Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil.Agenda.01-19-2021.PacketBob Fox, Mayor Dan Presson, Ward 1 Shelly Moore, Ward 2 Nate Thomas, Ward 3 Robbie Guard, Ward 4 Shannon Truxel, Ward 5 Stacy Kinder, Ward 6 January 19, 2021 5:00 PM Teleconference via Zoom City Hall 401 Independence Agenda Documents, Videos Minutes, and Other Information: www.cityofcape.org/citycouncfl The following considerations have been made to aid in the prevention of community spread of COVID-19 and all respiratory viruses. The City Council plans to meet by internet teleconference via Zoom. • Citizens that wish to view the meeting without speaking for or against an item may watch the live stream of the meeting at Youtube.com/cityofcape. • Citizens that wish to speak, in the virtual meeting, must register via Zoom by 4 p.m. the day of the meeting. The registration link is on cityofcape.org/council • In-person meeting participation has been temporarily suspended Invocation Pastor Phil Roop of Bethel Assembly of God, in Cape Girardeau Pledge of Allegiance Study Session No action will be taken during the study session Presentations Communications/Reports • City Council Staff Items for Discussion • Planning and Zoning Commission Report • Appearances by Advisory Board Applicants • Appearances regarding items not listed on the agenda This is an opportunity for the City Council to listen to comments regarding items not listed on the agenda. The Mayor may refer any matter brought up to the City Council to the City Manager if action is needed. Individuals who wish to make comments must first be recognized by the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem. Each speaker is allowed 5 minutes. Please face and speak directly to the City Council as a whole. The Mayor and Council Members will not engage or answer questions during the speaker's time at the podium. The timer will sound at the end of the speaker's time. After all members of the public have appeared, the City Council may respond and discuss issues that were brought forward by the speakers. • Agenda review Regular Session Call to Order/Roll Call Adoption of the Agenda Public Hearings Appearances regarding Items Listed on the Agenda Individuals who wish to make comments regarding items listed on the agenda must first be recognized by the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem. Each speaker is allowed 5 minutes and must stand at the public microphone and state his/her name and address for the record. The timer will buzz at the end of the speaker's time. Consent Agenda The Consent Agenda is a meeting method to make City Council meetings more efficient and meaningful to the members of the audience. All matters listed within the Consent Agenda have been distributed to each member of the Cape Girardeau City Council for reading and study, are considered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion of the council with no separate discussion. Staff recommends approval of the Consent Agenda. If separate discussion is desired, that item may be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda by request of a member of the City Council. I. Approval of the January 4, 2021, City Council regular session minutes and closed session minutes. 2. BILL NO. 21-02, an Ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute a Special Warranty Deed to Legacy Vacations LLC, for property located at 725 Independence Street, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Second and Third Readings. 3. BILL NO. 21-03, an Ordinance annexing land into the city limits of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, located at 4178 State Highway K, upon the request of Christian Faith Fellowship. Second and Third Readings. 4. BILL NO. 21-04, an Ordinance amending Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, by zoning newly annexed property, located at 4178 State Highway K, as C-2, Highway Commercial District. Second and Third Readings. 5. BILL NO. 21-05, an Ordinance extending the boundaries of Ward 6 to include property newly annexed into the city limits of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Second and Third Readings. 6. BILL NO. 21-06, an Ordinance appropriating funds related to the Committee for Affordable Technical Education, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Second and Third Readings. 7. BILL NO. 21-07, an Ordinance appropriating funds related to the 2020 MAGNET contract for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Second and Third Readings. 8. Bill No. 21-08, a Resolution of official intent of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, toward the issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds to finance an Industrial Development Project and authorizing certain actions relating thereto. Reading and Passage. 9. BILL NO. 21-09, a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Tyler Technologies, Inc., for software hosting services, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Reading and Passage. 10. BILL NO. 21-10, a Resolution authorizing an application to the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission for the 2020 Transportation Alternative Program Grant, for pedestrian improvements within the City, and authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary grant program documents. Reading and Passage. 11. Approval of the Partial Release of Performance Guarantee Agreement for Southeast Health West Campus. Items Removed from Consent Agenda New Ordinances 12. Bill No 21-11, an Ordinance authorizing the issuance of Special Tax Bills on properties for the closure of dangerous buildings, and for the abatement of nuisance, under the provisions of Chapter 17 and Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. First Reading 13. BILL NO. 21-12, an Ordinance amending Schedule C of Section 26-121 of the City Code, by adding stop signs at various locations, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. First Reading. 14. BILL NO. 21-13, an Ordinance amending Schedule F of Section 26-247 of the City Code, by establishing no parking anytime at various locations, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. First Reading. Appointments Other Business Meeting Adjournment Closed Session The City Council of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, may, as a part of a study session or regular or special City Council meeting, vote to hold a closed session to discuss issues listed in RSMo. Section 610.021, including but not limited to: legal actions, causes of legal action or litigation, leasing, purchasing or sale of real estate, hiring, firing, disciplining, personnel issues, or confidential or privileged communications with its attorneys. Legal actions and litigation, confidential communications with legal counsel, property transactions, and personnel matters, pursuant to RS Mo. Sections 610.021(1), (2), and (3). Memos • Appointment to the Tree Board • Appointment to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Advisory Board Minutes 0 Advisory Board Minutes Staff: Bruce Taylor, Deputy City Clerk Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT Approval of the January 4, 2021, City Council regular session minutes and closed session minutes. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: ® DRAFT 2021.01.04 Re¢ularsessionMinutes.pdf Minutes 2021-01-04 regular session DRAFT Regular January 4, 2021 LL -1 STUDY SESSION — January 4, 2021 NO ACTION TAKEN DURING THE STUDY SESSION The Cape Girardeau City Council held a study session on Monday, January 4, 2021, starting at 5:00 p.m. with Mayor Bob Fox presiding and Council Members Robbie Guard, Stacy Kinder, Shelly Moore, Dan Presson, Nate Thomas, and Shannon Truxel present via Internet videoconferencing (Zoom.us). REGULAR SESSION — January 4, 2021 CALL TO ORDER The Cape Girardeau City Council convened in regular session on Monday, January 4, 2021, at 5:54 p.m., with Mayor Bob Fox presiding and Council Members Robbie Guard, Stacy Kinder, Shelly Moore, Dan Presson, Nate Thomas, and Shannon Truxel present via Internet videoconferencing (Zoom.us). ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA A Motion was made by Dan Presson, Seconded by Shelly Moore, to adopt the Agenda. Motion passed. 7-0. Ayes: Fox, Guard, Kinder, Moore, Presson, Thomas, Truxel. Richard Payne, Chairperson of the Committee for Affordable Technical Education appeared in support of Bill 21-06. He reported on the purpose of the Committee's request for funds and responded to questions from City Council Members. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of the December 21, 2020, City Council regular session minutes and closed session minutes. BILL NO. 20-183, an Ordinance amending Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, by changing the zoning of property located at 2979 Beavercreek Drive, in the City and County of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, from R-1 to R-3. Second and Third Readings. BILL NO. 20-184, an Ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a State Block Grant Agreement with the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission to fund air service promotion and marketing, at the Cape Girardeau Regional Airport. Second and Third Readings. BILL NO. 20-185, an Ordinance approving the record plat of Cape West 17th Subdivision. Second and Third Readings. BILL No. 21-01, a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Nip Kelley Equipment Company, Inc., for the Water Plant No. 1 Filter and Secondary Basin Rehabilitation Project, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Reading and Passage. DRAFT Regular January 4, 2021 LL -2 Acceptance of public improvements to serve Behavioral Health Hospital. A Motion was made by Dan Presson, Seconded by Shelly Moore, to approve and adopt. Motion passed. 7-0. Ayes: Fox, Guard, Kinder, Moore, Presson, Thomas, Truxel. BILL NO. 20-183 will be Ordinance No. 5369; BILL NO. 20-184 will be Ordinance No. 5370; BILL NO. 20-185 will be Ordinance No. 5371; and BILL NO. 21-01 will be Resolution No. 3374. Q W',W1 C 1 IT .10QW BILL NO. 21-02, an Ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute a Special Warranty Deed to Legacy Vacations LLC, for property located at 725 Independence Street, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. First Reading. A Motion was made by Dan Presson, Seconded by Nate Thomas, to approve. Motion passed. 7-0. Ayes: Fox, Guard, Kinder, Moore, Presson, Thomas, Truxel. BILL NO. 21-03, an Ordinance annexing land into the city limits of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, located at 4178 State Highway K, upon the request of Christian Faith Fellowship. First Reading. A Motion was made by Dan Presson, Seconded by Robbie Guard, to approve. Motion passed. 7-0. Ayes: Fox, Guard, Kinder, Moore, Presson, Thomas, Truxel. BILL NO. 21-04, an Ordinance amending Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, by zoning newly annexed property, located at 4178 State Highway K, as C-2, Highway Commercial District. First Reading. A Motion was made by Dan Presson, Seconded by Nate Thomas, to approve. Motion passed. 7-0. Ayes: Fox, Guard, Kinder, Moore, Presson, Thomas, Truxel. BILL NO. 21-05, an Ordinance extending the boundaries of Ward 6 to include property newly annexed into the city limits of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. First Reading. A Motion was made by Stacy Kinder, Seconded by Shannon Truxel, to approve. Motion passed. 7-0. Ayes: Fox, Guard, Kinder, Moore, Presson, Thomas, Truxel. BILL NO. 21-06, an Ordinance appropriating funds related to the Committee for Affordable Technical Education, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. First Reading. A Motion was made by Robbie Guard, Seconded by Shelly Moore, to approve. A Motion was made by Stacy Kinder, Seconded by Shannon Truxel, to amend the appropriation amount from $20,000 to $10,000. After discussion, the motion to amend failed by roll call. 3-4. Ayes: Kinder, Presson, Truxel. Nays: Fox, Guard, Moore, Thomas. Motion to approve without the amendment passed by roll call. 4-3. Ayes: Guard, Moore, Thomas, Fox. Nays: Kinder, Presson, Truxel. DRAFT Regular January 4, 2021 LL -3 BILL NO. 21-07, an Ordinance appropriating funds related to the 2020 MAGNET contract for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. First Reading. A Motion was made by Dan Presson, Seconded by Stacy Kinder, to approve. Motion passed. 7-0. Ayes: Fox, Guard, Kinder, Moore, Presson, Thomas, Truxel. APPOINTMENTS Appointments to the Cape Girardeau Area MAGNET Board of Directors A Motion was made by Dan Presson, Seconded by Shannon Truxel, to appoint Mayor Bob Fox and Council Member Robbie Guard to the Cape Girardeau Area MAGNET Board of Directors for terms expiring December 31, 2021. Motion passed. 7-0. Ayes: Fox, Guard, Kinder, Moore, Presson, Thomas, Truxel. Appointment to the Planning and Zoning Commission A Motion was made by Dan Presson, Seconded by Robbie Guard, to appoint Sid Whittington to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a term expiring November 1, 2024. Motion passed. 7-0. Ayes: Fox, Guard, Kinder, Moore, Presson, Thomas, Truxel. MEETING ADJOURNMENT A Motion was made by Dan Presson, Seconded by Robbie Guard, to adjourn from regular session and to convene in closed session for legal actions and litigation, confidential communications with legal counsel, and personnel matters, pursuant to RSMo. Sections 610.021 (1), and (3). Motion passed. 7-0. Ayes: Fox, Guard, Kinder, Moore, Presson, Thomas, Truxel. The Regular Session ended at 6:41 p.m. Bruce Taylor, Deputy City Clerk Bob Fox, Mayor Staff: Kelly Green, P.E., City Engineer Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT An Ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute a Special Warranty Deed to Legacy Vacations, LLC for 725 Independence Street in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The attached ordinance conveys property located at 725 Independence Street, to Legacy Vacations, LLC Cape Girardeau, Missouri. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The property at 725 Independence was identified as surplus property that could be sold. A Special Warranty Deed has been prepared for this purpose and is attached. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute a Special Warranty Deed to Legacy Vacations LLC in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: D SWD Legacy Vacations 725 lndependence.doc Ordinance D Special Warranty Deed(Corporation) RTF! 20217951.pdf SWD & closing docs BILL NO. 21-02 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED TO LEGACY VACATIONS LLC, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 725 INDEPENDENCE STREET, IN THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1. The Mayor, for and on behalf of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, is hereby authorized to execute a Special Warranty Deed to Legacy Vacations LLC, for property located at 725 Independence Street, in the City and County of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, more particularly described as follows: All that part of Lot Forty (40) in Range "B" in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of said Lot 40, Range "B"; thence West 30 Feet; thence South 104 feet; thence East 30 feet; thence North 104 feet to the Point of Beginning, Also, Part of Lot Forty (40) in Range "B" in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the South side of Independence Street 30 feet West from the Northeast corner of said Lot Forty in Range "B"; thence run West along the South line of Independence Street thirty feet; thence South, parallel with Ellis Street 104 feet to a Private Alley; thence East, parallel with Independence Street 30 feet, and thence North, parallel with Ellis Street, 104 feet to the point of beginning. Also the use of use of Eight (8) feet left between the above described tract and the Southern boundary line of said Lot 40 as a Private Alley for the joint use of all the owners of Lot 40 in Range "B„ In addition, the City Manager is authorized to execute all accompanying documents. ARTICLE 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten days after its passage and approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 2021. Bob Fox, Mayor ATTEST: Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk SPECIAL WARRANTI DEED THIS REED, Maaei and entemia into dliis ��rl y ofDlecemben, X020, by and between CITY G F CAPE GIRARDL14 V, MIS SC URI, a Munici&il Corporiailion, organised am eximling umeri the lawsi of the States of Missouri, with its principal (fficei ;in the County) of Cape Ginarideau, State ofMissouri, parity cf the fitimi paiiil, ana LEGA CNVACATIONS HIC, of the County of Cape Ginarde ciu, State of Missiourli, parity an pantie s (f the se Gond part, (Mailing adariess of staid fiirst namiea grandee isi 834 Alta Visita D fMet, Cape Giinardeiaui, MIO 63210k. W1ITNESSEAHb shat the saia parity on pantie s of the firist part, fori and ;in cionskh nation (f the sums of 6 n Doillari ($1.00) and oilheii valuable ciansiiaeniatiom paid by the said parity oni parties of Me siecond part, the neicieipt of whicili pis heniebyl acknowledged, doesi by these pniesiena BARGAIN AND SELL, CONVEY AND CONFMIM undo Mei siaia parity or parties of the siecond part, the following desicirided Reiail Esitate s ituattia in the County) cf CAPE GIRARDE14 14 and State of Missiciuini, jlo wit: All that f ad of Lot Flodty (40) in Amge "'BI'"I in the City of Capei Gidarideaui, Mkssouirii, desicdibed asi follciwsi: Begin at the northeaist cornea of said Zlcit 40.1 A angle "B"; th 6 ce1 91 st 30 feet,; thence South 104 foe ie 1, it, ence East 361 f eet; th en ce North 104 feet to the P bin t of Be gill, r in g. Also, Plant cf Lot Fodty (4 t 1 in Rlad ge "'B "' in the City of Cape Gidardeaui,, Mimouiri, described ass follows: Commencing at a point cin the south snide of Indepen die nice i Streiet 30 feiet Wesitfriom it, ii noritheasit coruf er of mijid Zlot Fcidty in Rladge "B"', thence ruin West along the siouth line of Independence Stdeet thidtyfeet; then ae South, parallel with Ellis Sheet 104 feet it a PHvateiAlley,; thence East, parallel with In def en die incei Silreeit 30 feet, an d they cie North, parallel with Ellis Shieet, 104 feiet jlo the f oInt of begins Vin g. A lso jhe use of Rgh jl (8) feieit left llefuleen the a Moves desicribed hiact and 4 a siauithern boundary line of mijidilot 46I asi a DiivateiAlley foci the joint ume of ahl of the onnem of Llot 46I in Rlangei lilh I l". TO HAVE AND X HOLD the siamie, to&dller with ail) rlightsi ana apfluntenanceis to j1he same llelonging, undo the sciid party) ori pariliesi of the se cions Ilanit, and to tlhe he irsi and asslignsi of mcill party) ori L Iglihes i folie w n, The slaia panty orlanticls of tllel firsltpant hclrclly cove inanting that said panty orlantiels am the he,insl, executonsl and adrr iinistratons of sluch panty orllantiels, slllaIl and wJjV MRRANA AND DEFEND thcl tide iso the) pmlrr Jsclsl unto the sada panty orllantiels of llhel slecond parlll, and the helins ana aslslagns cf mxh party) an pariticlsl forcluen, against Mel lawful claiimsl of aM pclrslonsl claire ing by, thriaugh an unacln party) cf thcl fnslll parlll but nand othcln excepting, however, thcl generiail taxers for the calenaar year) 20 and thelreafierl, and spciclial ilaxesl becoming a ilieln after) the date of tAis deed IN W1 VESS WHERECF, ilhe saia panty of tAcl fiirslt panty has eauslea llheslcl pmesclnlls to bel signed by its) Mayors and gills corpanate sclaJ to )lel helneunto affixed. S7t4TE CF MJSSOURI SE CITM G F CAPE GIRARDEA" MIS SC URI COUN77H C F CACE GIRARDEA U } On tlllisl d y cfDleeemlben, 2t26� befom me, gLreaned Ilob Fox, to me plcmionailly known, wllcl lleing try me du ly slwonn, diia say chat he pis l the Major of CJ TY C FI CAPE GIRARDEA UI AMISSOUM, a Mia n icipal Coqclnaticln of the Stwe ofMisslouni, ana thw staid iimitrlumenll mcel sligrleld in tlellclilf of staid city Ily cluthcn;ity of Jai City Ccluncid, curd sada CITY OF CAPE GIIBAIRDEA[A MISSOURI aekr cwledgc d said instrument to Ile the frc e cict and ae ea of staid cILIY� LIYGIlhcln. IAI AE67YMOAIYWHEREOF, llllave hcreuntcl stet my Kana clnd affxcd my c �icJal seal tin llhc Courity ana Sllate Me day clna yc clr f u stl atlave wr,illte n. My 7knm Elzpiir est: a AMANDA L. MCKINNgN Notdry Rut tic - Notary Sleal STATS OR MISSOURI Crape Ginanc eau Caur ty My Comlmissior 9xglires Manch 3, WIM Cammissiarl #145881913 A. S0111em FIII t Statement U.S. Depart Inert oil Housing OM B D a. 7107-0265 and UI Ian Davelopmanl B. type of Iloan 1. ❑ HHA 2. ❑ FmHA 3. ❑Conv Unins 6. File Number 1. Loan Number S. Mortgage Ins Cm a Num1 or 4. ❑ VA 5. ❑ Con h1. 6. ❑ Sallor Fiamlca 20217911 7. 01 Casl Sale. C. Note: This form is furnished to give 71cu t statement of actual sattlomant casts. Amounts paid to and 13 it a settlement at eat are shown. Items marked "( .e.a.)" were aid outside the closing; the are shown hero for informational purposes and are not included in the totals. D.1, amu & Address a f Borra was E. Name & Address of SellerF. Name & Address of Lender Legacy Vacations ll I The Ol all (lope Ginandoau, Missauui G. Hraparh Location City a II (tape Clira rdeau, Lot 40, Blool B 121 ludeneacleneo Gage Clivaudeau, MC] 1131101 Adjustments Marl items unpaid bll sellar H. Settlement Agent Name Cape (lirarilenn (Il Altotract and Title Comgaryl, Ina. 1051. Bwmlaiew Cape (lira riles i, M(I 63701-0078 Tax ID: c13-0321181 Undimnitten Hal: Commonwoald Place of Settlement (lope(lirandanu Ca unq All stns at and Title( ctmgan)l, Ina. 105 9 . Braadaiew Cape Girardeau, M(I 63701-0118 I. 9 ettlerlant Date Fund: A Si armsry o1 BAnaomieo's Tuansastion K. Summary of Seller's Inn usactian 100. Gnoss Alms tint Duo tram Bonnowen 100. Gnoss Alma tint Dun to 9 ellan 101. Contrast 1 alas Prise assets" 1101. Contract Sales Arise 91.1,600.00 102. Personallraparty fas" 1 j0 agonal Property 101. Sattlement Charges to 1 arowmr T T i 403. 104. 404. I0:1. 40:1. Adjustments fns items paid by sullen in aduanan Adjustments Ilan items paid by sullen iu f dna nae 106. Cil property taxes 406. City pronert) taxes 107. County property taxes X107. Cotmq property taxa 101. Alsassmant Taxer 1101. Alseismnnt Taxes 109. School property taxes 409. School psogertl taxes 110. Clther taxes y `41 ter taxes 111. MUB Taxes g ■ I BRI I -o jDTaxes Ill. 112. 115. 1411. Adjustments Marl items unpaid bll sellar 116. 1116. 110. Gross Almaunt Due Fnam Bdroowma 420. (Inass Almaunt Duo to Sellen $14,600.00 100. A Imountn Paid By (Ir in Be] oll Clf Bmmawor 100. Rednetians in Alpo unt Due to Sellen 101. Deposit ar tamest money 101. Excess Deposit 702. Principal amount a I now loan(s) Onst I j'&0 ellement Olarles to Saller(liae 1400) 101. Existing loan(s) taken subjeat to s 10'.x: ExistingLoan(s)TalanSubjaatto 104. Loan Arrlount Ind Linn 104, Payoffoll Hrst mortgage loan to 105. 10:1. Payoff oil socandmortgagelem to 106. 106. 107. 107. 208. 108. 209. loll. Casl AltSettlementTo/FrainSelle■ Adjustments Ilon items unpaid by sellar Adjustments Marl items unpaid bll sellar 110. City property taxes 110. City property texas 111. County property taxer II11. Connq property taxes 112. Assessment Taxes 1112. Asmisr int Taxa 113. Salton I property taxes 113. SehaaIproperty taxes 114. (Ithartaxis 114. (Iltanes 215. MU D Taxes 115. MUD Taxes 816. 1116. 217. 117. 218. :118. 219. 119. 220. Total Paid By/For Bonraeiei1 520. Total Reduction Amount Due Seller :10.00 300.Clasl At SettlementEmonLrIoBariiomiinn loll. Casl AltSettlementTo/FrainSelle■ 101. Glass Amount due from borrower (line 13 0) 1101. CA ss Andonnt dua to sellar (line 420) 914,000.00 302. 1 est amaunts paid by/for 1 orrawer (line 320) 1102. 1 ess reduatianl in amt. dua miller (line 320) $0.00 303.0s) Fram Bernowma 603. Clasl To Sellar 114,600.00 Seition 1 of elle Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act(RESPA) requirr. the Section 4(a) oil R1 SPA mandate[ ttdat HUEI develop and prescribe this standard lollowing: • HUE must deitnlop a Spatial lrlhmationfloellet to Ielp persons farm to to used at tHafma afllsml settlement to provide full disclosure ofall itmga burrowing manell to 0nanei the purahme ell resideatial real estate to tartar imposed span tilt tarownnr am cl sailer. These are t1ird pert) disclosures dlat we understand it enatt re and casts oflreal estate sanlemast sinimm designed to provide the Ix rrowir will pnrtlneat infirmafan duaing tl c settlement • Ent landar mist provide the boot lit to all tppliaants 6mm wlam it racei,es at ihr lmanss in orderto l e abettarsl oppar. wham it prepma a"min applanation to l oraai moneq to license the pulcl asa ail Tie Publia Rellorting Burclan for this calleition a inihmation in atinlated to residinfal real estate; • Landers must prepmo mid dlstril ute %4tH the Bool let a avertgo sna hour par response, inaluding the time for reniawng instraVrtons Goad Haith Esfmate of the sattlonlent casts tHat ddo 1 answer is lil ely to incur in somal ing enisting data sources, lrthering and maintaining tl a data need d, and ca nna ction watt d e seulemant. Tease disclosures ma nlandata rl. aomplef nl and rn oie wing ttdi colle etio n a l in forme tia n. Tl is agonc7l mall not callant this inbmatian, and you tis nat mgt uad to complete delis Ile m, w lass it dlsplvis a cureml)l ua lid (M sentolnumbar. Tie info mason rl questa d does not land itse ll to as nllcimmality. Pnniiaw Editicas ars (Ib solute ltge 1 lorm HUD -1 (3/ild) Handback 4105.2 Filet, o. 201119:11 L. SattlemeatClaugas 100. Total Sales/Buokau'sCommission based angniae DitisionollComnlissian(lin1700)anfollows: 101• to 107. to Iaid From Paid From Banowrrls seller's Ft rids at Bundl at settlement Eetllemont 103. 800. (tams Payable in (lannaalion will I can E01. La an Origination Bee % to E03. Loan Micount fi to 803. Appraism IFaa to 804. Cradit Report to 8119. Lender's Inspection Bac to 806. Mortgage Insurat co Application to E77. A ist mgtion Fee to 818. Flood Carlification Fen to 900. IN ms Required by Landau To Bo Paid in Adaanae 901. Utorest grain to @$0/day 903. Iv orlale hlmranae Premium for months to 903. HazardIrsurannegremium.loryears to 1000. Reserves Depalited Witt Lender 1001. Har ard insuratica manta a @ per moral 1002. Mortgage insure no a montls@ per mantl 1001. CitygropeM taxos ntonda a aw!m _ rLnonth 1004. County propertl taxes moans @ r f tj ✓ilk onth 100'.1. Assossnlent Taxan mond s @ par mantl 1006. Sul oal property tanes montls @ per mantl 1007. MUD Taxes montl s @ per moral 1008, Otlartaxas months @ per mond 1711. Aggregate Adjustment 1100. Title Charges 1101.Settlemantoralosinl Ilre to Cape Girardeau(launtl AtatraatdiTitle (Io. 1101. / t straat at title semal Title to (tape Girardeau County Abstract Title CIO. F 1101. Title Search and E)iamination Fan to in'� �'R • 1104. Title insurance I indar to 110:1. Danumeat preparation to 1106. Notary I6ns to 1107. Attorney's Ines to (includes at one items mlml en: ) I I(8. Title insurance tc Cape (lirardei it Count] Atstraet & Title Co. (includes at of a items m mben: _ ) 1109. Lender's coverage 90.00/90.00. 1110. Ownnrla coverage $14,1100.00/927.44 an ■ an ■ tare ■ 1111. Bsorovulke to 1112. Qlatingl Proteation Letters to Cape Girardeau County Abstract & Title (lo. 1700. ( It va ra me nt Aeeondin g it a d TuariIna (Iha rg es 1101. Recording Fe as Daed91'1.01 ;Martingo ;Rol to 1102. City/county tax/stamps Deed : N ongale to IIIJI. State tax/stamps D -I ; N orggt a to 1I04. Adclitianalilacardiaplees to 1300. Additional 9ettlemantClorgies 1:101. Survey to 1192. lest Inspection to 1103. Courier Fee to 1400. Total Settlement Charges (antaa an lines 103, Snatien J and 501, Section HI) I ht ve oarellully revicwed tl a HU D-1 Settlement Statement and to al a best of my I nawledga and f, it is a true and acct rata statement of all receipts and disbursements made on my aaaount c r 131 me in tl is transeation. I flahor let tifJ tl at I have eive a wragleted oc p1l oil gapes 1,1 and 1 oltl is HUD -I 9etllement Statemwt. Th ttyop C e Gir eau, Missouri SETTLIIMI NT AGENI CERTBIRIATIGN The HUD -1 Settlement Statement whiah 11; ua prepared is a true and acdura y aaaaunoa t olthis transaction. I hava r sed the ikinds to ba disl urged in acoardanae Hith tl in statement. Settlement Agent Date Moaning: It is a an into to 4 nowingly mal a false statements to tl a Unitad States an tl it or ai 31 other aimilm Ibrrm. 8analties upon aonuiotion tan include a Mae and imprisonment. For dotaih .Ica: Title 18 U.J. Code 9eation 1001 and Section 1010. 8 reuioun Editions am Ot salata Paga 2 '.brmi HIUD-1 (3/811) Handbook 41113.2 Staff: Ryan Shrimplin, AICP - City Planner Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT An Ordinance annexing land into the city limits of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, located at 4178 State Highway K, upon the request of Christian Faith Fellowship. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The attached ordinance annexes the property at 4178 State Highway K into the city limits. A public hearing was held on December 21, 2020 to consider the proposed annexation and zoning of the property as C-2 (Highway Commercial District). Ordinances for the zoning and ward boundary extension for the property are on this agenda as separate items. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On November 16, 2020, the City Council acknowledged receipt of an annexation petition for the property at 4178 State Highway K. A public hearing was held on December 21, 2020 to consider the proposed annexation and zoning of the property as C-2 (Highway Commercial District). Ordinances for the zoning and ward boundary extension for the property are on this agenda as separate items. FINANCIAL IMPACT Annexing the property will generate additional revenue for the City in terms of taxes and fees, which will be used toward the cost of providing City services to the property. SUSTAINABILITY: ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS Annexing property is necessary for the orderly growth of the City. By annexing and zoning properties such as this, the property owners and the community as a whole will benefit from regulations intended to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the ordinance annexing the property at 4178 State Highway K. PUBLIC OUTREACH Notice of the City Council's public hearing was advertised in the Southeast Missourian on December 6, 2020. In addition, a sign containing the date, time, location, and subject of the public hearing was posted on the property. Name: IDescdption: ® 4178StateHwy=K Annexition_Ordinance.doc Ordinance D MaI- 4178_ State_HiehwayK Annexation.12d 14178 State Highway K - Annexation Map BILL NO. 21-188 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING LAND INTO THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, LOCATED AT 4178 STATE HIGHWAY K, UPON THE REQUEST OF CHRISTIAN FAITH FELLOWSHIP WHEREAS, Christian Faith Fellowship has presented to the City Council of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri its Verified Petition requesting annexation as the owner of all fee interest of record of a certain tract of land which it proposes to be annexed to the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on December 21, 2020, after due notice was given in accordance with Chapter 71.012 RSMo.; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, all interested persons were allowed to present evidence regarding the proposed annexation; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the annexation is reasonable and necessary to the proper development of the City and, further, that the City has the ability to furnish normal municipal services to the tract to be annexed within a reasonable time; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the tract proposed to be annexed is adjacent to and contiguous and compact with the existing corporate limits of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and further, the tract proposed to be annexed is in an unincorporated area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1. The corporate limits of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri shall be extended so as to annex the following described unincorporated tract of land which is adjacent to and contiguous and compact with the existing corporate limits of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and so as to extend the limits of the City over said tract as described herein below, to -wit: WEST TRACT: All of that part of Lot No 2 of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 30 North, Range 13 East of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the County of Cape Girardeau, State of Missouri, described as follows: Commence at a found sandstone, (3" x 5"), marking the intersection of the North line of said Section 3, it with the West line of United States Private Survey No 3090, thence with the North line of said Section 3, North 89 degrees 00' 00" West, passing a found sandstone at 803.50 feet, a distance of 1668.59 feet, to the place of beginning, thence continue North 89 degrees 00 00" West, 362.28 feet, thence South 00 degrees 58' 00" West, 288.37 feet, to a point on the North line of Missouri State Route "K", thence with said North line, South 70 degrees 59' 51" East, 143.25 feet, thence leaving said Route "K", North 19 degrees 00' 19" East, 40.00 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.42 feet, thence North 70 degrees 59' 51" West, 60.96 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 25.12 feet, thence North 00 degrees 58' 00" East, 160.93 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.43 feet, thence South 89 degrees 00' 00" East, 219.98 feet, thence along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 30.00 feet, (the chord of said arc bears North 81 degrees 15' 52" East, 59.14 feet) a distance of 84.05 feet, thence North 00 degrees 58' 00" East, 40.60 feet, to the place of beginning. AND EAST TRACT: All that part of Lot No 2 of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 30 North, Range 13 East of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the County of Cape Girardeau, State of Missouri, described as follows: Commence at a found sandstone, (3" x 5"), marking the intersection of the North line of Said Section 3, it with the West line of United States Private Survey No 3090, thence with the North line of said Section 3, North 89 degrees 00' 00" West, passing a found sandstone at 803.50 feet, a distance of 1630.17 feet, to the place of beginning, thence South 00 degrees 38' 16" West, 411.41 feet to a point on the North line of Missouri State Route "K", thence with said North line, North 72 degrees 53' 09" West, 230.23 feet, thence North 70 degrees 59' 51" West, 48.06 feet, thence leaving said Route "K", North 19 degrees 00' 19" East, 40.00 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.42 feet, thence North 70 degrees 59' 51" West, 60.96 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 25.12 feet, thence North 00 degrees 58' 00" East, 160.93 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.43 feet, thence South 89 degrees 00' 00" East, 219.98 feet, thence along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 30.00 feet, (the chord of said arc bears North 81 degrees 15' 52" East, 59.14 feet), a distance of 84.05 feet, thence North 00 degrees 58' 00" East, 40.60 feet, thence South 89 degrees 00' 00" East, with the North line of said Section 3, 38.42 feet, to the place of beginning and containing 2.230 acres, more or less. ARTICLE 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. ARTICLE 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause three (3) certified copies of this ordinance in its final form to be filed with the Clerk of Cape Girardeau County in accordance with Section 71.012 RSMo. ARTICLE 4. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the annexation of the tract described in Article 1 hereof is reasonable and necessary to the proper development of the City and further, that the City has the ability to furnish normal municipal services to the tract to be annexed within a reasonable time. Further, the City Council hereby finds and determines that, with respect to the tract to be annexed into the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, all of the owners of all fee interest of record have requested such annexation by appropriate Petition. ARTICLE 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten days after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2021. Bob Fox, Mayor ATTEST: Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk 4178 State Highway K Annexation Staff: Ryan Shrimplin, AICP - City Planner Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT An Ordinance amending Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, by zoning property located at 4178 State Highway K, as C-2, Highway Commercial District. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The attached ordinance zones a newly annexed property, located at 4178 State Highway K, as C-2 (Highway Commercial District). A public hearing was held on December 21, 2020 to consider the proposed annexation and zoning of the property as C-2. Ordinances for the annexation and ward boundary extension for the property are on this agenda as separate items. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On November 16, 2020, the City Council acknowledged receipt of an annexation petition for the property at 4178 State Highway K. A public hearing was held on December 21, 2020 to consider the proposed annexation and zoning of the property as C-2 (Highway Commercial District). The attached ordinance zones the property as C-2 upon annexation. Ordinances for the annexation and ward boundary extension for the property are on this agenda as separate items. The adjacent property to the north and west is zoned R-1 (Single -Family Suburban Residential District) but is in the process of being rezoned to C-1 (General Commercial District). The adjacent property to the east is zoned C-2 (Highway Commercial District). The property to the south (across State Highway K) is outside the city limits and is not zoned. This area is characterized by agricultural land intermingled with various other uses (residences, schools, businesses). The Cape Vision 2040 Future Land Use Map shows the subject property as Regional Commercial. SUSTAINABILITY: ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS In considering a zoning district for a property to be annexed, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council must determine if the proposed zoning district is reasonable and in reasonable conformity with the existing uses and value of the immediately surrounding properties. The subject property contains a school bus storage and maintenance facility. C-2 is the zoning equivalent of the Regional Commercial future land use category in the Cape Vision 2040 comprehensive plan. Given the character of the subject property and the surrounding area, and the fact that the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan, the proposed zoning district is reasonable and in reasonable conformity with the existing uses and surrounding properties. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff report to the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended zoning the property as C-2 (Highway Commercial District) upon annexation. BOARD OR COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission, at its December 9, 2020 meeting, recommended zoning the property as C-2 (Highway Commercial District) upon annexation, with a vote of 7 in favor, 0 in opposition, and 0 abstaining. PUBLIC OUTREACH Notice of the City Councirs public hearing was advertised in the Southeast Missourian on December 6, 2020. In addition, a sign containing the date, time, location, and subject of the public hearing was posted on the property. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: ❑ 4178 State Highway K Zoning_C-2.doc Ordinance ❑ Staff Review Referral Action Formpdf 4178 State Highway K - Staff RRA Form ❑ Map_ -_zoning - 4178 State HighwaLpdf 4178 State Highway K -Zoning Map ❑ Maw- FLU - 4178 State Highway K.1df 4178 State Highway K - FLU Map ❑ CC-2.udf G2 District Regulations BILL NO. 21-04 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 30 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, BY ZONING NEWLY ANNEXED PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 4178 STATE HIGHWAY K, AS C-2, HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended zoning all of the newly annexed property described in Article 1 of this ordinance as C-2, Highway Commercial District; and WHEREAS, Public Notice of such change was given as prescribed in Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and a public hearing was held on December 21, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri has elected to zone the property described herein as set out below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1. Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri is hereby amended to zone the following newly annexed property as C-2, Highway Commercial District: WEST TRACT: All of that part of Lot No 2 of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 30 North, Range 13 East of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the County of Cape Girardeau, State of Missouri, described as follows: Commence at a found sandstone, (3" x 5"), marking the intersection of the North line of said Section 3, it with the West line of United States Private Survey No 3090, thence with the North line of said Section 3, North 89 degrees 00' 00" West, passing a found sandstone at 803.50 feet, a distance of 1668.59 feet, to the place of beginning, thence continue North 89 degrees 00 00" West, 362.28 feet, thence South 00 degrees 58' 00" West, 288.37 feet, to a point on the North line of Missouri State Route "K", thence with said North line, South 70 degrees 59' 51" East, 143.25 feet, thence leaving said Route "K", North 19 degrees 00' 19" East, 40.00 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.42 feet, thence North 70 degrees 59' 51" West, 60.96 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 25.12 feet, thence North 00 degrees 58' 00" East, 160.93 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.43 feet, thence South 89 degrees 00' 00'' East, 219.98 feet, thence along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 30.00 feet, (the chord of said arc bears North 81 degrees 15' 52" East, 59.14 feet) a distance of 84.05 feet, thence North 00 degrees 58' 00" East, 40.60 feet, to the place of beginning. AND EAST TRACT: All that part of Lot No 2 of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 30 North, Range 13 East of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the County of Cape Girardeau, State of Missouri, described as follows: Commence at a found sandstone, (3" x 5"), marking the intersection of the North line of Said Section 3, it with the West line of United States Private Survey No 3090, thence with the North line of said Section 3, North 89 degrees 00' 00" West, passing a found sandstone at 803.50 feet, a distance of 1630.17 feet, to the place of beginning, thence South 00 degrees 38' 16" West, 411.41 feet to a point on the North line of Missouri State Route "K", thence with said North line, North 72 degrees 53' 09" West, 230.23 feet, thence North 70 degrees 59' 51" West, 48.06 feet, thence leaving said Route "K", North 19 degrees 00' 19" East, 40.00 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.42 feet, thence North 70 degrees 59' 51" West, 60.96 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 25.12 feet, thence North 00 degrees 58' 00" East, 160.93 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.43 feet, thence South 89 degrees 00' 00" East, 219.98 feet, thence along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 30.00 feet, (the chord of said arc bears North 81 degrees 15' 52" East, 59.14 feet), a distance of 84.05 feet, thence North 00 degrees 58' 00" East, 40.60 feet, thence South 89 degrees 00' 00" East, with the North line of said Section 3, 38.42 feet, to the place of beginning and containing 2.230 acres, more or less. ARTICLE 2. The City Council of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri hereby finds that the property described in Article 1 of this ordinance is at the present time particularly suitable for the purposes and uses of the C-2, Highway Commercial District, and that such changes authorized hereby are reasonable and in reasonable conformity with the existing uses and value of the immediately surrounding properties. ARTICLE 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. ARTICLE 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten days after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2021. Bob Fox, Mayor ATTEST: Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI City Staff Review, Referral, and Action on Rezoning/Special Use Permit Application FILE NO. 1410 LOCATION: 4178 State Highway K STAFF REVIEW & COMMENTS: Staff is recommending that the property at 4178 State Highway K be zoned as C-2 (Highway Commercial District) upon annexation. SEE STAFF REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION. City l� /t /Z-0 Date V/V/ he, � �e I N:: � City AtNm4 Date City Manager Planning & Zoning Commission Action Public Hearing Posting Date: Public Hearing Date: MOTION: Oppose Abstain d ❑ Favor Oppose Abstain Scott Blank d' ❑ ❑ Jeff Glenn ❑ ❑ ❑ Kevin Greaser L❑f lJ ❑ ❑ Derek Jackson ❑ ❑ Patrick Koetting ❑ ❑ VOTE COUNT: I Favor COMMENTS: SEE MEETING MINUTES FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED Bruce Skinner Melissa Stickel Ed Thompson Deborah Young 0 Oppose Favor Oppose Abstain d ❑ ❑ ✓Lf ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ d ❑ ❑ 0 Abstain Kevin Greaser Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary City Council Action Posting Dates: Sign Newspaper Public Hearing Date: Ordinance I sr Reading_ Ordinance 2nd & 3rd Readings: VOTE COUNT: Favor Oppose ORDINANCE NO. Effective Date: Abstain Zoning Recommendation - 4178 State Highway K Zoning Recommendation - 4178 State Highway K Recommended Zoning: C-2 (Highway Commercial) -uture Land Use Recommendation: Regional Commercie Onyx Ln stat e Nigh �s ay N W E S 0 145 290 580 Fee 4250 4210 • 4178 • Area to be annexed AxA'.; CITYOf CAPE 0W G I R A R D E A U Created by: Development Services Carol Peters November 25, 2020 4072 • Legend QProperty to be annexed/zoned Parcels ® Cape City Limits FLU Recommendation Suburban Mixed Use Regional Commercial Low Density Residential C Institutional 12/15/2020 Cape Girardeau, MO Code of Ordinances Sec. 30-334. - C-2, highway commercial district. (a) Purpose. The C-2 district provides for commercial uses typically found along major thoroughfares, which are generally more intensive than uses permitted in the other commercial districts. As such, this district is primarily intended for areas of the city located in high-volume traffic corridors. In addition to uses permitted in the C-1 district, the C-2 district permits commercial developments requiring long term outdoor display of merchandise. Other uses having the potential to significantly affect adjacent residential and commercial districts may be allowed with approval of a special use permit. (b) Permitted principal uses. (1) Arenas or stadiums. (2) Art galleries or museums. (3) Auditoriums or theaters. (4) Banks or other financial institutions. (5) Banquet facilities. (6) Bed and breakfasts. (7) Commercial day cares. (8) Commercial recreation facilities. (9) Driving ranges. (10) Funeral homes or mortuaries. (11) Governmental facilities. (12) Health or fitness centers. (13) Helicopter landing pads, heliports or other landing areas in relationship with a hospital. (14) Hospitals. (15) Hotels or motels. (16) Institutions of higher education, including business, career or technology schools. (17) Instructional schools for art, dance, music, martial arts or other disciplines. (18) Kennels. (19) Libraries. (20) Medical marijuana dispensary facilities, as permitted in section 30-415, supplemental regulations. (21) Meeting halls. (22) Microbreweries. (23) Mini warehouses or self -storage units. (24) Nurseries or greenhouses. 1/4 12/15/2020 Cape Girardeau, MO Code of Ordinances (25) Nursing homes. (26) Offices. (27) Outdoor storage facilities for recreation vehicles or watercraft. (28) Parks or playgrounds. (29) Personal service establishments. (30) Pet grooming facilities. (31) Police or fire stations. (32) Residential treatment facilities. (33) Restaurants or bars. (34) Retail or rental establishments. (35) Television or radio studios, including any transmitting facilities. (36) Transit terminals. (37) Transitional housing. (38) Vehicle fueling, service or repair facilities, excluding body or paint shops. (39) Veterinary clinics or animal hospitals. (40) Warehouses or distribution centers. (41) Wineries. (c) Permitted accessory uses. (1) Accessory structures and uses customarily incidental to the above uses, as permitted in section 30-403, supplemental regulations. (2) Short term use of shipping containers for accessory uses, as permitted in section 30-402, supplemental regulations. (3) Solar energy systems, as permitted in section 30-4101 supplemental regulations. (d) Special uses. (1) Amusement parks. (2) Billboards, as permitted elsewhere in the City Code. (3) Campgrounds, travel trailer or recreation vehicle parks. (4) Long term use of shipping containers for accessory uses, as permitted in section 30-402, supplemental regulations. (5) Manufactured business units, for office use only. (6) Public utilities, except for buildings or accessory structures that are normal and customary in a zoning district which would allow other buildings or structures of the same nature as a use - by -right. (7) Short term or long term use of shipping containers for principal uses, as permitted in section 2/4 12/15/2020 Cape Girardeau, MO Code of Ordinances 30-402, supplemental regulations. (8) Telecommunication towers, as permitted in section 30-404, supplemental regulations. (9) The allowance of additional height up to a total of one hundred (100) feet, not to exceed a total of eight (8) stories. (10) Vehicle body or paint shops. (11) Vehicle washing facilities, automatic or hand wash. (12) Wind energy conversion systems, as permitted in section 30-410, supplemental regulations. (e) Standards. (1) Outdoor display of merchandise is permitted in accordance with the following provisions: a. Displays shall not be located in a right-of-way. b. Displays shall not be located in parking spaces used to meet the minimum number of parking spaces as required elsewhere in the City Code. Vehicles for sale or rental and displays that are part of a bazaar, craft sale, garage or yard sale, or similar temporary event are exempt from this requirement, as determined by the city manager. c. Displays shall not impede vehicular or pedestrian access. d. Displays shall not alter the structure of any building. e. Displays shall not create a health or safety hazard. f. Displays shall be well kept and orderly. g. Signs may be displayed as permitted elsewhere in the City Code. h. The display of seasonal items shall be limited to a time period that is customary for the season associated with the display, which shall be at the discretion of the city manager. (2) Outdoor service areas and equipment such as loading docks, mechanical equipment, storage areas, or waste containers shall be located in the rear or side yard and screened as required elsewhere in the City Code. (f) Height, area, width, setback and open space requirements. (1) Maximum height: Sixty (60) feet, not to exceed five (5) stories. (2) Minimum lot area: None. (3) Minimum lot width: None. (4) Minimum setbacks: a. Front yard: Twenty-five (25) feet. b. Rear yard: None, except twenty (20) feet when adjacent to a residential use or district, or ten (10) feet when adjacent to an agricultural use or district. c. Side yard: None, except twenty (20) feet when adjacent to a residential use or district, or ten (10) feet when adjacent to an agricultural use or district. (5) Minimum open space. Fifteen (15) percent of the lot area. 3/4 12/15/2020 (Ord. No. 5211 , art. 5, 7-15-19) Cape Girardeau, MO Code of Ordinances Editor's note— Ord. No. 5211 , art. 51 adopted July 15, 2019, repealed the former § 30-334 and enacted a new section as set out herein. The former § 30-334 pertained to similar subject matter and derived from Ord. No. 5012, art. 5, adopted Oct. 2, 2017. 4/4 Staff: Ryan Shrimplin, AlCP - City Planner Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT An Ordinance extending the boundaries of Ward 6 to include property newly annexed into the city limits of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The attached ordinance extends the boundaries of Ward 6 to include newly annexed property, located at 4178 State Highway K. A public hearing was held on December 21, 2020 to consider the proposed annexation and zoning of the property as C-2 (Highway Commercial District). Ordinances for the annexation and zoning of the property are on this agenda as separate items. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the ordinance extending the boundaries of Ward 6 to include the newly annexed property at 4178 State Highway K. Name: D 4178 State _Hwy _K Ward BoundaryEad.doc D Map- 4178_State _Highway �K Ward BoundM 5dension.pdf Description: Ordinance 4178 State Highway K - Ward Boundary Extension Map BILL NO. 21-05 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF WARD 6 TO INCLUDE PROPERTY NEWLY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1. The boundary of "Ward 6" is hereby amended by adding the legal description of the following property newly annexed into the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri: 4178 STATE HIGHWAY K WEST TRACT: All of that part of Lot No 2 of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 30 North, Range 13 East of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the County of Cape Girardeau, State of Missouri, described as follows: Commence at a found sandstone, (3" x 5"), marking the intersection of the North line of said Section 3, it with the West line of United States Private Survey No 3090, thence with the North line of said Section 3, North 89 degrees 00' 00" West, passing a found sandstone at 803.50 feet, a distance of 1668.59 feet, to the place of beginning, thence continue North 89 degrees 00 00" West, 362.28 feet, thence South 00 degrees 58' 00" West, 288.37 feet, to a point on the North line of Missouri State Route "K", thence with said North line, South 70 degrees 59' 51" East, 143.25 feet, thence leaving said Route "K", North 19 degrees 00' 19" East, 40.00 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.42 feet, thence North 70 degrees 59' 51" West, 60.96 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 25.12 feet, thence North 00 degrees 58' 00" East, 160.93 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.43 feet, thence South 89 degrees 00' 00'' East, 219.98 feet, thence along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 30.00 feet, (the chord of said arc bears North 81 degrees 15' 52" East, 59.14 feet) a distance of 84.05 feet, thence North 00 1 degrees 58' 00" East, 40.60 feet, to the place of beginning. "►I EAST TRACT: All that part of Lot No 2 of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 30 North, Range 13 East of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the County of Cape Girardeau, State of Missouri, described as follows: Commence at a found sandstone, (3" x 5"), marking the intersection of the North line of Said Section 3, it with the West line of United States Private Survey No 3090, thence with the North line of said Section 3, North 89 degrees 00 00" West, passing a found sandstone at 803.50 feet, a distance of 1630.17 feet, to the place of beginning, thence South 00 degrees 38' 16" West, 411.41 feet to a point on the North line of Missouri State Route "K", thence with said North line, North 72 degrees 53' 09" West, 230.23 feet, thence North 70 degrees 59' 51" West, 48.06 feet, thence leaving said Route "K", North 19 degrees 00' 19" East, 40.00 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.42 feet, thence North 70 degrees 59' 51" West, 60.96 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 25.12 feet, thence North 00 degrees 58' 00" East, 160.93 feet, thence along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a distance of 31.43 feet, thence South 89 degrees 00' 00" East, 219.98 feet, thence along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 30.00 feet, (the chord of said arc bears North 81 degrees 15' 52" East, 59.14 feet), a distance of 84.05 feet, thence North 00 degrees 58' 00" East, 40.60 feet, thence South 89 degrees 00' 00" East, with the North line of said Section 3, 38.42 feet, to the place of beginning and containing 2.230 acres, more or less. ARTICLE 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, 2 and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. ARTICLE 3. It is the intention of the governing body and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and the sections of this Code may be renumbered to accomplish such intention. ARTICLE 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten days after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2021. ATTEST: Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk Bob Fox, Mayor 3 Ward 6 Boundary Extension 4178 State Highway K Staff: Scott A. Meyer, City Manager Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT Appropriation from the General Fund balance for the Committee for Affordable Technical Education to conduct a needs analysis/community survey for a future community college/technical school taxing district in the Cape Girardeau Region. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This ordinance would appropriate funds for the Committee for Affordable Technical Education to conduct a needs analysis/community survey for a future community college/technical schools taxing district in the Cape Girardeau Region. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Committee for Affordable Technical Education was recently formed by the districts of Cape Girardeau, Jackson, and Perryville to pursue the formation of a community college/technical school taxing district in the Cape Girardeau Region. The Committee submitted a letter of intent to the Department of Higher Education Workforce Development. The next step in the process is to conduct a needs analysis/community survey. The Committee is seeking financial commitments from various entities to cover the cost. The Committee has indicated they have commitments from the City of Perryville and Perry County. They have also requested financial assistance from the City of Jackson, the IDA of Cape Girardeau County, and others. The City of Cape Girardeau received a letter from Rich Payne, the Chairman of the Committee for Affordable Technical Education, requesting the City of Cape Girardeau's financial support for this effort. The Committee is asking for $20,000 from the City of Cape Girardeau. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: ❑ Affordable Technical Education Annropriation.doc Ordinance ❑ 2020.12 ConnnxnitycCollege _tax district study request ltr.ndf Request Letter ❑ Committee Members_(33 (11.ndf Committee for Affordable Education ❑ 1 Proposal Cane Girardeau Comm College_District Needs Assessment 08122020 revised.pdf Needs Assessment D 3518! Cane Girardeau FINAL REPORT- Volume I erh032509.pdf I Needs Assessment Final Report D 3518- Cane Girardeau Needs Assessrnent APPENDICES- Volume H erh032509.Rd I Needs Assessment Appendices BILL NO. 21-06 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS RELATED TO THE COMMITTEE FOR AFFORDABLE TECHNICAL EDUCATION, IN THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1. The City Council of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, hereby appropriates expenditures related to the Committee for Affordable Technical Education for: City Manager Contingency - Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) to assist to contract a consulting firm to perform an analysis of the community related to a community technical school taxing district in the City of Cape Girardeau. ARTICLE 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten days after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2021. Bob Fox, Mayor ATTEST: Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk City Manager, Scott IVeyen City of Cape Girardeau 41011 Indepenc ence 911. Cape Girarc eau, MO E13101 Dear 9aott,, I ami writing 11a reqs est th al the City of Cade E irardeaL consider suppartin® tF a neec s analysis/comiml nity survey. 9L pporl is needec to continL ei to purse e a community aolleee/ WC h nical <.iahoal taxin8 district in th ei Cape ElirardeaL Region. Th a Camimittee fon Alffonc able Teahniaal 9dL cation h as t een formed by the districts of Cape Giram eau, .lackson and Perryville. The committee hasi sig k mitted a letter oil intent to the Elepari mierit oil Hi®h er Edgy cation Workforce Development. Th a Coordinating Board h as aecapted th a letter of intenil. lIh a next Aup in th a proaesis is th ei needs analy sisi / comimunity survey. The coAI of th a aonsu luntl 110 do the work is ; 98,31E and ME T Cansulting wou Id t a cantraated to performs the needs analysiis / community SL rvey. To date I h a%a aomim itments fromi the City of Perryville for $10,,000 anc Perry1 County for $310,000.1 ami also working with the aity of hakson, the IDA of Cape E inane eaL Cau my and others to fund this project. As the Chairman for tl• a Committee 1br Affonc able Tech nival 9dL cation. I wog Id like to formally requesiil carisic erition from City of Cape Girardeau to suppart this ragional effort to provides a much needed part of our ec uciational siysitemi in this region. 9inaerely„ Riah Rayne Chairman Committee for Affordabla Ilea nieal Education. TECHNICAL COLLEGE STEERING COMMITTEE Name First Last E -Mail Phone Area Brent Buerck brentbuerck cit of perryviIle.corn 573-547-2594 Perryville Chris Francis Cfrancis1017 mail.com 573-768-6073 Perryville Paul Gard and bankofmissouri.com 573-547-6541 Perryville Brian Gerau director 'acksonmocha mber.or 573-243-8131 Jackson Jeff Glennlenn lenn r.com 573-270-4053 Cape Girardeau Charlie Glueck charlie lueck1 mail.com Jackson Tim Goodman tqoodmanC@_bhinv.com 573-332-1616 Libby Guilliams guilliamslcapetigers.com 573-576-1149 Cape Girardeau Mayor Hahs ds"hahs aol.com 573-803-7761 Jackson Matt Huber huber libert utilities.com Jackson Jared Kutz 'wmkutz err count mo.us 573-547-4242 Perryville John Link kC@jr2mail.or 573-243-9501 Jackson Danielle Po ner d o ner drur sw.com 573-335-3134 An ela Prost Angela. rost t missouri.com 573-547-1041 Ext 551 Perryville Jim Riley rile rlci.com 573 270- 2408 Cape Girardeau Scott Sattler perryedasattlerCa)_gmail.com 573-547-1097 Perryville Andy Stover astover jr2mail.or 573-579-9722 Jackson Kathy Swan kathy.swan@jcs-wireless.com 573-270-0017 Cape Girardeau Paul Nennin er Paul. nenninger(c_gmail.com 573-587-0496 Steven iTaylor sta for firstmeansmore.com 573-334-9000 Cape Girardeau Adrian ITaylor successoutreach ahoo.com 720-271-7478 Cape Girardeau Rich jPayne r a ne6161 mail.com 573-837-6595 PROPOSAL 4M* MGT AUGUST 12, 2020 REVISED CONSULTING GROUP VIA EMAIL SUBMITTED BY: MELANIE HICKS, PHD VICE PRESIDENT EDUCATION SERVICES GROUP 8200 SOUTH QUEBEC SUITE A3 #184 CENTENNIAL, COLORADO 80112 888.302.0899 MHicks@mgtconsulting.com NEEDS ASSESSMENT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT No WWW.MGTCONSULTING.COM CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT AUGUST 12, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. COMPANY OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................... ABOUT MGT CONSULTING GROUP.................................................................................. 1 THE MGT CONSULTING ADVANTAGE.............................................................................. 2 OUR WORK IN MISSOURI AND IN CAPE GIRARDEAU.......................................................3 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS............................................................................................. 9 MARKET RESEARCH QUANTITATIVE QUALITY EXPERIENCE ............................................. 9 CASE STUDIES (QUANTITATIVE FOCUS)......................................................................... 10 NEEDS ASSESSMENTS STUDIES...................................................................................... 13 3. APPROACH AND WORKPLAN....................................................................................................... 22 WORKPLAN.................................................................................................................... 22 TIMELINE....................................................................................................................... 28 4. THE MGT TEAM....................................................................................................................................29 STAFF QUALIFICATIONS AND RESUMES......................................................................... 29 S. COST PROPOSAL.................................................................................................................................42 **i*i MGT WWW. MGTCONSULTING.COM CONSULTING GROUP I. COMPANY OVERVIEW ABOUT MGT CONSULTING GROUP MGT of America Consulting, LLC (MGT) is one of the nation's premier higher education consulting firms and has been in business for over 45 years providing quality management consulting and research services to educational institutions and public agencies nationwide. The firm has successfully managed over 13,000 client engagements nationally with a significant portion of MGT's engagements being_ repeat business, reflecting the firm's reputation and track record for achieving a high level of customer satisfaction and ability to exceed the expectations of clients. MGT has extensive experience with universities, colleges, and other public -sector clients across the country. With regard to higher education institutions, during MGrs 40+ year history, there is virtually no aspect of institution operations, systems, processes and programs MGT has not assessed, evaluated, or studied in some way to achieve greater operational effectiveness. MGT's higher education clients have included a diverse group of educational institutions, higher education governing boards, boards of trustees, and other higher education entities. We are committed to providing customized services, objective research, creative solutions, and quality products that respond to each client's unique needs and time requirements. Our firm has over 100 professionals and administrative staff to support our clients' success. MGT's headquarters are in Tampa, Florida with additional offices across the country, including one in Texas. NATIONAL FIRM LOCAL FOCUS CALIFORNIA ILLINOIS Sacramento I Pasadena Chicago COLORADO MICHIGAN Denver Bay City FLORIDA Tallahassee I Tampa KANSAS Wichita TEXAS Dallas VIRGINIA Richmond NORTH CAROLINA WASHINGTON Raleigh Seattle OHIO Columbus For over 40 years, our ability to excel has been driven by our expertise, quality, and our commitment to exceeding client expectations. Part of MGT's success is based upon our promise to be flexible and responsive. We are acutely aware of the political, economic, social, and technological factors that impact today's higher education institutions. MGT is structured into several primary consulting divisions: **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 1 I. COMPANY OVERVIEW Financial Solutions, Government Consulting, Education Consulting, and Social Justice Consulting. The MGT Education Solutions Group will be responsible for completion of the project. MGT MAJOR CONSULTING LINES OF BUSINESS Government Consulting Diversity and Inclusion Everything from an organizational analysis to Disparity research and diversity studies to II I a jail privatization study to a strategic plan to provide an organization or community with move an organization from reactive mode to a more equitable and inclusive proactive mode. environment. Education Solutions Financial Solutions From student outcomes and performance, to _ Our nationally -recognized experts help clients .�% operational effectiveness, our solutions have weather fluctuating market conditions and impacted more than 50 million students rising demands on their budgets using a across the globe. variety of proven solutions. IF mill, r" C'.-14-1 Cyber Security and Technology Specializing In classification and we help IT and Cyber leaders navigate and compensation studies, this practice helps manage cyber threats through a Cyber public agencies retain and attract the right Security Office program that provides an "a la talent. carte" menu for customization. THE MGT CONSULTING ADVANTAGE • MGT offers an impartial perspective on organizational processes and practices. As an independent entity, our only vested interest is that of the clients; therefore, we apply our extensive experience to generating objective independent solutions to assist our client needs. • MGT leverages best -of -breed data sources to inform new policy development. Our team balances "gold standard" resources with our unique past performance lessons learned. • MGT has an extensive track record of providing consulting services that are similar in scope to this project. Our solutions help the public and private organizations we work with to more effectively and efficiently achieve their goals and serve constituents. We are committed to providing customized consulting services, objective research, creative solutions, and quality products that respond to each client's unique needs and time requirements. • MGT provides solutions which are specifically tailored to meet the needs of our clients. The MGT team has an impressive track record of providing customized solutions, objective research, creative recommendations, and quality products that respond to each client's unique needs and time requirements. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT I. COMPANY OVERVIEW OUR WORK IN MISSOURI AND IN CAPE GIRARDEAU MGT has a long history working in the state of Missouri, starting in 1987. Since that time, we have worked on several projects ranging from Statistical and Planning Assistance for the Civic Council of Greater Kansas City; Master Planning Services for Kansas City Public Schools; an M/WBE Participation Study for the St. Louis Area Consortium; Classification and Job Evaluation Review for the City of Columbia; and a Performance Audit of the JacKSOn county tlection board and Kansas city tlection Board; and a Disparity Study for MBE/WBE Activity for the Kansas City Consortium, as well as several higher education and higher education adjacent projects, including one for the Cape Girardeau Chamber of Commerce. Cape Girardeau Area Chamber of Commerce I Analysis of Educational Needs of Cape Girardeau Area MGT was retained by Cape Girardeau Education Coalition Task Force through the Cape Girardeau Chamber of Commerce in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Higher Education to conduct a comprehensive postsecondary education needs assessment for the local market area in southeast Missouri and southwest Illinois. The study relied on the collection and review of market demographic, education and occupational data, along with extensive qualitative and quantitative input from a variety of local stakeholders. These included community leaders, business representatives, education leaders, current local college students, high school seniors, and residents. The purpose of the study was to identify gaps and gauge demand for academic programs, related training, and other student services in the local community across all postsecondary education levels. MISSOut-ki EXPERIENCE 33 years 32 projects **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGES CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT I. COMPANY OVERVIEW Central Missouri State University I Development of Computing Technology Masterplan MGT and Arthur Young & Company analyzed the computing technology needs of Central Missouri State University. This engagement included an CENTRAL inventory of the current use of technology on the campus and the CENTRAL determination of likely applications for expanded use of technology (and" MISSOURI. especially computers) during the next decade. This information was 19 LEARNING TOAGREATER DEGREE prepared for inclusion in the university's strategic plan. Relevant experience gained in this project included: assessments of current institutional computer systems; identification of current and future computer needs; and assisting in development of a university technology plan. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 4 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT I. COMPANY OVERVIEW Civic Council of Greater Kansas City I Statistical and Planning Assistance The Civic Council of Greater Kansas City engaged MGT to assist the Lim THE CIVIC COUNCIL Council in its goal of increasing the level of state funding for Kansas higher education. MGT provided statistical analysis to answer the questions: Has public financial support for Kansas higher education declined and how does the level of support compare to national averages? Are state appropriations low relative to other states with institutions in the Big 12? and Are faculty salaries falling behind competitive levels? The Civic Council used these data to increase public support for higher education and to lobby the Kansas legislature for increased funding. Civic Council of Greater Kansas City I Funding of Higher Education The Civic Council of Greater Kansas City contracted with MGT to present to the Kansas Board of Regents the results of MGT's study assessing Kansas' investment in higher education. The study found that public financial support for higher education in Kansas had declined from 1990 levels, to a level below a= THE CIVIC COUNCIL national averages and below the average support of the states comprising the Big 12 athletic conference: Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas. In addition, faculty salaries at Kansas institutions lagged behind salaries at similar institutions in the states around Kansas and behind the national averages for similar institutions. Civic Council of Greater Kansas City I Higher Education Funding The Civic Council of Greater Kansas City contracted with MGT to complete an analysis of state funding for higher education in Missouri. THE CIVIC • UNCIL MGT compared funding for the University of Missouri system to the funding in the contiguous states, as well as funding for each public institution in Missouri to funding for its peer institutions, with special emphasis on the University of Missouri, Kansas City. In addition, MGT completed an inventory of the programs offered at all two-year and four-year not -for- profit postsecondary institutions within the Kansas City metropolitan area to determine if the economic development and manpower needs of Kansas City were being met. MGT also developed a set of accountability measures for the University of Missouri, Kansas City, and collected baseline data on those measures from UMKC and its peer universities. Civic Council of Greater Kansas City I Update of the Missouri Funding Study The Civic Council of Greater Kansas City engaged MGT to update om two phases its earlier study of Missouri funding for public higher education. In Phase I, MGT provided a comparison of funding for public higher education in Missouri, including 10 years of Missouri data. C, Appropriations data reflected mid -year budget reductions resulting from misappropriations of funds. From these data, MGT constructed trend lines that showed Missouri higher education's share of the state budget, state appropriations per student, and state appropriations per capita over the ten-year time period. MGT compared the share of the state budget to the average data for comparable states for the last five years and compared these data to the prior report. In Phase II, **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 5 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT I. COMPANY OVERVIEW MGT worked with the Civic Council and institutions to select peer institutions, and then compared state appropriations per student at each of the Missouri public college and university campuses to similar data at the peer institutions. The analysis included both the four-year and the two- year public institutions. MGT also examined faculty salaries at each of the Missouri institutions, and compared salaries to those at the peer institutions, and to the average for comparable institutions across the nation. Finally, MGT compared funding prior to 2003 to funding since 2003, in light of the national economic situation. Independence Chamber of Commerce I Feasibility Study for Higher Education Residence Center MGT was selected by a committee of campus, business, and state officials to conduct a feasibility study for a higher education residence center in `^a�_�, nim�om■ Independence, Missouri. A major aspect of determining the feasibility of the INDEPENDENCE center was to document the level of community demand for expanded higher education services. To measure potential demand, MGT conducted a mail H A M B E R survey of area high school seniors; a telephone survey of area residents; and personal interviews with business and community leaders. Findings from the three separate data - gathering activities were consolidated into a written final report. Logan University College of Chiropractic I Market Feasibility Study MGT assisted Logan University College of Chiropractic in a comprehensive assessment of its market position and its potential to be successful in developing new degree programs. Issues examined in the assessment included the impact of an institutional name change on donor support and student acceptance, the identification and feasibility analysis of additional degree programs, and the development of marketing strategies for promoting new programs. Research techniques included competitive analysis, focus group and survey research, and image assessment. Missouri Coordinating Board for Higher Education I Higher Education Needs Assessment The University of Missouri System retained MGT to conduct an educational needs assessment of the St. Louis Metropolitan area. Specifically, MGT was contracted to prepare the needs assessment documentation required in applications for establishment of residence center programs that must be approved by the Missouri Coordinating Board for Higher Education (CBHE). The system institution, University of Missouri, St. Louis (UMSL), submitted 114 applications to the Board for residence centers in St. Charles County and Jefferson County. MGTs role was to identify and document perceived need and demand for the program offerings, degree programs, and services of a residence center in each of the proposed service areas. The methodology carried out by MGT to meet CBHE requirements included in - class surveys of area high school seniors and current community college students, telephone surveys of area adult residents, and personal interviews with a cross- section of local business representatives and community leaders. Through these data collection mechanisms, MGT identified key program areas of interest, support services and other activities expected from a UMSL residence center, estimates of interest level and need for the various groups, and the level of support in the communities for a UMSL presence. Additionally, MGT computed a demand estimate based on current and projected population **i*i MGT CONSULTING GROUP CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 6 I. COMPANY OVERVIEW changes of college-age population, current educational attainment levels, and anticipated enrollment goals. The analysis enabled the university to identify a potential enrollment pool beyond current enrollment levels. This estimate highlighted what the maximum potential enrollment might be under the best -case scenario. A final component of the assessment study was to identify and assess other possible options for increasing the higher education degree opportunities in the two target areas. These options were heavily related to some form or combination of distance learning. MGT provided a broad- based perspective on distance learning options in each area and possible options for the UMSL and the Missouri System to pursue. MGT was also contracted to provide expert testimony before CBHE at the time the applications were considered. Both applications for residence centers were approved by the Board. Missouri State University I Student Housing Market Analysis and Report Missouri State University contracted with MGT to conduct a Student Housing Market Analysis. The project analyzed historical enrollment and housing participation trends, reviewed enrollment projections, gathered qualitative and quantitative data from current students, assessed the local off -campus student Missouri housing rental market, reviewed on -campus housing inventory and rental rates� at peer and competitive institutions, prepared housing capacity and demand State, estimates, conducted a review of existing facilities and a site analysis of possible U N I V E R S I T Y housing locations, and prepared a financial analysis of proposed housing renovation and/or new construction projects. Regional Economic Development, Inc. I Workforce Development Study to Examine the Feasibility of Developing or Enhancing the Technical Training Opportunities in Boone County, Missouri The Regional Economic Development, Inc. of Boone County, Missouri • engaged MGT to conduct a market analysis and assessment of postsecondary training and education needs across the county. A particular focus was on technical skills training and program options available to traditional and non-traditional students and the current workforce. The study included an extensive review of market data, along with surveys and other means of stakeholder input, including local employers, community leaders, economic development officials, and current high school and postsecondary students. A final summary report and presentation was provided for the organization and invited guests. Southwest Missouri State University (now Missouri State) I Education Program Needs Assessment Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield, selected MGT to collect and analyze data to assess the potential need for new undergraduate degree programs in the health professions, graduate programs in chemistry, and nontraditional programs for place -bound adults. This study was in response to Missouri the University's own planning and to comply with a request from the Missouri++� Coordinating Board for Higher Education. As part of the needs assessment efforts, MGT compiled information from the following sources: interviews with U N I V E R S I T Y university faculty and administrators; interviews with area employers; a **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 7 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT I. COMPANY OVERVIEW telephone and mail survey of potential students; focus groups of prospective students; and analysis of existing economic and demographic databases. From the data collection and analysis, MGT developed estimates of probable demand for various programs. University of Missouri, Kansas City I Higher Education Feasibility Study The University of Missouri, Kansas City, retained MGT to work with other planning consultants on identifying specific program needs for the downtown area, where the university is establishing their new Center for the City.umtkc Specifically, existing market information was reviewed, and input (via interviews, surveys, and focus groups) from key local stakeholders, downtown UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI employers, employees, and residents was collected and compiled into a KANSAS CITY prioritized list of program demand, advantages, and barriers for the Center to consider. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 8 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS MARKET RESEARCH QUANTITATIVE QUALITY EXPERIENCE MGT has been conducting qualitative and quantitative data surveys for more than 40 years. Our research in the areas of government, community and education is robust, proven and published. Below is a brief outline of the various ways we gather and analyze quantitative data. STAKEHOLDER SURVEYS i� Stakeholder Surveys Web -Based Data Collection Systems Telephone Surveys MGT has developed key quality control measures for all forms of survey research. We have the strictest standards for face to face, telephone, and web -based survey research and can ensure our clients accurate and confidential/anonymous quantitative and qualitative data analyses. Clients use our expertise and our data bank of survey questions to compare results to peers as well as track how internal perceptions differ from year to year, especially after programs have been implemented. MGT uses secured web servers for this purpose so clients can be reassured of confidentiality. WEB -BASED DATA COLLECTION SYSTEMS MGT has developed customized and secured web -based data collection systems for numerous clients to support program administration and evaluation. The systems include data submission and reporting modules that are friendly and very easy to manipulate. The systems provide timely data with flexibility in reporting. Clients find that our expertise allows for faster delivery of products that can be modified for their needs. Further, our result sets can be adapted for easier imports into the required federal systems. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 9 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Qualtrics is the primary online survey platform tool we use to program, create, and distribute custom web -based surveys (such as data assessment surveys). By using this tool, our team is able to develop surveys with more options in the question types (descriptive, multiple choice, matrix tables, rank order, constant sum, side by side, drill down, etc.) as well as more options in advanced programming (such as carry forward choices, skip and display logic, survey flow), which allows us to develop surveys that direct what the respondents see and where they go. We maintain a n extensive survey question bank for a variety of public sector and higher education clientele. TELEPHONE SURVEYS If our clients require a telephone survey, MGT has arrangements with several professional survey call centers who conduct that data collection process on our behalf, and under AAPOR and CASRO guidelines. They can accommodate client generated samples, independent market lists, or an RDD generated approach. MGT works with the client to develop the survey instrument, set sample sizes and response targets based on an appropriate confidence level and margin of error. We can monitor survey progress and make adjustments, if needed, in real time. Completed telephone survey data files are transmitted from the calling center to MGT for analysis and reporting. SURVEY EXPERIE1%* I _M% F: 45 490 years nts CASE STUDIES (QUANTITATIVE FOCUS) Palm Beach State College I College -Wide Strategic Plan Support Project Description: MGT assisted Palm Beach State College in the development of its new 5 -year strategic plan, including facilitating the work of the Strategic Planning Committee and the Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. MGT collected and analyzed quantitative and qualitative data from internal and external stakeholders, conducted a SWOT analysis with a variety of stakeholders, and interviewed PBSC administrators and managers. The team assisted senior leadership review the mission, vision, and values of the College. MGT through a variety of data collection and analysis, helped to ensure the new five-year strategic plan accommodates the College's strategic and innovative **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 10 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS growth, while maintaining program and service quality to respond to the needs of their designated service area. Quantitative Research Components: SWOT surveys were sent to current students, faculty (full-time and adjuncts), staff, administrators, Board of Trustees, and Alumni as part of preparing a new strategic plan for the College. Approximately 10,300 individuals were invited to participate in the survey. Project Challenges and Solutions: Encouraging stakeholder participation in a "survey heavy" environment and current students who have limited motivation to respond is a common artifact of the college environment. MGT's use of the Qualtrics survey platform helped to efficiently monitor daily participation across sub -groups, customize reminder notices and appeals, and allowed for timely feedback to individual campuses, major academic and operational units to boost completions. Outcomes: The survey generated nearly 900 responses from a wide spectrum of institutional constituents helping to illustrate a broad spectrum of perceptions and opinions regarding institutional current strengths and weaknesses, as well as future opportunities and threats that the strategic planning committee must take under consideration during their discussions and deliberations. Contributions of Client and MGT: The institution provided access to active e-mails for administrators, faculty, staff, students, and alumni and informational announcements regarding the strategic planning initiative and appeals to encourage survey participation. MGT provided the Qualtrics platform, guidance and facilitation to the strategic planning committee, and an unbiased and neutral partner to analyze stakeholder input and summarize key talking points and perceptions. Metrics of Success: Achieved institution -wide SWOT survey representation and reasonable participation rates by all internal subgroups to inform the initial strategic plan priorities, goals and objectives. Iowa Board of Regents I Des Moines Metro Area Degree Program Needs Assessment Project Description: MGT was engaged by the Iowa Board of Regents to assess the need for expanded degree program access in the greater Des Moines metro area and to determine the most appropriate delivery options/location for those programs. MGT applied its long-standing program needs assessment model to the assignment that relies on analysis of a combination of market data, existing available programs, competitive factors, and critical stakeholder input to determine needs and gaps in degree programs. The consulting team worked closely with the local Economic Development entity, Chamber of Commerce, school district and the major public/private higher education institutions serving this market. Following extensive input opportunities through focus groups, one-on-one interviews and a cadre of surveys, a demand analysis was prepared. A report was submitted which identified programs of interest and need, competitive forces, market segments and projected demand. MGT presented the study findings to the Board of Regents for appropriate review and action. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 11 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Quantitative Research Components: Three separate surveys were developed and distributed to samples of employers, current community college students, and high school guidance counselors in the greater Des Moines metro area to determine gaps and opportunities to expand local access to baccalaureate & graduate programs. MGT used the Qualtrics survey platform to develop, distribute and summarize survey findings. Project Challenges and Solutions: Three different audiences required very unique survey content, delivery options and approval permissions. Obtaining information regarding potential survey recipients from a variety of entities took considerable coordination and varying levels of effort. Extensive pre - survey planning work to obtain contact lists for each target audience, to preview and gain approvals of key points of inquiry required before full initiation of the web -based survey and establish response monitoring reminder notification protocols. Outcomes: Roughly 160 stakeholders responded to the surveys, including 70 community college students, 57 employers, and 32 high school guidance counselors. Contributions of Client and MGT: The Board of Regents and the local Chamber were indispensable partners with MGT in order to gain participation from the various stakeholder groups. MGT in turn, offered a broad range of input options distributed among all parties to ensure a robust and rich data portfolio for assessing local needs. Metrics of Success: The surveys generated a diverse mix of respondent participation and data to support the qualitative findings related to local program needs by degree level, verification of barriers to program access, and potential solutions for the Iowa Universities to address in the near-term future. The inclusive process of qualitative and quantitative stakeholder input proved quite valuable in driving a commitment to improved access and cooperation among the three public universities serving the Des Moines metro. Purdue University I Student Housing Demand Study Project Description: MGT, working with a national campus master planning firm, conducted a student housing demand analysis for the University as a separate, yet coordinated planning initiative. The study included an assessment of bed capacity, occupancy, configuration, and price points, an off - campus market review, extensive input from current students, defined planning parameters, and financial current obligations of the existing housing inventory on campus. The project culminated in an initial set of campus housing demand estimates, proposed project sequencing, and corresponding financial pro forma analysis. Quantitative Research Components: More than 27,000 students were invited to participate in the housing demand survey. All levels, including graduate students, part-time and full-time, living on and off campus, interested in single student and family housing were included. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 12 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Project Challenges and Solutions: University officials wanted to survey the full population of all students in lieu of a statistically valid sample. MGT's use of Qualtrics survey platform to control and monitor daily participation across the various student sub -groups was used to mitigate excessive survey costs. Outcomes: Roughly 7,600 completed responses were obtained across all student segments of interest. This rich data set allowed MGT, the campus master planners, and University Student Affairs leadership to have full confidence in the resulting interest and demand measures, as well as housing amenities and unit type preferences at various price points. Contributions of Client and MGT: Purdue's desire to survey its entire student body created a significant dilemma for the consulting team, given a limited budget. The Qualtrics survey platform allowed the MGT team to closely monitor response rates and magnitude without sacrificing rigor and genera lizability of findings. Metrics of Success: High completion counts supported the confidence in resulting housing interest levels by subgroup. NEEDS ASSESSMENTS STUDIES MGT has completed more than 300 needs assessment studies throughout our history, across all of our service areas, for individual institutions, as well as system -wide engagements. Highlighted below are MGT projects conducted at the system -wide level, both current and completed. Additional information on any project is available upon request. College of Western Idaho PERKINS V COMPREHENSIVE LOCAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT. MGT is assisting the College of Western Idaho (CWI) with a project to gather data, conduct in-depth analyses, and provide a summary analysis of the 10 counties of Region 3 in Idaho for workforce development activities (including education and training). The CLNA focus is on training for existing and emerging popular industry sectors and occupations of the 10 -county region, compared to existing CTE programs in the same region. The State of Idaho intends to use this needs assessment as part of a comprehensive CLNA to address Idaho's existing and emerging industry sectors and align state -level CTE programs to meet these needs. Florida Gulf Coast University (FL) PROGRAM NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY. MGT conducted a programFLORIDA needs assessment for Florida Gulf Coast University. The study includedOUNIVERSITY GULF COAST a demographic and market analysis of the designated five -county institutional service area; a similar analysis of selected secondary markets in close geographic proximity to the university; interviews with academic program directors, university leaders, and other administrators; interviews with local employers, community leaders, and education officials; and research groups with current Florida Gulf Coast University and ECC students and high school guidance directors. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 13 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS CHALLENGE: The University noticed that the five -county demographics were changing — and affecting the services and programs they needed to offer in order to fulfill the needs of current and prospective students. SOLUTION: MGT's study identified academic programs, continuing education programs, and the service needs of the market that the university can pursue in the future to better fit the needs of current and future students. Florida International University (FL) ACADEMIC PROGRAM NEEDS ASSESSMENT. MGT conducted a programmatic needs assessment study for Florida International University in the Broward County market. MGT collected information on program and services needs and preferences from adult residents of the county through a telephone survey, and on business/employer needs through a mail survey. The research team conducted personal interviews with a select group of major employers in the market area, as well. CHALLENGE: This effort included the review of changing market demographics and educational and enrollment data trends that directly impacted the University's academic offerings as they pertained to the needs of adult students and their academic goals and employment futures. SOLUTION: After identifying interest levels and preferences for various credit and noncredit education and training in the county, MGT developed demand estimates by program level for university planners to use in the market so the University could better the meet the needs of the population. Franklin University (OH) NEW PROGRAM NEEDS ASSESSMENT. Franklin University engaged MGT to conduct a market -wide assessment of degree program needs to identify potential F4 new programs for the immediate future. By reviewing and analyzing existing data and gathering input from key internal and external stakeholders in the metro area, FRANKLIN MGT identified those program opportunities that had the best potential for success and expansion and were compatible with the mission and strategic initiatives of UNIVIIRSITY the university. Maryland Higher Education Commission (MD) HIGHER EDUCATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT. The Maryland Higher Education Commission and the Montgomery County High Technology Council retained MGT to conduct a preliminary review of the need for additional upper division and graduate - level programs in Montgomery County. The effort included a review of current demographic characteristics and future projections of population, MHEC along with the current educational profile for residents in various locations MARYLAND HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION throughout the county. MGT also examined the most recent enrollment figures for Montgomery County residents and college participation rates, illustrating county and statewide comparative analyses. Substantial local community and business needs had been documented through independent assessment studies. MGT prepared a summation and review of these various efforts to determine their validity and to reach some consensus agreement on the overall perceived **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 14 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS needs for additional higher education. A review of current program activities at upper division and graduate level was completed as part of this process. Finally, MGT provided the Commission with estimates of future enrollment and the associated costs in terms of state funding allocations per FTE and the facility/space requirement costs that would be needed to fulfill the growth in upper division and graduate program enrollments. Based on our review, MGT provided the Commission with a series of recommendations concerning program changes and additions along with methods for meeting these needs in terms of facilities and institutional program participation. Minnesota Higher Education Coordinating Board (MN) NEEDS ASSESSMENT OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION. MGT, in cooperation with SRI International, conducted a comprehensive needs assessment for the Minnesota Higher Education Coordinating Board. This study focused on the postsecondary education needs of residents in a corridor between St. Cloud and Rochester, Minnesota. The project described current and future postsecondary education needs of Minnesota residents, evaluated resources available to meet these needs, and identified and analyzed alternative ways of preparing for the future. MGT staff surveyed educational interests and demand and conducted a capacity analysis of higher education facilities. Tasks included student surveys and focus groups, resident and employer interviews, and site visits to educational institutions. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (MN) NEEDS ASSESSMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION. The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (MnSCU) ,,_SOTA ST9 engaged MGT to conduct a comprehensive program needs assessment in the South I- 35 Corridor of southern Minnesota. The project included analysis of market demographics; the existing program inventory available locally; and input from a �LU cross-section of stakeholders, current higher education users, and potential students. MGT conducted personal interviews, focus groups, and survey research to determine perceptions, opinions, needs, and preferences regarding improved or enhanced access to programs and services. The analysis also included facility needs, capacity and space utilization at each of two existing sites in the region, and delivery options and management models for meeting current and projected higher education needs. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (MN) HIGHER EDUCATION NEEDS AND CAPACITY IN SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA. MGT ,SOTA ST9> was retained by the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (MNSCU) system office to conduct a program needs assessment and capacity study of the 19 -county r region of Southwest Minnesota. Currently served by Southwest Minnesota State University and Minnesota West Community and Technical College, the study wasGFs.:.,,Ur1 to collect information, data and stakeholder input from a variety of constituents to identify appropriate programs of need, and examine models to better align those needs, preferences, and delivery options with current MNSCU assets. The project incorporated secondary data along with original data collection through interviews, focus groups, and surveys of key business and community leaders, institutional representatives, students, employers, and local education officials. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 15 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Okaloosa-Walton College (FL) NEEDS ASSESSMENT IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION. MGT conducted a needs assessment in engineering education for the Joint Center of Okaloosa-Walton Community kaloosa-Walton College and the University of West Florida. The study included an Community College analysis of the status of engineering education at the technician, technologist, and engineer levels in Florida. MGT conducted an engineering education needs assessment based on surveys of local industries, interviews with community and business leaders, and an analysis of existing data and documents for the Greater Fort Walton Beach area. MGT presented a report, with suggestions as to the feasibility of extending engineering education opportunities to Northwest Florida through the Joint Center. Relevant experience gained from the project included: knowledge of preengineering and professional engineering programs in Florida; interviews with key business and industry leaders in the area; engineering education questionnaire development; large-scale survey administration; data analysis and reporting; and working with an advisory committee of community and educational leaders. Old Dominion University (VA) HIGHER EDUCATION CENTER MARKET ANALYSIS. Old Dominion University (ODU) retained MGT to conduct a market study of their Northern Virginia Higher Education Center in Loudoun County. Our OLD DOMINION team reviewed the population demographics, enrollment trends, and art ,, I } occupational outlook of the Center's service area, as well as the current programs available locally through ODU and other providers. MGT also collected input through interviews, surveys, and focus groups with current ODU students, internal stakeholders, community leaders, and business representatives. MGT identified program needs of the market area and gaps in program access or availability and prepared a review of customer needs and preferences for scheduling, location, delivery mode, and program type. Finally, our team conducted a review of the mechanisms, organizational structure, and processes that were currently employed to select and schedule programs at the Northern Virginia Center. All information was compiled in order to determine improvements and repositioning strategies for the Center's program offerings. Roanoke Higher Education Authority (VA) POSTSECONDARY EDUCATIONAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT. The local Higher Education Authority in ..d16. Roanoke, Virginia, engaged MGT to conduct a postsecondary ROANOKE educational needs assessment of the region. The study was sponsored HIGHER EDUCATION by a number of local, regional, and state higher education institutions CENTER currently active in the Roanoke area or seeking to expand into the region through outreach, extension, or distance learning initiatives. MGT provided a detailed analysis of local needs that would be served at a downtown education center, existing campuses, existing sites, or new locations in the region. The project was divided into three phases. The first phase consisted of a review of existing research, data, and studies on graduate, undergraduate, continuing education, and vocational technical education and workforce training. The second phase consisted of qualitative interviews with major local employers; discussion sessions with local employers; and discussion sessions with local employees, residents, students, and economic development representatives. The interviews, in addition to surveys, were designed to determine key postsecondary educational needs, including degree and nondegree course work, programs, and training. During the final phase of the assessment, MGT prepared a detailed set of **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 16 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS findings and conclusions and made recommendations for academic and training programmatic and service revisions or additions in the local area. MGT worked with a consortium of institutions to serve a variety of audiences and provide numerous levels of education and training to all facets of the population. MGT staff members employed a variety of delivery options and modes of instruction for the programs. MGT also used qualitative and quantitative original data collection to establish needs and preferences and to calculate demand estimates by level and type of education and training. Shenandoah University (VA) UNIVERSITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT. Shenandoah University in Winchester, Virginia, contracted MGT to conduct a preliminary program needs assessment for their Northern Virginia Campus located in Leesburg. MGT developed a set of questionnaires to identify higher SHENANDOAH education program needs and preferences at all levels from U N Iy E R S I T Y undergraduate and graduate to continuing education. MGT researchers conducted a series of telephone interviews with community leaders, local education officials, economic development professionals, and major business representatives in the service area around the Northern Virginia campus. Information was also collected and analyzed to examine barriers to higher education, preferred providers, and the desire for a multiple provider higher education center in the local market. MGT prepared a written summary of interview results and pending issues for University officials. South Carolina Commission on Higher Education (SC) NEEDS ASSESSMENT. The South Carolina Commission on Higher Education contracted with MGT to review the current Mission Resources Requirement Model (MRR), or funding formula, for public higher education. MGT developed a set of guiding principles and criteria to evaluate funding formulas. Comparisons of regional and national reports that address funding were performed to identify data definitions and determine clarity, consistency, and uniformity. MGT identified institutional peers and compared the funding of those institutions to funding for the South Carolina institutions. Analyses compared funding per student for each South Carolina institution to funding per student at the peer institutions and to the Southern Regional Education Board institutions of the same type. MGT compared the MRR to other funding formulas, and developed options and recommendations for revisions to the Model. MGT also evaluated current definitions, guidelines, and other information related to financial reporting and made recommendations for changes in definitions and reporting standards. State College and University System of West Virginia (WV) GRADUATE ENGINEERING NEEDS ASSESSMENT. MGT conducted a needs assessment for graduate engineering programs and related undergraduate and continuing education needs for the West Virginia State College and University System in Charleston, West Virginia. The project included a current inventory review of programs and courses at all levels for engineering -related topics and other areas of interest to those currently employed in engineering and engineering technology industries. MGT conducted a series of stakeholder interviews at institutions currently providing **i*i MGT CONSULTING GROUP CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 17 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS engineering courses in the state and with key business and industry leaders in a three -county area surrounding Charleston. The interviews helped the research team formulate a set of quantitative survey items that were distributed to a much larger sample of businesses to measure the demand for various engineering -related programs and training. MGT also developed lists of interest level, demand estimates, and program/training needs to help university academic officers, deans, and state system planners determine what programming changes would be best suited for residents, employers, and employees in the Charleston area. University System of Georgia (GA) HIGHER EDUCATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT - BLUE RIDGE AREA OF NORTH GEORGIA. The University OF TNS II/V System of Georgia (USG) retained MGT to conduct a higher education needs assessment across a multi -county are of north Georgia centered around Fannin © County and the City of Blue Ridge. The study documented current and future higher yeducation needs of residents, workers and employers, identified the extent of demand for underserved or unmet program needs, and explored options available 'OPOEOSO\Pand the fiscal viability of those to meet those needs. MGT's approach utilized a review of market demographic, economic, and educational data, and collection of stakeholder input at the state, USG, and community levels. In cooperation with the USG, we developed criteria for assessing options for improved access to higher education in the region. Following analysis and review of secondary data and comments from stakeholders, we evaluated the options based on the established criteria and provided a project report of findings and conclusions to the USG. University System of New Hampshire (NH) PROGRAM NEEDS ASSESSMENT. The University System of New Hampshire engaged MGT to conduct a needs assessment and Uuversity System market study for the College of Lifelong Learning as they plan for of New Han pshire future initiatives, revamped programming, and market repositioning. The MGT team reviewed existing population, enrollment, and job outlook data for the entire state and four service regions of the College. Review of the total program inventory for the University System, community/technical colleges, and private institutions was also undertaken to identify gaps and oversupply of programs at all levels. MGT collected input from a variety of internal and external stakeholders to USNH and CLL, including students, officials, local community leaders, and business representatives through focus groups, surveys, and interviews. Program opportunities were identified for CLL, including advantageous delivery models, locations, scheduling, and pricing options. Finally, MGT assisted USNH and CLL outline marketing strategies to reposition the institution in light of the needs assessment findings. Washington Higher Education Coordinating Board (WA) HIGHER EDUCATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT. The Washington State Legislature directed the Washington W A S H I N G T o N Higher Education Coordinating Board (HECB) to undertake a higher HI G H E R education needs assessment of the Snohomish, Island, and Skagit Counties area. MGT, in collaboration with NBBJ, was selected to EDUCATIONperform the following four major areas of study: 1. Assess the higher COORDINATING BOARD education needs in Snohomish, Island, and Skagit Counties. 2. Evaluate alternative organizational models for meeting identified needs and recommend the type of institution(s) to be established. 3. Assess sites for establishment of an institution. 4. Identify costs and process for **i*i MGT CONSULTING GROUP CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 18 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS completing a master plan for higher education expansion in the study area. MGT also worked with an advisory group consisting of state and local elected officials; community, business, or education leaders; and representatives of the higher education community in conducting the needs assessment. As directed by the Legislature in the study authorization, the HECB utilized the information prepared by MGT in submitting an interim report of preliminary findings to the Legislature and governor. Wyoming Community College Commission (WY) _b�"T COMMUNITY COLLEGE NEEDS ASSESSMENT. MGT conducted a WYOMING statewide program needs assessment for the Wyoming Community College Commission. MGT conducted a telephone COMMUNITY COLLEGES survey with a random sample of 1,200 adult residents to gather information on program, course, degree, noncredit, and continuing education opportunities and preferences from the general public and employers throughout the state. Statewide information as well as area and college -specific data were collected from respondents. Data on quality of existing programs and services provided by the seven colleges, accessibility information, convenience factors, and provider preference were examined. A statewide mail survey was completed with a sample of businesses. The sample was geographically dispersed across the state and represented varying industry and service types as well as size of company. The final results of all needs assessment activities were compiled in a comprehensive report to the Commission. It included a series of recommendations for possible improvements in the community college program and service functions from the citizen and business perspective. Each of the seven community colleges received a summary report of the study results that covered only their service area. These reports included college -specific recommendations. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 19 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS In addition to the descriptions above, MGT has also provided a chart that lists additional relevant Needs Assessment experience. Board of Regents, State of Iowa City of Federal Way (WA) Clarion University (PA) Des Moines Metro Area Higher Education Needs Assessment Higher Education Needs Assessment Market Study for University's Two -Year Venango Campus College of Charleston, the Citadel, and the Medical Tri -County Graduate Program Needs Assessment University of South Carolina College of DuPage (IL) District Program and Services Needs Assessment Study East Stroudsburg University (PA) Academic Program Market Analyses - Philadelphia Everett Chamber of Commerce (WA) Analysis of Postsecondary Needs Florida Gulf Coast University Program Needs Assessment Study Academic Program Needs Assessment Florida International University Franklin University (OH) New Program Needs Assessment and Program Feasibility Studies Hennepin Technical College (MN) Research and Planning for New Program Development Jamestown Community College (NY) Needs Assessment/Program Analysis Lake Washington Technical College Strategic Plan Maryland Higher Education Commission Frederick Regional Higher Education Needs Study Maryland Higher Education Commission Northeast Maryland Needs Assessment Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Regional and Statewide Assessments of Higher Education Program Needs Mission College (CA) Program Needs of Area Adult Learners and Employers Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning Assessment of Alternative Gulf Coast Campus Locations and Programs Nova Southeastern University (FL) Baccalaureate and Graduate Program Expansion Study Old Dominion University (VA) Branch Campus Program Needs Assessments Regional Economic Development, Inc. (MO) Workforce Development Study for Boone County, Missouri Rensselaer Polytechnic University (NY) Hartford (CT) Market Study Roanoke Higher Education Center (VA) Postsecondary Educational Needs Assessment Rockford Area Chamber of Commerce (IL) Assessment of Higher Education Needs Seattle University (WA) Environmental Scan Shenandoah University (VA) Northern Virginia Needs Assessment Spokane Community College District (WA) Program and Services Needs Survey in the Spokane Market South Puget Sound Community College (WA) New Lacey Campus Expansion Planning Sul Ross State University (TX) Educational Needs Assessment **i*i M GT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 20 2. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS PROJECTCLIENT Texas A&M University -Central Texas Center Higher Education Needs Assessment Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi Service Area Academic Program Needs Assessment Tidewater Community College (VA) Market Needs Surveys for Three TCC Campuses The McConnell Foundation (CA) Comprehensive Regional Higher Education Needs Assessment Redding/Northern California University Center of Lake County (IL) Assessment of Higher Education Needs University of Missouri -St. Louis Higher Education Needs Assessment University of North Florida Regional Graduate/Doctoral Program Needs University of Texas - Pan American Enrollment Management and Program Needs Assessment University of West Florida Study and Analysis of Emerald Coast Campus Operations and Programs University System of Georgia Blue Ridge Needs Assessment University System of Georgia Academic Program Needs Assessment - Douglasville, GA Academic Program Needs Assessment Griffin, GA University System of Georgia University System of New Hampshire Vincennes University (IN) Washington Higher Education Coordinating Board Washington State University Washington State University Waukesha County Action Network (WI) West Texas A&M University West Virginia State College and University System **i*i M GT CONSULTING GROUP Statewide Program Needs Assessment Evaluation of University Mission and Program Opportunities Postsecondary Education Needs Assessment King and Snohomish Counties Medical School Feasibility Study University Center of North Puget Sound County Postsecondary Education Needs Assessment Amarillo Center Program Needs Assessment Off -Campus Engineering Program and Continuing Education Needs CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 21 3. APPROACH AND WORKPLAN WORKPLAN The work plan is the document we use to monitor our activities internally and keep the planning process on schedule. It also serves as the basis from which Cape Girardeau Community College District's (CGCCD or the District) Project Manager can track progress. MGT has developed a set of key tasks/activities that are described on the following pages. The tasks encompass all the deliverables outlined and include the timeline to complete with associated deliverables. ACTIVITIES 1.1 Schedule and conduct initial project kickoff meeting via conference call with the District Project Officer and local representatives. 1.2 Review key project objectives, expectations, communication protocols, and reporting requirements. 1.3 Discuss timing of project data collection and stakeholder input activities relative to District member events/schedules, and the roles and responsibilities of the Project Officer and the MGT team. 1.4 Collect and review initial institutional data, recent survey data, prior reports, plans, and other source documents pertinent to the feasibility study and the target region. (MGT will submit a data request for source documents that are not available on the District's website.) 1.5 Finalize specific conditions, responsibilities, and time frames for site visits and project tasks. 1.6 Adjust work plan and corresponding timelines (if necessary) and submit for final approval. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 22 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 3. APPROACH AND WORKPLAN DELIVERABLE: • Project Initiation Conference Call • Final Work Plan and Schedule. ACTIVITIES 2.1 Utilizing the framework established in Task 1.2, MGT will work with the local representatives to compile and examine applicable program data from each of the constituent institutions currently serving the Cape Girardeau area. MGT utilizes tools such as EMSI and other proprietary data sources to find the latest economic and demographic trend data available. This data will include but be not limited to: • Occupational Openings estimates associated with the top 20 growth industries in Southeast Missouri, the State as a whole, as well as other states' workforce regions contiguous to the Cape region. • Applicable growth jobs in those top 20 industries to include forecasts by 2 -digit, 4 -digit, and 6 - digit 2020 SOC codes with crosswalks to CIP codes and/or NAICS codes across the above noted geographies. • Skill -sets (both technical and soft) needed for the top jobs in the identified growth industries. • Competitive landscape for community college degree and certificate programs preparing students for jobs in the identified growth industries. • Analysis of face -to face, hybrid, and online two-year degrees and certificate programs offered in Southeast Missouri, and contiguous out-of-state regions: — Institution offering the degree; — Degree program name; — Degree program description; — Enrollment trends; — Listed cost of attendance (application, tuition, and fees) — Specialty accreditation (if any) • Number of potential students in the Cape market area who completed high school but no college degree. • List of other colleges that currently serve Southeast Missouri area: and their two-year or certificate program portfolio, including — Institution offering the degree; — Degree program name; — Specialty accreditation (if any) **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 23 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 3. APPROACH AND WORKPLAN • Estimates of student interest for face -to face, hybrid, and online instructional/degree programs aligning with the identified top jobs in the top 20 identified industries. Recommendations for five to ten two-year degree programs or certificates with the most growth potential in the next five to ten years. 2.2 Other pertinent information as determined at project initiation can be gathered including: a) Other applicable postsecondary education providers serving the state. b) Reciprocity agreements with states adjacent to Southeast Missouri. c) Perceived barriers and obstacles to accessing higher education locally, and degree or goal completion. d) Initial community interest for new or expanded community college level academic programs and support services to meet local needs. 2.3 The MGT team will identify initial gaps in program inventory related to occupational projections and changing market conditions. DELIVERABLES • Data Inventory. • Additional Market Data Inventory. EMSI Analyst is a powerful tool that integrates real-time and traditional labor market data into one easy to use application including educational programs, occupations, industries, skills, job postings, and demographic data extracted from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the National Center for Education Statistics, multiple sources of online job postings and multiple sources for profile and resume posting including Linkedln. Search features offer basic options to advanced, in a format that is visually appealing and easy to use. Real-time data collects in demand skills from employer postings and professional profiles for comparison. The full text of job postings and underlying sources are available for analysis. Additionally, the data can be mined at the zip code and county level. The profile information also includes higher education alumni details. ACTIVITIES 3.1 Develop the various lists of key stakeholders from whom input will be gathered. Seek the assistance of business community, local students, and representatives of the general public to identify and schedule key individuals to be included. 3.2 Prepare protocols and instruments for each of the 3 data audience types. Seek the assistance of District representatives to clarify and edit the instruments to fully meet their goals. 3.3 Initiate 3 separate web surveys to gather feedback from three distinct sets of stakeholders: business community, local students, and the general public 3.4 Conduct a pre-test to ensure the quality of the instruments, including appropriate clarity, relevance, and length. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 24 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 3. APPROACH AND WORKPLAN DELIVERABLES Data collection methodology and plan • Draft survey instruments for each audience type • Final survey instrument in desktop and mobile format / Pre -survey planning. An effective timeline will allow adequate time for instrument development, data collection, and thorough analysis. Important decisions regarding target population include an analysis of the most effective instrument type, and accessibility for various populations. Pre -survey planning should also address details such as the criteria for removing "bad data" from the database, what to do with conflicting data, and responses entered in incorrect formats. / Target population considerations. After selecting a target population, issues such as how to contact group members, goal response levels, and sample size must be addressed. In general, the lower the response cost (difficulty of participating in the survey) and the higher the response interest, the better the response rate will be. However, the simple response rate (# valid responses/# valid invitations) should not guide decisions about the validity of data collected. Instead, the confidence level and interval should determine the goal number of responses. Doing so will allow the survey results to be discussed with known levels of confidence, which enables statistical inferences to the larger population. / Instrument design. Perhaps the single most important factor in surveying is the development of an effective and usable instrument design. Effective designs incorporate universal access and alternate response formats, avoid jargon, and use clearly expressed criteria and definitions for terms used. In addition, interactive surveys should begin and end with "Welcome" and "redirect" pages containing additional information such as directions for completing the survey, whom to contact with questions, whether the survey results will be made publicly available, and how to request copies of study reports, if available. / Follow up. Timely follow up is critical to achieve goal response levels. While the survey is active, a member of the research group must be prepared to respond to user comments and questions (e.g., providing alternate response formats, answering specific questions relating to test security). Additionally, reminders to participate in the survey may increase response rates, when distributed appropriately ACTIVITIES 4.1 Initiate three separate web surveys to gather feedback from three distinct sets of stakeholders: business community, local students, and the general public. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 25 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 3. APPROACH AND WORKPLAN 4.2 Manage all aspects of survey administration including design, methods, sampling, and monitoring. 4.3 Provide the project team with regular updates of number of respondents. 4.4 Send follow-up email communications to participants to access and complete the survey. 4.5 Work closely with team to ensure highest possible response rate. 4.6 Manage all data coding and analysis including "cleaning" data elements, such as parse and standardize; match and consolidate; correct and update; address data gaps; review; and update. 4.7 Compile reports that summarize the key findings and include summary charts and tables. Indicate the statistical significance of any differences reported in the findings. 4.8 Summarize results of stakeholder input, including key issues, challenges, opportunities, and priorities. 4.9 Use appropriate data analysis techniques to identify organizational strengths, threats and areas of improvement that can help inform training and development. 4.10 Use appropriate levels of analysis reflective of the different constituent groups. DELIVERABLES • Data summaries (initial review and validation of data) • Preliminary report on the validation of the data collected ACTIVITIES 5.1 The MGT team will consolidate qualitative and quantitative data on industry trends and forecasts, programmatic needs, current and future strategic enrollment estimates, existing program inventories, population characteristics and projections, and other factors that may increase or depress the potential demand for specific programs. 5.2 The MGT team will assist the District in consideration of immediate and projected needs of the state as well as the impact of any relevant programmatic planning elements best -practices. 5.3 From survey, interview, and market data research, identify programmatic, and strategic needs and opportunities for new programs, as well as existing program expansion. This information will assist the District in preparation of a plan to meet those capital needs consistent with program strategies and objectives. 5.4 Finally, an initial list of program opportunities will be identified with relative demand indicators to respond to the reported interests, needs, preferences, barriers, obstacles, conditions, and competition. 5.5 Prepare a report of the study methodology, findings, and supporting data identifying needs for new or expanded academic degrees and programs. 5.6 Develop a list of potential needs to consider for appropriate recommendation options. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 26 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 3. APPROACH AND WORKPLAN 5.7 Submit a draft report for review and comments. 5.8 Following review of the draft report by District representatives, make revisions and edits as appropriate and deemed necessary. 5.9 Deliver the final report by November 30, 2020. 5.10 OPTIONAL: Make a virtual presentation of study findings. DELIVERABLE • Draft and Final Study Report. • Optional virtual presentation ACTIVITIES 6.1 Weekly check-in meetings with the District via skype or in person if corresponding with other tasks in the workplan. 6.2 Manage the project in concert with District stakeholders to ensure smooth communication and quality control. 6.3 Work with the District to designate a single client -side point of contact and establish understanding of contextual constraints and opportunities. MGT CLIENT SATISFACTION COMPONENTS Initial Project Responsiveness and Flexible to Planning Client Concerns Assignment of Quality Staff 6.4 Apply various project management methods and Communi techniques Througho Project Li 6.5 Establish a framework of firm timelines and milestones with the District, based on unique circumstances and needs. DELIVERABLES • Regular Communication and Updates • Deliverable Quality Control Timely Performance :y Review ;h arative ice Analysis **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 27 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 3. APPROACH AND WORKPLAN TIMELINE **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 28 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 4. THE MGT TEAM STAFF QUALIFICATIONS AND RESUMES Below we present the organizational structure for our team. The Project Director, Karinda Barrett, PhD, will be responsible for ensuring all of our team's contractual obligations are met on time and within budget. He will participate in on-site visits and qualitative stakeholder input opportunities, and well as direct the development of the final assessment report. PROJECT TEAM ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES The assignment and related responsibilities of project team members are provided below. MGT assumes the District Project Officer will hold the following responsibilities: • Overall project guidance and directions • Primary responsibility and final authority over all activities • Approval of the contract, work plan, and final report • Receive and distribute all project correspondence, progress reports, and final reports to other key stakeholders **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 29 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 4. THE MGT TEAM The MGT Executive -in -Charge holds the following responsibilities: • Ensuring MGT fulfills all contractual requirements. • Managing resources appropriately • Resolving any conflicts during the project or point of escalation for any challenges • Final authority over project deliverables The MGT Project Director holds the following responsibilities: • Main point of contact for the District • Day to day management of the project tasks and deliverables • Oversight over service and deliverable quality • Management of all project deadlines. • Maintains frequent contact with the District Project Officer throughout the lifecycle of the project. The consultant team holds the following responsibilities: • Work closely with the District under the direction of the Project Director to carry put the various tasks and deliverables. • Utilize individual subject matter expertise to customize and execute each work task and fulfill the District's stated expectations. • Conduct collection and analysis of relevant data, including professional development • Review, document, evaluate, and generate recommendations in accordance with each component of the work plan. STAFF RESUMES AND EXPERIENCE By selecting the MGT team, Cape Girardeau Community College District can be assured there are no weak links and that each team member possesses unique knowledge and skills that, when combined, produce a well-rounded and qualified team capable of handling all aspects of this study. Resumes for assigned personnel are presented on the following pages. Team members shall remain available during the entirety of the project throughout the term of the contract as long as they are employed by MGT. The personnel described in our proposal are the professionals who will provide the services for this project. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 30 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 4. THE MGT TEAM MELANIE HICKS, PhD Vice President, Education Solutions MGT CONSULTING GROUP Dr. Hicks has nearly two decades of PK12 and Higher Education experience. In her role at MGT, she leads business development for the Education Solutions Group, while serving as Executive In Charge of over 50+ projects and a 14 person staff. Prior to joining MGT, Dr. Hicks served as Assistant Provost and Director of Sponsored Programs for the University of Tampa (UT) where she created UT's first Office of Sponsored Programs, led campus wide faculty initiatives, and assisted with the development and mentoring efforts of the UT Lowth Center for Entrepreneurship. Additionally, she was a member of the master planning and budgeting senior staff committee, responsible for 52 academic department budgets and more than $15M in restricted funds. Finally, she led strategic assessments and return -on -investment evaluations on both the operating and capital needs of campus programs. Prior to joining UT, she founded InPursuit Consulting and Research Institute offering consulting on strategic planning, organizational development, grant writing/implementation, and advocacy volunteer training in the fields of entrepreneurial and small business, start-ups, and nonprofits. Dr. Hicks also previously served as the Director of Research for the Independent Colleges and Universities of Florida (ICU F), and concurrently as the Managing Director of the Florida Independent College Fund (FICF). Dr. Hicks began her career in local and state government policy advocacy working on behalf of clients before the Miami -Dade County Commission and eventually moving to Tallahassee to become the first Aide to Mayor John Marks. While in Tallahassee, she served as a special projects coordinator with the State Legislatures' Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability and as an adjunct professor of Public Administration for Florida State University and Barry University. Among her published works is a chapter in Moc Ideja, a grassroots policy manual written for policymakers in Bosnia and funded by the U.S. Department of State. She also has numerous works on psychological contract theory. AREAS OF EXPERTISE Market Analysis Strategic planning and organizational development Needs assessment Program/Grant evaluation Public policy and advocacy Instructional design, training, and teaching EDUCATION Ph.D., Askew School of Public Administration and Policy, Florida State University, 2007 M.P.A., Public Administration, Business emphasis, University of Miami, 2002 B.A., Organizational Communications; minor Public Administration, University of Central Florida, 2000 Business Certificate, Harvard Business School, 2017 RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE - MGT Higher Education American University at Virginia State (VA) I Online MBA Feasibility Study Bowie State University (MD) I Student Housing Study College of Lake County (IL) I Market Demand Study Colorado State University (CO) I Technology Strategic Plan Chicago State University (IL) Strategic Planning Guilford Technical Community College (NC) I Training Henderson State University (AR) I Student Housing Study InterAmerican University of Puerto Rico (PR) I Market Demand Study Research Corporation of University of Hawaii (HI) Early Childhood Facilities Evaluation and Cost Analysis State College of Florida (FL) Strategic Planning SUNY Stony Brook University (NY) I Student Housing Study Towson University (MD) I Student Housing Study University of Louisiana, Lafayette (LA) Student Housing Study University of Nebraska, Kearney (NE) I Student Housing Study **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 31 4. THE MGT TEAM Louisiana State University (LA) I Student Housing Study Northwest Florida State College (FL) I Student Housing Study Nova Southeastern University (FL) I Health Professions Division Expansion Feasibility Analysis; Risk Assessment Palm Beach Atlantic (FL) I Student Housing Study Palm Beach State College (FL) I Needs Assessment Texas A&M University (TX) Strategic Planning University of Nevada, Las Vegas I Strategic Planning and New Program Development PK12 Education Gary Community School Corporation (IN) I School Turnaround, Communications Hamilton County Schools (TN) Facilities Master Plan Jefferson County Schools (CO) Policy Review Laramie County Schools (WY) Strategic Plan Millington Municipal Schools (TN) I Facilities Master Plan RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE— PRIOR MGT CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) I Advocacy Training Children's Athletic Network and Dance Opportunities Organizational Turnaround CrimeStoppers of Florida I Advocacy Training EduMatrix I Grant Evaluation Elite Fire I Fundraising Eunoia Collective I Grant Writing Florida Holocaust Museum I Grant Writing Florida Independent College Fund I Program Needs Assessment General Board of Higher Education Ministry I Higher Education Benchmark Study Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Strategic Plan MELANIE HICKS, PhD Vice President, Education Solutions MGT CONSULTING GROUP University of North Carolina System (NC) I Needs Assessment University of Northern Iowa (IA) I Student Housing Study University of Tennessee (TN) I Needs Assessment University of Texas, EI Paso (TX) Strategic Planning University of Texas, Corpus Christi (TX) Strategic Planning Portland Public Schools (OR) Educational Suitability Assessment Shelby County Schools (TN) Charter School Review Research Corporation of University of Hawaii I Early Childhood Facilities Evaluation and Cost Analysis Needs Assessment Wake County Schools (NC) I Instructional Review Habitat for Humanity, Pasco County I Strategic Plan Habitat for Humanity, Pinellas County I Strategic Plan Habitat for Humanity, Sarasota I Strategic Plan Heart Gallery, Pinellas and Pasco I Strategic Plan Horn Lake High School I Fundraising MomPreneur I Copy Editing Patel Campaign for County Commission Communications Advisor Rowan University I Grant writing SEEDSPOT I Workshop/Event Facilitator University Area Community Development Corporation I Grant Writing University of South Florida I Copy Editing WORK EXPERIENCE MGT Consulting Group, Vice President, Education Solutions Group, May 2018 -Present InPursuit Research Institute, Principal, 2010 -April 2018 Children's Athletic Network and Dance Opportunities, CEO, 2016-2017 The University of Tampa, Assistant Provost, 2011- 2016 Florida Independent College Fund, Managing Director, 2007-2011 Independent Colleges and Universities of Florida (ICUF), Director of Research Programs, 2005-2011 City of Tallahassee, Aide to the Mayor, 2002-2005 Office of Program Policy Analysis and Governmental Accountability, Project Coordinator, 2002-2003 Bercow and Radell, PA, Legal and Policy Researcher, 2000-2002 **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 32 4. THE MGT TEAM MICHAEL RAISOR, Ph.D., MBOE, LSSBB Senior Vice President of Client Services for Education Solutions Group MGT OF AMERICA CONSULTING, LLC Dr. Michael Raisor is a proven executive and dynamic leader with 24 years of experience. He has a breadth and depth of experience and knowledge in leading effective teams with his extensive project management experience.He is both a strategic thinker and tactical practitioner with a track record of success. Dr. Raisor focuses on relationship -building, collaborating, and communicating as pathways to successful project management. He is committed to innovation, entrepreneurial thinking, and world class systems. In his leadership in school systems, he has led by creating well -articulated processes and being systems -focused. He also considers decisions by focusing on the core impact of the work and remembering that long term reward is more important than short term gain. Dr. Raisor is a Lean Six Sigma Black Belt with a strong business foundation specializing in operational excellence, systems thinking, change management, and performance improvement. AREAS OF EXPERTISE • Project management • Lean Six Sigma Black Belt • Change management EDUCATION EXECUTIVE EDUCATION Masters of Business Operational Excellence (MBOE), Ohio The National Institute for Urban School Leaders — Harvard State University, 2011 Graduate School of Education (2008) Ph.D., Educational Leadership, Indiana State University, 2011 Ed.S., Educational Leadership, Indiana State University, 2008 M.S., Educational Leadership, Indiana University, 2001 B.S., Social Science Education, Indiana State University, 1995 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Indianapolis Public Schools (IN) I Facility and Academic Suitability Assessments Hamilton County Schools (TN) I Facilities Master Plan The Turnaround Leadership Program — University of Virginia Darden School of Business (2008) Disney's Approach to Leadership Excellence — The Disney Institute (2011) Taking People With You — YUM! Brands Executive Training ( 2013 ) The Public Education Leadership Project— Harvard Business School (2014) Executive Management Program — McDonough School of Business Georgetown University (2015) Shelby County Schools (TN) I Charter School Review Research Corporation of University of Hawaii I Early Childhood Facilities Evaluation and Cost Analysis Needs Assessment WORK EXPERIENCE Jefferson County Public Schools, Chief Operations Officer, March 2012 — November 2019 Bellarmine University, Adjunct Faculty, Annsley Frazier Thorton School of Education, August 2013 — May 2014 Indiana State University, Special Faculty, Bayh College of Education, April 2012 — May 2015 Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation, Executive Director, Office of Operational Excellence, October 2011— March 2012 Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation, Deputy Chief Operating Officer, Office of Operations, July 2010 — September 2011 Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation, Project Manager, Office of Superintendent, November 2009 —January 2012 **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 33 4. THE MGT TEAM MICHAEL RAISOR, Ph.D., MBOE, LSSBB Senior Vice President of Client Services for Education Solutions Group MGT OF AMERICA CONSULTING, LLC Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation, Social Studies Teacher, Perry Heights Middle Schools, July 2001—June 2005 Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation, Principal/Assistant Principal, Harwood Middle Schools — Title I, July 2005— June 2010 Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation, American Government Teacher, Harwood Middle Schools —Title I, July 2005— June 2010 Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation, Social Studies Teacher, Lanesville Junior/Senior High I, July 2005—June 2010 **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 34 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT 4. THE MGT TEAM ♦ ♦ R. RAY THOMPSON, Ph.D. ♦ ♦ ♦ Vice President, Higher Education Services MGT CONSULTING GROUP Dr. Thompson has been serving the firm's higher education clients for nearly four decades. He specializes in studies utilizing both qualitative and quantitative research methods for planning college and university student services. His work at MGT has encompassed a wide range of program planning and market research - oriented applications for entities across the country. Dr. Thompson has directed or participated in more than 500 project engagements. He has planned and coordinated the market analysis and stakeholder research activities for many of those projects. His work at MGT has encompassed a wide range of strategic planning applications including program planning and market research -oriented services for higher education institutions and education -related entities across the country. These projects include institution -wide strategic plans, academic program needs assessments, market analyses, marketing and enrollment management reviews, facility space planning, auxiliary services and student services needs, and institutional or program image and awareness. Aix Dr. Thompson has worked with a number of local interests and higher education institutions to explore indicators and options for making higher education (both undergraduate and graduate level programs, credit and non-credit options) available in locations with limited or no direct access. During his tenure with MGT, Dr. Thompson has developed and refined the assessment model MGT now employs for academic program needs and market studies. In addition, he has led hundreds of focus group, small group discussions and input sessions for college and university planning as well as customer and stakeholder research. AREAS OF EXPERTISE Stakeholder Engagement Qualitative and Quantitative Research Strategic Planning EDUCATION Ph.D., Communications, Florida State University, 1983 M.S., Communications, Florida State University, 1978 B.S., Social Psychology, Florida State University, 1975 RELEVANT PROJECTS Alcorn State University (MS) I Multistage Educational Needs Assessment Central Texas College District I Strategic Planning College of Charleston Needs Assessment of Graduate Programs College of DuPage (IL) Needs Assessment Study Market Demand Facility Assessments Academic Program Needs Assessments PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Association of Public Opinion Research American Marketing Association Association for Institutional Research Association of College and University Housing Officers— International Market Research Association Society for College and University Planning Southeastern Association for Community College Research Southern Association for Institutional Research Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (NY) I Downtown Hartford Comprehensive Market Study Rochester Community and Technical College (MN) Strategic Planning Services Southern Connecticut State University I Market Research Study **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 35 4. THE MGT TEAM Education Coalition Task Force of the Cape Girardeau Chamber of Commerce (MO) I Needs Assessment and Market Study Florida Gulf Coast University I Program Needs Assessment Florida International University I Program Needs Assessment Study Florida State University I Comprehensive Study of the Medical Education System in Florida Florida State University Medical Education Programs Expansion Study Franklin University (OH) Program Needs Assessment Illinois Board of Higher Education I Assessment of Higher Education Needs Iowa Board of Regents I Graduate Center Feasibility Study Maryland Higher Education Commission I Higher Education Needs Assessment Minnesota Higher Education Coordinating Board I Needs Assessment of Postsecondary Education Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Comprehensive Program Needs Assessment; Higher Education Needs and Capacity in Southwest Minnesota; Statewide Assessment of Graduate Programs Needs Norfolk State University (VA) Strategic Planning Old Dominion University (VA) Program Needs Assessments of Three Regional Campuses Franklin University (OH) I Needs Assessment and Market Study Fort Valley State University (GA) I Strategic Plan Development Palm Beach State College (FL) I Strategic Plan Development University of Arkansas Pine Bluff I Strategic Plan Development Texas A&M Corpus Christi Needs Assessment and Market Study Alabama A&M University Strategic Plan Development Arkansas Tech University Campus Master Plan FSU College of Medicine (FL) I Socio -Economic Impact Study College of Western Idaho I CTE Program Needs Assessment University System of Georgia I Graduate Program Needs Assessment R. RAY THOMPSON, Ph.D. Vice President, Higher Education Services MGT CONSULTING GROUP Southwest Missouri State University I Program Needs Assessment Study Sul Ross University (TX) I Comprehensive Needs Assessment and Educational Market Analysis Tarleton State University, Central Texas Center I Market Analysis and Academic Needs Assessment The University System of New Hampshire's College of Lifelong Learning I Needs Assessment and Market Study University Center of Lake County (IL) I Community Needs Assessment of Higher Education University of Central Florida I Medical School Needs Analysis University of Missouri System I Educational Needs Assessment University of Missouri I Higher Education Feasibility Study University of North Florida I Needs Assessment Study University of Southern Mississippi I Comprehensive Planning Project for the Gulf Coast Campus University of Virginia and Virginia Tech I Market Assessment of Higher Education Needs Virginia State University I Strategic Planning Washington Higher Education Coordinating Board Postsecondary Education Needs Assessment West Texas A&M University I Amarillo Market Analysis and Needs Assessment West Virginia State College and University System I Needs Assessment of Graduate Engineering Programs University of Houston I new Medical School Business Plan Washington State University I New Medical School Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study University of North Carolina System —System -Wide STEM Program Capacity Study University of Texas EI Paso I Strategic Plan Development Western Washington University I Needs Assessment and Market Study Off -Campus Center University System of Georgia I Needs Assessment and Market Study Off -Campus Centers Kennebec Valley Community College (ME) I Economic Impact Study Harford Community College (MD) I Needs Assessment and Market Study Off -Campus Center Iowa Board of Regents I Des Moines Market Study and Program Needs Assessment **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 36 4. THE MGT TEAM KARINDA BARRETT, Ph.D. Senior Consultant, Education Solutions Group MGT CONSULTING GROUP Dr. Barrett has over 25 years of higher education, policy development, faculty and professional development, and strategic planning including student housing planning experience. Previously, Dr. Barrett served as the Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Services with the Division of Florida Colleges. For eleven years, she worked at Tallahassee Community College, first as an Instructional Technologist and then as the Director of the Center for Professional Enrichment. Prior to her work at TCC, she was the Associate Director of the Hardee Center for Women in Higher Education and served as an advisor at the Center for Advising Undeclared Students during her graduate work. She also was an Area Coordinator for Residence Life at Western Carolina University and a Residence Education Coordinator at the University of South Carolina. Dr. Barrett has enjoyed teaching face-to-face and online courses for numerous colleges and universities. She has also written articles on teaching styles in the online learning environment which have been published in peer-reviewed journals. Additionally, her consulting work includes a strategic plan development project for the Florida State University College of Medicine. Dr. Barrett has engaged in a variety of projects where she collected stakeholder input through multiple channels such as interviews, focus groups, workshops, and surveys. She has worked with constituents, staff, parents, families, employers, advisory boards, and a variety of other local, regional, and national stakeholders to curate essential feedback, insight, and input as the most effective way to inform projects through original, primary research. AREAS OF EXPERTISE • Policy Development • Strategic Planning • Faculty and Professional Development EDUCATION Ph.D. Higher Education, Department of Educational Leadership, Florida State University, December 2004 M.Ed., Educational Leadership and Policies Department, University of South Carolina, May 1994 B.S., Business Administration, University of South Carolina, December 1990 5G Leadership Certification, Alpha UMi, August 2019 Certificate, Certified College Professional, Association of Florida Colleges, November 2012 Certificate, Strengths Advocate, Clifton Strengths School, Gallup University, July 2011 Certificate, Online Instructional Development, Educational Psychology and Learning Systems Department, Florida State University, May 2001 • Stakeholder Engagement • Process Improvement • Student Housing PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS National Institute of Staff and Organizational Development, Liaison, 2008-2015 Florida Faculty Development Consortium, Steering Committee Member, 2005-2008, Chair, 2008-2011 Southern Regional Faculty Instructional Developer Consortium, Executive Committee Member, 2007-2009 Florida Association of Community Colleges, TCC Chapter, Publications Co -Chair, 2005-2006 Florida Distance Learning Consortium, Faculty Development Committee, Member, 2004-2005 Tallahassee Community College Women's History Planning Committee, Member, 2004-2007 RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE - MGT Higher Education Guilford Technical Community College (NC) I Training University of Georgia (GA) I Student Housing Study Mercer County Community College (NJ) I Student Housing Study College of Lake County (IL) I Market Study Inter American U of Puerto Rico (FL) I Feasibility/Impact Palm Beach State College (FL) I Needs Assessments University of Nevada, Las Vegas (NV) I Strategic Planning Chicago State University (IL) I Strategic Planning Services **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 37 4. THE MGT TEAM College of Western (ID) I Needs Assessment PK12 Education Beaufort County School District (SC) I Organizational Review Atlanta Public Schools (GA) (sub: Parsons) I Fac Assessment Update Henry County Schools (GA) I Enrollment Projections State Government Oregon Health Insurance Marketplace (OR) I Demographics Study Florida Legislature OPPAGA (FL) I Staffing and Efficiency Study KARINDA BARRETT, Ph.D. Senior Consultant, Education Solutions Group MGT CONSULTING GROUP RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE — PRIOR TO MGT Tallahassee Community College (FL) I Leadership and Professional Development for Faculty and Staff Tallahassee Community College (FL) I Advanced Leadership and Professional Development for Faculty and Staff Tallahassee Community College (FL) I Development and Implementation of Provost's Leadership Academy Tallahassee Community College (FL) I Development and Implementation of the Starfish Student Success Initiative WORK EXPERIENCE — PRIOR TO MGT Florida Department of Education, Division of Florida Colleges, Florida College System, Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Affairs, 2015 — 2019 Tallahassee Community College, Director, Center for Teaching, Learning and Leadership, 2005 — 2015; Instructional Technologist, Center for Instructional Technology, 2004 — 2005 Florida State University, Hardee Center for Women in Higher Education, Associate Director, 2001— 2002; Center for Advising Undeclared Students, Academic Advisor, 1999 — 2000 Tallahassee Community College, Coordinator - Hardee Assistantship, College Reach Out Program, 1998 —1999 Western Carolina University, Area Coordinator, University Housing and Residence Life, 1994-1998 University of South Carolina, Residence Education Coordinator, Residence Life, 1993 —1994 **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 38 4. THE MGT TEAM Ms. Rachel Jones is an experienced higher education leader with a demonstrated history of working in the education management industry. As a director and academic dean, she led initiatives that resulted in increased student engagement, persistence, and overall success within the online learning space. This includes running the Curricular Affairs Department, overseeing the development and RACHEL JONES Consultant MGT CONSULTING GROUP maintenance of 100+ online courses, supporting research and innovative pilots, and fostering meaningful strategic partnerships which resulted in significant institution - wide cost savings. Ms. Jones is skilled in Operational Leadership, Sales Management, Strategic Partnerships, Curriculum Development, Educational Technology, and Instructional Design. As a visionary innovator, she concentrates results by partnering with her clients for results -driven, learner -centered solutions. She is a highly motivated leader with strong emotional intelligence and proven success surpassing goals. AREAS OF EXPERTISE • Team Leadership and growth • Curriculum and program development • Technology integration and learning management EDUCATION M.A, Reading Education, K-12, Stetson Univesity, 2012, with ESOL Endorsement B.A., Elementary Education, K-6, Purdue University, 2006, with Reading Endorsement WORK EXPERIENCE Dean, Curricular Affairs 06/2019 — 01/20 1 Ultimate Medical Academy - Tampa, FL Director, Curriculum Operations 05/2016-06/2019 Ultimate Medical Academy — Tampa, FL Learning Technology Account Manager 2013 — 2016 Pearson Education —Tampa, FL Learning Ambassador 2007 — 2013 1 School District of Osceola County — Osceola, FL PUBLICATIONS CERTIFICATIONS Education Technology Insights, Technology Powers 5 Generation Power Skills Soft Skills Education for Better Patient Experiences. Earned 25 micro -badges and overarching power skills badge Rachel Jones, October, 2019 Crucial Conversations Completed 3 -day training and follow-up sessions Quality Matters Certifications Completed 12 courses and 20+ webinar training sessions focused on instructional design best practices **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 39 4. THE MGT TEAM KASEY M. PRICE, Ed.D. Senior Consultant MGT CONSULTING GROUP Dr. Price has engaged in a variety of student housing projects, including master Pr "Mmmmm" planning, feasibility studies, and public-private partnership investments. Her work is conducted through multiple channels, such as market research, campus data analysis, interviews, focus groups, workshops, and surveys. She has worked with constituents, staff, students, foundations, investors, and a variety of other local, regional, and national stakeholders to curate essential feedback, insight, and input while ensuring responsible handling of participant responses. Dr. Price has over 15 years of experience in higher education administration including student housing, executive leadership and student affairs. Prior to returning to MGT, Dr. Price served as the Assistant Vice Chancellor for Student Life and Leadership and Director of Development for Student Affairs at Purdue University Fort Wayne. In her previous role, she was responsible for managing special projects for the Division of Student Affairs, including program assessment, fundraising, grant writing, implementation of campus dining, and state-wide conference planning. Her areas of experience including housing and residential education, leadership education, student activities, student communications, and student affairs development. She has experience with state and federal programs, including McNair Scholars, Illinois Louis Stokes for Minority Participation, TRiO, Indiana Campus Compact, National Student Exchange Program, Indiana National Guard, and managing the Jon C. Dalton Institute on College Student Values. She has also served as an investigator for Title IX cases of harassment, discrimination, and sexual assault. Additionally, Dr. Price provided on-site leadership education to students and faculty in Taiwan and has also privately met with the Taiwan Ministry of Education to promote international education opportunities for students in the United States. Dr. Price has served on leadership teams for program evaluation, campus master planning and renovation projects, IT and website development, and classification and compensation reviews. She has experience working with national data sets including NSSE, IPEDS, Noel -Levitz, and the US Census. Dr. Price has prior work experience at small private, mid-sized regional, and large public institutions. AREAS OF EXPERTISE • Student Housing • Needs Assessments • Qualitative and Quantitative Research • Leadership Training and Education • Grant Acquisition, Administration, and Evaluation EDUCATION Ed.D., Educational Leadership and Policy Studies - Higher Education, Florida State University, 2010 Graduate Certificate, Institutional Research, Florida State University, 2009 M.S.Ed., Higher Education - College Student Personnel, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 2007 B.S., Business Administration and Intercultural Studies, Indiana Wesleyan University, 2004 PROJECT EXPERIENCE [WITH MGT] Indianapolis Public Schools — Facilities Master Plan Indianapolis Public Schools — Pathway Design Technical Assistance Guilford Technical Community College —Training Longwood University— Financial Accountability Analysis Bowie State University — Student Housing Market Study Bowie State University — Stakeholder Survey **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT PAGE 40 4. THE MGT TEAM KASEY M. PRICE, Ed.D. Senior Consultant MGT CONSULTING GROUP College of Western Idaho — Needs Assessment Chicago State University — Strategic Plan Wake County Public Schools— Performance/ Efficiency Review Oregon Health Insurance Marketplace — Demographics Study University of Texas, EI Paso — Strategic Plan Research Corporation of University of Hawaii — Preschool Development Grant Birth Through Five Facilities Assessment Appalachian State University—Student Housing Study Hamilton Department of Education — Facilities Master Plan University of Georgia — Student Housing Market Study Inter American University of Puerto Rico — Market Demand Study University of Nebraska — Kearney — Student Housing Demand Study University of Washington — Program Evaluation Mercer County Community College — Student Housing Market Study West Chester University—Student Housing Demand Study College of Lake County — Market Study PRIOR MGT PROJECT EXPERIENCE (2007-20 1 0) Cape Girardeau Coalition Task Force Higher Education Needs Assessment Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi - Academic Program Needs Assessment North Carolina A&T State University - Evaluation of the role of the Center for Academic Excellence West Texas A&M University - Higher Education Needs Assessment Tarleton State University - Central Texas - Higher Education Needs Assessment State University of New York at Plattsburgh - Residence Hall Master Plan Northern Kentucky University - Housing Analysis Western Kentucky University - Market Research for Graduate Student and Family Housing Western Kentucky University - Market Research for Undergraduate Student Housing North Carolina Central University - Comprehensive Plan for Student Housing University of Georgia - Market Research for Student Housing WORK EXPERIENCE Adjunct Faculty Member, St. Cloud State University, 2019-2020 Assistant Vice Chancellor for Student Life and Leadership, Purdue University Fort Wayne, 2014 —2019 Director of Development for Student Affairs (Part -Time), Purdue University Fort Wayne, 2017 —2019 Director of Special Projects — Student Activities, Indiana - Purdue University Fort Wayne, 2010 —2014 Indiana Wesleyan University, Student Dev Counseling & Administration, Adjunct Faculty, 2011-2014 Florida State University, Office of the Vice President of Student Affairs, Graduate Assistant, 2009 - 2010 MGT of America, Inc. (Now MGT Consulting Group), Research Associate, 2007 - 2010 Florida State University, Women in Math, Science & Engineering LLC, Program Assistant, 2007 - 2008 Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Graduate Hall Director, 2005 - 2007 Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Campus Housing Activity Fee Assistant, 2006 - 2007 Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Student Judicial Affairs, Hearing Officer Intern, 2006 - 2007 Southern Illinois University Carbondale, McNair Scholars Program, Graduate Advisor, 2006 Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Illinois Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation, Intern, 2006 **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 41 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT S. COST PROPOSAL We establish fees for a project of this type as fixed fee by task, billed monthly as percent complete of each task. The flat rate fee for the project is $98,375, which includes professional fees and direct expenses. The budget illustrates the cost to conduct the project by the work tasks presented in the proposed work plan. **i*i MGT CAPE GIRARDEAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I AUGUST 12, 2020 PAGE 42 CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSAL I NEEDS ASSESSMENT Educational Needs Analysis of the Cape Girardeau Area plopt" Volume I: Final Report Submitted to: Cape Girardeau Area Chamber of Commerce Education Coalition Task Force Submitted by: MGT of America, Inc. 2123 Centre Pointe Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32308 March 25, 2009 Educational Needs Analysis of the Cape Girardeau Area Volume I: Final Report Submitted by: MGT;;;E OF AMERICA, INC. 2123 Centre Pointe Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32308 MGT of America, Inc. expresses its appreciation to the members of the Cape %r �-T-RdIGirardeau Area Chamber of Commerce and the Cape Girardeau Coalition Task Force for their assistance and participation during the course of this study. G eed°°u We gratefully acknowledge the special contributions of the following members of the Cape Girardeau community in support of this project: • Benton Hill Investment Co. • Cape Girardeau Area Chamber of Commerce • Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center • Drury Hotels • First Missouri State Bank • MidAmerica Hotels Corporation • Mineral Area College • Southeast Missourian • Southeast Missouri Hospital • Southeast Missouri State University • Three Rivers Community College ColK (:9nude.nr 1M., Clmndwr off'—m— (DRURY HOTELS The Extras Aren't Extra RRST ,,,W41�7ffissnfffil STATE BANK MIDANIERICA HOTELS CORPORATION Mineral Area College _WMEF Sttv3ng Ci--idcx Since 1922 Ap- Southeast Ho P, 1. Southeast Missouri (tate University_ U T H EAST MISSOURIAN In particular, we would like to thank the following individual coalition task force members for their time and effort to encourage cooperation and input during the community research phase: • Tonya Buttry • Ken Dobbins • Bob Hahn • Steve Kurtz • John Mehner • Earl Norman • Rich Payne • Joe Rozman • Gary Rust • Dennis Vollink TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Background..............................................................................................1-1 1.2 Key Issues................................................................................................1-2 1.3 Study Objectives......................................................................................1-3 1.4 Report Outline..........................................................................................1-4 2.0 MARKET CONDITIONS AFFECTING DEMAND FOR POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION......................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Population Trends and Projections..........................................................2-1 2.2 High School Enrollments and Graduation Rates.....................................2-5 2.3 Postsecondary Education Attainment, Participation, and Enrollment Trends.............................................................................2-8 2.4 Economic Trends and Projections.........................................................2-12 2.5 Summary and Conclusions....................................................................2-20 3.0 CURRENT SUPPLY OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION TO THE LOCAL MARKET........................................................................................3-1 3.1 Brief Description of Each Local Provider..................................................3-1 3.2 Enrollment Trends.......................................................................................3-6 3.3 Missouri Community College Taxing Districts and Designated Service Areas............................................................................3-9 3.4 Tuition Rates................................................................................................3-11 3.5 Program Inventory by Level........................................................................3-13 3.6 Conclusion....................................................................................................3-30 4.0 IDENTIFIED PROGRAM NEEDS.......................................................................4-1 4.1 Student Needs and Preferences..............................................................4-1 4.2 Employer Needs and Preferences...........................................................4-6 4.3 Summary of Findings.............................................................................4-20 5.0 GAPS AND BARRIERS......................................................................................5-1 5.1 Perceptions of Gaps and Barriers............................................................5-1 5.2 Cost of Attendance.................................................................................5-11 5.3 Key Underserved Segments..................................................................5-13 6.0 PROGRAM ACCESS OPTIONS........................................................................6-1 6.1 Description of Possible Local Options......................................................6-1 6.2 Option Preferences (By Student Group)..................................................6-3 6.3 Possible Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Option .....................6-10 7.0 NEEDS ASSESSMENT CONCLUSIONS..........................................................7-1 7.1 Key Observations.....................................................................................7-1 7.2 Estimates of Demand...............................................................................7-5 7.3 Suggestions for Delivery Option Review and Evaluation .......................7-13 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION For many years, local business and education leaders, community stakeholders, the Cape Girardeau Chamber of Commerce, and state officials have contemplated the need for additional postsecondary education in Cape Girardeau County. In particular, there has been spirited debate regarding potential need for additional opportunities for area residents to complete two-year associate's degrees locally. After several recent efforts to do so, and subsequent conflicts among current or potential providers, all interests have agreed to come together to gain a better understanding of current and future education needs. Through the formation of the Cape Girardeau Coalition Task Force, a voluntary group of local and regional business and education leaders, and with assistance from the Missouri Department of Higher Education and the state's Coordinating Board for Higher Education, an effort to identify needs and explore cooperative options for meeting those needs has begun. In mid -2008, the Cape Girardeau Chamber of Commerce, on behalf of the Coalition Task Force, requested a study of postsecondary education needs of the local region. This included Cape Girardeau County and several surrounding counties in Missouri and Illinois. MGT of America, Inc., a national higher education planning and research firm, was selected by the Coalition and retained by the Chamber on its behalf. This report and subsequent appendices (under separate cover) present the findings and conclusions of the area education needs assessment. 1.1 Background Southeastern Missouri has a variety of postsecondary education providers serving the region and the local Cape Girardeau market. Several main campuses of institutions are located within this broader geographic area of the State, others operate through their own off -campus centers, or share sites in order to reach local populations more cost effectively. Cape Girardeau County is home to Southeast Missouri State University, a graduate level, moderately selective, regional public residential institution. Southeast offers a significant array of undergraduate and graduate programs at its main campus and its River campus, both within the City of Cape Girardeau. It also offers selected courses and programs in nearby communities to the North and South at several off - campus locations. Also located within the county is the Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center (CTC) that provides technical and skills training for high school and postsecondary students alike. Southeast Missouri State does offer some lower division undergraduate courses at this facility, primarily for dual enrollment high school students and those freshmen who may fall just short of the University's admission requirements. Other postsecondary providers that are locally based include Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing and Health Sciences, and Metro Business College, both with specifically focused niche markets and targeted population segments. MGT of America, Inc. 1-1 Introduction 1.2 Key Issues For many years, there have been serious concerns among students, parents, educators, public officials, and policy makers across the country as to the adverse impacts resulting from the rapidly rising cost of a college education. Many more students are choosing less costly alternatives to a traditional four-year residential college experience. Over the last two years, the declining economy has magnified the steady increase in higher education participation via community colleges. More students must now work while attending college, and many cannot venture too far from home to pursue their educational goals. Similar issues and situations most certainly exist in the area surrounding Cape Girardeau as well. Currently, there is no traditional community college main campus located within Cape Girardeau County, although several are based within a 30 to 90 mile radius. These include the main campuses of Shawnee Community College across the river in Illinois, Mineral Area College (MAC) to the northwest in Park Hills, and Three Rivers Community College (TRCC) to the southwest in Poplar Bluff. The latter two colleges currently offer (or have in the past offered) courses and degree programs through off -campus centers and shared sites in Sikeston, Perryville, and at the Cape Girardeau CTC to serve this local market. Cape Girardeau County is not part of any community college taxing district, though it does fall within the designated service area of TRCC. At one point TRCC had offered courses at the CTC and planned to open an off -campus center within the county. However, those plans changed, and they no longer offer courses or programs at any Cape site. TRCC does provide face-to-face access to courses leading to certificates and two-year degrees at an off -campus center in Sikeston approximately 30 miles south. MAC continues to offer courses and several programs at the Cape Girardeau CTC, and at the Perryville Higher Education Center to the north. Southeast Missouri State offers general education undergraduate courses and programs at both of those sites plus their own Sikeston Center. Though Southeast Missouri State has been and continues to be a focal point where local area residents and the prevailing workforce can access both undergraduate and graduate level education and degree programs, as a regional university it draws enrollments from a much more extensive geographic area. In recent years a growing number of their enrollments originate from the greater St. Louis market. As the University's reach has expanded beyond southeast Missouri, selectivity of entering students has increased as well. It no longer provides an "open enrollment" option for all local prospective freshmen. Additionally, for those students who do not fully qualify under the University's current admissions requirements, there are limited local opportunities to begin their pursuit of a baccalaureate degree program. With no locally based community college, area high school graduates and non-traditional age adult students who for whatever reason cannot, or do not wish to attend Southeast Missouri State, must rely on the selected degree offerings and support services available through TRCC or MAC at nearby centers. Only a very limited number of local residents can commute to their more distant main campuses or across into Illinois to attend Shawnee Community College. All of the current options appear to have potential disadvantages for many Cape young and old residents and working adults. As a result, some community leaders are of the opinion that existing options do not fully meet local needs, and therefore, one or more population segments are unable to pursue their educational goals without considerable obstacles. They wish to establish either a new MGT of America, Inc. 1-2 Introduction local community college or a full-service branch of an existing one. They hope such an entity would do the following: ■ Provide more readily available access to two-year degree programs, especially those that would facilitate transfer into baccalaureate degree completion tracks; ■ Expand local access to those residents and working adults that are time- or place -bound; ■ Provide a more affordable option (a critical issue in today's unprecedented economic environment) as tuition and fees at the community college level are significantly less than those at four-year institutions across the state; ■ Offer a long-range permanent path to increasing local area educational attainment levels across all population segments and enhance the available skilled workforce; ■ Complement (along with other education providers) the regional economic development strategies to strengthen and expand the local economic base. However, others are less supportive of establishing a new institution or branch campus of an existing college for a variety of reasons. Costs to all parties involved (both start-up and recurring) must be closely examined before such option(s) could become a reality. The time it would take to complete that regulatory processes, navigate the planning requirements, and gain needed approvals (including voter approval) will be lengthy. There is state -level concern that in attempting to meet local needs, unnecessary duplication of programs and services may result. Specifically, Southeast Missouri State officials have expressed concern as to the adverse impact that might occur to their lower division enrollments originating from the area if a two-year college/branch/center were established locally. On the other hand, the University would be expected to support other alternatives that would not erode their current level of freshmen and lower division enrollments given their regional mission. Finally, the two community colleges that have a vested interest in the Cape Girardeau area would each prefer to have a greater role and scope in providing a more extensive range of programs and services locally, but are also obligated to consider the needs of their local taxing districts first and foremost. Clearly, the solution to this long-standing dilemma is complex, and will not be arrived at easily. 1.3 Study Objectives Given the historical and current circumstances of postsecondary education options available in Cape Girardeau County and the surrounding area, as well as the changing demographic and economic characteristics of the region, the study seeks to identify education needs of local residents and businesses. It also should discover or confirm existing access barriers and obstacles, and reveal gaps that are not now being addressed. Several key questions have been repeatedly asked by business and community leaders: ■ What are the current education needs of the region and how will those needs change in the future? MGT of America, Inc. 1-3 Introduction ■ Are there un -served or under -served local population segments? ■ What are the critical barriers or obstacles to education access? ■ Are there gaps between needs and current programming? ■ If there are gaps, at what level of postsecondary education are they most prevalent, and what options might best reduce such gaps? More pointedly these questions linger: ■ Should there be a more full-service community college presence in the County? ■ Should Cape Girardeau County have its own community college? The study has been formulated to collect and consolidate information and data that will lead to a reasonable set of answers and options regarding these issues. It is hoped that the study findings and conclusions will help the Coalition, other community leaders, and education officials develop a long-term course of action that will most benefit residents and businesses who have limited or no options or opportunities to pursue all levels of postsecondary education beyond the local area. 1.4 Report Outline This report details the findings of the Educational Needs Analysis of the Cape Girardeau Area as outlined below: 2.0 Market Conditions Affecting Demand for Postsecondary Education ■ Population Trends and Projections ■ High School Enrollments and Graduation Rates ■ Postsecondary Educational Attainment, Participation and Enrollment Trends ■ Economic Trends and Projections ■ Summary and Conclusions 3.0 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market ■ Brief Description of Each Local Provider ■ Enrollment trends ■ Missouri Community College Taxing Districts and ■ Designated Service Areas ■ Tuition Rates ■ Program Inventory by Level ■ Conclusion MGT of America, Inc. 1-4 Introduction 4.0 Identified Program Needs ■ Student Needs and Preferences ■ Employer Needs and Preferences ■ Summary of Findings 5.0 Gaps and Barriers ■ Perceptions of Gaps and Barriers ■ Cost of Attendance ■ Key Underserved Segments 6.0 Program Access Options ■ Description of Possible Local Options ■ Option Preferences (By Student Group) ■ Possible Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Option 7.0 Needs Assessment Conclusions ■ Key Observations ■ Estimates of Demand ■ Suggestions for Delivery Option Review and Evaluation APPENDICES High School Student Survey High School Survey Methodology and Results Postsecondary Student Survey Postsecondary Student Survey Methodology and Results List of Student Survey Participating Institutions Employer Survey Employer Survey Methodology and Results List of Participating Employers Comparison to Springfield, Missouri Experience Detailed Occupational Projections MGT of America, Inc. 1-5 2.0 MARKET CONDITIONS AFFECTING DEMAND FOR POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION 2.0 MARKET CONDITIONS AFFECTING DEMAND FOR POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION A variety of conditions can affect the demand for postsecondary education in a region, including population trends, anticipated growth or decline in both traditional and non- traditional college age groups, trends in educational participation and achievement, the status of local workforce as evidenced by unemployment rates, projected job openings by industry, and education/training required for successful local employment. This chapter describes the Cape Girardeau area with respect to each of these market conditions and summarizes the cumulative affect on demand for postsecondary education in the region. In addition to the data relating to Missouri and the four counties comprising the immediate Cape Girardeau area (Bollinger, Cape Girardeau, Scott, and Stoddard), data have been collected for four Illinois counties at the suggestion of the Cape Girardeau Coalition Task Force. The Illinois counties considered are Alexander, Johnson, Perry, and Union. 2.1 Population Trends and Proiections As the broadest measure of the market for educational services, analyses of area population trends and projections are essential to determine the baseline for potential program needs and demand. Variations in the overall scale, as well as the composition of local and nearby populations, will inevitably impact the demand for postsecondary educational services in a region. The populations in Cape Girardeau County and the surrounding region are steadily increasing, as noted in Exhibit 2-1. The percentage of 18 to 24 year-olds in Cape Girardeau County, which represents the traditional base of enrollments for local postsecondary providers, is the only category that experienced a greater percentage of change between 2000 and 2007 (5.7 percent growth) than between 1990 and 2000 (0.2 percent growth). The only decline in population is the 25 to 44 age range between 2000 and 2007 (-1.8 percent). The Cape Girardeau Region as a whole (including Cape Girardeau, Bollinger, Scott, and Stoddard counties) has experienced a slightly slower rate of growth than Cape Girardeau County individually. The total populations of neighboring counties in Illinois also grew at a relatively slower rate from 1990 to 2000 and contracted somewhat from 2000 to 2007. However, the youngest age group (18 to 24 years) in these Illinois counties grew by 13.4 percent over the 1990 through 2000 period. More recent estimates are, unfortunately, not available for this age group in these particular geographies. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-1 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education EXHIBIT 2-1 POPULATION DISTRIBUTIONS BY AGE GROUP, CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY, THE CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA, MISSOURI, AND ILLINOIS COUNTIES, 1990 THROUGH 2007 Area Date(s) 18 to 24 years 25 to 44 years 18+ years Total population 1990 9,181 18,389 47,004 61,663 Cape 2000 9,203 19,067 52,596 68,693 Girardeau 2007 9,726 18,732 55,908 72,047 County % Change: 1990-2000 0.2% ° 3.7/0 ° 11.9/0 ° 11.4/0 % Change: 2000-2007 5.7% -1.8% 6.3% 4.9% 1990 16,224 40,846 104,702 140,523 Cape 2000 16,090 41,229 113,423 150,849 Girardeau Region 2007 n/a n/a n/a 155,331 % Change: 1990-2000 -0.8% 0.9% 8.3% 7.3% (MO only) % Change: 2000-2007 --- --- --- 3.0% 1990 517,191 1,586,813 3,802,247 5,117,073 2000 535,978 1,626,302 4,167,519 5,595,211 Missouri 2007 565,960 1,569,519 4,410,991 5,834,644 % Change: 1990-2000 3.6% 2.5% 9.6% 9.3% % Change: 2000-2007 5.6% -3.5% 5.8% 4.3% 1990 5,259 17,686 45,956 61,004 2000 5,965 19,202 49,696 63,855 Illinois Counties 2007 n/a n/a n/a 62,376 % Change: 1990-2000 13.4% 8.6% 8.1%1 4.7% % Change: 2000-2007 --- --- --- -2.3% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Census 1990 and 2000, American Community Survey 2007. n/a: Data not available for particular segment/geography. Note: The Cape Girardeau Region includes Cape Girardeau, Bollinger, Scott, and Stoddard Counties. The Illinois Counties include Union, Johnson, Perry, and Alexander. Regarding prospective growth for the area, the Missouri Census Data Center generates population estimates and short-term projections by school district. These estimates (for 2005) and projections (through 2010) for relevant school districts in the Cape Girardeau areal are depicted in Exhibit 2-2. The area as a whole is not projected to grow by substantial amounts over this five-year period, with a projected increase of about 2,200 residents (2 percent). Districts in Cape Girardeau and Bollinger counties are expected to grow at slightly faster rates than what is observed for the selected districts in northern Scott and Stoddard counties. School districts encompassed in this analysis represent all districts in Cape Girardeau and Bollinger counties as well as in the northern regions of Scott and Stoddard counties that border or overlap with Cape Girardeau County. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-2 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education EXHIBIT 2-2 POPULATION ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS BY SCHOOL DISTRICT, CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA, 2005 County District 2005 Est 2010 Proj Change Percent Bollinger Advance R -iv 304 307 3 1.0% Delta R -v 93 92 (1) -1.1% Jackson R -ii 29 29 0 0.0% Leopold R -iii 872 867 (5) -0.6% Woodland R -iv 5,998 6,048 50 0.8% Oak Ridge R -vi 10 11 1 10.0% Meadow Heights R -ii 3,418 3,673 255 7.5% Perry CO. 32 6 6 0 0.0% Zalma R -v 1,636 1,665 29 1.8% TOTAL 12,366 12,698 332 2.7% Cape Girardeau Advance R -iv 130 141 11 8.5% Cape Girardeau 63 35,354 36,641 1,287 3.6% Nell Holcomb R -iv 2,742 2,793 51 1.9% Delta R -v 2,159 2,271 112 5.2% Jackson R -ii 27,892 28,193 301 1.1% Oak Ridge R -vi 2,117 2,247 130 6.1% TOTAL 70,394 72,286 1,892 2.7% Scott Scott CO. R -iv 6,223 6,096 (127) -2.0% Scott City R -i 5,139 5,356 217 4.2% Kelso C-7 2,370 2,394 24 1.0% Oran R -iii 2,469 2,405 (64) -2.6% TOTAL 16,201 16,251 50 0.3% Stoddard Advance R -iv 2,515 2,439 (76) -3.0% Bell City R -ii 1,612 1,599 (13) -0.8% TOTAL 4,127 4,038 (89) -2.2% REGION TOTAL 103,088 1 105,273 1 2,185 1 2.1% Source: Missouri Census Data Center. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-3 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education The Missouri Census Data Center also generates population estimates for counties by age group. As depicted in Exhibit 2-3, the total populations for the state as well as each of the regional counties, besides Stoddard, are expected to grow between 2005 and 2020. However, dividing these data by age reveals some variance in terms of the compositions of the population. The demographic of residents aged 15 to 19 years old is projected to decline from 2005 through 2010 as well as between 2010 and 2015, before recovering somewhat between 2015 and 2020, yielding net decreases in populations for this younger age group between 2005 and 2020. Alternately, substantial increases are observed in the population segment of residents aged 45 to 64 years across most geographies, while Cape Girardeau County, specifically, is projected to see large growth in the 25 to 44 year-old demographic by 2020 (11.9 percent, cumulatively). This may impact educational needs in the area due to differing desires of various age demographics, as declines in traditional aged college students are observed simultaneous with expansions in some older demographics. EXHIBIT 2-3 POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY AGE FOR SELECTED AREAS IN MISSOURI, THROUGH 2010 AND 2020 Source: Missouri Census Data Center. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-4 Projected Growth Rates: Estimate Total, Age Group Area 2005 2005-2010 2010-2015 2015-2020 2005-2020 TOTAL, Cape Girardeau 71,153 4.2% 3.9% 3.8% 12.3% All Ages Bollinger 12,185 0.6% 1.2% 1.2% 3.0% Scott_ 40,622 0.1 % 0.4% 0.4% 0.8% Stoddard 29,737 -0.5% -U.s /0 -0.4% -1.2% Missouri 5,781,293 3.4% 3.4% 3.3% 10.5% 15-19 Cape Girardeau 6,005 -3.1% -5.7% 3.4% -5.5% Bollinger 960 -9.7% -11.9% 4.7% -16.7% Scott 3,065 -3.9% -9.3% 1.6% -11.4% Stoddard 2,135 -6.3% -7.2% 4.1% -9.5% Missouri 427,130 -2.1% -4.8% 3.0% -4.0% 20-24 Cape Girardeau 7,298 4.8% -2.6% -4.5% -2.5% Bollinger 761 7.9% -9.6% -11.9% -14.1% Scott 2,589 4.1% -3.9% -9.3% -9.2% Stoddard 1,969 -6.2% -6.4% -7.3% -18.7% Missouri 431,154 3.2% -2.1% -4.6% -3.6% 25-44 Cape Girardeau 17,892 0.9% 6.6% 4.1% 11.9% Bollinger 3,018 -4.8% 2.0% 0.9% -2.0% Scott 10,395 -5.7% -0.2% 0.0% -5.9% Stoddard 7,302 -5.0% -1.1% -1.2% -7.1% Missouri 1,552,244 -0.9% 4.3% 3.7% 7.1% 45-64 Cape Girardeau 17,159 10.5% 1.9% -2.07/. 10.4% Bollinger 3,256 8.6% 0.2% -2.8% 5.7% Scott 10,113 5.5% -2.5% -4.0% -1.3% Stoddard 7,545 4.6% -3.1% -4.5% -3.2% Missouri 1,434,708 10.3% 1.5% -1.2% 10.6% Source: Missouri Census Data Center. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-4 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education 2.2 Hia►h School Enrollments and Graduation Rates This section presents information on the numbers and rates of high school graduates in relevant geographies. As the primary feeders of traditional -aged enrollments at local postsecondary institutions, trends observed among these populations can significantly impact the demand for postsecondary training and education services. High school enrollments in the Cape Girardeau Region declined marginally between 2004 and 2008 (Exhibit 2-4). This is consistent with the population projections depicted previously and may continue through 2015. 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 EXHIBIT 2-4 MISSOURI HIGH SCHOOL ENROLLMENT BY COUNTY, CAPE GIRARDEAU REGION, 2004 THROUGH 2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source: Missouri Department of Education, 2008-2009. 5,447 2008 ■ Bollinger County ■ Cape Girardeau Scott County ■ Stoddard County MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-5 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education Graduation rates for the area and state as a whole, as depicted in Exhibit 2-5, have varied widely over the last five years. Generally, the local counties exceed the statewide graduation rates (with Scott County yielding the highest proportions of graduates in the area), except Bollinger County, which lagged below the other counties as well as the statewide average in 2005 and 2006. 92.0% 90.0 88.0% 86.0% 84.0% 82.0% 80.0% 78.0% 76.0% EXHIBIT 2-5 MISSOURI HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATES BY COUNTY, CAPE GIRARDEAU REGION, 2003 THROUGH 2007 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source: Missouri Department of Education, 2008-2009. ■ Bollinger ■ Cape Girardeau Scott ■ Stoddard ■ Missouri Consistent with the trends observed previously, the total numbers of high school graduates in the area have declined slightly in recent years (Exhibit 2-6). Again, this trend is consistent with population projections by age depicted previously and may continue through 2015, before increases in this age demographic are observed. However, any simultaneous increases in graduation rates at area high schools over this period might offset the declines in the base numbers of secondary school -aged residents. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-6 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education EXHIBIT 2-6 NUMBER OF MISSOURI HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES BY COUNTY, CAPE GIRARDEAU REGION, 2003 THROUGH 2007 700 600 Oro 500 400 000 300 Opo 200 100 0 ■ Bollinger • Cape Girardeau Scott • Stoddard 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source: Missouri Department of Education, 2008-2009. As depicted in Exhibit 2-7, high school graduation rates in nearby Illinois counties have varied more dramatically than what was observed in the Missouri counties highlighted previously. 100% 80i 60% 40% 20% 0% EXHIBIT 2-7 ILLINOIS HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATES BY COUNTY, CAPE GIRARDEAU REGION, 2003 THROUGH 2007 2003 2004 2005 Alexander Johnson Source: Illinois State Board of Education, 2003-2007. 2006 2007 Perry ■ Union MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-7 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education The numbers of high school graduates in neighboring counties in Illinois have shown some volatility over the 2003 through 2007 period, but, overall, have remained fairly static (Exhibit 2-8). Total graduates in these counties amounted to 612 students in 2007, as compared to 619 in 2003. 250 200 150 100 50 EXHIBIT 2-8 NUMBER OF HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES BY COUNTY, SELECT ILLINOIS COUNTIES, 2003 THROUGH 2007 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 ■ Alexander ■Johnson Perry ■ Union Source: Illinois State Board of Education, 2003-2007. Consequently, though the total number of high school graduates from the combined Missouri/Illinois market approaches 2,200 students, the nearby Illinois counties may provide only a small enrollment potential for expanded higher education opportunities in Cape Girardeau, as they represent less than one-third of the total count. 2.3 Postsecondary Educational Attainment, Participation, and Enrollment Trends This section presents an assortment of data regarding the current impact and operation of postsecondary education in the Cape Girardeau area. Included are reviews of educational attainment, participation, and enrollment levels gathered for this region compared to statewide and other averages to provide context. One of the more direct measures of need for access to additional postsecondary educational programs in the Cape Girardeau area entails an examination of educational attainment rates in the area compared to other benchmarks. As depicted in Exhibit 2-9, attainment rates in Cape Girardeau County increased between 1990 and 2007. However, by far the most substantial contributor to this increase in college-educated individuals is the segment that attained bachelor's degrees or higher (increased from 17 percent in 1990 to 22 percent in 2007). Alternately, associate degree (combined with some college, no degree) attainment has been static (varying between 28 percent and 29 percent) over the same period. Though 2007 data are not available, trends in postsecondary degree attainment in the broader Cape Girardeau Region appear to be MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-8 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education less positive for 1990 through 2000 period, with both measures declining over this period (associate degree or some college dropping from 26 percent to 24 percent and bachelor's degree attainment dropping from 15 percent to 14 percent). EXHIBIT 2-9 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT, CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY AND THE CAPE GIRARDEAU REGION, 1990 THROUGH 2007 Source: U.S. Census Bureau. The attainment rates observed in the previous exhibit generally exceed statewide averages for Missouri. However, this is an expected result given the footprint and impact of the presence of one of Missouri's larger postsecondary institutions in Cape Girardeau. Comparisons between counties hosting similar regional universities are more valid in this sense because they help control for the added proportions of generally more -educated individuals associated with the operation of such institutions. Greene County, Missouri is the home county of Missouri State University, which enrolls a larger number of students than Southeast Missouri State University within the relatively larger population base of Springfield.2 While the comparison is not ideal, analogies between these two areas have some merit given the geographic proximity and common operating environment shared by the two areas (discussed in further detail in Appendix 1). There is a gap in the proportions of individuals aged 25 years and older that have attained college degree in Cape Girardeau and Greene Counties; Exhibit 2-10 illuminates that gap as a shortfall in Cape Girardeau County when compared to Greene County. The shortfall is most pronounced at the associate degree level, where nearly twice as large a proportion of the Greene County population has attained an associate degree (5.6 percent) when compared to Cape Girardeau County (3.0 percent). A slight shortfall is also observed in the proportions of individuals who have attained bachelor's degrees or higher (about 19 percent in Greene County versus 16 percent in Cape Girardeau County). 2 As of 2007, Missouri State University enrolled about 21,000 students in relation to Greene County's total population of about 260,000. This compares to about 11,000 students at Southeast Missouri State University in relation to the Cape Girardeau County population of about 73,000. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-9 Educational Attainment Rates by Year % of 18+ % of 18+ % of 18+ 1990 2000 2007 Area/Segment 1990 Population 2000 Population 2007* Population Cape Girardeau County Population 18 years and over 46,941 100.00% 52,522 100.00% 55,910 100.00% Less than high school graduate 10,779 22.96% 9,625 18.33% 7,412 13.26% High school graduate (incl. equivalency) 14,746 31.41% 16,659 31.72% 20,200 36.13% Some college or associate degree 13,533 28.83% 15,184 28.91% 15,919 28.47% Bachelor's degree or higher 7,883 16.79% 11,054 21.05% 12,379 22.14% Cape Girardeau Region (MO only) Population 18 years and over 53,773 100.00% 110,525 100.00% Less than high school graduate 14,429 26.28% 27,804 24.52% High school graduate (incl. equivalency) 17,635 32.12% 42,028 37.07% Some college or associate degree 14,458 26.33% 26,956 23.78% Bachelor's degree or higher 8,383 15.27% 16,583 14.63% Source: U.S. Census Bureau. The attainment rates observed in the previous exhibit generally exceed statewide averages for Missouri. However, this is an expected result given the footprint and impact of the presence of one of Missouri's larger postsecondary institutions in Cape Girardeau. Comparisons between counties hosting similar regional universities are more valid in this sense because they help control for the added proportions of generally more -educated individuals associated with the operation of such institutions. Greene County, Missouri is the home county of Missouri State University, which enrolls a larger number of students than Southeast Missouri State University within the relatively larger population base of Springfield.2 While the comparison is not ideal, analogies between these two areas have some merit given the geographic proximity and common operating environment shared by the two areas (discussed in further detail in Appendix 1). There is a gap in the proportions of individuals aged 25 years and older that have attained college degree in Cape Girardeau and Greene Counties; Exhibit 2-10 illuminates that gap as a shortfall in Cape Girardeau County when compared to Greene County. The shortfall is most pronounced at the associate degree level, where nearly twice as large a proportion of the Greene County population has attained an associate degree (5.6 percent) when compared to Cape Girardeau County (3.0 percent). A slight shortfall is also observed in the proportions of individuals who have attained bachelor's degrees or higher (about 19 percent in Greene County versus 16 percent in Cape Girardeau County). 2 As of 2007, Missouri State University enrolled about 21,000 students in relation to Greene County's total population of about 260,000. This compares to about 11,000 students at Southeast Missouri State University in relation to the Cape Girardeau County population of about 73,000. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-9 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education EXHIBIT 2-10 ESTIMATED EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT OF THE POPULATION AGED 25 YEARS AND OVER IN CAPE GIRARDEAU AND GREENE COUNTIES, 2007 35.0% 30.0% O c 25.0% R N 20.0% a to 15.0% 0 Q. 10.0% 0 a 5.0%- 0.0% Missouri (Statewide) Cape Greene Girardeau County County Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 American Community Survey. Graduate or professional degree ■ Bachelor's degree ■ Associate degree Applying the shortfall in college degree attainment rates observed previously in Exhibit 2-10 to the population of Cape Girardeau County highlights a substantial shortfall of individuals. In order to reach the attainment levels of Greene County, Cape Girardeau County would need slightly more than 1,200 individuals to obtain associate degrees as well as another 1,200 individuals to obtain bachelor's degrees or higher. In total, 2,400 more individuals would need to obtain associate degrees or higher to reach similar proportions. In terms of the current enrollment levels, the numbers of students at many of the Cape Girardeau area institutions have increased over the last eight years. As depicted in Exhibit 2-11, enrollments at Southeast Missouri State University, Mineral Area College, and Three Rivers Community College increased substantially (double-digit growth) between 2000 and 2007. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-10 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education EXHIBIT 2-11 TRENDS IN TOTAL HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT AT CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA INSTITUTIONS, 2000 THROUGH 2007 ■ Southeast Missouri State University ■ Mineral Area College ■ Three Rivers Community College 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source: Missouri Department of Higher Education, 2000 — 2007. As a subcomponent of the figures depicted in Exhibit 2-11, the numbers of full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollments at these major providers are depicted in Exhibit 2-12. This subset of students also increased at a substantial rate between 2000 and 2007. EXHIBIT 2-12 TRENDS IN FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) ENROLLMENT AT CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA INSTITUTIONS, 2000 THROUGH 2007 Source: Missouri Department of Higher Education, 2000 — 2007. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-11 9,000 ■ Southeast Missouri State University ■MineralAreaCollege ■ Three Rivers Community College 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 L L 6 6 1,000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source: Missouri Department of Higher Education, 2000 — 2007. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-11 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education 2.4 Economic Trends and Proiections This section includes a review of existing data regarding the economic conditions and outlook for the Cape Girardeau area. Particular attention is given the areas of growth in occupational and industrial sectors as they relate to potential need for training and education programs at the postsecondary level. Analyses are presented for: ■ The "Cape Girardeau Region," which encompasses Cape Girardeau County as well as the counties of Bollinger, Scott, and Stoddard. ■ The Southeast Missouri Workforce Investment Area (WIA), which covers a total of 13 counties in the proximity of Cape Girardeau, extending south and east to the state border, west just short of Poplar Bluff, and north to the outskirts of the St. Louis metro area.3 As depicted in Exhibit 2-13, Cape Girardeau County represents about 30 percent of the Southeast Missouri WIA, while the Cape Girardeau Region encompasses about 49 percent of this WIA. Accordingly, data for the Southeast Missouri WIA can be prorated by approximately one-half to reflect the more immediate region that is the focus of this study. 3 Southeast Missouri Workforce Investment Area includes Bollinger, Dunklin, Cape Girardeau, Iron, Madison, Mississippi, New Madrid, Pemiscot, Perry, Scott, St. Francois, Ste. Genevieve and Stoddard counties. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-12 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education EXHIBIT 2-13 TOTAL EMPLOYMENT ESTIMATES FOR CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY, THE CAPE GIRARDEAU REGION, AND THE SOUTHEAST MISSOURI WIA, 2007 SOUTHEAST MISSOURI WIA EMPLOYMENT "Cape Girardeau Area" 68,742 48.6% ----------------------- Scott Bollinger 14,186 Cape Girardeau 41,957 29.7% 1,813 10.0% Stoddard 10,786 7.6% Source: Missouri Economic Research and Information Center (MERIC). 2.4.1 Personal Income her Counties 72,647 51.4% Educational attainment rates are a strong driver of personal income. Statistics published by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (Exhibit 2-14) indicate that the average per capita personal income in the Cape Girardeau area is lower than the state average. The median household income in 2006 was almost 11 percent lower in Cape Girardeau County than in the state of Missouri, while other area counties fell significantly below this mark. However, overall personal income grew at a faster rate in each of the selected Missouri counties than the statewide average between 1996 and 2006. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-13 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education EXHIBIT 2-14 PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME AND MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY COUNTY, CAPE GIRARDEAU REGION, 1999 AND 2004 Area 2006 Per Capita Personal Income Average Annual Growth Rate in Personal Income, 1996-2006 Cape Girardeau County $29,649 7.5% Bollinger County $21,709 7.9% Scott County $27,192 7.1% Stoddard County $24,949 7.2% Missouri (Statewide) $32,789 6.8% Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Account, Local Area Personal Income, table CA1-3 — Personal income summary. 2.4.2 Employment and Unemployment Trends An examination of local employment trends shows that the market has remained fairly level over the last five years. Exhibit 2-15 presents the trends in employment levels in each of the four area counties, by month, from 2004 through 2008. Cape Girardeau is home to the largest segment of this area workforce (with about 38,900 employed, per the most recent estimates), followed by Scott (18,300), Stoddard (14,000), and Bollinger Counties (5,800). MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-14 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education EXHIBIT 2-15 TREND IN TOTAL EMPLOYMENT LEVELS, CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA, JANUARY 2004 THROUGH DECEMBER 2008 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 O� O� Off` Off` OHO OrO OHO OHO 01 01 0103A 04i C3% O4' O4' ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,10 .10 ,10 ,10 ,10 ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,10 ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,10 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. ■ Bollinger ■ Stoddard ■ Scott ■ Cape Girardeau The peak size of the workforce for the area over this time period occurred in June 2007, when 80,273 were employed across all four counties. The December 2008 estimates indicated the employed population was about 3,000 below this peak, at 77,024. Since employment levels have remained stagnant while the population (and, therefore, overall workforce) have grown, the unemployment rate has grown at a fairly rapid pace. As depicted in Exhibit 2-16, December 2008 unemployment rates for the four -county area increased substantially from the 4.1 percent low, observed in April 2006, to a five- year high of 6.8 percent. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-15 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education EXHIBIT 2-16 TREND IN UNEMPLOYMENT RATES, CAPE GIRARDEAU REGION, JANUARY 2004 THROUGH DECEMBER 2008 V -�Y V V 't V to to Ln Ln M Ln t0 W t0 t0 t0 tD I, I` n n n n W W W W co W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (D O O N N N N N N N N N t fa N N N N N N N N N N Ni N N N N N N N N N N C > -O-> C O > C i >- Q -i C >? -O.i C O_i EM v O 9 - v O 9EM W O EM v O - v O 2 V) Z N Z 2 Ln Z 2 N Z N Z Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. 2.4.3 Employment Proiections by Industry and Occupation The most recent official employment projections published by the Missouri Economic Research and Information Center (MERIC) rely on somewhat outdated workforce data (a base of 2004), and therefore do not reflect the more recent softening that has occurred throughout the national economy. Nonetheless, these data are presented with the expectation that they can still depict some historic elements of strengths across the local economies. The data published in this section refer to employment levels or job openings for the Southeast Missouri Workforce Investment Area. Prorating these values to the more immediate Cape Girardeau Region loosely entails reducing any depicted figures by one-half of their value, per the distributions of employment depicted in Exhibit 2-13. Exhibit 2-17 depicts projections of total employment in 2014 versus the base figure for 2004. The net growth in jobs for the 13 -county area was forecasted to total just over 12,000 for this period, or about 1,200 additional jobs per year, which translates to about 6,000 jobs in the Cape Girardeau Region. Again, it should be noted that actual circumstances may vary widely from this prediction due to changes in the economic climate since the development of these projections. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-16 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education EXHIBIT 2-17 PROJECTED GROWTH IN SOUTHEAST MISSOURI WIA, 2004 THROUGH 2014 180,000 166,320 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 - 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 154,300 12,026 ■ Estimated Projected ■ Change Source: Missouri Economic Research and Information Center (MERIC), 2004 through 2014 employment projections by industry. Potentially more useful to this study are comparisons between various components of growth in the local economy, as the foundations for these areas of relative strength may still be in place. To this end, we have examined industrial and occupational projection data for this same period to isolate any such areas of expected needs for training and education in the labor market. Industry projection data reveal some of the stronger sectors of the economy, at least prior to the more recent downturn. Comparing this information with the results of the custom employer survey (presented in Chapter 4.0) will help to clarify which of the suggested growth areas may still exhibit signs of strength. The top 10 areas of growth in the economy forecasted for the 2004 through 2014 period included: ■ Ambulatory health care services — 2,417 total net growth in employment (which prorates to approximately 1,200 jobs in the Cape Girardeau Region) ■ Administrative and support services — 1,816 total (900 Cape) ■ Social assistance — 1,593 total (790 Cape) ■ Nursing and residential care facilities — 1,186 total (590 Cape) ■ Hospital employment — 1,026 total (500 Cape) ■ Food services and drinking places — 745 total (360 Cape) MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-17 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education ■ General merchandise stores — 690 total (340 Cape) ■ Educational services — 579 total (280 Cape) ■ Local government, excluding education and hospitals — 447 total (220 Cape) ■ Merchant wholesalers, durable goods — 367 total (180 Cape) A separate set of employment projections published by MERIC are divided by occupation, and include associated training and education codes that assess the general requirements affiliated with each sector. Pursuant to the interests of this study, we have divided some data according to these codes in order to assess various needs of businesses in the area. Furthermore, these data are published in terms of openings, as opposed to net growth, which is more relevant to training and education needs, due to the circumstance that, even if the net growth of a job is slow or stagnant, significant retirement or other components of turnover may still lead to substantial vacancies (and therefore training needs) within a given occupational sector. Exhibit 2-18 depicts a comparison of total openings over the 2004 through 2014 period partitioned by training or education requirements (excluding occupational sectors requiring no postsecondary educational training). Occupational sectors requiring associate -level or postsecondary vocational training exhibit the largest number of average annual openings (5,718) over this ten year period, closely followed by bachelor's degree -level training needs (5,412), and, finally, a smaller proportion of openings requiring graduate- or professional -level training (1,427). As previously stated, approximately half of these openings might be observed in the more immediate four - county Cape Girardeau Region. EXHIBIT 2-18 PROJECTED TOTAL OPENINGS BY EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUIREMENT, 2004 THROUGH 2014 Bachelor's degree or bachelor's degree plus work experience 5,412 43% Graduate or professional degree 1,427 Associate degree or postsecondary vocational training 5,718 46% Source: Missouri Economic Research and Information Center (MERIC), 2004 through 2014 employment projections by occupation. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-18 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education Further examination of occupational data reveals the largest numbers of openings by specific occupational sector that are forecasted to be apparent in the local economy. As might be expected, many of these occupational areas reflect the projected growth by industry observed previously. Divided by associated educational or training requirements, some of the jobs exhibiting the largest number of openings over the 2004 through 2010 period include: Total 2004-2014 openings for jobs requiring associate degree or postsecondary vocational trainin_g: ■ Registered nurses — 1,383 openings (or approximately 680 in the Cape Girardeau Region) ■ Nursing aides, orderlies, and attendants — 1,132 openings (560 Cape) ■ Licensed practical and licensed vocations nurses — 438 openings (210 Cape) ■ Automotive service technicians and mechanics — 377 openings (180 Cape) ■ Preschool teachers (excluding special ed.) — 261 openings (130 Cape) ■ Medical secretaries — 160 openings (80 Cape) ■ Hairdressers, hairstylists, and cosmetologists — 159 openings (80 Cape) ■ Bus and truck mechanics and diesel engine specialists — 159 openings (80 Cape) ■ Emergency medical technicians and paramedics — 146 openings (70 Cape) ■ Medical records and health information technicians — 115 openings (50 Cape) Total 2004-2014 openings for jobs requiring bachelor's degree trainin_g or bachelor's degree plus work experience: ■ Secondary school teachers (excluding special ed. and vocational) — 486 openings (240 Cape) ■ General and operations managers — 448 openings (220 Cape) ■ Elementary school teachers (excluding special ed. and vocational) — 427 openings (210 Cape) ■ Accountants and auditors — 284 openings (140 Cape) ■ Insurance sales agents — 286 openings (140 Cape) ■ Child, family, and school social workers — 189 openings (90 Cape) ■ Chief executives — 173 openings (80 Cape) ■ Employment, recruitment, and Placement specialists — 143 (70 Cape) MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-19 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education ■ Middle school teachers (excluding special ed. and vocational) — 124 openings (60 Cape) ■ Special education teachers, secondary school — 102 openings (50 Cape) Total 2004-2014 openings for jobs requiring _-ggraduate degree or professional trainin_q: ■ Clergy — 132 openings (60 Cape) ■ Educational, vocational, and school counselors — 77 openings (40 Cape) ■ Lawyers — 65 openings (30 Cape) ■ Family and general practitioners — 60 openings (30 Cape) ■ Rehabilitation counselors — 60 openings (30 Cape) ■ Mental health and substance abuse social workers — 58 openings (20 Cape) ■ Dentists — 57 openings (20 Cape) ■ Pharmacists — 56 openings (20 Cape) ■ Anesthesiologists — 51 openings (20 Cape) ■ Education teachers, postsecondary — 46 openings (20 Cape) A full list of occupational sectors and associated openings by training or education level is included in Appendix J of this report. 2.5 Summary and Conclusions The data presented in this chapter depicted current circumstances as well as expectations regarding the population of Cape Girardeau and surrounding counties. Some of the more pertinent observations include: ■ The population of the four -county area referred to as the Cape Girardeau Region consists of about 150,000 individuals, about half of which reside in Cape Girardeau County. ■ Only modest amounts of growth are expected for the encompassed populations, with most of the growth occurring in demographic segments aged beyond 25 years. ■ Accordingly, the numbers of local high school enrollments and graduates have declined in recent years. ■ Since 1990, the only strong increases observed in college degree attainment occurred at the bachelor's degree level, and was confined geographically to MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-20 Market Conditions Affecting Demand For Postsecondary Education Cape Girardeau County, while outlying areas show little or no growth at any degree level. ■ Bachelor's degree attainment is competitive with statewide rates, but associate degree attainment lags significantly behind. ■ Total enrollment levels at Southeast Missouri State University, Three Rivers Community College, and Mineral Area College have increased steadily over the last five years. ■ Per capita personal income levels for the area fall short of statewide levels. ■ The most recent projections of employment growth for the area predicted growth for various industrial sectors in the region. However, more current data suggest spiking unemployment rates, consistent with the national economic downturn. ■ Prior to the downturn, the greatest areas of strength relative to local job markets were in health- and education -related industries and occupations. In the successive chapters, we examine the current providers of postsecondary educational services to this region, detail some additional assessments regarding needs and demand stemming from various survey efforts, and outline possible alternatives for meeting the unmet training and education needs of this region. MGT of America, Inc. Page 2-21 3.0 CURRENT SUPPLY OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION TO THE LOCAL MARKET 3.0 CURRENT SUPPLY OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION TO THE LOCAL MARKET The Cape Girardeau region is served by a variety of higher education providers. Some are locally based, while others operate off -campus centers in nearby communities. Students may choose to attend school part-time, full-time, or through distance education and are offered the opportunities to earn certificates, associate's, bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees. This chapter describes the current supply of postsecondary education available to the Cape Girardeau community. Though we did not examine Southern Illinois University — Carbondale, we are aware that it is a comprehensive research institution with more than 20,000 students, including more than 300 Missouri residents as of Fall 2008. 3.1 Brief Description of Each Local Provider What follows is a description of each of the seven primary providers of higher education in the Cape Girardeau area highlighted on the map in Exhibit 3-1: ■ Southeast Missouri State University ■ Mineral Area College ■ Three Rivers Community College ■ Shawnee Community College ■ Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center ■ Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing and Health Sciences ■ Metro Business College MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-1 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-1 CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION PROVIDERS ,h -nev;eve O r� `.. 5LPerr -Area' St ' Education er Mi I Area College p F � n� I I I x Jackson g ti Y Y ry County Catbc+ elate W. 'irad rarrco c: 1 ` S 0 r ;�k4Rd: _ So ast MIS uri Hospital College of rsin a fh Sciep�ces `:•. dlrar€rrr Go.unty I,1. \ Southeast Missou i V �ard�r�°e�a� y ca ar Try. State Universit _ Metro ess olringer arraty -- °�""n,�,de �rrciea 1 - - C e Girardea a i Coarnty Sha nee CC chno og ent j_r Sc my r S theast Miss o ri State ?_ _"r sit at S estop -' d Stod rd C�. Three Cc Stodd, d MverS CC Plar - - —CC at ik ton L C !� i •°1c'Y 1r d Hick CC? ,u Southeast Missouri State University - http://www.semo.edu/ ■ Mission: Southeast Missouri State University provides professional education grounded in the liberal arts and sciences and in practical experience. ■ Main campus is in Cape Girardeau; regional campuses in Kennett, Malden, Perryville (Perryville Area Higher Education Center), and Sikeston; sites at Harris -Stowe State College in St. Louis, Mineral Area College in Park Hills, St. Louis Community College in Florissant Valley — St. Louis, and Poplar Bluff. In addition, courses are offered at the Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center. ■ Established in 1873 as Third District Normal School; became Southeast Missouri State Teachers' College in 1919; renamed Southeast Missouri State College in 1946; and became Southeast Missouri State University in 1972. ■ More than 200 areas of study. ■ Fall 2006 total enrollment was 10,454. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-2 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market Mineral Area College - http://www.mineralarea.edu/ ■ Mission: The mission of Mineral Area College is to serve the community, to provide students a quality, affordable education, and to offer opportunities for professional and personal development. ■ Main campus is in Park Hills; outreach centers in Arcadia Valley, Farmington, Fredericktown, Perryville (Perry County Higher Education Center), Potosi, and Winona. In addition, courses are offered at the Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center. ■ District includes St. Francois county, and parts of Jefferson, Madison, Perry, Ste. Genevieve, and Washington counties. ■ Founded in 1965; successor of Flat River College, which was established in 1922. ■ Comprehensive community college. ■ 35 career and technical education programs as well as general education academic programs. ■ Mineral Area College administers the Missouri Customized Training Program for the region. Twelve training grants were submitted and funded this fiscal year for the Cape Girardeau area. ■ Mineral Area College is the facilitator and fiscal agent for the SEMO Regional Industrial Training Group. MAC also administers the Community College New Jobs and Job Retention programs for the Cape Girardeau area and works with the Cape Girardeau MAGNET (economic development association) when new prospects, expansions and retention projects are identified. The College also provides interpersonal/leadership skills training for the area. ■ Fall 2006 total enrollment was 2,926. Three Rivers Community College - http://www.trcc.edu/ ■ Mission: Three Rivers Community College provides quality, accessible and affordable learning opportunities and services for academic scholarship and professional success. ■ Main campus is in Poplar Bluff; centers in Campbell, Doniphan, Kennett, Malden, Piedmont, Portageville, Sikeston, and Van Buren. ■ District includes Butler, Carter, Ripley, and Wayne counties. ■ Cape Girardeau County is within its designated service area. ■ Founded in 1967. ■ 40 degree and certificate programs. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-3 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market ■ Fall 2006 total enrollment was 2,996. Shawnee Community College - http://www.shawneecc.edu/ ■ Mission: Shawnee Community College's mission is to serve the needs of the students and our diverse community by providing quality higher education, community education, training, and services that are accessible, affordable, and promote life-long learning. ■ Main campus is in Ullin, Illinois; centers located in Anna, Cairo, East St. Louis (at the East St. Louis Higher Education Center), and Metropolis (at the Metropolis Regional Education and Training Center). ■ District includes Alexander, Massac, Pulaski, and Union counties, and parts of Johnson and Jackson counties. ■ Organized in 1967. ■ Approximately 100 academic programs, including associate's degrees and certificates. ■ Fall 2006 total enrollment was 2,056. Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center - http://www. cape.k12.mo.us/cc/ ■ Purpose: The Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center is committed to community education. We offer you the chance to learn new skills, explore new career options, and fulfill your life by enrolling in our adult education programs. ■ Part of the Cape Girardeau Public School System http://www.capetigers.com/; under jurisdiction of Cape Girardeau Board of Education. ■ Mission of Cape Girardeau Schools: The mission of the Cape Girardeau School District, in collaboration with students, parents, and community, is to develop productive citizen of strong character with the skills and attitudes to compete in a changing, global society. ■ Programs for adult learners and high school students. ■ Offers trade and technical, college -level, career prep, personal enrichment, and adult education and literacy (GED) courses. ■ Fall 2006 total postsecondary enrollment was 130 (the adult student handbook states that CTC has 600-650 students per year). Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing and Health Sciences - http://www.southeastmissourihospitalcollege.edu/ ■ Mission: Responding to the health care educational needs of the region by preparing qualified health care professionals. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-4 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market ■ Main campus is in Cape Girardeau; additional site for nursing program in Kennett, in collaboration with Southeast Missouri State University. ■ Private, not-for-profit; Southeast Missouri Hospital is parent organization (269 beds). ■ Opened in 1928 as Southeast Missouri Hospital School of Nursing; closed during the Depression; reopened in 1990; received accreditation as diploma program in 1992; became College of Nursing in 1995; assumed current name in 2000. ■ Collaborates with other facilities in addition to the Southeast Missouri Hospital. ■ Programs - Associate degree in nursing (three tracks: traditional, LPN to RN, and evening/night program) - Surgical technology - Medical technology/clinical laboratory science - Associate degree in radiologic technology ■ Fall 2006 total enrollment was 140. Metro Business College - http://www.metrobusinesscollege.edu/ ■ Private career colleges with locations in Arnold, Cape Girardeau Jefferson City, and Rolla. ■ Programs - Associate of applied science degree (two tracks: business and computer specialist and medical specialist) - Diplomas (two tracks: business and computer assistant and medical secretary) - Certificates (three tracks: administrative assistant, massage therapy, and medical administrative assistant). ■ Fall 2006 total enrollment was 320 Exhibit 3-2 summarizes the enrollment and completion data for each institution as reported by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). Of note: ■ Total enrollment (total headcount) in Fall 2006 ranged from 130 (Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center's postsecondary enrollment) to 10,454 (Southeast Missouri State University). MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-5 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market ■ Southeast Missouri State University is the only institution that offers bachelor's and graduate degrees. Although students may complete bachelor's degrees through the community colleges, the degrees are conferred by cooperating institutions (see Section 3.6 for more information). ■ Mineral Area College was the largest provider of associate's degrees in the region in 2006-2007 (425), followed by Three Rivers Community College (364), and Shawnee Community College (254). ■ All of the institutions award certificates, the majority of which are programs lasting less than two years. EXHIBIT 3-2 LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER ENROLLMENT DATA, 2006, AND COMPLETION DATA 2006-2007 Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. 3.2 Enrollment Trends The remainder of this chapter focuses on Southeast Missouri State University (Southeast), Three Rivers Community College (TRCC), and Mineral Area College (MAC) given their proximity to Cape Girardeau and their relevance to this study. According to the Missouri Department of Higher Education, Southeast has the highest enrollment in the area with 10,628 students enrolled in Fall 2007 (Exhibit 3-3). TRCC and MAC have student populations less than one-third the size of Southeast (3,185 and 3,061, respectively). MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-6 Enrollment and Completion Rates Institution Total Master's Bachelor's enrollment degree degree (Fall 2006) (2006-2007) (2006-2007) Associate's degree (2006-2007) Certificates of 2 but less than 4 years (2006-2007) Certificates of 1 but less than 2 years (2006-2007) Certificates of less than 1 year (2006 - 2007) Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center 130 81 8 Metro Business College 320 88 57 53 Mineral Area College 2926 425 65 69 Shawnee Community College 2056 254 62 200 Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing and Health Sciences 140 43 12 7 Southeast Missouri State University 10454 192 1391 17 3 Three Rivers Community College 2996 i 364 61 19 Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. 3.2 Enrollment Trends The remainder of this chapter focuses on Southeast Missouri State University (Southeast), Three Rivers Community College (TRCC), and Mineral Area College (MAC) given their proximity to Cape Girardeau and their relevance to this study. According to the Missouri Department of Higher Education, Southeast has the highest enrollment in the area with 10,628 students enrolled in Fall 2007 (Exhibit 3-3). TRCC and MAC have student populations less than one-third the size of Southeast (3,185 and 3,061, respectively). MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-6 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-3 TOTAL HEADCOUNT FOR AREA HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS, FALL 2007 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 10,628 3,185 3,061 Southeast Missouri Three Rivers Mineral Area State University Community College College Source: Missouri Department of Higher Education, 2007. All three institutions have more full-time than part-time undergraduate enrollments, as depicted in Exhibit 3-4. Sixty-five percent of the undergraduate students at Southeast are enrolled full-time (6,893 students); 61 percent of the students at TRCC are enrolled full-time (1,942 students); and 54 percent of the students at MAC are enrolled full-time (1,663 students). MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-7 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-4 TOTAL UNDERGRADUATE HEADCOUNT FOR AREA HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS BY PART-TIME/FULL-TIME STATUS, FALL 2007 Three Rivers Community College Mineral Area College Southeast Missouri State University 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Source: Missouri Department of Higher Education, 2007. Exhibit 3-5 displays the number of students from each county in the Cape Girardeau area enrolled at the three examined institutions. Cape Girardeau County has the highest number of students enrolled at Southeast (1,966). Stoddard County had the largest number of students enrolled at TRCC (352). Bollinger County has the fewest total number of students attending any of the three colleges addressed in this chart. Scott County has the second highest number of students attending Southeast (949) and TRCC (84). These numbers represent total enrollments from each county at each instituion, including those attending various off -campus centers. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-8 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-5 TOTAL INSTITUTION ENROLLMENT PER COUNTY, FALL 2007 65 M Cape Girardeau Career and Bollinger 25 Technology Center 203 Three Rivers Community College Stoddard 3 2 I Mineral Area College -- 174 1 I I ]1 So uth e ast M isso u ri State Scott as University Cape Girardeau 444 00 . 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 Source: Missouri Department of Higher Education, 2007. 3.3 Missouri Community College Taxin_g Districts and Designated Service Areas As depicted in Exhibit 3-6, several entities are charged with serving the area surrounding Cape Girardeau. Specifically, the taxing districts and service regions associated with Mineral Area College and Three Rivers Community College are illustrated in this map. Taxing districts (gray outlines) are comprised of groupings of individual school districts that have opted, via referendum, to help support the college's operation via an additional tax levy. In return, students residing within the associated districts can attend these institutions for the most competitive rates (in -district tuition). The broader service regions (colored shading) represent larger areas designated by the Missouri Higher Education Coordinating Board for which each community college is primarily responsible for providing relevant postsecondary programs and services. However, students residing in these service areas are still subject to the colleges' out -of - district tuition rates, which are significantly higher than the in -district rates. Students residing outside of Missouri are charged a third -tier tuition rate (out-of-state), which is higher than either in -district or out -of -district rates. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-9 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-6 CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE TAXING DISTRICTS AND SERVICE AREAS -- H°lltany - Park Mills Mineral ..uemm� North • n,r•sml° centoo -- - -- College -Central - - -Waen - -' . Missouri College City 4--__ . Br°okkald Three Rivers •Recall' Men iroWiler :ollege. Chillic_°Ihe M—n Munn! ' Missouri Western Moberly Area Stale CollegefN-S Community Colleg i St. Louis Colleg ca < ¢pTinge • Moberly _ .04mmunity SLCC al Ro^-nt Valt" Metropolitan gtpn , M�xe�.� SLCC al4 aural Park SLg al Maramae Community Kan—et, Colleges Raytown _ eoapvlu •� Maple Wootls Community College . ti lana Blue River Community College Perin Valley Community College ngaurg • • 1(noL Naaler ' Setlalia GI Louis City L°ngvlew Cemmunlly College an utile ,{etinrson Clly= tnglon State Fair ion on. Community `°D1tl College nm° • 'Ga .Bonne Terre -Naya'` -' Park Mills Mineral Area - yp1i�O -- - -- College - -Waen - -' mmurtllty College;"";" City 4--__ . Carl6age Three Rivers •Recall' Men iroWiler :ollege. iHaln ordye •Wlnona, Community College slkestan/ 'Weil PIAI.. PCVI.,, Rlu'f HP.1ner '^ Hew IAun rf • ktmtlan Source: Missouri Department of Higher Education. • Bonne -Park erre Park YiiliS Mineral Area Parryvilfo College ommunity College • Cape Glraroeatl Three Rivers Dunfa, Glove •4Ylrlolnss Community . College =ton Poplar Bluff • Dlextsr -LV�eSI Plains ,� N67 Mad d •11�9f1>feA • 1 - K@unci • r r I-layt t MGT of America, Inc- Page 3-10 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market 3.4 Tuition Rates Exhibit 3-7 displays the tuition costs per credit hour for courses at Southeast Missouri State University and the current local alternatives as well as the possible alternatives of in -district rates (not available in the Cape Girardeau area) for Mineral Area College and Three Rivers Community College. The total costs for an undergraduate student taking three, six, nine, or twelve credit hours per term are shown for comparative purposes. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-11 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-7 TUITION RATES AT AREA INSTITUTIONS, 2008-2009 Source: Institutions' websites, February 2009. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-12 Fees Paid by Every Student Tuition Per Taking a 3 -hour Total Cost Per Undergraduate Course (Does not Undergraduate Cost for 3 Cost for 6 Cost for 9 Cost for 12 Credit Hour Fall 2008 include Credit Hour credit hours credit hours credit hours credit hours (Excluding Fees) application fees 2008-2009 or special lab fees) Southeast Missouri State University - Main Campus $ 184.80 $ 23.70 $208.50 $625.50 $1,251.00 $1,876.50 $2,502.00 Current Alternatives Southeast Missouri State University - Off Campus Centers* $ 119.00 $ 13.50 $132.50 $397.50 $795.00 $1,192.50 $1,590.00 Career and Technology Center - Mineral Area** $108.00 $324.00 $648.00 $972.00 $1,296.00 Mineral Area College, Out -of -District $108.00 $324.00 $648.00 $972.00 $1,296.00 Three Rivers Community College, Out -of -District $ 107.00 $ 13.50 $120.50 $361.50 $723.00 $1,084.50 $1,446.00 Shawnee Community College - MO resident $100.00 $300.00 $600.00 $900.00 $1,200.00 In -District Rates (Not available locally) Mineral Area College, In -District $83.00 $249.00 $498.00 $747.00 $996.00 Three Rivers Community College, In -District $ 67.00 $ 13.50 $80.50 $241.50 $483.00 $724.50 $966.00 ** Southeast rate of $132 is for 000-200 courses only * CTC rates are for students enrolled in the technical programs only. Students not in those programs, or who are not provisionally accepted to Southeast, are charged a rate of $183 per credit hour. Students provisionally accepted at Southeast pay the Southeast Main Campus rate of $208.50. Note: Some institutions make no distinction between tuition and fees, so some cells in these columns are intentionally left blank. Note: Shawnee Community College in-state students pay $72 per credit hour, while Missouri students from Cape Girardeau and Scot counties pay a discounted rate of $100 per credit hour. Students from all other Missouri counties pay $108 per credit hour. Note: The Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing and Health Sciences 2008-09 tuition rate for all students is $299.75 per credit hour. Note: The 2008-09 SIU -Carbondale tuition for non -Illinois residents is $17,437.50 and is based on 15 credit hours per semester. The cost per credit hour for a Cape Girardeau student would be $581 per credit hour. Source: Institutions' websites, February 2009. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-12 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market It should also be noted that the Missouri A+ scholarship program allows graduates in good standing from participating high schools to attend in-state public two-year degree programs at virtually no tutition cost. However, the A+ program does not cover all high schools in the state or in the Cape Girardeau region, and is not applicable to enrollment at public four-year instituions. Southeast Missouri State has developed some comparable financial aid options that attempt to bridge this gap for entering freshmen. 3.5 Program Inventory by Level This section presents program inventories for Southeast Missouri State University, Mineral Area College, Three Rivers Community College, and Shawnee Community College by program level. These inventories provide an overview of program offerings, but do not reflect the institutional capacity to absorb more students into specific course or discipline programs of study. Also of note: ■ Southeast Missouri State University and Mineral Area College offer courses at the Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center, which is within the study area designated for this project. ■ Southeast Missouri State University and Three Rivers Community College host centers in Sikeston, which is within the southern most boundary of the study area designated for this project. Also, Southeast Missouri State University and Mineral Area College both offer courses at the Perryville Area Higher Education Center (PAHEC). Perryville is not within the study area, but is included because it is within close proximity of most Cape Girardeau County residents. The course offerings at these centers change over time in order to meet student demand. In addition, the centers rely on distance learning technologies, such as ITV, to provide access to courses delivered on the institutions' main campuses. ■ Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing and Health Sciences offers programs in nursing, surgical technology, medical technology/clinical laboratory science, and radiologic technology, as described in Section 3.1. ■ Metro Business College offers administrative assistant, business and computer specialist, business and computer assistant, massage therapy, medical administrative assistant, medical secretary, and medical specialist programs, as described in Section 3.1. ■ Some Missouri students, including residents of Cape Girardeau County, travel to Shawnee Community College in Ullin, Illinois rather than pursue in-state higher education opportunities. Shawnee offers discount tuition for some Missouri students, as noted in Exhibit 3-7. ■ Mineral Area College, Three Rivers Community College, and Shawnee Community College offer wide varieties of certificate and associate degree programs. However, unless Cape Girardeau -area students drive to the colleges' main campuses, they are limited to the programs offered at the Career and Technology Center, the Perryville Area Higher Education Center, and the Southeast Missouri State and Three Rivers Centers in Sikeston. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-13 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market Furthermore, the course offerings at those locations can change from year-to- year, and few programs can be completed in full without traveling to the colleges' main campuses. Southeast Missouri State University has limited certificate and associate degree offerings. ■ Of the associate's degrees offered by the community colleges, there is a large mix of applied degrees (e.g., the associate's of applied science) and transfer degrees (e.g., the associate's of art and the associate's of science). ■ There is significant access to baccalaureate degrees in Cape Girardeau County through Southeast Missouri State University. Access to bachelor degree programs in the outlying areas is somewhat limited, though Mineral Area College, Three Rivers Community College, and Shawnee Community Colleges all offer some bachelor's degrees in cooperation with four-year institutions. Of those offerings, there is heavy emphasis on education degree programs. Southeast Missouri State University Southeast Missouri State University primarily offers bachelor degree programs, but students may also pursue certificates, associate's degrees, and graduate programs. In addition to its campuses in Cape Girardeau (main campus and river campus), Southeast offers courses at the Perryville Area Higher Education Center (PAHEC) and at its centers in Kennett, Malden, and Sikeston. Students may also complete one degree program at the Kennett Center and five degree programs at the Sikeston Center, as noted in the chart below. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-14 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-8 SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Southeast Missouri State University Certificates Administrative Assistant Design Drafting Electronics Graphic Technology Associate's Degrees Child Care & Guidance AA Computer Technology (Automated Manufacturing) AAS Computer Technology (Microcomputer Systems) AAS Computer Technology (Technical Computer Graphics) AAS Dental Hygiene' AS Bachelor's Degrees Accounting BSBA Administrative Systems Management BSBA Agribusiness (Agriculture Industry) BS Agribusiness (Animal Science) BS Agribusiness (Horticulture) BS Agribusiness (Plant & Soil Science) BS Anthropology BA Art BA, BFA, BSEd Athletic Training BS Biology BS Biology (Biomedical Sciences) BS Biology (Microbiology, Cellular & Molecular, Biotechnology) BS Biology (Organismal, Ecological & Evolutionary) BS Biology (Wildlife & Conservation) BS Biology Education BSEd Biology Education (Unified Science) BSEd Business & Marketing Education BSEd Business (International) BSBA Chemistry BA, BS Chemistry (American Chemical Society Certified) BS Chemistry (Biochemistry) BS Chemistry (Business) BS Chemistry (DNA Analysis) BA Chemistry (Forensic Chemistry) BS Chemistry (Forensic Science) BA MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-15 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-8 (Continued) SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Bachelor's Degrees Chemistry Education BSEd Communication Disorders BS Communication Studies BA Computer Information Systems BS Computer Science BS Corporate Communication BS Criminal Justice (Correction S)2,4 BS Criminal Justice (Law Enforcement) BS Criminal Justice (Security Management) BS Economics BA Economics (Business) BSBA Economics (Financial) BSBA Education (Art) BSEd Education (Biology) BSEd Education (Business) BSEd Education (Chemistry) BSEd Education (Early Childhood )4 BSEd Education (Elementary)4 BSEd Education (English) BSEd Education (Exceptional Child )4 BSEd Education (Family & Consumer Science) BSEd Education (French) BSEd Education (German) BSEd Education (Industrial) BSEd Education (Mathematics) BSEd Education (Middle School) BSEd Education (Music) BME Education (Physical) BSEd Education (Physics) BSEd Education (Social Studies) BSEd Education (Spanish) BSEd Education (Speech & Theatre) BSEd Education (Unified Science - Biology) BSEd Education (Unified Science - Chemistry) BSEd Education (Unified Science - Physics) BSEd Engineering Physics (Computer Applications) BS Engineering Physics (Electrical Applications) BS Engineering Physics (Mechanical Applications) BS MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-16 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-8 (Continued) SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Bachelor's Degrees Engineering Technology (Electrical & Control) BS Engineering Technology (Mechanical & Manufacturing Systems) BS English BSEd English (Literature) BA English (Writing) BA Environmental Science BS Family & Consumer Sciences Education BSEd Finance BSBA French BA, BSEd General Studies2'3 BGS German BA, BSEd Global Studies BA Health Management (Exercise Science) BS Health Management (Health Promotion) BS Historic Preservation BS History BA Hospitality Management BS Human Environmental Studies (Child Development)2 BS Human Environmental Studies (Dietetics) BS Human Environmental Studies (Family Studies) BS Human Environmental Studies (Fashion Merchandising) BS Human Environmental Studies (Housing & Interior Design) BS Industrial Education BSEd Industrial Technology (Computer & Multimedia Graphics) BS Industrial Technology (Construction Management & Design) BS Industrial Technology (Facilities Management) BS Industrial Technology (Industrial Management) BS Industrial Technology (Technology Management) BS Industrial Technology (Telecommunications & Computer BS Interdisciplinary Studies2 BS Management BSBA Management (Entrepreneurship) BSBA Management (Human Resource) BSBA Management Information Systems BSBA Marketing (Integrated Marketing Communications) BSBA Marketing (Management) BSBA Mass Communication (Advertising) BS Mass Communication (Journalism) BA Mass Communication (Public Relations) I BS MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-17 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-8 (Continued) SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Bachelor's Degrees Mass Communication (Radio) BS Mass Communication (Television & Film) BS Mathematics (Applied & Statistics) BS Mathematics (Pure) BS Mathematics Education BSEd Medical Technology BS Music BA Music (Composition) BM Music (Instrumental Performance) BM Music (Vocal Performance) BM Music Education BME Nursing BSN Organizational Administration BSBA Performing Arts (Acting/Directing) BFA Performing Arts (Dance) BFA Performing Arts (Design/Technology) BFA Performing Arts (Musical Theatre) BFA Philosophy BA Physical Education BSEd Physics BS Physics Education BSEd Political Science BA, BS Pre -Architecture V Pre -Chiropractic V Pre -Dentistry V Pre -Engineering V Pre -Medicine V Pre -Optometry V Pre -Pharmacy V Pre -Physical Therapy V Pre -Veterinary Medicine V Pre -Vocational Agriculture Education V Psychology BS Recreation BS Social Studies BSEd Social Work BS Spanish BA, BSEd Speech & Theatre Education BSEd Sport Management BS Theatre & Dance I BA MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-18 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-8 (Continued) SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Master's Degrees Accounting MBA Biology MNS Business (International) MBA Chemistry MNS Communication Disorders MA Community Wellness & Leisure Studies MPA Counseling (Community)4 MA Counseling (School )4 MA Criminal Justice MS Education (Elementary) MA Education (Exceptional Child) MA Education (Music) MME Education (Science) MNS Education (Secondary) MA English MA Health Administration MBA Higher Education Administration MA History MA Human Environmental Studies MA Management MBA Management (Environmental) MBA Management (Financial) MBA Management (Industrial) MBA, MS Mathematics MNS Music Education MME Nursing MSN Nutrition & Exercise Science MS Public Administration MPA School Administration MA Science Education MNS Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) I MA MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-19 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-8 (Continued) SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Specialist Degrees Education (Counseling) EdS Educational Administration EdS Educational Leadership Development4 EdS Doctoral lEducational Leadership' I EdD Source: Southeast Missouri's website. Program offered at the Sikeston Center with Missouri Southern State University. 2 Program can be completed at the Sikeston Center. 3 Program can be completed at the Kennett Center. 4 Program also offered at the Perryville Area Higher Education Center. 5 Program offered with University of Missouri. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-20 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market Mineral Area College Mineral Area College primarily offers certificate and associate degree programs, but students may also pursue baccalaureate and graduate degree programs in cooperation with Central Methodist University. In addition to its main campus in Park Hills, Mineral Area College also offers courses at the Perryville Area Higher Education Center (PAHEC) and at five other outreach centers within its service region (Arcadia Valley, Farmington, Fredericktown, Potosi, and Winona). EXHIBIT 3-9 MINERAL AREA COLLEGE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Mineral Area College Certificates Auto Collision Technology* Automotive Technology * Business Computer Programming Business Management Child Development Computer Networking Construction & Building Technology* Criminal Justice Culinary Arts (Culinary Arts Technology)* Emergency Medical Technician Fire Science Technology Floral Design & Flower Shop Maintenance Graphic Arts & Printing Technology* Heating, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Technology* Horticulture Services Operations Industrial Maintenance Machine Tool Technology (Machine Technology)* Manufacturing Supervision MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-21 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-9 (Continued) MINERAL AREA COLLEGE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Certificates Medical Coding (Medical Coding Specialist) Office Systems Technology Operations Management & Manufacturing Supervision Practical Nursing (PN) Radio TV Broadcasting Production Technology* Technology Welding Technology* Associate's Degrees Agribusiness AAS Art AA Associate of General Studies AGS Auto Collision Technology* AAS Automotive Technology* AAS Banking & Finance AAS Biological Science AA Biology AA Business AA Business Administration AA Business Computer Programming AAS Business Management AAS Business Management - Accounting AAS Business Management - Microcomputers AAS Chemistry AA Child Development AAS Civil & Construction Technology AAS Computer Networking AAS Computer Science AA Construction & Building Technology* AAS Criminal Justice AAS Culinary Arts (Culinary Arts Technology)* AAS Earth Science AA Education AA, AAT Electrical & Electronic Technology AAS English AA Fire Science Technology AAS Foreign Language AA Graphic Arts & Printing Technology* AAS Heating, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Technology* AAS MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-22 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-9 (Continued) MINERAL AREA COLLEGE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Associate's Degrees History AA Horticulture Services Operations AAS Industrial Maintenance AAS Information Systems AA Machine Tool Technology (Machine Technology)* AAS Manufacturing Supervision AAS Mass Communication AA Mathematics AA Medical Coding (Medical Coding Specialist) AAS Medical Technology (Radiology) AS Medical Technology (Respiratory Therapy) AS Music AA Nursing AS Occupational Education AAS Occupational, Safety, Health & Environmental Technology AAS Office Systems Technology AAS Operations Management & Manufacturing Supervision AAS Physical Education AA Physical Science AA Physics AA Political Science AA Pre -Architecture AA Pre -Engineering AA, AS Pre -Forestry AA Pre -Journalism AA Pre -Law AA Pre -Medicine AA Pre -Pharmacy AA Pre -Physical Therapy AA Psychology AA Radio TV Broadcasting Production Technology* AAS Skilled Trades* AAS Social Studies AA Social Work AA Speech AA Technology I AAS MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-23 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-9 (Continued) MINERAL AREA COLLEGE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Associate's Degrees Theatre Arts AA Welding Technology* AAS Bachelor's Degrees Accounting BA Business BA, BS, BAS Business Education BA, BS, BAS Child Development BA, BS Computer Science BA, BS Criminal Justice BA, BS Education (Early Childhood) BA, BS Education (Elementary) BA, BS Education (Special) BA, BS General Studies BA, BS Mathematics BA, BS Nursing BSN Psychology BA, BS, BAS Public Administration BA, BS Sociology BA, BS Master's Degrees Clinical Counseling MS Education MEd Source: Mineral Area website. Mineral Area also hosts Law Enforcement & Fire Academies, and collaborates with four area career and technical centers to offer some degrees or certificates. * Program offered in collaboration with area career & technology centers. Three Rivers Community College Three Rivers Community College primarily offers certificates and associate degree programs, but students may also pursue a variety of bachelor's degree programs and some graduate programs. In addition to its campus in Poplar Bluff, Three Rivers offers courses at its centers in Campbell, Kennett, Malden, Portageville, and Sikeston. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-24 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-10 THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Three Rivers Community College Certificates Accounting Applied Technology Certified Professional Secretary Criminal Justice Early Childhood Development Electrician Technician Emergency Medical Services (Basic, Refresher/Bridge, First Responder) Emergency Medical Services (Paramedic ) Environmental/Occupational Safety & Health Technology Hospitality & Tourism Industrial Technician Information Publishing Information Systems Technology Machine Shop Management & Supervision Marketing & Merchandising Microcomputer Support Technology Quality Control Technician Sales Surgical Technology Surveying Associate's Degrees Accounting AAS Accounting Technology AAS Administration of Justice AS Agribusiness AAS Agriculture AA Agritechnology AAS Applied Technology AAS Auto Collision Technology AAS Auto Service Technology AAS Automated Manufacturing Systems AAS Biological Sciences AA Building Trades Technology AAS Business Administration AA Business Education AA MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-25 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-10 (Continued) THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Associate's Degrees Business Management AAS, AA, AS Chemistry AA Child Care AAS Child Development AAS Civil & Construction Technology AAS Computer Maintenance Technology AAS Cosmetology Technology AAS Criminal Justice AAS Culinary Arts (Culinary Arts Technology) AAS Diesel Technology AAS Drafting & Manufacturing Technology AAS Early Childhood Development AAS Education (Early Childhood) AA, AAS Education (Elementary) AA, AAT, AAS Education (Middle School) AA, AAT Education (Mid -Level Elementary) AA Education (Secondary) AA Emergency Medical Services (Paramedic) AAS English AA Environmental Horticulture AA Environmental/Occupational Safety & Health Technology AAS Forensic Science AA Forestry AA Forestry Technology AAS Graphic Communications Technology AAS History AA HVAC Technology AAS Industrial Maintenance AAS Information Systems Technology AAS Library Science AA Machine Tool Technology (Machine Technology) AAS Manufacturing Technology AAS Mass Communication AA Mathematics AA Medical Laboratory Technology AAS Music AA Networl< Administration AAS Nursing AAS Occupational Education AAS MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-26 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-10 (Continued) THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Associate's Degrees Organizational Management AA, AAS Paraprofessional Educator AAS Physical Education AA Physical Science AA Political Science AA Power Plant AAS Pre -Engineering AA, AS Pre -Journalism AA Pre -Law AA Pre -Medicine AA Pre -Optometry AA Pre -Pharmacy AA Pre -Social Work AA Pre -Sports Medicine AA Pre -Veterinary Medicine AA Psychology AA Religious Studies AA Sociology AA Spanish AA Speech & Theater AA Speech Communications AA Television/Radio Production AAS Welding Technology AAS Bachelor's Degrees Accounting' BS Administration ofJustice 2 BAS Business Management"5 BS Child Development2 BS, BAS Criminal Justice BS Education (Early Childhood )2,1 BSEd Education (Elementary)2,3,6 BSEd Education (English )6 BSEd Education (Exceptional Child )6 BSEd Education (Middle School)' BSEd Managements BS Nursing' BSN Organizational Management2'4 BS, BAS Social Work BS MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-27 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-10 (Continued) THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Master's Degrees Business Administration? MBA Community Counseling6 MA Educations MEd School Counseling6 MA Specialist Degrees Education Administration EdS Educational Leadership Administration EdS Source: Three Rivers website. Program offered online with Northwest Missouri State University. 2 Program offered with Hannibal -LaGrange College. 3 Program offered with Southeast Missouri State University. 4 Program offered online with Southeast Missouri State University. 5 Program offered at Sikeston with William Woods University. 6 Program offered at Sikeston with Southeast Missouri State University. Program offered at Kennett with William Woods University. Shawnee Community College Shawnee Community College primarily offers certificates and associate's degrees, but students may also pursue two bachelor's degree programs. The majority of Shawnee's courses are offered at its main campus in Ullin, Illinois, but the college collaborates with a variety of institutions and also offers courses at the East St. Louis Community College Center. Shawnee offers residents of four Missouri counties (Cape Girardeau, Mississippi, New Madrid, and Scott) reduced tuition rates, as shown in Exhibit 3-7. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-28 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-11 SHAWNEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS IShawnee Community College I Certificates ministration of Justice Alcohol & Other Drug Abuse Counseling' Appliance Repair Appliance Technology Auto Body Repair Automotive Technician Assistant Automotive Technology' Basic Industry Entrepreneurship Catering Combination Welding Computer Forensics & Investigation Computer Information Systems Generalist Computer System Technician Construction Craft Laborer Apprenticeship2 Cosmetology Cosmetology Instructor Training Direct Support Provider Education (Early Childhood)- Teacher Aid Electricity (Basic) Electronics Technician Fire Fighting Heating & Air Conditioning Information Processing Introduction to Accounting Massage Therapy Medical Coding (Medical Coding Specialist) Medical Office Assistant Medical Transcription' Network Specialist Nurse Assistant - Basic' Nurse Assistant Training (CNA) Office Assistant Paraprofessional Educator Practical Nursing (PN) Real Estate - Appraisal Security Officer Training (Basi MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-29 Current Supply of Postsecondary Education to the Local Market EXHIBIT 3-11 (Continued) SHAWNEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS Certificates Surgical Technology Truck Driving' Veterinary Therapy Assistant3 Webmaster Associate's Degrees Agriculture AA Agriculture Education AA Correctional Officer (Youth Supervisor)4 AAS Corrections (Parole Officer)4 AAS Education (Elementary) AA Engineering Science AES Fine Arts AFA General Studies AGS General Transfer AA, AS Health Information Technology3 AAS Medical Laboratory Technology3 AAS Natural Resource Management AA Nursing AAS (ADN) Occupational Therapy Assistant3 AAS Pre -Engineering AES Professional Inside Wireman5 AAS Bachelor's Degrees Business Management6 BS Nursing' BSN Source: Shawnee website. Shawnee also collaborates with John A. Logan College, Rend Lake College, Southwestern Illinois College, Southeastern Illinois College, and Kaskaskia College. 1 Program offered with East St. Louis Community College Center. 2 Program offered with IL Laborers and Contractors. 3 Program offered with Southern IL Collegiate Common Market. 4 Program offered with the IL Department of Corrections. 5 Program offered with the Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. 6 Program offered with Mid -Continent University. ' Program offered with McKendree College. 3.6 Conclusion This chapter offered an overview of higher education providers in the Cape Girardeau area, including their taxing districts and service areas, enrollments, tuition rates, and program inventories. Overall, the institutions' inventories of programs and disciplines are robust, but it should be noted that many are not readily offered away from their respective main campuses. This is particularly significant in terms of accessibility, as there is no main/full-service campus of a community college located in Cape Girardeau County, the central point of the regional population. This serves as the foundation for identification of program needs, as discussed in Chapter 4.0. MGT of America, Inc. Page 3-30 4.0 IDENTIFIED PROGRAM NEEDS 4.0 IDENTIFIED PROGRAM NEEDS The higher education providers in the Cape Girardeau area offer a wide range of academic programs and varied delivery methodologies, yet some students still leave the area to pursue higher education due to the lack of locally available academic programs of interest to them. This chapter details the program areas of most interest to students as well as preferred delivery options as expressed in the high school and postsecondary student surveys, as well as program needs and delivery preferences expressed in the survey of local employers. Coupled with the demographic and economic data presented in Chapter 2.0, the data presented in this chapter help to establish and quantify the levels and areas of need for educational and training services among various constituent groups in the Cape Girardeau area. 4.1 Student Needs and Preferences This section presents the findings from surveys of local high school and postsecondary students conducted by MGT of America in Fall/Winter 2008. Independent surveys were administered at 15 local high schools, the Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center, Mineral Area College, Three Rivers Community College, and Southeast Missouri State University. 4.1.1 Student Program Needs and Interests Nearly 15 percent of high school student survey respondents indicated that educational programs of interest to them were unavailable locally, as shown in Exhibit 4-1. Written responses to the question seeking program names and degree levels varied widely and included engineering, midwifery, radiology, and zoology. It should be noted that responses indicating that programs of interest are not available locally may also reflect a lack of awareness regarding existing programs offered by local providers. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-1 Identified Program Needs EXHIBIT 4-1 ARE THERE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS OF INTEREST TO YOU THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE LOCALLY? Yes IIm No response Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, Fall/ Winter 2008. High school student survey respondents were also specifically asked to indicate their intended field of study for their first college degrees. Of the 598 students who responded to this question, approximately 4 percent indicated that they do not plan to attend college. Otherwise, the most frequently indicated field was nursing (about 7 percent of respondents). The full frequencies of responses for these students are shown in Exhibit 4-2. Among those who responded "other", written responses varied widely and included cosmetology, musical theater, plastic surgery, and welding. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-2 Identified Program Needs EXHIBIT 4-2 INTENDED FIELD OF STUDY FOR HIGH SCHOOL RESPONDENTS' FIRST COLLEGE DEGREES Intended field of study for first college degree % (n=598) Other 10.03% Nursing 7.02% Undecided 5.35% Pre -Med 4.35% 1 do not plan to go to college 4.35% Teacher Education (Elementary/Secondary 4.01% Mechanical Engineering 3.85% Physical Therapy 2.84% Construction Trades 2.68% Animal/Veterinary Science 2.51% Management General 2.51% Criminal Justice 2.51% Mechanics, Repairers and Technicians 2.34% Computer Information Sciences 2.17% Physical Education 2.01% Architechture 1.84% Music 1.84% Graphic Design 1.679/. Computer Engineering 1.67% Dental Hygiene 1.67% Cosmetology 1.51% Biology 1.51% Psychology (General) 1.51% Broadcast Media 1.34% Other Health Technologies 1.34% Military 1.34% Agricultural Business 1.17% Accounting 1.17% Pre -Law 1.17% Art 1.17% Marketing and Sales 1.00% Emergency Medical Technician 1.00% Finance 0.84% Electrical Engineering 0.84% Other Thera 0.84% Political Science 0.84% Intended field of study for first college degree % (n=598) Agriculture 0.67% Environmental Science 0.67% Aviation 0.67% Protective Services/Law Enforcement 0.67% Engineering Technology 0.67% History 0.67% Psychology Child 0.67% Sociology/Social Work 0.67% Print Media 0.50% Educational Administration 0.50% Civil and Environmental Engineering 0.50% Industrial Engineering 0.50% Literature 0.50% Respiratory Therapy 0.50% Family and Child Services 0.50% Nutrition, Food and Exercise Science 0.50% Interior Design 0.33% Chemical Engineering 0.33% English 0.33% Foreign Language 0.33% Technology 0.33% Health Administration 0.33% Chemistry 0.33% Physics 0.33% Anthropology 0.33% Horticulture 0.17% Information and Management Services 0.17% Risk Management/Insurance & Real Estate 0.17% Special Education 0.17% Philosophy 0.177% Theology/Religious Studies 0.17% Diagnostic Imaging 0.17% Textiles and Consumer Science 0.17% Interpersonal Skills/Leadership 0.17% Astronomy 0.17% Theater 0.17% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, FallMinter 2008. Postsecondary students were also asked to indicate the intended field of their next degrees. Nearly one-quarter of respondents intend to pursue nursing degrees (24.9 percent), as shown in Exhibit 4-3. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-3 Identified Program Needs EXHIBIT 4-3 INTENDED FIELDS OF STUDY FOR POSTSECONDARY RESPONDENTS' NEXT COLLEGE DEGREES Intended field of study for next college degree % (n=245) Nursing 24.9% Teacher Education (Elementary/Secondary) 8.2% Other 6.1% Accounting 4.5% Management General 3.7% Respiratory Therapy 3.7% Sociology/Social Work 3.3% Criminal Justice 2.9% Dental Hygiene 2.9% Pre -Med 2.4% Psychology General 2.4% Computer Information Sciences 2.0% Undecided 2.0% Graphic Design 1.6% Broadcast Media 1.6% Protective Services/Law Enforcement 1.6% Physical Education 1.6% Mechanical Engineering 1.6% Animal/Veterinary Science 1.2% Horticulture 1.2% Finance 1.2% General Studies 1.2% General Studies (Liberal Arts) 1.2% Art 1.2% Hospitality Administration 0.8% Intended field of study for next college degree % (n=245) Print Media 0.8% Special Education 0.8% Civil and Environmental Engineering 0.8% Electrical Engineering 0.8% Technology 0.8% Physical Therapy 0.8% Mechanics, Repairers and Technicians 0.8% Biology 0.8% Chemistry 0.8% Psychology (Child) 0.8% Music 0.8% Agricultural Business 0.4% Marketing and Sales 0.4% Pre -Law 0.4% Chemical Engineering 0.4% Computer Engineering 0.4% Industrial Engineering 0.4% English 0.4% Mathematics 0.4% Philosophy 0.4% Other Health Technologies 0.4% Other Therapy 0.4% Nutrition, Food and Exercise Science 0.4% Recreation, Parks, Hospitality, and Tourism 0.4% Political Science 0.4% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, Fall/Winter 2008. 4.1.2 Student Delivery Preferences Post -secondary student survey respondents were asked about their preferred methods of course delivery and the results are shown in Exhibit 4-4. The overwhelming majority (82.9 percent) of students prefer traditional, face-to-face classroom instruction. CD/DVD course delivery is the least popular option with 66.1 percent of respondents indicating that this method is not desirable. Additionally, traditional -length courses are the preferred option for 49 percent of respondents and weekend courses are not a desirable option for 64.6 percent of respondents. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-4 Identified Program Needs EXHIBIT 4-4 PREFERRED COURSE DELIVERY OPTIONS OF POSTSECONDARY STUDENT RESPONDENTS Preferred Course Delivery Options (n=283) Preferable Acceptable Not desirable Traditional face-to-face classroom instruction (n=245) 82.9% 15.5% 1.6% Internet or Web -based courses (n=244) 18.4% 59.0% 22.5% CD/DVD (n=239) 5.4% 28.5% 66.1% Preferred Course Delivery Options Preferable Acceptable Not desirable Traditional length courses 15-16 weeks n=241 49.0% 47.7% 3.3% Accelerated courses (shorter term) (n=244) 22.5% 62.3% 15.2% Weekend courses (n=243) 5.8% 29.6% 64.6% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, FalUWinter 2008. These students were also asked to indicate which days of the week were best for taking courses, and were allowed to select multiple days; their most desirable days are Tuesday and Thursday (see Exhibit 4-5). Eighteen percent of students indicated that they had no preference regarding course delivery days. Consistent with the findings portrayed in Exhibit 4-4, Saturday and Sunday were the least popular choices. EXHIBIT 4-5 MOST DESIRABLE DAY OF THE WEEK FOR COURSES Which days of the week are best for you to take courses? (n=283) Monday 58.0% Tuesday 61.1% Wednesday 56.2% Thursday 61.5% Friday 43.1% Saturday 3.9% Sunday 1.8% No preference Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, Fall/Winter 2008. More than half of respondents (54.9 percent) indicated that morning is their preferred time of day for coursework (see Exhibit 4-6). Night classes were the least preferred option for postsecondary student respondents, as 51.6 percent indicated that this option is not desirable. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-5 Identified Program Needs EXHIBIT 4-6 MOST DESIRABLE TIME OF DAY FOR COURSES Which time of day is best for you to take courses? Preferable Acceptable Not desirable Mornings (8am-1lam) (n=244) 54.90% 27.97% 17.13% Lunchtime (11am-1pm) (n=240) 45.04% 36.17% 18.79% Afternoon (fpm-4pm) (n=239) 36.65% 40.57% 22.78% Evening (4pm-6pm) (n=235) 22.58%1 39.78% 37.63% Night (6pm-9pm) (n=237) 19.22%1 29.18% 51.60% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, FaIlMinter 2008. 4.2 Employer Needs and Preferences This section presents the findings from a survey of local employers conducted by MGT of America, Inc., in Fall/Winter 2008. The survey covered a large sample of businesses from a variety of industries located throughout Cape Girardeau, Bollinger, Scott, and Stoddard counties. 4.2.1 Employer Program Needs A wide variety of education and training needs were expressed by the pool of respondents (Exhibit 4-7). Foremost among these needs were job -specific opportunities (48 percent), technology training (44 percent), and high school diploma or GED training (42 percent). MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-6 Identified Program Needs EXHIBIT 4-7 EDUCATION AND TRAINING NEEDS What kinds of educational or training activities are most needed by your employees? (Check all that apply.) Other (please specify) _ 5.8% Technology training/certification 44.2% Continuing professional education 29.1% College degrees - Graduate 20.9% College degrees - Bachelor's 34.9% College degrees - Associate 17.4% Certificate programs 20.9% Job -specific education and training 47.7% HS Diploma/ 41.9% GED completion Basic skills (e.g., reading, math) 34.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FallMinter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-7 Identified Program Needs Three factors stood out among items of importance in decision-making regarding training for employees (Exhibit 4-8): the most frequently cited issues were cost of instruction (72 percent), convenience — in terms of location or time (65 percent), and quality of instruction (64 percent). EXHIBIT 4-8 IMPORTANCE OF FACTORS IN SELECTION OF TRAINING What factors weigh most heavily in your decision of how to provide education and training to your employees? (Check all that apply.) Other (please specify) = 7.0% The ability of a higher education institution to 30.2% provide the needed education and training Quality of instruction 64.0% My organization's technological capacity (e.g., - 14.0% computing) Convenience (e.g., location or time) 65.1% Cost of instruction 72.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FallMinter 2008. When queried about the types and numbers of staff they expect to hire over the next five years, respondents' feedback reflected the previously reported current staffing levels. Exhibit 4-9 details the summative low-end and high-end estimates of all of the firms' responses for various occupational groups. Summing the total of these estimates and dividing by the estimates for the total number of employees currently employed by responding firms, the results suggest projected annual growth of approximately one to three percent over the next five years. In the general context of employment growth estimates, this reflects a fairly conservative (and perhaps realistic) outlook among respondents, most likely driven by the current economic downturn. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-8 Identified Program Needs EXHIBIT 4-9 FIVE-YEAR STAFFING GROWTH ESTIMATES BY CLASS Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FaIlMinter 2008. The various segments of responses to this question (still referring to Exhibit 4-9) can be divided between occupational classes with needs for basic skills training and/or various job -specific training — the general labor and clerical segments — and those occupations that require more formal education and training opportunities — technical or paraprofessional, professional, and management segments. In the first segment, employers estimated hiring between 235 and 400 general laborers along with 98 to 230 clerical workers over this five-year period. Estimates offered for the occupational classes requiring more formalized training totaled 88 to 190 technical or paraprofessional hires, 171 to 350 professional hires, and 48 to 180 management hires. A simple extrapolation of these figures to the full area workforce entails a multiple of 8.33 to yield total market estimates'. Assuming the estimates are accurate, this suggests between 2,700 and 5,300 hires requiring the basic skills training, and 2,500 to 6,000 hires requiring more formalized training. This roughly equates to hiring needs of between 500 and 1,200 positions in either category. ' Based on the sample representing 12 percent of the workforce — that is, 12 percent multiplied by 8.33 equals 100%. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-9 Identified Program Needs Exhibit 4-10 depicts employers' estimates for anticipated shortages of trained workers by occupational group over the next five years. Health-related occupations collectively represented the largest volume of unfilled openings identified by respondents, with shortages including: ■ 352 positions anticipated in various allied health professions (nursing, EMTs, etc.). ■ 47 positions in health technologist positions (including radiological technicians). ■ 30 positions in various therapy -related positions. ■ 15 openings for health professionals (physicians, pharmacists, etc.). Other occupational groups frequently cited for anticipated shortages included: ■ 208 skilled trade positions (including carpentry). ■ 102 managers (including levels ranging from executives to front-line retail or hospitality positions). ■ 92 IT and computer science related positions. ■ 87 teaching positions. ■ 77 protective services positions (law enforcement and firefighters). To substantiate the needs indicated by respondents in the healthcare sector, MGT reviewed the job listings displayed on the websites of the two major healthcare employers in the area, Southeast Missouri Hospital and Saint Francis Medical Center. As of February 2009, these entities were advertising openings for 69 combined positions: 18 at Southeast Missouri Hospital (including 11 nursing -related) and 51 at Saint Francis Medical Center (including 25 nursing -related). MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-10 Identified Program Needs EXHIBIT 4-10 FIVE-YEAR SHORTAGES BY OCCUPATIONAL GROUP For which occupations do you anticipate a shortage of qualified applicants over the next five years (e.g., engineer, computer technician, accountant)? Please rank, beginning with the area of highest anticipated need. allied health (nurses, EMTs, etc.) skilled trades managers IT & computer science teachers protective services other sales & customer service administrative & clerical health technicians (radiology techs, etc.) technical & mechanical general labor health therapists (PT, OT, etc.) food service workers health professions (MDs, PharmDs, etc.) drivers & operators industrial & manufacturing engineering, architecture & related accounting finance marketing & PR AW 352 AW& 208 102 92 87 77 I 55 53 51 47 45 33 30 1111110 20 M 15 ■ 13 ■10 ■10 17 16 13 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Estimated Needs Over 5 Years Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-11 Identified Program Needs Exhibit 4-11 depicts the results of a query regarding the specific types of training programs and levels needed by responding organizations for their employees. Two particular programs were cited by more than one-fifth (20 percent) of respondents: ■ 26 percent indicated needs for teacher education (elementary and secondary levels). ■ 23 percent indicated needs for management -related training. Other programs cited by 10 percent or more of the respondent pool included: ■ Computer and information sciences (19 percent). ■ Marketing and sales (16 percent). ■ Special education (15 percent). ■ Accounting (14 percent). ■ Finance (12 percent). ■ Construction trades (12 percent). ■ Interpersonal skills or leadership training (11 percent) ■ Manufacturing or production related training (11 percent). At least 45 other specific training or education programs were listed by respondents, indicating a broad array of needs among this sample of local employers. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-12 Identified Program Needs EXHIBIT 4-11 FIELDS/DISCIPLINES IN WHICH EMPLOYEES WILL NEED THE MOST TRAINING OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS: TOP 10 RESPONSES Teacher Education (Elementary/Secondary) Management (General) Computer & Information Sciences Marketing & Sales Special Education Accounting Construction Trades (Carpentry, Welding, etc.) Finance Manufacturing/Production Interpersonal Skills/Leadership 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-13 26.0% 213% 9.2% 16.4° 15.1% 3.7% % % 12. 12. 11.0% 11.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-13 Identified Program Needs In terms of the levels of educational programs that desired among respondents (Exhibit 4-12), graduate or professional programs were most frequently cited, followed closely by two-year programs and certificate programs. Demand for bachelor's -level programs lagged somewhat behind other levels. EXHIBIT 4-12 SPECIFIC TRAINING PROGRAM LEVELS Level of education selected for program needs Graduate or Professional 86 Programs 4 -Year (Bachelor's) 37 Degree Programs 2 -Year (Associate) Degree Programs do 83 Certificate Programs 79 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FaIlMinter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-14 Identified Program Needs Southeast Missouri State University was selected as the overall most frequently relied on provider of training and education (35 percent, as depicted in Exhibit 4-13). Smaller proportions of respondents indicated either industry -specific or professional trade -related organizations (14 percent) or the Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center (10 percent). It should be noted that references to the Career and Technology Center may refer to programs offered through the Center by partner organizations including Mineral Area College or Three Rivers Community College. EXHIBIT 4-13 MOST FREQUENT PROVIDER Which entity do you rely upon the most for education and training? Southeast Missouri State University 34.9% Various Industry -Specific and Professional/Trade- 14.3% Related Organizations Cape Girardeau Career & Technology Center � 9.5% Three Rivers Community College , 1.6% In -House Training M6.3% No Postsecondary Education Required M6.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FaIlMinter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-15 Identified Program Needs In terms of training new hires or recruitment of new employees (Exhibit 4-14), among those familiar with respective operations, the Career and Technology Center received the highest overall favorability rating (81 percent) by a slight margin over Southeast Missouri's main campus (76 percent). Half of respondents indicated a favorable opinion of Three Rivers Community College at Sikeston (50 percent) and Shawnee Community College (50 percent). Southern Illinois University at Carbondale received the lowest proportion of favorable ratings (18 percent), though the Perryville Area Higher Education Center rated only slightly better (22 percent). EXHIBIT 4-14 ASSESSMENT OF TRAINING PROVIDERS FOR CURRENT EMPLOYEES How well do the following institutions meet your needs for providing continuing education and training for current employees? ■ Familiarity (% of Respondents Assigning a Rating) ■ Favorability (% Responding "Very Well" or "Somewhat") Southeast Missouri State University - Main Campus Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center heast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing Perryville Area Higher Education Center 71.4% 75.6% 49.2% 80.6% 15.9% 40.0% M 22.2% Southeast Missouri State University -Sikeston No ".211, Campus 42.9% 25.4% Three Rivers Community College at Sikeston 50.0% ree Rivers Community College Main Campus19.0% (Poplar Bluff) IN33.3% .0% Mineral Area College Main Campus (Park Hills) Maim 33.3 19.0% Shawnee Community College 50.0% 17.5% Southern Illinois University - Carbondale 18.2% 1s.9% Other Provider 40.0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-16 Identified Program Needs 4.2.2 Employer Delivery Preferences Local employers were also asked about their preferred methods of course delivery; the results are shown in Exhibit 4-15. In terms of the desired delivery modes or formats, in - class, face-to-face instruction is greatly preferred by respondents (85 percent). The second most popular option was Internet or Web -based instruction (58 percent). Slightly smaller shares of respondents were receptive to satellite campuses or off -campus centers (38 percent), videoconferencing (29 percent), or video tapes (27 percent) as potential modes of delivery. EXHIBIT 4-15 PREFERRED DELIVERY METHODS What method of educational/training delivery is most appropriate for your employees? (Check all that apply.) Other (please specify) Video Tape/CD/DVD Instruction via the Internet/Web-based Instruction via interactive videoconferencing (two- way video) Instruction at a satellite or off -campus location In class, face-to-face instruction 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. 84.9% 100% MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-17 Identified Program Needs In terms of the preferred days of the week (Exhibit 4-16), about 44 percent of respondents expressed no preference. Among those who did express preferences, responses were generally spread throughout the week, besides Sundays, which was only selected by 6 percent of the sample. EXHIBIT 4-16 PREFERRED SCHEDULING: DAY OF WEEK For your employees, which days of the week are best for education programs? (Check all that apply.) No Preference Sunday Saturday Friday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Monday I 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 43.8% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-18 Identified Program Needs As depicted in Exhibit 4-17, night classes were the most popular format (36 percent) over several other potential scheduling options. Lunchtime classes were the least preferable (7 percent) among the categories offered. EXHIBIT 4-17 PREFERRED SCHEDULING: TIME OF DAY For your employees, what times of day are best for education programs? (Check all that apply.) No Preference Night Late afternoon/early evening Mid-afternoon Lunchtime Mid-morning Early Morning 27.4% 35.6% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. In terms of the frequency of scheduling (Exhibit 4-18), a slight majority of respondents indicated that classes meeting once a week are more desirable than other schedules (55 percent). The second largest contingent indicated no preference (25 percent). MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-19 Identified Program Needs EXHIBIT 4-18 PREFERRED FREQUENCY OF TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES For your employees, how often should education classes meet? (Check all that apply.) No Preference 24.7% Other 11.0% Every day 0.0% Several times per week 12.3% Once a week 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FallMinter 2008. 4.3 Summary of Findings 54.8% 50% 0% The data presented in this chapter from the student and employer surveys demonstrate several areas of apparent need for education and training services in the Cape Girardeau Area. Successive analyses presented in Chapter 5.0 compare these and other findings relative to the potential demand for such services with the findings regarding available programs in the area detailed in Chapter 3.0 in order to yield some conclusions regarding the gaps and barriers between available supply and respective demonstrations of demand. MGT of America, Inc. Page 4-20 5.0 IDENTIFIED PROGRAM NEEDS Throughout the study, the MGT team has sought to uncover the gaps and barriers to successful higher education opportunities for students in the Cape Girardeau area. This was done through on-site interviews and focus groups, off-site phone interviews with community members, and surveys of three constituent groups (employers, high school students and postsecondary education students. What follows is a summary of the issues presented throughout this process. 5.1 Perceptions of Gaps and Barriers Qualitative and quantitative data about community perceptions of the gaps and barriers to higher education were solicited through interviews and focus groups as well as hard copy and on-line student and employer surveys. 5.1.1 Interviews and Focus Groups with Community Stakeholders In on-site interviews and focus groups, as well as follow-up phone interviews with community members, the MGT review team solicited feedback about the perceived gaps and barriers to successful higher education opportunities for students in the Cape Girardeau area. ' Older/non-traditional students are often overwhelmed or intimidated by the number of younger students at Southeast. The one-on-one attention they can receive at the smaller schools and off campus centers is more appealing to them, particularly for those who aren't looking for "campus life". Course times and days of week scheduling at Southeast's main campus are often not conducive to work adults. ' The number of younger students at the CTC is also a potential barrier to some older students. Since secondary students are enrolled first in daytime courses, many classes are closed before adult learners can register. ' Driving/transportation issues are a problem for many students of all ages. Both time/distance and expense of gas are seen as impediments to pursuing education beyond the immediate local area. ' Many students in the Cape Girardeau area would be first generation college students and have very low expectations of their prospects for college entry or advancement. Parents often do not know the financial aid options available and tell their children that they cannot afford college. Without the support of family/friends many are overwhelmed by the entire higher education experience and hesitate to enter college at all, given the limited options in the area. Consequently, a local two-year school is perceived to be a much more comfortable place to start for many area residents. The community college "student -centered" atmosphere was viewed as a welcomed advantage for gaining any traction or helping with the transition for enrollments among the first -generation (but traditional -aged) student population segment. MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-1 Gaps and Barriers • Many parents (particularly stay-at-home moms) are unable or reluctant to pursue postsecondary educational opportunities due to the high cost of childcare. The Southeast Sikeston Center offers childcare, and it is heavily utilized and, subsequently, often overbooked. • Some employers felt that layoffs resulting from the economic downturn would lead to (or had already begun to) an emphasis on need for retraining of the skilled labor pool for jobs in more stable industries. (The researchers did encounter several current non-traditional age students who were pursuing a new degrees/career re-training with federal or state assistance provided to recently laid -off workers.) • Many believe that past and future job losses in the area will increase the number of non-traditional age individuals who seek higher education locally. However, the increased lack financial means to pursue college due to the economic downturn will be a foreboding barrier. 5.1.2 Hiph School Students Surveys This section presents similar insights and observations on this topic as provided by high school students through the written surveys of juniors and seniors. Several questions included in the surveys administered to local high school students queried perceptions regarding barriers to access or gaps in the training programs available. The majority of high school respondents express at least some interest in pursuing higher education opportunities locally (Exhibit 5-1). Nearly 20 percent indicate they are extremely interested (19.3 percent), while and additional 41.9 percent are somewhat interested in local educational opportunities. MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-2 Gaps and Barriers EXHIBIT 5-1 INTEREST IN PURSUING EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES LOCALLY (n=786) 3.4 ■ Extremely interested ■ Somewhat interested Notvery interested ■ Not at all interested ■ No Response Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, Fall/ Winter 2008. In order to further examine group responses by academic standing, student respondents were categorized based on their likely Southeast admission status, according to their self-reported ACT score and high school GPA. ' Those respondents who's self-reported ACT and GPA scores are certain to earn an admission to Southeast are less likely to be interested in remaining in the Cape Girardeau area to pursue higher education opportunities than their counterparts who's are not at all or somewhat unlikely to be admitted to Southeast. Fifty-five percent of students whose admission is certain are at least somewhat interested in remaining in the area, while this desire to remain local was much stronger among those with less likely Southeast admission status, ranging from 61.5 percent to 68.8 percent. ' Similarly, those with less promising prospects for Southeast admission are much more likely to be interested in earning an associate's degree as their highest degree than those with certain Southeast admission. Just 6.5 percent of students with certain Southeast admission are interest in finishing their education with an associate's degree, while between 15.2 and 25.5 percent of students with scores less likely to earn a Southeast admission felt the same. As shown in Exhibit 5-2, of the 278 students who indicated that they are not interested in local higher education opportunities, a desire to leave the area was the most frequently cited reason for the lack of interest (61.5 percent). Lack of program availability in the local area was mentioned by 39.6 percent of respondents, while the reputation of colleges/programs was cited by approximately 20 percent. MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-3 Gaps and Barriers EXHIBIT 5-2 REASONS FOR LACK OF INTEREST IN PURSUING EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES LOCALLY (n=278) Desire to leave the area Program not available in local area Reputation of colleges/programs Other Location not convenient Cost Lack of financial aid Do not qualify for admission Inconvenient scheduling 61. 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, Fall/Winter 2008. When asked to select a single, primary reason for their lack of interest, nearly half indicated a desire to leave the area (48.4 percent), while nearly 25 percent mentioned the lack of program availability (Exhibit 5-3). MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-4 39.6% 20.1% 13. % 6. % 5. % 2.9° 2.901 9° 61. 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, Fall/Winter 2008. When asked to select a single, primary reason for their lack of interest, nearly half indicated a desire to leave the area (48.4 percent), while nearly 25 percent mentioned the lack of program availability (Exhibit 5-3). MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-4 Gaps and Barriers EXHIBIT 5-3 PRIMARY REASON FOR LACK OF INTEREST IN PURSUING EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES LOCALLY (n=277) Desire to leave the area Program not available in local area Reputation of colleges/programs Other Cost Location not convenient Inconvenient scheduling Lack of financial aid availability Do not qualify for admission .4% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, FallMinter 2008. 5.1.3 Postsecondary Education Student Surveys Postsecondary students also provided input regarding barriers and gaps related to educational programs. As part of the postsecondary student surveys, this segment was also asked about barriers to access and/or gaps in available programming in the area. When asked about the likelihood that highest degree the plan to obtain would be from a provider in the Cape Girardeau area, over 30 percent indicated that they are extremely likely to obtain their highest degree from a local provider, while nearly 35 percent indicate that they are somewhat likely to do so (Exhibit 5-4). MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-5 4 4.9% 9.0% 7. o .0% 2. 1.8 0.7% .4% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, FallMinter 2008. 5.1.3 Postsecondary Education Student Surveys Postsecondary students also provided input regarding barriers and gaps related to educational programs. As part of the postsecondary student surveys, this segment was also asked about barriers to access and/or gaps in available programming in the area. When asked about the likelihood that highest degree the plan to obtain would be from a provider in the Cape Girardeau area, over 30 percent indicated that they are extremely likely to obtain their highest degree from a local provider, while nearly 35 percent indicate that they are somewhat likely to do so (Exhibit 5-4). MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-5 Gaps and Barriers EXHIBIT 5-4 HOW LIKELY IS IT THAT YOU WILL OBTAIN YOUR HIGHEST DEGREE FROM A PROVIDER IN THE CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA? (n=319) r 13.07% 30.04% 21.91% I Extremely likely Somewhat likely Not very likely Not at all likely M.000 �34.98% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, Fall/Winter 2008. ' Post secondary students were categorized based on age into traditional (under 25) and non-traditional (24 or younger) students to determine the effect of age on interest in pursuing higher education opportunities locally. Eighty-six percent of non-traditional age students are at least somewhat interested in pursuing local higher education, while 75 percent of traditional age students feel the same. Of the 99 students who indicated that they are not likely to obtain their highest degree locally, lack of program availability in the local area was the most frequently cited reason (47.5 percent). Inconvenient location was mentioned by 27.3 percent of respondents, while the desire to leave the area was cited by 26.3 percent (Exhibit 5-5). MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-6 Gaps and Barriers EXHIBIT 5-5 REASONS WHY NOT FOR THOSE WHO RESPONDED "NOT LIKELY" OR NOT VERY LIKELY" (n=99) Program not available in local area Location not convenient Desire to leave the area Cost Lack of financial aid Other Inconvenient scheduling Reputation of colleges/programs Do not qualify for admission 47. M 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, FaIUWinter 2008. When asked to select a single, primary reason why they would not be likely to seek their highest degree locally, the largest share of respondents indicated the lack of program availability (45.4 percent), while both a desire to leave the area and inconvenient location were cited by 15.5 percent of respondents (Exhibit 5-6). EXHIBIT 5-6 PRIMARY REASON WHY NOT FOR THOSE WHO RESPONDED "NOT LIKELY" OR NOT VERY LIKELY" (n=97) Program not available in local area Desire to leave the area Location not convenient Cost Other Reputation of colleges/programs Inconvenientscheduling Lack of financial aid availability 27.3% 26.3 16.2 .1% 8. 6.1% 6.1% 7.2 0 47. M 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, FaIUWinter 2008. When asked to select a single, primary reason why they would not be likely to seek their highest degree locally, the largest share of respondents indicated the lack of program availability (45.4 percent), while both a desire to leave the area and inconvenient location were cited by 15.5 percent of respondents (Exhibit 5-6). EXHIBIT 5-6 PRIMARY REASON WHY NOT FOR THOSE WHO RESPONDED "NOT LIKELY" OR NOT VERY LIKELY" (n=97) Program not available in local area Desire to leave the area Location not convenient Cost Other Reputation of colleges/programs Inconvenientscheduling Lack of financial aid availability 45.4 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, FaIlMinter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-7 15.5% 15.5 8. 7.2 0 .1% 3.1% 1.0% 45.4 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, FaIlMinter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-7 Gaps and Barriers 5.1.4 Employer Surveys Finally, local employers were also asked to provide insight into perceived barriers to access or gaps in provision regarding local educational opportunities. Employer respondents were asked about their perceptions of the quality of educational opportunities available locally. As depicted in Exhibit 5-7, Southeast Missouri State University was selected by the largest proportion of respondents for rating purposes (83%) and was rated the most favorably by these respondents (79%) in terms of the training provided to their current employees. Other providers receiving a majority of favorable ratings included the CTC (74% favorable), Three Rivers Community College Main Campus (61 %), Southeast Missouri's Sikeston campus (55%), and the Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing (50%), and Mineral Area College's Main Campus (50%). Alternately, the Perryville Higher Education Center received very few favorable ratings (11 %). MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-8 Gaps and Barriers EXHIBIT 5-7 ASSESSMENT OF TRAINING PROVIDERS FOR FUTURE HIRES (n=63) How well do the following institutions meet your needs when hiring qualified new employees? ■ Familiarity (% of Respondents Assigning a Rating) ■ Favorability (% Responding "Very Well" or "Somewhat") Southeast Missouri State University - Main 82.5% Campus 78.8% Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing Perryville Higher Education Center Southeast Missouri State University - Sikeston Campus Three Rivers Community College at Sikeston Three Rivers Community College Main Campus (Poplar Bluff) Mineral Area College Main Campus (Park Hills) Shawnee Community College 55.6% 74.3% 12.7 immm 50.0% 14.3% 11.1% zz.2% 50.0% 20.6 46.2% W"2.6 Southern Illinois University - Carbondale 38.5 15.9% Other Provider 50.0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FaIIANinter 2008. Note: Familiarity calculated as the number of respondents assigning a rating to the institution (versus the percentage not submitting a response for the particular institution or responses of "n/a") as a proportion of the total respondents submitting data for the relevant section of the survey. Favorability calculated as the proportion of those assigning a rating that the institution either met needs "somewhat" or "very well" (versus "not very" or "not at all") among those assigning any rating to the institution (per the previously outlined familiarity tabulation). MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-9 Gaps and Barriers In a summary query of other perceived education and training needs in the area, notable findings included: ■ About 32 percent of respondents indicated that there were "particular groups or segments of the local population [that they felt did] not have appropriate access to postsecondary education." ■ The majority of these respondents indicated that cost of attendance was the primary barrier to access for the groups that were cited. ■ A smaller segment of respondents indicated that particular types or formats of programming were not available in their respective areas. Exhibit 5-8 depicts the results of a query regarding the specific types of training programs and levels needed by responding organizations for their employees. Two particular programs were cited by more than one-fifth (20%) of respondents: ■ 26 percent indicated needs for teacher education (elementary and secondary level). ■ 23 percent indicated needs for management -related training. Other programs cited by 10 percent or more of the respondent pool included: ■ Computer and information sciences (19%). ■ Marketing and sales (16%). ■ Special education (15%). ■ Accounting (14%). ■ Finance (12%). ■ Construction trades (12%). ■ Interpersonal skills or leadership training (11%) ■ Manufacturing or production related training (11 At least 45 other specific training or education programs were listed by respondents, indicating a broad array of needs among this sample of local employers. In terms of the level of educational programs that would be desired among respondents, graduate or professional programs were most frequently cited, followed closely by two year programs and certificate programs. Demand for bachelor's level programs lagged somewhat behind other levels. MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-10 Gaps and Barriers EXHIBIT 5-8 FIELDS/DISCIPLINES IN WHICH EMPLOYEES WILL NEED THE MOST TRAINING OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS TOP 10 RESPONSES (n=73) Teacher Education (Elementary/Secondary) Management (General) Computer & Information Sciences Marketing & Sales Special Education Accounting Construction Trades (Carpentry, Welding, etc.) Finance Manufacturing/Production Interpersonal Skills/Leadership 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. 5.2 Cost of Attendance As discussed in previous sections, cost of attendance was perceived as one specific barrier to access by many constituents that provided input into this study. Tuition rates for area institutions were presented in chapter 3. Exhibit 5-9 displays the difference in tuition costs between the Southeast main campus (the most costly public option for undergraduate lower division coursework) and other alternatives operating in the region and local area. Students enrolled at Southeast's main campus pay a rate of $208.50 per credit hour in tuition ($625.50 for a single three credit course). The alternative educational options currently available to students in the area are less expensive, ranging from $300.00 to $397.50 per three -credit course resulting in potential savings from $264.00 - $325.50 when compared to the Southeast main campus rate. These less costly alternatives include Southeast's off -campus locations. For example, local students will pay $228.00 less for a three credit course taken at a Southeast off -campus center than they will at the main campus. A student taking a MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-11 26.0% 213% 9.2% 16.4° 15.1% 3.7% % 12.11% 12. 11.0% 11.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. 5.2 Cost of Attendance As discussed in previous sections, cost of attendance was perceived as one specific barrier to access by many constituents that provided input into this study. Tuition rates for area institutions were presented in chapter 3. Exhibit 5-9 displays the difference in tuition costs between the Southeast main campus (the most costly public option for undergraduate lower division coursework) and other alternatives operating in the region and local area. Students enrolled at Southeast's main campus pay a rate of $208.50 per credit hour in tuition ($625.50 for a single three credit course). The alternative educational options currently available to students in the area are less expensive, ranging from $300.00 to $397.50 per three -credit course resulting in potential savings from $264.00 - $325.50 when compared to the Southeast main campus rate. These less costly alternatives include Southeast's off -campus locations. For example, local students will pay $228.00 less for a three credit course taken at a Southeast off -campus center than they will at the main campus. A student taking a MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-11 Gaps and Barriers three -credit course at the Three Rivers -Sikeston Center pays $264 less, while those enrolled in a Mineral Area College course at the Perryville Higher Education Center pay $301.50 less than they would at the Southeast main campus. Finally, students who choose to attend Shawnee Community College in Illinois are charged $325.50 less for their three credit course than they would be at Southeast's main campus. If in -district rates for either Mineral Area College or Three Rivers Community College were available locally, students would realize an even more dramatic savings per course or semester when compared to tuition rates charged at the Southeast main campus. The in -district rates for a three credit course at these institutions are $376.50 and $384.00 less (respectively) than Southeast. There would be savings of $75.00 per three credit hour course at either MAC or TRCC if "in -district" vs. "out -of district" rates were available locally for those colleges. Although the A+ program and other Federal or state grant or loan programs may be available to prospective students, not all qualify or consider these financial aid options when making college attendance decisions. The tuition rate data confirm the perceptions of local constituents that the cost of attendance may constitute a significant barrier to some prospective students from the Cape Girardeau area. EXHIBIT 5-9 TUITION RATE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SOUTHEAST MAIN CAMPUS AND OTHER AREA INSTITUTIONS Source: Institutional Web site and administrative confirmation. MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-12 Cost/Credit Hr Tuition 3 -hr course Savings per 3 -Hr Course at Alternatives Southeast Missouri State University - Main Campus $208.50 $625.50 na Current Alternatives Southeast Missouri State University - Off Campus Centers $132.50 $397.50 $228.00 Career and Technology Center - Mineral Area $108.00 $324.00 $301.50 Mineral Area College, Out -of -District $108.00 $324.00 $301.50 Three Rivers Community College, Out -of -District $120.50 $361.50 $264.00 Shawnee Community College - MO resident $100.00 $300.00 $325.50 In -District Rates (Not available locally) Mineral Area College, In -District $83.00 $249.00 $376.50 Three Rivers Community College, In -District $80.50 $241.50 $384.00 Source: Institutional Web site and administrative confirmation. MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-12 Gaps and Barriers 5.3 Key Underserved Segments Stakeholders throughout the community recognize that there are significant barriers to the pursuit of higher education for many local residents. Consequently, the MGT team has identified the following key underserved segments of the Cape Girardeau area population: ■ First generation college students (expectations) ■ Under -prepared high school graduates ■ Non-traditional age students (especially working adults) ■ Residents with transportation issues (place -bound, time -bound) ■ Individuals and families for whom the cost of attendance is unmanageable MGT of America, Inc. Page 5-13 6.0 PROGRAM A CCESS OPTIONS 6.0 PROGRAM ACCESS OPTIONS This chapter provides descriptions of possible options for the expansion of higher education opportunities in the Cape Girardeau area. Student preferences and interest levels for three of the options are presented. Finally, we outline some of the perceived advantages and disadvantages that might be associated with each option. 6.1 Description of Possible Local Options The following five options or alternatives to address the identified need for more access to two-year degree programs in the local area surrounding Cape Girardeau are offered for consideration by the Coalition Task Force. Each option has apparent advantages and disadvantages from the perspectives of different audiences and stakeholders, including the local business community, local and regional education leaders, area residents, taxpayers, students, prospective students, and the State. A number of approval processes and procedures must be followed if any one of these options is to become a reality. None could be initiated immediately, and some may take years before the first student would occupy a seat in a classroom. Some existing state regulations or restrictions may slow or impede initiation of several models at the present time. Simultaneously, competitive forces, both in-state and out-of-state, vying for local students and enrollments should also be of concern in reaching operational capacity of the options. Finally, the continued decline of national and state economic conditions adds tremendous pressure against the expansion or creation of new public sector educational entities in the immediate future. 6.1.1 Collaborative Multi -Provider Model The collaborative multi -provider model option would more closely resemble a residence center as currently defined by the Coordinating Board for Higher Education (CBHE) guidelines. However, it might operate with multiple institutions engaged in independently providing needed programs and related services at all degree levels at a local site. Out - of -area and local institutions (public and private alike) could provide general education and discipline specific terminal and transfer programs. A site and facility would need to be identified for this option. Ownership and governance arrangements must be determined. There are a number of state requirements and processes that must be adhered to before such an option could be approved and implemented. This option could be enhanced by providing more student support services and including more providers than currently exist at sites like the CTC, Perryville Area Higher Education Center, TRCC Sikeston and Southeast Missouri's Sikeston Center. A cooperative effort from all parties involved (including Southeast Missouri State) would be needed to successfully meet local needs through this option. 6.1.2 Expanded Services of Existin_p Community Colleges A second option is to open an off -campus center associated with one or more nearby community colleges in Cape Girardeau. This option would be initiated by the existing community colleges in cooperation with the local communities and the school districts to be served. Ideally, it would begin operation with one or more buildings for academic and support space. The institutions could identify existing land and space to lease or buy. MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-1 Program Access Options This option may require local officials and the state to obtain property of an appropriate size and location to meet short-term/immediate demand, but with long-term needs of a new operation focusing on two-year degree programming in mind as well. Depending on the institutions involved, modifications to the current statewide community college service area designations encompassing the school districts to be served may be required. In any event, the expanded community college option will initially be outside college taxing districts, and therefore would charge out -of -district tuition rates to local residents. If the local area is to be annexed into the current taxing district of a college, a number of state and CBHE processes and procedures must be followed, including a voter referendum. This option is envisioned to be a more full-service off -campus community college site and not a limited service residence center. Programming and delivery options could be flexible, but would allow students to complete degrees without physically attending courses at the home campuses. It is unknown at this time which Missouri community colleges would be most willing and appropriate for this option. There may be some additional CBHE hurdles that need to be negotiated as the county targeted for this center is home to Southeast Missouri State University. 6.1.3 Convert Cape Girardeau Career and Techno/opy Center to New Community College The CTC conversion option would create a new community college, but the facility and infrastructure are already in place and currently deliver postsecondary education. The existing buildings and property are owned by the Cape Girardeau School District and any re -designation or transfer of land or buildings must be carefully planned and follow all state and local requirements, regulations, procedures, and covenants. It is unknown at this time if the existing buildings and current configurations would best meet the needs of a new full-service community college, but they were designed and constructed for educational purposes. The state review and approval processes for a new college must be followed. It would entail the establishment of a new taxing district (one or more contiguous school districts) which requires voter approval. Needs must be clearly documented, and duplication, access, quality, and efficient use of public resources must be considered. A minimum threshold of 1,000 FTE must be projected within 5 years of initial operation. This option would require local officials and the state to obtain property of an appropriate size to meet long-term needs of a new college. This may entail start- up in an existing facility or constructing new buildings. The proposal must provide a feasibility study to determine projected revenues, start-up, capital, and operating expenses, and assess the overall financial viability of the proposed new entity. CBHE approval is required at various stages of the proposal process. If voter approval is obtained, then the proposed new institution must prepare and submit an academic program plan for CBHE approval prior to enrolling the first student. It is also not clear at this time if the high school curriculum currently offered at the CTC would or could remain intact and be compatible with a full community college focus and mission, though there are models for such a dual operation in Missouri. 6.1.4 New Community Colle_pe in Cape Girardeau The new community college option would entail the formation of a new public two-year institution located in Cape Girardeau County that would offer certificate, AAS, AS, and AA degree programs. It would develop its own curriculum and program offerings with appropriate articulation agreements to allow smooth transfer to Southeast Missouri State or other four-year public institutions across the state. The State and the CBHE have MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-2 Program Access Options established very detailed procedures and processes for application, documentation, review, and approval for new community colleges. By law, the local community and the school districts involved must initiate the proposal for a new college (as described in Option 2). This approach would also require identification and acquisition of property or existing facilities, staffing, and independent accreditation from the appropriate organizations and agencies. All of the aforementioned activities and processes will require considerable time and resources prior to enrolling the first student. Typically, that time frame often runs five or more years from initiation of proposal to seating an opening day class. This scenario would also require considerable cooperation from all current active public postsecondary education providers servicing the area, as each has a locally vested interest at some level. It is not unrealistic to anticipate that under this alternative, each existing provider may experience some negative impact on undergraduate lower division enrollments during initial years of operation or, in several instances, would leave the area completely. 6.1.5 Community College Division within Southeast Missouri State University The final option to consider may not be as common to Missouri as other options proposed here, but has been utilized in other states. It entails the existing local four-year public institution, Southeast Missouri State, establishing a community college division as a separate unit of the University. It would have different admission standards (open enrollment) and would undergo separate accreditations by the appropriate regional and programmatic organizations. The University would provide back-office administrative and operational support, as it does to all current divisions and off -campus centers now in existence. The institution would also be responsible for allocating appropriate space and facilities for the community college unit to fully operate either on -campus or at a selected nearby location (within Cape Girardeau County). The University could choose to offer various two-year degree programs of interest as well as collaborate with other providers for specialty programs beyond its current offerings. 6.2 Option Preferences (By Student Group) In order to gauge opinions about several of the most discussed options, as part of the student survey process, respondents were asked about their level of interest in three of the possible options described above. Students were asked how likely they would be to begin their college experience at a local community college if: ■ Programs were offered in the county through an existing, nearby community college; ■ The Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center was converted to a community college; or ■ Programs were offered through a newly established community college. MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-3 Program Access Options 6.2.1 Overall Interest in Community College Options High school student responses to these questions are shown in Exhibit 6-1. Approximately half of all high school respondents are at least somewhat likely to consider a local community college. A newly established community college is the most popular option (49.9 percent indicate that they are very likely or somewhat likely to consider this option) with slightly less (48.9 percent) indicating that they would consider an existing nearby community college. A CTC conversion to a community college was the least popular of the three options presented (44.2 percent). EXHIBIT 6-1 HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT INTEREST LEVEL IN LOCAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE OPTIONS If programs were offered through a newly established community college in the county? (n=663) If the Cape Girardeau Career and Technical Center was converted to a community college? (n=663) If programs were offered in the county through an existing nearby community college? (n=663) 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, Fall/Winter 2008. I would not consider this option Postsecondary student replies to these questions are shown in Exhibit 6-2. Current postsecondary respondents show more interest in the local community college options than high school students. More than half of these respondents are at least somewhat likely to consider a local community college. A newly established community college is, again, the most popular option (69.2 percent indicate that they are very likely or somewhat likely to consider this option) with 66.2 percent indicating that they would consider an existing nearby community college. As with the high school student group, a CTC conversion to a community college was the least popular of the three options presented (58.4 percent). Utilizing an existing nearby community college was particularly favored by this group (41.6 percent) if only the "very likely interested" responses were compared across the three options. MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-4 Program Access Options EXHIBIT 6-2 POSTSECONDARY STUDENT INTEREST LEVEL IN LOCAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE OPTIONS ■ Very likely If programs were offered through a newly established community college in 28.5% 37.7%11.3% ■ the county? (n=302) Somewhat likely Ifthe Cape Girardeau Career and IF Technology Center was converted to a Somewhat community college? (n=303) unlikely If programs were offered in the county ■ Very unlikely through an existing nearby community college? (n=305), ,r Iwould not 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% consider this option Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, Fall/Winter 2008. 6.2.2 Interest in Community Co//e_ge Options by Likely Southeast Admission Status In order to further examine group responses by academic standing, student respondents were categorized based on their likely admission status to Southeast Missouri State, according to their self-reported ACT score and high school GPA. High school student responses to each question by likely Southeast admission status are shown in Exhibits 6-3 through 6-5. Those high school respondents whose self-reported ACT and GPA scores meet or exceed admission qualifying standards at Southeast are less likely to be interested in any of the three community college options than members of every other qualifying category. The CTC conversion to a community college is the least interesting option for all respondents; the existing community college option and newly established community college are about equal in their interest level among students: ■ Existing community college — The sum of "very likely" and "somewhat likely" responses among those certain to be accepted at Southeast is 31.5 percent, while the sum for all other categories of student is between 47.7 and 63.0 percent, as shown in Exhibit 6-3. ■ CTC conversion — The sum of "very likely" and "somewhat likely" responses among those certain to be accepted at Southeast is 29.5 percent, while the sum for all other categories of student is between 43.3 and 58.2 percent, as shown in Exhibit 6-4. ■ New community college — The sum of "very likely" and "somewhat likely" responses among those certain to be accepted at Southeast is 35.5 percent, while the sum for all other categories of student is between 50.5 and 60.3 percent, as shown in Exhibit 6-5. MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-5 Program Access Options EXHIBIT 6-3 HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT INTEREST LEVEL IN EXISTING COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=154) No Southeast Acceptance (n=44) Possible Southeast Acceptance (n=187) Marginal Southeast Acceptance (n=73) Certain Southeast Acceptance (n=200) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, FalUWinter 2008. ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely • I would not consider this option MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-6 Program Access Options EXHIBIT 6-4 HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT INTEREST LEVEL IN CTC CONVERSION TO A COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=153) No Southeast Acceptance (n=46) Possible Southeast Acceptance (n=187) Marginal Southeast Acceptance (n=73) Certain Southeast Acceptance (n=200) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, Fall/Winter 2008. EXHIBIT 6-5 HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT INTEREST LEVEL IN NEWLY ESTABLISHED COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=156) No Southeast Acceptance (n=46) Possible Southeast Acceptance (n=188) Marginal Southeast Acceptance (n=72) Certain Southeast Acceptance (n=200) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% I would not consider this option ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely ■ I would not consider this option Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area high school students, Fall/Winter 2008. Postsecondary student responses to each question by likely Southeast admission status are shown in Exhibits 6-6 through 6-8. MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-7 Program Access Options As with high school respondents, the postsecondary students whose self-reported ACT and GPA scores met or exceeded admission requirements at Southeast are less likely to be interested in any of the three community college options than members of every other category. The CTC conversion to a community college is, again, the least interesting option for all respondents. The existing community college option and newly established community college are about equal in their interest level among students: ■ Existing community college — The sum of "very likely" and "somewhat likely" responses among those certain to be accepted at Southeast is 60.9 percent, while the sum for all other categories of student is between 71.7 and 76.2 percent, as shown in Exhibit 6-6. ■ CTC conversion — The sum of "very likely" and "somewhat likely" responses among those certain to be accepted at Southeast is 47.2 percent, while the sum for all other categories of student is between 65.5 and 69.4 percent, as shown in Exhibit 6-7. ■ New community college — The sum of "very likely" and "somewhat likely" responses among those certain to be accepted at Southeast is 56.7 percent, while the sum for all other categories of student is between 71.7 and 76.9 percent, as shown in Exhibit 6-8. EXHIBIT 6-6 POSTSECONDARY STUDENT INTEREST LEVEL IN EXISTING COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=46) ■Very likely No Southeast Acceptance •, ■Somewhat (n=21) likely Possible Southeast ' Somewhat Acceptance (n=56) unlikely J � Marginal Southeast ■ Very Acceptance (n=49) unlikely Certain Southeast ■ Iwould not consider Acceptance (n=128) _,r rfir this option 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-8 Program Access Options EXHIBIT 6-7 POSTSECONDARY STUDENT INTEREST LEVEL IN CTC CONVERSION TO A COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=46) No Southeast Acceptance (n=27) Possible Southeast Acceptance (n=55) Marginal Southeast Acceptance (n=49) Certain Southeast Acceptance (n=127) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■Very unlikely I I would not consider this option Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, Fall/Winter 2008. EXHIBIT 6-8 POSTSECONDARY STUDENT INTEREST LEVEL IN NEWLY ESTABLISHED COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=46) No Southeast Acceptance (n=26) Possible Southeast Acceptance (n=54) Marginal Southeast Acceptance (n=49) Certain Southeast Acceptance (n=127) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■Very unlikely ■Iwould not consider this option Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area postsecondary students, Fall/Winter 2008. Examination of preferences for these three possible options to expand local access to two-year degree programs is quite revealing. Across (self-reported) admissions acceptance levels, area students that have achieved or exceeded minimum MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-9 Program Access Options requirements for enrollment at Southeast Missouri State are less likely than others to consider a local community college option. This trending opinion may be most important to the University, as it is extremely concerned about any adverse impacts on the university with the introduction of a local community college. 6.3 Potential Advanta_qes and Disadvantages of Each Option Facts, requirements, issues, and potential plans associated with each of the possible options described in preceding sections of this chapter can be viewed from a variety of perspectives among all interested parties and stakeholders, as well as prospective students. What may, on the surface, appear to be an advantage (or at worst a non -issue to some) might be perceived as a significant disadvantage or barrier to others. Additionally, though the above descriptions have attempted to convey a basic outline and vision of the initial concept and processes that might be expected with the implementation of each option, even minor alterations to one or more components of an option could dramatically change the desirability or practicality of that approach for Cape Girardeau. For example, if land were donated for a new facility or very favorable lease terms were made available for an existing building, this may significantly change the perception of a particular option. By way of the following summary, the needs assessment study team offers one perspective on each of the five options. We are certain that other advantages and disadvantages for each option may be brought forth by Coalition members, other interested parties, and stakeholders as the discussion and debate progresses. Our opinions expressed in the following sections are based on information and input gathered and analyzed during the course of this study. They reflect our perspectives on the situation, the perceived needs and gaps regarding local postsecondary access, and offer an independent view concerning the five options proposed at this time. We acknowledge that others may not fully agree with our viewpoints and conclusions. MGT identified eight factors on which to examine the proposed options for addressing the most significant postsecondary educational need in the Cape Girardeau area (two- year programs and degrees). These factors are most common when selecting and developing access to educational opportunities that may require additional or expanded facilities. These factors include: ■ Site Characteristics. ■ Facilities. ■ Programs to be Offered. ■ Services to be Offered. ■ Transfer of Credits. ■ Control/Governance (Ownership). ■ Regulatory/Approval Processes. ■ Accreditation. ■ Costs (start-up and operating). A summary matrix (Exhibit 6-9) of the five options across these factors or descriptors may help to clarify how each option is envisioned for purposes of determining the advantages, disadvantages, strengths, and weaknesses applicable for the situation in Cape Girardeau. MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-10 Program Access Options EXHIBIT 6-9 SUMMARY OF OPTIONS BY KEY DESCRIPTORS MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-11 Five Options to Expand Local Access to Higher Education Descriptors Expanded Services of Community College Multi -Provider Model Existing Community Convert CTC New Community College within Southeast Colleges Missouri State Local site would be Local site would be Local site would be Site provided by Site Characteristics leased leased/purchased Use current location purchased University Assign space &utilize Facilities Lease existing building Lease building(s) Use current facility New buildings current classrooms Add general ed, expand Develop technical ed and Programs Offered Programs as needed by Duplicate selected main tech ed (retain high general ed courses and Current undergraduate best provider campus programming school programs) programs lower division curriculum Services Offered Limited shared services Selected Services on-site Full service Full service Current Services Case by case basis per Main campus transfer New transfer New transfer Internal, but requires Transferability of Credit program and provider agreements agreements agreements separate accreditation Under existing Under existing New accreditation New accreditation Possible separate Accreditation institutional institutional required required accreditation required accreditation accreditation Control/Governance New joint governing Existing College Board New Community College New Community College Existing Southeast Board board among providers board board Individual provider Community College School District, local Local taxpayers and Southeast Board, CBHE, Approval Process admin, CBHE board and CBHE taxpayers, CBHE CBHE approval possible new legislation Shared local and College start-up and Conversion costs/ Substantial capital costs, Some additional Costs provider costs operating costs operating costs operating costs University costs MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-11 Program Access Options The advantages and disadvantages described in the Exhibit 6-10 are highly dependent on the description, interpretation, and implementation of the options. It would not be surprising to have widely varying opinions about each option on each factor from the parties involved. These are presented as conceptual models and the details and intricacies of each have not been examined, nor fully developed, at this time. They merely reflect the ideas and observations of the research team from information collected and observed on-site and prior experience and engagements at other locations across the country. They are presented as a frame of reference only for the Coalition to consider. EXHIBIT 6-10 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF PROPOSED OPTIONS Options Requirements Perceived Advantages Perceived Disadvantages Lease existing facility, smaller scale start-up, Similar to residence center model, State/CBHE review and approval processes, moderate time to open, shared cost fluctuations in program offerings possible, Option #1 -Collaborative cooperation of Southeast Missouri State as burden, multiple provider participation, differing cost of attendance (tuition) rates, Multi -Provider Model home campus in Cape Girardeau County, flexible programming as needed, credit transfer issues may develop, need to and approvals of provider institutions governance structure and administrative identifyand retain providers, and negotiate Boards. model as desired, less costly than new program responsibilities of each. pr college start-up. Less costly than new college, identify and Priorities and responsibilities still to main lease site/facility quickly, governance and campus, may need to alter service area administration responsibility of main designations, fluctuation in program Option #2 - Expanded Same as Option #1, plus may require campus, programming related to main offerings, less services than on main Services of Existing establishment of a taxing district if in- campus strengths, time to open sooner campus, may not be permanent Community Colleges district funding and tuition are needed. than new college, support and commitment, tuition and fees set by administrative services from main campus, Colleges, governance issues if more than systems already in place, cost burden on one college involved, may not be able to colleges, transfer agreements established. complete a full degree on-site. Rigorous State/CBHE review and approval Less costly than new college with new processes, initiation of proposal from local facilities, time to open sooner than new Time to open 2-3 years out, cost burden on school districts, transfer or release of college, infrastructure and facilities community, potential displacement high Option #3 - Conversion existing CTC property and facilities, creation configuration ready to go, known and a school enrollment at CTC, must develop of CTC to Community of a new CC taxing district and voter accessible location, under local control and own programs and services, identify and College approval, cooperation of Southeast governance, no competing interests or retain appropriate faculty and instructors, Missouri State as home campus in Cape priorities at other locations can set own must develop transfer agreements. Girardeau County, and independent tuition rates, some faculty and staff readily accreditation. available. Offers "fresh start" from historical Most costly option, longest time to open alternatives and options, able to develop minimum 5 years, must acquire site and Option #4 - New All listed in Option #2 except transfer of and add programs as needed, local facilities, develop infrastructure, establish Community College school district property. governance and control, can set own tuition own Board, hire faculty and staff, develop rates , no priorities or responsibilities to own programs, transfer agreements, cost other locations, burden on community. Lower cost option, all infrastructure, If space not available on campus, then support and administrative services added costs, on -campus location may not provided by University, space allocation (if be conducive to some underserved Option #5 - Community State and CBHE review and approval, available on campus or near campus), Gen populations, Southeast would be College Division at approval of Southeast Missouri State Board, Ed and lower division transfer programming responsible for program selection, may Southeast Missouri State possible separate accreditation. already in place and accredited, "open limit other provider participation, CC enrollment' possible, set own tuition for CC Division would compete with other units for division, minimize transfer credit University resources and priorities, may difficulties, full cost burden on University. require separate accreditation. MGT of America, Inc. Page 6-12 7.0 NEEDS ASSESSMENT CONCLUSIONS 7.0 NEEDS ASSESSMENT CONCLUSIONS This chapter builds on the previous analyses to provide further guidance to the various stakeholders in postsecondary education in the Cape Girardeau area regarding prospective demand for programs as well as advantages and disadvantages of assorted approaches to filling unmet needs and, otherwise, removing barriers to access. Included are sections addressing: ■ Key observations revealed through MGT's interviews, surveys, and other data collection efforts. ■ Estimates of demand pursuant to guidelines established by the Missouri Department of Higher Education for the establishment of new community colleges or postsecondary education centers. ■ Alternate estimates of demand relying on other data to assess potential enrollment levels. ■ Comparisons between potential need and interests for programming by level and currently available inventories by local postsecondary providers. ■ Suggestions for successive efforts relating to the delivery option review and evaluation process. 7.1 Key Observations Some of the most pertinent findings discovered through MGT's research include: ■ Cape Girardeau County and the immediate market area (as defined by the study parameters) have a number of postsecondary education providers with main campus or off -campus operations located within. ■ Population growth since year 2000 has slowed in the market as compared to the previous decade. There has been a slight decline in the 25-44 year old age cohort, a primary segment for non-traditional age students. ■ Though local educational attainment at the baccalaureate and above level remains competitive, there is a gap at the two-year degree completion level. ■ High school graduation numbers are steady, while college participation is comparable to statewide rates, but falls below similar areas that host major public universities elsewhere in the state. ■ Southeast Missouri State University has a regional mission and scope, is moderately selective, and is expanding its entering undergraduate enrollment base beyond the local area. This past Fall semester realized the largest enrollment and freshmen class in its history. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-1 Needs Assessment Conclusions ■ At some point in the future, enrollment and capacity will converge at Southeast Missouri State University and the institution will face difficult decisions on how to accommodate new freshmen and undergraduate enrollment demand. ■ Across the country, as well as in Missouri, the current economic uncertainty has contributed to an influx of college enrollments at all levels, in many instances, far greater than anticipated. How long this increased wave of enrollment demand will last, is yet to be determined. ■ Recent fiscal constraints and budget cutbacks have curtailed a number of capacity building initiatives for all public higher education institutions in Missouri, including Southeast Missouri State and local community colleges. ■ As admission to Southeast Missouri State University becomes more competitive, and more out -of -area prospects seek to enroll at the University, local residents and high school graduates who are not fully qualified or who are less competitive academically may not be able to gain immediate entry. ■ Over the years, Southeast Missouri State University has developed a network of off -campus sites in surrounding locations to better meet the academic course/program needs. Most are an appreciable distance away from Cape Girardeau. Locally, they do offer limited undergraduate programming at the Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center in conjunction with Mineral Area College. ■ Though Cape Girardeau County is not located within a community college taxing district, it is part of the Three Rivers Community College voluntary service area designated by the State in 1993. Three Rivers Community College does not now offer programs within the county, but does have an off - campus center in Sikeston, approximately 30 miles to the south. ■ Both Mineral Area College and Three Rivers Community College have in the past (and continue to) provided selected courses and programs in the local or surrounding area, outside of their own taxing districts. In some cases that has raised questions or concerns about their pending responsibilities and continued priorities to the residents that fund each college. Affordability of college continues to be a critical issue for all parties involved across Missouri. That is especially true of local parents, currently enrolled students, and all who wish to pursue some level of postsecondary education in the area. Many more students at all ages must work to pay for college. Both parents and students are often financial strapped during and after their academic pursuit, and the economy worsens. College selection and the decision to attend college at all are more likely to revolve around financial issues than ever before. Many students are choosing to begin their college careers at a community college with aspirations of transferring to a four-year institution later. ■ The Cape Girardeau area has experienced its share of job losses and business "belt -tightening" in recent months, which in turn have had various MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-2 Needs Assessment Conclusions impacts on the local education arena. In some ways it may increase local demand, yet cost of attendance becomes an even greater obstacle. The A+ Scholarship program administered by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education has been a tremendous asset to qualified high school students wishing to pursue college programs at two-year public institutions, but currently not all high schools participate, and those monies are not available to students who attend a four-year college or university. The Governor and State leaders have suggested that this program be expanded to all high schools across the state, and possibly authorized for use at four-year public higher education institutions. ■ In interviews with local community leaders, employers, educators, residents and current and prospective students, several areas of concern surfaced. - The overall cost of seeking postsecondary education at the undergraduate level is a major factor in how, when and where to go, or if to go at all. - The lack of a full-service two-year public college option in the County offering an array of degree programs, both terminal and transfer is a problem. - The perceived short-term costs vs. rewards for obtaining a two-year versus a four-year degree, in lieu of the economic pressures and job prospects in the local area may make some hesitate to pursue additional levels of education. - There is a desire of non-traditional age students to seek more convenient and more compatible programs than are currently available locally. Our research team also encountered a strong division among community, education and business leaders as to which public higher education institution should play the most prominent role in providing local two-year undergraduate programming and services. In some instances, animosity may be so strong that it may hinder the adoption of long-term solutions that may best benefit residents, high school students and employees of Cape Girardeau County and the surrounding communities. Navigating the current puzzle of programs and services that are accessible in the local market through Southeast Missouri State University, Mineral Area College, Three Rivers Community College, the Career and Technology Center, and various off -campus center sites is not easy or transparent to students, and in some ways may be a deterrent to the pursuit of their desired degree option and level of educational attainment. In particular, three problem areas were indicated: - Students attending a single site while taking courses from two different institutions have to pay each school's tuition and fees separately, may likely pay two different tuition rates, and may encounter problems with meeting financial aid criteria and approvals. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-3 Needs Assessment Conclusions - It is often difficult to get a required or desired sequence of courses for a particular major or track in a timely manner at a site, as courses do not always "make" or program offerings per term are frequently shuffled. - Though some degree programs can be completed solely at the local site, more often than not, degree completion will require a mixture of on-site and distance learning options as well as some work at the institution's main campus or full service off -campus center. If a high school student wishes to attend Southeast Missouri State University, yet does not fully qualify, they may be eligible to attend one of Southeast's off - campus centers (CTC, Sikeston, and Perryville). However, despite not being qualified, they must first submit an application to Southeast Missouri State, be rejected, and then opt to attend the off -campus center. They must a minimum of 9 -hours of specified coursework to improve their academic standing, and if successful, may re -apply and enter in a preceding term. Some perceive this process as a bit humiliating and unnecessary for high school students who know they cannot immediately get in, but still would like to attend the University. During our qualitative research efforts, a number of high school guidance counselors concurred that this is an actual deterrent to some of their students initially pursuing a baccalaureate degree program immediately after graduation. They feel a more comprehensive community college presence would make such a transition easier or at least an option for this group. Among older working adults seeking additional higher education, concerns about time and financial constraints are paramount. Therefore any marginal distance from home or work to a campus or center is a "deal breaker", except under certain circumstances. A number of these individuals also expressed less of a desire to attend Southeast Missouri State University main campus or the CTC due to the mix of high school students or traditional age undergraduates in the majority at each location. The assessment identified the following potentially underserved groups within the designated market area: ■ 1 st Generation College Students ■ Underprepared High School Graduates ■ Non -Traditional Age (working adults) ■ Students/Families with Financial Constraints ■ Students with Transportation Issues (time -bound, place -bound) ■ Displaced Workers It also pointed out a series of gaps or issues that may be obstacles or areas to overcome through increased access, especially at the two-year program level: ■ Local access to two-year transfer degree programs. ■ Technical training/certifications. ■ Ability to complete degrees locally. ■ Open access at the lower division level. ■ More support services for students at off -campus sites. ■ Convenience of course scheduling, especially for working adults. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-4 Needs Assessment Conclusions ■ Timely completion of programs to reach an education or degree goal quicker. ■ More affordable local options. 7.2 Estimates of Demand This section presents two methodologies for estimating demand for expanding access to community college programming in the Cape Girardeau area. The first complies with guidelines issued by the Missouri Department of Higher Education for the establishment of new community colleges or other postsecondary education centers using standards for participation against published estimates of population, while the second represents an attempt to gauge more specific interest with regard to programming and levels needed relying on additional portions of MGT's data collection efforts. The demand estimations specifically apply to the populations residing in the area consisting of Cape Girardeau County, Bollinger County, and the northern segments of Scott and Stoddard counties (as defined by school districts in Chapter 2.0). Therefore, these figures do not reflect the likely potential for in -migration of students from outlying areas that might also be expected to enroll in expanded community college -level programming. 7.2.1 Demand Estimates per Missouri Department of Higher Education Guidelines The Missouri Department of Higher Education's guidelines for establishing a new community college or other postsecondary education center involves substantiating a certain threshold of enrollments as a function of the area population. Specifically, the Department identifies a proportion of 2.5 percent of an area's total population as the approximate threshold of potential FTE enrollment levels from a given region. New community colleges or postsecondary centers are only authorized for regions that can demonstrate that this proportion will meet or exceed 1,000 individuals within a five-year time frame. The relevant population figures by school district (first presented in Chapter 2.0) are depicted below in Exhibit 7-1, including the proportion of each district's population that would count towards the 1,000 FTE threshold. Both the most recent estimates (2005) as well as the projections (2010) for the area appear to demonstrate sufficient population bases to satisfy the 1,000 FTE enrollment threshold, with upwards of 2,500 to 2,600 enrollments expected, according to this standard, for the respective periods. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-5 Needs Assessment Conclusions EXHIBIT 7-1 BASE FTE ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTS Source: Population estimates and projections per the Missouri Census Data Center. While this simple approach appears to satisfy the regulatory guidelines, consideration of several mitigating factors might be considered to yield more conservative estimates and, thereby, generate a more realistic expectation as to the potential number of students enrolling from this area. Foremost, the current number of students from local counties already enrolling in Southeast Missouri State University should be considered to deflate the total enrollment figure. As depicted in Exhibit 7-2, the enrollment levels at Southeast Missouri State originating from the relevant areas amount to nearly 2,000 FTE students, of which approximately 956 would be classified as lower division students (freshmen or sophomores). If we subtract these lower division students from the area's total estimated enrolled yield depicted previously (2,577 FTE students), we arrive at a net enrollment yield of about 1,622 FTE students. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-6 2005 2010 Population Est. FTE Population Est. FTE County School District Estimates 2.5% Projections 2.5% Bollinger Advance R -iv 304 8 307 8 Delta R -v 93 2 92 2 Jackson R -ii 29 1 29 1 Leopold R -iii 872 22 867 22 Woodland R -iv 5,998 150 6,048 151 Oak Ridge R -vi 10 0 11 0 Meadow Heights R -ii 3,418 85 3,673 92 Perry CO. 32 6 0 6 0 Zalma R -v 1,636 41 1,665 42 TOTAL 12,366 309 12,698 317 Cape Girardeau Advance R -iv 130 3 141 4 Cape Girardeau 63 35,354 884 36,641 916 Nell Holcomb R -iv 2,742 69 2,793 70 Delta R -v 2,159 54 2,271 57 Jackson R -ii 27,892 697 28,193 705 Oak Ridge R -vi 2,117 53 2,247 56 TOTAL 70,394 1,760 1 72,286 1,807 Scott Scott CO. R -iv 6,223 156 6,096 152 Scott City R -i 5,139 128 5,356 134 Kelso C-7 2,370 59 2,394 60 Oran R -iii 2,469 62 2,405 60 TOTAL 16,201 405 16,251 406 Stoddard Advance R -iv 2,515 63 2,439 61 Bell City R -ii 1,612 40 1,599 40 TOTAL 4,127 1 103 1 4,038 101 REGION TOTAL 103,088 1 2,577 1 105,273 2,632 Source: Population estimates and projections per the Missouri Census Data Center. While this simple approach appears to satisfy the regulatory guidelines, consideration of several mitigating factors might be considered to yield more conservative estimates and, thereby, generate a more realistic expectation as to the potential number of students enrolling from this area. Foremost, the current number of students from local counties already enrolling in Southeast Missouri State University should be considered to deflate the total enrollment figure. As depicted in Exhibit 7-2, the enrollment levels at Southeast Missouri State originating from the relevant areas amount to nearly 2,000 FTE students, of which approximately 956 would be classified as lower division students (freshmen or sophomores). If we subtract these lower division students from the area's total estimated enrolled yield depicted previously (2,577 FTE students), we arrive at a net enrollment yield of about 1,622 FTE students. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-6 Needs Assessment Conclusions EXHIBIT 7-2 SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE ENROLLMENTS AS PROPORTION OF CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA'S TOTAL PROSPECTIVE FTE ENROLLMENT YIELD, 2005 Region Southeast Missouri St. Headcount Enrollment Adjustment to FTE 1 Geographic Adjustment 2 Refined 2005 FTE Estimate Proportion of Lower Division Students 3 2005 Lower Division FTE Estimate Bollinger 178 150 100% 150 48% 72 Cape Girardeau 1,789 1,503 100% 1,503 48% 721 Scott 897 753 40% 301 48% 144 Stoddard 334 281 14% 39 48% 19 REGIONAL TOTAL 3,198 2,687 1 74.2% 1,993 1 48% 956 Source: 2005 enrollment totals per Southeast Missouri State University Fact Book, enrollments by county of origin. Population adjustments per Missouri Census Data Center total county and school district population estimates for 2005. 1. In 2005, the respective proportions of full-time and part-time undergraduates at Southeast Missouri State University were approximately 76% and 24% according to the institution's Fact Book. Therefore, if we estimate that part-time students account for approximately 1/3 (or 33%) of an FTE, on average, then total FTE enrollments can be estimated as: Full -Time FTEs [headcount enrollments x 76%] plus Part -Time FTEs [headcount enrollments x 24% x 33%]. 2. Enrollment totals prorated according to proportions of 2005 total county populations (Exhibit 2-3) encompassed by school districts (Exhibit 7-1). 3. Approximately 48% of Southeast Missouri's undergraduate enrollments were classified as lower division (freshmen or sophomores) in 2005. This estimate of approximately 1,600 FTE students is likely to be below the actual enrollment levels that could be realized if expanded access to local community college programs were to be offered. In addition to these students, it would be expected that a proportion of the students that previously opted to enroll at Southeast Missouri State University would instead opt to enroll in the expanded community college programs, due to preferences regarding affordability or other differences in the setting/environment of respective programs. Survey responses from current Southeast Missouri State lower division students revealed that approximately 44 percent might have opted to enroll in the expanded community college option to fulfill their lower division educational requirements.' When applied to the 956 FTE approximate for lower division enrollments from the local area, we estimate that the negative impact might amount to approximately 420 fewer FTE students enrolled at Southeast Missouri State University. Additionally, some students might be expected to migrate from outlying areas in order to enroll in the expanded community college level programs. Thus, this estimated 1 The proportion of Southeast Missouri State University students likely to enroll in a community college if access were expanded through various options was derived from the postsecondary student survey questions 22(a) through 22(c) (see Appendix D), specifically regarding those students currently enrolled at Southeast at the lower division level. An average response (across options) for the proportion of students that might enroll in a community college program was calculated as the sum of 80% of respondents indicating that they were "very likely" to pursue such an option plus 50% of those indicating that they were "somewhat likely" to pursue such an option, plus 10% of those indicating that they were "somewhat unlikely" to pursue such an option. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-7 Needs Assessment Conclusions enrollment level of approximately 1,600 FTE students might be viewed as a baseline (or minimum) for actual enrollment levels that might be realized. 7.2.2 Secondary Demand Estimates Based on Alternate Calculation An alternate, and potentially more accurate, approach to estimating the potential enrollment yield for the area is to consider the information brought forth by the assorted data collection efforts undertaken by MGT regarding the various student and employer populations, and respective needs, in the area. Such an approach would rely on two facets to yield the total expected enrollments for expanded community college programs offered in the area: ■ The number of traditional students, based on postsecondary plans of area high school graduates ■ The number of non-traditional students, consisting primarily of adult workers seeking upgrades to skills or retraining due to career displacement The first component of these estimates, traditional enrollments, relies on the number of high school graduates expected from local high schools, adjusted according to expressed preferences and plans for pursuit of postsecondary training options upon graduation. As depicted in Exhibit 7-3, the total enrollment yield from traditional student population might be expected to reach about 628 FTE students. The second component of enrollments in the expanded community college programs, referred to as nontraditional enrollments, consists primarily of working adult populations. This component of demand is derived from estimates of employment in the region and adjusted for national average participation rates among individuals aged 25 years and older (working adults), as depicted in Exhibit 7-4. The total numbers estimated for this segment amount to about 712 headcount students, which, when adjusted for national averages of full-time versus part-time proportions among the relevant age group, equates to about 358 FTE students. Joining the two analyses of traditional and nontraditional enrollments together, a combined total of about 986 FTE students might be expected for the expanded community college program option in the area per this historical data. It should be noted that conservative thresholds were used to derive these figures and therefore they also likely reflect a baseline estimate of potential enrollments. Further, any recent or future growth observed in the high school graduate population (via increases in graduation rates) or the working adult population would also influence this figure upwards. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-8 Needs Assessment Conclusions EXHIBIT 7-3 EXPECTED TRADITIONAL ENROLLMENT YIELD FROM CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA COUNTY High School Graduates 2007 Adj. for Plans Expressed in MGT Survey of HS Grads 1 Estimated Number of Local CC Enrollments Geographic Adjustment 2 Expected Headcount Enrollments Adjustment to FTE 3 Adjustment for 2.5 Years to Completion Bollinger 127 29.9% 38 100.0% 38 32 80 Cape Girardeau 645 29.9% 193 100.0% 193 162 405 Scott 441 29.9% 132 39.9% 53 44 110 Stoddard 362 29.9% 108 13.9% 15 13 33 REGIONAL TOTAL 1,575 29.9% 471 63.4% 299 251 628 Source: High school graduates per the Missouri Department of Education. 1. This proportion is derived from the figures depicted in Exhibit 6-1. Applied to the average responses across ALL potential options for expanded access to community college programs, the proportion of high school graduates expected to enroll in the expanded community college programming is estimated as the sum of: 80% of the proportion indicating they are "very likely" to pursue this option, plus 50% of the proportion indicating they are "somewhat likely" to pursue this option, plus 10% of the proportion indicating that they are "somewhat unlikely" to pursue this option. 2. Enrollment totals prorated according to proportions of 2005 total county populations (Exhibit 2-3) encompassed by school districts (Exhibit 7-1). 3. Based on responses depicted in Appendix B, Question 1A, the proportion of high school students expected to enroll full-time was 69%, while those expecting to enroll part-time was 18%, while the remaining 13 percent were unsure. Dividing these unsure results evenly between part-time and full-time, the total full-time/part- time ratio equates to 76% and 24%, respectively (which is, coincidentally, precisely even with the proportion of full-time/part-time enrollments at Southeast Missouri State in 2005). If we then estimate that part-time students account for approximately 1/3 (or 33%) of an FTE, on average, then total FTE enrollments can be estimated as: Full -Time FTEs [headcount enrollments x 76%] plus Part -Time FTEs [headcount enrollments x 24% x 33%]. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-9 Needs Assessment Conclusions EXHIBIT 7-4 EXPECTED NON-TRADITIONAL ENROLLMENT YIELD FROM CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA REGION Total Employment (2007 )(1) Geographic Adjustment Factor 2 Refined Geographic Employment Estimate 3 Two -Year College Particip. Rate 4 Estimated Two -Year Enrollment Level 5 Adjustment to FTE 6 Bollinger 1,813 100% 1,813 1.4% 25 13 Cape Girardeau 41,957 100% 41,957 1.4% 587 294 Scott 14,186 40% 5,674 1.4% 79 40 Stoddard 10,786 14% 1,510 1.4% 21 11 REGIONAL TOTAL 68,742 74% 50,954 1.4% 712 358 1. Total county employment (2007 annual average) per MERIC. 2. Proportions of 2005 total county populations (Exhibit 2-3) encompassed by school districts (Exhibit 7-1). 3. Prorated employment levels per geographic adjustment factors. 4. National average two-year college participation rate among individuals aged 25 years and over, per 2005 enrollment data published in Table 183 of the NCES Digest of Education Statistics (2007) and population estimates by age per the U.S. Census Bureau. 5. Headcount enrollments estimated based on employment levels and participation rates. 6. FTE enrollments estimated as 50% of headcount students per the 1:3 proportion of full-time versus part-time enrollments in two-year colleges among individuals aged 25 years and over (also per Table 183 of Digest of Education Statistics) and the assumption that part-time enrollments are equal to 1/3 of an FTE enrollment. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-10 Needs Assessment Conclusions 7.2.3 Estimates of Demand by Program This section presents a more detailed perspective of the training needs and expressed interests, respectively, of employers and students in the area. To estimate employer needs, we first validated projections of employment furnished by the Missouri Economic Research and Information Center (MERIC) against MGT's survey of local employers. For any demonstrated areas of need in our survey, we isolated projections of annual openings for specific occupational sectors from the MERIC 2004 through 2014 projections, and divided these by training and education requirements. Successively, we compared these areas of employer need against program inventories of local postsecondary providers, which is presented as Exhibit 7-5. The most readily available opportunities for targeted program expansion should exist wherever significant numbers of openings are apparent while gaps are apparent in relevant training programs. However, due to a lack of information regarding the locations of some programs (or components of programs) offered by Mineral Area College and Three Rivers Community College, some gaps may exist despite indications to the contrary in this table. If all or components of particular programs of high need are offered at the home campuses of either of these two providers but not at remote sites within the Cape Girardeau area, a gap could still exist. The most frequent areas of student interest are compared to the local provider inventories in Exhibit 7-6. These interest levels are divided between the results of our respective surveys of high school and current postsecondary students. Similar to the previous analysis regarding employer need, programs offered by Three Rivers Community College or Mineral Area College may not be available in their entirety (or at all) in the immediate Cape Girardeau area, so gaps in provision may exist despite indications to the contrary. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-11 Needs Assessment Conclusions EXHIBIT 7-5 COMPARISONS OF AREAS OF HIGH EMPLOYER NEED AGAINST AVAILABLE PROGRAMMING Source: Annual openings per MERIC projections of employment through 2014. Program inventories per institutional websites (depicted in Chapter 3.0). 1. Though Three Rivers Community College or Mineral Area College may offer related training, the program or components may not be available locally in the Cape Girardeau area. x - Indicates program is offered by institution in related discipline. ? - Indicates a general program area is available at the school but unclear whether specific training for particular discipline or level is offered. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-12 Available Programs d c o+ s= C d U N � Z OT O O N C � t 0 Ol y >_ U m � - o N y y o Z c y - E rn N U w w E o a y m U U Projected 'g ic m w Annual 'g i Q Openings v 0 v r � — Level of through Occupational Area Training Specific Jobs 2014 uo, u m xa Health f -Related Associate Registered Nurses 138 x ? ? Emergency Medical Technicians & Paramedics 15 x x x Licensed Practical & Licensed Vocational Nurses 44 x ? x Nursing Aides, Orderlies, & Attendants 113 x Respiratory Therapists 7 x x Medical & Clinical Laboratory Technicians 10 x Radiologic Technologists & Technicians 8 x x Surgical Technologists 6 x x Medical Records & Health Information Technicians 12 ? Medical Transcriptionists 5 Bachelor's Medical & Clinical Laboratory Technologists 7 x x Physician Assistants 7 Graduate Dentists, General 6 Pharmacists 6 Anesthesiologists 5 Family & General Practitioners 6 Skilled Trades Associate Computer, Automated Teller, & Office Machine Repairers 5 Aircraft Mechanics & Service Technicians 6 Automotive Service Technicians & Mechanics 38 x x x Bus & Truck Mechanics & Diesel Engine Specialists 16 ? x ? Mobile Heavy Equipment Mechanics, Except Engines 10 ? Managers Associate Funeral Directors 6 ? ? Bachelor's Chief Executives 17 x General & Operations Managers 45 x x x Sales Managers 6 x Financial Managers 5 x Medical & Health Services Managers 9 x IT -related Associate Computer Support Specialists 8 x x x x Bachelor's Network & Computer Systems Administrators 6 ? ? Education Associate Preschool Teachers, Except Special Education 26 ? Bachelor's Education Administrators, Elementary & Secondary School 7 x ? Graduate Teaching Assistants 7 x Elementary School Teachers, Except Special Education 43 x x x Middle School Teachers, Except Special & Vocational Education 12 x x Secondary School Teachers, Except Special & Vocational Education 49 x Special Education Teachers, Preschool, Kindergarten, & Elementary School 10 ? ? ? Special Education Teachers, Secondary School 10 ? ? ? Graduate Educational, Vocational, & School Counselors 8 x ? Education Teachers, Postsecondary 5 HR -Related Bachelor's Employment, Recruitment, & Placement Specialists 14 Training & Development Specialists 6 Sales/Marketing Bachelor's Insurance Sales Agents 24 Finance/Accounting Bachelor's Accountants & Auditors 28 x x x Personal Financial Advisors 6 x Loan Officers 7 x Engineering Bachelor's Industrial Engineers 8 Social Services Bachelor's Child, Family, & School Social Workers 19 x ? Medical & Public Health Social Workers 7 ? ? Graduate Rehabilitation Counselors 6 ? ? ? Mental Health & Substance Abuse Social Workers 6 ? ? ? Protective Services Bachelor's Probation Officers & Correctional Treatment Specialists 6 ? ? ? Source: Annual openings per MERIC projections of employment through 2014. Program inventories per institutional websites (depicted in Chapter 3.0). 1. Though Three Rivers Community College or Mineral Area College may offer related training, the program or components may not be available locally in the Cape Girardeau area. x - Indicates program is offered by institution in related discipline. ? - Indicates a general program area is available at the school but unclear whether specific training for particular discipline or level is offered. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-12 Needs Assessment Conclusions EXHIBIT 7-6 COMPARISONS OF HIGH STUDENT INTEREST AGAINST AVAILABLE PROGRAMMING Source: Student interest per MGT survey of high school and postsecondary students. Program inventories per institutional websites (depicted in Chapter 3.0). 1. Though Three Rivers Community College or Mineral Area College may offer related training, the program or components may not be available locally in the Cape Girardeau area. x - Indicates program is offered by institution in related discipline. ? - Indicates a general program area is available at the school but unclear whether specific training for particular discipline or level is offered. 7.3 Su-westions for Delivery Option Review and Evaluation In Chapter 6.0, the five potential options suggested for the Coalition's consideration were identified, described (as envisioned) in summary form, and the research team's perceptions of advantages and disadvantages were presented. The next step will be for the Coalition Task Force members to individually and collectively review, fully describe, discuss and evaluate each as to how it may meet local needs. Based on past needs assessment and delivery option planning that we have been associated with, we have identified typical criteria often used to evaluate potential program delivery and access options. The Coalition may have additional factors to add MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-13 Available Programs o 0 C o N y d > U v O U N d O m a N > _ y to y 2 N 7 m _ _ t EE 3 U 0 1 G O N R N_ = O U U `2 '6 N R N N > d Q % Interest 0 6 0 ° Among 5 ay c 5E 2 m Level Interest Area Students U) 0 tj N z Postsecondary Nursing 24.9% x x x Teacher Education (Elementary/Secondary) 8.2% x x x Accounting 4.5% x x x Management (General) 3.7% x x x Respiratory Therapy 3.7% x x x Sociology/Social Work 3.31 x x x Criminal Justice 2.9% x x x Dental Hygiene 2.9% x Pre -Med 2.4% x x x Psychology (General) 2.4% x x x Computer Information Sciences 2.0% x x x x High School Nursing 7.2% x x x x Pre -Med 5.1% x x x Teacher Education 4.5% x x x Physical Therapy 4.0% ? Mechanical Engineering 3.3% Management (General) 2.5% x x x Construction Trades ? ? ? --2.3% Criminal Justice 2.3 % x x x Animal/Veterinary Science 2.1 % x x Architechture 2.1 % ? Mechanics, Repairers and Technicians 2.1% x x x Source: Student interest per MGT survey of high school and postsecondary students. Program inventories per institutional websites (depicted in Chapter 3.0). 1. Though Three Rivers Community College or Mineral Area College may offer related training, the program or components may not be available locally in the Cape Girardeau area. x - Indicates program is offered by institution in related discipline. ? - Indicates a general program area is available at the school but unclear whether specific training for particular discipline or level is offered. 7.3 Su-westions for Delivery Option Review and Evaluation In Chapter 6.0, the five potential options suggested for the Coalition's consideration were identified, described (as envisioned) in summary form, and the research team's perceptions of advantages and disadvantages were presented. The next step will be for the Coalition Task Force members to individually and collectively review, fully describe, discuss and evaluate each as to how it may meet local needs. Based on past needs assessment and delivery option planning that we have been associated with, we have identified typical criteria often used to evaluate potential program delivery and access options. The Coalition may have additional factors to add MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-13 Needs Assessment Conclusions or revisions to ones already listed below. The Coalition should examine each option presented to determine its: ■ Responsiveness to Student Needs/Gaps, ■ Program & Services Strengths, ■ Impact on Community, ■ Cost of Attendance, ■ Time Required to be Operational, ■ Impact on Existing Institutions, ■ Start -Up Costs, ■ Operating Costs, ■ Governance & Control, ■ Ability to Meet Regulatory or Approval Processes. The Coalition Task Force has a significant amount of work to accomplish, now that the assessment study has been concluded. We offer the following suggestions for things to consider and processes that may assist the group in reaching a consensus opinion about future postsecondary education option(s) for Cape Girardeau and surrounding communities. ■ Provide descriptions and conceptual framework for each option so all members have a clear understanding of what it will be like, what is required of all parties for that option to occur, and how it will best meet local needs and underserved population segments. ■ Discuss envisioned or desired features of each option in some detail, as small changes may make a dramatic difference on how that option is evaluated. ■ Determine short-term versus long-term goals and objectives of the area and identify how these are best met by each option. ■ Identify and list significant criteria/factors considered most important by each member of the Coalition in terms of how to evaluate the options. ■ Once the criteria or factors are agreed upon, decide how they will be weighted or prioritized or should they be equal. (Will cost be given equal weight as other factors such as governance and control, or transferability of credit?) ■ Identification of "deal breakers" or "deal makers" are often critical points that sometimes remain hidden in discussions until the end. These should be on - the -table early on. (For example, if land were donated instead of purchased, would that change the perception of one or more options?) ■ Involve all major stakeholders in the decision process, planning and implementation (if that is the outcome), as all will have to live with the Coalition's decision and the resulting changes to local postsecondary education opportunities. The options prescribed so far, all have long-term implications for all parties involved, and all have varying direct and indirect risks and impacts. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-14 Needs Assessment Conclusions ■ The agreement and formation of the Coalition was a collaborative step by all stakeholders. The review and evaluation process of potential options for improved access to education degree programs should continue to be cooperative in nature and not conflicting or divisive. The ultimate "goal" of this effort has been to improve postsecondary education opportunities for the residents and communities in the Cape Girardeau area. It has been a long time arriving at this point in the process, and there is still a long a way to go before new opportunities and options are actually operating and available to students. Sight of this collective goal should not be lost or forgotten throughout the evaluation and decision process. MGT of America, Inc. Page 7-15 Educational Needs Analysis of the Cape Girardeau Area plopt" Volume II: Final Report Appendices Submitted to: Cape Girardeau Area Chamber of Commerce Education Coalition Task Force Submitted by: MGT of America, Inc. 2123 Centre Pointe Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32308 March 25, 2009 Educational Needs Analysis of the Cape Girardeau Area Volume II: Final Report Appendices Submitted by: MGT;;;E OF AMERICA, INC. 2123 Centre Pointe Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32308 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A: HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT SURVEY APPENDIX B: HIGH SCHOOL SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS APPENDIX C: POSTSECONDARY STUDENT SURVEY APPENDIX D: POSTSECONDARY STUDENT SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS APPENDIX E: LIST OF STUDENT SURVEY PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS APPENDIX F: EMPLOYER SURVEY APPENDIX G EMPLOYER SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS APPENDIX H: LIST OF PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS APPENDIX I: COMPARISON TO SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI EXPERIENCE APPENDIX J: DETAILED OCCUPATIONAL PROJECTIONS APPENDIX A: HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT SURVEY APPENDIX A CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA Assessment of Higher Education Needs Survey of Area High School Juniors and Seniors Fall 2008 (To be taken in -class) Introduction and Overview A consortium of local businesses, educators, and community leaders is working with the Cape Girardeau Chamber of Commerce to conduct an assessment of higher education needs across the local area. Through this survey process, we are seeking input about the current education programs and services available and future needs. Your responses will be very helpful as local education leaders seek to ensure access to college level degree programs. Your responses will be confidential. Please print legibly and completely spell out all written responses. Thank you for your participation. Please follow your school administrator's instructions for returning the completed survey. 1. During the year after graduation from high school, do you plan to attend college? ❑1 Yes ❑2 Not sure ❑3 No (skip to question 2) IF YOU ANSWERED YES OR NOT 1 a. Do you plan to attend college: ❑1 Part-time ❑2 Full-time ❑3 Not sure 1 b. What type of college are you most likely to attend immediately after graduating? *Note: If you are planning to attend a two-year/community college and then transfer to a four-year college, please select "Two-Year/Community College." (Please select one response from column A and one response from column B.) A B ❑, Technical/Vocational College/Center ❑2 Two-Year/Community College ❑3 Four -Year College/University ❑4 Other (please specify): ❑, Public institution 02 Private institution 03 Other (please specify): 1 c. If you answered "Two-Year/Community College", do you eventually plan to transfer to another institution? ❑1 Yes ❑2 Not sure ❑3 No MGT of America, Inc. Page A-1 2. Appendix A 1d. What is therip mars reason you are interested in attending your first choice institution? (Select only one) ❑1 Athletics ❑11 Financial aid availability/scholarships ❑2 Away from home ❑12 Flexible course offerings/program ❑3 Best curriculum ❑13 Friends/family members who attend(ed) ❑4 Close to home ❑14 Good reputation ❑5 Close to work ❑15 Large institution/class size ❑6 Convenient scheduling ❑16 Small institution/class size ❑, Cost (Affordable) LJ 17 Recommended by someone ❑g Course/program selection ❑18 Other (please specify): ❑9 Faculty ❑10 Familiarity with the school Are you currently taking classes beyond high school or are you enrolled in degree/training program(s)? If no, skip to question 3. ❑1 Yes, dual credit or dual enrollment classes ❑2 Yes, degree/training program leading to a certificate or A.A.S degree ❑3 No (skip to question 3) 2a. If you are enrolled in college classes, please check each of the educational providers (beyond high school) from which are you are currently taking courses. (Check all that apply) ❑1 Southeast Missouri State University ❑1 Shawnee Community College ❑1 Cape Girardeau Career & Technology ❑1 Southern Illinois University — Center Carbondale ❑1 Mineral Area College ❑1 Other (please specify): 01 Three Rivers Community College 2b. Where do you take the majority of these (non -high school) classes? (Select one) Cape Girardeau, MO ❑1 Southeast Missouri State University — ❑6 Main Campus ❑2 Cape Girardeau Career & Technical Center Poplar Bluff, MO Three Rivers Community College — Main Campus Park Hills, MO Mineral Area College — Main Campus Out of State Shawnee Community College (Any Campus) Southern Illinois University — Carbondale Online/Other Online Other (please specify): MGT of America, Inc. Page A-2 ❑7 Perryville, MO ❑3 Perryville Higher Education Center ❑g Sikeston, MO ❑4 Southeast Missouri State University — ❑9 Sikeston ❑5 Three Rivers Community College — Sikeston ❑10 ❑11 Poplar Bluff, MO Three Rivers Community College — Main Campus Park Hills, MO Mineral Area College — Main Campus Out of State Shawnee Community College (Any Campus) Southern Illinois University — Carbondale Online/Other Online Other (please specify): MGT of America, Inc. Page A-2 Appendix A Future Higher Education Needs 3. What is your interest level in pursuing educational opportunities in Cape Girardeau County? (Select only one) ❑, Extremely interested (skip to question 4) ❑3 Not very interested ❑2 Somewhat interested (skip to question 4) ❑4 Not at all interested IF NOT VERY OR NOT AT ALL INTERESTED, 3a. Why would you not be interested in obtaining educational opportunities locally? (Select all that apply) ❑, Program of interest not available in ❑5 Cost (not affordable) the area ❑2 Reputation of local colleges/ ❑6 Lack of financial aid availability programs ❑, Desire to leave the area ❑3 Inconvenient scheduling ❑8 May not qualify for admission ❑4 Location not convenient ❑9 Other (please specify): 3b. Of these, what is therip mart' reason why you may not be interested in obtaining educational opportunities locally? (Select only one) ❑, Program not available in the area ❑5 Cost (not affordable) ❑2 Reputation of local colleges/ ❑6 Lack of financial aid availability programs ❑, Desire to leave the area ❑3 Inconvenient scheduling ❑g May not qualify for admission ❑4 Location not convenient ❑9 Other (please specify): 4. If two-year degree programs with credits that transfer to a four-year college or university were offered by a community college in Cape Girardeau County, how likely would you be to begin your higher education at that community college: A: If aroarams were offered in the countv throuah an existina. nearbv communitv colleae? (such as Mineral Area College or Three Rivers Community College) ❑, Very likely ❑z Somewhat likely ❑3 Somewhat unlikely LJ4 Very unlikely 4 1 would not consider this option B: If the Cape Girardeau Career & Technoloav Center was converted to a communitv colleae? ❑, Very likely ❑z Somewhat likely ❑3 Somewhat unlikely Qa Very unlikely 4 1 would not consider this option C: If aroarams were offered throuah a newly established communitv colleae in the countv? ❑, Very likely ❑2 Somewhat likely ❑3 Somewhat unlikely Qa Very unlikely 4 1 would not consider this option MGT of America, Inc. Page A-3 5. IA 7 Q In what field of study would you like to obtain your first college degree? (Please enter code using attached list — Table A: De -gree Program List) — OR — ❑98 Other Degree (not listed in Table A): Appendix A (Please indicate) ❑99 I do not plan to attend college, regardless of local program availability. (skip to question 9) Are there any educational programs of interest to you that are currently not offered in the local area? ❑1 Yes ❑2 No (skip to question 7) 6a. /f yes, please list the program(s) and degree level(s): Please indicate how you intend to finance your education and related expenses while obtaining your first higher education degree. (Select all that apply) ❑1 Grants ❑, Full-time job ❑2 Scholarships ❑8 Part-time job ❑3 Student loans ❑9 Savings ❑4 Assistantship ❑10 Veteran's benefits ❑5 Work/Study program ❑11 Spouse, family, or partner ❑6 Parents/Guardians (including PLUS Ll 12 Other (please specify): loans they may have) What is the highest degree level you eventually plan to obtain? (Select only one) ❑1 High School/GED ❑6 Master's degree (M.A., M.S., M.B.A., etc.) ❑2 Vocational/Technical certificate ❑, Education Specialist (Ed.S.) ❑3 Associate degree (A.A.S. or A.S.) ❑8 Doctorate degree (Ph.D., Ed.D.) ❑4 Associate degree (A.A. — transferable ❑9 Professional degree to a 4 -year college/university) (e.g., Law, Medicine, Dentistry) ❑5 Bachelor's degree (B.A., B.S., etc.) ❑10 Other (please specify): MGT of America, Inc. Page A-4 Appendix A Demographic Data 9. Which high school do you currently attend? 10. Please indicate your current grade level. ❑, Junior (11`h grade) ❑2 Senior (12th grade) 11. What is your highest composite ACT score? ❑, 30 or higher ❑2 27 to 29 ❑3 24 to 26 ❑4 21 to 23 ❑5 18 to 20 ❑6 16 to 17 ❑, 15 or lower ❑8 Have not taken the ACT. 12. What is your cumulative high school GPA on a 4.0 scale? ❑, 3.50 to 4.00 ❑2 3.00 to 3.49 ❑3 2.50 to 2.99 ❑4 2.00 to 2.49 ❑5 Lower than 2.00 ❑6 Not sure 13. What is your gender? ❑, Female ❑2 Male Please follow your school administrator's instructions for returning the completed survey. If you have any questions, feel free to contact our consultant at MGT of America: Robert W. Holloway 2123 Centre Pointe Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32308 (850) 386-3191 Robert Ho1loway(cDMGTofAmerica.com MGT of America, Inc. Page A-5 Appendix A Table A — DEGREE PROGRAM LIST Agricultural Sciences O1 Agriculture (General) 02 Agricultural Biochemistry/Biotechnology 03 Agricultural Business 04 Animal/Veterinary Science 05 Entomology 06 Environmental Science 07 Horticulture Architecture & Related Programs 08 Architecture 09 Graphic Design 10 Interior Design 11 Aviation Business 12 Accounting 13 Finance 14 Hospitality Administration 15 Information & Management Sciences 16 International Relations 17 Management (General) 18 Marketing & Sales 19 Risk Management/Insurance & Real Estate Communications 20 General Studies 21 Broadcast Media 22 Print Media 23 Speech 24 Computer & Information Sciences 25 Construction Trades (Carpentry, Welding, etc.) 26 Cosmetology Criminolozy/Law 27 Criminal Justice 28 Pre -Law 29 Protective Services/Law Enforcement Education 30 Educational Administration 31 Physical Education 32 Special Education 33 Teacher Education (Elementary/Secondary) Engineering 34 Chemical Engineering 35 Civil and Environmental Engineering 36 Electrical Engineering 37 Engineering Technology 38 Computer Engineering 39 Industrial Engineering 40 Mechanical Engineering Fine Arts/Liberal Arts 41 General Studies 42 English 43 Ethics 44 Foreign Language 45 History 46 Literature 47 Mathematics 48 Philosophy 49 Statistics 50 Theology/Religious Studies Health Professions 51 Dental Hygiene 52 Diagnostic Imaging 53 Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) 54 Laboratory Technology 55 Other Health Technologies 56 Health Administration 57 Nursing 58 Pre -Med 59 Physical Therapy 60 Respiratory Therapy 61 Other Therapy Human Sciences 62 Family & Child Sciences 63 Apparel and Fashion Merchandising 64 Nutrition, Food, & Exercise Science 65 Textiles & Consumer Sciences 66 Interpersonal Skills/Leadership 67 Manufacturing/Production 68 Mechanics, Repairers, & Technicians (Automotive, Electrical, etc.) 69 Military Natural & Physical Sciences 70 Astronomy 71 Biology 72 Chemistry 73 Physics 74 Recreation, Park, Hospitality, & Tourism Social Sciences 75 Anthropology 76 Economics 77 Geography 78 Political Science 79 Psychology (General)/Counseling 80 Psychology (Child) 81 Sociology/Social Work 82 Urban and Regional Planning Visual & Performing Arts 83 Art 84 Dance 85 Music 86 Theater 87 Undecided MGT of America, Inc. Page A-6 APPENDIX B: HIGH SCHOOL SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT SURVEY METHODOLOGYAND RESULTS This Appendix details the methodology and sample construction of the survey as well as presenting the full range of data collected through this data collection activity. Methodolo Nine hundred seventy five surveys were distributed in mid November, 2008 to 20 area high schools for completion by juniors and seniors. Schools were asked to submit student response by November 251" As of the closing date for data collection, a total of 786 responses were received from 15 schools, yielding a response rate of 80.6 percent. Data Analysis QUESTION 1 PLANS TO ATTEND COLLEGE FOLLOWING HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION (n=786) 4.3%0.6% Yes Not Sure No No response MGT of America, Inc. Page B-1 Appendix B QUESTION 1A PART-TIME/FULL-TIME COLLEGE ENROLLMENT PLANS FOLLOWING HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION (n=742) Part-time Full-time Not sure QUESTION 1B TYPE OF COLLEGE MOST INTERESTED IN ATTENDING (n=730) 3.4% Technical/Vocational College/Center Two-year/Community College Four-year College or University Other MGT of America, Inc. Page B-2 Appendix B QUESTION 1B TYPE OF COLLEGE MOST INTERESTED IN ATTENDING — PUBLIC/PRIVATE (n=416) Public institution Private institution Other QUESTION 1C OF THOSE WHO PLAN ON A TWO-YEAR COLLEGE, INTENT TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER INSTITUTION (n=218) 62.7% 3.4% Technical/Vocational College/Center ■ Two-year/Community College ■ Four-year College or University Other MGT of America, Inc. Page B-3 Appendix B QUESTION 1D PRIMARY REASON FOR INTEREST IN FIRST CHOICE INSTITUTION (n=719) Primary reason for interest in your first choice institution? % (n=719) Course/program selection 19.89% Close to home 18.08% Cost 12.38% Athletics 10.29% Best curriculum 6.95% Financial Aid availability/scholarships 5.29% Good reputation 5.15% Other 5.01% Away from home 3.62% Familiarity with the school 2.78% Friend/ family members who attend(ed 2.64% Recomended by someone 2.36% Small institution/class size 1.67% Close to work 1.39% Convenient scheduling 0.97% Flexible course offerings/program 0.56% Large institution/class size 0.560/( Faculty MGT of America, Inc. Page B-4 Appendix B QUESTION 2 ARE YOU TAKING CLASSES BEYOND HIGH SCHOOL OR ARE YOU ENROLLED IN DEGREE/TRAINING PROGRAMS? (n=786) r ■ Yes, dual credit or dual enrollment ■ Yes, degree/training program leading to a certificate or AAS ■ No F1 No Response QUESTION 2A FROM WHICH PROVIDERS ARE YOU CURRENTLY TAKING CLASSES? (n=314) 1.3%0.0% 21.3% Southeast Missouri State University Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center Mineral Area College Three Rivers Community College Shawnee Community College MGT of America, Inc. Page B-5 Appendix B QUESTION 2B FROM WHICH PROVIDER DO YOU TAKE THE MAJORITY OF YOUR CLASSES? (n=249) 4; 1.2% 4.0% 4.4% ■ Mineral Area College - Main Campus ■ Southeast Missouri State Univeristy - Sikeston Perryville Higher Education Center ■ Online ■ Southeast Missouri State University -Main Campus ■ Other Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center QUESTION 3 INTEREST IN PURSUING EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES LOCALLY (n=786) 22.4' 3.4% ■ Extremely interested ■ Somewhat interested Notvery interested ■ Not at all interested No Response MGT of America, Inc. Page B-6 Appendix B QUESTION 3A REASONS FOR LACK OF INTEREST IN PURSUING EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES LOCALLY (n=278) Desire to leave the area Program not available in local area Reputation of colleges/programs Other Location not convenient6.5% CostF2.9% 5.4% Lack of financial aid2% Do not qualify for admission Inconvenient scheduling 02.9% M 20.1% 13.7% 39.6% 61 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0 QUESTION 3B PRIMARY REASON FOR LACK OF INTEREST IN PURSUING EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES LOCALLY (n=277) Desire to leave the area Program not available in local area Reputation of colleges/programs Other Cost Location not convenient Inconvenient scheduling Lack of financial aid availability Do not qualify for admission .4% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% MGT of America, Inc. Page B-7 I 48 4.9 9.0 7.6 /o 4.0% 2.5 o 1.8° 1.1% 0.7% {" i .4% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% MGT of America, Inc. Page B-7 Appendix B QUESTION 4A -C INTEREST LEVEL IN LOCAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE OPTIONS If programs were offered through a newly established community college in the county? (n=663) Ifthe Cape Girardeau Career and Technical Center was converted to a community college? (n=663) If programs were offered in the county through an existing nearby community college? (n=663) 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100,0% QUESTION 4A INTEREST LEVEL IN EXISTING COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=154) No Southeast Acceptance (n=44) Possible Southeast Acceptance (n=187) Marginal Southeast Acceptance (n=73) Certain Southeast Acceptance (n=200) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely ■ Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely ■ I would not consider this option ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely ■ I would not consider this option MGT of America, Inc. Page B-8 Appendix B QUESTION 4B INTEREST LEVEL IN CTC CONVERSION TO A COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=153) No Southeast Acceptance (n=46) Possible Southeast Acceptance (n=187) Marginal Southeast Acceptance (n=73) Certain Southeast Acceptance (n=200) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% QUESTION 4C INTEREST LEVEL IN NEWLY ESTABLISHED COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=156) No Southeast Acceptance (n=46) Possible Southeast Acceptance (n=188) Marginal Southeast Acceptance (n=72) Certain Southeast Acceptance (n=200) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely I would not consider this option ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely I would not consider this option MGT of America, Inc. Page B-9 Appendix B QUESTION 5 INTENDED FIELD OF STUDY FOR RESPONDENTS' FIRST COLLEGE DEGREE (n=752) Intended field of study for first college degree % (n=752) Other 9.44% Nursing 7.18% Undecided 5.59% Pre -Med 5.05% Teacher Education 4.52% Physical Therapy 3.99% I do not plan to go to college 3.59% Mechanical Engineering 3.32% Management General 2.53% Construction Trades 2.26% Criminal Justice 2.26% Animal/Veterinary Science 2.13% Architecture 2.13% Mechanics, Repairers and Technicians 2.13% Music 1.99% Dental Hygiene 1.86% Graphic Design 1.73% Computer Information Sciences 1.73% Physical Education 1.73% Pre -Law 1.60% Psychology (General) 1.60% Cosmetology 1.46% Computer Engineering 1.46% Biology 1.46% Agricultural Business 1.33% Accounting 1.33% Other Health Technologies 1.33% Broadcast Media 1.20% Marketing and Sales 1.06% Other Therapy 1.06% Military 1.06% Art 1.06% Finance 0.93% Electrical Engineering 0.80% History 0.80% Emergency Medical Technician 0.80% Political Science 0.80% Agriculture 0.66% Intended field of study for first college degree % (n=752) Aviation 0.66% Protective Services/Law Enforcement 0.66% Special Education 0.66% Nutrition, Food and Exercise Science 0.66% Environmental Science 0.53% Engineering Technology 0.53% Industrial Engineering 0.53% Literature 0.53% Psychology Child 0.53% Sociology/Social Work 0.53% Print Media 0.40% Educational Administration 0.40% Civil and Environmental Engineering 0.40% Foreign Language 0.40% Respiratory Therapy 0.40% Family and Child Services 0.40% Anthropology 0.40% Horticulture 0.27% Interior Design 0.27% Chemical Engineering 0.27% English 0.27% Technology 0.27% Health Administration 0.27% Chemistry 0.27% Physics 0.27% Theater 0.27% Information and Management Services 0.13% Risk Management/Insurance, Real Estate 0.13% Mathematics 0.13% Philosophy 0.13% Theology/Religious Studies 0.13% Diagnostic Imaging 0.13% Textiles and Consumer Science 0.13% Interpersonal Skills/Leadership 0.13% Astronomy 0.13% Recreation, Parks, Hospitality, Tourism 0.13% Dance 0.13% MGT of America, Inc. Page B-10 Appendix B QUESTION 6 ARE THERE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS OF INTEREST TO YOU THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE LOCALLY? (n=786) 11.6% C QUESTION 7 HOW DO YOU PLAN TO FINANCE YOUR EDUCATION? (n=759) Scholarships Full-time job Student loans Parents/Guardians Grants Savings Part-time job Work/study Spouse, family, or partner Other Veteran's benefits Assistanship 34.4% 9.8% IM=12.0% 11.3% 9.9% 5.4% 153.6 Yes No No response 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% MGT of America, Inc. Page B-11 QUESTION 8 HIGHEST DEGREE RESPONDENTS PLAN TO ATTAIN (n=786) Master's degree Bachelor's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree Associate Degree AA Associate Degree AAS or AS Vocational/technical certificate No response High school/GED Other Education Specialist 8.7% 7.3% 16.9% 16.5% 9% 2% Appendix B 25.4% 25.2% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% QUESTIONS 9-13 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH SCHOOL RESPONDENTS (n=786) Gender Female 48.9% Male 49.6% No response 1.5% Class Standing Junior 43.0% Senior 42.7% No response 14.2% Highest Composite ACT Score 30 or higher 3.3% 27 to 29 6.6% 24 to 26 8.1% 21 to 23 10.4% 18 to 20 10.8% 16 to 17 4.3% 15 or lower 1.0% Have not taken the ACT. 40.6% No response 14.8% MGT of America, Inc. Page B-12 Appendix B QUESTIONS 9-13 (Continued) DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH SCHOOL RESPONDENTS (n=786) GPA 3.50 to 4.00 31.9% 3.00 to 3.49 20.2% 2.50 to 2.99 13.1% 2.00 to 2.49 4.8% Lower than 2.00 1.3% Not sure 13.9% No response 14.8% High School Notre Dame Regional High School 12.6% Cape Central High School 12.3% CTC - High School Students 12.2% Perryville High School 11.1% Jackson High School 10.6% Chaffee High School 6.2% Thomas W. Kelly High School 5.7% Woodland 5.7% Scott City High School 5.3% Delta High School 3.2% Leopold High School 3.2% Meadow Heights 3.2% Oak Ridge 3.2% Saxony Lutheran High School 2.8% Zalma RV High School 1.7% Eagle Ridge Christian School 1.0% MGT of America, Inc. Page B-13 APPENDIX C: POSTSECONDARY STUDENT SURVEY APPENDIX C CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA Assessment of Higher Education Needs Postsecondary Student Survey (for PAPER -based delivery) November 2008 Introduction and Overview A consortium of local businesses, educators, and community leaders is working with the Cape Girardeau Area Chamber of Commerce to conduct an assessment of higher education needs across the local area. Through this survey process, we are seeking input about the current education programs and services available and future needs. Your responses will be very helpful as local education leaders seek to ensure access to college level degree programs. Participants that enter their e-mail addresses at the conclusion of this survey will be eligible to win either one of two (2) $100 or two (2) $50 gift certificates to the bookstore of their choice. Limit one entry per student. Your responses will be confidential. Thank you for your participation. A. Current Status Other than high school, in what type of educational or training program(s) are you currently enrolled? (Check all that apply) ❑1 Two-year transfer degree (AA) 01 Continuing education 01 Two-year technical degree (AAS, AS) 01 Custom employer training 01 Technical certificate (non -degree) 01 Tech Prep 01 Four-year undergraduate (BA, BS, etc.) 01 Dual Enrollment LJ Other (please specify): Please check each of the educational providers below from which you are currently taking courses or are enrolled in degree/training program(s). (Check all that apply) ❑1 Southeast Missouri State University ❑1 Cape Girardeau Career & Technology Center 01 Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing 01 Mineral Area College ❑1 Three Rivers Community College Ell Shawnee Community College Ell Southern Illinois University — Carbondale Ell Other (please specify): MGT of America, Inc. Page C-1 Appendix C 3. Where do you take the ma'ori of your courses? (Select one) Cave Girardeau, MO Poplar Bluff, MO ❑1 Southeast Missouri State University — ❑7 Three Rivers Community College — Main Campus Main Campus ❑2 Cape Girardeau Career & Technology Center Park Hills, MO ❑3 Southeast Missouri Hospital College of ❑g Mineral Area College — Main Campus Nursing Perryville, MO ❑4 Perryville Higher Education Center Sikeston, MO ❑5 Southeast Missouri State University — Sikeston ❑6 Three Rivers Community College — Sikeston 3a. Do you take any courses online? ❑ 1 No 02 Yes, but only a few 03 Yes, quite a few 3b. What is your enrollment status? El Part-time student 02 Full-time student Out of State ❑9 Shawnee Community College (Any Campus) 010 Southern Illinois University— Carbondale Other ❑ 11 Other (please specify): 4. What is your current major or program of study? [Select one code from the Program of Studies matrix listed under question #21 on page 8] 5. Please indicate your current grade level. ❑ 1 High school student 02 College freshman 03 College sophomore ❑4 College junior ❑5 College senior ❑6 Graduate school student 6. What is your highest composite ACT score? ❑ 1 30 or higher 02 27 to 29 03 24 to 26 ❑4 21 to 23 ❑5 18 to 20 ❑6 16 to 17 ❑7 15 or lower ❑8 Have not taken the ACT. MGT of America, Inc. Page C-2 Appendix C 7. What is your cumulative high school GPA on a 4.0 scale? ❑ 1 3.50 to 4.00 02 3.00 to 3.49 03 2.50 to 2.99 04 2.00 to 2.49 05 Lower than 2.00 ❑6 Not sure 8. What is your cumulative college GPA on a 4.0 scale? E 10 ❑ 1 3.50 to 4.00 ❑2 3.00 to 3.49 03 2.50 to 2.99 04 2.00 to 2.49 05 Lower than 2.00 06 Not sure Are you currently employed? (Select one) ❑1 Yes 1:12 No (slap to question 10) 9a. Do you work: (Select one) ❑1 Part-time ❑2 Full-time 9b. Which of the following educational benefits are available to you from your current employer? (Select all that apply) ❑1 Full tuition reimbursement ❑1 Partial tuition reimbursement ❑1 Flex time ❑1 Time off from work ❑ 1 Participating in courses while at work ❑ 1 Other (please specify): ❑ 1 No benefits of this type are offered Please indicate how you are currently financing your education and related expenses while obtaining your degree. (Select all that apply) ❑1 Tuition waivers or grants ❑1 Other scholarships ❑ 1 Student loans ❑ 1 Assistantship ❑1 Work/Study program ❑1 Part-time job ❑ 1 Full-time job ❑1 Missouri A+ program ❑1 State Grants (e.g., Access Missouri, Bright Flight) ❑1 Federal Grants (e.g., Pell, SEOG, ACG) ❑1 Savings o Veteran's benefits ❑1 Parents/Guardians ❑1 Spouse, family, or partner ❑1 Employer (benefits) ❑1 Southeast Missouri State University scholarship ❑1 Other (please specify): MGT of America, Inc. Page C-3 Appendix C 11. What is (are) the main reason(s) you chose to take courses from your selected provider(s) of educational services? (Select up to three responses) ❑1 Away from home Ell Quality of program(s) ❑1 Close to home ❑1 Close to work ❑ 1 Convenient scheduling Ell Cost (affordable) ❑1 Course/program selection ❑ 1 Faculty ❑ 1 Familiarity with the college B. Future Higher Education Needs ❑1 Financial aid availability/scholarships o Flexible course offerings/program ❑ l Friends/family members who attend (ed) ❑ 1 Good reputation ❑1 High school related program ❑ Did not qualify for other institution ❑1 Recommended by someone ❑ Small institution/class size ❑ 1 Other (please specify): 12. What are your plans immediately following completion of your current training or education program? (Select all that apply from Column A and one from Column B if you have chosen that response) A B ❑1 Continue in my current employment position on a part-time basis o Related to my degree 1:12 Not related to my degree ❑ 1 Related to my degree ❑1 Continue in my current employment position on a full-time basis ❑Z Not related to my degree ❑ 1 Related to my degree ❑ Obtain a new full-time position ❑z Not related to my degree ❑ 1 In the local area ❑1 Continue my education/enroll in a two-year community college ❑Z Outside the local area 03 Not sure ❑ 1 In the local area ❑l Continue my education/enroll in a four-year college or university ❑Z Outside the local area 03 Not sure ❑ 1 Other (please specify): 13. In the future, how interested would you be in pursuing additional educational opportunities, if available, in Cape Girardeau County? (Select one) ❑ 1 Extremely interested ❑Z Somewhat interested 1:13 Not very interested ❑4 Not at all interested MGT of America, Inc. Page C-4 Appendix C 14. What is the highest degree level you eventually plan to obtain? (Select one) ❑t Vocational/Technical certificate 112 Associate degree (A.S. or A.A.S.) ❑3 Associate degree (A.A. — transferable to a four-year college/university) ❑3 Bachelor's degree (B.A., B.S.) 04 Master's degree (M.A., M.S., M.B.A.) ❑5 Education Specialist (Ed.S.) ❑6 Doctorate degree (Ph.D., Ed.D.) 07 Professional degree (e.g., Law, Medicine, Dentistry) ❑8 Other (please specify): (If the highest degree you plan to obtain is the one you are currently pursuing, please skip to question 22). The next set of questions refers explicitly to the next step you will take towards formal education. Please ensure that your responses reference the program in Your immediate plans as opposed to any successive educational pursuits. 15. Regarding the next step in your plans for formal education, how likely is it that you will obtain this degree from a provider in the Cape Girardeau area? (Select one) ❑I Extremely likely (skip to question 16) ❑2 Somewhat likely (skip to question 16) ❑3 Not very likely ❑4 Not at all likely 15a. If not likely or not very likely, why not? (Select all that apply) ❑I Program not available in the area ❑I Cost (not affordable) ❑ I Reputation of local colleges/ programs ❑ 1 Lack of financial aid availability ❑1 Inconvenient scheduling o Desire to leave the area ❑1 Location not convenient ❑I Do not qualify for admission ❑ 1 Other (please specify): 15b. Of these, which is the primary reason why you may not be likely to obtain this degree from a provider in the Cape Girardeau area? (Select one) ❑ 1 Program not available in the area 1:15 Cost (not affordable) ❑2 Reputation of local colleges/programs 06 Lack of financial aid availability ❑3 Inconvenient scheduling ❑7 Desire to leave the area ❑4 Location not convenient ❑g Do not qualify for admission ❑9 Other (please specify): (skip to question 22) MGT of America, Inc. Page C-5 Appendix C 16. Is there a particular institution you are most interested in attending other than the one where you are currently enrolled? (Select only one) Cane Girardeau, MO Poplar Bluff, MO ❑I Southeast Missouri State University — ❑7 Three Rivers Community College — Main Campus Main Campus 02 Cape Girardeau Career & Technology Center Park Hills, MO ❑3 Southeast Missouri Hospital College of ❑g Mineral Area College — Main Campus Nursing Perryville, MO ❑4 Perryville Higher Education Center Sikeston, MO ❑5 Southeast Missouri State University — Sikeston ❑6 Three Rivers Community College — Sikeston Out of State ❑9 Shawnee Community College (Any Campus) ❑lo Southern Illinois University— Carbondale Other ❑ 11 Other (please specify): 17. For each of the following course delivery options, please indicate whether it would be preferable, acceptable, or not desirable to you: (Select one rating for each option) MGT of America, Inc. Page C-6 Preferable Acceptable Not Desirable a. Traditional (face-to-face) classroom instruction b. Internet or Web -based courses c. CD/DVD d. Traditional length course schedule (15-16 week term) e. Accelerated/condensed course schedule (shorter term) f. Weekend courses/sessions g. Other (please specify): MGT of America, Inc. Page C-6 18 19 20. Appendix C Which days of the week are best for you to take courses? (Circle all that apply) Monday Thursday Saturday No Preference Tuesday Friday Wednesday Sunday For each of the following time periods, please indicate whether it would be preferable, acceptable, or not desirable to you when taking courses: (Select one rating for each time period.) Please indicate how you plan to finance your education and related expenses while obtaining your degree goal. (Select all that apply) ❑ 1 Tuition waivers or grants ❑1 Other scholarships ❑1 Student loans ❑ 1 Assistantship ❑l Work/Study program ❑ 1 Part-time job ❑ 1 Full-time job ❑ 1 Missouri A+ program ❑1 State Grants (e.g., Access Missouri, Bright Flight) ❑1 Federal Grants (e.g., Pell, SEOG, ACG) ❑1 Savings ❑1 Veteran's benefits ❑I Parents/Guardians ❑ 1 Spouse, family, or partner ❑1 Employer (benefits) ❑1 Southeast Missouri State University scholarship ❑ 1 Other (please specify): MGT of America, Inc. Page C-7 Preferable Acceptable Not Desirable a. Mornings (8am-1 lam) b. Lunchtime (I Iam-1 m c. Afternoon 1 m — 4 m d. Evening (4pm-6pm) e. Night (6pm-9pm) f. Other (please specify): Please indicate how you plan to finance your education and related expenses while obtaining your degree goal. (Select all that apply) ❑ 1 Tuition waivers or grants ❑1 Other scholarships ❑1 Student loans ❑ 1 Assistantship ❑l Work/Study program ❑ 1 Part-time job ❑ 1 Full-time job ❑ 1 Missouri A+ program ❑1 State Grants (e.g., Access Missouri, Bright Flight) ❑1 Federal Grants (e.g., Pell, SEOG, ACG) ❑1 Savings ❑1 Veteran's benefits ❑I Parents/Guardians ❑ 1 Spouse, family, or partner ❑1 Employer (benefits) ❑1 Southeast Missouri State University scholarship ❑ 1 Other (please specify): MGT of America, Inc. Page C-7 Appendix C 21. In what field of study do you hope to obtain this degree? (Circle one) Agricultural Sciences ❑1 Agriculture (General) ❑2 Agricultural Biochemistry/Biotechnology 03 Agricultural Business ❑4 Animal/Veterinary Science 4 Entomology ❑6 Environmental Science ❑7 Horticulture Architecture & Related Programs ❑8 Architecture ❑3 Graphic Design ❑10 Interior Design ❑11 Aviation Business LA Accounting LA Finance ❑14 Hospitality Administration ❑15 Information & Management Sciences L11 International Relations ❑17 Management (General) 018 Marketing & Sales 019 Risk Management/Insurance & Real Estate Communications '-320 General Studies 41 Broadcast Media 42 Print Media ❑23 Speech 44 Computer & Information Sciences 45 Construction Trades (Carpentry, Welding, etc.) 026 Cosmetology Criminology/Law 027 Criminal Justice 48 Pre -Law 49 Protective Services/Law Enforcement Education L330 Educational Administration L331 '--31 Physical Education 032 Special Education ❑33 Teacher Education (Elementary/Secondary) Engineering 034 Chemical Engineering 035 Civil and Environmental Engineering L336 Electrical Engineering L337 '37 Engineering Technology L338 '--38 Computer Engineering ❑39 Industrial Engineering L340 Mechanical Engineering Fine Arts/Liberal Arts LJ41 General Studies 42 English X13 Ethics '144 Foreign Language 045 History '146 Literature '147 Mathematics L348 Philosophy L349 Statistics ❑50 Theology/Religious Studies Health Professions 051 Dental Hygiene ❑52 Diagnostic Imaging ❑53 Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) ❑54 Laboratory Technology ❑55 Other Health Technologies ❑56 Health Administration �7 L357 Nursing ❑58 Pre -Med ❑59 Physical Therapy 4o Respiratory Therapy 41 Other Therapy Human Sciences ❑G2 Family & Child Sciences 43 Apparel and Fashion Merchandising 44 Nutrition, Food, & Exercise Science 45 Textiles & Consumer Sciences ❑66 Interpersonal Skills/Leadership LJ67 Manufacturing/Production L368 Mechanics, Repairers, & Technicians (Automotive, Electrical, etc.) L369 Military Natural & Physical Sciences 40 Astronomy U71 Biology ❑72 Chemistry ❑73 Physics 0/4 Recreation, Parks, Hospitality, & Tourism Social Sciences Q75 Anthropology 46 Economics 47 Geography 48 Political Science 49 Psychology (General)/Counseling 4o Psychology (Child) U81 Sociology/Social Work 42 Urban and Regional Planning Visual & Performing Arts 43 Art 44 Dance 45 Music 46 Theater 47 Undecided 48 Other (please specify): MGT of America, Inc. Page C-8 Appendix C 22. If two-year degree programs with credits that transfer to a four-year college or university were offered by a community college in Cape Girardeau County, how likely would you be (or would you have been) to begin your higher education at that community college: A: If urograms were offered in the county through an existing, nearby community college? (such as Mineral Area College or Three Rivers Community College) ❑1 Very likely ❑2 Somewhat likely 03 Somewhat unlikely 04 Very unlikely ❑5 I would not consider this option B: If the Cape Girardeau Career & Technology Center was converted to a community college? o Very likely ❑2 Somewhat likely ❑3 Somewhat unlikely 04 Very unlikely 05 I would not consider this option C: If urograms were offered through a newly established community college in the county? o Very likely 02 Somewhat likely 03 Somewhat unlikely ❑4 Very unlikely 05 I would not consider this option 23. Are there any post -high school educational programs or training of interest to you that are currently not offered in the local area? (Select one) El Yes ❑2 No (skip to question 24) 23a. Please list the program(s) and degree levels for each program(s) suggested: (be specific) C. Demographic Data 24. What is your gender? (Select one) 111 Female ❑2 Male 25. What is your current age? (Select one) ❑1 Under 18 ❑5 45-54 ❑2 18-24 06 55-64 ❑3 25-34 1:17 65 or older ❑4 35-44 MGT of America, Inc. Page C-9 26. What is the highest level of education you have completed thus far? (Select one) ❑l Currently attending High School 02 Some High School, No Diploma ❑3 High School Diploma or GED 04 Vocational/Technical Certificate ❑5 Some College, No Degree ❑6 Associate Degree (A.S., A.A.S.) ❑7 Associate Degree (A.A. — transferable to a four-year college/university) ❑g Bachelor's Degree (B.A., B.S., etc.) Appendix C ❑g Master's Degree (M.A, M.S., M.B.A.) ❑9 Education Specialist (Ed.S.) ❑Io Doctorate Degree (Ph.D., Ed.D.) ❑11 Professional Degree (e.g., Law, Medicine, Dentistry) ❑ 12 Other (please specify): If you would like to be entered in a drawing to receive a $100 or $50 gift certificate to the bookstore of your choice, please enter your e-mail address here: Thank you for your participation! MGT of America, Inc. Page C-10 APPENDIX D: POSTSECONDARY STUDENT SURVEY METHODOLOGYAND RESULTS APPENDIX D POST -SECONDARY STUDENT SURVEY METHODOLOGYAND RESULTS This Appendix details the methodology and sample construction of the survey as well as presenting the full range of data collected through this data collection activity. Methodolopy On-line surveys were made available to 1,387 students at Mineral Area College, Southeast Missouri State University and the Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center in mid November, 2008 for completion by current students. Hard copy surveys were distributed to students at Three Rivers Community College, as the institution was unable to distribute the surveys electronically. As of the closing date for data collection, a total of 319 responses were received from postsecondary students, yielding a response rate of 22.99 percent. Data Analysis QUESTION 1 TYPE OF EDUCATIONAL/TRAINING PROGRAMS IN WHICH RESPONDENTS ARE CURRENTLY ENROLLED (n=319) Four year undergraduate (BA, BS, etc) Two-year transfer degree (AA) Two-year techincal degree (AAS, AS) Continuing education Other Technical certificate (non -degree) Tech prep Dual Enrollment Custom employer training 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-1 Appendix D QUESTION 2 EDUCATIONAL PROVIDERS FROM WHICH RESPONDENTS ARE CURRENTLY TAKING COURSES (n=319) Three Rivers Community College Southeast Missouri State University Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center Mineral Area College Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing Other Shawnee Community College Southern Illinois University - Carbondale 0.0% 7% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% QUESTION 3 PRIMARY EDUCATIONAL PROVIDER FROM WHICH RESPONDENTS ARE CURRENTLY TAKING COURSES (n=319) Three Rivers Community College - Main Campus Southeast Missouri State University - Main Campus Three Rivers Community College -Sikeston Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center Other Southeast Missouri State Univeristy - Sikeston Unreported Mineral Area College- Main Campus 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-2 36. 276% 14.7% 12 9% 6.0% P1. 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-2 25.1 QUESTION 3A DO YOU TAKE ONLINE COURSES? (n=319) 6.6% 0.3% Appendix D ■ No ■ Yes, but only a few Yes, quite a few ■ Unreported 8.0% QUESTION 3B ENROLLMENT STATUS OF RESPONDENTS (n=319) 1.88% ■ Full-time student ■ Part-time student Unreported 1/0 MGT of America, Inc. Page D-3 QUESTION 4 CURRENT MAJOR OR PROGRAM OF STUDY (n=271) Current major or program of study % (n=271) Nursing 24.4% Teacher Education (Elementary/Secondary) 9.6% Management (General) 5.5% Computer Information Sciences 4.8% Accounting 4.47/6 Criminal Justice 4.1% Sociology/Social Work 3.7% Respiratory Therapy 3.3% Dental Hygiene 2.6% Psychology General 2.6% Animal/Veterinary Science 1.8% General Studies Liberal Arts 1.8% Finance 1.5% General Studies 1.5% Pre -Med 1.5% Physical Therapy 1.5% Biology 1.5% Undecided 1.5% Other 1.5% Broadcast Media 1.1% Mechanical Engineering 1.1% Technology 1.1% Nutrition, Food and Exercise Science 1.1% Mechanics, Repairers and Technicians 1.1 Art 1.1% Horticulture 0.7% Architechture 0.7% Appendix D Current major or program of study % (n=271) Hospitality Administration 0.7% Information and Management Services 0.7% Print Media 0.7% Physical Education 0.7% Civil and Environmental Engineering 0.7% Industrial Engineering 0.7% English 0.7% Mathematics 0.7% Chemistry 0.7% Agriculture 0.4% Agricultural Business 0.4% Graphic Design 0.4% Marketing and Sales 0.4% Pre -Law 0.4% Protective Services/Law Enforcement 0.4% Special Education 0.4% Chemical Engineering 0.4% Electrical Engineering 0.4% Computer Engineering 0.4% Philosophy 0.4% Other Therapy 0.4% Manufacturing/Production 0.4% Recreation, Parks, Hospitality, and Tourism 0.4% Political Science 0.406 Psychology (Child) 0.4% Music 0.4% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-4 Appendix D QUESTIONS 5-8 EDUCATIONAL LEVEL, ACT SCORE, AND GPA OF RESPONDENTS (n=319) Current Educational Level High school student 2.51% College freshman 58.31% College sophomore 39.18% ACT Score 30 or higher 4.70% 27 to 29 5.96% 24 to 26 13.79% 21 to 23 20.38% 18 to 20 19.12% 16 to 17 6.27% 15 or lower 3.45% Have not taken the ACT 22.88% Unreported 3.45% Cumulative High School GPA 3.50 to 4.00 29.47% 3.00 to 3.49 31.66% 2.50 to 2.99 18.50% 2.00 to 2.49 2.51% Not sure 16.61% Unreported 1.25% Cumulative College GPA 3.50 to 4.00 25.08% 3.00 to 3.49 23.82% 2.50 to 2.99 16.30% 2.00 to 2.49 4.08% Lower than 2.00 1.25% Not sure 28.53% Unreported 0.94% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-5 QUESTION 9 EMPLOYMENT STATUS (n=319) QUESTION 9A PART-TIME VS. FULL-TIME STATUS (n=236) Appendix D Currently employed Unemployed Part-time ■ Full-time MGT of America, Inc. Page D-6 Appendix D QUESTION 9B EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS OFFERED BY RESPONDENTS' EMPLOYERS (n=236) 28.09 ■ No benefits of this type are offered ■ Flextime Time off from work ■ Full tuition reimbursement ■ Participating in courses at work 28.0/ Partial tuition reimbursement QUESTION 10 MEANS OF FINANCING EDUCATION (n=319) Means of financing education % n=319 Federal grants 37.30% Student loans 32.60% Part-time job 25.71% Parents/guardians 23.82% Other scholarships 18.81% Full-time job 13.79% Tuition waivers and grants 12.23% State grants 10.66% Savings 10.34% Southeast Missouri State University scholarship 9.40% Spouse, family, or partner 8.78% Missouri A+ program 7.52% Other 5.64% Veteran's benefits 3.76% Work/study 1.57% Employer 1.57% Assistanship 0.31% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-7 Appendix D QUESTION 11 MAIN REASON WHY YOU'VE CHOSEN TO TAKE COURSES FROM YOUR EDUCATIONAL PROVIDER(S) (n=319) Main Reason You've Chosen to Take Courses from Your Selected Provider % Close to home 74.92% Cost 51.10% Financial aid availability 22.26% Convenient scheduling 18.50% Close to work 16.30% Course/program selection 15.67% Quality of program 12.85% Small institution/class size 10.66% Familiarity with the college 9.40% Good reputation 8.78% Friends/family who attend(ed) 6.27% flexible course offerings/program 3.45% Recommended by someone 3.13% Other 3.13% Faculty 2.82% High school related program 1.25% Away from home 0.94% Did not qualify for other institution 0.94% QUESTION 12 A AND B PLANS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF DEGREE (n=319) MGT of America, Inc. Page D-8 Raw Numbers of Respondents # Respondents % (n=319) not related in the outside Plans Following Completion of Degree related to to the local the not sure degree degree area local area Continue in my current position on a part-time basis 40 12.54% 20 37 Continue in my current position on a full-time basis 51 15.99% 37 21 Obtain a new full-time position 162242.63%/. 0.78 % 145 8 Continue my education/enroll in a two-year community college 320.03 % 4 8 12 Continue my education/enroll in a four-year college or university 136 46 34 4Other 226.90% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-8 Appendix D QUESTION 13 INTEREST LEVEL IN PURSUING EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES LOCALLY (n=312) 7.37% 47.12% ■ Extremely interested ■ Somewhat interested Not very interested ■ Not at all interested QUESTION 14 HIGHEST DEGREE RESPONDENTS PLAN TO OBTAIN (n=319) 6.09%1 2.24% 1.92/ o ■ Vocational/technical 8.01%I 17.63/o o certficate 0.32% ■ Associate Degree Bachelor's Degree ■ Master's degree ■ Education Specialist 30.45% 33.33% Doctorate Degree MGT of America, Inc. Page D-9 Appendix D QUESTION 15 HOW LIKELY IS IT THAT YOU WILL OBTAIN YOUR HIGHEST DEGREE FROM A PROVIDER IN THE CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA? (n=319) 21.91 i q n70u ■ Extremely likely ■ Somewhat likely Not very likely ■ Not at all likely QUESTION 15A REASONS WHY NOT FOR THOSE WHO RESPONDED "NOT LIKELY" OR "NOT VERY LIKELY" (n=99) Program not available in local area Location not convenient Desire to leave the area Cost Lack of financial aid Other Inconvenient scheduling Reputation of colleges/programs Do not qualify for admission 47 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-10 27. 26.3 16.2 .1% % 8. 6.1% 6.1% 47 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-10 Appendix D QUESTION 15B PRIMARY REASON WHY NOT FOR THOSE WHO RESPONDED "NOT LIKELY" OR "NOT VERY LIKELY" (n=97) Program not available in local area Desire to leave the area Location not convenient Cost Other Reputation of colleges/programs Inconvenient scheduling Lack of financial aid availability 45 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% QUESTION 16 INSTITUTION YOU ARE MOST INTERESTED IN ATTENDING, OTHER THAN THE ONE WHERE YOU ARE ENROLLED (n=220) Institution most interested in attending other than the one # in which you're currently enrolled respondents % (n=220) Southeast Missouri State University - Main Campus 44.09% 97 15.5% 19.09% 42 Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing 9.09% 20 15.5% 7.27% 16 Three Rivers Community College - Main Campus 7.27% 16 8.2% 4.55% 10 Three Rivers Community College - Sikeston 2.73% 6 7.2% 2.73% 6 Mineral Area College - Main Campus 1.82% 4 .1% 0.91% 2 Perryville Higher Education Center 0.45% 1.0 3.1% 45 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% QUESTION 16 INSTITUTION YOU ARE MOST INTERESTED IN ATTENDING, OTHER THAN THE ONE WHERE YOU ARE ENROLLED (n=220) Institution most interested in attending other than the one # in which you're currently enrolled respondents % (n=220) Southeast Missouri State University - Main Campus 44.09% 97 Other 19.09% 42 Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing 9.09% 20 Southeast Missouri State Univeristy - Sikeston 7.27% 16 Three Rivers Community College - Main Campus 7.27% 16 Cape Girardeua Career and Technology Center 4.55% 10 Three Rivers Community College - Sikeston 2.73% 6 Southern Illinois University - Carbondale 2.73% 6 Mineral Area College - Main Campus 1.82% 4 Shawnee Community College (Any Campus) 0.91% 2 Perryville Higher Education Center 0.45% 1.0 MGT of America, Inc. Page D-11 Appendix D QUESTION 17 PREFERRED COURSE DELIVERY OPTIONS Preferred Course Delivery Options % (n=283) Monday 58.0% Preferable Acceptable Not desirable Traditional face-to-face classroom instruction (n=245) 82.9% 15.5% 1.6% Internet or Web -based courses (n=244) 18.4% 59.0% 22.5% CD/DVD (n=239) 5.4% 28.5% 66.1% Preferred Course Delivery Options 22.6% 39.8%1 37.606 Preferable Acceptable Not desirable Traditional length courses (15-16 weeks) (n=241) 49.0% 47.7% 3.3% Accelerated courses (shorter term) (n=244) 22.5%1 62.3% 15.2% Weekend courses (n=243) 5.8%1 29.6%1 64.6% QUESTION 18 MOST DESIRABLE DAY OF THE WEEK FOR COURSES (n=283) Which days of the week are best for you to take courses? % (n=283) Monday 58.0% Tuesday 61.1% Wednesday 56.2% Thursday 61.5% Friday 43.1% Saturday 3.9% Sunday 1.8% No preference 22.8% QUESTION 19 MOST DESIRABLE TIME OF DAY FOR COURSES Which time of day is best for you to take courses? Preferable Acceptable Not desirable Mornings (8am-1lam) (n=244) 54.9% 28.0% 17.1% Lunchtime (11am-1pm) (n=240) 45.0% 36.2% 18.8% Afternoon (fpm-4pm) (n=239) 36.7% 40.6% 22.8% Evening (4pm-6pm) (n=235) 22.6% 39.8%1 37.606 Night (6pm-9pm) (n=237) 19.2% 29.2%1 51.6% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-12 Appendix D QUESTION 20 PLANS FOR FINANCING EDUCATIONAL GOAL (n=220) Plans for financing educational goal % (n=220) Student loans 55.5% Federal grants 52.3% Part-time job 39.1% Other scholarships 36.4% Full-time job 31.8% Parents/guardians 30.0% Tuition waivers and grants 27.3% State grants 18.6% Savings 15.5% Spouse, family, or partner 16.4% Southeast Missouri State University scholarship 11.8% Missouri A+ program 9.5% Employer 6.8% Work/study 7.7% Veteran's benefits 6.4% Assistanship 1.8% Other 0.9% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-13 Appendix D QUESTION 21 FIELD IN WHICH RESPONDENTS HOPE TO EARN THEIR NEXT DEGREE (n=245) Intended field of study for next college degree % (n=245) Nursing 24.9% Teacher Education(Elementary/Secondary) 8.2% Other 6.1% Accounting 4.5% Management (General) 3.7% Respiratory Therapy 3.7% Sociology/Social Work 3.3% Criminal Justice 2.9% Dental Hygiene 2.9% Pre -Med 2.4% Psychology (General) 2.4% Computer Information Sciences 2.0% Undecided 2.0% Graphic Design 1.6% Broadcast Media 1.6% Protective Services/Law Enforcement 1.6% Physical Education 1.6% Mechanical Engineering 1.6% Animal/Veterinary Science 1.2% Horticulture 1.2% Finance 1.2% General Studies 1.2% General Studies Liberal Arts 1.2% Art 1 1.2% Hospitality Administration I Intended field of study for next college degree % (n=245) Print Media 0.8% Special Education 0.8% Civil and Environmental Engineering 0.8% Electrical Engineering 0.8% Technology 0.8% Physical Therapy 0.8% Mechanics, Repairers and Technicians 0.8% Biology 0.8% Chemistry 0.8% Psychology (Child) 0.8% Music 0.8% Agricultural Business 0.4% Marketing and Sales 0.4% Pre -Law 0.4% Chemical Engineering 0.4% Computer Engineering 0.4% Industrial Engineering 0.4% English 0.4% Mathematics 0.4% Philosophy 0.4% Other Health Technologies 0.4% Other Therapy 0.4% Nutrition, Food and Exercise Science 0.4% Recreation, Parks, Hospitality, and Tourism 0.4% Political Science 0.4% QUESTION 22 ANSWER TO "HOW LIKELY WOULD YOU BE TO BEGIN YOUR HIGHER EDUCATION THROUGH A NEARBY COMMUNITY COLLEGE?" Newly established community college in the county (n=302) CG CTC convert to a community college (n=303) Existing nearby community college (n=305) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely ■ Iwould not considerthis option MGT of America, Inc. Page D-14 Appendix D QUESTION 22A HOW LIKELY WOULD YOU BE TO BEGIN YOUR HIGHER EDUCATION THROUGH AN EXISTING NEARBY COMMUNITY COLLEGE? BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=46) No Southeast Acceptance (n=21) Possible Southeast Acceptance (n=56) Marginal Southeast Acceptance (n=49) Certain Southeast Acceptance (n=128) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely Iwould not consider this option MGT of America, Inc. Page D-15 Appendix D QUESTION 22B HOW LIKELY WOULD YOU BE TO BEGIN YOUR HIGHER EDUCATION IF THE CAPE GIRARDEAU CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER WAS CONVERTED TO A COMMUNITY COLLEGE? BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=46) No Southeast Acceptance (n=27) Possible Southeast Acceptance (n=55) Marginal Southeast Acceptance (n=49) Certain Southeast Acceptance (n=127) ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely Iwould not considerthis option 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% QUESTION 22C HOW LIKELY WOULD YOU BE TO BEGIN YOUR HIGHER EDUCATION AT A NEWLY COMMUNITY COLLEGE IN THE COUNTY? BY LIKELY SOUTHEAST ADMISSION STATUS Unknown Southeast Acceptance (n=46) No Southeast Acceptance (n=26) Possible Southeast Acceptance (n=54) Marginal Southeast Acceptance (n=49) Certain Southeast Acceptance (n=127) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■ Very likely ■ Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely ■ Very unlikely ■ Iwould not considerthis option MGT of America, Inc. Page D-16 Appendix D QUESTION 23 ARE THERE POST -HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS OF INTEREST TO YOU THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE LOCALLY? (n=300) QUESTIONS 24 AND 25 GENDER AND AGE OF RESPONDENTS (n=319) Gender Female 65.8% Male 28.5% Unreported 5.6% Age Under 18 1.3% 18-24 59.6% 25-34 19.7% 35-44 9.1% 45-54 4.4% 55-64 1.3% Unreported 4.7% ■ Yes ■ No MGT of America, Inc. Page D-17 Appendix D QUESTION 26 HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDUCATION RESPONDENTS HAVE COMPLETED THUS FAR (n=319) Some college, no degree High school diploma/GED Vocational/technical certificate Unreported Associate degree Professional degree Bachelor's Degree Currently attending high school 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% MGT of America, Inc. Page D-18 APPENDIX E: LIST OF STUDENT SURVEY PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS APPENDIX E LIST OF STUDENT SURVEY PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS High Schools Surveys were distributed to 20 area high schools for completion by juniors and seniors. Fifteen schools returned surveys for complete analysis, for a total of 786 surveys. ■ Central High School ■ Chaffee Jr. - Sr. High School ■ Delta High School ■ Eagle Ridge Christian School ■ Jackson Senior High School ■ Leopold High School ■ Meadow Heights School District ■ Notre Dame Regional High School ■ Oak Ridge High School ■ Perryville High School ■ Saxony Lutheran High School ■ Scott City High School ■ Thomas W. Kelly High School ■ Woodland High School ■ Zalma High School Postsecondary Institutions Surveys were distributed to students who reside in Bollinger, Cape Girardeau, Scot, or Stoddard counties who attend the following postsecondary institutions (main campus or off campus centers): ■ Southeast Missouri State University ■ Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center ■ Mineral Area College ■ Three Rivers Community College MGT of America, Inc. Page E-1 APPENDIX F: EMPLOYER SURVEY APPENDIX F CAPE GIRARDEAU AREA ASSESSMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION NEEDS SURVEY OF AREA EMPLOYERS Instructions A consortium of local businesses, educators, and community organizations is working with the Cape Girardeau Chamber of Commerce to examine the needs for postsecondary education and training in the Cape Girardeau area. We ask that you, as one of a select number of area employers, respond to our survey regarding workplace education and training needs. The survey focuses on the following four areas: ❖ your awareness and satisfaction with local training and education opportunities; ❖ current and projected training and education needs of your employees; ❖ future education and training needs and preferences of your business/organization. The information you provide will be invaluable in shaping future programs and training to be offered by local education providers. This study is your opportunity to provide critical input into the skills and training your employees need to increase your business' success. This web -based questionnaire asks about specific education and training needs at your company or organization along with current levels of utilization and detailed preferences for education and training delivery. It is usually best completed by the person who oversees training and education locally, such as your personnel manager or human resource director. Please forward this to the most appropriate person in your organization for completion. Please complete this survey by December 15, 2008 All responses will be kept confidential. Questions regarding the purpose of this survey and the broader study may be directed to: John Mehner, President Cape Girardeau Chamber of Commerce (573) 335-3312 Thank you for your participation in this important study. We appreciate your time and involvement in this effort, and look forward to your response. MGT of America, Inc. Page F-1 Appendix F A. Current Employee Training 1. What kinds of educational or training activities are most needed by your employees? (Check all that apply.) a. Basic skills (e.g., reading, math) ❑ g. College degrees — Graduate ❑ (1) b. HS Diploma/GED completion ❑ (1) h. Continuing professional education 13 (1) c. Job -specific education and training ❑ (1) i. Technology training/certification ❑ (1) d. Certificate programs ❑ (1) j. Other (please spec) ❑ (1) e. College degrees — Associate ❑ (1) ❑ (1) f College degrees — Bachelor's ❑ (1) ❑ (1) 2. How are education/training programs involving your employees currently provided? (Check all that apply.) 3 4 5 What factors weigh most heavily in your decision of how to provide education and training to your employees? (Check all that apply) a. Cost of instruction On-site Off-site a. By company trainers ❑ ❑ (1) b. By educational institutions or ❑ (1> (1) training organizations institution to provide the needed c. Through distance learning or ❑ (1> ❑ (1) telecommunications c. My organization's technological ❑ (1) 3 4 5 What factors weigh most heavily in your decision of how to provide education and training to your employees? (Check all that apply) a. Cost of instruction ❑ (1) d. Quality of instruction ❑ (1) b. Convenience (e.g., location or time) ❑ (1) e. The ability of a higher education ❑ (1) institution to provide the needed education and training c. My organization's technological ❑ (1) f Other (please specie) ❑ (1) capacity (e.g., computing) Please estimate your organization's expected growth in terms of staffing over the next five years. Likely to decline ❑ (1) Remain at current level ❑ (z) Likely to grow by 5-10% ❑ (3) Likely to grow by more ❑ than 10% (4) For which occupations do you anticipate a shortage of qualified applicants over the next five years (e.g., engineer, computer technician, accountant)? Please rank, beginning with the area of highest anticipated need. Within Your Company Within Your Company (1 s) (4tb) (2nd) (5th) (3rd) (6d,) MGT of America, Inc. Page F-2 Appendix F B. Education and Training Needs Agricultural Sciences LJ43 Ethics 01 Agriculture (General) 44 Foreign Language 02 Agricultural Biochemistry/Biotechnology Q5 History 03 Agricultural Business 046 Literature 4 Animal/Veterinary Science ❑47 Mathematics 05 Entomology 48 Philosophy ❑6 Environmental Science ❑99 Statistics g Horticulture 05o Theology/Religious Studies Architecture & Related Programs Health Professions ❑8 Architecture 41 Dental Hygiene L39 Graphic Design 052 Diagnostic Imaging 010 Interior Design 43 Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) QI Aviation 44 Laboratory Technology Business 012 Accounting Ell Finance 014 Hospitality Administration ❑15 Information & Management Sciences Ell International Relations ❑17 Management (General) Ol8 Marketing & Sales 019 Risk Management/Insurance & Real Estate Communications 020 General Studies 021 Broadcast Media 022 Print Media 323 Speech 024 Computer & Information Sciences Q25 Construction Trades (Carpentry, Welding, etc.) ❑26 Cosmetology Criminology/Law ❑27 Criminal Justice 028 Pre -Law 49 Protective Services/Law Enforcement Education 030 Educational Administration ❑31 Physical Education L332 Special Education 43 Teacher Education (Elementary/Secondary) Engineering ❑34 Chemical Engineering ❑35 Civil and Environmental Engineering 036 Electrical Engineering 037 Engineering Technology ❑38 Computer Engineering ❑39 Industrial Engineering 40 Mechanical Engineering Fine Arts/Liberal Arts QI General Studies Q2 English 45 Other Health Technologies ❑56 Health Administration ❑57 Nursing L358 Pre -Med Qy Physical Therapy Qo Respiratory Therapy LAI Other Therapy Human Sciences 0G2 Family & Child Sciences 063 Apparel and Fashion Merchandising '-364 Nutrition, Food, & Exercise Science 45 Textiles & Consumer Sciences 066 Interpersonal Skills/Leadership 067 Manufacturing/Production ❑68 Mechanics, Repairers, & Technicians (Automotive, Electrical, etc.) ❑69 Military Natural & Physical Sciences 40 Astronomy 071 Biology 072 Chemistry L- 3 Physics 074 Recreation, Parks, Hospitality, & Tourism Social Sciences 45 Anthropology 076 Economics 47 Geography 078 Political Science 079 Psychology (General)/Counseling 40 Psychology (Child) L381 Sociology/Social Work Qz Urban and Regional Planning Visual & Performing Arts 43 Art LJ84 Dance ❑85 Music L386 Theater From the list shown above, please indicate what fields/disciplines and levels your employees will most need education and training over the next five years? INCLUDE UP TO 10 SLOTS FOR PROGRAMS CODES OF NEED Place the program code number in appropriate blank, and then select one or more levels of education for that program. MGT of America, Inc. Page F-3 Appendix F 2. Are there any other higher education programs that are needed in the greater Cape Girardeau area? (Please be specific) At what level are they needed? Program Description: Level (certificate, 2 -year, 4 -year graduate/professional degree): 3. What incentives does your organization provide to encourage employee participation in training and education? (Check all that apply.) a. Release time from work ❑ (1) e. Subsequent promotion ❑ (1) b. Leaves of absence ❑ (1) f Subsequent salary increase ❑ (1) c. Tuition reimbursement ❑ (1) g. Other (please specify) ❑ (1) d. Full tuition reimbursement ❑ (1) h. None ❑ (1) 4. What method of educational/training delivery is most appropriate for your employees? (Check all that apply) a. In class, face-to-face instruction ❑ (1) d. Instruction via the Internet/Web- ❑ (1) based b. Instruction at a satellite or off- ❑ (1) e. Video Tape/CD/DVD ❑ 0) campus location c. Instruction via interactive ❑ Q) f Other (please specify) ❑ 0) videoconferencing (two-way video) 5. For your employees, which days of the week are best for education programs? (Check all that apply.) Monday ❑ (1) Thursday ❑ (1) Saturday ❑ (1) No Preference ❑ (1) Tuesday ❑ Q) Friday ❑ (1) Sunday ❑ (1) Wednesday ❑ (1) 6. For your employees, what times of day are best for education programs? (Check all that apply) a. Early Morning ❑ (1) c. Lunchtime ❑ e. Late afternoon/early ❑ �1� evening b. Mid-morning ❑ (1) d. Mid-afternoon ❑ (1) f. Night ❑ (1) g. No preference ❑ (1) 7. For your employees, how often should education classes meet? (Check all that apply) a. Once a week ❑ (1) d. Other: ❑ (1) b. Several times per week ❑ (1) e. No preference ❑ (1) c. Every day ❑ (11 MGT of America, Inc. Page F-4 Appendix F C. Opinions Regarding Local Higher Education Options 1. Please indicate if your company relies on local postsecondary educational entities to provide the following training and education when your company is looking for new hires or to upgrade skills of current employees: a. Southeast Missouri State University — Main Campus b. Cape Girardeau Career & Technical Center c. Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing d. Perryville Higher Education Center e. Southeast Missouri State University — Sikeston Campus £ Three Rivers Community College at Sikeston g. Three Rivers CC Main Campus (Poplar Bluff) h. Mineral Area College Main Campus (Park Hills) i. Shawnee Community College j. Southern Illinois University — Carbondale k. Other Provider (Please Indicate): Certificate (Trade or Technical) Training for Prospective Employees: (by Degree/Certification Level): Associate Bachelor's Graduate ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (1) � n/a ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑(,) ❑(,) ❑ „) ❑ n> ❑ (n ❑ (,) ❑ (,) 2. Which entity do you rely upon the most for education and training? 9M Training for Current Employees (by Type) Continuing Degree On -Site Education Completion Training ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (1) El (1) El (1) E3 (1) ❑0) ❑O ❑cu ❑ (,) ❑ (,) ❑ cv ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (,) ❑ (1) ❑ (I) ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (,) ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (,) ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (1) ❑ (,) ❑ (1) Other Training (Please Indicate) MGT of America, Inc. Page F-5 Appendix F 3. How well do the following institutions meet your needs when hiring qualified new employees? For any "very well" or "not at all" remarks, please briefly indicate the reason(s) why you selected this level in the comment field labeled "Explain" on the far -right hand. Very Not Very Not at Not Provider Well Somewhat Neutral Well All Applicable Explain: a. Southeast Missouri State ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (s) ❑ (6) University — Main Campus b. Cape Girardeau Career & ❑ (1) E30 (2) (3) 13E30 (4) (5) (6) Technical Center c. Southeast Missouri Hospital ❑ (1) ❑ (2) 1:1131:1❑ (3) (4) (5) (6) College of Nursing d. Perryville Higher Education ❑ (1) ❑ (z) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (s) ❑ (6 Center e. Southeast Missouri State ❑ (i> E3 (2)❑ (3) 13(a) E3 (5) E3(6) University— Sikeston Center f Three Rivers Community ❑ (i) 1:1❑ (z� (3) 11❑ (a� (s> ❑ (6) College at Sikeston g. Three Rivers SS Main Campus ❑ (i) ❑ (z) ❑ (3) ❑ (a) ❑ (s) ❑ (6 (Poplar Bluff) h. Mineral Area College Main ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (s) ❑ (6) Campus (Park Hills) i. Shawnee Community College ❑ 0) ❑ (z) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) ❑ (6 j. Southern Illinois University — ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) ❑ (6 Carbondale k. Other Provider (Please Indicate): ❑ (1) ❑ (z) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (s) ❑ (6) MGT of America, Inc. Page F-6 Appendix F 4. How well do the following institutions meet your needs for providing continuing education and training for current employees? For any "very well" or "not at all" remarks, please briefly indicate the reason(s) why you selected this level in the comment field labeled "Explain" on the far -right hand. Very Not Very Not at Not Provider Well Somewhat Neutral Well All Applicable Explain: a. Southeast Missouri State ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (s) ❑ (6) University — Main Campus b. Cape Girardeau Career & ❑ (1) 131313130 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Technical Center c. Southeast Missouri Hospital ❑ (1) ❑ (2) 1:1131:1❑ (3) (4) (5) (6) College of Nursing d. Perryville Higher Education ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) ❑ (6 Center e. Southeast Missouri State ❑ (i> 13(z) 13(3) 13(a) 13(s) E3(6) University— Sikeston Center f. Three Rivers Community ❑ (i) 1:1❑ (z� (3) 11❑ (a� (s> ❑ (6) College at Sikeston g. Three Rivers SS Main Campus ❑ (i) ❑ (z) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (s) ❑ (6 (Poplar Bluff) h. Mineral Area College Main ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (s) ❑ (6) Campus (Park Hills) i. Shawnee Community College ❑ 0) ❑ (z) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) ❑ (6 j. Southern Illinois University — ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) ❑ (6 Carbondale k. Other Provider (Please Indicate): ❑ (1) 0 (z) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (s) ❑ (6) MGT of America, Inc. Page F-7 Appendix F 5. Are there particular groups or segments of the local population that you feel do not have appropriate access to postsecondary education and training? a. Yes ❑ (1) b. No ❑ (2) Please explain: 6. Any other comments or concerns regarding local post -secondary education training needs that have not been covered? D. Employer Characteristics 1. How many employees currently work at your business site(s) located in the area? (Cape Girardeau and surrounding counties) # of Employees 2. Approximately what percentage of your employees would you classify as: (Your responses should sum to 100%.) a. Management % d. Clerical % (Functions above the IS` level of supervision, consistently (Examples include receptionist, secretary, word employing independent judgment.) processor) b. Professional % e. Laborers % (Typically requires bachelor's degree or higher, or (Examples include plumbers, carpenters, truck drivers, professional licensure) warehouse help) c. Technical/Paraprofessional % f. Other % (Examples include dental assistant, paralegal, x-ray technician) TOTAL: 100% 3. Please estimate the number of individuals in each category that you anticipate hiring per year over the next five years. None 1-5 6-10 11-25 >25 a. Management (Functions above the Is` level of supervision, consistently employing independent judgment.) b. Professional (Typically requires bachelor's degree or higher, or professional licensure) c. Technical/Paraprofessional (Examples include dental assistant, paralegal, x-ray technician) d. Clerical (Examples include receptionist, word processor) e. Laborers (Examples include plumbers, carpenters, truck drivers, warehouse help) f. Other ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) ❑ (1) ❑ (2) ❑ (3) ❑ (4) ❑ (5) MGT of America, Inc. Page F-8 Appendix F 4. Which industry category best represents your major line of business? (Please check the one most appropriate, according to North American Industry Classification System code) a. Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing ❑ (oi) k. Real Estate and Rental and Leasing ❑ and Hunting (NAICS 11) (NAICS 53) b. Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and 0 (02) 1. Professional, Scientific, and ❑ (12) Gas Extraction (NAICS 21) Technical Services (NAICS 54) c. Utilities (NAICS 22) ❑ (03) m. Management of Companies and ❑ (13) Enterprises (NAICS 55) d. Construction (NAICS 23) ❑ (04) n. Administrative and Support and ❑ (14) Waste Management and Remediation Services (NAICS 56) e. Manufacturing (NAICS 31-33) ❑ (05) o. Educational Services (NAICS 61) ❑ (15) £ Wholesale Trade (NAICS 42) 0 (O6) p. Health Care and Social Assistance © (16) (NAILS 62) g. Retail Trade (NAICS 44-45) 13 (07) q. Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation ❑ (17) (NAILS 71) h. Transportation and ❑ (08) r. Accommodation and Food Services 13 (18) Warehousing (NAICS 48-49) (NAICS 72) i. Information (NAICS 51) ❑ (O9) s. Other Services (except Public 0 p9> Administration) (NAICS 81) j. Finance and Insurance 13 (lo) t. Public Administration (NAICS 92) ❑ (20) (NAICS 52) u. Other ❑ (zl) Thank you for your help and comments! MGT of America, Inc. Page F-9 SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS APPENDIX G EMPLOYER SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS This Appendix details the methodology and sample construction of the survey as well as presenting the full range of data collected through this data collection activity. Methodology Employer contacts were gathered via two sources: the Cape Girardeau Area Chamber of Commerce and a third party proprietary vendor. The Chamber provided about 49 employer contacts while over 700 were purchased from InfoUSA. The sample purchased from InfoUSA represented their complete database of the larger (100 or more employees) area businesses and partial samples of successively smaller -size categories. MGT distributed survey invitation letters to the combined total of 758 businesses in November 2008. The initial invitation letters were followed up with postcard reminders about two weeks later. Successively, the largest area employers that had not yet participated were contacted via telephone in order to request participation. As of the closing date for data collection (January 12, 2009), a total of 86 full or partial responses were received, yielding a response rate of 11.3 percent. Sample Characteristics Based on an amalgamation of employer responses to the number of persons they employ and information provided along with contacts by InfoUSA, we estimate that the businesses responding to the survey represented at least 9,300 employees in the local workforce, which represents about 12 percent of the estimated four -county workforce of 77,000 individuals'. As detailed in Figure 1, the largest proportion of the businesses responding to the survey was the segment of small businesses employing between 20 and 49 individuals. The second largest proportion was moderately sized businesses employing between 100 and 249 individuals. It is important that information was gathered from a variety of businesses in terms of size, as this aspect of their operations may cause them to react differently to the various economic shifts and trends facing the market at this time. ' Per the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW); sum of employment for Bollinger, Cape Girardeau, Scott, and Stoddard counties. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-1 Appendix G FIGURE 1 BUSINESS SIZE (n=86) How many employees currently work at your business site(s) located in the area? 1to19 -7.0% 20 to 49 48.8% 50 to 99 16.3% 100 to 249 20.9% Total number of employees covered by sample: 9,350 250 to 499 2.3% Average number of employees per responding organization: 109 500 to 999 2.3% Median number of employees per responding organization: 40 1,000 or greater 2.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. As depicted in Figure 2, the largest proportions of the workforces employed by the businesses reached by the survey were either professionals (34 percent) or general laborers (28 percent). However, reasonable proportions of management, technical/paraprofessional, skilled trades, and clerical positions were also represented within the sample. Representation from the varied occupational classes ensures that the survey will gauge training and education interests for a broad spectrum of workers by skill set and training requirement. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-2 Appendix G FIGURE 2 WORKFORCE BY CLASS (QUESTION D-2) (n=64) Approximately what percentage of your employees would you classify as: (Your responses should sum to 100%.) % Management 10.8% • Professional 34.1% • Technical/ 11.3% Paraprofessional % Clerical 8.7% % Laborers 27.8% % Other 7.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. In terms of the industries represented, the respondent set reflects input from the majority of major industries in the area (Figure 3). However, some limitations or caveats do exist in this respect, foremost of which is the observation that the educational services sector is largely over -represented in the sample. Consequently, we see that the proportionate representation of other sectors is somewhat suppressed, in relative terms (a smaller proportion of the 100 percent employment level). Secondly, we see that some smaller industry sectors lacked respondent input. Specifically, the natural resources and mining sector, the information sector, and the professional and business services sector each accounted for less than 1 percent of the total sample. However, these respective industries cumulatively represent less than 10 percent of broader labor market employment levels. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-3 Appendix G FIGURE 3 COMPARISON OF ACTUAL MARKET AREA EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY TO SURVEY SAMPLE REPRESENTATION (n=86) Total Employment Covered by Survey Sample Compared to Total Employment Estimates per Bureau of Labor Statistics ■ Estimated Survey Response* ■ Employment by Industry (2007 Annual Average) Natural Resources 0.0% and Mining ' 1.4% Construction 61.7% 4.9% Manufacturing 14.4% mii Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 22.1% Information 10.9% 1.7% Financial 1.9°% Activities 3.9% Professional and o.s% Business Services 6.7% Education and 62.3% Health Services 17.9% Leisure and4.6% Hospitality E9.8% Other Services �8% 2.7% Public 4.4% Administration 14.5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008 and Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, 2007. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-4 Appendix G Survey Responses by Question Full response frequencies for questions from the survey (excluding qualitative responses and those detailed in the preceding methodology section) are included below. QUESTION A-1 WHAT KINDS OF EDUCATIONAL OR TRAINING ACTIVITIES ARE MOST NEEDED BY YOUR EMPLOYEES? (n=86) What kinds of educational or training activities are most needed by your employees? (Check all that apply.) Other (please specify) Technology training/certification Continuing professional education College degrees - Graduate College degrees - Bachelor's College degrees - Associate Certificate programs Job -specific education and training HS Diploma/ GED completion Basic skills (e.g., reading, math) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FalUWinter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-5 Appendix G QUESTION A-2 HOW ARE EDUCATION/TRAINING PROGRAMS INVOLVING YOUR EMPLOYEES CURRENTLY PROVIDED? (n=86) How are education/training programs involving your employees currently provided? (Check all that apply.) Through distance learning or telecommunications Byeducational institutions or training organizations By company trainers 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% ■ Off-site ■ On-site Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. QUESTION A-3 WHAT FACTORS WEIGH MOST HEAVILY IN YOUR DECISION OF HOW TO PROVIDE EDUCATION AND TRAINING TO YOUR EMPLOYEES? (n=86) What factors weigh most heavily in your decision of how to provide education and training to your employees? (Check all that apply.) Other (please specify) The ability of a higher education institution to provide the needed education and training Quality of instruction My organization's technological capacity (e.g., computing) Convenience (e.g., location or time) Cost of instruction L% 0% 20% 40% 60% 809/o Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-6 Appendix G QUESTION A-4 PLEASE ESTIMATE YOUR ORGANIZATION'S EXPECTED GROWTH IN TERMS OF STAFFING OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. (n=86) Please estimate your organization's expected growth in terms of staffing over the next five years. Likely to grow by more than 10% Likelyto grow by 5 to 10% Remain at currentlevel Likelyto decline 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-7 Appendix G QUESTIONS A-5 FOR WHICH OCCUPATIONS DO YOU ANTICIPATE A SHORTAGE OF QUALIFIED APPLICANTS OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS (E.G., ENGINEER, COMPUTER TECHNICIAN, ACCOUNTANT)? PLEASE RANK, BEGINNING WITH THE AREA OF HIGHEST ANTICIPATED NEED (n=86) For which occupations do you anticipate a shortage of qualified applicants over the next five years (e.g., engineer, computer technician, accountant)? Please rank, beginning with the area of highest anticipated need. allied health (nurses, EMTs, etc.) skilled trades managers IT& computerscience teachers protective services other sales & customerservice administrative & clerical health technicians (radiology techs, etc.) technical & mechanical general labor health therapists (PT, OT, etc.) food service workers health professions (MDs, PharmDs, etc.) drivers & operators industrial & manufacturing engineering, architecture& related accounting finance marketing& PR 0 100 200 300 400 Estimated Needs Over 5 Years Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-8 Appendix G QUESTION B-1 FROM THE LIST SHOWN ABOVE, PLEASE INDICATE WHAT FIELDS/DISCIPLINES AND LEVELS YOUR EMPLOYEES WILL MOST NEED EDUCATION AND TRAINING OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. (n=73) From the list shown above, please indicate what fields/disciplines and levels your employees will most need education and training overthe next five years. Teacher Education (Elementary/Secondary) Management (General) Computer & Information Sciences Marketing & Sales Special Education Accounting Finance Construction Trades (Carpentry, Welding, etc.) Interpersonal Skills/Leadership Manufacturing/Production Educational Administration Nursing Mechanics, Repairers, &Technicians (Automotive, Electrical, etc.) Physical Education Civil and Environmental Engineering Industrial Engineering Mechanical Engineering Print Media Computer Engineering Mathematics Architecture Broadcast Media Criminal Justice Engineering Technology Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) Other Health Technologies Physical Therapy Family & Child Sciences Nutrition, Food, & Exercise Science Sociology/Social Work Agriculture (General) Agricultural Business Environmental Science Graphic Design Hospitality Administration Information & Management Sciences Risk Management/Insurance & Real Estate Speech Pre -Law Protective Services/Law Enforcement Electrical Engineering General Studies Ethics Foreign Language Literature Diagnostic Imaging Laboratory Technology Health Administration Respiratory Therapy Chemistry Physics Recreation, Parks, Hospitality, &Tourism Psychology (Child) Urban and Regional Planning Theater 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-9 Appendix G QUESTION B-2 LEVEL OF EDUCATION SELECTED FOR PROGRAM NEEDS (n=73) Level of education selected for program needs Graduate or Professional Programs 4 -Year (Bachelor's) Degree Programs 2-Year(Associate) Degree Programs Certificate Programs 0 20 40 60 80 100 Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. QUESTION B-3 WHAT INCENTIVES DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION PROVIDE TO ENCOURAGE EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION IN TRAINING AND EDUCATION? (n=73) What incentives does your organization provide to encourage employee participation in training and education? (Check all that apply.) . I None 9.6% -1 Other (please specify) Subsequent salary increase Subsequent promotion Full tuition reimbursement Tuition reimbursement Leaves of absence Release time from work 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-10 Appendix G QUESTION B-4 WHAT METHOD OF EDUCATIONAL/TRAINING DELIVERY IS MOST APPROPRIATE FOR YOUR EMPLOYEES? (n=73) What method of educational/training delivery is most appropriate for your employees? (Check all that apply.) Other (please specify) Video Tape/CD/DVD Instruction via the Internet/Web-based Instruction via interactive videoconferencing(two- way video) Instruction at a satellite or off -campus location In class, face-to-face instruction 27.4% 84.9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-11 Appendix G QUESTION B-5 FOR YOUR EMPLOYEES, WHICH DAYS OF THE WEEK ARE BEST FOR EDUCATION PROGRAMS? (n=73) For your employees, which days of the week are best for education programs? (Check all that apply.) No Preference Sunday Saturday Friday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Monday 43.8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. QUESTION B-6 FOR YOUR EMPLOYEES, WHAT TIMES OF DAY ARE BEST FOR EDUCATION PROGRAMS? (n=73) For your employees, what times of day are best for education programs? (Check all that apply.) No Preference Night Late afternoon/early evening Mid-afternoon Lunchtime Mid-morning Early Morning 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FalUWinter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-12 Appendix G QUESTION B-7 FOR YOUR EMPLOYEES, HOW OFTEN SHOULD EDUCATION CLASSES MEET? (n=73) For your employees, how often should education classes meet? (Check all that apply.) No Preference Other Every day Severaltimes perweek Once a week 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-13 Appendix G QUESTION C-1 PLEASE INDICATE IF YOUR COMPANY RELIES ON LOCAL POSTSECONDARY EDUCATIONAL ENTITIES TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TRAINING AND EDUCATION WHEN YOUR COMPANY IS LOOKING FOR NEW HIRES OR TO UPGRADE SKILLS OF CURRENT EMPLOYEES (n=63) Please indicate if your company relies on local postsecondary educational entities to provide the following training and education when your company is looking to upgrade skills of current employees: Southeast Missouri State University - Main Campus Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing Perryville Higher Education Center Southeast Missouri State University - Sikeston Campus Three Rivers Community College at Sikeston Three Rivers Community College Main Campus (Poplar Bluff) Mineral Area College Main Campus (Park Hills) Shawnee Community College Southern Illinois University - Carbondale Other 34.9% 28.6% 20.6% 0.0% 25.4% 9.5% 1.6% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 6.3% 6.3% 0.0% 6.3% 1.6% 6.3% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 3.2% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% 1.6% 4.8% 1.6% 0% 10% 20% 30� ■ Continuing Education ■ Degree Programs On -Site Training Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FaIIANinter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-14 Appendix G QUESTION C-2 WHICH ENTITY DO YOU RELY UPON THE MOST FOR EDUCATION AND TRAINING? (n=63) For your employees, what times of day are best for education programs? (Check all that apply.) No Preference Night Late afternoon/early evening Mid-afternoon Lunchtime Mid-morning Early Morning 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-15 Appendix G QUESTION C-3 HOW WELL DO THE FOLLOWING INSTITUTIONS MEET YOUR NEEDS WHEN HIRING QUALIFIED NEW EMPLOYEES? (n=63) How well do the following institutions meet your needs when hiring qualified new employees? ■ Familiarity (% of Respondents Assigning a Rating) ■ Favorability (% Responding "Very Well" or "Somewhat") Southeast Missouri State University - Main Campus Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing Perryville Higher Education Center Southeast Missouri State University - Sikeston Campus Three Rivers Community College at Sikeston Three Rivers Community College Main Campus (Poplar Bluff) Mineral Area College Main Campus (Park Hills) Shawnee Community College Southern Illinois University - Carbondale Other Provider 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. Note: Familiarity is the percentage of respondents assigning a rating to the institution versus the percentage not submitting a response for the particular institution or a response of "n/a," among the total respondents submitting data for Section D of the survey. Favorability calculated as the proportion of those assigning a rating that the institution either met needs "somewhat' or "very well' versus "not very" or "not at all," among those assigning any rating to the institution (per the previously outlined familiarity tabulation). MGT of America, Inc. Page G-16 54.5% 30.2 47.4 28.6% 61.1% 22.2% 50.0% 20.6% 46.2 20.6% 38.5% 15.9 50.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. Note: Familiarity is the percentage of respondents assigning a rating to the institution versus the percentage not submitting a response for the particular institution or a response of "n/a," among the total respondents submitting data for Section D of the survey. Favorability calculated as the proportion of those assigning a rating that the institution either met needs "somewhat' or "very well' versus "not very" or "not at all," among those assigning any rating to the institution (per the previously outlined familiarity tabulation). MGT of America, Inc. Page G-16 Appendix G QUESTION C-4 HOW WELL DO THE FOLLOWING INSTITUTIONS MEET YOUR NEEDS FOR PROVIDING CONTINUING EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOR CURRENT EMPLOYEES? (n=63) How well do the following institutions meet your needs for providing continuing education and training for current employees? ■ Familiarity (% of Respondents Assigning a Rating) ■ Favorability (% Responding "Very Well" or "Somewhat") Southeast Missouri State University - Main Campus Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing Perryville Higher Education Center Southeast Missouri State University - Sikeston Campus Three Rivers Community College at Sikeston Three Rivers Community College Main Campus (Poplar Bluff) Mineral Area College Main Campus (Park Hills) Shawnee Community College Southern Illinois University - Carbondale Other Provider 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-17 L22.2 0 42.9% 25.4% 50.0% 19.0% 33.3% 19.0% 33.3% 19.0/ 50.0% 17.5% 18.2% 15.9% 40.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, Fall/Winter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-17 Appendix G QUESTION C-5 ARE THERE PARTICULAR GROUPS OR SEGMENTS OF THE LOCAL POPULATION THAT YOU FEEL DO NOT HAVE APPROPRIATE ACCESS TO POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION AND TRAINING? (n=63) About 32 percent of respondents indicated that there were "particular groups or segments of the local population [that they felt did] not have appropriate access to postsecondary education." The majority of these respondents indicated that cost of attendance was the primary barrier to access for the groups that were cited. A smaller segment of respondents indicated that particular types or formats of programming were not available in their respective areas. Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FalUwinter 2008. QUESTION D-2 PLEASE ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS IN EACH CATEGORY THAT YOU ANTICIPATE HIRING PER YEAR OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. (n=55) Source: MGT of America, Inc. survey of Cape Girardeau Area employers, FaIlMinter 2008. MGT of America, Inc. Page G-18 GI:A FA LIST OF PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS APPENDIX H LIST OF PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS Survey and Interview Participants The following employers provided input into the study through participation in an on-site or telephone interview, an online survey, or contributed to both efforts. Their contribution is greatly appreciated and provided valuable insight into MGT's understanding of the economic climate, trends, and projections in the Cape Girardeau area. ■ Advance High School ■ Advance Supt Of Public Schools ■ Allen Christian Buick Olds ■ Alma Schrader Elementary School ■ Ameren ■ American Trust Group ■ Andy's Frozen Custard ■ B A Promotions ■ Bella Italia ■ Benton Hill Investment Co. ■ Beussink Hey Roe Seabaugh ■ Big River Telephone Company ■ BioKyowa, Inc. ■ Bits of Heaven In Home Service LLC ■ Boomland ■ Brown Shoe Co ■ Burch Food Service Inc ■ Cape Care For Women ■ Cape Girardeau Chamber of Commerce ■ Cape Girardeau County Family Services ■ Cape Girardeau Public Library ■ Carpenters District Council of Greater St. Louis ■ Charles C Clippard School ■ Chartwells ■ City of Cape Girardeau ■ City of Jackson ■ Coad Toyota ■ Columbia Construction Corp ■ Configurations by Rubbermaid ■ Delta High School ■ Delta Superintendent Office ■ Dexter Police Department ■ Drury Hotels ■ Drury Southwest ■ Duckett Truck Center ■ Early Childhood Education ■ Extended Health Service ■ Fabick Brothers Equipment Co ■ First Missouri State Bank ■ First State Bank & Trust Cc MGT of America, Inc. Page H-1 List of Participating Employers Franklin Elementary School Heartland Wood Products Inc Home Advantage Home Health Service Immaculate Conception Catholic Innovative Idea Integration Jackson City Hall Jackson Junior High School Jackson R-2 Schools Kaiser Midwest Inc Key Realty Kids Korner Child Dev Center Kies Eye Center KISS Koehler Engineering & Land Kohlfeld Distributing Inc KYRX Leopold R III School District Magna -Tel Inc Meadow Heights School District Med Assets Supply Chain Systems Meyer Supply Co MidAmerica Hotels Corporation Missouri Southern Healthcare Missouri Veteran's Home Nestle Purina Petcare Co Nordenia North Scott County Ambulance Notre Dame High School Olive Garden Italian Restaurant Oran R III School District Parkview State School Pizza Hut Plaza Tire Service Proctor & Gamble Paper Products Puxico Elementary School Puxico High School Rapco Horizon Rick Shipman Construction Inc Rubbermaid S & W Cabinets Saint Francis Medical Center Scott City Fire Dept Scott City Senior High School SEMO Ready Mix Inc Sikeston Municipal Water Sikeston Outlet Mall Sikeston Police Dept Sonic Drive -In Southeast Missouri Hospital Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing and Health Sciences Southeast Missouri State University MGT of America, Inc. Page H-2 List of Participating Employers ■ Southeast Missourian ■ Staples ■ Steward Steel Inc ■ Tyson Foods Inc ■ US Post Office ■ Wayne Millington Trucking Co ■ Wehrenberg Theatres Inc ■ Wiese Planning & Engineering ■ Wood & Huston Bank ■ Woodland R Iv School District ■ Workforce Investment Board of Southeast Missouri ■ Zalma R5 School Superintendent MGT of America, Inc. Page H-3 I_1:�:»►�l �]IAVA COMPARISON TO SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI EXPERIENCE APPENDIX I COMPARISON TO SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI EXPERIENCE This appendix is provided as a supplementary comparison between Cape Girardeau and Springfield, Missouri to explore the validity of references to similarities between circumstances in these two areas. Specifically, the conversion of the community technical/vocational center in Springfield to Ozark Technical College was often referenced in stakeholder interviews as a potential model for developing the postsecondary educational infrastructure in Cape Girardeau. These stakeholders expressed sentiment that the development and operation of Ozark Technical College in the home county of Missouri State University in Springfield demonstrated the merits of converting the Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center into a community college to complement the current efforts of Southeast Missouri State University in the community. Included in this section are comparisons of the circumstances and trends in these two regions covering: ■ Population ■ Postsecondary enrollment ■ Educational attainment Comparisons are made between Cape Girardeau and Greene counties, individually, as well as between the broader regions surrounding these two counties. Population Exhibit 1 depicts the populations of Cape Girardeau and the Cape Girardeau Region divided by age. Over the past seventeen years, both Cape Girardeau County and the Cape Girardeau Region have experienced population growth in all categories of populations aged 18 years and over. The single exception to this is among the 25 to 44 year old age range in Cape Girardeau County between the year 2000 and 2007 where the decline was 1.79 percent. In Cape Girardeau County, the population in the 18-24 age group is steadily increasing, showing growth among those individuals most likely to attend college. MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-1 Appendix I EXHIBIT 1 POPULATION BY AGE GROUP IN CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY AND CAPE GIRARDEAU REGION* Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. *The Region includes Cape Girardeau, Bollinger, Scott, and Stoddard Counties. Exhibit 2 depicts the corresponding population segments of Greene County and the surrounding area. Most notably, the population of this area is several times larger than what was observed for Cape Girardeau County and the surrounding area. However, Greene County has experienced declining rates of growth over the past seventeen years. Between 2000 and 2007, the 18 to 24 population grew less than one percent (0.73%) and the overall 18+ population experienced a population increase that was half of the percentage increase between 1990 and 2000 (7.53% and 14.22%, respectively). Between 1990 and 2000, the Springfield Region experienced large growth among all ages above 18 years. MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-2 18 to 24 years 25 to 44 years 18+ years Total population Cape Girardeau County 1990 9,181 18,389 47,004 61,663 2000 9,203 19,067 52,5961 68,693 % of change 0.24% 3.56% 10.63% 10.23% 2007 9,726 18,732 55,908 72,047 % of change 5.38% -1.79% 5.92% 4.66% Cape Girardeau Region 1990 16,224 40,846 104,702 140,523 2000 16,090 41,229 113,423 150,849 % of change -0.83% 0.94% 8.33% 7.35% 2007 --- --- --- --- % of change - Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. *The Region includes Cape Girardeau, Bollinger, Scott, and Stoddard Counties. Exhibit 2 depicts the corresponding population segments of Greene County and the surrounding area. Most notably, the population of this area is several times larger than what was observed for Cape Girardeau County and the surrounding area. However, Greene County has experienced declining rates of growth over the past seventeen years. Between 2000 and 2007, the 18 to 24 population grew less than one percent (0.73%) and the overall 18+ population experienced a population increase that was half of the percentage increase between 1990 and 2000 (7.53% and 14.22%, respectively). Between 1990 and 2000, the Springfield Region experienced large growth among all ages above 18 years. MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-2 Appendix I EXHIBIT 2 POPULATION BY AGE GROUP IN GREENE COUNTY AND SPRINGFIELD REGION Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. *The Region includes Greene, Christian, Dade, Dallas, Lawrence, Polk, Stone, and Webster Counties. Postsecondary Enrollment As described previously, Greene County is home to Missouri State University, while Cape Girardeau County is home to Southeast Missouri State University. Both of these institutions recruit students regionally and have selective enrollment criteria. Exhibit 3 depicts respective enrollment levels of these two institutions over the 1990 through 2007 period. In terms of general capacity, Missouri State University enrolls about twice as many students as Southeast Missouri State. Both institutions saw slow or declining enrollment levels between 1990 and 2000 followed by substantial growth over the 2000 through 2007 period. Southeast Missouri State outpaced the growth of Missouri State University over both periods, expanding by about 33 percent over the entire seventeen- year period, as compared to growth of about 13 percent at Missouri State. It should be noted that Ozark Technical College was founded in 1990. At the time of its founding, Missouri State University was transitioning to more selective enrollment criteria (recruiting from a wider geography and population base) and supported the new technical college's role of serving the more open enrollment market in Greene County. MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-3 18 to 24 years 25 to 44 years 18+ years Total population Greene County 1990 30,719 64,020 160,309 207,949 2000 33,245 68,653 186,8901 240,391 % of change 7.60% 6.75% 14.22% 13.50% 2007 33,469 71,868 202,112 259,450 % of change 0.73% 4.47% 7.53% 7.35% Greene County Region 1990 44,135 105,351 268,982 355,581 2000 48,580 124,325 333,694 440,159 % of change 10.07% 18.01% 24.06% 23.79% 2007 --- --- --- % of change --- --- --- Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. *The Region includes Greene, Christian, Dade, Dallas, Lawrence, Polk, Stone, and Webster Counties. Postsecondary Enrollment As described previously, Greene County is home to Missouri State University, while Cape Girardeau County is home to Southeast Missouri State University. Both of these institutions recruit students regionally and have selective enrollment criteria. Exhibit 3 depicts respective enrollment levels of these two institutions over the 1990 through 2007 period. In terms of general capacity, Missouri State University enrolls about twice as many students as Southeast Missouri State. Both institutions saw slow or declining enrollment levels between 1990 and 2000 followed by substantial growth over the 2000 through 2007 period. Southeast Missouri State outpaced the growth of Missouri State University over both periods, expanding by about 33 percent over the entire seventeen- year period, as compared to growth of about 13 percent at Missouri State. It should be noted that Ozark Technical College was founded in 1990. At the time of its founding, Missouri State University was transitioning to more selective enrollment criteria (recruiting from a wider geography and population base) and supported the new technical college's role of serving the more open enrollment market in Greene County. MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-3 Appendix I EXHIBIT 3 TREND DATA — 1990, 2000, AND 2007 ENROLLMENT BY LEVEL AT MSU AND SOUTHEAST Source: Missouri State University, 2009; Southeast Missouri State University, 2009; IPEDS, 2009 Educational Attainment Educational attainment data (statistics regarding the numbers and proportions of populations attaining various thresholds of education or training) can be useful in demonstrating the efficacy of local providers' efforts to serve their respective communities. Shortfalls in these educational attainment levels may indicate gaps in available opportunities or barriers to access in a community. As depicted in Exhibit 4, in 1990, the proportion of individuals aged 18 years and over in Cape Girardeau that had attained some level of college education (some college or associate degree plus bachelor's degree or higher) was slightly lower than what was observed in Greene County (about 46% versus 50%, respectively). MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-4 Headcount Enrollment by Level Undergraduate Graduate Total Southeast Missouri State Number 1990 8,801 2000 7,760 1,191 8,951 2007 10,611 2,495 13,106 Percent Change 1990-2000 1.7% 2000-2007 36.7% 109.5% 46.4% 1990-2007 32.8% Missouri State University Number 1990 19,480 2000 14,699 3,004 17,703 2007 18,304 4,200 22,504 Percent Change 1990-2000 -9.1% 2000-2007 24.5% 39.8% 27.1% 1990-2007 13.4% Source: Missouri State University, 2009; Southeast Missouri State University, 2009; IPEDS, 2009 Educational Attainment Educational attainment data (statistics regarding the numbers and proportions of populations attaining various thresholds of education or training) can be useful in demonstrating the efficacy of local providers' efforts to serve their respective communities. Shortfalls in these educational attainment levels may indicate gaps in available opportunities or barriers to access in a community. As depicted in Exhibit 4, in 1990, the proportion of individuals aged 18 years and over in Cape Girardeau that had attained some level of college education (some college or associate degree plus bachelor's degree or higher) was slightly lower than what was observed in Greene County (about 46% versus 50%, respectively). MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-4 Appendix I EXHIBIT 4 BENCHMARK DATA — 1990 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT OF 18+ POPULATION Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. Percentages are based on the reported number of graduates. This number is slightly higher than the actual reported population for each county/region. Exhibit 5 presents the trend in these attainment levels over the 1990 through 2007 period. Over the period from 1990 through 2000 and successively from 2000 through 2007, the proportion of individuals attaining some college -level education remained fairly static in Cape Girardeau, increasing from 46 percent in 1990 to about 50 percent by 2000 and slightly higher, to 51 percent, by 2007. Alternately, more pronounced increases were observed in Greene County, as this proportion increased from 50 percent in 1990 to 55 percent in 2000, and upwards to 59 percent by 2007. The primary difference in the changes in attainment levels between the two regions occurred in the category including individuals attaining some college or an associate degree, which increased in Greene County while simultaneously declining in Cape Girardeau County. MGT of America, Inc. Page I-5 Attainment Levels High School Some College Bachelors Less than Graduate High School (incl. or Associates Degree or equivalency) Degree Higher Number Cape Girardeau (n= 46,941) 10,779 14,746 13,533 7,883 Greene County (n= 160,136) 31,585 48,785 50,982 28,784 Percent Cape Girardeau 22.96% 31.41% 28.83% 16.79% Greene County 19.72% 30.46% 31.84% 17.97% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. Percentages are based on the reported number of graduates. This number is slightly higher than the actual reported population for each county/region. Exhibit 5 presents the trend in these attainment levels over the 1990 through 2007 period. Over the period from 1990 through 2000 and successively from 2000 through 2007, the proportion of individuals attaining some college -level education remained fairly static in Cape Girardeau, increasing from 46 percent in 1990 to about 50 percent by 2000 and slightly higher, to 51 percent, by 2007. Alternately, more pronounced increases were observed in Greene County, as this proportion increased from 50 percent in 1990 to 55 percent in 2000, and upwards to 59 percent by 2007. The primary difference in the changes in attainment levels between the two regions occurred in the category including individuals attaining some college or an associate degree, which increased in Greene County while simultaneously declining in Cape Girardeau County. MGT of America, Inc. Page I-5 Appendix I EXHIBIT 5 TREND DATA — 1990, 2000, AND 2007 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT OF 18+ POPULATION Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. MGT of America, Inc. Page I-6 Attainment Levels Less than High School High School Graduate (incl. equivalency) Some College or Associates Degree Bachelors Degree or Higher Cape Girardeau County Number 1990 10,779 14,746 13,533 7,883 2000 9,625 16,659 15,184 11,054 2007 7,412 20,200 15,919 1 12,379 Percent Distribution 1990 22.96% 31.41% 28.83% 16.79% 2000 18.33% 31.72% 28.91% 28.47% 2007 13.26% 36.13% 21.05% 22.14% Percent Change in Distribution 1990-2000 -4.63% 0.31% 0.08% 11.68% 2000-2007 -5.07% 4.41% -7.86% -6.33% 1990-2007 -9.70% 4.72% -7.78% 5.35% Greene County Number 1990 31,585 48,785 50,982 28,784 2000 28,440 54,696 64,080 39,827 2007 23,500 59,404 71,799 47,703 Percent Distribution 1990 19.72% 30.46% 31.84% 17.97% 2000 15.21% 29.24% 34.26% 21.29% 2007 11.61% 29.35% 35.47% 23.57% Percent Change in Distribution 1990-2000 -4.51% -1.22% 2.42% 3.32% 2000-2007 -3.60% 0.11% 1.21% 2.28% 1990-2007 -8.11% -1.11% 3.63% 5.60% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. MGT of America, Inc. Page I-6 Appendix I However, looking specifically at current proportions in the more traditional enrollment age group (individuals aged 18 to 24 years, as depicted in Exhibit 6), we see similar proportions in the category of individuals attaining some college or an associate degree. This may indicate that the overall differences in attainment at this level (observed previously in Exhibit 5) are a function of enrollments by nontraditional students pursuing training opportunities at Ozark Technical College. EXHIBIT 6 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT (2007) EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT PATTERNS YOUNG ADULT POPULATION SUBGROUPS Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. Exhibit 7 and Exhibit 8, below, depict accompanying data for the regions surrounding Cape Girardeau and Greene counties for 1990 and 2000 (most current data available) along with the data depicted previously. The shortfall noted previously regarding attainment of some college or associate degrees in Cape Girardeau County versus Greene County is also apparent for these outlying regions for the respective areas. MGT of America, Inc. Page I-7 Age Groupings 18-24 High School Some College Bachelors Less than High Graduate or Associate Degree or School (incl. Degree Higher equivalency) Number Cape Girardeau (n= 9,717) 593 2,915 5,675 534 Greene County (n= 33,484) 3,081 8,103 19,823 2,478 Percent Cape Girardeau 1.06% 5.21% 10.15% 0.96% Greene County 1.52% 4.01% 9.81 % 1.23% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. Exhibit 7 and Exhibit 8, below, depict accompanying data for the regions surrounding Cape Girardeau and Greene counties for 1990 and 2000 (most current data available) along with the data depicted previously. The shortfall noted previously regarding attainment of some college or associate degrees in Cape Girardeau County versus Greene County is also apparent for these outlying regions for the respective areas. MGT of America, Inc. Page I-7 Appendix I EXHIBIT 7 TREND DATA - 1990, 2000, AND 2007 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT OF CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY AND CAPE GIRARDEAU REGION OF 18+ POPULATION Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. Percentages are based on the reported number of graduates. This number is slightly higher than the actual reported population for each county/region. MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-8 Cape Girardeau County Cape Girardeau Region EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT % of 18+ 1990 % of 18+ 2000 % of 18+ 2007 % of 18+ 1990 % of 18+ 2000 (highest level) 1990 Population 2000 Population 2007' Population 1990 Population 2000 Population Population 18 years and over 46,941 100.00% 52,522 100.00% 55,910 100.00% 53,773 100.00% 110,525 100.00% Less than high school graduate 10,779 22.96% 9,625 18.33% 7,412 13.26% 19,333 35.95% 32,996 29.85% High school graduate (incl. equivalency) 14,746 31.41% 16,659 31.72% 20,200 36.13%0 18,212 33.87 /0 41,097 0 37.18 /o Some college or associate degree 13,533 28.83% 15,184 28.91% 15,919 28.47% 12,143 22.58% 25,6551 23.21% Bachelor's degree or higher 7,883 16.79% 11,054 21.05% 12,379 22.14% 4,085 7.60% 10,777 9.75% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. Percentages are based on the reported number of graduates. This number is slightly higher than the actual reported population for each county/region. MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-8 Appendix I EXHIBIT 8 TREND DATA - 1990, 2000, AND 2007 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT OF GREENE COUNTY AND GREENE COUNTY REGION OF 18+ POPULATION Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. Percentages are based on the reported number of graduates. This number is slightly higher than the actual reported population for each county/region. MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-9 Greene County Greene County Region EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (highest level) 1990 % of 18+ 2000 2000 % of 18+ 2000 2007* % of 18+ 2007 1990 % of 18+ 2000 2000 % of 18+ 2000 Population Population Population Population Population Population 18 years and over 160,136 100.00% 187,043 100.00% 202,405 100.00% 38,329 100.00% 146,867 100.00% Less than high school graduate 31,585 19.72% 28,440 15.21% 23,500 11.61% 10,568 27.57% 31,376 21.36% High school graduate 48,785 30.46% (incl. equivalency) 54,696 29.24% 59,404 29.35% 15,732 41.04% 56,550 38.50% Some college or associate degree 50,982 31.84% 64,080 34.26% 71,799 35.47% 8,297 21.65% 39,119 26.64% Bachelor's degree or higher 28,784 17.97% 39,827 o 21.29% 47,703 0 23.57 /0 3,732 o 9.74% 19,822 13.50% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. Percentages are based on the reported number of graduates. This number is slightly higher than the actual reported population for each county/region. MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-9 Appendix I Exhibit 9, Exhibit 10, and Exhibit 11, included in succession below, depict graphical representations of these varying attainment levels in Cape Girardeau and Greene counties in 1990, 2000, and 2007, respectively. EXHIBIT 9 GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF ATTAINMENT LEVELS IN CAPE GIRARDEAU AND GREENE COUNTIES, 1990 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Educational Attainment of Cape Girardeau County and Greene County -1990 31.41% 31.84% Less than high school High school graduate Some college or Bachelor's degree or graduate (incl. equivalency) associate degree higher 1990 Cape Girardeau County ■ 1990 Greene County Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. MGT of America, Inc. Page 1-10 Appendix I EXHIBIT 10 GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF ATTAINMENT LEVELS IN CAPE GIRARDEAU AND GREENE COUNTIES, 2000 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% M00% 5.00% 0.00% Educational Attainment of Cape Girardeau County and Greene County - 2000 34.26% Less than high school High school graduate Some college or Bachelor's degree or graduate (incl. equivalency) associate degree higher • 2000 Cape Girardeau County 2000 Greene County Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. EXHIBIT 11 GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF ATTAINMENT LEVELS IN CAPE GIRARDEAU AND GREENE COUNTIES, 2007 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Educational Attainment of Cape Girardeau County and Greene County - 2007 36.13% 35.47% Less than high High school school graduate graduate (incl. equivalency) ■ 2007 Cape Girardeau County Source: US Census, 2009 22.149Y. 23.57% _f .. Some college or Bachelor's degree or associate degree higher ■ 2007 Greene County MGT of America, Inc. Page b11 APPENDIX J: DETAILED OCCUPATIONAL PROJECTIONS APPENDIX J DETAILED OCCUPATIONAL PROJECTIONS This appendix details occupational projections and other data published by the Missouri Economic Research and Information Center (MERIC) covering all sectors that generally require postsecondary education or training. The data are based on 2004 estimates and project over the next ten years (through 2014) and sorted by occupational area, according to Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) coding system. It should be noted that the basis on historical data entails that the figures do not account for the more recent economic downturn and, therefore, should be viewed as high-end scenarios in most or all cases. Notes and explanations regarding these tables appear below. Notes and Legend 1. ND = Non -disclosed and suppressed due to confidentiality agreement with the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. NA = Data not available. 2. Numeric employment change is the difference in the number of jobs between the base and projected years. 3. Percent employment change indicates how fast employment is expected to increase or decrease during the projection period. 4. Growth openings or new jobs are the numeric change in employment over the projection period. The difference of this to numeric employment change is it only carries positive numbers or zero. If this numeric employment change is a negative number, this value converts to zero. 5. Replacement openings are an estimate of the number of jobs that will arise from the need to replace workers who will die, retire, or otherwise permanently leave the occupation. 6. Total openings are the sum of growth openings and replacements. Occupations with declining employment will have openings equal to replacement needs. 7. Average annual growth openings or new jobs are the numeric change in employment over the projection period divided by the number of years in the projection period. 8. Average annual replacement openings are an estimate of the number of jobs that will arise from the need to replace workers who will die, retire, or otherwise permanently leave the occupation. To provide an annual average, the estimate is divided by the number of years in the projection period. 9. Average total annual openings are the sum of average annual new jobs and replacements divided by the number of years in the projection period. Occupations with declining employment will have average annual openings equal to replacement needs. Average annual openings are presented because job openings arise from both newly created jobs and the need to replace workers who permanently leave their jobs. MGT of America, Inc. Page J-1 Appendix J EXHIBIT 1 JOBS GENERALLY REQUIRING ASSOCIATE DEGREE OR POSTSECONDARY VOCATIONAL TRAINING Top 10 Growth by Lvl. Occupational Grade Code _ Title Employment 2004 2014 Estimated Projected Change 2004-2014 Net Percent Annual Wages 2004 Openings 2004-2014 Annual Openings Mean I Entry I Exp'd lGrowthl Replc. I Total I Growthl Replc. I Total x x C A- A- B- D- D- C B- C D- D- B C B D F+ F+ C B- D- A- A- D- B F+ B- D+ D- A+ B A- B+ A- B B 11-9061 13-2021 15-1041 15-1099 17-3011 17-3012 17-3013 17-3019 17-3022 17-3023 17-3024 17-3025 17-3026 17-3027 _ 17-3029 19-4011 19-4021 19-4031 19-4091 19-4093 19-4099 23-2011 23-2091 25-2011 25-4031 27-1025 27-4012 27-4014 29-1111 29-1124 29-1126 29-2012 29-2021 29-2031 29-2032 Funeral Directors Appraisers & Assessors of Real Estate _ Computer Support Specialists Computer Specialists, All Other Architectural & Civil Drafters Electrical & Electronics Drafters ND 180 _ 250 _ 20 30 20 ND 220 290 20 30 20 -2 43 45 1 -1 -2 ND 24.16 18.37 5.00 -3.85 -9.09 4.76 ND ND $39,290 $35,200 $52,060 $35,610 $43,350 $41,680 $23,470 ND $40,210 $43,470 $42,550 $38,620 $42,361) $49,520 ND ND $35,860 ND $38,250 ND $37,170 $35,360 $20,850 $22,020 ND $31,020 $39,240 $44,820 $56,180 ND $26,880 $51,190 $38,380 $40,700 $50,710 $39,150 $21,600 $27,680 $26,440 ND $27,170 ND $22,600 ND $47,630 ND 43 ND 38 30 2 56 81 75 3 ND 4 5 0 ND 4 3 0 6 8 8 0 $24,360 NA $29,410 $27,020 $30,720 $12,620 ND $29,930 NA NA $29,420 $40,620 45 NA 1 $38,700 _ 0 $51,510 0 $47,160 i 1 $28,890 ND ND ND $45,350 _ 1 NA ND NA NO $43,220 5 7 7 0 1 6 6 0 1 6 7 0 1 ND 4 ND ND ND 11 ND ND 17 18 0 2 ND 1 I ND ND ND 2 ND ND 12 17 1 11 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 Mechanical Drafters 20 20 1 Drafters, All Other ND ND 3 Civil En ineerin Technicians ND ND 3 ND 1.22 Electrical & Electronic Engineering Technicians 80 80 1 Electra -Mechanical Technicians ND ND -1 Environmental Engineering Technicians ND ND 1 Industrial Engineering Technicians 60 60 5 Mechanical Engineering Technicians ND ND 3 Engineering Technicians, Except Drafters, All Other 20 20 0 Agricultural & Food Science Technicians ND ND 0 Biological Technicians ND ND 0 Chemical Technicians i ND ND 1 Environmental Science & Protection Technicians, Incl ND ND 1 ND ND 8.93 ND 0.00 ND ND NA $37,290 ND ND $24,190 ND NA ND $55,630 0 ND ND ND ND $41,700 _ND ND ND $41,660 0 ND ND $44,420 _ 17 NA ND $23,720 193 $25,680 2 ND �ND $38,600 2 NA �ND $50,650 795 NA ND ND ND $31,140 45 $55,450 ND $47,430 6 $48,330 5 $55,780 6 $44,240 45 $25,520 90 $30,730 1 $29,610 42 ND ND $29,700 158 ND 5 ND ND 1 41 4 0 0 0 ND 3 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND 31 ND ND ND 2 ND ND 0 0 0 0 ND ND -14.29 ND 25.37 ND 33.92 _7.69 _ND _7.14 ND 2_8.27 ND ND 23.44 ND 27.27 23.81 27.27 21.33 18.56 1.22 31.11 ND 12.31 Forest & Conservation Technicians 50 40 -7 Life, Physical, & Social Science Technicians, All Othe ND ND 34 Paralegals & Legal Assistants 70 80 17 Court Reporters ND ND -1 Preschool Teachers, Except Special Education 570 760 193 Library Technicians 30 30 2 Interior Designers ND ND 1 Broadcast Technicians 30 30 2 Sound Engineering Technicians ND ND 0 Registered Nurses 2 810 3,610 795 Radiation Therapists NDI ND 1 Respiratory Therapists ND ND 28 Medical & Clinical Laborato Technicians 190 240 45 $31,440 ND $22,670 NA 12 12 0 1 1 ND 44 NDI NDI 4 5 22 2 1 2 ND 1 ND ND 0 $15,110 $14,710 ND $15,860 NA $33,170 NA ND $18,360 $42,680 $20,280 $25,420 $40,590 68 261 19 7 26 10 12 0 1 1 ND 2 ND ND 0 7 9 0 1 1 ND 2 ND ND 588 1383 801 59 ND 1 ND ND ND 65 ND ND 52 97 5 5 ND 36 ND ND 0 138 0 7 10 4 Dental Hygienists ND ND 30 Cardiovascular Technologists & Technicians 20 30 6 Diagnostic Medical Sonographers 20 30 5 Nuclear Medicine Technologists 20 30 6 Radiologic Technologists & Technicians 210 260 45 Emergency Medical Technicians & Paramedics 490 580 90 RespiratoryTherapy Technicians 80 80 1 Surgical Technologists 140 18o _ 42 Veterinary Technologists & Technicians ND ND 1 Licensed Practical & Licensed Vocational Nurses 1,280 1,440 158 4 10 1 01 1 4 9 1 0 1 B 29-2033 4 10 1 0 1 A- 29-2034 x B 29-2041 F+ 29-2054 B+ 29-2055 C 29-2056 x B+ 29-2061 $28,950 $13,740 $21,560 $20,100 ND $22,120 39 84 5 4 8 56 146 9 6 11 12 0 1 18 60 4 2 ND 2 ND ND 280 438 161 281 15 1 6 0 44 Source: Missouri Economic Research and Information Center, 2004 through 2014 Occupational Projections. MGT of America, Inc. Page J-2 Appendix J EXHIBIT 1 (Continued) JOBS GENERALLY REQUIRING ASSOCIATE DEGREE OR POSTSECONDARY VOCATIONAL TRAINING Top 10 Growth by Lvl. Occupational Grade Code Title Employment 2004 2014 Estimated Projected Change 2004-2014 Net Percent Annual Wages 2004 Openings 2004-2014 Annual Openings Mean Entry Exp'd Growth Relc.pTotal lGrowthl Replc. I Total X B- B-' 29-2071 29-2099 29-9012 Medical Records & Health Information Technicians Health Technologists & Technicians, All Other Occupational Health & SafetyTechnicians 270 ND ND _350 ND ND 76 7 2 27.94 _ND ND $20,280 ND $25,520 $15,680 ND $17,610 $22,580 IN $29,480 _ 76 ND ND 39 ND ND 115 10 4 8 ND ND _ 4 _ ND ND 12 1 0 C B 29-9099 31-1012 31-2011 31-2021 31-9011 31-9094 33-3031 39-1012 39-3011 39-4011 39-5012 39-5092 39-5094 Healthcare Practitioners & Technical Workers, All Ot Nursing Aides, Orderlies, & Attendants Occupational Therapist Assistants Physical Therapist Assistants Massage Therapists Medical Transcriptionists Fish & Game Wardens Slot Key Persons_ Gaming Dealers Embalmers Hairdressers, Hairstylists, & Cosmetologists Manicurists &Pedicurists Skin Care Specialists ND 3,560 ND ND ND 130 20 ND ND ND 5901 ND ND ND 4,230 ND NDI ND 160 20 ND ND ND 630 ND ND 12 665 5 15 3 29 1 0 -2 1 461 01 01 ND 18.66 ND NDI ND 22.31 4.55 ND ND ND 7.82 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 18 ND ND 2 113 1 2 1 5 1 0 2 0 16 0 0 X B $16,410 $13,540 $17,840 665 467 1,132 67 47 B ND ND ND ND ND 7 ND ND A- ND NDI ND ND ND 24 ND ND D- ND ND NDI ND ND 6 ND ND B+ $23,700 $18,940 $26,0801 29 24 53 3 2 C ND ND ND 1 6 7 0 1 F+ $29 430 NA NA ND ND 3 ND ND F+ $20,280 NA NA ND ND 23 ND ND D+ ND ND $14,000 NA NA ND_ $21,740 NA NA ND ND 3 ND ND x C $19,160 $21,570 $22,890 461 113 159 5 11 F ND ND 0 NDND F+ NDI NDI 1 ND ND B+ 39-9031 41-3041 41-9022 43-6012 43-6013 43-9031 49-2011 49-2021 49-2091 49-2092 49-2093 49-2094 49-2095 49-2096 49-2097 49-2098 49-3011 49-3023 49-3031 49-3041 49-3042 49-9062 51-5022 51-9071 53-2012 53-5031 Fitness Trainers & Aerobics Instructors Travel Agents Real Estate Sales Agents Legal Secretaries Medical Secretaries Desktop Publishers Computer, Automated Teller,_ & Office Machine Repel Radio Mechanics Avionics Technicians Electric Motor, Power Tool, & Related Repairers ND ND ND 130 480 20 230 ND ND 50 ND ND ND 140 5501 20 250 ND ND 50 19 1 11 14 69 0 191 0 0 -3 ND ND ND 11.20 14.50 0.00 8.15 ND ND -6.12 ND ND $58,220 $27,070 $20,350 $23,120 $32,720 $28,960 ND $27,800 $31,040 $34,330 $56,020 $33,150 $31,460 ND ND $27,180 $29 110 ND $32,320 $33,340 $20,220 $33,700 ND NDI ND ND ND NA $30,490 _ $22,500 $26,630 $35,400 NA ND $32,320 $34,660 $39,890 $61,360 $35,680 NA ND ND $30,900 $32,430 ND $35,410 $39,570 $21,690 $41,090 ND ND ND ND 33 ND ND 3 0 3 4 16 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 6 38 16 0 10 2 1 1 0 3 D- A- C ND NA $20,240 $16,050 $16,110 $27,360 NA ND $18,780 $23,790 $23,220 $45,350 $28,090 ND ND 3 ND ND ND ND 26 ND ND 14 24 38 1 2 x IB 69 91 160 7 9 F+ 0 4 4 01 0 C 19 28 47 2 3 ND ND 0 ND ND ND ND 0 ND ND 0 12 12 0 1 ND ND 5 ND ND 0 16 16 0 2 ND ND 2 ND ND ND ND 17 NDI ND F+ D F+ D+ D- D F+ F+ B- B+ x B+ x A- D+ B+ C F D+ D A- Electrical & Electronics Installers & Repairers, Transp ND ND 1 ND Electrical & Electronics Repairers, Commercial & IndL 80 70 -3 4.00 Electrical & Electronics Repairers, Powerhouse, Subs ND ND 0 ND Electronic Equipment Installers & Repairers, Motor VE ND NDI 2 ND Electronic Home Entertainment Equipment Installers ND ND -3 ND Security & Fire Alarm Systems Installers ND ND 3 ND Aircraft Mechanics & Service Technicians ND ND 17 ND Automotive Service Technicians & Mechanics 980 1,100 117 11.96 Bus & Truck Mechanics & Diesel Engine Specialists 390 450 58 14.83 Farm Equipment Mechanics ND ND 1 ND Mobile Heavy Equipment Mechanics, Except Engines 280 320 37 13.12 Medical Equipment Repairers 30 40 6 18.18 Prepress Technicians & Workers 50 40 -10 -20.00 Jewelers & Precious Stone & Metal Workers 50 50 2 4.08 Commercial Pilots ND ND 0 ND IShip Engineers ND ND 12 NDI NA ND NDI 2 ND ND ND ND ND 4 ND ND ND ND 56 ND ND 117 260 377 12 26 _ 58 101 159_ 6 10 ND ND 3 ND ND 37 61 98 4 6 6 9 15 11 1 0 121 12 0 1 ND $19,760 $22,460 ND $26,150 $20,870 $17,280 $18,920 ND ND 210 12 0 1 ND 2 ND ND _ND ND ND 26 ND ND Source: Missouri Economic Research and Information Center, 2004 through 2014 Occupational Projections. MGT of America, Inc. Page J-3 Appendix J EXHIBIT 2 JOBS GENERALLY REQUIRING BACHELOR'S DEGREE OR BACHELOR'S DEGREE PLUS WORK EXPERIENCE Top 10 Growth by Lvl. Occupational 1 Employment Change I Annual Wages Openings 2004 2014 2004-2014 2004 2004-2014 Annual O enin s Grade I Code I Title Estimated Projected I Net lPercentl Mean I Entry I Exp'd lGrowthl Replc. I Total lGrowthl Replc. I Total x A- 11-1011 Chief Executives 590 650 63 10.77 $106,880 $47,250 $136,690 63 110 173 6 11 17 x A- 11-1021 General & Operations Managers 1,410 1,590 183 13.02 $74,970 $40,270 $92,320 183 265 _ 448 18 27 45 _ D 1 1 -1031 Legislators 30 30 -1 -3.33 $74,820 $23,460 $100,500 0 4 _ 4 0 0 0 B 11-2011 Advertising & Promotions Managers 50 60 8 16.67 $68,360 $43,070 $81,010 8 9 _ 17 1 1 2 A- 11-2021 Marketing Managers 70 80 14 21.21 $72,540 $47,490 $85,070 14 12 _ 26 1 1 3 A- 11-2022 Sales Managers 170 200 31 18.45 $83,470 $39,440 $105,480 31 31 _ 62 3 3 6 _ B- 11-2031 Public Relations Managers 20 30 3 13.04 $47,810 $38,230 $52,600 3 4 _ 7 0 0 1 B+ 11-3011 Administrative Services Managers 120 130 15 12.82 $50,520 $31,760 $59,890 15 23 _ 38 2 2 4 A- 11-3021 Computer & Information Systems Managers 100 130 26 25.74 $68,250 $46,700 $79,030 26 18 _ 44 3 2 4 B+ 11-3031 Financial Managers 200 220 23 11.44 $69,370 $45,550 $81,270 23 29 _ 52 2 3 5 _ B- 11-3041 Compensation & Benefits Managers 40 50 5 12.50 $71,940 $37,820 $89,000 5 7 _ 12 1 1 1 B 11-3042 Training & Development Managers 20 20 3 17.65 $55,040 $39,310 $62,910 3 3 _ 6 0 0 1 B- 11-3049 Human Resources Managers, All Other 20 30 3 13.04 $61,440 $45,700 $69,310 3 4 _ 7 0 0 1 B- 11-3061 Purchasing Managers 40 50 5 12.50 $70,370 $45,210 $82,940 5 9 _ 14 1 1 1 C 11-9011 Farm, Ranch, & Other Agricultural Managers _ ND ND -38 ND $52,380 NA NA ND ND _ 43 ND ND 4 B- 11-9021 Construction Managers _ 230 230 2 0.87 $102,300 $46,140 $130,380 2 42 _ 44 0 4 4 B 11-9031 Education Administrators, Preschool & Child Care Ce _ ND ND 4 ND $36,340 $34,700 $37,160 ND ND _ 11 ND ND 1 B- 11-9032 Education Administrators, Elementary & Secondary S 260 260 2 0.76 $61,630 $51,300 $66,800 2 65 _ 67 0 7 7 B- 11-9033 Education Administrators, Postsecondary ND ND 3 ND ND ND ND ND ND _ 10 ND ND 1 D 11-9039 Education Administrators, All Other ND ND 0 ND $63,770 NA NA ND ND _ 1 ND ND 0 B- 11-9041 Engineering Managers 60 60 5 9.09 $78,980 $60,770 $88,090 5 11 _ 16 1 1 2 A- 11-9111 Medical & Health Services Managers 250 290 40 16.06 $62,720 $43,780 $72,180 40 49 _ 89 4 5 9 D 11-9121 Natural Sciences Managers ND ND -2 ND ND ND ND ND ND _ 2 ND ND 0 D 11-9141 Property, Real Estate, & Community Association Man ND ND 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND _ 7 ND ND 1 A- 11-9151 Social & Community Service Managers 130 150 19 14.96 $38,730 $29,120 $43,530 19 24 _ 43 2 2 4 D- 13-1011 Agents & Business Managers of Artists, Performers, ND ND 0 ND $45,010 NA NA ND ND _ 1 ND ND 0 x A- 13-1071 Employment, Recruitment, & Placement Specialists 250 350 105 42.34 $26,970 $20,190 $30,360 105 38 _ 143 11 4 14 A- 13-1072 Compensation, Benefits, & Job Analysis Specialists 80 90 15 19.48 $40,090 $25,910 $47,180 15 12 _ 27 2 1 3 B+ 13-1073 Training & Development Specialists 140 180 37 26.06 $31,940 $18,340 $38,740 37 22 _ 59 4 2 6 A- 13-1079 Human Resources, Training, & Labor Relations Sped 70 90 19 27.14 $39,440 $27,150 $45,590 19 12 _ 31 _ 2 1 3 D 13-1081 Logisticians 20 20 0 0.00 $61,370 $44,110 $69,990 0 3 3 0 0 0 B+ 13-1111 Management Analysts 160 180 18 10.98 $43,390 $25,790 $52,180 18 22 40 2 2 4 _ D+ 13-1121 Meeting & Convention Planners ND ND 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND _ 6 ND ND 1 A- 13-1199 Business Operations Specialists, All Other 190 220 29 15.43 $38,670 $23,700 $46,150 29 32 _ 61 3 3 6 x A 13-2011 Accountants & Auditors 700 850 152 21.75 $45,140 $26,980 $54,220 152 132 _ 284 15 13 28 B 13-2031 Budget Analysts _ ND ND 7 ND ND ND ND ND ND _ 10 ND ND 1 D- 13-2041 Credit Analysts ND ND -2 ND ND ND ND ND ND _ 4 ND ND 0 B 13-2051 Financial Analysts 50 60 10 19.61 $72,560 $36,990 $90,340 10 8 _ 18 1 12 A- 13-2052 Personal Financial Advisors 90 130 44 48.89 $93,770 $23,940 $128,680 44 12 _ 56 4 1 6 B 13-2053 Insurance Underwriters ND ND 10 ND ND ND ND ND ND _ 19 ND ND 2 B 13-2061 Financial Examiners ND ND 4 ND $73,150 NA NA ND ND _ 9 ND ND 1 D+ 13-2071 _ Loan Counselors ND NO 2 ND ND ND NO ND ND _ 5 ND ND 1 Source: Missouri Economic Research and Information Center, 2004 through 2014 Occupational Projections. MGT of America, Inc. Page J-4 Appendix J EXHIBIT 2 (Continued) JOBS GENERALLY REQUIRING BACHELOR'S DEGREE OR BACHELOR'S DEGREE PLUS WORK EXPERIENCE Top 10 Growth Occupational by Lvl. Grade Code Title Employment 2004 2014 Estimated Projected Change 2004-2014 Net Percent Annual Wages 2004 Openings 2004-2014 Annual Openings Mean Entry Exp'd Growth Rlc.epTotal lGrowthl Replc. I Total 113+ D+ B13-2099 13-2072 13-2081 Loan Officers Tax Examiners, Collectors, & Revenue Agents Financial Specialists, All Other 300 60 20 320 60 30 22 7 6 7.43 12.28 28.57 -1.32 33.75 24.19 24.34 36.11 28.97 36.76 ND ND $45,810 $29,660 $30,010 $49,770 $52,530 $65,150 $49,250 $38,840 $43,490 $50,620 ND ND $51,600 ND $22,850 $16,460 $17,260 $25,070 $40,820 $60,100 $39,580 $28,210 $30,520 $34,830 ND ND NA ND $57,290 $36,250 $36,390 $62,120 $58,390 $67,680 $54,090 $44,150 $49,980 $58,520 ND ND NA 22 7 6 0 27 15 37 13 48 13 4 70 20 10 2 1 1 5 1' 0 7 2 1 B- 15-1021 Computer Programmers 150 150 -2 Computer Software Engineers, Applications 80 110 27 Computer Software Engineers, Systems Software 60 80 15 lComputer Systems Analysts 150 190 37 Database Administrators 401 50 13 36 36 0 4 4 A- 15-1031 8 35 3 1 4 A- 15-1032 6 21 2 1 2 A- 15-1051 17 54 4 2 5 B 15-1061 4 17 11 0 2 A- 15-1071 Network & Computer Systems Administrators 150 190 42 42 16 8 ND ND ND NDI ND ND ND ND ND 13 58 33 9 1 0 4 5 1 1 1 1 16 4 3 ND ND ND ND NDI ND ND ND ND 0 2 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 6 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 A- 15-1081 B 15-2011 D 17-1011 Network Systems & Data Communications Analysts 70 90 25 25 Actuaries ND ND 4 ND Architects, Except Landscape & Naval ND ND 0 ND D 17-1012 Landscape Architects ND ND 0 ND ND C 17-1021 C 17-1022 D 17-2011 Cartographers & Photogrammetrists ND ND 1 ND ND ND ND Surveyors NDI ND 11 NDI ND ND ND Aerospace Engineers ND ND 0 ND ND ND ND ND B 17-2021 Agricultural Engineers ND ND 1 Biomedical Engineers ND ND 1 Chemical Engineers ND ND 0 Civil Engineers 80 90 3 ND ND ND ND NA ND $69,810 _NA $69820 _ ND $63,100 ND $63,120 NA $68,880 $62,050 $51,890 ND NA ND ND NA NA $60,330 NA NA $65,460 ND NA ND B 17-2031 D 17-2041 D 17-2051 D 17-2061 B- 17-2071 D 17-2072 B 17-2081 D- 17-2111 A- 17-2112 D 17-2121 B- 17-2131 B+ 17-2141 ND $72,520 NA ND ND $63,030 $49,470 $73,250 NA $59,690 $39,440 ND ND $55,340 $39,840 ND ND $55,400 $39,970 $63,960 NA $60,950 $45,080 $54,160 $38,380 $47,800 $39,640 ND ND $64,220 NA ND ND ND ND $45,090 NA $56,320 NA $52,100 $35,640 $47,210 NA $71,900 NA NO ND NO 3.57 ND 7.02 ND 26.32 ND 17.74 ND 12.00 6.35 ND _ND ND ND ND 0.00 ND -16.67 ND ND 13.33 ND ND 3 Computer Hardware Engineers ND ND -1 Electrical Engineers 60 60 4 Electronics Engineers, Except Computer ND ND -1 Environmental Engineers 20 20 5 Health & Safes Engineers, Except Minin Safe En ND ND 0 Industrial Engineers 190 220 33 ND ND 0 ND ND 0 4 ND ! 5 ND 33 ND 3 8 11 151 0 1 2 ND 7 ND ND 1 3 8 1 0 1 ND 6 ND ND 1 45 78 3 5 8 Marine Engineers & Naval Architects ND ND 0 Materials Engineers 30 30 3 Mechanical Engineers 130 130 8 Kinin & Geological Engineers, Including Mining Safe ND NO 2 Petroleum Engineers ND ND 1 Engineers, All Other ND ND 0 Food Scientists & Technologists ND ND 2 Soil & Plant Scientists ND ND -1 ND 0 ND ND 0 7 10 0 1 1 34 42 1 3 4 B- 17-2151 ND ND 71 ND ND 1 B 17-2171 D 17-2199 B 19-1012 D 19-1013 D- 19-1023 D 19-1029 D 19-1031 D 19-1032 D 19-2021 ND ND 2 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND 4 ND ND ND 1 ND ND 8 8 0 1 ND 1 ND ND 9 9 0 1 ND 71 ND ND ND 0i ND ND 5 7 0 1 ND 26 ND _ ND ND 1 ND ND 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 NO ND ND Zoologists & Wildlife Biologists 30 30 0 0 ND _ 0 ND ND 2 ND Biological Scientists, All Other NDI ND -1 Conservation Scientists 30 30 -5 Foresters ND ND 0 Atmospheric & Space Scientists ND ND 0 Chemists 20 20 2 Market Research Analysts ND ND 8 Survey Researchers ND ND 1 B 19-2031 B+ 19-3021 B- 19-3022 $53,590 $29,850 ND J_ND $29,550 NA ND Source: Missouri Economic Research and Information Center, 2004 through 2014 Occupational Projections. MGT of America, Inc. Page J-5 Appendix J EXHIBIT 2 (Continued) JOBS GENERALLY REQUIRING BACHELOR'S DEGREE OR BACHELOR'S DEGREE PLUS WORK EXPERIENCE Top 10 Employment Change Annual Wages Openings Growth Occupational 2004 2014 2004-2014 2004 2004-2014 Annual Openings by Lvl. Grade Code Title Estimated Projected Net Percent Mean Entry Exp'd Growth Relc.p Total lGrowthl Replc. I Total x A-21-1021 Child, Family, & School Social Workers 540 640 97 17.96 $29,460 $19,490 $34,450 97 92 189 10 9 19 A- -12 1-1 022 Medical & Public Health Social Workers ND ND 41 ND ND ND ND ND _ ND 73 ND ND 7 B21-1029 Social Workers, All Other ND ND 1 ND $39,230 NA NA ND ND 2 ND ND 0 C 21-1092 Probation Officers & Correctional Treatment Specialis 230 240 17 7.52 $31,500 NA 6 NA 17 40 57 2 4 A- 21-1099 Community & Social Service Specialists, All Other Directors, Religious Activities & Education 100 130 120 140 23 8 23.71 6.20 $34,780 $35,640 $40,180 NA 4 2 $23.970 NA 23 18 41 2 2 B+ 21-2021 8 14 22 1 1 F+ 21-2099 Religious Workers, All Other ND ND -3 ND ND ND ND ND ND 131 ND NDI 1 ND ND 0 ND ND D 23-1021 Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, ND NO 0 ND & Hearin $79,630 NA NA 0 D 23-1022 $51,600 $58,820 NA $41,650 NA $67,410 0 1 Arbitrators, Mediators, & Conciliators ND ND 0 ND ND ND 0 ND ND B- 23-1023 Judges, Magistrate Judges, & Magistrates 20 30 2 8.70 2 3 5 0 0 F+ 23-2092 Law Clerks ND ND -1 ND $22,650 $16,560 $25,700 0 ND ND 1 ND ND D- 23-2099 Le a9 1 Support Workers, All Other 20 10 -2 -12.50 $37,870 $26,980 $43,320 0 0 2 2 0 0 A- 25-1191 Graduate Teaching Assistants ND ND 31 ND ND ND ND ND ND 72 ND ND 7 B 25-1194 Vocational Education Teachers, Postsecondary 40 40 61 17.14 1 $36,790 $25,790 $42,290 6 8 14 1 1 B+ 25-2012 Kindergarten Teachers, Except Special Education 180 190 12 6.78 $34,800 $25,910 $39,240 12 21 33 1 2 3 x B+ 25-2021 Elementary School Teachers, Except Special Educati 1,640 1,700 66 4.03 $33,310 $24,710 $37,610 66 361 427 7 36 43 x B 25-2022 Middle School Teachers, Except Special & Vocational 560 560 -4 -0.71 $35,060 $25,140 $40,020 0 124 124 0 12 12 D- 25-2023 Vocational Education Teachers, Middle School ND ND 0 ND $40,470 NA NA ND ND 4 ND ND 0 x B 25-2031 Secondary School Teachers, Except Special & Vocati 1,640 1,660 26 1.59 $36,990 $27,060 $41,950 26 460 486 3 46 49 C 25-2032 Vocational Education Teachers, Secondary School 200 200 3 1.49 $37,890 $29,980 $41,850 3 57 60 0 6 6 A- 25-2041 Special Education Teachers, Preschool, Kindergarten 260 300 35 13.41 $36,090 $27,620 $40,320 35 62 97 4 6 10 B+ 25-2042 Special Education Teachers, Middle School 120 130 131 11.02 $35,050 $26,360 $39,390 13 28 41 1 3 4 x B+ 25-2043 Special Education Teachers, Secondary School 3301 350 24 7.29 $35,600 $29,750 $38,530 24 78 102 2 8 10 C 25-3011 Adult Literacy, Remedial Education, & GED Teachers 180 190 9 4.92 $31,130 $26,490 $33,450 9 23 32 1 2 3 B+ 25-3099 Teachers & Instructors, All Other INIDI ND 62 ND $22,160 $18,960 $23,770 ND ND 148 ND ND 15 D- 27-1011 Art Directors Multi -Media Artists & Animators 40 ND 40 ND -3 0 -6.98 ND $39,590 $42,470 $34,280 NA $42,250 NA 0 9 9 0 11 1 1 D- 27-1014 ND ND 6 NDl ND D- _ 27-1021 Commercial & Industrial Designers 20 20 0 0.00 $37,350 $28,820 $41,610 0 0 3 3 0 0 F+ 27-1024 Graphic Designers 110 110 01 0.00 $24,570 $18,730 $27,490 0 15 15 0 2 2 B 27-1029 Desi ners, All Other. ND ND 1 ND $53,790 0 NA NA ND ND 1 ND ND C 27-2012 Producers & Directors 40 40 4 10.81 $35,770 1 $21,460 $42,920 4 6 10 0 1 ND ND 16 ND ND F+ 27-2041 Music Directors & Composers ND ND -5 ND ND ND ND 2 B- 27-3021 Broadcast News Analysts INIDI ND 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND 3 ND ND 0 F 27-3022 Reporters & Correspondents ND ND -1 ND ND $37,530 $25,730 ND $23,480 $17,340 ND $44,560 $29,920 ND _ 16 0 ND 20 29 11 36 29 ND 2 0 ND 2 3 1 4 3 B+ 27-3031 Public Relations Specialists 140 150 16 11.68 Editors 120 110 -11 -9.32 D+ 27-3041 Technical Writers ND NDI 2 B 27-3042 ND ND ND _ ND 5 ND ND 1 D+ 27-3043 Writers & Authors 170 180 6 _ND 3.45 $25,690 $17,620 $29,720 _ND 6 30 36 1 3 4 B 27-4032 Film & Video Editors Dietitians & Nutritionists_ ND 60 ND 70 2 5 ND 8.06 $47,100 $33,210 NA $20,100 NA $39,760 ND ND 5 ND ND 1 2 C 29-1031 5 16 21 1 2 A- 29-1071 Physician Assistants ND ND 53 ND $67,090 $66,080 $67,600 7 ND ND 67 ND ND F+ 29-1125 Recreational Therapists 50 60 2 3.70 $25,310 $15,950 $29,990 2 13 15 0 1 2 Source: Missouri Economic Research and Information Center, 2004 through 2014 Occupational Projections. MGT of America, Inc. Page J-6 Appendix J EXHIBIT 2 (Continued) JOBS GENERALLY REQUIRING BACHELOR'S DEGREE OR BACHELOR'S DEGREE PLUS WORK EXPERIENCE Top 10 Growth by Lvl. Employment Change Occupational 2004 2014 2004-2014 Grade Code Title Estimated Projected Net Percent Annual Wages 2004 Openings 2004-2014 Annual Openings Mean Entry Exp'd Growth Relc.pTotal JGrowthl Replc. I Total _ C _ A- _ A- 29-1129 29-1199 29-2011 Therapists, All Other ND Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners, All Other ND Medical & Clinical Laboratory Technologists 140 ND 1 ND 31 ND ND 20.86 ND 9.68 ND 17.91 30.26 ND ND $44,320 $193,810 $40,480 $52,040 $39,990 $22,760 $41,540 $56,000 $64,100 ND NA NA $30,080 NA NA $45,680 ND _ND 29 _ ND _ 3 ND 101 23 ND ND ND 4 _ND ND 0 ND 51 ND ND 5 37 66 3 4 7 170 29 B 29-2091 29-9011 29-9091 41-3021 41-3031 41-9031 53-2011 Orthotists & Prosthetists ND Occupational Health & Safety Specialists 30 Athletic Trainers ND Insurance Sales Agents 560 Securities, Commodities, & Financial Services Sales 80 Sales Engineers ND Airline Pilots, Copilots, & Flight Engineers ND ND 1 NA $29,840 $20,200 $20,530 $21,310 NA ND NA $45,070 $24,040 $52,040 $73,340 NA ND ND 2 ND ND 0 C 30 3 7 10 0 1 1 X D+ ND 1 ND 5 ND ND 1 A 670 101 135 236 10 14 24 9 32 2 1 3 A- _ B- _ D 100 _ 23 ND 6 ND -1 ND 20 ND ND 2 ND 1 ND ND 0 Source: Missouri Economic Research and Information Center, 2004 through 2014 Occupational Projections. MGT of America, Inc. Page J-7 Appendix J EXHIBIT 3 JOBS GENERALLY REQUIRING GRADUATE OR PROFESSIONAL DEGREES Top 10 Growth Occupational Employment Change 2004-2014 Annual Wages 2004 Openings 2004-2014 Annual Openings 2004 1 2014 Estimated Projected by Lvl. Grade Code Title Net Percentl Mean I Entry I Exp'd lGrowthl Replc. I Total JGrowthl Replc. I Total D 15-1011 D15-2031 D _- 15-2041 D 19-1022 B 19-1041 B 19-1042 Computer & Information Scientists, Research Operations Research Analysts Statisticians _ Microbiologists Epidemiologists Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists Environmental Scientists & Specialists, Including Heal Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists & Geographers ND NO ND ND ND ND 0 0 0 0 1 4 8 0 0 ND ND _ND ND ND ND 12.90 ND ND 10.58 ND ND ND ND ND 28.57 6.98 ND $82,400 $61,020 $51,830 $57,040 $45,420 $62,940 $25,290 ND $61,110 $53,520 $63,740 ND $44,650 $42,600 $65,330 $25,470 $41,460 $36,320 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ND ND ND 0 ND ND 1 ND ND 1 ND ND ND -_ND _ND _ND _ND _ 1 _ ND ND 2 _ ND ND ND 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 2 4 6 1 6 2 13 7 3 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 ND ND ND ND ND 0 ND ND 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND NA ND ND 6 ND D+ 19-2041 9-2042 D9-3011 B+9-3031 D-4111,9-3039 B D 19-3051 D- 19-3091 D- 19-3093 D 19-3099 B+ 21-1011 x B+ 21-1012 B 21-1013 B+ 21-1014 x C 21-1015 B- 21-1019 x B+ 21-1023 B 21-1091 x B 21-2011 x B+ 23-1011 A- 25-1011 B 25-1021 B 25-1022 D 25-1031 B 25-1032 B 25-1041 B 25-1042 B 25-1051 B 25-1052 B 25-1054 D 25-1061 B 25-1063 D- 25-1064 C 25-1065 B 25-1066 B 25-1067 D+ 25-1071 60 70 $17,110 ND NA $34,470 $29,390 ND NA $63,040 NA _ ND NA NA NA $30,080 $46,450 NA ND 8 ND ND _11 ND 11 19 1 ND 0 ND ND 1 ND ND ND Economists ND ND Clinical, Counseling, & School Psychologists Psychologists, All Other Urban & Regional Planners Anthropologists & Archeologists 100 120 11 23 34 1 ND ND 1 NA ND NA NA NA $16,250 $31,480 NA ND ND 2 ND ND ND 0 0 0 0 24 18 12 21 17 5 34 9 7 25 12 5 9 0 3 3 6 2 2 ND ND 3 ND ND ND _ND ND _ND _24 18 ND ND 17 _ND ND 9 7 25 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0 ND Historians Social Scientists & Related Workers, All Other Substance Abuse & Behavioral Disorder Counselors Educational, Vocational, & School Counselors Marriage & Family Therapists Mental Health Counselors Rehabilitation Counselors Counselors, All Other Mental Health & Substance Abuse Social Workers Health Educators Clergy Lawyers Business Teachers, Postsecondary Computer Science Teachers, Postsecondary Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary Architecture Teachers, Postsecondary Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary Agricultural Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary Biological Science Teachers, Postsecondary Atmospheric, Earth, Marine, & Space Sciences Teac Chemistry Teachers, Postsecondary Physics Teachers, Postsecondary Anthropology &Archeology Teachers, Postsecondary Economics Teachers, Postsecondary Geography Teachers, Postsecondary Political Science Teachers, Postsecondary Psychology Teachers, Postsecondary Sociology Teachers,Postsecondary Health Specialties Teachers, Postsecondary ND ND ND 0 ND ND ND ND ND 1 ND ND _ _ 80 110 -260 280 ND ND _ ND ND 190 200 ND ND ND ND 50 60 610 620 310 340 ND ND ND ND 19 43 2 2 59 77 2 6 ND 19 ND _ND _ND _ 4 ND _ND 1 13 4 ND ND ND ND 35 ND 9.09 ND _ND 16.98 1.15 8.06 ND ND _ND ND ND -ND ND ND ND ND ND ND _ND ND ND ND ND $28,350 $24,620 ND $35,660 $40,100 $96,790 ND ND ND $60,630 ND ND ND $58,970 ND ND $67,470 ND ND ND ND $54,140 ND $19,790 �NA ND $26 520 $29,260 $39,530 ND ND ND NA ND $32,640 NA ND $40,230 $45,530 $125,420 ND ND ND NA ND ND ND NA ND ND NA ND ND _ ND ND NA ND 43 60 2 ND 8 ND ND 58 _ ND 9 18 _ 1 125 132 _ 1 40 65 _ 3 ND 27 ND ND 10 ND ND ND ND 20 ND ND ND ND ND 0 ND ND ND ND ND 7 ND ND 6 ND ND 13 ND ND ND ND ND ND NA ND ND ND NDI ND ND ND ND 5 ND ND ND ND _ND _ ND _ ND ND ND ND ND ND 5 ND ND ND 2 ND NA ND ND ND 4 ND ND ND 0 ND ND 0 ND ND ND 3 0 3 _ 6 1 1 _ND ND ND ND _ND ND ND 6 ND ND 1 ND ND 7 ND ND 13 ND ND 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND N1A_ ND NDI ND ND ND ND ND 3 ND ND Source: Missouri Economic Research and Information Center, 2004 through 2014 Occupational Projections. MGT of America, Inc. Page J-8 Appendix J EXHIBIT 3 (Continued) JOBS GENERALLY REQUIRING GRADUATE OR PROFESSIONAL DEGREES Top 10 Growth by Lvl. Occupational Grade Code Title Employment 2004 2014 Estimated Projected Change 2004-2014 Net Percentl Annual Wages 2004 Openings 2004-2014 Annual Openings Mean I Entry I Exp'd lGrowthl Replc. I Total I Growthl Replc. I Total X A- B+ 25-1072 25-1081 25-1082 25-1111 25-1112 25-1113 Nursing Instructors & Teachers, Postsecondary Education Teachers, Postsecondary Library Science Teachers, Postsecondary Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Teachers, Posts Law Teachers, Postsecondary` Social Work Teachers, Postsecondary ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 20 0 8 0 2 ND ND ND ND _ND �ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 21 46 0 19 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2 5 0 2 0 0 3 2 4 1 1 0 2 D- $46,060 NA NA ND ND ND $97,100 NA NA $6Q,520 NA NA B D ND ND 0 ND ND B ND ND 4 ND ND A- 25-1121 25-1122 25-1123 Art, Drama, & Music Teachers, Postsecondary ND ND 12 Communications Teachers, Postsecondary ND ND 8 English Language &Literature Teachers, Postsecond ND ND 16 Foreign Language & Literature Teachers, Postsecond ND ND 2 History Teachers, Postsecondary ND ND 5 Philosophy & Religion Teachers, Postsecondary ND ND 2 Home Economics Teachers, Postsecondary ND ND 8 ND ND ND ND ND 27 ND ND B ND ND NDI NDI ND 18 ND ND B+ ND ND ND ND ND 37 ND ND B 25-1124 25-1125 25-1126 25-1192 ND ND ND ND ND ND 5 ND ND B ND ND ND ND ND ND 11 ND ND B ND ND ND ND ND ND 4 ND ND C ND ND ND ND ND ND 19 ND ND C 25-1193 25-1199 25-4011 25-4012 25-4013 25-4021 Recreation & Fitness Studies Teachers, Postseconda ND ND 5 ND 11.76 ND ND ND -3.70 –ND ND 9.01 ND ND ND ND 3_2.41 _ ND 14.35 ND ND 23.53 ND _ND 12.31 ND ND ND $58,960 $36,670 _ND ND $42,950 ND ND ND ND NA NA _ NA NA _ ND ND ND ND $28,610 $50,120 ND ND ND ND ND ND 111 ND ND 1 1 0 0 0 5 1 0 6 0 0 0 1 6 5 6 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 3 3 4 0 B- Postsecondary Teachers, All Other 30 40 4 4 81 12 0 1 D- Archivists ND ND 0 ND ND 0 ND ND D Curators ND ND 0 ND ND 1 ND ND F+ Museum Technicians & Conservators ND ND 0 ND ND 1 ND ND C Librarians 190 180 -7 0 45 45 0 5 B- 25-9031 29-1011 29-1021 29-1022 29-1023 29-1024 29-1041 29-1051 29-1061 29-1062 29-1063 29-1064 29-1065 29-1067 29-1069 29-1121 29-1122 29-1123 29-1127 29-1131 Instructional Coordinators ND ND 6 Chiropractors ND ND 0 Dentists, General 220 240 20 Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeons ND ND 1 Orthodontists ND ND 1 Prosthodontists ND ND 1 Optometrists ND ND 0 Pharmacists 110 140 35 Anesthesiologists ND ND 33 Family & General Practitioners 220 250 31 Internists, General ND ND 5 Obstetricians & Gynecologists ND ND 8 Pediatricians, General 20 20 4 _ND ND 10 ND ND ND ND 3 ND ND �_ 20 37 57 2 4 _ND ND 2 ND ND ND ND 2 ND ND __ND ND 1 ND ND ND ND 7 ND ND D x B+ $64,570 $53,910 $69,900 B $162,380 NA NA B $179,320 NA NA ND ND ND ND ND ND $86,740 $65,610 $97,300 $84,230 $81,270 $85,700 $138,460 $72,090 $171,640 ND ND ND $195,230 NA NA $180,800 NA NA NI ND ND $197,200 NA NA $184,360 NA NA ND ND ND $45,330 NA NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND B D x A- 35 21 56 4 2 x A- ND ND 51 ND ND x A- 31 29 60 3 3 B ND ND 8 ND NDI B B _ B- —29-1066 A- B- _ D —29-1081 D- A- , A- �_ B- D ND NDI 12 NDI ND 4 2 6 0 0 Psychiatrists ND ND 5 _ND ND 11 ND ND ND ND 24 ND ND _ 8 9 17 1 1 _ND ND 1 ND ND ND ND 0 ND ND _ND ND 29 ND ND �_ ND ND 29 ND ND –ND ND 44 ND IN ND ND 21 NDI ND Surgeons ND ND 15 Physicians & Surgeons, All Other 70 70 8 Podiatrists NDI ND 0 Audiologists ND ND 0 Occupational Therapists ND ND 17 Physical Therapists _ _ ND ND 19 Speech -Language Pathologists ND ND 4 Veterinarians ND ND 0 ND ND ND ND Source: Missouri Economic Research and Information Center, 2004 through 2014 Occupational Projections. MGT of America, Inc. Page J-9 Staff: Scott A. Meyer, City Manager Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT Appropriation from General Fund balance for MAGNET for the purpose of business attraction in the City of Cape Girardeau. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This ordinance would appropriate funds for MAGNET per the 2020 contract, section 8, between the City of Cape Girardeau and the Cape Area MAGNET for the purpose of bringing business into the city limits of Cape Girardeau. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The mission of the Cape Area MAGNET is to foster a strong economic environment resulting in the retention, expansion, creation, and attraction of jobs and new investment in the area. The MAGNET serves as the lead contact for the area's economic development efforts. The 2020 contract between the City of Cape Girardeau and the Cape Area MAGNET states the MAGNET may request up to $50,000 in additional funds for the purpose of bringing business within the city limits of Cape Girardeau. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: ❑ MACNEr Appropriation Ordinance.doc Ordinance ❑ 2020.12.22 - Marketing Investment Fund_Request.pdf Request Letter BILL NO. 21-07 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS RELATED TO THE 2020 MAGNET CONTRACT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2021, IN THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1. The City Council of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, hereby appropriates expenditures related to MAGNET marketing fund for: City Manager Contingency - Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) to satisfy 2020 Contract for additional funds for purpose of business development in the City of Cape Girardeau. ARTICLE 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten days after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2021. Bob Fox, Mayor ATTEST: Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk CAPE. GIRARDEAu AREA MR ET Gill Attracting Business and Industny Deciem batt 22, 2020 Mr. %Scott Meyen City of Cape Girardeau City Manager 401 Inc ependencis Stnaei Cape Girarc eau, MO 63703 Cape Girardeau Area MAGNET 220 NortF Flou nlairi SloaErl C aple G irarc ear , IV CI E13 - W1 Phone E 73-3341-maa ww w.oapearvamagmi mom Dear Mr. N e} er, As pen the 3020 contract between Cape GirardeaL Anea MAGN ET and the City of Cape Girardeau, L ric er seation 8, Clape Gittanc eau Anea MAGN EIT would like to request $50,000 in addiiicinal 11L rids for the pt,npase of bringing business with the city lirrliis of Clape Ginanceau. We M aL Id like la thank if e Cliiy of Cape Ginanc eau flan their ongoing support a1 Cape GirardeaL Area MAGN BT in our efforts is being businesses is OL r region. LRespeCtIL Ily, Charlie Herb Chairman Cape Girardeau Area N AIGN EM Staff: W Eric Cunningham, City Agenda: Attorney 1/19/2021 SUBJECT A Resolution of official intent of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, toward the issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds to finance an Industrial Development Project and authorizing certain actions relating thereto. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Chief Property Development, LLC (the "Company") has requested that the City issue its industrial revenue bonds in an approximate principal amount of $10,000,000 to facilitate real property tax abatement and sales tax exemption on construction materials in connection with the construction of three art buildings (the "Project") at 340 S. Frederick Street, which will be leased to Southeast Missouri State University. The Bonds will be payable solely out of payments, revenues and receipts derived from the lease of the Project by the City to the Company. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Industrial revenue bonds issued pursuant to Chapter 100 of the Missouri Revised Statutes are frequently used to provide tax abatement for projects throughout the State. Local projects that have received tax abatement under Chapter 100 include P&G, Mondi and Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures. The Project is placed in the name of the City while the bonds are outstanding, thus exempting the property from property taxes. The Project is leased to the Company, and the lease payments made by the Company pay the principal of and interest on the bonds. The bonds are non-recourse and are not a debt or payment obligation of the City. When the bonds are paid, title to the Project is transferred back to the Company. If approved, 100% of the real property taxes on the Project will be abated for 15 years. The estimated amount of the abated taxes is shown in the Cost/Benefit Analysis attached to the Resolution. The Company will continue to pay taxes on the underlying real estate (slightly more than $7,000 annually). Additionally, the City will provide a sales tax exemption certificate for the purpose of enabling the Company to obtain sales tax exemption on all construction materials for the Project improvements (value of approximately $178,000). FINANCIAL UYIPACT It's estimated the City will forego approximately $155,000 in real estate taxes over the 15 -year abatement period and approximately $5,000 in sales taxes on construction materials. The estimated amount of the abated taxes on each taxing district is shown in the Cost/Benefit Analysis. SUSTAINABILITY: ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS The City believes that the Company's investment in the Project will create construction jobs during the construction period and spur additional investment in the City. Construction of the Project will enhance the aesthetics and vibrancy of the Project Site and surrounding area. The Project will be subleased to Southeast Missouri State University, expanding the presence of the River Campus and enabling the Department of Art & Design to provide expanded opportunities for students. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Resolution and a 15 -year abatement term. PUBLIC OUTREACH Scott Blank, the owner of the Company, advises he has met with representatives of Cape Girardeau County and the Cape Girardeau School District and that they have endorsed real property abatement for 15 years. A copy of the Plan for an Industrial Development Project and Cost/Benefit Analysis must be sent by certified mail to each taxing district at least 20 days before the Council's approval of the transaction. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: D Inducement Resolution.Bonds.G B..docx Resolution D Plan Tax !=act Analysis.docx Plan, Res. Exhibit A D Cane Glmrdeau CBA.pdf CBA BILL NO. 21-08 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, TOWARD THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ACTIONS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri (the "City"), is authorized and empowered under the provisions of Article VI, Section 27(b) of the Missouri Constitution, as amended, Sections 100.010 to 100.200, inclusive, of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, as amended (collectively, the "Act"), and its City Charter to purchase, construct, extend and improve certain projects (as defined in the Act) for the purposes set forth in the Act and to issue industrial revenue bonds for the purpose of providing funds to pay the costs of such projects and to lease or otherwise dispose of such projects to private persons or corporations for manufacturing, commercial, warehousing and industrial development purposes upon such terms and conditions as the City deems advisable; and WHEREAS, Chief Property Development, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company (the "Company"), has requested that the City (1) issue its industrial revenue bonds in an approximate principal amount of $10,000,000 (the "Bonds") to provide funds to pay certain costs of acquiring and constructing a commercial building to be used for classrooms and other purposes (the "Project Improvements") to be located at 340 S. Frederick Street in the City (the "Project Site" and, together with the Project Improvements, the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Bonds will be payable solely out of payments, revenues and receipts derived from the lease of the Project by the City to the Company; and WHEREAS, the Company will sublease the Project to Southeast Missouri State University to enable the Department of Art & Design to provide expanded opportunities for students and to expand the presence of the River Campus; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is necessary and desirable to declare the official intent of the City to finance the costs of the Project from the proceeds of the Bonds, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Act requires the City to prepare a plan in connection with any industrial development project proposed to be undertaken pursuant to the Act; and WHEREAS, a Plan for an Industrial Development Project and Cost/Benefit Analysis for the Project (the "Plan") has been prepared; and WHEREAS, the Act requires the City Council, not less than 20 days before the City Council's approval of the Plan, to provide notice thereof to all affected cities, fire protection districts, ambulance districts, school districts, community college districts and counties; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Finding of Public Benefit. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the Project will promote the economic well-being and development of the City and the taxing districts encompassing the area of the Project, and that the issuance of the Bonds to pay the costs of the Project will be in furtherance of the public purposes set forth in the Act. Section 2. Declaration of Intent. The City Council hereby declares the intent of the City to issue the Bonds to provide funds to finance the costs of the Project, subject to the conditions set forth in this Resolution. Section 3. Limited Obligations. The Bonds shall be limited special revenue obligations payable solely out of payments, revenues and receipts derived from the lease of the Project by the City to the Company. The Bonds and the interest thereon shall not be a debt of the City or the State of Missouri, and neither the City nor the State shall be liable thereon, and the Bonds shall not constitute an indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter debt limitation or restriction. Section 4. Conditions to Issuance of Bonds. This Resolution constitutes a statement of intent of the City Council to provide 15 years of tax abatement for each phase of the Project. The issuance of the Bonds and the execution and delivery of any documents related to financing the Project are subject, in the sole discretion of the City, to the following conditions: hereto; (a) approval by the City Council of the Plan, in substantially the form of Exhibit A (b) authorization by ordinance of the City Council; (c) obtaining any other necessary governmental approvals for the Project; (d) agreement by the City and the Company on (1) mutually acceptable terms for the Bonds and for the sale and delivery thereof and (2) mutually acceptable terms and conditions of any documents related to the issuance of the Bonds and the Project; and (e) receipt by the City of satisfactory indemnification for all matters relating to the Project. Section 5. Reimbursement for Project Costs. The Company is hereby authorized to proceed with the purchase and construction of the Project, including the entering of contracts and purchase orders in connection therewith, and to advance such funds as may be necessary to accomplish those purposes. If the Bonds are issued, the Company may be reimbursed solely out of the proceeds thereof for expenditures paid or incurred in connection with the Project. Section 6. Sales Tax Relief. The City will provide a sales tax certificate (the "Certificate") for the purpose of enabling the Company to obtain sales tax exemption on all construction materials for the Project Improvements, upon the Company's agreement to fully indemnify and protect the City from any judgments or actions arising from the use of the Certificate if the City does not issue the Bonds for any reason. Section 7. Notice to Taxing Districts. The City Clerk, on behalf of the City Council, shall send such notices as are required by the Act in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. Section 8. Preparation of Documents. The City Attorney and Gilmore & Bell, P.C., as Bond Counsel, and the officers, employees and representatives of the City, are hereby authorized to work -2- with the Company, its counsel and others to prepare for submission to and final action by the City Council all documents necessary to effect the authorization, issuance and sale of the Bonds and other actions contemplated hereunder in connection with the financing of the Project. Section 9. Further Authority. The City hereby authorizes and empowers the officers and representatives of the City to do all such acts and things and to execute, acknowledge and deliver all such documents as may in their discretion be deemed necessary or desirable to carry out or comply with the terms and provisions of this Resolution in connection with the structure and sale of the Bonds. All of the acts and undertakings of such officers and representatives that are in conformity with the intent and purposes of this Resolution, whether heretofore or hereafter taken or done, shall be and the same are hereby in all respects, ratified, confirmed and approved. Section 10. Cancellation. If for any reason the Bonds are not issued within six months after the date of adoption of this Resolution, this Resolution shall be deemed canceled, and neither party will thereafter have any rights under this Resolution against the other, except that the Company shall reimburse the City for all fees and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the City and Bond Counsel in connection with the Project. Section 11. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council this 19' day of January, 2021. (SEAL) ATTEST: Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk -3- Bob Fox, Mayor EXHIBIT A PLAN FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI PLAN FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR CHIEF PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN.........................................................................................................1 II. DESCRIPTION OF CHAPTER 100 FINANCINGS................................................................1 General...........................................................................................................................................1 Issuance and Sale of Bonds..........................................................................................................1 PropertyTax Abatement..............................................................................................................2 SalesTax Exemption.....................................................................................................................2 III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PARTIES...........................................................................................2 ChiefProperty Development, LLC.............................................................................................2 City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri...............................................................................................2 IV. REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT..............................................................................................2 Descriptionof the Project.............................................................................................................2 Estimate of the Costs of the Project............................................................................................3 Sources of Funds to be Expended for the Project......................................................................3 Statement of the Terms Upon Which the Project is to be Leased or Otherwise Disposed ofby the City...............................................................................................................................3 Affected School District, Community College District, Emergency Service Providers, County and City.......................................................................................................3 CurrentAssessed Valuation.........................................................................................................3 Payments in Lieu of Taxes...........................................................................................................3 SalesTax Exemption.....................................................................................................................4 Cost/Benefit Analysis and Discussion of Exhibits......................................................................4 V. ASSUMPTIONS AND BASIS OF PLAN...................................................................................5 ATTACHMENT A - SUMMARY OF KEY ASSUMPTIONS EXHIBIT 1- SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT EXHIBIT 2 - PROJECTED REAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES IF PROJECT IS NOT BUILT EXHIBIT 3 - PROJECTED REAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES IF PROJECT IS BUILT BUT WITHOUT ABATEMENT CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI PLAN FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS CHIEF PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, LLC I. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN The City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri (the "City"), intends to issue taxable industrial revenue bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $10,000,000 (the "Bonds") to finance the costs of an industrial development project (the "Project") for the benefit of Chief Property Development, LLC (the "Company"). The Bonds will be issued pursuant to the provisions of the City Charter, Sections 100.010 to 100.200 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri ("Chapter 100") and Article VI, Section 27(b) of the Missouri Constitution (collectively with Chapter 100, the "Act"). The Bonds will initially be owned by the Company, and cannot be transferred, other than to the Company's affiliates and lenders, without the City's prior approval. Gilmore & Bell, P.C. has prepared this Plan for an Industrial Development Project and Cost/Benefit Analysis (this "Plan") to satisfy requirements of the Act and to analyze the potential costs and benefits, including the related tax impact on all affected taxing jurisdictions, of using industrial revenue bonds to finance the Project and to facilitate abatement of ad valorem taxes on the bond -financed property. II. DESCRIPTION OF CHAPTER 100 FINANCINGS General. Chapter 100 authorizes cities, counties, towns and villages to issue industrial development revenue bonds to finance the purchase, construction, extension and improvement of warehouses, distribution facilities, research and development facilities, office industries, agricultural processing industries, service facilities that provide interstate commerce, industrial plants, including the real estate either within or without the limits of such municipalities, buildings, fixtures and machinery. In addition, Article VI, Section 27(b) of the Missouri Constitution authorizes cities, counties, towns and villages to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of paying all or part of the cost of purchasing, constructing, extending or improving any facility for manufacturing, commercial, warehousing and industrial development purposes, including the real estate, buildings, fixtures and machinery. Issuance and Sale of Bonds. Revenue bonds issued pursuant to the Act do not require voter approval and are payable solely from revenues received from a lease or other disposition of the project. The municipality issues its bonds and in exchange, the benefited company promises to make payments that are sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds as they become due. Thus, the municipality merely acts as a conduit for the financing. Concurrently with the closing of the bonds, the company will lease the site on which the industrial development project will be located to the municipality. The municipality will immediately lease the project site and the improvements thereon back to the benefited company pursuant to a lease agreement. The lease agreement will require the company, acting on behalf of the municipality, to use the bond proceeds to purchase and construct the project. Once construction is complete, the company will convey title to the project to the municipality. (The municipality must be the legal owner of the property while the bonds are outstanding for the property to be eligible for tax abatement, as further described below.) Under the lease agreement, the company typically: (1) unconditionally agrees to make payments sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds as they become due; (2) agrees, at its own expense, to maintain the project, to pay all taxes and assessments with respect to the project and to maintain adequate insurance; (3) may, at its own expense, make certain additions, modifications or improvements to the project; (4) may assign its interests under the lease agreement or sublease the project while remaining responsible for payments under the lease agreement; (5) covenants to maintain its corporate existence during the term of the bond issue; and (6) agrees to indemnify the municipality for any liability the municipality might incur as a result of its participation in the transaction. Property Tax Abatement. Under Article X, Section 6 of the Missouri Constitution and Section 137.100 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, all property of any political subdivision is exempt from taxation. In a typical Chapter 100 transaction, the municipality holds fee title to the project and leases the project to the benefited company. Although the Missouri Supreme Court has held that the leasehold interest is taxable, it is taxable only to the extent that the economic value of the lease is less than the actual market value of the lease. See Iron County v. State Tax Commission, 437 S.W.2d 665 (Mo. 1968)(en bane) and St. Louis County v. State Tax Commission, 406 S.W.2d 644 (Mo. 1966)(en banc). If the rental payments under the lease agreement equal the actual debt service payments on the bonds, the leasehold interest should have no "bonus value" and the bond -financed property should be exempt from ad valorem taxation while the bonds are outstanding. If the municipality and the company determine that partial tax abatement is desirable, the company may agree to make payments in lieu of taxes (sometimes referred to as "PILOTS"). The amount of payments in lieu of taxes is negotiable. The payments in lieu of taxes are payable by December 31 of each year and are distributed to the municipality and to each political subdivision within the boundaries of the project in the same manner and in the same proportion as property taxes would otherwise be distributed under Missouri law. Sales Tax Exemption. In addition to property tax abatement, qualified building materials can be exempt from sales tax if approved by the municipality. The sales tax exemption is evidenced by a project exemption certificate issued by the municipality. III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PARTIES Chief Property Development, LLC. The Company is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri (the "State") for the purpose of, among other things, purchasing, developing and maintaining real estate. City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. The City is a home rule charter city and political subdivision of the State. The City is authorized and empowered pursuant to the provisions of the City Charter and the Act to purchase, construct, extend and improve certain projects (as defined in the Act) and to issue industrial development revenue bonds for the purpose of providing funds to pay the costs of such projects and to lease or otherwise dispose of such projects to private persons or corporations for manufacturing, commercial, warehousing and industrial development purposes upon such terms and conditions as the City deems advisable. IV. REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT Description of the Project. The Project consists of constructing three art buildings on an approximately 1.1 -acre parcel of land located at 340 S. Frederick Street in the City (together with the existing structures thereon, the "Project Site"). The Project will be completed in two phases. The first -2- phase ("Phase 1") consists of constructing two buildings, one approximately 10,000 square feet and the other approximately 5,000 square feet. Phase 1 is expected to be complete in the summer of 2021. The second phase ("Phase 2") consists of constructing an 18,000 square foot building. Phase 2 is expected to be complete by the end of 2022. B. Estimate of the Costs of the Project. The Company expects the construction of the Project to cost approximately $9,000,000. The Bonds are being issued in the maximum principal amount of $10,000,000 to provide for contingencies. C. Sources of Funds to be Expended for the Project. The sources of funds to be expended for the Project will be the proceeds of the Bonds in the maximum principal amount of $10,000,000 and other available funds of the Company. The Bonds will be payable solely from the revenues derived by the City from the lease or other disposition of the Project (as further described below). The Bonds will not be an indebtedness or general obligation, debt or liability of the City or the State. No tax revenues will be used to repay the Bonds. D. Statement of the Terms Upon Which the Project is to be Leased or Otherwise Disposed of by the City. During the construction period, the Company will lease the Project Site to the City. After construction of each phase is complete, the Company will convey fee title to that portion of the completed Project to the City. The City will lease the Project Site and the Project back to the Company for lease payments equal to the principal of and interest on the Bonds, plus certain payments in lieu of taxes. Under the terms of the lease agreement with the City, the Company will have the option to purchase the Project at the termination of the lease. The lease between the City and the Company will terminate on December 31 of the fifteenth year after Phase 2 is complete, unless terminated sooner pursuant to the terms of the lease. E. Affected School District, Community College District, Emergency Service Providers, County and City. The Cape Girardeau School District No. 63 is the school district affected by the Project. There are no affected community college districts or emergency service providers affected by the Project. Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, is the county affected by the Project. The City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, is the city affected by the Project. The Cost/Benefit Analysis attached hereto identifies all other taxing districts affected by the Project (other than those taxing entities solely affected by the Project with respect to receipt of tax revenues from the commercial surcharge tax). F. Current Assessed Valuation. The most recent equalized assessed valuation of the real property at the Project Site is $128,260. The Company estimates the total equalized assessed valuation of the real property included in the Project after construction of the Project will be approximately $2,592,000, which was calculated as follows: Estimated Costs of the Project = $9,000,000 Estimated Appraised Value of the Project = $9,000,000 * 90% _ $8,100,000 Estimated Assessed Value of the Project = $8,100,000 * 32% _ $2,592,000 If the Company's actual investment is more or less than anticipated, the assessed valuation will likely be greater or lower. The Cape Girardeau County Assessor will make the final determination of the assessed value. G. Payments in Lieu of Taxes. If this Plan is approved by the City, the City intends to issue the Bonds, take possession of the Project and extend tax abatement on the Project to the Company. During the tax abatement period, the Company will pay 100% of the ad valorem real property taxes due on the Project Site. -3- Pursuant to Section 100.050 of the Act, certain emergency service districts may elect to be reimbursed up to 100% of the taxes they would have received, but for the tax abatement. No such emergency service districts currently exist in the City. The Company will make PILOTS required to satisfy the obligations to any applicable emergency service districts that may exist in the future, as required by the Act. K Sales Tax Exemption. Qualified building materials purchased for the construction of the Project are expected to be exempt from sales tax pursuant to the provisions of Section 144.062 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri and the Bond documents upon delivery of a project exemption certificate by the City to the Company. If this Plan is approved by the City, the City intends to deliver a project exemption certificate. L Cost/Benefit Analysis and Discussion of Exhibits. In compliance with Section 100.050.2(3) of the Act, this Plan has been prepared to show the costs and benefits to the City and to other taxing jurisdictions affected by the tax abatements and exemptions of the Project. The projections in the Cost/Benefit Analysis are estimates based on numerous assumptions set forth in Attachment A hereto. Therefore, the actual revenues generated from the Project may be significantly different from those shown in the Cost/Benefit Analysis. The following is a summary of the exhibits attached to this Plan that show the direct tax impact the Project is expected to have on each taxing jurisdiction and key ancillary benefits expected to be derived from the Project. This Plan does not attempt to quantify the overall economic impact of the Project. Summary of Property Tax Abatement. Exhibit 1 provides a summary for each affected taxing district of (1) the total estimated tax revenues that will be generated on the Project Site if the Project is not built, (2) the total estimated tax revenues that will be generated on the Project Site if the Project is built and the Project does not receive tax abatement and (3) the total estimated value of the abatement to the Company. Real Property Tax Revenues. Exhibit 2 provides the projected real property tax revenues that will be generated from the Project Site if the Project is not built. Exhibit 3 provides the projected real property tax revenues that will be generated from the Project Site if the Project is built but the Project does not receive tax abatement. Refer to Attachment A for the assumptions related to the determination of the assessed values and the tax formulas. Sales and Use Tax Exemption. The City will grant a sales and use tax exemption on the qualified building materials necessary to construct the Project. For purposes of determining the impact of the sales tax exemption on the qualified building materials on the affected taxing jurisdictions granted by the City, it was assumed that: • $3,600,000 of the total costs of the Project will be allocated to construction material costs; • the applicable sales tax rate is 8.475%, of which 4.225% is allocated to the State, 1.500% is allocated to Cape Girardeau County and 2.750% is allocated to the City; • the applicable use tax rate is 5.725%, of which 4.225% is allocated to the State and 1.500% is allocated to Cape Girardeau County; -4- • 80% of the qualified construction materials will be subject to the State's sales tax and 20% will be subject to the State's use tax; • 20% of the qualified construction materials will be subject to the County's sales and use taxes; and • 5% of the qualified construction materials will be subject to the City's sales tax. Please note that any variance in these assumptions will alter the net fiscal impact of the sales tax exemption on the affected taxing jurisdictions. Based on the assumptions set forth above, the net fiscal impact of the sales and use tax exemption on the qualified building materials granted by the City is approximately $178,650, allocated as follows: Sales Tax Use Tax Total State $121,680 $30,420 $152,100 County 10,800 10,800 21,600 City 4,950 0 4,950 Total $137,430 $41,220 $178,650 Ancillary Project Benefits. The City believes that the Company's investment in the Project will create construction jobs during the construction period and spur additional investment in the City. Construction of the Project will enhance the aesthetics and vibrancy of the Project Site and surrounding area. The Project will be subleased to Southeast Missouri State University, expanding the presence of the River Campus and enabling the Department of Art & Design to provide expanded opportunities for students. None of these ancillary impacts were measured for purposes of this Plan. V. ASSUMPTIONS AND BASIS OF PLAN This Plan includes assumptions that impact the amount of the abatement and exemptions proposed for the Project. See Attachment A for a summary of these assumptions. In addition to the foregoing, in order to complete this Plan, Gilmore & Bell, P.C. has generally reviewed and relied upon information furnished by, and has participated in conferences with, representatives of the City and its counsel, representatives of the Company, and other persons as the firm has deemed appropriate. Gilmore & Bell, P.C. does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of any of the information provided and has not independently verified the accuracy, completeness or fairness of such information. -5- ATTACHMENT A SUMMARY OF KEY ASSUMPTIONS 1. The Company will invest $9,000,000 in the Project. 2. Construction of Phase 1 will be complete by the end of 2021, and construction of Phase 2 will be complete by the end of 2022. 3. Following the respective construction period of each phase, that portion of the completed Project will be owned by the City and leased to the Company with an option to purchase. As long as the Project is owned by the City, it will be exempt from ad valorem property taxes. 4. Phase 1 will be excluded from the calculation of ad valorem real property tax from 2022 through 2036. Phase 2 will be excluded from the calculation of ad valorem real property tax from 2023 through 2037. 5. During the tax abatement period, the Company will pay 100% of the ad valorem real property taxes due on the Project Site. 6. The Company will not make any PILOTs while the Project is subject to ad valorem real property tax exemption. 7. Real property taxes are calculated using the following formula: (Assessed Value * Tax Rate)/100 8. The Company estimates the total equalized assessed valuation of real property included in the Project after construction of the Project will be approximately $2,592,000, which was calculated as follows: Estimated Costs of the Project = $9,000,000 Estimated Appraised Value of the Project = $9,000,000 * 90% = $8,100,000 Estimated Assessed Value of the Project = $8,100,000 * 32% = $2,592,000 10. Each phase will be assessed in the first full year after construction is complete. Each phase will be reassessed every odd -numbered year thereafter. An estimated growth rate of 2% on the Project has been assumed for each reassessment. 11. The tax rates used in this Plan reflect the rates in effect for the tax year 2020. The tax rates were held constant through the 2037 tax year. * * * The Cost/Benefit Analysis has been prepared on the basis of factual information and assumptions provided to Gilmore & Bell, P.C. by, or on behalf of, the City and the Company. This information is provided in conjunction with our legal representation of the City, as its bond counsel, for this transaction. It is not intended as financial advice or a financial recommendation to the City, the Company or any other taxing jurisdiction that may be affected by the Project. Gilmore & Bell, P.C. is not a financial advisor or a "municipal advisor" as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. EXHIBIT 1 SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT Projected Real Projected Real Property Tax Properr-Tax Revenues if Project Projected ReA Projected Tax Commercial Revenues if Project is Built (Without PropertrPlLOIs if Abitement if Project Taxing Jurisdiction Tar -Rate is Not Built Abatement) Project is Built is Built State of.Missouri U_O30C 667 S 12-911 5 - 5 12.506 County. of Lap e Girardeau - General Revenue 0-0750 1,668 32,279 - 31266 County. of Cap e Girardeau - Mental Health 0.0772 1,717 33,2.2.5 - 32;,133' Count.- of Cap a Girardeau - Public Health 0.09+60 2,135 41,316 - 40,02.1 County. of Cape Girardeau - Senior Senices 0.0478 1,063 20.572 - 19,92 .7 County. of Cap e Girarde au - Developmentally- Ibis able 0.0553 1,230 237800 - 23,053 Citi- of Cape Girardeau - General 03044 6,769 131,007 - 126,898 City of Cape Girardeau -Health 0.0570 12.68 2.4,532 - 23,762 Cape Girardeau Scho o 1 Dis trict 4.1567 92.433 1,788,950 - 1,732,845 Cape Girardeau Public: Library- 03152 7,009 135,655 - 131,401 Commercial Surtax 03690 82.06 158,809 - 153,829 5.5836 5 124,164 5 2,403:056 5 - 5 2.327,691 EXHIBIT 2 PROJECTED REAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES IF PROJECT IS NOT BUILT E.stiunatedAssesse:dValue ofProjectSite S 129-260 5 130,925 5 134,8.5 S 133,442 S 133,442 S 136,111 S 136,111 S 139,833 Tax Rate Taxing Jurisdiction per 5100 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 State of.viissouri 0°0300 S 38 S 39 S 39 S 40 S 40 S 41 S 41 S 42 County of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 00750 96 98 98 loo loo 102 102 104 Count*- of Cape Girardeau - Mental Health 0.0772 99 lot 101 103 103 l45 l45 107 County of Cape Girardeau - Public. Health 0.0960 123 126 126 128 128 131 131 133 County ofCap eGirardeau - Senior Senices 0.0478 61 63 63 64 64 65 65 66 County of Cape Girardeau - Developmentallv. Disabled 0.0553 71 72 72 74 74 75 75 77 City. of Cape Girardeau - General 03044 390 398 398 406 406 414 414 423 Cite of Cape Girardeau - Health 0°0570 73 75 75 76 76 78 78 79 Cape Girardeau School District 4.1567 5,331 5,438 5,438 5,547 5,547 5,658 5,658 5,771 Cape Girardeau Public Library 03152 404 412 412 421 421 429 429 438 Commercial Surtax 03690 473 483 483 492 492, 502 502 512 55836 S 7,162 S 7,305 S 7-305 S 7,451 S 7,451 S 7,600 S 7,600 S 7,752 Estimated As.sessedValue ofProjectSite S 138.833 S 141,609 S 141,609 S 144,442. S 144,442 S 147,330 S 147,330 S 150,277 Tax Rate Taxing Jurisdiction per Sloo 2030 2031 2032 2.033 2034 2435 2036 2037 -f otal State ofMissouri 0.0300 S 42 S 42 S 42 S 43 5 43 S 44 S 44 S 45 S 667 Count.- of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 0.0754 104 106 106 103 108 111 111 113 1,668 County of Cape Girardeau -Mental He alth 0.0772 107 109 109 117. 112. 114 114 116 1,717 Count} of Cape Girardeau - Public Health 0.0960 133 136 136 139 139 141 141 144 2,135 Count% of Cape Girardeau - Senior Senrice:s 0.0478 66 69 68 69 69 70 70 72 1,063 County of Cape Girardeau - Developmentally Disabled 0.0553 77 78 78 80 80 81 81 83 1,230 Cite of Cape Girardeau - General 03044 423 431 431 440 - i0 448 449 457 6,769 City of Cape Girardeau - Health 0.0570 79 at 91 82 82 94 34 86 1268 Cape Girardeau School District 4.1567 5°771 5,886 5,886 6,004 6,004 6,124 6:124 6,247 92,,433 Cape Girardeau Public Library,- 03152 438 446 446 455 455 464 464 474 7,009 Commercial Surtax 03690 512 523 523 533 533 544 544 555 9206 5.5936 S 7,752. S 7,907 S 7,907 S 5-065 S 3,065 S 3,37.6 S 3.776 S 3.391 S 124,16- EXHIBIT 3 PROJECTED REAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES IF PROJECT IS BUILT BUT WITHOUT ABATEMENT Estimated As s es s ed Value of Phase 1 S 1,152000 S 1,175,040 S 1,175,040 S 17198,541 S 17198,541 S 1222512 S 1222512 'S 1246,962 Estimated As s es s ed Value of Phase 2. Estimated As s es s ed Value ofPhase2 S - 5 1,440,000 S 1,440,000 S 1,469,800 S 1,468,8!00 S 1,498,176 S 1,498,176 S 1,528,140 Estimated As s e s s e d Value ofProject(Both�Ihases; 5 1,152,000 S 2.615.010 S 2,615,440 5 2,667341 5 2667341 5 2,72.0.688 S 2,720°63,8 S 1775,101 5 2944,960 Tax Rate Tax Rate Taxinz Jurisdiction per 5100 2022 2023 2024 2025 2030 20026 2027 2028 2429 State ofrlissouri 0.4306 5 346 S 785 S 785 S 800 S 800 5 816 S 816 S 833 County of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 0.0750 864 1,961 1.961 2001. County- of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 2001 2,041 2,041 2,081 County. of Cape Girardeau - Mental Health 0.0772 989 2,019 2,019 2,059 32,278 2,059 2,100 2,100 2,142 County. of Cape Girardeau - Public Health 0.0960 1,106 2,510 2,510 2,561 2,319 2,561 2,612 2,612 2664 County of Cape Girardeau - Senior Services 0.0478 551 13.50 1,250 1,275 2,927 1275 1300 U00 1327 County of Cape Girardeau -Developmentally Disabled 0.0553 637 1,446 1,446 1,475 1,405 1,475 17505 1,505 1,535 City of Cape Girardeau - General 03044 3,507 7,960 7,960 8,119 1,597 8,119 83.82 9,292 8,447 City of Cape Girardeau -Health 0.0570 657 1,491 1,491 1,520 V20 1,551 1,551 1,582 Cap e Girardeau S cho ol District 4.1567 47,885 108,694 108699 110,873 1,646 110,873 113,091 113,091 115,353 Cape Girardeau Public library 03152 3,631 9,243 9,243 8,407 117,660 8,407 5,576 8,576 8,747 Commercial Surtax 03690 4,251 9,650 9,650 9,942 8,922 9,842 10,039 10,039 10340 5.5316 5 64.313 5 146.013 S 116.013 5 148.934 S 148:931 S 151.911 5 151.41' S 154.951 Estimated Assessed Value of PhaseI S 1246.962, S 13:71,901 S 1271.901 5 1,297,339 'S 13.97339 5 1323386 S 13233.86 S 1.349,752. Estimated As s es s ed Value ofPhase2 S 1,529,140 5 1,558,702 S 1,558;702 5 1,589,876 S 1,589,876 5 1,621,674 S 1,621,674 5 1,651,107 Estimated Assessed Value ofProject(Both Phases) S _1775,101 S 2,83003 5 1830,603 5 2,897,215 S 2887215 5 2944,960 5 2944,960 S 3,003,859 Tax Rate Taxing Jurisdiction perS100 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 total State ofialissouri 0.0300 5 833 S 849 S 849 S am S 866 S 883 S 883 S 901 S 12-911 County- of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 0.0750 2,081 2123 2,123 2165 2165 2,209 2,209 2253 32,278 County. of Cape Girardeau-144ental Health 0.0772 2,142 1195 2,1x5 222.9 2229 22.74 2,274 2,319 33;2__ County= of Cape: Girardeau - Public Health 0.0460 2,664 2,717 2;717 2,772 1772 2,927 2,927 2,8&4 -" 1;S It County ofCapeGirardeau - Senior Sem•2es 0.0479 1,327 1353 1353 1,390 1,390 1,405 1,409 1.436 20.7 County of Cape. Girardeau - Developmentally Disabled 0.0553 1,535 1,565 1,565 17597 1,597 1,629 1,629 1,661 237900 City. of Cape Girardeau - General 03074 9,447 8,616 8,616 &,799 8;7&9 3,9648967 9,144 131,007 City of Cap a Girardeau - Health 0.0570 1,592 1,613 1,613 1,646 1,646 1,679 1,679 1,712 24,5322 Cape Girardeau School District 4.1.567 115,353 117,660 117,660 120,013 120,013 122,413 122,413 12.4,861 1,798;950 Cape Girardeau Public library= 03152 9.747 8,922 9,922 9,101 9,101 9,293 9,293 9468 135,655 Commercial Surtax 03690 10,240 10,445 10,445 10,654 10,654 10,867 10,967 11,031 15&,949 5.5336 5 151.951 S 155.050 5 155.050 5 161211 S 161:111 5 161.135 5 164.135 S 167.723 5 2 X11 City of Cape Girardeau (River Campus Arts Expansion Project) COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS PLAN FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GIL kEBELL Table of Contents Project Assumptions Summary of Property Tax Abatement Projected Real Property Tax Revenues if Project is Not Built Projected Real Property Tax Revenues if Project is Built (Without Abatement) Projected Real Property PILOTS if Project is Built Projected Tax Abatement if Project is Built Sales Tax Exemption This information is provided based on the factual information and assumptions provided to Gilmore & Bell, P.C. by a party to or a representative of a party to the proposed transaction. This information is intended to provide factual information only and is provided in conjunction with our legal representation. It is not intended as financial advice or a financial recommendation to any party. Gilmore & Bell, P.C. is not a financial advisor or a "municipal advisor" as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Project Assumptions • Appraised value of Project Site and existing structures $ 400,800 • Assessed value as a percentage of appraised value (commercial) 32.0% • Assessed value of Project Site and existing structures $ 128,260 • Estimated costs of Phase 1 $ 4,000,000 • Estimated costs of Phase 2 $ 5,000,000 • Appraised value of Phase 1 after completion (90% of estimated costs) $ 3,600,000 • Appraised value of Phase 2 after completion (90% of estimated costs) $ 4,500,000 • Assessed value of Phase 1 after completion (commercial) $ 1,152,000 • Assessed value of Phase 2 after completion (commercial) $ 1,440,000 • Initial year Phase 1 taxes assessed 2022 • Initial year Phase 2 taxes assessed 2023 • Bi -annual growth rate of appraised values 2.0% • Each Phase's taxes are abated at 100% for 15 years -1- Summary of Property Tax Abatement -2- Projected Real Projected Real Property Tax Property Tax Revenues if Project Projected Real Projected Tax Commercial Revenues if Project is Built (Without Property PILOTs if Abatement if Project Taxing Jurisdiction Tax Rate is Not Built Abatement) Project is Built is Built State of Missouri 0.0300 $ 667 $ 12,911 $ - $ 12,506 County of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 0.0750 1,668 32,278 - 31,266 County of Cape Girardeau - Mental Health 0.0772 1,717 33,225 - 32,183 County of Cape Girardeau - Public Health 0.0960 2,135 41,316 - 40,021 County of Cape Girardeau - Senior Services 0.0478 1,063 20,572 - 19,927 County of Cape Girardeau - Developmentally Disabled 0.0553 1,230 23,800 - 23,053 City of Cape Girardeau - General 0.3044 6,769 131,007 - 126,898 City of Cape Girardeau - Health 0.0570 1,268 24,532 - 23,762 Cape Girardeau School District 4.1567 92,433 1,788,950 - 1,732,845 Cape Girardeau Public Library 0.3152 7,009 135,655 - 131,401 Commercial Surtax 0.3690 8,206 158,809 - 153,829 5.5836 1 $ 124,164 $ 2,403,056 $ - $ 2,327,691 -2- Projected Real Property Tax Revenues if Project is Not Built Estimated Assessed Value of Project Site $ 128,260 $ 130,825 $ 130,825 $ 133,442 $ 133,442 $ 136,111 $ 136,111 $ 138,833 Tax Rate Tax Rate Taxing Jurisdiction per $100 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 State of Missouri 0.0300 $ 38 $ 39 $ 39 $ 40 $ 40 $ 41 $ 41 $ 42 County of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 0.0750 96 98 98 100 100 102 102 104 County of Cape Girardeau - Mental Health 0.0772 99 101 101 103 103 105 105 107 County of Cape Girardeau - Public Health 0.0960 123 126 126 128 128 131 131 133 County of Cape Girardeau - Senior Services 0.0478 61 63 63 64 64 65 65 66 County of Cape Girardeau - Developmentally Disabled 0.0553 71 72 72 74 74 75 75 77 City of Cape Girardeau - General 0.3044 390 398 398 406 406 414 414 423 City of Cape Girardeau - Health 0.0570 73 75 75 76 76 78 78 79 Cape Girardeau School District 4.1567 5,331 5,438 5,438 5,547 5,547 5,658 5,658 5,771 Cape Girardeau Public Library 0.3152 404 412 412 421 421 429 429 438 Commercial Surtax 0.3690 473 483 483 492 492 502 502 512 464 5.5836 $ 7,162 $ 7,305 $ 7,305 $ 7,451 $ 7,451 $ 7,600 $ 7,600 $ 7,752 Estimated Assessed Value of Project Site $ 138,833 $ 141,609 $ 141,609 $ 144,442 $ 144,442 $ 147,330 $ 147,330 $ 150,277 Tax Rate Taxing Jurisdiction per $100 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 Total State of Missouri 0.0300 $ 42 $ 42 $ 42 $ 43 $ 43 $ 44 $ 44 $ 45 $ 667 County of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 0.0750 104 106 106 108 108 111 111 113 1,668 County of Cape Girardeau - Mental Health 0.0772 107 109 109 112 112 114 114 116 1,717 County of Cape Girardeau - Public Health 0.0960 133 136 136 139 139 141 141 144 2,135 County of Cape Girardeau - Senior Services 0.0478 66 68 68 69 69 70 70 72 1,063 County of Cape Girardeau - Developmentally Disabled 0.0553 77 78 78 80 80 81 81 83 1,230 City of Cape Girardeau - General 0.3044 423 431 431 440 440 448 448 457 6,769 City of Cape Girardeau - Health 0.0570 79 81 81 82 82 84 84 86 1,268 Cape Girardeau School District 4.1567 5,771 5,886 5,886 6,004 6,004 6,124 6,124 6,247 92,433 Cape Girardeau Public Library 0.3152 438 446 446 455 455 464 464 474 7,009 Commercial Surtax 0.3690 512 523 523 533 533 544 544 555 8,206 5.5836 $ 7,752 $ 7,907 $ 7,907 $ 8,065 $ 8,065 $ 8,226 $ 8,226 $ 8,391 $ 124,164 -3- Projected Real Property Tax Revenues if Project is Built (Without Abatement) Estimated Assessed Value of Phase Estimated Assessed Value of Phase 2 Estimated Assessed Value of Project (Both Phases) $ $ $ 1,152,000 - 1,152,000 $ $ $ 1,175,040 1,440,000 2,615,040 $ $ $ 1,175,040 1,440,000 2,615,040 $ $ $ 1,198,541 1,468,800 2,667,341 $ $ $ 1,198,541 1,468,800 2,667,341 $ $ $ 1,222,512 1,498,176 2,720,688 $ $ $ 1,222,512 1,498,176 2,720,688 $ $ $ 1,246,962 1,528,140 2,775,101 Tax Rate Tax Rate Taxing Jurisdiction per $100 Taxing Jurisdiction 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 State of Missouri 0.0300 $ 346 $ 785 $ 785 $ 800 $ 800 $ 816 $ 816 $ 833 County of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 0.0750 901 864 County of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 1,961 1,961 2,001 2,001 2,041 2,041 2,081 County of Cape Girardeau - Mental Health 0.0772 889 32,278 2,019 0.0772 2,019 2,142 2,059 2,185 2,059 2,185 2,100 2,229 2,100 2,229 2,142 County of Cape Girardeau - Public Health 0.0960 2,274 1,106 2,319 2,510 County of Cape Girardeau - Public Health 2,510 2,561 2,561 2,612 2,612 2,664 County of Cape Girardeau - Senior Services 0.0478 551 1,250 41,316 1,250 0.0478 1,275 1,327 1,275 1,353 1,300 1,353 1,300 1,380 1,327 County of Cape Girardeau - Developmentally Disabled 0.0553 1,408 637 1,408 1,446 1,436 1,446 County of Cape Girardeau - Developmentally Disabled 1,475 1,475 1,505 1,505 1,535 City of Cape Girardeau - General 0.3044 3,507 7,960 7,960 23,800 8,119 0.3044 8,119 8,447 8,282 8,616 8,282 8,616 8,447 City of Cape Girardeau - Health 0.0570 8,789 657 8,964 1,491 8,964 1,491 9,144 1,520 City of Cape Girardeau - Health 1,520 1,551 1,551 1,582 Cape Girardeau School District 4.1567 47,885 108,699 108,699 110,873 24,532 110,873 4.1567 113,091 115,353 113,091 117,660 115,353 Cape Girardeau Public Library 0.3152 120,013 3,631 120,013 8,243 122,413 8,243 122,413 8,407 124,861 8,407 Cape Girardeau Public Library 8,576 8,576 8,747 Commercial Surtax 0.3690 4,251 9,650 9,650 9,842 9,842 135,655 10,039 0.3690 10,039 10,240 10,240 10,445 5.5836 $ 64,323 $ 146,013 $ 146,013 $ 148,934 $ 148,934 $ 151,912 $ 151,912 $ 154,951 Estimated Assessed Value of Phase 1 Estimated Assessed Value of Phase 2 Estimated Assessed Value of Project (Both Phases) $ $ $ 1,246,962 1,528,140 2,775,101 $ $ $ 1,271,901 1,558,702 2,830,603 $ $ $ 1,271,901 1,558,702 2,830,603 $ $ $ 1,297,339 1,589,876 2,887,215 $ $ $ 1,297,339 1,589,876 2,887,215 $ $ $ 1,323,286 1,621,674 2,944,960 $ $ $ 1,323,286 1,621,674 2,944,960 $ $ $ 1,349,752 1,654,107 3,003,859 Tax Rate Taxing Jurisdiction per $100 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 Total State of Missouri 0.0300 $ 833 $ 849 $ 849 $ 866 $ 866 $ 883 $ 883 $ 901 $ 12,911 County of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 0.0750 2,081 2,123 2,123 2,165 2,165 2,209 2,209 2,253 32,278 County of Cape Girardeau - Mental Health 0.0772 2,142 2,185 2,185 2,229 2,229 2,274 2,274 2,319 33,225 County of Cape Girardeau - Public Health 0.0960 2,664 2,717 2,717 2,772 2,772 2,827 2,827 2,884 41,316 County of Cape Girardeau - Senior Services 0.0478 1,327 1,353 1,353 1,380 1,380 1,408 1,408 1,436 20,572 County of Cape Girardeau - Developmentally Disabled 0.0553 1,535 1,565 1,565 1,597 1,597 1,629 1,629 1,661 23,800 City of Cape Girardeau - General 0.3044 8,447 8,616 8,616 8,789 8,789 8,964 8,964 9,144 131,007 City of Cape Girardeau - Health 0.0570 1,582 1,613 1,613 1,646 1,646 1,679 1,679 1,712 24,532 Cape Girardeau School District 4.1567 115,353 117,660 117,660 120,013 120,013 122,413 122,413 124,861 1,788,950 Cape Girardeau Public Library 0.3152 8,747 8,922 8,922 9,101 9,101 9,283 9,283 9,468 135,655 Commercial Surtax 0.3690 10,240 10,445 10,445 10,654 10,654 10,867 10,867 11,084 158,809 5.5836 $ 154,951 $ 158,050 $ 158,050 $ 161,211 $ 161,211 $ 164,435 $ 164,435 $ 167,723 $ 2,403,056 -4- Projected Real Property PILOTS if Project is Built Estimated Assessed Value of Project(Total) $ 1,152,000 $ 2,615,040 $ 2,615,040 $ 2,667,341 $ 2,667,341 $ 2,720,688 $ 2,720,688 $ 2,775,101 $ 2,775,101 $ 2,830,603 $ 2,830,603 $ 2,887,215 $ 2,887,215 $ 2,944,960 $ 2,944,960 $ 3,003,859 Tax Rate per Taxing Jurisdiction $100 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 Total State of Missouri 0.0300 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - County of Cape Girardeau - General Revenue 0.0750 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - County of Cape Girardeau -Mental Health 0.0772 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - County of Cape Girardeau - Public Health 0.0960 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - County of Cape Girardeau - Senior Services 0.0478 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - County of Cape Girardeau - Developmentally Disabled 0.0553 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City of Cape Girardeau - General 0.3044 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City of Cape Girardeau - Health 0.0570 Cape Girardeau School District 4.1567 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cape Girardeau Public Library 0.3152 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Commercial Surtax 0.3690 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5.5836 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -5- Taxing Jurisdiction Projected Tax Abatement if Project is Built Tax Rate per$1001 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 Total State of Missouri 0.0300 $ 346 $ 785 $ 785 $ 800 $ 800 $ 816 $ 816 $ 833 $ 833 $ 849 $ 849 $ 866 $ 866 $ 883 $ 883 $ 496 $ 12,506 County of Cape Girardeau- General Revenue 0.0750 864 1,961 1,961 2,001 2,001 2,041 2,041 2,081 2,081 2,123 2,123 2,165 2,165 2,209 2,209 1,241 31,266 County of Cape Girardeau - Mental Health 0.0772 889 2,019 2,019 2,059 2,059 2,100 2,100 2,142 2,142 2,185 2,185 2,229 2,229 2,274 2,274 1,277 32,183 County of Cape Girardeau - Public Health 0.0960 1,106 2,510 2,510 2,561 2,561 2,612 2,612 2,664 2,664 2,717 2,717 2,772 2,772 2,827 2,827 1,588 40,021 County of Cape Girardeau - Senior Services 0.0478 551 1,250 1,250 1,275 1,275 1,300 1,300 1,327 1,327 1,353 1,353 1,380 1,380 1,408 1,408 791 19,927 County of Cape Girardeau- Developmentally Disabled 0.0553 637 1,446 1,446 1,475 1,475 1,505 1,505 1,535 1,535 1,565 1,565 1,597 1,597 1,629 1,629 915 23,053 City of Cape Girardeau - General 0.3044 3,507 7,960 7,960 8,119 8,119 8,282 8,282 8,447 8,447 8,616 8,616 8,789 8,789 8,964 8,964 5,035 126,898 City of Cape Girardeau - Health 0.0570 657 1,491 1,491 1,520 1,520 1,551 1,551 1,582 1,582 1,613 1,613 1,646 1,646 1,679 1,679 943 23,762 Cape Girardeau School District 4.1567 47,885 108,699 108,699 110,873 110,873 113,091 113,091 115,353 115,353 117,660 117,660 120,013 120,013 122,413 122,413 68,756 1,732,845 Cape Girardeau Public Library 0.3152 3,631 8,243 8,243 8,407 8,407 8,576 8,576 8,747 8,747 8,922 8,922 9,101 9,101 9,283 9,283 5,214 131,401 Commercial Surtax 0.3690 4,251 9,650 9,650 9,842 9,842 10,039 10,039 10,240 10,240 10,445 10,445 10,654 10,654 10,867 10,867 6,104 153,829 -6- Sales Tax MO County City Use Tax MO County City State County City TOTAL Cost of Construction Materials Sales Tax Exemption 4.225% 1.500% 2.750% 4.225% 1.500% Sales Tax $ 121,680.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 4,950.00 $ 137,430.00 $3,600,000 -7- Use Tax $ 30,420.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 41,220.00 Total $ 152,100.00 $ 21,600.00 $ 4,950.00 $ 178,650.00 Gayle L. Conrad, CMC/MPCC, Staff: Director of Citizen Services/City Agenda: Clerk 1/19/2021 SUBJECT Authorizing an Agreement with Tyler Technologies, Inc. for hosting services for a Tyler software package utilized by numerous departments and offices, including utility billing, finance and accounting, licensing, code enforcement, human resources, work orders and others. EXECUTIVE SUMN ARY In 2012 the City contracted with Tyler Technologies to purchase and implement a software package (Mums) to manage functions and operations for many city departments, replacing outdated and end -of -life software. Tyler Technologies was selected after a competitive RFP process, interviews, product demonstrations, and extensive employee and end user review. At that time, it was determined it was best for the City to host the software and all city data on-site. A server system was designed, built and installed at City Hall, with Tyler Technologies providing disaster recovery services with system backups generated daily and stored off-site. Since 2012, the use of the Tyler software package has exponentially grown in use by all departments and has outgrown the current in-house IT resources available to manage the system. Therefore, staff is recommending the City's Tyler/Munis system be transitioned to a system hosted by Tyler Technologies, Inc. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Tyler software package implementation over the past eight years has allowed the city to improve and streamline processes, has provided better information for management decisions, and has enhanced tools to interact with and provide innovative processes for our customers. Currently, 28 different Tyler/Munis modules are being utilized by the City. Every department in the city utilizes a module, and most use multiple modules. With the increased use of this system has come an increased need for technical support, system maintenance, data storage, and server upgrades. In addition, the maintenance of our entire system rests on our internal IT staff. Support of the Tyler system requires a majority of the City's IT Manager's time on a daily basis, as well as half the time of another IT staff member. It has has grown beyond what can be supported internally, both in time and hardware needs. In addition, industry -wide security of network systems and data has become an increasing concern. As has been very evident over the past year, more and more entities are experiencing cyber -attacks and data breaches. The security industry has been challenged to keep up with the rapidly changing and increased knowledge of system hackers and cyber -security threats. As the city's system has grown, the move to a SaaS hosted system has been repeatedly discussed and reviewed internally. After the cyber -attack of 2020, these discussions became more serious, and a more in-depth review of our system was completed. These discussions and system review have led to the recommendation that our Tyler software system be moved from a self -hosted environment to an off-site Tyler Technologies SaaS hosted system. FINANCIAL IMPACT The one-time cost for moving to a hosted system is $9,000. The annual maintenance for the next three years will be $131,428 per year. This past year the City paid $78,648 for annual maintenance, with a 3% annual increase. In addition the City pays $1,800 per year for disaster recovery off-site storage There are also costs for server replacement, server maintenance, additional storage, security, and backup. Currently the IT Manager spends a majority of his time maintaining the Tyler system, which has taken him away from other necessary job functions. The Manager also works nights and weekends to maintain and update the system to avoid system downtime for the end users. In March the Council adopted Ordinance No. 5269 appropriating monies from the Emergency Reserve Fund for operating and capital expenditures in response to the January 2020 cyber attack. The final deciding factor in moving to a hosted system was the result of this cyber attack, and to significantly reduce the city's risk, of any future data or security breach. The increase in the annual maintenance cost for the term of this agreement will be funded from this appropriation. SUSTAINABILITY: ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS Going hosted with Tyler Technologies puts the city's enter Tyler software system in a multi-million dollar data center that provides a level of security and reliability the City cannot match. Tyler has a network operation center (NOC) that operates 7/24/365 monitoring their equipment. All system upgrades, enhancements, patches and fixes are completed by Tyler. They have redundant internet, power feeds, battery backup system and multiple generators to make sure the data center never goes dark. The Saas Agreement provides a 5% credit if Tyler does not meet its Service Level Agreement (SLA) of the city's system being up 7/24/365. Following are the issues that the city currently faces that will be resolved by moving to a hosted environment: • The City has no insurance for general down time, other than cyber insurance in the instance of a cyber attack. • The City does not have a redundant network system. The in-depth knowledge and maintenance of our system lies in one person, the IT Manager. • The City's battery backup system provides only 25 minutes of run time in the event of loss of power. • Security is dependent on our internal IT staff, and mostly the IT Manager, staying up to date on the rapidly change technology industry and the ability for hackers to infiltrate systems. • Our current server system is at end of life and must be replaced. It routinely "freezes" and is monitored 24/7, and requires response from our IT Manager at all times. • All software updates are performed on weekends by the IT Manager to avoid system downtime. • Other than more space for a server room, these same issues will continue even with a move to the new City Hall. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a software hosting agreement with Tyler Technologies, Inc. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: Aereement.Software Hostin,g.TvlerTech.doc Resolution © SaaS A¢reement.Draft.2020-01-12.pdf Software As A Service Agreement BILL NO. 21-09 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., FOR SOFTWARE HOSTING SERVICES, IN THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1. The City Manager, for and on behalf of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, is hereby authorized to execute a Software as a Service Agreement with Tyler Technologies, Inc., for software hosting services, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. The Agreement shall be in substantially the form attached hereto, which document is hereby approved by the City Council, and incorporated herein by reference, with such changes therein as shall be approved by the officers of the City executing the same. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 2021. Bob Fox, Mayor ATTEST: Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk • tyler • technologies SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE AGREEMENT This Software as a Service Agreement is made between Tyler Technologies, Inc. and Client. WHEREAS, Client selected Tyler to provide certain products and services set forth in the Investment Summary, including providing Client with access to Tyler's proprietary software products, and Tyler desires to provide such products and services under the terms of this Agreement; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and promises set forth in this Agreement, Tyler and Client agree as follows: SECTION A — DEFINITIONS • "Agreement" means this Software as a Services Agreement. • "Business Travel Policy" means our business travel policy. A copy of our current Business Travel Policy is attached as Schedule 1 to Exhibit B. • "Client" means City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. • "Data" means your data necessary to utilize the Tyler Software. • "Data Storage Capacity" means the contracted amount of storage capacity for your Data identified in the Investment Summary. • "Defect" means a failure of the Tyler Software to substantially conform to the functional descriptions set forth in our written proposal to you, or their functional equivalent. Future functionality may be updated, modified, or otherwise enhanced through our maintenance and support services, and the governing functional descriptions for such future functionality will be set forth in our then -current Documentation. • "Defined Users" means the number of users that are authorized to use the SaaS Services. The Defined Users for the Agreement are as identified in the Investment Summary. • "Developer" means a third party who owns the intellectual property rights to Third Party Software. • "Documentation" means any online or written documentation related to the use or functionality of the Tyler Software that we provide or otherwise make available to you, including instructions, user guides, manuals and other training or self-help documentation. • "Effective Date" means the date by which both your and our authorized representatives have signed the Agreement. • "Force Majeure" means an event beyond the reasonable control of you or us, including, without limitation, governmental action, war, riot or civil commotion, fire, natural disaster, or any other cause that could not with reasonable diligence be foreseen or prevented by you or us. • "Investment Summary" means the agreed upon cost proposal for the products and services attached as Exhibit A. • "Invoicing and Payment Policy" means the invoicing and payment policy. A copy of our current Invoicing and Payment Policy is attached as Exhibit B. • "SaaS Fees" means the fees for the SaaS Services identified in the Investment Summary. ••., tyler • "SaaS Services" means software as a service consisting of system administration, system management, and system monitoring activities that Tyler performs for the Tyler Software, and includes the right to access and use the Tyler Software, receive maintenance and support on the Tyler Software, including Downtime resolution under the terms of the SLA, and Data storage and archiving. SaaS Services do not include support of an operating system or hardware, support outside of our normal business hours, or training, consulting or other professional services. • "SLA" means the service level agreement. A copy of our current SLA is attached hereto as Exhibit C. • "Support Call Process" means the support call process applicable to all of our customers who have licensed the Tyler Software. A copy of our current Support Call Process is attached as Schedule 1 to Exhibit C. • "Third Party Hardware" means the third party hardware, if any, identified in the Investment Summary. • "Third Party Products" means the Third Party Software and Third Party Hardware. • "Third Party Services" means the third party services, if any, identified in the Investment Summary. • "Third Party Software" means the third party software, if any, identified in the Investment Summary. • "Third Party Terms" means, if any, the end user license agreement(s) or similar terms for the Third Party Software, as applicable and attached as Exhibit D. • "Tyler" means Tyler Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation. • "Tyler Software" means our proprietary software, including any integrations, custom modifications, and/or other related interfaces identified in the Investment Summary and licensed by us to you through this Agreement. • "we", "us", "our" and similar terms mean Tyler. • "you" and similar terms mean Client. SECTION B — SAAS SERVICES 1. Rights Granted. We grant to you the non-exclusive, non -assignable limited right to use the SaaS Services solely for your internal business purposes for the number of Defined Users only. The Tyler Software will be made available to you according to the terms of the SLA. You acknowledge that we have no delivery obligations and we will not ship copies of the Tyler Software as part of the SaaS Services. You may use the SaaS Services to access updates and enhancements to the Tyler Software, as further described in Section C(9). The foregoing notwithstanding, to the extent we have sold you perpetual licenses for Tyler Software, if and listed in the Investment Summary, for which you are receiving SaaS Services, your rights to use such Tyler Software are perpetual, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement including, without limitation, Section B(4). We will make any such software available to you for download. 2. SaaS Fees. You agree to pay us the SaaS Fees. Those amounts are payable in accordance with our Invoicing and Payment Policy. The SaaS Fees are based on the number of Defined Users and amount of Data Storage Capacity. You may add additional users or additional data storage capacity on the terms set forth in Section H(1). In the event you regularly and/or meaningfully exceed the Defined Users or Data Storage Capacity, we reserve the right to charge you additional fees commensurate with the overage(s). •• tyler 3. Ownership. 3.1 We retain all ownership and intellectual property rights to the SaaS Services, the Tyler Software, and anything developed by us under this Agreement. You do not acquire under this Agreement any license to use the Tyler Software in excess of the scope and/or duration of the SaaS Services. 3.2 The Documentation is licensed to you and may be used and copied by your employees for internal, non-commercial reference purposes only. 3.3 You retain all ownership and intellectual property rights to the Data. You expressly recognize that except to the extent necessary to carry out our obligations contained in this Agreement, we do not create or endorse any Data used in connection with the SaaS Services. 4. Restrictions. You may not: (a) make the Tyler Software or Documentation resulting from the SaaS Services available in any manner to any third party for use in the third party's business operations; (b) modify, make derivative works of, disassemble, reverse compile, or reverse engineer any part of the SaaS Services; (c) access or use the SaaS Services in order to build or support, and/or assist a third party in building or supporting, products or services competitive to us; or (d) license, sell, rent, lease, transfer, assign, distribute, display, host, outsource, disclose, permit timesharing or service bureau use, or otherwise commercially exploit or make the SaaS Services, Tyler Software, or Documentation available to any third party other than as expressly permitted by this Agreement. 5. Software Warranty. We warrant that the Tyler Software will perform without Defects during the term of this Agreement. If the Tyler Software does not perform as warranted, we will use all reasonable efforts, consistent with industry standards, to cure the Defect in accordance with the maintenance and support process set forth in Section C(9), below, the SLA and our then current Support Call Process. 6. SaaS Services. 6.1 Our SaaS Services are audited at least yearly in accordance with the AICPA's Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements ("SSAE") No. 18. We have attained, and will maintain, SOC 1 and SOC 2 compliance, or its equivalent, for so long as you are timely paying for SaaS Services. Upon execution of a mutually agreeable Non -Disclosure Agreement ("NDA"), we will provide you with a summary of our compliance report(s) or its equivalent. Every year thereafter, for so long as the NDA is in effect and in which you make a written request, we will provide that same information. 6.2 You will be hosted on shared hardware in a Tyler data center or in a third -party data center. In either event, databases containing your Data will be dedicated to you and inaccessible to our other customers. 6.3 Our Tyler data centers have fully -redundant telecommunications access, electrical power, and the required hardware to provide access to the Tyler Software in the event of a disaster or component failure. In the event any of your Data has been lost or damaged due to an act or omission of Tyler or its subcontractors or due to a defect in Tyler's software, we will use best commercial efforts to restore all the Data on servers in accordance with the architectural design's capabilities and with the goal of minimizing any Data loss as greatly as possible. In no •• tyler case shall the recovery point objective ("RPO") exceed a maximum of twenty-four (24) hours from declaration of disaster. For purposes of this subsection, RPO represents the maximum tolerable period during which your Data may be lost, measured in relation to a disaster we declare, said declaration will not be unreasonably withheld. 6.4 In the event we declare a disaster, our Recovery Time Objective ("RTO") is twenty-four (24) hours. For purposes of this subsection, RTO represents the amount of time, after we declare a disaster, within which your access to the Tyler Software must be restored. 6.5 We conduct annual penetration testing of either the production network and/or web application to be performed. We will maintain industry standard intrusion detection and prevention systems to monitor malicious activity in the network and to log and block any such activity. We will provide you with a written or electronic record of the actions taken by us in the event that any unauthorized access to your database(s) is detected as a result of our security protocols. We will undertake an additional security audit, on terms and timing to be mutually agreed to by the parties, at your written request. You may not attempt to bypass or subvert security restrictions in the SaaS Services or environments related to the Tyler Software. Unauthorized attempts to access files, passwords or other confidential information, and unauthorized vulnerability and penetration test scanning of our network and systems (hosted or otherwise) is prohibited without the prior written approval of our IT Security Officer. 6.6 We test our disaster recovery plan on an annual basis. Our standard test is not client -specific. Should you request a client -specific disaster recovery test, we will work with you to schedule and execute such a test on a mutually agreeable schedule. At your written request, we will provide test results to you within a commercially reasonable timeframe after receipt of the request. 6.7 We will be responsible for importing back-up and verifying that you can log -in. You will be responsible for running reports and testing critical processes to verify the returned Data. 6.8 We provide secure Data transmission paths between each of your workstations and our servers. 6.9 Tyler data centers are accessible only by authorized personnel with a unique key entry. All other visitors to Tyler data centers must be signed in and accompanied by authorized personnel. Entry attempts to the data center are regularly audited by internal staff and external auditors to ensure no unauthorized access. 6.10 Where applicable with respect to our applications that take or process card payment data, we are responsible for the security of cardholder data that we possess, including functions relating to storing, processing, and transmitting of the cardholder data and affirm that, as of the Effective Date, we comply with applicable requirements to be considered PCI DSS compliant and have performed the necessary steps to validate compliance with the PCI DSS. We agree to supply the current status of our PCI DSS compliance program in the form of an official Attestation of Compliance, which can be found at https://www.tylertech.com/about- us/compliance, and in the event of any change in our status, will comply with applicable notice requirements. •• tyler 4 SECTION C —PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1. Professional Services. We will provide you the various implementation -related services itemized in the Investment Summary and described in our industry standard implementation plan. We will finalize that documentation with you upon execution of this Agreement. 2. Professional Services Fees. You agree to pay us the professional services fees in the amounts set forth in the Investment Summary. Those amounts are payable in accordance with our Invoicing and Payment Policy. You acknowledge that the fees stated in the Investment Summary are good -faith estimates of the amount of time and materials required for your implementation. We will bill you the actual fees incurred based on the in -scope services provided to you. Any discrepancies in the total values set forth in the Investment Summary will be resolved by multiplying the applicable hourly rate by the quoted hours. 3. Additional Services. The Investment Summary contains the scope of services and related costs (including programming and/or interface estimates) required for the project based on our understanding of the specifications you supplied. If additional work is required, or if you use or request additional services, we will provide you with an addendum or change order, as applicable, outlining the costs for the additional work. The price quotes in the addendum or change order will be valid for thirty (30) days from the date of the quote. 4. Cancellation. If travel is required, we will make all reasonable efforts to schedule travel for our personnel, including arranging travel reservations, at least two (2) weeks in advance of commitments. Therefore, if you cancel services less than two (2) weeks in advance (other than for Force Majeure or breach by us), you will be liable for all (a) non-refundable expenses incurred by us on your behalf, and (b) daily fees associated with cancelled professional services if we are unable to reassign our personnel. We will make all reasonable efforts to reassign personnel in the event you cancel within two (2) weeks of scheduled commitments. 5. Services Warranty. We will perform the services in a professional, workmanlike manner, consistent with industry standards. In the event we provide services that do not conform to this warranty, we will re -perform such services at no additional cost to you. 6. Site Access and Requirements. At no cost to us, you agree to provide us with full and free access to your personnel, facilities, and equipment as may be reasonably necessary for us to provide implementation services, subject to any reasonable security protocols or other written policies provided to us as of the Effective Date, and thereafter as mutually agreed to by you and us. 7. Background Checks. For at least the past twelve (12) years, all of our employees have undergone criminal background checks prior to hire. All employees sign our confidentiality agreement and security policies. 8. Client Assistance. You acknowledge that the implementation of the Tyler Software is a cooperative process requiring the time and resources of your personnel. You agree to use all reasonable efforts to cooperate with and assist us as may be reasonably required to meet the agreed upon project deadlines and other milestones for implementation. This cooperation includes at least working with us to schedule the implementation -related services outlined in this Agreement. We will not be liable for failure to meet any deadlines and milestones when such failure is due to Force Majeure or •• tyler to the failure by your personnel to provide such cooperation and assistance (either through action or omission). 9. Maintenance and Support. For so long as you timely pay your SaaS Fees according to the Invoicing and Payment Policy, then in addition to the terms set forth in the SLA and the Support Call Process, we will: 9.1 perform our maintenance and support obligations in a professional, good, and workmanlike manner, consistent with industry standards, to resolve Defects in the Tyler Software (subject to any applicable release life cycle policy); 9.2 provide support during our established support hours; 9.3 maintain personnel that are sufficiently trained to be familiar with the Tyler Software and Third Party Software, if any, in order to provide maintenance and support services; 9.4 make available to you all releases to the Tyler Software (including updates and enhancements) that we make generally available without additional charge to customers who have a maintenance and support agreement in effect; and 9.5 provide non -Defect resolution support of prior releases of the Tyler Software in accordance with any applicable release life cycle policy. We will use all reasonable efforts to perform support services remotely. Currently, we use a third -party secure unattended connectivity tool called Bomgar, as well as GotoAssist by Citrix. Therefore, you agree to maintain a high-speed internet connection capable of connecting us to your PCs and server(s). You agree to provide us with a login account and local administrative privileges as we may reasonably require to perform remote services. We will, at our option, use the secure connection to assist with proper diagnosis and resolution, subject to any reasonably applicable security protocols. If we cannot resolve a support issue remotely, we may be required to provide onsite services. In such event, we will be responsible for our travel expenses, unless it is determined that the reason onsite support was required was a reason outside our control. Either way, you agree to provide us with full and free access to the Tyler Software, working space, adequate facilities within a reasonable distance from the equipment, and use of machines, attachments, features, or other equipment reasonably necessary for us to provide the maintenance and support services, all at no charge to us. We strongly recommend that you also maintain your VPN for backup connectivity purposes. For the avoidance of doubt, SaaS Fees do not include the following services: (a) onsite support (unless Tyler cannot remotely correct a Defect in the Tyler Software, as set forth above); (b) application design; (c) other consulting services; or (d) support outside our normal business hours as listed in our then - current Support Call Process. Requested services such as those outlined in this section will be billed to you on a time and materials basis at our then current rates. You must request those services with at least one (1) weeks' advance notice. SECTION D — THIRD PARTY PRODUCTS 1. Third Party Hardware. We will sell, deliver, and install onsite the Third Party Hardware, if you have purchased any, for the price set forth in the Investment Summary. Those amounts are payable in •• , tyler H. accordance with our Invoicing and Payment Policy. 2. Third Party Software. As part of the SaaS Services, you will receive access to the Third Party Software and related documentation for internal business purposes only. Your rights to the Third Party Software will be governed by the Third Party Terms. 3. Third Partv Products Warranties 3.1 We are authorized by each Developer to grant access to the Third Party Software. 3.2 The Third Party Hardware will be new and unused, and upon payment in full, you will receive free and clear title to the Third Party Hardware. 3.3 You acknowledge that we are not the manufacturer of the Third Party Products. We do not warrant or guarantee the performance of the Third Party Products. However, we grant and pass through to you any warranty that we may receive from the Developer or supplier of the Third Party Products. 4. Third Party Services. If you have purchased Third Party Services, those services will be provided independent of Tyler by such third -party at the rates set forth in the Investment Summary and in accordance with our Invoicing and Payment Policy. SECTION E - INVOICING AND PAYMENT; INVOICE DISPUTES 1. Invoicing and Payment. We will invoice you the SaaS Fees and fees for other professional services in the Investment Summary per our Invoicing and Payment Policy, subject to Section E(2). 2. Invoice Disputes. If you believe any delivered software or service does not conform to the warranties in this Agreement, you will provide us with written notice within thirty (30) days of your receipt of the applicable invoice. The written notice must contain reasonable detail of the issues you contend are in dispute so that we can confirm the issue and respond to your notice with either a justification of the invoice, an adjustment to the invoice, or a proposal addressing the issues presented in your notice. We will work with you as may be necessary to develop an action plan that outlines reasonable steps to be taken by each of us to resolve any issues presented in your notice. You may withhold payment of the amount(s) actually in dispute, and only those amounts, until we complete the action items outlined in the plan. If we are unable to complete the action items outlined in the action plan because of your failure to complete the items agreed to be done by you, then you will remit full payment of the invoice. We reserve the right to suspend delivery of all SaaS Services, including maintenance and support services, if you fail to pay an invoice not disputed as described above within fifteen (15) days of notice of our intent to do so. SECTION IF —TERM AND TERMINATION 1. Term. The initial term of this Agreement is three (3) years from the first day of the first month following the Effective Date, unless earlier terminated as set forth below. Upon expiration of the initial term, this Agreement will renew automatically for additional one (1) year renewal terms at our then -current SaaS Fees unless terminated in writing by either party at least sixty (60) days prior to the end of the then -current renewal term. Your right to access or use the Tyler Software and the •• tyler SaaS Services will terminate at the end of this Agreement. 2. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated as set forth below. In the event of termination, you will pay us for all undisputed fees and expenses related to the software, products, and/or services you have received, or we have incurred or delivered, prior to the effective date of termination. Disputed fees and expenses in all terminations other than your termination for cause must have been submitted as invoice disputes in accordance with Section E(2). 2.1 Failure to Pay SaaS Fees. You acknowledge that continued access to the SaaS Services is contingent upon your timely payment of SaaS Fees. If you fail to timely pay the SaaS Fees, we may discontinue the SaaS Services and deny your access to the Tyler Software. We may also terminate this Agreement if you don't cure such failure to pay within forty-five (45) days of receiving written notice of our intent to terminate. 2.2 For Cause. If you believe we have materially breached this Agreement, you will invoke the Dispute Resolution clause set forth in Section H(3). You may terminate this Agreement for cause in the event we do not cure, or create a mutually agreeable action plan to address, a material breach of this Agreement within the thirty (30) day window set forth in Section H(3). 2.3 Force Maieure. Either party has the right to terminate this Agreement if a Force Majeure event suspends performance of the SaaS Services for a period of forty-five (45) days or more. 2.4 Lack of Appropriations. If you should not appropriate or otherwise make available funds sufficient to utilize the SaaS Services, you may unilaterally terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to us. You will not be entitled to a refund or offset of previously paid, but unused SaaS Fees. You agree not to use termination for lack of appropriations as a substitute for termination for convenience. 2.5 Fees for Termination without Cause during Initial Term. If you terminate this Agreement during the initial term for any reason other than cause, Force Majeure, or lack of appropriations, or if we terminate this Agreement during the initial term for your failure to pay SaaS Fees, you shall pay us the following early termination fees: if you terminate during the first year of the initial term, 100% of the SaaS Fees through the date of termination plus 25% of the SaaS Fees then due for the remainder of the initial term; if you terminate during the second year of the initial term, 100% of the SaaS Fees through the date of termination plus 15% of the SaaS Fees then due for the remainder of the initial term; and if you terminate after the second year of the initial term, 100% of the SaaS Fees through the date of termination plus 10% of the SaaS Fees then due for the remainder of the initial term. •• tyler 8 SECTION G — INDEMNIFICATION, LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND INSURANCE 1. Intellectual Property Infringement Indemnification. 1.1 We will defend you against any third party claim(s) that the Tyler Software or Documentation infringes that third party's patent, copyright, or trademark, or misappropriates its trade secrets, and will pay the amount of any resulting adverse final judgment (or settlement to which we consent). You must notify us promptly in writing of the claim and give us sole control over its defense or settlement. You agree to provide us with reasonable assistance, cooperation, and information in defending the claim at our expense. 1.2 Our obligations under this Section G(1) will not apply to the extent the claim or adverse final judgment is based on your use of the Tyler Software in contradiction of this Agreement, including with non -licensed third parties, or your willful infringement. 1.3 If we receive information concerning an infringement or misappropriation claim related to the Tyler Software, we may, at our expense and without obligation to do so, either: (a) procure for you the right to continue its use; (b) modify it to make it non -infringing; or (c) replace it with a functional equivalent, in which case you will stop running the allegedly infringing Tyler Software immediately. Alternatively, we may decide to litigate the claim to judgment, in which case you may continue to use the Tyler Software consistent with the terms of this Agreement. 1.4 If an infringement or misappropriation claim is fully litigated and your use of the Tyler Software is enjoined by a court of competent jurisdiction, in addition to paying any adverse final judgment (or settlement to which we consent), we will, at our option, either: (a) procure the right to continue its use; (b) modify it to make it non -infringing; or (c) replace it with a functional equivalent. This section provides your exclusive remedy for third party copyright, patent, or trademark infringement and trade secret misappropriation claims. 2. General Indemnification. 2.1 We will indemnify and hold harmless you and your agents, officials, and employees from and against any and all third -party claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) for (a) personal injury or property damage to the extent caused by our negligence or willful misconduct; or (b) our violation of PCI -DSS requirements or a law applicable to our performance under this Agreement. You must notify us promptly in writing of the claim and give us sole control over its defense or settlement. You agree to provide us with reasonable assistance, cooperation, and information in defending the claim at our expense. 2.2 To the extent permitted by applicable law, you will indemnify and hold harmless us and our agents, officials, and employees from and against any and all third -party claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) for personal injury or property damage to the extent caused by your negligence or willful misconduct; or (b) your violation of a law applicable to your performance under this Agreement. We will notify you promptly in writing of the claim and will give you sole control over its defense or settlement. We agree to provide you with reasonable assistance, cooperation, and •• tyler information in defending the claim at your expense. 3. DISCLAIMER. EXCEPT FOR THE EXPRESS WARRANTIES PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT AND TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, WE HEREBY DISCLAIM ALL OTHER WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES, DUTIES, OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 4. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, OUR LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER BASED ON A THEORY OF CONTRACT OR TORT, INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE AND STRICT LIABILITY, SHALL BE LIMITED TO YOUR ACTUAL DIRECT DAMAGES, NOT TO EXCEED (A) DURING THE INITIAL TERM, AS SET FORTH IN SECTION F(1), TOTAL FEES PAID AS OF THE TIME OF THE CLAIM; OR (B) DURING ANY RENEWAL TERM, THE THEN -CURRENT ANNUAL SAAS FEES PAYABLE IN THAT RENEWAL TERM. THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT THE PRICES SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT ARE SET IN RELIANCE UPON THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT ALLOWED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, THE EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN DAMAGES, AND EACH SHALL APPLY REGARDLESS OF THE FAILURE OF AN ESSENTIAL PURPOSE OF ANY REMEDY. THE FOREGOING LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL NOT APPLY TO CLAIMS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO SECTIONS G(1) AND G(2). S. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN DAMAGES. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL WE BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, EVEN IF WE HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. 6. Insurance. During the course of performing services under this Agreement, we agree to maintain the following levels of insurance: (a) Commercial General Liability of at least $1,000,000; (b) Automobile Liability of at least $1,000,000; (c) Professional Liability of at least $1,000,000; (d) Workers Compensation complying with applicable statutory requirements; and (e) Excess/Umbrella Liability of at least $5,000,000. We will add you as an additional insured to our Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies, which will automatically add you as an additional insured to our Excess/Umbrella Liability policy as well. We will provide you with copies of certificates of insurance upon your written request. SECTION H — GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Additional Products and Services. You may purchase additional products and services at the rates set forth in the Investment Summary for twelve (12) months from the Effective Date by executing a mutually agreed addendum. If no rate is provided in the Investment Summary, or those twelve (12) months have expired, you may purchase additional products and services at our then -current list price, also by executing a mutually agreed addendum. The terms of this Agreement will control any such additional purchase(s), unless otherwise specifically provided in the addendum. 2. Optional Items. Pricing for any listed optional products and services in the Investment Summary will be valid for twelve (12) months from the Effective Date. 3. Dispute Resolution. You agree to provide us with written notice within thirty (30) days of becoming aware of a dispute. You agree to cooperate with us in trying to reasonably resolve all disputes, 10 including, if requested by either party, appointing a senior representative to meet and engage in good faith negotiations with our appointed senior representative. Senior representatives will convene within thirty (30) days of the written dispute notice, unless otherwise agreed. All meetings and discussions between senior representatives will be deemed confidential settlement discussions not subject to disclosure under Federal Rule of Evidence 408 or any similar applicable state rule. If we fail to resolve the dispute, then the parties shall participate in non-binding mediation in an effort to resolve the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, then either of us may assert our respective rights and remedies in a court of competent jurisdiction. Nothing in this section shall prevent you or us from seeking necessary injunctive relief during the dispute resolution procedures. 4. Taxes. The fees in the Investment Summary do not include any taxes, including, without limitation, sales, use, or excise tax. If you are a tax-exempt entity, you agree to provide us with a tax-exempt certificate. Otherwise, we will pay all applicable taxes to the proper authorities and you will reimburse us for such taxes. If you have a valid direct -pay permit, you agree to provide us with a copy. For clarity, we are responsible for paying our income taxes, both federal and state, as applicable, arising from our performance of this Agreement. 5. Nondiscrimination. We will not discriminate against any person employed or applying for employment concerning the performance of our responsibilities under this Agreement. This discrimination prohibition will apply to all matters of initial employment, tenure, and terms of employment, or otherwise with respect to any matter directly or indirectly relating to employment concerning race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, ancestry, disability that is unrelated to the individual's ability to perform the duties of a particular job or position, height, weight, marital status, or political affiliation. We will post, where appropriate, all notices related to nondiscrimination as may be required by applicable law. 6. E -Verify. We have complied, and will comply, with the E -Verify procedures administered by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Verification Division for all of our employees assigned to your project. 7. Subcontractors. We will not subcontract any services under this Agreement without your prior written consent, not to be unreasonably withheld. 8. Binding Effect; No Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall be for the benefit of, either your or our successor(s) or permitted assign(s). Neither party may assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party; provided, however, your consent is not required for an assignment by us as a result of a corporate reorganization, merger, acquisition, or purchase of substantially all of our assets. 9. Force Majeure. Except for your payment obligations, neither party will be liable for delays in performing its obligations under this Agreement to the extent that the delay is caused by Force Majeure; provided, however, that within ten (10) business days of the Force Majeure event, the party whose performance is delayed provides the other party with written notice explaining the cause and extent thereof, as well as a request for a reasonable time extension equal to the estimated duration of the Force Majeure event. 10. No Intended Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is entered into solely for the benefit of you •• tyler 11 and us. No third party will be deemed a beneficiary of this Agreement, and no third party will have the right to make any claim or assert any right under this Agreement. This provision does not affect the rights of third parties under any Third Party Terms. 11. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between you and us with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes any prior agreements, understandings, and representations, whether written, oral, expressed, implied, or statutory. Purchase orders submitted by you, if any, are for your internal administrative purposes only, and the terms and conditions contained in those purchase orders will have no force or effect. This Agreement may only be modified by a written amendment signed by an authorized representative of each party. 12. Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement will be considered valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 13. No Waiver. In the event that the terms and conditions of this Agreement are not strictly enforced by either party, such non -enforcement will not act as or be deemed to act as a waiver or modification of this Agreement, nor will such non -enforcement prevent such party from enforcing each and every term of this Agreement thereafter. 14. Independent Contractor. We are an independent contractor for all purposes under this Agreement. 15. Notices. All notices or communications required or permitted as a part of this Agreement, such as notice of an alleged material breach for a termination for cause or a dispute that must be submitted to dispute resolution, must be in writing and will be deemed delivered upon the earlier of the following: (a) actual receipt by the receiving party; (b) upon receipt by sender of a certified mail, return receipt signed by an employee or agent of the receiving party; (c) upon receipt by sender of proof of email delivery; or (d) if not actually received, five (5) days after deposit with the United States Postal Service authorized mail center with proper postage (certified mail, return receipt requested) affixed and addressed to the other party at the address set forth on the signature page hereto or such other address as the party may have designated by proper notice. The consequences for the failure to receive a notice due to improper notification by the intended receiving party of a change in address will be borne by the intended receiving party. 16. Client Lists. You agree that we may identify you by name in client lists, marketing presentations, and promotional materials. 17. Confidentiality. Both parties recognize that their respective employees and agents, in the course of performance of this Agreement, may be exposed to confidential information and that disclosure of such information could violate rights to private individuals and entities, including the parties. Confidential information is nonpublic information that a reasonable person would believe to be confidential and includes, without limitation, personal identifying information (e.g., social security numbers) and trade secrets, each as defined by applicable state law. Each party agrees that it will not disclose any confidential information of the other party and further agrees to take all reasonable and appropriate action to prevent such disclosure by its employees or agents. The confidentiality covenants contained herein will survive the termination or cancellation of this Agreement. This obligation of confidentiality will not apply to information that: (a) is in the public domain, either at the time of disclosure or afterwards, except by breach of •• tyler 12 this Agreement by a party or its employees or agents; (b) a party can establish by reasonable proof was in that party's possession at the time of initial disclosure; (c) a party receives from a third party who has a right to disclose it to the receiving party; or (d) is the subject of a legitimate disclosure request under the open records laws or similar applicable public disclosure laws governing this Agreement; provided, however, that in the event you receive an open records or other similar applicable request, you will give us prompt notice and otherwise perform the functions required by applicable law. 18. Business License. In the event a local business license is required for us to perform services hereunder, you will promptly notify us and provide us with the necessary paperwork and/or contact information so that we may timely obtain such license. 19. Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of your state of domicile, without regard to its rules on conflicts of law. 20. Multiple Originals and Authorized Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in multiple originals, any of which will be independently treated as an original document. Any electronic, faxed, scanned, photocopied, or similarly reproduced signature on this Agreement or any amendment hereto will be deemed an original signature and will be fully enforceable as if an original signature. Each party represents to the other that the signatory set forth below is duly authorized to bind that party to this Agreement. 21. Cooperative Procurement. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, we agree that this Agreement may be used as a cooperative procurement vehicle by eligible jurisdictions. We reserve the right to negotiate and customize the terms and conditions set forth herein, including but not limited to pricing, to the scope and circumstances of that cooperative procurement. 22. Contract Documents. This Agreement includes the following exhibits: Exhibit A Investment Summary Exhibit B Invoicing and Payment Policy Schedule 1: Business Travel Policy Exhibit C Service Level Agreement Schedule 1: Support Call Process Exhibit D Third Party Terms [REMAINDER INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK; SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] ••., tyler 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, a duly authorized representative of each party has executed this Agreement as of the date(s) set forth below. Tyler Technologies, Inc. City of Cape Girardeau By: Name: Title: Date: Address for Notices: Tyler Technologies, Inc. One Tyler Drive Yarmouth, ME 04096 Attention: Chief Legal Officer 14 By: Name: Title: Date: Address for Notices: City of Cape Girardeau 401 Independence St Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 Attention: •• tyler Exhibit A • •••'•• tyler • technologies Exhibit A Investment Summary The following Investment Summary details the software and services to be delivered by us to you under the Agreement. This Investment Summary is effective as of the Effective Date. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined will have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Agreement. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLYLIFT BLANK •• tyler �• Quoted By: Sue Sturgis •a .0 tyler Date: 1/6/2021 .. •• Quote Expiration: 7/30/2021 technologies Q p Quote Name: City of Cape Girardeau - ERP -Tyler Hosting Quote Number: 2017-40609-2 Quote Description: Tyler Hosting Services Sales Quotation For City of Cape Girardeau 401 Independence St Cape Girardeau, MO 63703-6224 Phone +1 (573) 339-6325 SaaS Financials: Accounting/GL/BG/AP $13,145.00 3.0 $39,435.00 0 Capital Assets $3,490.00 3.0 $10,470.00 0 Cash Management $2,266.00 3.0 $6,798.00 0 Inventory $3,241.00 3.0 $9,723.00 0 Project & Grant Accounting $2,720.00 3.0 $8,160.00 0 Purchase Orders $3,490.00 3.0 $10,470.00 0 Requisitions $2,266.00 3.0 $6,798.00 0 Asset Maintenance $4,057.00 3.0 $12,171.00 0 Human Capital Management: HR Management $3,490.00 3.0 $10,470.00 0 Payroll WESS $7,298.00 3.0 $21,894.00 0 Recruiting $1,247.00 3.0 $3,741.00 0 Revenue: Accounts Receivable $2,992.00 3.0 $8,976.00 0 Business License $2,720.00 3.0 $8,160.00 0 Central Property File $0.00 3.0 $0.00 0 General Billing $1,360.00 3.0 $4,080.00 0 2017-40609-2 - Tyler Hosting Services CONFIDENTIAL 1 of 5 Maplink GIS Integration Permits & Code Enforcement Tyler Cashiering UB Interface Utility Billing CIS Productivity: Citizen Self Service eProcurement Munis Office Role Tailored Dashboard Tyler Content Manager SE Tyler Forms Processing Tyler Reporting Services Additional: CAFR Statement Builder Concurrent Users (25) Additional Storage 1TB Tyler Incident Management TOTAL: Other Services Project Planning Services VPN Device TOTAL: Summary One Time Fees Total Tyler Software $0.00 Total SaaS $0.00 Total Tyler Services $9,000.00 Total 3rd Party Hardware, Software and $0.00 Services $2,266.00 3.0 $6,798.00 0 $6,355.00 3.0 $19,065.00 0 $4,986.00 3.0 $14,958.00 0 $1,994.00 3.0 $5,982.00 0 $6,573.00 3.0 $19,719.00 0 $2,992.00 3.0 $8,976.00 0 $2,266.00 3.0 $6,798.00 0 $2,266.00 3.0 $6,798.00 0 $2,266.00 3.0 $6,798.00 0 $6,346.00 3.0 $19,038.00 0 $3,611.00 3.0 $10,833.00 0 $4,138.00 3.0 $12,414.00 0 $1,821.00 3.0 $5,463.00 0 $25,000.00 3.0 $75,000.00 0 $2,500.00 3.0 $7,500.00 0 $2,266.00 3.0 $6,798.00 0 $131,428.00 $394,284.00 0 1 $5,000.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 1 $4,000.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 $9,000.00 Recurring Fees $0.00 $131,428.00 $0.00 $0.00 2017-40609-2 - Tyler Hosting Services CONFIDENTIAL 2 of 5 Summary Summary Total Contract Total One Time Fees $9,000.00 $403,284.00 Recurring Fees $131,428.00 Unless otherwise indicated in the contract or amendment thereto, pricing for optional items will be held for six (6) months from the Quote date or the Effective Date of the contract, whichever is later. Customer Approval: Print Name: All primary values quoted in US Dollars Date: 2017-40609-2 - Tyler Hosting Services CONFIDENTIAL 3 of 5 Comments Tyler recommends the use of a 128 -bit SSL Security Certificate for any Internet Web Applications, such as the Munis Web Client and the MUNIS Self Service applications if hosted by the Client. This certificate is required to encrypt the highly sensitive payroll and financial information as it travels across the public internet. There are various vendors who sell SSL Certificates, with all ranges of prices. The Tyler Software Product Tyler ReadyForms Processing must be used in conjunction with a Hewlett Packard printer supported by Tyler for printing checks. Tyler's quote contains estimates of the amount of services needed, based on our preliminary understanding of the size and scope of your project. The actual amount of services depends on such factors as your level of involvement in the project and the speed of knowledge transfer. Unless otherwise noted, prices submitted in the quote do not include travel expenses incurred in accordance with Tyler's then -current Business Travel Policy. Tyler's prices do not include applicable local, city or federal sales, use excise, personal property or other similar taxes or duties, which you are responsible for determining and remitting. Installations are completed remotely, but can be done onsite upon request at an additional cost. In the event Client cancels services less than two (2) weeks in advance, Client is liable to Tyler for (i) all non-refundable expenses incurred by Tyler on Client's behalf; and (ii) daily fees associated with the cancelled services if Tyler is unable to re -assign its personnel. Implementation hours are scheduled and delivered in four (4) or eight (8) hour increments. Tyler provides onsite training for a maximum of 12 people per class. In the event that more than 12 users wish to participate in a training class or more than one occurrence of a class is needed, Tyler will either provide additional days at then -current rates for training or Tyler will utilize a Train -the -Trainer approach whereby the client designated attendees of the initial training can thereafter train the remaining users. In the event Client acquires from Tyler any edition of Tyler Content Manager software other than Enterprise Edition, the license for Content Manager is restricted to use with Tyler applications only. If Client wishes to use Tyler Content Manager software with non -Tyler applications, Client must purchase or upgrade to Tyler Content Manager Enterprise Edition. Tyler's form library prices are based on the actual form quantities listed, and assume the forms will be provided according to the standard Munis form template. Any forms in addition to the quoted amounts and types, including custom forms or forms that otherwise require custom programming, are subject to an additional fee. Please also note that use of the Tyler Forms functionality requires the use of approved printers as well. You may contact Tyler's support team for the most current list of approved printers. Payroll library includes: 1 PR check, 1 direct deposit, 1 vendor from payroll check, 1 vendor from payroll direct deposit, W2, W2c, ACA 1095B, ACA 1095C and 1099 R. General Billing library includes: 1 invoice, 1 statement, 1 general billing receipt and 1 miscellaneous receipt. Permits library includes: 1 Building permit, 1 Trades permit, 1 Zoning permit and 1 certificate of occupancy/completion. Business license library includes: 1 business license and 1 renewal application. Tyler's pricing is based on the scope of proposed products and services being obtained from Tyler. Should portions of the scope of products or services be removed by the Client, Tyler reserves the right to adjust prices for the remaining scope accordingly. 2017-40609-2 - Tyler Hosting Services CONFIDENTIAL 4 of 5 Comments Project Management includes project planning, kickoff meeting, status calls, task monitoring, verification and transition to support. Tyler Content Manager SE includes up to ITB of storage. Should additional storage be needed it may be purchased as needed at an annual fee of $5,000 per TB. The Munis SaaS fees are based on 25 concurrent users. Should the number of concurrent users be exceeded, Tyler reserves the right to re -negotiate the SaaS fees based upon any resulting changes in the pricing categories. Accounting/GL includes Accounts Payable and Budgeting. Development modifications, interfaces and services, where applicable, shall be invoiced to the client in the following manner: 50% of total upon authorized signature to proceed on program specifications and the remaining 50% of total upon delivery of modifications, interface and services. 2017-40609-2 - Tyler Hosting Services CONFIDENTIAL 5 of 5 Exhibit B • tyler • technologies Exhibit B Invoicing and Payment Policy We will provide you with the software and services set forth in the Investment Summary of the Agreement. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined will have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Agreement. Invoicing: We will invoice you for the applicable software and services in the Investment Summary as set forth below. Your rights to dispute any invoice are set forth in the Agreement. 1. SaaS Fees. SaaS Fees are invoiced on an annual basis, beginning on the commencement of the initial term as set forth in Section F (1) of this Agreement. Your annual SaaS fees for the initial term are set forth in the Investment Summary. Upon expiration of the initial term, your annual SaaS fees will be at our then -current rates. 2. Other Tyler Software and Services. 2.1 VPN Device: The fee for the VPN device will be invoiced upon installation of the VPN. 2.2 Implementation and Other Professional Services (including training): Implementation and other professional services (including training) are billed and invoiced as delivered, at the rates set forth in the Investment Summary. 2.3 Consulting Services: If you have purchased any Business Process Consulting services, if they have been quoted as fixed -fee services, they will be invoiced 50% upon your acceptance of the Best Practice Recommendations, by module, and 50% upon your acceptance of custom desktop procedures, by module. If you have purchased any Business Process Consulting services and they are quoted as an estimate, then we will bill you the actual services delivered on a time and materials basis. 2.4 Conversions: Fixed -fee conversions are invoiced 50% upon initial delivery of the converted Data, by conversion option, and 50% upon Client acceptance to load the converted Data into Live/Production environment, by conversion option. Where conversions are quoted as estimated, we will bill you the actual services delivered on a time and materials basis. 2.5 Requested Modifications to the Tyler Software: Requested modifications to the Tyler Software are invoiced 50% upon delivery of specifications and 50% upon delivery of the applicable modification. You must report any failure of the modification to conform to the specifications within thirty (30) days of delivery; otherwise, the modification will be deemed to be in compliance with the specifications after the 30 -day window has passed. You may still report Defects to us as set forth in this Agreement. 2.6 Other Fixed Price Services: Other fixed price services are invoiced as delivered, at the rates set forth in the Investment Summary. For the avoidance of doubt, where "Project Planning Services" are provided, payment will be due upon delivery of the Implementation Planning document. Dedicated Project Management services, if any, will be billed monthly in arrears, beginning on the first day of the month immediately following initiation of project planning. 3. Third Party Products. 3.1 Third Party Software License Fees: License fees for Third Party Software, if any, are invoiced when we make it available to you for downloading. 9.06•• tyler .,... • technologies 1 Exhibit B 3.2 Third Party Software Maintenance: The first year maintenance for the Third Party Software is invoiced when we make it available to you for downloading. 3.3 Third Party Hardware: Third Party Hardware costs, if any, are invoiced upon delivery. 3.4 Third Party Services: Fees for Third Party Services, if any, are invoiced as delivered, along with applicable expenses, at the rates set forth in the Investment Summary. 4. Expenses. The service rates in the Investment Summary do not include travel expenses. Expenses for Tyler delivered services will be billed as incurred and only in accordance with our then -current Business Travel Policy, plus a 10% travel agency processing fee. Our current Business Travel Policy is attached to this Exhibit B at Schedule 1. Copies of receipts will be provided upon request; we reserve the right to charge you an administrative fee depending on the extent of your requests. Receipts for miscellaneous items less than twenty-five dollars and mileage logs are not available. 5. Credit for Prepaid Maintenance and Support Fees for Tyler Software. Client will receive a credit for the maintenance and support fees prepaid for the Tyler Software for the time period commencing on the first day of the SaaS Term. Payment. Payment for undisputed invoices is due within forty-five (45) days of the invoice date. We prefer to receive payments electronically. Our electronic payment information is available by contacting AR@tvlertech.com. •••'•• tyler •••.t • technologies • tyler • technologies Exhibit B Schedule 1 Business Travel Policy 1 Air Travel A Reservations & Tickets Exhibit B Schedule 1 The Travel Management Company (TMC) used by Tyler will provide an employee with a direct flight within two hours before or after the requested departure time, assuming that flight does not add more than three hours to the employee's total trip duration and the fare is within $100 (each way) of the lowest logical fare. If a net savings of $200 or more (each way) is possible through a connecting flight that is within two hours before or after the requested departure time and that does not add more than three hours to the employee's total trip duration, the connecting flight should be accepted. Employees are encouraged to make advanced reservations to take full advantage of discount opportunities. Employees should use all reasonable efforts to make travel arrangements at least two (2) weeks in advance of commitments. A seven (7) day advance booking requirement is mandatory. When booking less than seven (7) days in advance, management approval will be required. Except in the case of international travel where a segment of continuous air travel is six (6) or more consecutive hours in length, only economy or coach class seating is reimbursable. Employees shall not be reimbursed for "Basic Economy Fares' because these fares are non-refundable and have many restrictions that outweigh the cost -savings. B Baggage Fees Reimbursement of personal baggage charges are based on trip duration as follows: • Up to five (5) days = one (1) checked bag Six (6) or more days = two (2) checked bags Baggage fees for sports equipment are not reimbursable. 2 Ground Transportation A. Private Automobile Mileage Allowance — Business use of an employee's private automobile will be reimbursed at the current IRS allowable rate, plus out of pocket costs for tolls and parking. Mileage will be calculated by using the employee's office as the starting and ending point, in compliance with IRS regulations. Employees who have been designated a home office should calculate miles from their home. B Rental Car 1 • •••'•• tyler • technologies Exhibit B Schedule 1 Employees are authorized to rent cars only in conjunction with air travel when cost, convenience, and the specific situation reasonably require their use. When renting a car for Tyler business, employees should select a "mid-size" or "intermediate" car. "Full" size cars may be rented when three or more employees are traveling together. Tyler carries leased vehicle coverage for business car rentals; except for employees traveling to Alaska and internationally (excluding Canada), additional insurance on the rental agreement should be declined. C Public Transportation Taxi or airport limousine services may be considered when traveling in and around cities or to and from airports when less expensive means of transportation are unavailable or impractical. The actual fare plus a reasonable tip (15-18%) are reimbursable. In the case of a free hotel shuttle to the airport, tips are included in the per diem rates and will not be reimbursed separately. D Parking & Tolls When parking at the airport, employees must use longer term parking areas that are measured in days as opposed to hours. Park and fly options located near some airports may also be used. For extended trips that would result in excessive parking charges, public transportation to/from the airport should be considered. Tolls will be reimbursed when receipts are presented. 3 Lodging Tyler's TMC will select hotel chains that are well established, reasonable in price, and conveniently located in relation to the traveler's work assignment. Typical hotel chains include Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, Hampton Inn, and Holiday Inn Express. If the employee has a discount rate with a local hotel, the hotel reservation should note that discount and the employee should confirm the lower rate with the hotel upon arrival. Employee memberships in travel clubs such as AAA should be noted in their travel profiles so that the employee can take advantage of any lower club rates. "No shows" or cancellation fees are not reimbursable if the employee does not comply with the hotel's cancellation policy. Tips for maids and other hotel staff are included in the per diem rate and are not reimbursed separately. Employees are not authorized to reserve non-traditional short-term lodging, such as Airbnb, VRBO, and HomeAway. Employees who elect to make such reservations shall not be reimbursed. 4 Meals and Incidental Expenses Employee meals and incidental expenses while on travel status within the continental U.S. are in accordance with the federal per diem rates published by the General Services Administration. Incidental expenses include tips to maids, hotel staff, and shuttle drivers and other minor travel expenses. Per diem rates are available at www.gsa.gov/perdiem. Per diem for Alaska, Hawaii, U.S. protectorates and international destinations are provided separately by the Department of State and will be determined as required. A Overnight Travel For each full day of travel, all three meals are reimbursable. Per diems on the first and last day of a trip are governed asset forth below. Departure Dav K • 0000•• tyler 000,0 • technologies Depart before 12:00 noon Lunch and dinner Depart after 12:00 noon Dinner Return Dav Return before 12:00 noon Breakfast Return between 12:00 noon & 7:00 p.m. Breakfast and lunch Return after 7:00 p.m.* Breakfast, lunch and dinner *7:00 p.m. is defined as direct travel time and does not include time taken to stop for dinner. The reimbursement rates for individual meals are calculated as a percentage of the full day per diem as follows: Breakfast 15% Lunch 25 Dinner 60% B. Same Day Travel Exhibit B Schedule 1 Employees traveling at least 100 miles to a site and returning in the same day are eligible to claim lunch on an expense report. Employees on same day travel status are eligible to claim dinner in the event they return home after 7:00 p.m.* *7:00 p.m. is defined as direct travel time and does not include time taken to stop for dinner. 5 Internet Access — Hotels and Airports Employees who travel may need to access their e-mail at night. Many hotels provide free high speed internet access and Tyler employees are encouraged to use such hotels whenever possible. If an employee's hotel charges for internet access it is reimbursable up to $10.00 per day. Charges for internet access at airports are not reimbursable. 6. International Travel All international flights with the exception of flights between the U.S. and Canada should be reserved through TMC using the "lowest practical coach fare' with the exception of flights that are six (6) or more consecutive hours in length. In such event, the next available seating class above coach shall be reimbursed. When required to travel internationally for business, employees shall be reimbursed for photo fees, application fees, and execution fees when obtaining a new passport book, but fees related to passport renewals are not reimbursable. Visa application and legal fees, entry taxes and departure taxes are reimbursable. The cost of vaccinations that are either required for travel to specific countries or suggested by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services for travel to specific countries, is reimbursable. Section 4, Meals & Incidental Expenses, and Section 2.b., Rental Car, shall apply to this section. •••'• •• tyler •••.• • technologies 3 • ... rtyler • technologies Exhibit C Service Level Agreement I. Agreement Overview Exhibit C This SIA operates in conjunction with, and does not supersede or replace any part of, the Agreement. It outlines the information technology service levels that we will provide to you to ensure the availability of the application services that you have requested us to provide. All other support services are documented in the Support Call Process. II. Definitions. Except as defined below, all defined terms have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. Attainment: The percentage of time the Tyler Software is available during a calendar quarter, with percentages rounded to the nearest whole number. Client Error Incident: Any service unavailability resulting from your applications, content or equipment, or the acts or omissions of any of your service users or third - party providers over whom we exercise no control. Downtime: Those minutes during which the Tyler Software is not available for your use. Downtime does not include those instances in which only a Defect is present. Service Availability: The total number of minutes in a calendar quarter that the Tyler Software is capable of receiving, processing, and responding to requests, excluding maintenance windows, Client Error Incidents and Force Majeure. III. Service Availability The Service Availability of the Tyler Software is intended to be 24/7/365. We set Service Availability goals and measures whether we have met those goals by tracking Attainment. a. Your Responsibilities Whenever you experience Downtime, you must make a support call according to the procedures outlined in the Support Call Process. You will receive a support incident number. You must document, in writing, all Downtime that you have experienced during a calendar quarter. You must deliver such documentation to us within 30 days of a quarter's end. The documentation you provide must evidence the Downtime clearly and convincingly. It must include, for example, the support incident number(s) and the date, time and duration of the Downtime(s). b. Our Responsibilities When our support team receives a call from you that Downtime has occurred or is occurring, we will work with you to identify the cause of the Downtime (including whether it may be the result of a Client Error Incident or Force Majeure). We will also work with you to resume normal operations. Upon timely receipt of your Downtime report, we will compare that report to our own outage logs and support tickets to confirm that Downtime for which we were responsible indeed occurred. We will respond to your Downtime report within 30 day(s) of receipt. To the extent we have confirmed Downtime for which we are responsible, we will provide you with the relief set forth below. C. Client Relief 1 • •••'•• tyler •••.• • technologies Exhibit C When a Service Availability goal is not met due to confirmed Downtime, we will provide you with relief that corresponds to the percentage amount by which that goal was not achieved, as set forth in the Client Relief Schedule below. Notwithstanding the above, the total amount of all relief that would be due under this SLA per quarter will not exceed 5% of one quarter of the then -current SaaS Fee. The total credits confirmed by us in one or more quarters of a billing cycle will be applied to the SaaS Fee for the next billing cycle. Issuing of such credit does not relieve us of our obligations under the Agreement to correct the problem which created the service interruption. Every quarter, we will compare confirmed Downtime to Service Availability. In the event actual Attainment does not meet the targeted Attainment, the following Client relief will apply, on a quarterly basis: n Actual Attainmen Client Relief 100% 98-99% Remedial action will be taken. 4% credit of fee for affected calendar quarter will be posted to next 100% 95-97% billing cycle 5% credit of fee for affected calendar quarter will be posted to next 100% <95% billing cycle You may request a report from us that documents the preceding quarter's Service Availability, Downtime, any remedial actions that have been/will be taken, and any credits that may be issued. IV. Applicability The commitments set forth in this SLA do not apply during maintenance windows, Client Error Incidents, and Force Majeure. We perform maintenance during limited windows that are historically known to be reliably low -traffic times. If and when maintenance is predicted to occur during periods of higher traffic, we will provide advance notice of those windows and will coordinate to the greatest extent possible with you. V. Force Majeure You will not hold us responsible for not meeting service levels outlined in this SLA to the extent any failure to do so is caused by Force Majeure. In the event of Force Majeure, we will file with you a signed request that said failure be excused. That writing will at least include the essential details and circumstances supporting our request for relief pursuant to this Section. You will not unreasonably withhold its acceptance of such a request. •••••• tyler .,.. • technologies K • •• - tyler •jtechnologies Exhibit C Schedule 1 Support Call Process Support Channels Exhibit C Schedule 1 Tyler Technologies, Inc. provides the following channels of software support: (1) Tyler Community — an on-line resource, Tyler Community provides a venue for all Tyler clients with current maintenance agreements to collaborate with one another, share best practices and resources, and access documentation. (2) On-line submission (portal) —for less urgent and functionality -based questions, users may create unlimited support incidents through the customer relationship management portal available at the Tyler Technologies website. (3) Email —for less urgent situations, users may submit unlimited emails directly to the software support group. (4) Telephone — for urgent or complex questions, users receive toll-free, unlimited telephone software support. Support Resources A number of additional resources are available to provide a comprehensive and complete support experience: (1) Tyler Website — www.tylertech.com —for accessing client tools and other information including support contact information. (2) Tyler Community — available through login, Tyler Community provides a venue for clients to support one another and share best practices and resources. (3) Knowledgebase —A fully searchable depository of thousands of documents related to procedures, best practices, release information, and job aides. (4) Program Updates—where development activity is made available for client consumption Support Availability Tyler Technologies support is available during the local business hours of 8 AM to 5 PM (Monday— Friday) across four US time zones (Pacific, Mountain, Central and Eastern). Clients may receive coverage across these time zones. Tyler's holiday schedule is outlined below. There will be no support coverage on these days. New Year's Day Thanksgiving Day Memorial Day Day after Thanksgiving Independence Day Christmas Day Labor Day Issue Handling Incident Tracking Every support incident is logged into Tyler's Customer Relationship Management System and given a unique incident number. This system tracks the history of each incident. The incident tracking number is used to track and reference open issues when clients contact support. Clients may track incidents, using the incident number, through the portal at Tyler's website or by calling software support directly. •••'•• tyler •••.• • technologies 1 Exhibit C Schedule 1 Incident Priority Each incident is assigned a priority number, which corresponds to the client's needs and deadlines. The client is responsible for reasonably setting the priority of the incident per the chart below. This chart is not intended to address every type of support incident, and certain "characteristics" may or may not apply depending on whether the Tyler software has been deployed on customer infrastructure or the Tyler cloud. The goal is to help guide the client towards clearly understanding and communicating the importance of the issue and to describe generally expected responses and resolutions. Priority Characteristics of Support Incident Resolution Targets Level Support incident that causes (a) complete application Tyler shall provide an initial response to Priority Level 1 incidents within one (1) business hour of failure or application unavailability; (b) application receipt of the support incident. Tyler shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve such 1 failure or unavailability in one or more of the client's support incidents or provide a circumvention procedure within one (1) business day. For non -hosted Critical remote location; or (c) systemic loss of multiple essential customers, Tyler's responsibility for lost or corrupted Data is limited to assisting the client in restoring system functions. its last available database. Support incident that causes (a) repeated, consistent Tyler shall provide an initial response to Priority Level 2 incidents within four (4) business hours of failure of essential functionality affecting more than one receipt of the support incident. Tyler shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve such 2 user or (b) loss or corruption of Data. support incidents or provide a circumvention procedure within ten (10) business days. For non - High hosted customers, Tyler's responsibility for loss or corrupted Data is limited to assisting the client in restoring its last available database. Priority Level 1 incident with an existing circumvention Tyler shall provide an initial response to Priority Level 3 incidents within one (1) business day of procedure, or a Priority Level 2 incident that affects only receipt of the support incident. Tyler shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve such 3 one user or for which there is an existing circumvention support incidents without the need for a circumvention procedure with the next published Medium procedure. maintenance update or service pack. For non -hosted customers, Tyler's responsibility for lost or corrupted Data is limited to assisting the client in restoring its last available database. 4 Support incident that causes failure of non-essential Tyler shall provide an initial response to Priority Level 4 incidents within two (2) business days. Tyler Non- functionality or a cosmetic or other issue that does not shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve such support incidents, as well as cosmetic critical qualify as any other Priority Level. issues, with a future version release. Incident Escalation Tyler Technology's software support consists of four levels of personnel: (1) Level 1: front-line representatives (2) Level 2: more senior in their support role, they assist front-line representatives and take on escalated issues (3) Level 3: assist in incident escalations and specialized client issues (4) Level 4: responsible for the management of support teams for either a single product or a product group If a client feels they are not receiving the service needed, they may contact the appropriate Software Support Manager. After receiving the incident tracking number, the manager will follow up on the open issue and determine the necessary action to meet the client's needs. On occasion, the priority or immediacy of a software support incident may change after initiation. Tyler encourages clients to communicate the level of urgency or priority of software support issues so that we can respond appropriately. A software support incident can be escalated by any of the following methods: (1) Telephone —for immediate response, call toll-free to either escalate an incident's priority or to escalate an issue through management channels as described above. (2) Email — clients can send an email to software support in order to escalate the priority of an issue (3) On-line Support Incident Portal — clients can also escalate the priority of an issue by logging into the client incident portal and referencing the appropriate incident tracking number. • •••'•• tyler •••.• • technologies K Exhibit C Schedule 1 Remote Support Tool Some support calls require further analysis of the clients database, processor setup to diagnose a problem or to assist with a question. Tyler will, at its discretion, use an industry -standard remote support tool. Support is able to quickly connect to the client's desktop and view the site's setup, diagnose problems, or assist with screen navigation. More information about the remote support tool Tyler uses is available upon request. •••'•• tyler •••.• • technologies . •••'•• tyler . technologies Exhibit D End User License Agreement REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Exhibit D •.= tyler Exhibit D ATTENTION: THE SOFTWARE PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS BEING LICENSED TO YOU BY ECLIPSE CORPORATION 51WTSL, INC_ ]Eclipse Corporation) AND IS NOT BEING SOLD. THIS SOFTWARE I5 PROVIDED UNDER THE FOLLOWING AGREEMENT THAT SPECIFIES WHAT YOU MANY DO SMITH THE SOFTWARE AND CONTAINS IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, CONDITIONS, REMEDIES, AND LIABILITIES. Do cOrig i n SOFTWARE LICENSE IMPORTANT -READ CAREFULLY. This End -User License Agreement ('Agreement' or 'EULA') is a legal agreement between you (either an individual person or a single legal entity, who will be referred to in this EULA as 'You") and Eclipse Corporation W SL, Inc_ referred to in this EULA as Eclipse Corporation, for the DocOrigin software product that accompanies this EULA, including any associated media, printed materials and electronic documentation (the "Software"). The Software also encompasses any software updates, add -an components, web services andlor supplements that may be provided to you or made available to you after the date you obtain the initial copy of the Software to the extent that such items ane not accompanied by a separate license agreement or terms of use. If you receive the Software under separate terms from your distributor, those terms will take precedence over any conflicting terms of Phis EULA_ By installing, copying, down loading, accessing or otherwise using the Software, you agree to be bound by the to rms of this EULA. If you do not agree to the terms of this EULA, do not install, access or use the Software; instead, you should remove the Software from all systems and receive a full refund. IF YOU ARE AN AGENT OR EMPLOYEE OF ANOTHER ENTITY YOU REPRESENT AND WARRANT THAT (I) THE INDIVIDUAL ACCEPTING THIS AGREEMENT IS DULY AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT THIS AGREEMENT ON SUCH ENTITY'S BEHALF AND TO BIND SUCH ENTITY, AND {II'} SUCH EWr Y HAS FULL POWER., CORPORATE OR OTHERWISE, TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT AND PERFORM ITS OBLIGATIONS HEREUNDER. 1_ LICENSE TERMS 11.1 In dais Agreement a "License Key' means any license key, activation code, or similar installation, access or usage control codes, including serial numbers digitally created and or provided by EcAipse Corporation ,designed to provide unlocked access to the Software and its functionality. 1.2 Evaluation License_ Subject to all of the teres and conditions of this Agreement, Eclipse Corporation grants You a limited, royalty -free, non-exclusive, non -transferable license to download and install a copy of the Software from wwyw.doc*dgin.com on a single machine and use it on a royalty -free basis for no more than 120 days from the date of installation (the 'Evaluation Period'). You may use the Software during the Evaluation Period solely for the purpose of testing ,and evaluating it to determine if You wish to obtain a commercial, production license for the Software. This evaluation license grant will automatically end on expiry of the Evaluation Period and you acknowledge and ,agree that Eclipse Corporation will be under no obligation to renew or extend the Evaluation Period. If you wish to continue using the Software You may, on payment of the applicable fees, upgrade to a full license (as furtherdescribed in section 1.3 below} on the Terms of this Agreement and will be issued with a License Key for the same. If you do not wish to continue °o license dee Software after expiry of the Evaluation Period, then You agree to comply with the termination obligations set out in section [7.8] ofthis Agreement. For greater certainty, any document generated by you under an evaluation license will have a 'spoiler or watermark on the output document_ Documents generated by DocOrigin software that has a valid license key file also installed will not have the 'spoiler produced. "ou ,are not pennitted �o remove the watermark or'spoiler from documents generated using the software under an evaluation license. 1.3 Development and Testing Licenses. Development and testing licenses are available for purchase through authorized distributors and resellers of Eclipse Corpoaation only. Subject to all of the terms .and conditions of this Agreement, Eclipse Corporation grants You, a perpetual (subject to termination by Eclipse Corporation due to your breach of the terms of this Aagreement}, non-exclusive, non -transferable, worldwide ••:;. tyler Exhibit D non -sub license able liven=_= -o download and install a copy of the. Software from weerw.docorigin.00rnr on a single machine and use f , cevelopment ,and testing to create collateral deployable to 'four production system{s)_ You are not erb-. ':� ase a development and testing license for live production purposes. 1.4 Production Licenses. !=- _ction licenses are available for purchase through authorized distributors and resellers of Eclipse Corpora -,on only. Subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Eclipse Corporation grants You, a perpetual {subject to termination by Eclipse Corporation due to your breach of the terms of this Agreement), non-exclusive, non -transferable, worldwide non -sub license able license to use the Software i n accord ante with the I icen se type purchased by you as set out on yo ur purchase orde r as fu rthe r described below. For greater certainty, unless otherwise agreed in a purchase order concluded with an approved distributor of the Software, .and approved by Eclipse Corporation, the default license to the Software is a per -CPU license as described in A_ below_ A. Per -CPU_ The total number of CPUs on a computer used to operate the Software may not exceed the licensed quantity of CPUs. For purposes of this license metric: (a) CPUs may contain more than one processing core, each group of two (2) processing cores is consider one (1) CPU., and any remaining unpaired processing core, will be deemed a CPU_ (b) all CPUs an a cornputer an which the Software is installed shall be deemed to operate the Software unless You configure that computer (using a reliable and verifiable means of hardware or software partitioning) such that the total number of CIFUs that actually operate the Software is less than the total number on that computer_ Virtual Machines t` VM"s`} .are considered as a server. Installing and configuring the software on multiple VIVI's requires one license per VM server. An enterprise license is available upon request. 'Pricing varies based on the size c'the company. 13. Per -Document- This is defined as a fee per document based on the total number of documents genera -ed annually by merging data with a template created by the Software. The combined data. and template produce documents of one or more pages. A document may contain 1 or more pages_ For instance, a batch of invoices for 25D customers may contain 1,1300 pages, this will be counted as 250 documents which should correspond to 25D invoices_ C. Per -Surface_ This is defined as a fee per surface based on the total number of surfaces generated annually by merging data with a template created by the Software. The combined data and 'template produce documents of one or more pages, the pages may be prin-.ed one side (one surface). or duplexed (2 surfaces}. The documents may be rendered to a computer file f[i.e. PDF), each page placed in the file is considered a surface. A document may contain 1 or more surfaces. For instance, .a batch of invoices for 25C customers may contain 500 pages duplexed, this will be counted as 1001) surfaces. 1.5 Disaster Recovery License_ You may request .a Disaster Recovery license of the Software for each production license You have purchased as a fai lover in the event of loss of use of the production server(s). This license is for disaster recovery purposes only and under no circumstance may the disaster recovery license be used for production simultaneously with a production license with which it is paired_ 1.i6 Backup Copies_ After installation of the Software pursuant to this EULA, you may store a copy of the installation files for the Software solely for backup or archival purposes,. Except as expressly provided in this EULA, you may not otherwise make copies of the S&tware or the printed materials accompanying the Software. 1.7 Third -Party Software License Rights. If a separate license agreement pertaining to an item of hird-party software is: delivered to You with the Software, Included in the Software download package, or referenced in any material that is provided with the Software, then such separate license agreement shall govern Your use of that item or version of Third -Party Software. Your rights in respect to any third -party software, third -party data, third -party software or other third -party content provided with the Software shall be limited to those rights necessary to operate the Software as permitted by this Agreement. No other rights in the Software or third -party software are granted to You. 00 •• tyler Exhibit D 2_ LICENSE RESTRICTIONS Any copies of -he Software shall include all trademarks, copyright notices, restricted rights legends, proprietary markings and €he like exactly as they .appear on the copy of the Software originally provided to You. You may not remove or alter any copyright, trademark and or proprietary notices marked on any part of the Software or related documentation and must reproduce all such notices on all authorized copies, of the ,Software and related documentation. You shall not sublicense, distribute or otherwise make the Software available to any third party (including, without limitation, any contractor, franchisee, agent or dealer} without first obtaining the written agreement of (a) Eclipse Corporation to that use, and (b) such third party to comply with this Agreement_ You further agree not to (i} rent, lease, sell, sublicense, assign, or otherwise transfer the Software to anyone else; (i i) directly or indirectly use the Software or any information about the Software in the development of any software that is competitive with the Software, or (iii) use the Software to operate or as a part of a time-sharing service, ow.sourcing service, service bureau, application service provider or managed service provider offering. You further agree not to reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software. 3. UPDATES, MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT 3.1 During the validity period of Your License Key, You will be entitled to download the latest version of the ,Software from the DocOrigin website www_docodgin.com. Use of any updates provided to You shall be governed by the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Eclipse Corporation reserves the right at any time to not release or to discontinue release of any Software and to alter prices features, specifications., capabilities, functions, licensing terms, release dates, general availability or ocher characteristics of the Software. 3.2 On expiry of your maintenance ,and support contrao-.. you will have the right to continue using the current version(s) of the Software which you downloaded pr c .he date of expiry of your License Key. However, you will need to renew main"enance and support in order t receive a new License Key that will unlock the more current version(s) of the Software. For greater certainty, if you ,attempt to use an expired License Rey to download the latest version of the Software, the Software will revert to being a looked, evaluation copy of that version of the Software. 4_ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS_ This EULA does not gran,: you any rights in connection wi h any trademarks or service marks of Eclipse Corporation or DocOrigin. All title and intellectual property rights in and to the Software, the accompanying printed materials, and any copies of the Software are owned by Eclipse Corporation or its suppliers. All title and intellectual property rights in .and to the content that is not contained in the Software, but may be accessed through use of the Software, is .he property of -:he respective content owners and may be protected by applicable c3opyright or other intellectual propery laws and treaties. This EULA grants you no rights to use such content. If this Software contains documentation that is provided only in electronic form, you may print one copy of such electronic documentation. &. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES. 70 THE GREATEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE LICENSED SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT PROVIDED BY ECLIPSE CORPORATION HEREUNDER ARE PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS' BASIS AND T-IERE ARE 140 WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR CONDITIONS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, Vi'RITT=14 CR ORAL, ARISING BY STATUTE, OPERATI 14 OF LAW, COURSE OF DEALVNG, USAGE OF TRA_'E OP OTHERWISE, REGARDING, THEM OR ANY OTHER PRODUCT OR SERVICE PROVIDED UNDER THS AGREEMENT OR IN CONNECTION WIFTH THIS AGREEMENT BY ECLIPSE CORPORATION ECLIPSE COR='ORATION DISCLAIM ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF GUALITY,. MERCHANTABILITY. MERCHANTABLE QUALITY, DURABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PAR71CU'LAsR PURPOSE ARID NON -INFRINGEMENT. ECLIPSE CORPORATION DOES NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT THAT THE 30FTWARE SHALL MEET ANY OR ALL OF YOUR PARTICULAR REQUIREMENTS, THAT THE SOFTWARE WILL OPERATE ERROR -FREE OR UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT ALL ERRORS OR DEFECTS IN THE S€]FTWA,RE CAN BE FOUND OR CORRECTED. In certain jurisdictions, some or all of the provisions in this Section may not be effective or the applicable law may mandate a more extensive warranty in which case the applicable law will prevail overthis Agreement. ••0 yler V* 4 Exhibit D 11. INDEMNIFICATION & LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY_ 11.1 Eclipse Corporation shall defend andfor settle a its expense, any claims., actions, allegations or proceedings against You to the extant arising out of or relating to rrisappropriation or infringement by the Software of any third party's proprietary or intellectual property right ('Clainns'), and Eclipse Corporation shall pay all damages finally awarded by a court of competent jurisdiction to such third party against You, or any settlement amounts agreed by Eclipse Corporation; subject to the conditions that, You shall notify Eclipse Corporation promptly of any You -Claims, permit Eclipse Corporation to control the defense and settlement of such Claims and assist Eclipse Corporation, at Eclipse Corporation's expense, in defending or settling such Claims. Eclipse Corporation shall no be liable for any settlement amounts entered into by You without Eclipse Corporation's prior written approval. If Eclipse Corporation has reason to believe that it would be subject to an injunction or continuing damages based on the Software, then Eclipse Corporation may (and if Eclipse Corporation or any of its customers or third party software suppliers is subject to an injunction or continuing damages based on the Software), then notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, Eclipse Corporation shall be entitled to either modify the Software to make it non -infringing an6br remove the misappropria-ed material, replace the Software or portion thereof with a service or materials that provide substantially the same functionality or information, or, if neither of the foregoing is commercially practicable, require You to cease using the Software and refund to You (a) a pro rata portion of any one (1) time fees (based on a three (3) year, straight-line depreciation schedule from the date o§ payment}, and (b) any fees that have been pre -paid by You but are unused- The foregoing notwithstanding, Eclipse Corporation shall have no liability fora claim of infri ngement or misappropriation to the extent ca used by (i) the combination of the Software with any other service, software, data or products not provided or approved by Eclipse Corporation; or (ii) the use of any material provided by You or any end users, (iii) any breach by You o€!his. AgreemenL THE FOREGOING IS ECLIPSE CORF'OR.ATI4]N'S SOLE AND EXCLUSI VE LIABILITY, AND YOUR SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ANY INFRINGEMENT OR 1611SAFIPROPRIATION OF ANY TF-IRD-PARTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS_ TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL ECLIPSE CORPORATION BE LIABLE TD YOU OR ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT. INCIDENTAL. SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, INCLJDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, LEGAL EXPENSES, LOSS OF BUSINESS, LOSS OF PROFITS,: LOSS OF REVENUE, LOST OR DAMAGED DATA, LOSS OF COMPUTER TIME, COST OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES, DR FAILURE TO REALIZE EXPECTED SAVINGS OR ANY OTHER COMMERCIAL OR ECONOMIC LOSSES ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION W17H THIS AGREEMENT, EVEN IF ECLIPSE CORPORATION HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGES, OR SUCH LOSSES OR DAMAGES ARE FORESEEABLE. 11.2 THE ENTIRE LIABILITY OF ECLIPSE CORPORATION AND YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY WITH RESPECT TO THE 3OFTanPARE AND TECHNICAL 3UPPORT AND ANY OTHER PRODUCTS OR .SERVICES SUPPLIED BY ECLIPSE CORPORATION IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT FOR DAMAGES FOR ANY CAUSE AND REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION, WHETHER IN CONTRACT OR IN TORT, INCLUDING FUNDAMENTAL BREACH OR NEGLIGENCE, WILL BE LIMITED IN THE AGGREGATE TO THE ,AMOUNTS PAID BY YOU FOR THE SOFTWARE, TECHNICAL SUPPORT OR SERVICES GIVING RISE TO THE CLAIM. 11.3 THE DISCLAIMER OF REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CONSTITUTE ,AM ESSENTIAL PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT BUT FOR THE DISCLAIMER OF REPRESENTATIONS, WARP ANTIES AND CONDITIONS AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, NE17HER ECLIPSE CORPORATION NOR ANY OF ITS LICENSORS OR SUPPLIERS WOULD GRANT THE RIGHTS GRANTED IN THIS AGREEMENT. F�I:11.I'EalFaII[Q., 7.1 The term of this Agreement will begin on download of the Software and, in respect of an Evaluation License, shall continue for the Evaluation Period, and in respect of all other license types defined in Section 1, shall continue for as long as You use the ;Software, uHess earlier termina-ed sooner under this section 7. 7.2 Eclipse Corporation may terminate this Agreement in the event of any breach by You if such breach has not been cured within Thirty (30days of notice to You. No termination of this Agreement will entitle You to a refund of any amounts paid by You to Eclipse Corporation or its applicable distributor or reseller or affect any obligations You may have to pay any outstanding amounts owing to Eclipse Corporation or its distributor_ ••.;:•. tyles_. Exhibit D 7.3 Your rights to use the Software will immediately terminate upon termination or expiration ,c: this Agreement Within thirty [31)] days o'` termination or expiration of this Agreement, You shall purge all Software and all copies thereof from all computer systems and storage devices on which it was stored, and certify such to Eclipse Corporation fl. 'GENERAL PROVISIONS 0.1 No Waiver_ Ido delay or failure in exercising any right under this Agreement, or any partial or single exercise of any right, will constitute a waiver of that right a any other rights under this Agreement. No consent to a breach of any express or implied terra set out in this. Agreement constitutes consent to any subsequent breach, whether of the same or any orhe•r provision_ 13.2 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is, or becomes. ,unenforceable, it will be severed from this Agreement and the remainder of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect 8.3 Assignment. You may not transfer or assign this Agreement (:whether voluntarily, by operation of law, or otherwise) without Eclipse Corporation 's prior written consent Eclipse Corporation may assign this Agreement at any time without notice. This Agreement is binding upon and will inure to the bene5t of both parties, and their respective successors and permitted assigns. BA Covrenning Law and Venue if You are located in the USA_ This. Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas if You are located in the USA- No choice of laws rules of any jurisdction shall apply to `his Agreement You consent and agree that the courts, of the State of Texas shall have jurisdiction over any legal action or proceeding brought by You arising out of or relating to this Agreement, and You consen". to the jurisdiction of such courts for any such action or proceeding. 8.5 Govemin0 Law and Venue if You are not located in the USA. This Agreement shall be govemed by the laws of the Province of Ontario in Canada if You are not located in the USA _ No choice of laws rubes of any jurisdiction shall apply to this Agreement_ You consent and agree that the courts of the Province of Ontario in Canada shall have jurisdiction over any legal action or proceeding brought by You arising out of or relating ^o this Agreement, and You consent to the jurisdiction of such courts for any such action or proceeding. 5.8 Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire understanding and agreement between You and Eclipse Corporajon with respect to the subject matter hereof, and it supersedes all prior negotiations, commitments and understandings, verbal or written, and purchase order issued by You. This Agreement may be amended or otherwise modified by Eclipse Corporation from time to time and the most recent version of the Agreement will be available on the Eclipse Corporation website w wwr.docorigin.com_ Last Updated: July 22, 201T M. ••:;:•. tyles Staff: David Whitaker, Assistant City Agenda: Engineer 1/19/2021 SUBJECT A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for the 2020 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), a grant program, for Kingshighway/Maria Louise Lane/North Cape Rock Drive Pedestrian Improvements, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The attached resolution authorizes the City Manager to apply for the 2020 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), a grant program, for Kingshighway/Maria Louise Lane/North Cape Rock Drive Pedestrian Improvements. The majority of work is expected to take place within City right-of-way. The resolution states the City's willingness to commit to the project's development, implementation, construction, maintenance, management, and financing. The application deadline is January 29, 2021, and City staff are continuing to finalize the City's application. A draft of the application is attached for reference. FINANCIAL IWACT The TAP is an 80/20 grant program. The City will be responsible for 20% of the project's funding. Funding for the improvements will come from Transportation Trust Fund 5 Safety funds. SUSTAINABILITY: ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IWACTS Benefits of the program include enabling the City's citizens, including those with disabilities, to safely cross Kingshighway and to walk along safe infrastructure to access businesses, churches, and recreational facilities. This program provides for decreased traffic congestion and improved health. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council, by motion, approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for 2020 Transportation Alternatives Program grant funds for the Kingshighway/Maria Louise Lane/North Cape Rock Drive Pedestrian Improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: D Gant MoDot.12edestrian.inrovermnts.TAP.2020.doc Resolution D 2020 TAP Application Form and attachments.pdf DRAFT Application BILL NO. 21-10 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN THE MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND COMMISSION FOR THE 2020 ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM GRANT, IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER NECESSARY GRANT DOCUMENTS RESOLUTION NO. APPLICATION TO TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION FOR PEDESTRIAN CITY, AND TO EXECUTE ALL BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1. The City Manager, for and on behalf of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, is hereby authorized to execute an application to the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission for the 2020 Transportation Alternatives Program Grant, for pedestrian improvements along Kingshighway, Maria Louise Lane, and North Cape Rock Drive, and is hereby authorized to execute all necessary grant documents. Summaries of said Application are attached to this Resolution and made a part hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF Bob Fox, Mayor ATTEST: Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk 2021. TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2020 APPLICATION FORM Additional information can be found in the Transportation Alternatives Program Guide: https://www.modot.org/local-public-agency 1. Project Sponsor Name City of Cape Girardeau 2. Project Sponsor Type City 3. Project Sponsor Contact Information Contact Person: Scott Meyer Title: City Manager Mailing Address: 401 Independence Street City: Cape Girardeau Zip Code: 63703 Daytime Telephone: 573-339-6320 Email: smeyer@CityofCapeGirardeau.org 4. Project Name Kingshighway/Cape Rock Drive/Maria Louise Lane Crosswalk State: MO 5. Eligible Project Category (2) Construction of infrastructure -related projects and systems that will provide safer routes for non -drivers 6. Project Location County: Cape Girardeau County MoDOT District: Southeast Provide Project location map (Label attachment as 'Attachment A - Project Location Map') Project Route: Maria Louise Lane/Kingshighway From/To: North Cape Rock Drive/Kingshighway Project Length (feet/miles), if applicable: approx. 75 LF 7. Will this project impact MoDOT Right of Way? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No If Yes, provide letter of consent from the MoDOT Area Engineer per Section A.10. of the 2020 TAP Guide. 8. Based on 2010 Census data, is the project located in an area with a population of: ❑ 5,000 or fewer ❑✓ 5,001 to 200,000 9. Project Sponsor has completed MoDOT online LPA training within the past 2 years? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No Name and title of person in Responsible Charge: David Whitaker 10. Does the Project Sponsor have an active or incomplete SRTS, TE or TAP project? (0-5 pts.) ❑ Yes ❑✓ No If Yes, provide the Federal Project Number(s): 1 of 6 11. Project Description (0-40 pts.) (Refer to Sec F of the 2020 TAP Guide, Limited to 3500 Characters with spaces) The City of Cape Girardeau wishes to construct crosswalks with pedestrian signals at the intersection of US 61/North Kingshighway and Maria Louise Lane/N. Cape Rock Drive. US 61/North Kingshighway is a major north/south corridor in the City of Cape Girardeau with an annual average daily traffic count of 16,232 within this intersection. The proposed intersection serves Arena Park, the Municipal Court, the Cape Girardeau Police Headquarters, a number of local businesses on both the east and west sides of US 61/Kingshighway, and a religious center. Arena Park hosts many events throughout the year such as craft shows, fairs, expos, concerts, sports, and livestock shows which draw thousands of community members and visitors, greatly increasing the number of pedestrians accessing the park. Among these events is the SEMO District Fair, which lasts one to two weeks and it is estimated that 2,500 people try to exit the park at one time. The recent construction of the Municipal Court and Police Headquarters along Marie Louise Lane has also increased the amount of foot traffic in the area. In April 2020, the City of Cape Girardeau was awarded MoDOT's Traffic Engineering Assistance Program (TEAP) that assisted in funding an intersection study of Maria Louise Lane/Kiwanis Drive/North Broadview Street. The study cited previous conversations between City Officials and MoDOT about providing pedestrian facilities along US -61/N Kingshighway Street since there are no pedestrian accommodations in this area. The study also highlighted road realignments and alternate traffic flows to enhance pedestrian and vehicular safety concerns. In 2019, voters passed the sixth Transportation Trust Fund (TTF6) sales tax initiative. TTF6 funds will now provide for the detailed design and construction plans to develop the recommendations within the study. This realignment will certainly benefit the vehicular traffic flow at the intersection of North Kingshighway and Maria Louise Lane/N. Cape Rock Drive. The proposed North Kingshighway and Maria Louise Lane/N. Cape Rock Drive intersection improvements will include a crosswalk along the high traffic US 61/Kingshighway intersection and upgrade the signal to include pedestrian signals. A crosswalk will also be added to the N. Cape Rock Drive side of the intersection to enhance the safety of pedestrians accessing the local businesses and religious center on the east side of US 61/Kingshighway. Finally, a crosswalk will be added to the southern leg of Maria Louise Lane to connect pedestrians to the signalized US 61/Kingshighway crossing. Pedestrian safety concerns relative to this intersection have been shared by members of the public and City officials. This was significantly heightened during an extremely unfortunate pedestrian involved accident that resulted in severe injury to the pedestrian attempting to cross this intersection on December 13, 2019. Constructing these intersection improvements will greatly enhance the pedestrian safety and quality of life for the largely populated surrounding neighborhoods as well as the many people who visit Arena Park, the municipal court/police station, local businesses, and religious center. Items 12 - 14 (0-5 pts.) 12. Project Information (Location map showing project limits required) (No more than 10 pages) Directional Maps, Site Maps, and Photographs. (Label Attachment as 'Attachment B - Project Information') 13. Official Project Sponsor Funding Resolution (No more than 10 pages) (Label attachment as 'Attachment C - Certification of Funding and Support') A Resolution is REQUIRED for application to be considered for award of funding. 14. MPO / RPC Letter of Support (if applicable) (No more than 10 pages) (Label attachment as 'Attachment D - MPO/RPC Letter of Support') 2 of 6 15. Evidence of Public Involvement and Support (0-5 pts.) Attach letters of support and other documentary evidence of public interest. (Label attachments as 'Attachment E - Evidence of Public Involvement and Support') (No more than 10 pages) Provide evidence of public involvement summary, include dates and information about public meetings and events held to discuss the project. (Limited to 1,640 Characters with spaces) On December 13, 2019, there was a pedestrian struck and severely injured at this intersection. Often, adults and children are seen walking along US 61/Kingshighway throughout the City. City staff has received several requests to install push button pedestrian signals from concerned motorists witnessing pedestrians attempting to cross intersections along this route. This particular intersection has experienced notable foot traffic with events being held at Arena Park as well as the recent construction of the new municipal court/police station located on Marie Louise Drive. Pedestrians are often utilizing this intersection to travel to and from court dates or to speak with local law enforcement. At a SEMPO Board of Directors meeting on December 18, 2019, Reverend Renita Green spoke in great advocacy of the need for a crosswalk in this location stating that many pedestrians choose to park at the St. Andrew Lutheran Church located on the east side of US 61/Kingshighway to access Arena Park or the municipal court/police station, both of which are located just on the west side of US 61/Kingshighway at this intersection. 16. If submitting more than 1 TAP application, please rank the priority of this submittal. of I (Examples: 1 of 1, 2 of 4, 1 of 3) 17. Property Ownership and Acquisition Information (No more than 10 pages) All proposals must provide documentation of the Sponsor's property rights by title of ownership, lease, or easement for all property within the project limits. (Label attachments as 'Attachment F - Property Ownership and Acquisition Information') Is the property needed for the project already acquired? ❑ Yes ❑ No If No - How will it be acquired? If Yes - When was the property acquired and how? No, City staff or the consultant would negotiate any Temporary Construction Easements, Permanent Easements,or Right of Way necessary for the project, pursuant to MoDOT requirements. Was the property acquired in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No 18. Will this project reconstruct existing infrastructure and/or address existing barriers to access? Describe below. (0-10 pts.) ❑✓ Yes ❑ No If your entity has adopted an ADA Transition Plan, include as 'Attachment G - Transition Plan'. ie proposed crosswalk and connecting sidewalk infrastructure will enhance pedestrian :cessibility and safety of travel to municipal facilities, park amenities, local businesses and ligious centers. '41 on 19. Railroad Right of Entry Letter/Agreement (if applicable) Projects proposing to encroach or cross railroad right of way, must include documentary evidence from the railroad granting a right of entry or an executed encroachment agreement. (Label attachment as 'Attachment H - Railroad Right of Entry Letter/Agreement') 20. Local Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan (if applicable) If the proposed project will construct facilities for bicycles and/or pedestrians, include documentary evidence from the City or County stating that the project has been included in the entity's bicycle/pedestrian plan, or the bicycle/pedestrian component of an adopted local or regional plan. (Label attachment as 'Attachment I - Local Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan') 21. Project is a recommendation from TEAP or other planning study implementation? (0-5 pts.) If yes, attach a copy of the study and note where this project is identified (Label attachment as 'Attachment T) ❑✓ Yes ❑ No 22. Project Implementation Schedule* Estimate the amount of time it will take to complete the project from start to finish. Approximate the time required for each activity. The activities can run concurrently causing the total time to be different from the total of the activities. Consider time for, but not limited to: Months Planning Activities (Executing contract, hiring consultant, planning, schematic and design, utility relocation, etc. ) E Environmental Clearance (Assessments, possible mitigation for Hazardous Materials, permits, review by other agencies) ROW Acquisition (Surveying, appraisals, title transfer, clearance, etc. ) Project Design and Plan Preparation of PS&E Package (Including PS&E Review by MoDOT District and other agencies.) ] Project Construction/Implementation (Advertising/hiring contractor, demolition, construction, inspection, etc. ) ]Other ] Projected Time in Months I o I (— 23 months) *Per Reasonable Progress Policy, construction contract must be awarded within 23 months of funding allocation 23. Maintenance and Operations (0-5 pts.) Identify all parties responsible for short and long term maintenance and operation. The City of Cape Girardeau would be responsible for the maintenance and operation of the proposed sidewalk. The MHTC would maintain and operate the pedestrian signal and crosswalk. Will sponsor be able to maintain improvements for a minimum of 25 years? ❑ Yes ❑ No Estimate all maintenance and operations costs for the project below. (yearly basis) Maintenance Task Task Cost Freq. Annual Cost $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 TOTAL $ 0.00 4 of 6 24. Itemized Budget (0-15 pts.) (Label Attachment as 'Attachment K - Itemized Budget') Example of Itemized Construction Cost Estimate: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, PHASE 111 Item No- Descrin0ion Unit Ouantlly Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 17,100.00 $ 17100.00 2 REMOVAL OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS LS 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20 000.00 3 SEEDING AND MULCH AC 0.15 $ 12,500.00 $ 1,87500 4 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 5 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $ 2,50000 $ 2,50000 6 CURB & GUTTER LF 250 $ 24.00 $ 6p(1000 8 BLOCK RETAINING WALL 0-0' TALL LF 1,480 $ 70.00 $ 103 60000 9 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS 4" THICK 5' WIDE INCLUDING RAMPS SY 1,386 $ 50.00 $ 69 300.00 10 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES,. 6" THICK, 6' WIDE (3 LOCATIONS) SY 52 $ 15060 $ 7,800.00 11 HANDRAILING LF 470 $ 12500 $ 21250.00 12 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES, 8" THICK VARYING WIDTH SY 315 $ 75.00 $ 23 625.00 13 ADA DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS SF 60 $ 3060 $ 1,80000 14 TYPE 5 AGGREGATE BASE SY 1,771 $ 960 $ 15,93900 15 HIGH BUILD ACRYLIC WATERBORNE PAVEMENT MARKING PAINT 6" $ 860 $ 960.00 16 PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING, 3D"WHITE MID BLOCK EACH 8 $ 25000 $ 2,00000 17 PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING, 12" WHITE YIELD LINE TRIANGLES EACH 16 $ 5060 $ 800.00 18 PERMANENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNING SF 36 $ 4060 $ 1,44000 11 5 of 6 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 209,48900 CONTINGENCIES @ 5% $ 15,000 00 PROJECT COST TOTAL $ 314,489-00 25. Project Budget Summary (0, 5, or 10 pts.) List all project costs to be incurred by the applying entity on page 5 for a complete itemized cost estimate. Preliminary Engineering/Design (if requesting reimbursement) 1 . Right of Way costs (if requesting reimbursement) 2 . Itemized Construction Cost Estimate: (from Attachment K) 3 . Construction Engineering/Inspection (if requesting reimbursement) 4 . Subtotal of Costs (Line 1 - Line 4): 5 . I $ 0.00 Other eligible costs 6 . (provide attachment with detailed explanation) Total Project Cost: 7 . I $ 0.00 Local Match: or hof Total Project Cost (Line 7) 8 . $ 0.00 Federal Funds Requested: g00% of Line 7 9.I $ 0.00 The minimum amount of local cash match required is 20%, Sponsors are not limited in their maximum local match. If a larger local match is provided, please adjust the percentages accordingly. 20-24% local match earns 0 pts., 25-35% match earns 5 pts., >35% match earns 10 pts.) 26. Project Commitment By submitting an application, the applying entity commits that if this project is selected for funding, a construction contract will be awarded within 23 months of project funding allocation. The construction plans for this project are currently: ❑ Complete % Complete ❑ Not Started Completed TAP application packets must be submitted by email to the respective District representative and be received by 4:00 p.m. on January 29, 2021. MoDOT reserves the right to deem a TAP application package ineligible for funding if not received by the prescribed deadline. In the event an LPA is unable to provide an emailed PDF copy of the application; the LPA shall coordinate with the district representative and deliver the completed project application by prescribed deadline. FINAL SUBMISSION DUE DATE FOR ALL DOCUMENTATION January 29, 2021 by 4:00pm CDT 6 of 6 City of Cape Girardeau TAP Application US 61/Kingshighway &Cape Rock Drive/Kiwanis Drive Pedestrian Crosswalk Application Attachments i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development 6. Project Location Map - Attachment A - Project Location Map Provide Project location map (Label attachment as 'Attachment A -Project Location Map') City of ,apse Girardeau f . Transportation Alternatives Program Sidewalk along N Kingshighway, Maria Louise ,Ln, and loll Cape Rock Dr. � l , 6 i f iiiy � � Al I uqC'� r q 0 BOU !31(5 19V L7 TUNE TE WttAYTE WHWAY HOPPER 203 Pmject t_ocaffon 01 Y Legend Street Centerlines i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development 12. Project Information - Attachment B - Project Information (Location map showing project limits required) (No more than 10 pages) Directional Maps, Site Maps, and Photographs. (Label Attachment as 'Attachment B - Project Information') Directional Maps I A4ARs City of Cape Girardeau Transportation Alternatives Program Sidewalk along N Kingshighway, Maria Louise Ln, and N Cape Rock Dr. 'll - _ --�_ Siragre Family _ . Suburban Residential �r �rt7rr7f'rcrt�! Area - I I i W j rr C] Aren a Pafk r Z KtWVANlS Prrap..d Sidewalk Z C� _ U7 I I I I I I I I - 1i - I I - �rI'jIIII Area I Legend 1 4W E Parcel Lines Street Centerlines I - I , I i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development Site Maps •833-. •839N ??'' n" 825 :-83 ,102 X823 835102 a 2530 - .,•821 *835101' P1- • 819- 829 7 2520 � Text AEU , fv �►, 1033 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT For Purpose of Discussion Only Subject to Change ^� 627 619 615 10 -------- � 6-i56f IS i i I � 1 1 f 1102 ■ � I 4 -01 UP + 1 2331; ! •6o1 661 •601101 ° 71 4 f j •525 x565 •550 t _ CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU - 2020 TAP GRANT APPLICATION 140 70 0 140 Feet i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development Photographs 2020 TAP Application - Street Views US 61/Kingshighway - Northbound US 61/Kingshighway - Southbound i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development Cape Rock Drive - Facing West Toward Arena Park Maria Louise Lane & Broadview Drive Intersection - Facing East i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development Kiwanis Drive & US 61/Kingshighway Intersection - Facing East Maria Louise Lane & Kiwanis Drive Intersection - Facing South i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development 13. Official Project Sponsor Funding Resolution - Attachment C - Certification of Funding and Support i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development 14. MPO/RPC Letter of Support - Attachment D - MPO/RPC Letter of Support i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development 15. Public Involvement - Attachment E - Evidence of Public Involvement and Support CITY o CAPE + IRARDEAU L20LICF rFPARTMENT I cembor22,2@x0 Missouri Department of Transp orlation 105 W. Capitol Awnrus Jefferson City, MO 65102 To Whoin Jt May Coni, This letter is to advises you of the City of Cape Girardeau Police Depwtnent's rapport for a Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) gr nt pnrjcet for funding sof crosawalks within the City of Cape CirardeRu. I have reviewed the project proposing pedestrian en)%swalks W IC.tngshighway and Kiwanis Drive, and larxgshighway and Cape Rock Drive. I soul txcitmi about the potential of this prospective project and support its funding. Over the past scwcral yzars, we have witnc sed mounfing safety hmards at these location Lilac to on increase in foot traffic crossing. Kin highnway to access amenities an either side of the roadway. These highly trafficked areas include: a religious omter, a large park, multiple butainemes, and the PoliccMunicipal Court aamplex. Arena Park is host to a multitude of'large events throughout the }fear. Additionally, the park is home to the annual SEMO District Fair. Our ins for ped trim safety at these highly utilized iota cfions were heightened on December 13, 2019. On this unfortunate night, a pedestrian wag struck attempting to cross Kingshighway after dark. This incident left the pedestrian with severe, life-threatening; injuries that resulted in a multi -week stay at a St. Louis hospital. It is our sincere desire to see safety improved for the ci ti zona and visitors to our community. We believe that funding of this project will aecimplisb that gual and bu beneficial to citizew of Cape Girardeau and tate visitors from the entire Southeast Missouri region that attend "cuts in our city. Regards, Chief of Police Cape IGira &au Police Departmeat 40 & Spring Street Cape GiraMeau, MO 61703 (573) 339-6735 Offl (573) 339-5361 Fax dMIM qF 4±1 SouAh Sprlgg Shpel Cape 0rardimu, MO rW 57s c�35-d 1 Pel 573 8 Fax �Flyafeapeorie�e k:oamlcap�oll� i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 1 Tel (573) 339-6303 1 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development https://www.semissourian.com/story/2655134.html °T LER GR. EF — tgraet semis ouirian.com Print Email link Send nmvs tip Report error M Comments V Vle4`ti 6 cominent ai respond Cammunit; d russionis important, and we encourage you to participate as a reader andcommenter. Click hereto see our Guidelines. We also encourage registered users to let us kmo-.v if thea see something inappropriate on our site. You can do that b-,- clicking "Report Comment" below. Our goal is to create a place: for robust and aszl discourse about our communit,7, :state and nation. Haiv Fast ivas the car going?" Were they in the CrossW alk? How is the Person that Got Hit? -- Pasted by Howard S Howes on Sat, Dec 141 2o1g, at 9:35 AII°I �a Respect comment (1) Don't respect (6) Report comment to editor Haivard, there are no crossivalks. There is not a crosswalk that allows you to cross that highway. I had, that discussion ,%ith the group that vas investigating how to make this area .safer for bikers. I` oivhere is there a crossivalk on Kingshighivay/Business 55/Hlry 61 in Cape Girardeau County. It is not easy -to be a pedestrian in this, county. -- Posted by greg talbut on Sat, Dec 14; 2019, at 7:2? PAI Respect comment (4) Don't respect (o) Report comment to editor She ivas headed to St. Andrew for dinner.. I agree, ive must have a crossivalk. * Crystals Crossing -- Posted by renita green on Mon, Dec 16, 2019, at 1:30 I Respect comment Ci) Don't respect (q) Report comment to editor i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development Southeast Metropolitan Planning Organization Board Minutes 12-18-2019 Public Comments Retarding Items Not on the Agenda 9Southeast SIEMPO Metropolitan Planning Organization BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES December 1 B, 2019 Osage Centre — Cape Girardeau, MSD Board Voting Members Present: Mr_ Bob Fox„ City of Carpe Girardeau Mr_ Dwain Hahs, City of Jackson Mr. Scutt Meyer, City of Cape Girardeau Mr- Torn Mogelnicki, Cape Girardeau. County Transit Authority (CTA) Mr_ Jim Roach, City of Jackson Mr. Jeremy Tanz, Southeast Missouri Regional Planning & Economic Development Commission (SEMO RPC) Board Non -Voting Members Present: Mr- Cary Harbison, Southeast Missouri Regional Part Authority (SEMCI Part) Mr_ Marr Shelton — Missouri Department of Transportabon (MODOT) Mr- Kirk Sandfort — Southeast Missouri State University (SEMO) (alternate for Kathy Mangels) Technical Planning Committee (TPC;) Members Present: Mr_ Rodney Bollinger, City of Jackson Mr_ Drew Christian, Southeast Missouri Regional Planning & Economic Development Commission (SEMO RPC) Mr_ Alex McElroy, City of Cape Girardeau Ms_ Kelley Watson, Cape Girardeau County Transit Authority (CTA) Mr- Thomas Caldwell, Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) Mr_ Joe Killian, Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDGT) Mr- Brian Okenfuss, Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Ms. Eva Voss, Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDGT) Staff Present - Mr. Ryan Shrimplin, City of Cape Girardeau Program Administration/Support Consultant Present: Ms. Kelly Green, KLG Engineering Ms. Marla Mills, KLG Engineering i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development Southeast Metropolitan Planning Organization Board Meeting Minutes December 18, 20-19 Page 2 of 6 Others Present: Mr. Clay Randal, Penzel Mr. Howard Hemmann, Penzel Mr. Rick McGuire, Laborers 1104 Mr. Tim Bomemar. Laborers 1104 Mr. Steven Hof, Teamsters 00 Mr. Ben Matthews, Southeast Missourian Mr. David McMullin, Fronabarger Concreters, Inc_ Mr. Greg Dullum, The Cash Book Journal Rev. Renita Green, Peoples Shelter Mr. Robin Cole, The Rite Group Mr. Brian Gerau, Jackson Chamber of Commerce Mr. Ed Ross, Ross Furniture, Inc. Call to Order Chairman Fox called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m- lntrochicfionS The group went around the room, with each person giving a brief introduction. Adoption of Agenda The agenda of the December 18, 2019 Board of Directors Meeting was unanimously approved upon motion made by Mr- Roach and seconded by Mr- Mogelnicki. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the October 16, 2019 Board of Directors Meeting were unanimously approved upon motion made by Mr- Meyer and seconded by Mr. Hahs- Communications from the Chairman Chairman Fox wanted to wish everyone a Merry Christmas. Public Comments Regarding Items Not on the Agenda Chairman Fox asked if there are any comments from the public regarding items not on the agenda. ReverendRenita Green — People's Shelter and St- James AME Church addressed the Board- She noted that a pedestrian was recently hit by a vehicle crossing Kingshighway at Cape Rock Drive. Although she received some severe injuries, she is expected to recover- Rev- Green noted that the pedestrian does suffer mental health issues- She was on her way to St- Andrew Lutheran Church for dinner. Rev- Green noted that she 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 1 Tel (573) 339-6303 1 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development Southeast Metropolitan Planning Organization Board Meeting Minutes December 18, 2019 Page 3 of 6 understands that MoDOT is in charge of the intersection. Rev. Green request that a crossing be addressed and that the project become a high priority_ She understands that the process takes time and that there likely are already discussions but she requested this not be pushed to the back burner. Rev_ Green noted that the safety of our citizens is extremely important. There is a lot of foot traffic at that intersection as people walk to court and sometimes park at church to walk to police station or to the park. Crossing at the tunnel is not realistic. Rev. Green knows this could take time but would like MoDOT to explore a temporary solution rather than waiting for a longer-term solution. She noted that if it surfaces at this Board meeting than maybe it can rise up in priority. Naw/Unfinished Business + RESOLUTION NO. 2019-08, A Resolution approving Amendment No. 2 to the FY 2020-2023 Transportation Improvement Program - Reading and Passage Chairman Fox introduced RESOLUTION NO. 2010-00. Mr. Christian explainer] that Amendment 2 is a scoping project on Rte. K from MO 25 to Siemers drive. The cost under this amendment is approximately $75,000. The construction is estimated at $1-2 million but that is not part of this Amendment. A motion was made by Mr. Hahs and seconded by Mr. Mogelnicki to approve Resolution No. 2010-08, which passed unanimously_ + RESOLUTION NO. 2019-09, A Resolution supporting MoDOT and ]DOT Safety Performance Measure Targets - Reading and Passage Chairman Fax introduced RESOLUTION NO. 2010-00. Mr. Shrimplin explained that SEMPO had the option to set its own safety targets or to support MoDOT and IDOT targets. The TPC recommended supporting the state targets. A motion was made by Mr. Hahs seconded by Mr. Tanz to approve Resolution No. 2010-00, which passed unanimously. * FY 2021 Unified Planning Work Program - Discussion of Activities to be Programmed Mr. Shrimplin explained that it is time to begin discussions concerning the FY 2021 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) budget and work. By June, the Board will need to adopt the FY 2021 work program. The FY 2020 UPWP included the ADA Assessment. We have since found that the ADA transition plan is not allowable under the federal program. A proposal will come before the TPC from a consultant under an on-call agreement. This project will need to be carried over to the FY 2021 UPWP. It is also time to update the 2010-2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), which was adopted February 17, 2016. The MTP is to be updated every 5 years and amended as needed. The MTP will include a public process as well. Bath of these are big items to include in the FY 2021 UPWP. Mr. Shrimplin noted that with the transition to a new director, continuation of these two big items will probably be sufficient. Mr. Shrimplin i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 1 Tel (573) 339-6303 1 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development Southeast Metropolitan Planning Organization Board Meeting Minutes December 18, 2019 Page 4 of 6 asked if anyone had additional ideas for the FY 2021 UPWP with no comments. He noted that TPC will be consulted as well - Center Junction Diveraina Diamond Interchange Project — Discussion of Bid Results Mr. Shelton reported that there were 5 bidders- All the information is public knowledge. Penzel Construction Co., Inc- was apparent low bidder- The Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission (MHTC) will take official action on the bids at the January 9 meeting in Jefferson City. Mr- Hahs asked if there is a recommendation from MoDOT and how it would be determined. Mr. Shelton noted that many things go into the decision- Mr- Hahs asked how the bids compare to the estimate. Mr- Shelton noted that $16.5 million was the STIP amendment. He rioted that if the MHTC accepts the bid, MoDOT is ready to go but he was unsure if a TIP amendment will have to occur_ Mr. Christian and Mr- Shrimplin rioted that there is a 15% administrative relief. Mr. Shelton confirmed that $16.5 was construction dollars- Mr. Hahs asked if that included the city contributions. Mr. Shelton said that it did. Mr. Hahs noted that the City of Jackson is holding the contracts for the city work until the state approves the project. Mr. Roach asked if the bid was within a range that could be awarded. Mr. Shelton said that he could not speculate on that. MHTC will accept or reject the bid- Mr. Fox asked if it was the normal action of MHTC to accept a bid that is higher- Mr. Shelton said sometimes but not always. Mr. Gerau noted that earlier MHTC was asked for additional funds for the project but none were available- He asked what would be the difference between then and now. Mr- Shelton said MHTC will have to make the final determination. Member Reports City of Cape Girardeau — Chairman Fox reported that the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF) 6 vote is in April- The committee presented 2 alternatives for $25 million. The Council is looking at it 2 different ways.. They are waiting to hear about the Governor's grant to see if it might pay for a Veterans Memorial Drive- TTF has been successful in the past 25 years. The City has done what they said they would do and did not borrow money- The West End Blvd project is proceeding in that the utilities are cutting trees and relocating their infrastructure. The design of Fountain Street and Independence Street are proceeding. There are some major projects to be completed with TTF5. Maintenance projects have slowed during winter months. Mr. Meyer noted that Mr. McElroy is to become the Executive Director of SEMIPO- The Memorandum of Understanding between the participating jurisdictions for SEMPO states that the administrative services and staff support for SEl!►+1PO activities is designated to the City of Cape Girardeau. Mr. Shrimplin has performed exemplary work in fulfilling these duties but he does riot have enough time to dedicate to the organization given his other responsibilities as City Planner. The transition will not require any additional funding- He thanked Mr- Shrimplin and KLG Engineering for their work - 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 1 Tel (573) 339-6303 1 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development Southeast Metropolitan Planning Organization Board Meeting Minutes December 18, 2019 Page 6 of 6 review and finalize the proposal, after which it will be presented to the TPC for a recommendation and then to the Board for authorization to proceed_ He said to note, that the TPC January meeting has been moved back one week. Due to Now Years, the meeting will be held on January 8_ OtherBusiness and Communications There was no other business or communications_ Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting was unanimously adjourned at 2A1 p.m. upon motion made by Mr- Mogelnicki and seconded by Mr. Hahs. Respectfully submitted, Kelly Green, KL G Engineering 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 1 Tel (573) 339-6303 1 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development 17. Attachment F — Property Ownership The attached map shows parcel information obtained from the Cape Girardeau County Recorder's Office. The area within the project limits (Kingshighway, Maria Louise Lane, and Cape Rock Drive) is shown to be dedicated right of way. The Cape Girardeau County parcel card for the subject property is attached. A dedicated easement is also shown in the area proposed to connect sidewalk to Kingsway Drive. i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 1 Tel (573) 339-6303 1 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development :it► of Cape Girardeau Transportation Alternatives Program Sidewalk along N Kingshighway, Maria Louise Ln, and N Cape Rock Lir. oannercol Area Arena Park K WAMS Proposed Sidewalk Single Family Suburban Residerrtiat � I I it U iIt f I , Con7m. ercial Area G, Legend Parcel Limes .street Centerlines 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 1 Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development to i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 1 Tel (573) 339-6303 1 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development I o N N � 3 [ ( dY l U Z Z 'O a 0 0 0 O t 0 1 E 1b NUE A a N d R m v v x l7 b U o � a - q O0 4 Q J (L fJ � N � i O b O Q 11J ON V Z R o 0 o .a 0 � f v v �D c � N v CL ro v R CL mD ii a H u �E b a H a j m ai to v o v m dd o v w a m ti �a n n o o 0 0 a z c p 07 n w a 0 N z a v 3 CCL o W O Z Z Z Z Z Z 1y4j V a N V1 (U J rl Z D qKq CT. W a v R Q m A c 3 ,o H b 0 u w Z a 7= z a W 11J W N O Y o_ 7 a K Z� LU rna E P o � ED w r 2 p vl V q' lJ to i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 1 Tel (573) 339-6303 1 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 Tel (573) 339-6303 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development LL O a V 4 h L7LLIW UI U1 V' C R � l7 V Q O C b l7 W p H N N � 4 d d � m In C m m V F a a +a N H Doa a 0. a a � 0 0 H of [] o a N P n m _ c J a nA a o� DO iL a a o 0 0 a R v x O D � � e 0 R O v w i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 Tel (573) 339-6303 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development LL O a V 4 h L7LLIW UI U1 V' C R � l7 V Q O C b l7 W p H N N � 4 d d � m In C m m V F a a +a N H Doa a 0. a a � 0 0 H of [] o a N P n m _ c J a nA a o� DO iL a a o 0 0 a R v x O D � � i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 Tel (573) 339-6303 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development LL O V L7LLIW UI U1 V' C R � l7 V O C b l7 W p N N � 4 d � m In C m V a a m N Doa a N of [] o N P n m _ i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 Tel (573) 339-6303 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development 04Uat nth' F3 {0411 {.'klhw 31 dWorl mat Perm � i'gmd x rv34'1`, 1 .� 11 Z 1, � t4 ' l SYMBOLS LEGEND 1 1. • - I f2' IRDN RODS iSET}. 41 ■- 1/2- IRON RODS (F1NE7) 1 3 C - 5/5' IRC ROCKS {FNG7 - Sy 4 = 1 IRC. BAR (FF,1y liyl . E%ISTINC 9119- ON CCR.*$R (FAD}, Y D E 5 C R I P T 1 0 N Survey For: The City 4issouri 1 rt of the NE 1/4 of Gnuot. BU in Survey X199, x Tntivn2.hip 31 North, Range 13 least in the City of Yt Cape Girardeau in Cape Girardliau County, Miasouiri s 1 It T x { r r RkL7 To TRACT_I. RFRi qF ASAnOGNEG R'.GHT Cr *AV OF MINGSw,iY 110.141= B€[NG A PAR- GF THE NORTHEAST CUAR•ER (NE 1/4. Or CUT LAT EO AND PART Of TFC SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE tf4) Of OUT LOT N6 IN SURWY 2199, TOMMSHIP 31 NORTH RANGE T3 EAST IN THE CITY AN} cOUNTY DF cAPE PRARDEAU COUNTY, LWSSCUTI! CONTAININ.0.. 7,'139 sgUARE FEET {MORE CR LESS), DESOTd9ED A.S FOLLOWS: Gemmenee at the 5.01,-k cunni M 9le HE 1/4 of Out Lot 90 or S>l-y 2199, T-Fip 31 MMh, Range 13 East (nalhlnq Found-- 1:--.Z:Ivzn rm- dc.del; thane, S 83'02'56' E. 4067E feat; thence 5 W, 20&54 iee! to a POY1l In Loa r,artNRiet Rig K1 of way Lna of Khga.py O•;.x; lhene• N S4'S1'CO W oiq Cl RB;d R;ghi. pi way Lh., 131.2E f-1:11_ eat 1aT Me Pain] o-7 Regnninq ihence'S A9' 11'15 w, 50.03 W Ip a yon{ :, the .-h Right of way Lila o4 King -y O'i ai khrrvae N 3951"OD' w .long 0114 tokj1k of Way Lino. 81058 foot i. a point In the East Right aI way LMe eF Ktngahlghrny (U. S. Mgh..Je E1),, 11,- nCfihNplirly glong the vc of o C-- to th. Len. haA,,g a Rook* of 1964,43 took and rHh .pial R' -)h! V Woy Lln*. 46,73 Not (Chard = r. 1B'10'55- W. 46.73 feet); ce N 3415'59• E .1-9 void Rqht of Ploy Lha. 14.16 Teri; m north. aaieFl4 ,-9 the arc of a Carve to the Left having a R.dlas .d 1997.06 fact and with acid Riga of Way Link 34.32^ Feet (Chwd N 1755'43- w• 3,,12 feet) Lm a Xni.k In 1h. nnfLhen.tarly Rigs: a.' Way Lina or h:n r_, 4r;.vp: L"._5 ML51'DO`£ d-7said Right or Wer Une, 18B 75 feet to 1h. Pat.1 .H Reglnnhq. SJBJECT TO 114E CITY gETANTiG .an E4SGWENT FM MAI.TAUNIND AHD/OR CO NS"RUCTW UTILITIES IN SAYE DEF MID ACP=S THE FOLLOW11I DESCR78£TT I AREA. -D SMT. Getmmanca a! the 5040.091 Ctv ne of the NE 1/4 of Out Lae 90 � S9rwy 2199, To.nehip ' N+xlhRouge t3 East (Imthing found--pMiki*. il,am delis}, :hence S 83YJYSd' E. 4DE.7B haat khm S 0720'1'0. w 2(19.540 e W a po3et In Mirrear 11-tarly gh ft, Un�MN e f Kngawry 0 I ane 39'34'00' w along card RIghL t Way L 131..29 flet f0r the Pp t f @prolog' tnrm,.,e 5 4811'15 w, 29.87 feel- Lnence N 36'15'12"' W. 156.1$ f+,el YO 4 Rdi^1 r 11+4 E -L Pighl F Way t -j oT Kingshgh..y (U.S. Nighwa} 81): thence. 34'1=5'59' E aI_ wla Flight of ■oy Lina. 7.53 Facet; theeloa narth.eaterly al"U-no oro ad a M- to tha LrH Mo- a Rod'Ua ai 19$7.[6 feet and .iM A64 Righl 0 Way Loa, 34.32 Feet [hard - H 1735'43' W. 34 3?. 1'p et) to a Pahl in the nprlh$48l.rly Rigni of Wgy U --,I R;ny .3y prise; Menu S 3g' 51'00' E _q -d Right .f Me Lne, 198.75 feet to the Pont of dinning. SUB -CCI T4 ALLEASEMENTS. RIC HTS. OF WAY, 11MRICTICKS. AND UOENSES AFFTCTING SAME, EITHER wiTTEra OR MJPLED. TRACT -2: PARI CF THE SOUTHEAST CUARTER {SE 1/4) tF OUT LJ57 40 N SUR%Ee 2199, 70*mSHIp 31 NOA rH, RANGE 13 EAST N THE UTY AHD COUNTY OF CAF_ GFfARDEALI COUNTY. MSS. CONTAINING 6.13; 59VARE FEET (KRE OFF LESS), OESG LIM A5 FOL44'SW;J Commence of the S-kfir at earner of the NE 1/4 ar a9q La BP of 51,0+01' 2'99. r meit, 31 N.N+. Raine 13 EdM (nolhng ro�-d--pombpn from daede); 'hence S 93',02'50' E. 40b.75 (eek; he- 5 167'20'10' W. 94.83 met To- the I"wro of Beghning thanoon[A4a S 07'2[.1'19" W!, 111.92 P®ek la a point 'n the n.rfh-t RHg ht M WAay LTi 0T K;ngin-y Priv.; th- N 3$51- "0' w alrr,g g"' Rghq aF Wfry M 131,2$ ra.L: ih.nae N 49'11' 13' E, 3.35 Taal le Lha Point at C.- of a Cane t. the Right ha ina a E. 0 59,00 fact: thence noriheosterly aiulg tom Ree M iia Cia-re to the Right 47.21 feet (Chard - N' 72'20'19' C. 45.81 feel) to the Paint of 'ralgant; thanra 5 9530'313• E, 58.5. feet la Rhe Pali: or 9eglning EAZEWNTS, RIGHTS OF WAV, RESTRC1014S AND LICENSES OTHER MITTEN OR [MPUEC_ N$ 1 1 8 0.4 .0, cri. �Sr^` 4' 21" (Wp 5t. Arndr, Lplh., t0a�c. N, "C�_ $144J 4wch) ,�,yg'ra fQS ,PA15C 47.1)1 5 4r f r o, P.P. Tr_1 P.D,9. x( i7y J �{rfr rylff 1• 3•�36'C } � s Y�yJrfy Jf P Eb14o21�D.t - 48'18'09• (N/F � AHd�gyt, Y to 0 5r t t'4, r f l X0+:75-1,@1441 rQ- 445) r °f W�py C?4i LIa U. 1 i 1 4 T PROPERTY MJR'JEY gASS..'HLIRAL' 7H$ 15 TO CERTIFY TrinT I I xy[ Su R'rt1EU HIL A0OVE MM-R19ED PMTCEl UF LAID AND HAVE PREPARED THE AN OED PLAT, WA -ICH IS A TRUE ANP CCRREIC4 REPRESENTATION OF SAID S1RVEr TO TF�E @EST OF MY A13UTr AND THAT 5410 PLAT AND SURVEY WERE DONE AV ALWRDANCE WTH THE CURRENT RHIULIUYS FOR "NO SUnEr5 ie THE STAVE OF NiSSDIJRI ,AS SE THE WISSOURl DEPARTMENT OF MA,70AL RESOURCES Lino Su DONE THIS 02 nd. DAr 6f .A.t_y :D ' 0179 PIYOIHY J SANDER-.2DD.301 14 7374 PERRY41LLf: ROAD CAPE GIRA.RDEAU. MISSOURI 63791 TITLE REFEREFn"£'S DOC. NO. 21105-13149 (SUB k AL14 r FEREMCES, 901111 11151, PA9= 445 (9..6 A A0J} DOC. H'2DD9-15:69 ADJ 1. NORTH PER FAST UNE OF RECORD PLAT OF AINKARP BOOK 4'.}0,. PACE 193 (AOL.' Su9DmstM (N 39'51'09' W)- 99119 232. PACE 151 LAD -J) 2. ABSTRACT OF MU BOOK 254, PAGE G9 CAM 3, RECQzQ PLAT (811. 14, PG. 87). 4. HIGHWAY PLANS RTE. 61 (N. IUWAH"WAr, S N/F = NOROR FORYETTa_Y. ASSLSSCR'S MAF NUPd9'eP. 19-929 9. P.0.9. =POINT OF SEUMIND. P. P.D.C. FOIHT OF COMWENCg4EN1T. ,pa NUAaTER 2003-500 & (NTS) - NOT T9 SCALE. 9. PT. - POINT LIF TfNMVT. O 30 50 90 10, R C - POINT IX C11R'.£. .. _ p - SCALE IN PEST /��Arp� FILED FOR RECORD THIS ,_...�_z-�.AT OF 20:(7 M SUiVE.x ,'tOI i RRY D. DO TI DY FLAT EOM AT PNC£ M THE OFFICE OF THE CAPE H2RARDEAU RECORDER 9F DEEDS N JACKSsom hurisoURI, I S1J RV C.. T 1IY Cr JANET ROBERT. RECD6➢ER (F DEEDS CAPS 91RAEDELU, Mit. 08741 CAPE SIRAMIZ4 COI.NTY WIS5a1RI 1 1 635- Hens 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 1 Tel (573) 339-6303 1 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development 20. Attachment I — Local Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan Attach SEMPO Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development 21. Attachment J — TEAP Study Add page references from the study discussing the intersection and include a copy of the study in the application. i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 1 Tel (573) 339-6303 1 Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development 24. Attachment K - Itemized Budget 2020 TAP Estimate Kingshighway - Cape Rock Crosswalk by TLR Jan 2021 Street Length = 0.2 miles (Kingshighway) Quantity Unit Cost Roadway Concrete Pavement (8 IN. Non- Reinf.) 844 SY $80 $67,520 Type 5 Aggregate for Base (4 IN. Thick) 2,133 SY $6 $12,798 Concrete Median 6 IN. 240 SY $55 $13,200 Integral Curb, (6 IN. & under) Type B 310 LF $20 $6,200 Curb and Gutter Type B (24" wide) 560 LF $30 $16,800 Pavement Repair 20 SY $120 $2,400 Concrete Sidewalk, 4 IN. 806 SY $55 $44,330 Concrete Curb Ramp 27 SY $55 $1,485 Truncated Domes 120 SF $28 $3,360 Paved Approach, 7 IN 167 SY $60 $10,020 Post, Signal 8 FT. 4 EA $1,000 $4,000 Signal Head, Type 1S, Pedestrian 4 EA $600 $2,400 Push Button Detector 4 EA $400 $1,600 "Software Module for Pedestrians" 1 EA $5,000 $5,000 Base, Concrete for Post 2 CY $2,000 $4,000 Pull Box, Preformed Class 2 4 EA $1,200 $4,800 2" Conduit Pushed 220 LF $15 $3,300 2" Conduit Trenched 30 LF $10 $300 Cable, 16 AWG 7 Conductor 850 LF $2 $1,360 Pull Box Adjustment 2 EA $1,000 $2,000 Manhole Frame & Cover, Type 3 2 EA $400 $800 Precast Concrete Drop Inlet 2 FT x 5 FT 6 LF $700 $4,200 Precast Concrete Drop Inlet 3 FT x 3 FT 3 LF $700 $2,100 Junction Box 3 LF $700 $2,100 15" Pipe Group A 230 LF $55 $12,650 15" FES Group A 1 EA $750 $750 Pipe Liner 50 LF $150 $7,500 Pavement Marking 1 LS $2,500 $2,500 Pavement Marking Removal 1 LS $500 $500 SH -Flat Sheet (permanent signs) 25 SF $22 $550 PSST Post, 2 IN., 12 GA 24 LF $12 $288 2.5 IN. Post Anchor 2 EA $50 $100 Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 Temporary Erosion Control 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 Removals 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 Seed/Mulch/Fertilizer 1 LS $2,500 $2,500 i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development Sub Total 1 Mobilization @ 5% Sub Total 2 Construction Contingency @5% Itemized Construction Cost Estimate PS&E Costs @ 7.5% Right of Way Costs Construction Engineering & Inspection @ 15% Light Pole Relocation (by Ameren) 2 EA $2,500 New Light Pole (by Ameren) 1 EA $2,500 Sign Relocation (12'x 24'H overhead sign) Subtotal Other Associated Costs TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE (FEDERAL & CITY MATCH COMBINED) Assumptions: UIP exist. traffic signal poles/mast arms ($50,000/each should relocation be necessary) Street pavement repair work needed on adjacent panels Inflation for future year construction not included No right of way cost to City assumed Grading costs conisdered incidental since minor quantities $288,411 $14,421 $302,832 $15,142 $317,973 $23,848 $0 $47,696 $5,000 $2,500 $5, $60,196 $402,017 i 401 Independence Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 (573) 339-6327 I Tel (573) 339-6303 I Fax www.cityofcapegirardeau.org/development Staff: Ryan Shrimplin, AICP - City Planner Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT Approval of the Partial Release of Performance Guarantee Agreement for Southeast Health West Campus. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The attached document releases a portion of the performance guarantee amount for public improvements in the Southeast Health West Campus subdivision (home of the new behavioral health hospital). Staff recommends approval of the Partial Release document, by motion. The water and sanitary sewer improvements covered by this Partial Release were accepted by the City Council on January 4, 2021. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On June 26, 2019, the City entered into a Performance Guarantee Agreement with Cape Girardeau Behavioral Health, LLC (the Developer) for public improvements in the Southeast Health West Campus subdivision (home of the new behavioral health hospital). The amount guaranteed by the Agreement was $145,620.00 which covered water, sanitary sewer, and sidewalks. The Developer has completed the water and sanitary sewer improvements, and is requesting a partial release in the amount of $111,276.00. The water and sanitary sewer improvements covered by this Partial Release were accepted by the City Council on January 4, 2021. The Partial Release document is attached. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Partial Release of Performance Guarantee Agreement for Southeast Health West Campus, by motion. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: © Partial Release of Perfommnce Guarantee Agreement - Southeast Health West Campus - January 2021.12df Partial Release of Performance Guarantee Agreement - Southeast Health West Campus PARTIAL RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE AGREEMENT SOUTHEAST HEALTH WEST CAMPUS This Partial Release is made this day of , 2021, by the CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, 401 Independence Street, Cape Girardeau, MO 63703, hereinafter referred to as the "City", to CAPE GIRARDEAU BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer". WITNESSETH: On June 26, 2019, the City and the Developer entered into a Performance Guarantee Agreement for public improvements in the Southeast Health West Campus subdivision, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. The City Council of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, has determined that a portion of the work covered by the Performance Guarantee Agreement for public improvements in said subdivision, as set out in the improvement plans and specifications therefore, has been satisfactorily completed. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the satisfactory completion of a portion of the public improvements set forth in the plans and specifications for said subdivision, the City hereby authorizes the release of $111,276.00 of the balance of the secured amount pursuant to the Performance Guarantee Agreement. The Developer is hereby discharged from said portion of its obligations to the City under the Performance Guarantee Agreement but is specifically not released and not discharged from the remainder of its obligations with respect to the Performance Guarantee Agreement, which shall remain in effect until the balance of the public improvements have been completed satisfactorily. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Partial Release has been executed as of the above date. ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI Scott A. Meyer, City Manager 1 STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) SS. COUNTY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU ) BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this day of , 2021, before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared Scott A. Meyer, who, being by me duly sworn, did state that he is the City Manager of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Missouri, and that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the seal of said City, and that said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said City by authority of its City Council, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal in the State and County aforesaid, the date first above written. Name/My Commission Expires: Notary Public 2 Staff: Anna Kangas, Interim Building and Agenda: Code Enforcement Manager 1/19/2021 SUBJECT An Ordinance authorizing the issuance of Special Tax Bills on certain properties for the securing of chronic nuisance properties and for nuisance abatements under the provisions of Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri 1 W4 3M 110 kly W3 110110110 The attached ordinance authorizes the issuance of special tax bills to recover costs incurred by the City in securing the chronic nuisance structures and abating nuisances at 16 North Henderson Street and 36/38 North Henderson Street. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On August 17, 2020, 16 North Henderson Street was declared a Chronic Nuisance under Chapter 17 of the City's Code of Ordinances. The owner failed to secure the property. As provided for in the Code, the City hired a contractor to secure the structure on October 23, 2020, at a cost of $1,350.56. In addition, the City incurred $426.47 in costs to abate nuisances on the property under the provisions of Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances. A special tax bill has been prepared for securing of the structure and the nuisance abatement costs. The special tax bill and the contractor's invoice are attached. Including interest fees, the special tax bill for this property is $1,787.03. Also on August 17, 2020, 36/38 North Henderson Street was declared a Chronic Nuisance under Chapter 17 of the City's Code of Ordinances. The owner failed to secure the property. As provided for in the Code, the City hired a contractor to secure the structure on October 23, 2020, at a cost of $1,431.42. In addition, the City incurred $563.28 in costs to abate nuisances on the property under the provisions of Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances. A special tax bill has been prepared for securing of the structure and the nuisance abatement costs. The special tax bill and the contractor's invoice are attached. Including interest fees, the special tax bill for this property is $2,013.97. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the ordinance authorizing the issuance of special tax bills for 16 North Henderson Street and 36/38 North Henderson Street. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: ® Ord -Closure Nuisance Abatements 36.38.16N.Henderson.doc Ordinance ® Tax Bill Nuisance Closure 36 38 North Henderson.docx Tax Bill, 36/38 N Henderson D Tax Bill Nuisance Closure 16 N. Henderson.doc Tax Bill, 16 N Henderson D Inv 5075.pdf Inwice 5075 D My 5131 rev.pdf Inwice 5131 BILL NO. 21-11 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX BILLS ON PROPERTIES FOR THE CLOSURE OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, AND FOR THE ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 17 AND CHAPTER 13 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU WHEREAS, the Abatement Hearing Officer of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, issued Orders causing certain dangerous buildings to be secured and closed pursuant to the City's chronic nuisance ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City of Cape Girardeau did cause said buildings to be closed in accordance with the Orders, thereby incurring certain expenses; and WHEREAS, the Building Supervisor authorized the issuance of certain tax bills; and WHEREAS, the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, issued Orders causing certain nuisances to be abated; and WHEREAS, the City of Cape Girardeau did cause said nuisances to be abated in accordance with the Orders, thereby incurring certain expenses; and WHEREAS, Chapter 17 and Chapter 13 of the City Code authorize the issuance of tax bills to recover said expenses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Article 1. There are hereby levied, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and ordered to place on file, the following Special Tax Bills issued in accordance with the Orders of the Nuisance Abatement Officer which shall be a lien against the following described properties in accordance with law, in the following amounts, until paid or collected by the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri: a.) 36/38 North Henderson - $1,933.11 PT Lot 7 Henderson Subdivision PT O.L. 10, in the City and County of Cape Girardeau, Missouri b.) 16 North Henderson - $1,867.89 PT Lot 7 & PT Lot 8 Henderson Subdivision SUBD PT O.L. 10, in the City and County of Cape Girardeau, Missouri ARTICLE 2. Said Tax Bills shall bear an interest rate of eight percent (80) per annum. ARTICLE 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2021. Bob Fox, Mayor ATTEST: Bruce Taylor, Deputy City Clerk No. Amount $1,933.11 SPECIAL TAX BILL FOR CLOSURE OF A DANGEROUS BUILDING AND ABATEMENT OF A NUISANCE To the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. For work done and costs and expenses incurred in abating a nuisance by closure of a dangerous building pursuant to the City's chronic nuisance ordinance contained in Chapter 17 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and chargeable against: Karen Schleyer 1024 William Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 for the following property: 36/38 North Henderson Avenue, Cape Girardeau, MO PT Lot 7 Henderson Subdivision PT O.L. 10 , in the City and County of Cape Girardeau, Missouri Parcel No. 21-106-00-19-022.00-0000 in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri; said building has been closed in accordance with the Order of the Abatement Hearing Officer dated August 17, 2020, and the cost incurred for closure and securing of the building was One Thousand, Three Hundred Fifty Dollars and Fifty-six Cents ($1,350.56); and For work done and costs and expenses incurred in abating a nuisance by the removal of trash and other prohibited items under the provisions of Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, said property has been cleared in accordance with the Order of the Abatement Hearing Officer, and the cost incurred for said abatement was Five Hundred Eighty-two Dollars and Fifty-five Cents ($582.55), including interest. I, Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, do hereby certify that the securing and closure of the property was done under the provisions of Chapter 17-300, and that the removal of trash and other prohibited items was done under the provisions of Chapter 13, and in accordance with the Order of the Abatement Hearing Officer. 1 I also certify that the costs and expenses incurred by the City for securing and closure of the property, and the removal of trash were One Thousand, Nine Hundred Thirty-three Dollars and Eleven Cents ($1,933.11), which amount the City Council has ordered assessed as a special tax against the following described property, to -wit: 36/38 North Henderson Avenue, Cape Girardeau, MO PT Lot 7 Henderson Subdivision PT O.L. 10, in the City and County of Cape Girardeau, Missouri the same being the sum fixed as costs by the report of the Building Supervisor and as costs incurred in the removal of trash from said property. This Special Tax Bill bears interest at the rate of eight per cent (80) per annum from sixty (60) days after its date and is a special lien against the land herein described. The lien hereof shall continue ten (10) years after the date of issue, unless sooner paid, and in the event suit is brought to enforce such lien, then until the expiration of such litigation. Issued by authority of Ordinance No. passed and adopted February 1, 2021. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, as City Clerk of the City of Girardeau, Missouri, I have hereunto set my hand under corporate seal of the said City this day of 2021. Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk [S E A L] STATE OF MISSOURI ) ss. COUNTY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU ) Cape the On this day of , 2021, before me appeared Gayle L. Conrad, to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that she is the City Clerk of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the seal of said City, and that the said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said City by authority of its City Council, and acknowledged said instrument 2 to be the free act and deed of said City. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal, at my office in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, the day and year first above written. My commission expires: Notary Public 3 No. Amount $1,867.89 SPECIAL TAX BILL FOR CLOSURE OF A DANGEROUS BUILDING AND ABATEMENT OF A NUISANCE To the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri. For work done and costs and expenses incurred in abating a nuisance by closure of a dangerous building pursuant to the City's chronic nuisance ordinance contained in Chapter 17 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and chargeable against: Karen Schleyer 1024 William Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 for the following property: 16 North Henderson Avenue, Cape Girardeau, MO PT Lot 7 & PT Lot 8 Henderson SUBD PT O.L. 10 , in the City and County of Cape Girardeau, Missouri Parcel No. 21-106-00-19-021.00-0000 in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri; said building has been closed in accordance with the Order of the Abatement Hearing Officer dated August 17, 2020, and the cost incurred for closure and securing of the building was One Thousand, Four Hundred Thirty-one Dollars and Forty-two Cents ($1,431.42); and For work done and costs and expenses incurred in abating a nuisance by the removal of trash and other prohibited items under the provisions of Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, said property has been cleared in accordance with the Order of the Abatement Hearing Officer, and the cost incurred for said abatement was Four Hundred Thirty-six Dollars and Forty-seven Cents ($436.47), including interest. I, Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, do hereby certify that the securing and closure of the property was done under the provisions of Chapter 17-300, and that the removal of trash and other prohibited items was done under the provisions of Chapter 13, and in accordance with the Order of the Abatement Hearing Officer. 1 I also certify that the costs and expenses incurred by the City for securing and closure of the property, and the removal of trash were One Thousand, Eight Hundred Sixty-seven Dollars and Eighty-nine Cents ($1,867.89), which amount the City Council has ordered assessed as a special tax against the following described property, to -wit: 16 North Henderson Avenue, Cape Girardeau, MO PT Lot 7 & PT Lot 8 Henderson SUBD PT O.L. 10, in the City and County of Cape Girardeau, Missouri the same being the sum fixed as costs by the report of the Building Supervisor and as costs incurred in the removal of trash from said property. This Special Tax Bill bears interest at the rate of eight per cent (80) per annum from sixty (60) days after its date and is a special lien against the land herein described. The lien hereof shall continue ten (10) years after the date of issue, unless sooner paid, and in the event suit is brought to enforce such lien, then until the expiration of such litigation. Issued by authority of Ordinance No. passed and adopted February 1, 2021. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, as City Clerk of the City of Girardeau, Missouri, I have hereunto set my hand under corporate seal of the said City this day of 2021. Gayle L. Conrad, City Clerk [S E A L] STATE OF MISSOURI ) ss. COUNTY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU ) Cape the On this day of , 2021, before me appeared Gayle L. Conrad, to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that she is the City Clerk of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the seal of said City, and that the said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said City by authority of its City Council, and acknowledged said instrument 4 to be the free act and deed of said City. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal, at my office in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, the day and year first above written. My commission expires: Notary Public 3 R-Vi--L f k-A-htV ' 2603 -Em. C � Cilkwtd., 7100 63301 Bill To City of Cape Girardeau gmww ice - Date Invoice # 10/23/2020 5075 P.O. No. Terms Project Quantity Description U/M Rate Amount 16 N. Henderson. Board up doors and windows for security purposes using 5/8 plywood and torx screws. Openings not reachable without ladders will be locked from interior. 36/38 N. Henderson. Secure building as described above 678.00 446.00 678.00 446.00 Total $1,124.00 /Z-Vi--L Pk-A- ztV ' 2603 -Em. C � Cilkwtd., 7100 63301 Bill To City of Cape Girardeau ' gmww ice - Date Invoice # 11/30/2020 5131 P.O. No. Terms Project Quantity Description U/M Rate Amount 1 36/38 N Henderson: Board up the remaining first floor windows 604.56 604.56 on both structures using plywood and torx screws 1 16 N Henderson: Board up the top windows on structures using 453.42 453.42 plywood and torx screws I Labor Secure building as described above 36/38 N. Henderson. 300.00 300.00 1 Labor Secure building as described above 16 N. Henderson. 300.00 300.00 Purchase Order# 210789 Total $1,657.98 Staff: Kelly Green P.E., City Engineer Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT An Ordinance to establish stop signs at the following locations: • Lochinvar Lane at Hopper Road • Lochinvar Lane at Hunze Drive • Collins Street at Hunze Drive • Hunze Drive at Collins Street/Lochinvar Lane • Castle Court at Lochinvar Lane • Esker Trail at Walden Boulevard • Heywood Meadows at Walden Boulevard • Business Park Place at LaSalle Avenue • Baldwin Road at LaSalle Avenue • Bloomfield Road at Minnesota Avenue by amending Traffic Schedule C of the City Code. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The newly developed Highlands at Hopper Crossing includes stop signs on Lochinvar Lane, Collins Street, Hunze Drive, and Castle Court. The newly developed Walden Park Phase 5 includes stop signs on Esker Trail and Heywood Meadows. City staff became aware of two other locations that needed Traffic Schedule C amendments. These are at the intersections of Business Park Place at LaSalle Avenue and Baldwin at LaSalle Avenue. A citizen requested a full time four way stop at the intersection of Minnesota Avenue and Bloomfield Road. The intersection currently operates as a two way stop along Minnesota Avenue, except during school hours when traffic along Bloomfield must stop as well. Due to the proximity to the school and for the purposes of continuity of traffic control, staff recommends amending the traffic schedule to include stop signs along Bloomfield at Minnesota Avenue at all times. Staff discussed this with Cape Girardeau Public School administrators who were in support of this amendment. All of these stop signs are to delineate traffic right-of-way. The attached ordinance establishes stop signs at the above mentioned locations. FINANCIAL IlVWACT Establishing the stop signs will require no direct funding. Public Works will install the stop signs along Bloomfield Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council amend Schedule C of the Traffic Ordinance as stated in the summary attachment as it relates to Lochinvar Lane, Collins Street, Hunze Drive, Castle Court, Esker Trail, Heywood Meadows, Business Park Place, Baldwin Road, and Bloomfield Road. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: AttendingaSch C-StopaSigns.doc Ordinance © Stop signs at Various Locations - Ord Info.docx Ord Information Highlands at Hopper Crossing_ Stop_ Sign Map_pdf Highlands at Hopper - Stop Sign Map © Walden Park 5 Stop Sign Map,pdf Walden Park 5 - Stop Sign Map U Business Park Place Stop_Sign.odf Business Park Place - Stop Sign Map © Baldwin Road at LaSalle Avenue Stop Sign.pdf Baldwin Road - Stop Sign Map U Bloomfield Road at Minnesota StopSigns.pdf Bllomfield Road - Stop Sign Map BILL NO. 21-12 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SCHEDULE C OF SECTION 26-121 OF THE CITY CODE, BY ADDING STOP SIGNS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, IN THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1. Schedule C of Section 26-121 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, is hereby amended by establishing stop signs, in the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, at the following locations: • Lochinvar Lane at Hopper Road, facing south. • Lochinvar Lane at Hunze Drive, facing west. • Collins Street at Hunze Drive, facing east. • Hunze Drive at Collins Street/Lochinvar Lane, facing south. • Castle Court at Lochinvar Lane, facing east. • Esker Trail at Walden Boulevard, facing east. • Heywood Meadows at Walden Boulevard, facing east. • Business Park Place at LaSalle Avenue, facing north. • Baldwin Road at LaSalle Avenue, facing south. • Bloomfield Road at Minnesota Avenue, facing east and west. ARTICLE 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten days after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2021. Bob Fox, Mayor ATTEST: Bruce Taylor, Deputy City Clerk 1 Traffic Schedule C — Stop Signs at Various Locations Ordinance Information Schedule C — Stop Signs [►1 Highlands at Hopper Crossing Lochinvar Lane at Hopper Road, facing south. Lochinvar Lane at Hunze Drive, facing west. Collins Street at Hunze Drive, facing east. Hunze Drive at Collins Street/Lochinvar Lane, facing south Castle Court at Lochinvar Lane, facing east Walden Park Phase 5 Esker Trail at Walden Boulevard, facing east. Heywood Meadows at Walden Boulevard, facing east. Others Business Park Place at LaSalle Avenue, facing north. Baldwin Road at LaSalle Avenue, facing south. Bloomfield Road at Minnesota Avenue, facing east and west. City of Cape Girardeau Traffic Schedule C Proposed Stop Signs: Lochinvar Lane at Hopper Road, facing south. Lochinvar Lane at Hunze Drive, facing west. Collins Street at Hunze Drive, facing east. Hunze Drive at Collins Street/Lochinvar Lane, facing south. Castle Cnnrt at l nchinvar l ane, facing Past. 1 1 12 \\ ��. � LOT 18 \LOT 11 yl LOT 5 1 LOT 11A ` \ LOT 19 t '1 LOT 6 LG Vc ,vo lo r r, r1 1 1yv, 1 � LOT 20 A \ LOT 10 11 i LOT LOT A E � I LOT F C e � GINNING T8OFLOT8 1 1 1 Y 1 LOT 26 1 LOT 25 �u iVe r�rnub v 'VG -D2786 I •1 1 1 , � l 1b oc7 sG.ET ,49,3SRE , ss, V LO. 5 `\ vL0120 1 1 1 1 u 31t ACRES � 0 37_acR� 0 B V � n inrv vv re,, VV 5Cr 2 VLVhV 1 LOT 24 C n LOT 27 12414SFT 5,249 SOT t Q �� �� �It C 1 c 1 t, ' 1 1 0 62 A RS LOT 21 35t ACRE ' 1C,GOC SO.Fr. �,5� 0.23EACR Es 1 U -T 50' i �O _RP— _ Lor 28 I `�1 13,729 SO FT. t LOT 22 ! 0.32 t ACRES I a _ ,g00o sa ET 0.23. ACR LS LDE�DFVc LOT ➢1 � 1 �� %� I cmc VVI nor o LOT 32 31 1 C E hoc iiV,5 C 1 C LOT 23 r� ; ! LOT 29 I 1 o,000 SO FC i ��•-1 _ 11 ` i LOT 30 0231ACRES t , '_ ,7,905SOF- B <i 1 041EACRES�1 W E B LOT 33 LOT 41 Proposed Stop Signs V,F V �eueLV� LOT 34 L �w, LOT 40 �Gr l'l nnV�F,. 1 _c LOT 35 L�_� - - S01 °11'20" E R FARM ' E (RNV 31') VACATED SANDY. D ALLEY R/W co I 5n 2 0 I O I ER F_ARM LE RIW 31' I I 1 I I 1\T� 1 � I ! nCD I � I � I C7 1 I UJ 0 L _ _ J =100.00' L 53.89' cr qD N: N73'10'15"E, 53,24'r VACATED KICKBALL . ALLEY R/W\, City of Cape Girardeau Traffic Schedule C Proposed Stop Signs: Esker Trail at Walden Boulevard, facing east. Heywood Meadows at Walden Boulevard, facing east. - / A 1 t LOT 29 \ 56� 9,740 SF o N1 e IN \ 0.22 ACRES \ �. ' / / \ LOT 30e N\� N61'28'35"E 9,475 SF L1 — Goi / \ 0.22 ACRES 33.96' L2 \ ` , / L=40.28'\ N84'58'39"E B LOT 3145.32' \ 51.9 1, 20.7 ' / •' \ F 9.464 SF \ w D \ 0,22 ACRES \ a r 50.75 39.33, //56 LOT 2 I 11,895 SF 8 9,620 S i I 0.27 ACRES \ �/ s1� E 6a4071'� C 0.22 ACR I IF N57.43'56"E / \ �� LOT 19 \ G 64.34' / \ �6,, 9,897 SF \ �c L I I / / 6 \\\ Q 0.23 ACRES 17.56' mss. / \ 4-- �� LOT 1$r- L� 9,401 SF 0.22 ACRES L=9.44' L — — — — 34.52' - �� S23'26'10"SLOT 17 \ A F i 12.00' 9,323 SF L8 0.21 ACRES \ so a 23 1c LOT B �01a 4,956 SF F �j ! i �s�e\5 ' �/ 26.91' _ 0.11 ACRES � F �c'Q F bK ` -�� LOT 16A 1 /L5 p 9,049 SF LOT A 0.21 ACRES 4,1 C12 c 6,235 SF F 0.14 ACRES D 0 is '— o WALDEN Bov C14' to �EVgR /p 0 T L Proposed Stop Sick RECORD OWNER A DEVELOPER OF SUBD AND PLAT PREPARED City of Cape Girardeau Traffic Schedule C Proposed Stop Sign at Business Park Place at LaSalle Avenue, facing north. N W+ E S Proposed Stop Sign City of Cape Girardeau Traffic Schedule C Proposed Stop Sign at Baldwin Road at LaSalle Avenue, facing south. LASALLE WINTERFIELD 2 D � J m N W +E S Proposed Stop Sign SUMMERFIELD City of Cape Girardeau Traffic Schedule C Proposed Stop Signs at Bloomfield Road at Minnesota Avenue, facing east and west. Q 0 w Z J • BLOOMFIELD Q O W Z N w r r S Proposed Stop Signs Staff: Kelly Green P.E., City Engineer Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT An Ordinance to establish no parking anytime at the following locations: • Lochinvar Lane • Castle Court • Esker Trail • Heywood Meadows by amending Traffic Schedule F of the City Code. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The newly developed Highlands at Hopper Crossing includes parking restrictions along the east side of Lochinvar Lane and the south side of Castle Court due to pavement width restrictions. Staff proposes to establish no parking anytime along the east side of Lochinvar Lane from Hopper Road to Hunze Drive and the south side of Castle Court. The newly developed Walden Park Phase 5 includes parking restrictions along the north side of Esker Trail and the south side of Heywood Meadows due to pavement width restrictions. Staff proposes to establish no parking anytime along the north side of Esker Trail and the south side of Heywood Meadows. FINANCIAL IMPACT Establishing the no parking anytime will require no direct funding. The subdivision developers installed the signs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council amend Schedule F of the Traffic Ordinance as stated in the summary attachment as it relates to Lochinvar Lane, Castle Court, Esker Trail, and Heywood Meadows. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: © Amending Schedule F No Parkine doc Ordinance No Parking Anytime_ at various Locations - Ord Info.docx Ord Info Hi hg ]ands at Hopper Crossing No Parking Map.pdf Highlands at Hopper - No Parking Map U Walden Park 5 No Parking�Map.pdf Walden Park 5 - No Parking Map BILL NO. 21-13 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SCHEDULE F OF SECTION 26-247 OF THE CITY CODE, BY ESTABLISHING NO PARKING ANYTIME AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, IN THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1. Schedule F of Section 26-247 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, is hereby amended by establishing no parking anytime at the following locations: Lochinvar Lane, east side, from Hunze Drive to Hopper Road. Castle Court, south side. Esker Trail, north side, from Walden Boulevard to Heywood Meadows. Heywood Meadows, south side, from Walden Boulevard to Esker Trail. ARTICLE 2. It is the intention of the governing body and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and the sections of this Code may be renumbered to accomplish such intention. ARTICLE 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after ten days after its final passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF Bob Fox, Mayor nruce Taylor, uepuLy �,iLy �-lerx 1 2021. Traffic Schedule F — No parking anytime at Various locations Ordinance Information Schedule F — No parking anytime New Highlands at Hopper Crossing Lochinvar Lane, east side, from Hunze Drive to Hopper Road. Castle Court, south side. Walden Park Phase 5 Esker Trail, north side, from Walden Boulevard to Heywood Meadows. Heywood Meadows, south side, from Walden Boulevard to Esker Trail. City of Cape Girardeau Traffic Schedule F Proposed No Parking Anytime: Lochinvar Lane, east side, from Hunze Drive to Hopper Road and Castle Court, south side LOT 12 ' \ \ \ . \ LOT 18 11 I LOT 5 '777- M/1, -A� LOT 1'I LOT 19 1NVrlIrl--17 5 li 0-G N LOT 6 7�77 LOT 20 LOT 10 LOT 7 5 LOT A E F g i c LOT 9 EGINNING .OT 8 OF 9-02780 LOT 8 LOT 25 LOT 26 I 6,DD7 UX NO 14 91A SQ F1 RE�, 0.34 -ACRES 037, AS LOT 24 c LOT 27 c LO E A 12 41 A SC FT 15 219 SQ T n�s, ZRLS T 21 1 ACRES 10 ,000 SQ 0 2�±ACRLS A 50' RIW 4 LOT 28 co - 13 729 SQ L I LOT 22 ' — I 032, ACRES F 0 23± ACRLSA rooms t5 n, -01-rA�IY, LLC UL, NO �w 5rd—F FU x NO LOT 32 LOT 31 A 011f" I L4 23 c E C LOT 29 021 ig0c0 SQFT LOT 30 0 23t ACH LS C 17B,9C6 Sr FT B 0 41 ACF Ell I w E F L07-,:' LOT 33 LOT 41 � ---------- ...... f)corr A 5/g,rc,r eo Proposed No Parking I'Pr 1,110 OEV�rlll- LOT 34 LOT 40 L) ........... G .M. A9NchRRi D,, ;onI, rG 00! City of Cape Girardeau Traffic Schedule F Proposed No Parking Anytime: Esker Trail, north side, from Walden Boulevard to Heywood Meadows and Heywood Meadows, south side, from Walden Boulevard to Esker Trail N 10 VoG- RI WEST PARTN RS LC LOT F DO NO. 2006-0 977 N/F / 107' `-� / RIVERWEST PARTNERS LC Ing / \ LOT 39 L09' 40 Ca DOC. N0. 2006-16676 / \ 51.37' E _ \ LOT 41 LOT H RIVERWE TNPARTNERS LC DOC. N 2006-08977 \ N71'I1'10'E `Eiya=aF ��. C2 4,354 SF �f 8833' C3 .10 ACRES �A9 2 _ \ LOT 36 .v LO"1' 1 `+ �1 3v e ss \ 9.333 SF„ � 4 LOT 43 9� w �p i j o �4.F - S6 / I/ _ A I K"i - _ a \ LOT 37 �+ [ 8 8,376 SF \ s .\<• 0.19 ACRES .o \ \ LOT 36 y \ G i v D o.zz9ncaEs d< \1 LOT 35 -a \ F� \\� /�E c' Qi 31�� � // LOT 26 � � s• � y, G 8,483 SF (�,,�1/ !� C/ 0.19 ACRES \ �/!! ?6 191'20' 1 .oy \ 1�LOT 34 \ ^' \ i 3,-- �f p�cj cti°�.i ,Vl 8.835 SF a \ A'\ 1 1 o.zo ACRES VACATED SAVOY YH) D ALLY R/w LOT 33 �, L-zo A SF � 3 li ae3 SF 1�-g, 0 �. A ` _ _ o is ACRES Y 0.27 ACRES F _ \ \� 2 / -�\ LOT 27 a n/ , �/� Sss \ l C� j �.ai \ G 9.828 SF B \ ��Sg.. F C,aa' / 0.23 ACRES -21.2I L0 24 LOT 28 10.19 SFB \z 0194ACRES F 0.23 RES f LOT 23 \ ; 777. 0.22 ACRES \'\\ 8,550 5F LOT 30 a \ 0.20 ACRES 9.475 SF \\ Ns^ es3as A /rye l LOT 22 �v 9aa, p Edi LL -40.2b' 0.22 ACRES \ / �\ \� 9.139 SF \ pb / L1 \ ` % / S 585d� ti'h. a,9 i \ ! 0.21 ACRES \ `.a as �f' F C7 L2 / - A Naa 343,3 L V sa4. � LOT 31 \ F 8.484 SF \(uZ- i . 9 �� \ 0.22 ACRES \ o `i vy �- - _ sc. --i� \ p LOT 21 \\ . / /��\ 1 i 6 - \ �, FtP� _ LOT Y U'- 9,246 SF \V ' i Q^��. „ / 143 A SF 0.21 ACRES \ \'�'JF�eC �j�F' 3AB 0.8, ACRES STOR DETENTION LOT 32 \ .� // ,;y \\ LOT sF \ '4.. i > 5 a ` aq i d; BASIN �/ \i 11895 SF B 1 i/�� E"` vg"5 C m. 0.22 ACRES i v ti a A 10 27 ACRES 1 G/ e 4 00 ��� i Vi'• 5 9 ` D F Nb 6n�4i•E i -J \ ':z LOT 19 II I 9.897 SF FLOT 12A \ / 0.23 ACRES �. \ 10,617 SF /5 k5 LOT 'S'F 8 0.24 ACRES \ II% / 6. a9y .y YJ i � \ 9.401 SF 1o'.t,u L h38- i 0.22 ACRES _ ills�h N �,G15"F. 5 L4 '�L 1'.41' \\ o /` V �4'i - L j. Y VACATED KICKBALL _ S2 '10"SLOT 17 \ p q F i 5a. 6 �y 2 -� \j i - \ LOT 13A \ o _ �� / i ALLEYR/W •2,70' 9,323 SF \ �� �� 9,736 SF V� CORNER �L0.21 ACRES vv las'L=Is.S.i' A o.zz ACRES \ A/gnl vv DOC. o . a1�>: `� _ -� ze.I6 i LOT 14A 4,958 SF F - �� ^5 �'2�.'I 1 �._. \ 8,886 9F \0.11 ACRES F j !,A �� /\�\� -{ A 0.21 ACRES\ ! - p. �Isss'�- (G �' LOT 1 A G 7,762 F 4�Id.3oJ 1 y' 0.18 A E"V L5 LOT 1SF ���° �yOo LOT 12 - \ 9,049 SF LOT A o.21 ACRES 1 "- p N' C12 �� 8 235 SF F 0.14 ACRES .0 - N fig, p V - INE HILL SPUR LOT 11 _ 6 A252aE , , NIF O Q W. C14 \ 7 -_ Q TUS DEVEELOPNENT LLC i W E gotj-----___DOC. NO. 2011-00126 � 1 Proposed No Parking O20' MINIMUM K (717-C Lr ) B 15' REAR SETBACK ( ICAL). C 5' SIDE SETBACK AN NEW 5' SEWER & UTILITY C3 IF Staff: Bruce Taylor, Deputy City Clerk Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT Appointment of two members to the Tree Board for unexpired terms set to expire February 1, 2024. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Laura Klipfel and Jennifer Behnken have terms expiring February 1, 2021. Laura Klipfel has served on the Tree Board since 2017 and Jennifer Behnken has served on the Tree Board since 2016. Each have expressed interest in being reappointed. A copy of the roster is attached for your information. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Tree Board is comprised of the Public Works Director, Parks and Recreation Director, one member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, and four residents of Cape Girardeau selected by the City Council. Members serve a three-year term. The following individuals have expressed interest in serving on this Board, and their advisory board summary sheets are attached. Applicant Ward Citizen Academy Graduate Jennifer Behnken 4 no Lea Bohr 1 no Michelle Clements 3 no Christopher Haug 1 no Laura Klipfel 4 no Georgia Cookie Little 4 no Ron McAdams 5 no Ivy Shen 5 no GENERAL DIRECTION Unless directed otherwise, two appointments to the Tree Board will appear on a future City Council agenda for consideration. Name: I Description: ❑ roster attendance.tree.pdf Tree Board Attendance Roster ❑ tree roster.doc Tree Board Roster ❑ Behnken Jennifer.01-08-21.pdf Behnken, Jennifer ❑ Bohr.Lea.12-22-2020.pdf Bohr, lea ❑ Clements.Michelle.12-16-20.pdf Clements, Michelle ❑ Haug Christopher.l0-16-2020.pdf Haug, Christopher ❑ Klipfel.Laum.01-15-21.pdf Klipfel, Laura ❑ Little.Georgia.10-03-20.pdf Little, Georgia "Cookie" ❑ McAdans.Ron.09-10-20.ndf McAdams, Ron ❑ Shen.Ivy.05-13-20.pdf Shen, Ivy TREE BOARD Attendance Record Ordinance effective 4/13/00 X = present, A = absent Board meets bi-monthly beginning in February 2021 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1st 2nd Bi-Monthly, 2nd Monday 8 12 14 9 11 13 letter letter 3rd termi- letter appt'ed nated Behnken, Jennifer 07/05/16 Harris, Robert 08/21/17 Klipfel, Laura 08/27/19 03/04/20 10/18/17 Svenson, Sven Parks and Rec Appointee P Evans, Beverly F11/02/18 07/05/16 2020 Jan Bi-Monthly, 2nd Monday Feb 10 Mar Apr 13 May Jun 8 Jul Aug Sep 10 Oct Nov Dec 1st 2nd 12 14 letter letter 3rd termi- letter appt'ed nated Behnken, Jennifer P P P A 07/05/16 Harris, Robert P A P P 08/21/17 Klipfel, Laura A c P A P 08/27/19 03/04/20 10/18/17 Svenson, Sven P P P P7-1 Parks and Rec Appointee Evans, Beverly I I P I I I I P I I A I I P I I I 1 1 111/02/181 CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI Roster of Advisory Boards and Committees January 8, 2021 All members of Advisory boards must be residents of the City of Cape Girardeau unless otherwise noted. Members may serve for only three consecutive full terms on the same board or commission effective with terms commencing January 8, 1996. Beverly Evans, Parks & Rec Brd Appointee Laura Klipfel Jennifer Behnken Stan Polivick, Public Works Dir Robert Harris Sven Svenson Julia Jones, Parks & Rec Dir Tree Board Date Appointed November 2, 2018 September 18, 2017 July 5, 2016 August 21, 2017 February 1, 2016 Date Reannointed 1/22/18 1/22/18 1/22/19 1/22/19 Term Expires (P&R Term Expires) February 1, 2021 February 1, 2021 February 1, 2022 February 1, 2022 Serve three year terms, appointed by City Council. Meetings held second Monday, bi-monthy beginning in February, at noon at the Osage Community Centre. Study, investigate, counsel and develop and/or update annually, and administer a written plan for the care, preservation, pruning, planting, replanting, removal or disposition of public trees in parks, along streets and in other public places. Upon request by City Council, shall consider, investigate, make findings, report and recommend upon any special matter of question coming within the scope of its work. (Two Members added per Ord. 4516, 11/18/13) Staff contact —Julia Jones, Parks and Recreation Director, 339-6340. Staff: Bruce Taylor, Deputy City Clerk Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT Appointment of one member to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for a term expiring October 29, 2022. Nicholas Snyder was serving a term on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board set to expire October 29, 2022. Due to moving out of the City Limits, Mr. Snyder submitted his resignation from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board effective January 8, 2021. A copy of the roster is attached for your review. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Section 18-27 of the City Code states that a person appointed to the board shall be a taxpayer, qualified voter and resident of the city. The following individuals have expressed an interest in serving on the board, and their board applications are attached. Applicant Ward Citizen Academy Graduate Lea Bohr 1 no Michelle Clements 3 no Shannon Hagan 4 yes Christopher Haug 1 no Georgia "Cookie" Little 4 no Ron McAdams 5 no Josh Parham 5 no Whitney Quick 4 no Ivy Shen 5 no Kevin Timlin 3 no Kent Ward 4 no GENERAL DIRECTION Unless directed otherwise, four appointments to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for terms expiring October 29, 2022 will appear on a future agenda for consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: U Bohrlea.12-22-2020.ndf Bohr, Lea © C1ements.MichLHe.12-16r20.pdf Gement, Michelle ® Haean.Shannon.03-03-20.12df Hagan, Shannon ❑ Haug Christopher.10-16-2020.pdf Haug, Christopher ❑ Little.Georgia.l0-03-20.pdf Little, Georgia "Cookie" ❑ McAdams.Ron.09-10-20.pdf McAdams, Ron ❑ ParhamJosh.03-0420.pdf Parham, Josh ❑ Ouick.Whitney.02-22-20.pdf Quick, Whitney ❑ Shen.Ivy.05-13-20.12df Shen, Ivy ❑ Timlin.Kevin.12-16-2020.pdf Timlin, Ke\in ❑ Ward.Kent.0112420.pdf Ward, Kent ❑ roster attendance.parkpdf Parks and Recreation Board Attendance Roster ❑ Parks and Rec Roster.docx Parks and Recreation Board Roster PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Attendance Record Ordinance effective 4/13/00 P = present, A = absent 2021 2nd Monday Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1st 2nd 11 8 8 12 10 14 12 9 13 11 8 13 letter letter 3rd letter appt'ed termi- nated Cantrell, David 9/15/2020 Aug 10 05/15/17 Oct 12 Dohogne, Ann Dec 14 02/22/19 Evans, Beverly termi- nated Cantrell, David 05/21/18 P Frazier, Pete 1/6/2021 A 03/21/16 P Glenn, Tracey 9/15/2020 P 10/17/16 9/15/2020 Harville, Meghan Dohogne, Ann Evans, Beverly 11/16/20 P P Hudson, Rodger AP A A P P P P A LaBruyere, Bradley 10/22/2020 P P 10/15/18 Noel, Kevin 12/28/2017 Frazier, Pete P P Snider, Nick 8/11/2020 P P A Stilson, Ken P P 05/15/17 2020 2nd Monday Jan 13 Feb 10 Mar 9 Apr May 13 11 Jun 8 Jul 13 Aug 10 Sep 14 Oct 12 Nov 9 Dec 14 1st 2nd letter letter 3rd letter appt'ed termi- nated Cantrell, David P P A C P A P P A P P P 9/15/2020 05/15/17 Dohogne, Ann Evans, Beverly P P P P P P AP A A P P P P A P P A P P P P P 05/21/18 02/22/19 Frazier, Pete P P P P P P A P P P A 03/21/16 Glenn, Tracey A P P C P P P A A P P P 9/15/2020 10/17/16 Harville, Meghan Ap1winted November 16, 2020 P 11/16/20 Hudson, Rodger P P P P P P P P P P P Knudtson, Gunnar P P A A P P P A A nated-atten 9/15/2020 10/15/18 10/14/20 LaBruyere, Bradley P P A L P P P P A A P P 10/22/2020 10/15/18 Noel, Kevin P P P P P P P A P P P 12/28/2017 Snider, Nick P P M P P A A 7 P P P P 8/11/2020 Stilson, Ken I P P I P I P I P I P P I P A P P 05/15/17 CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI Roster of Advisory Boards and Committees January 8, 2021 All members of Advisory boards must be residents of the City of Cape Girardeau unless otherwise noted. Members may serve for only three consecutive full terms on the same board or commission effective with terms commencing May 8, 1996. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Vacant Tracey Glenn Date Appointed Council, ex -officio March 15, 2017 Roger Hudson October 15, 2012 Meghan Harville November 16, 2020 Bradley LaBruyere October 15, 2018 Anne Dohogne September 4, 2018 Vacant Tracey Glenn October 17, 2016 Ken Stilson March 15, 2017 David Cantrell March 15, 2017 Beverly Evans (Tree Board Liaison) May 21, 2018 Kevin Noel September 14, 2015 Pete Frazier March 21, 2016 Date Reappointed 11/16/15; 10/15/18 10/15/18; 4/16/19 10/16/19 10/16/19 10/16/19 10/19/20 10/16/17;10/19/20 10/16/17; 10/19/20 Term Expires October 29, 2021 October 29, 2021 October 29, 2021 October 29, 2021 October 29, 2022 October 29, 2022 October 29, 2022 October 29, 2022 October 29, 2023 October 29, 2023 October 29, 2023 Serve three year terms, appointed by Council. Regular meetings held second Monday at 5:30 p.m. in Osage Centre. A Council member may serve as liaison. Staff contact — Julia Jones, Parks & Recreation Director 339-6340. Staff: Agenda: 1/19/2021 SUBJECT Advisory Board Minutes Airport Advisory Board Minutes, December 8, 2020 Parks and Recreation Board Minutes, December 14, 2020 ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: D AuportBoard-Minutes 12-8-2020 (2).pdf Airport Advisory Board Minutes D PR AdvisoryMinutes 12.14.20 (31.pdf Parks and Recreation Board Minutes CITY 'F CAPE GIRARDEAU REGIONAL AIRPORT - CGI Cape Girardeau Regional Airport Advisory Board Meeting - Minutes December 8, 2020 The Cape Girardeau Regional Airport Advisory Board held their regular meeting on December 8, 2020, 11:30am Via -Zoom. Board Members Present: Ryan Dewrock, Chairman Mark Welker, Vice Chairman Mark Seesing, Board Member Joe Uzoaru, Board Member Justin Davidson, Board Member Beverly Cleair, Board Member Mike Marshall, Board Member Jeff Brune, Board Member Absent: Richard Knote Call to Order/Approval of Minutes Staff Present: Katrina Amos, Airport Manager Stacy Kinder, Council Liaison Derrick Irwin, Flight Line Manager Audrey Lorch, Airport Support Spec. The meeting was called to order at 11:36am. Mr. Seesing moved and Ms. Cleair seconded the motion to approve the minutes from the October 8, 2020 minutes. The motion was approved by unanimous vote. II. Appearances—Jeff Long, Southeast Missourian news Reporter III. Old Business A. Airport Activity Report —Due to the November 2020 meeting being canceled, Ms. Amos presented the October and November Airport Usage Reports. Enplanements continue to trend low and are in line with industry trends due to COVID. While this trend is expected to continue for the next few months, she discussed that once the vaccine becomes available we hope to see an upward trend in travel. Ms. Amos noted the Essential Air Service contract will be eligible for re -bid mid - 2021. As of now, she doesn't anticipate any change to this process but plans to reach out to US DOT to confirm. Discussion continued on this topic. B. Cape Aviation Report — Mr. Irwin reported fuel sales are down 26% for the month, but on trend with other airports in the region. Ms. Amos and Mr. Irwin plan to revisit the marketing campaign that was developed prior to COVID to promote the FBO and its services. More discussions continued on this topic. C. Projects - Terminal Area Master Plan (TAMP) — Ms. Amos reported at this time there is not a lot of movement since our last meeting in October. Our planning consultants with Crawford, Murphy, & Tilly are finalizing the remaining chapters to be presented to the FAA. It is hoped to have this information submitted for review by the end of the year. SEMO Pilot Program - Ms. Amos reported the press conference announcing SEMO's new pilot program was very successful and well attended. She thanked Board Members for their attendance and support. She discussed how working with the SEMO University and US Aviation has been a wonderful experience and she looks forward to a great partnership. US Aviation out of Denton Texas was very impressed with our community. Ms. Amos has been working with US Aviation on a lease agreement for hangar and office space located in Hangar 71, which she hopes to present to Council around the first of the year. More discussion continued on this topic. Restaurant Lease Update — Ms. Amos noted that the new restaurant is still under construction due to weather and contractor delays. Sandy's Place hopes to be in the new restaurant by the first of the year. Ms. Amos is working with city management and pursuing other options before making a new lease decision; there are many repairs and updates needed prior to accepting a new tenant at this time. IV. New Business - A. Managers' Report - Trip to SHD Airport and JYO Remote Control Tower - Ms. Amos recently visited Shenandoah Valley Regional Airport and Leesburg Executive Airport in Virginia, along with CMT, to tour these airports and their support facilities. This was an exploratory trip to gather ideas and information to help with completing the Terminal Area Master Plan. Ms. Amos reported she gained a lot of insight not just from the overall layout of their passenger terminal facilities, but also with regards to their FBO and maintenance facilities. From the efficiency of their personnel, uniformity of facilities, to overall management of the operation, Ms. Amos was very impressed and hopeful that she can incorporate some of what she learned at CGI. B. ATCT update -Ms. Amos announced we now have a fourth Air Traffic Controller. Mr. Justin Huffman of Sikeston Missouri has been hired full time. He was previously employed by Midwest ATC, a contract tower in Carbondale, IL. C. Part 139 — Live Exercise Update - Ms. Amos explained now that CGI is an FAA Part 139 Class 1 airport, we are now required to have a live exercise every three (3) years. On October 28, 2020, CGI conducted this exercise along with participating organizations listed in the Airport Emergency Plan. This exercise is to give airport staff and emergency responders live experience of how to handle an aircraft event if it were to happen at CGI. While the exercise scenario was very simple, there was a lot of positive feedback on how well the event was executed. There were few things mentioned to correct and build upon for next time but overall it was a successful exercise. More discussions on this topic. V. Non -Agenda — A. Airport Rebranding - Ms. Amos has informed the Board that we have selected Rust Media to assist with the airport's rebranding and new website. Ms. Amos feels this is the perfect opportunity to begin this process in light of all of the projects, including new airport terminal, scheduled to begin in the next couple years. Ms. Amos would like to form a small committee to be involved in the rebranding project. She asked members of the Board if they are interested in joining the committee to send her email stating that. B. Advisory Board Presentation - Ms. Amos reported City Council would like for advisory boards to give presentations to better inform citizens of each board's role and the projects they assist City staff with. Advisory Board spotlights will begin January 2021, with the Airport Advisory Board is scheduled to present in April. Ms. Amos asked Board Chair Ryan Dewrock if he would be willing to give the presentation, to which he agreed. VI. Adjournment - There being no other business Mr. Seesing moved to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Uzoaru seconded the motion. All were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 12:15pm. Minutes prepared by: Audrey Lorch Airport Support Specialist CITY Of CAPE GIRARDEAU DRAFT PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Minutes Monday, December 14, 2020 The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board held their regular meeting on December 14, 2020, at 5:30p.m. at the Osage Centre. Board Members Present: Kevin Noel, Chairman Roger Hudson, Vice Chairman David Cantrell, Board Member Beverly Evans, Board Member Tracey Glenn, Board Member Nicholas Snyder, Board Member Kenneth Stilson, Board Member Anne Dohogne, Board Member Brad Labruyere, Board Member Meghan Harville, Board Member Absent: Pete Frazier, Board Member Daniel Presson, Council Liaison Others Present: Percy Huston Staff Present: Julia Jones, Parks & Recreation Director Brock Davis, Parks Division Manager Scott Williams, Recreation Division Manager Penny Williams, Recreation Division Manager Diane Boyer, Administrative Assistant 1. WELCOME / INTRODUCTIONS A. Chairman Noel called the meeting to order and welcomed everyone. He introduced our new Board Member, Meghan Harville. B. City Manager, Scott Meyer, thanked the board for their service. City Attorney, Eric Cunningham, conducted the Non-Harrassment/Non-Discrimination Policy Presentation and the Sunshine Law and Ethics Presentation. 2. OLD BUSINESS A. Approval Of Minutes Kevin Noel asked for a motion to approve the November 9, 2020, minutes. Tracey Glenn made a Motion; seconded by Roger Hudson to approve the minutes. Motion passed with no one opposed. B. Aquatics Update With the repairs complete, Director Jones reported Central Pool has re -opened with no major issues. The Jefferson School Project is getting closer to final plans and cost estimate. PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD DECEMBER 14, 2020 PAGE 2 C. Spaghetti Day Recap Recreation Division Manager Scott Williams conveyed the event went very well. He should have the financials soon and be able to report them at the January board meeting. 3. NEW BUSINESS A. Parks and Recreation Operational Budget Discussion Director Jones stated the Parks & Recreation Staff is getting ready to prepare operational budgets. Since minimum wage is set to increase in January, she asked the board to think of alternative ways to make increases in order for the department to break even and cover those expenses. She would like the board to discuss these options at the January board meeting. 4. REPORTS A. Parks and Recreation Project Updates Parks Division Manager Davis reported they will be meeting Wednesday with Bowen Engineering and Strickland Engineering on the Capaha Park Master Plan. He has been in contact with Planning Design Studio and Public Works. Improvements to the River Heritage Museum will begin soon. B. Golf Course Advisory Board Parks Division Manager Davis and Recreation Division Manager Penny Williams reported there are no new updates but they are reviewing fee changes. Director Jones congratulated the golf course for having a record year. C. Tree Advisory Board Dr. Evans reported the Tree Advisory Board did not meet today. D. Red House Interpretive Center Committee Director Jones reported they had the December Committee Meeting by Zoom. They will regroup and meet again January 7, 2021. E. Parks and Recreation Foundation 1. Foundation Membership 2021 Campaign Recreation Division Manager Scott Williams reported the 2021 Membership Campaign is underway. It was launched at Spaghetti Day in November. The subcommittee will meet in early January. 2. Breakfast With Santa Recreation Division Manager Penny Williams reported this event was held December 12th. Safety precautions were in place and everything went very well. Special thanks to Notre Dame Basketball, Jackson Junior High and American Family Insurance for all their help with the event. 3. Celebration of Youth Sports Awards Banquet Recreation Division Manager Scott Williams reported this event will be held January 22nd. Nomination letters are being signed and will be mailed. The planning committee has begun discussing how the layout will look this year with safety precautions in place. 4. St. Louis Cardinals Calendar Recreation Division Manager Penny Williams reported we will not be selling the calendars this year and the Cardinals have cancelled the Cardinal Caravan. PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD DECEMBER 14, 2020 PAGE 3 Council Report Councilman Liaison Dan Presson was unable to attend but sent a report via email reporting that the Council is putting final touches on the recruitment materials for the new City Manager. Councilman Presson is working with the city to remove the two remaining buildings on the Red Star Flood Buyout Property. Director Jones announced we have an opportunity through the Foundation to acquire some property. One section is adjacent to the Red Star area; the other is a small section below the River Heritage Museum across from City Hall. They are contemplating the legal aspects and plan to make a decision within the next few weeks. G. Monthly Staff Report/Calendar Update Staff briefs were handed out to board members informing them of the upcoming events and projects in the Parks and Recreation Department. Recreation Division Manager Penny Williams recognized the sponsors for Winter Wonderland: Ameren, Culver's, Dominos, Elias Ace Hardware and The Bank of Missouri. They provided much of the funding for the Christmas lighting at Cape Splash. H. Other Items Director Jones would like Meghan to begin reporting to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board the activities from the monthly Keep Cape Beautiful Committee meetings. 5. OTHER BUSINESS A. Next Board Meeting The next board meeting is scheduled for Monday, January 11, 2021, at the Osage Centre. 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no other business to come before the board, Tracey Glenn made a motion to adjourn the meeting; seconded by Dr. Evans. Motion passed with no one opposed. The meeting was adjourned. Submitted by: Kenneth Stilson, Secretary