggage -check area; the airport
Despite the unexpected snags,
manager's office; two hallways; a
Scesing said he hopes to finish the
businessmen's public office area
airport projects this year, although
complete with such items as a fac-
later than planned. He said he also
simile machine, telephones, and
has submitted preapplication docu-
compuler terminals; and a confer-
ments fa next year's capital im-
ewe room.
provement projects.
Seesing said an amended floor
The projects include a fire -
plan eliminates the conference
protection water system and m -
room and the additional airline
alignment of a parking lot entrance
space. Only one commercial air-
mad
- line, Trans World Express, serves
Funding for airport
projects
the airport, but city officials are
planned for 1993 and
beyond could
trying to bring additional airline
be jeopardized by saggmg airport
service to the city.
boardings. If the airport dips below
"The plan we submitted was a
10,000 annual enplanements — a
growth plan where we could intro-
target barely reached last year —
duce new airlines without extensive
the city stands to lose $300,000 in
renovation," Seesing said. "But we
annual FAA entitlements for airport
will need to submit a Floc plan of
improvements.
only what's needed now.
The boardings this year are about
"We really wanted to have what
600 less than the totrd last year by
we drew out originally because
May. Scesing said that if boardin s
that's what we were trying m do as
drop below 10,000 the city would
far as airport development."
lose its "primary airport" status and
Seesing said he hopes to learn
be considered a "commercial ar-
- within a couple of weeks whether
port,"
the FAA will agree to fund more of
But he said there may be funding
the project based on the amended
sources other than federal entitle -
floor plan.
menu for the airport improvement
The new T -hangar is expected to
projects. A pilot state -block -grant
be finished soon, but Seesing said
program in Missouri provides
taxiway spas that will connect the
financing for some projects at com-
hangar to the mnway ramp have
mercial airports, Seesing said.
been delayed indefinitely because
"For special projects, we could
of unstable soil conditions. He said
wind up getting more money" than
the T -hangar building arrived Tues-
through the federal entitlements, he
day and likely will be erected in
said. "The problem is that projects
less than two weeks.
like the terminal building are a low
"The taxiways are in a sate of
priority. Things like runways are
limbo right now for the T -hangars
high priority.
that will be built in 10 days," Sees-
We could ask for a 7,000 -to-
ing said.
8,00q -fon runway and get it by as -
The airport manager said he's
king once." he said. "I begged for
waiting for an engineer's report on
six months to get a terminal build -
possible solutions to the wet sub-
ing."
grade soil conditions. He said the
Seesing said that although state J
wet conditions, made worse by
funding is available through the
relentless May rains, won't meet
pilot grant program, Cape Dow -
the FAA's compaction require-
dean would compete for the funds
ments for the taxiway spurs.
with many other commercial air.
Seesing said correction of the
pats in the state.
sub -grade problems might be ex-
"Being a larger airport inside that
pensive.
category gives us probably a better
T6 .;rSAA e, norma mm.mm ,e
.. ...x.",. a...A:...."r.-" M
MEMORANDUM
TO: Cape Girardeau Airport Advisory Board
FROM: Mark J. Seesing, Airport Managerrl(�
DATE: May 16, 1991
SUBJECT: Follow Up To Newspaper Article Published May 15, 1991
As indicated in the May 15 article, the FAA has backed off on
the participation level for the terminal building. When the
preliminary plans were first taken to the FAA, it was shown to have
a split of 45percent federal, 54 percent local share. After
several more months of planning and designing, we met again with
FAA on April 18. At this meeting Mr. Doug Johnson of the FAA's
Airports Division informed us that upon review of the preliminary
drawings the FAA has determined they will participate at only a 35
percent level.
Mr. Johnson advised that several of the areas we felt were
public access areas did not fall under their guidelines as public
use, these areas being:
1.
Airport
Manager's office.
2.
Conference
room.
3.
Office
services area.
4.
Baggage
room.
5.
Storage
room.
In a follow-up meeting in Kansas City on May 1, Mr. Stoverink,
Mr. Leslie, Mr. Belzer and myself convinced the FAA to participate
in the office services area and the storage room but could not sway
them on the conference room, Manager's office or baggage room. As
a result, we have gone back to the drawing board to better depict
just what we need at this time and not what we would like to have
for future development.
This new floor plan will be developed and submitted to the FAA
for their review. It is hoped they will see that the increased
square footage to the lobby area will increase their obligation to
50 percent or more of the total building and concede to the
original plan and funding levels.
Some of the information brought out in the article was a
little misleading as to what was exactly said in the interview.
The FAA funding for the other projects is still at the 90/10 level.
'�- This includes airfield signage, painting of runway 2/20, and the