HomeMy WebLinkAboutCIP1993-1998CAPITAL
It
CITY OF
CAPE GIRARDEAU
MISSOURI
BILL NO. 93-53
RESOLUTION NO. �0 7
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL 1993 - 1998
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Article VI, Section 6.04 of the Charter of the City
of Cape Girardeau requires a Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has presented a proposed Capital
Improvement Program to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, proper notice has been published concerning the
availability for inspection of the proposed Capital Improvement
Program and the time and place for a public hearing on the Capital
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on the
proposed Capital Improvement Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
ARTICLE 1. The City Council hereby adopts the five-year
Capital Improvement Program for fiscal 1993-1998, copies of which
are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
ARTICLE 2. The City Clerk is instructed to attach an executed
copy of this resolution to a copy of the Capital Improvement
Program for fiscal 1993-1998 and to retain such copy with the
permanent records of the City. /
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS %h DAY OF _ti��CJ�.A� , 19r-3'
ATTEST:
20d(17
i
Gayl, L. Conrad
Deputy City Clerk
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGES
Introduction:
City Manager's Letter I
Revenue Sources VI
Summaries:
Revenue Funding Sources By Fiscal Year Graph VII
Summary of Funding Sources By Fiscal Year 1993-1998 VIII
Summary of Recommended Capital Improvement Program
Expenditures 1993-1998 by Program Description and
Source of Funds IX
Summary of Funding Sources Graph X
Capital Improvement Budget By Program Area Graph XI
Capital Imrpovements Program:
Transportation 1 - 22
Environment 23 - 54
Recreation and Leisure 55 - 62
Community Development 63 - 66
Unfunded Needs List 67 - 68
March 15, 1993
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Cape Girardeau
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
INTRODUCTION
In accordance with Article VI, Section 6.04 of the City Charter,
a recommended five year capital program was submitted to the
City Council. This five year plan is for the period July 1,
1993, through June 30, 1998. In March, in accordance with the
City Charter, the City Council held a public hearing for the
Capital Improvement Program. Following public input, the City
Council passed a resolution adopting the Capital Improvement
Program.
The material contained within the budget document complies with
the requirements of the Charter as to program proposals, cost
estimates, methods of financing, projection of revenue sources
to meet costs, recommended time schedule for each improvement,
and any anticipated impact on the annual operating budget.
In reviewing this adopted document, the City Council gave
particular emphasis to establishing priorities for projects and
realistic financing sources for implementation. While the
projects included herein are attainable through available
revenue sources, a number of these depend on the cooperation of
property owners and other agencies. Projects for which a
reliable funding source is not currently available without voter
authorization are included under the Unfunded Needs Section.
Each of the major advisory boards to the City Council and
department heads were invited to submit proposed projects for
consideration in this program. In addition, a number of
projects from the previous five-year capital improvement program
are also included.
BACKGROUND
The Capital Improvement Program should be considered as an
investment in the future of our community. The_ selection and
evalua ion of capital projects is a difficult task that involves
some speculation and the ability to make estimations which, to
some extent, are based on historical perspectives.
00
The City Council, in 1983, formally considered and adopted a
long range Capital Improvement Program for the first time under
the current Charter requirement. This budget document process
should provide a relevant approach to identifying and
implementing important community -wide projects.
PROGRAM AND FINANCING DESCRIPTIONS
The major category program areas in which the various projects
have been described include Transportation, Environment,
Recreation and Leisure Time, and Community Development. These
major categories contain the following types of projects:
1. Transportation. The activities in this area provide for
the construction of the public streets within the City and
Municipal Airport improvements.
2. Environment. The preservation, restoration, and care of
the physical resources of the City, including the control
of solid waste, wastewater, and stormwater.
3. Recreation and Leisure Time. The programs under this area
provide the facilities for citizens to enjoy an
opportunity to participate in organized and unorganized
leisure time activities.
4. Community Development. Activities under this area include
construction of general public facilities and community
projects which have citywide effect.
We have included the types of revenue sources which are
recommended as ways to consider for the financing of the various
capital improvements. The following is a brief discussion of
what the various revenue sources include.
A. General Fund Revenues. These revenues would be included
and available on an annual appropriation basis from the
City's general fund, which includes the receipt of
revenues from many and various sources.
B. General Obligation Bonds. These bonds are issued for the
financing of general public improvements and must be
authorized by a 4/7 majority vote of the citizens.
Approval of these bonds by the electorate also authorizes
a property tax levy to retire the debt.
II
C. Revenue/PFA Bonds. These bonds are issued for the
financing of self-supporting and general public
improvements. Revenue bonds are not included within the
limitations of indebtedness by the City and are issued
upon the authorization of a majority voter approval.
These bonds are used for enterprise funds such -as water,
sewer and electric utilities, as well as the Airport and
Golf Course operations. PFA Bonds are issued upon City
Council approval based on collateralized assets and annual
lease/purchase appropriations. Cash flows for debt
retirement come from the existing revenue and from new
receipts to be generated by the facilities' operations.
D. State Grants. The City is eligible to submit grant
applications to the State of Missouri for funds that they
may have available either from their own revenue sources
or, in some cases, from revenue sources that they
administer for various federal agencies.
E. Motor Fuel Tax Receipts. This fund provides for the
receipt and disbursement of the revenues the City receives
as its portion of the State Gasoline Tax, State Motor
Vehicle Licensing, and State Motor Vehicle Sales Tax. The
revenues from this source can be used for capital, as well
as annual operating maintenance expenses as they relate to
improvements on the City's streets.
F. Federal Grants. The City is eligible to receive various
federal grants on a competitive basis from the appropriate
federal agency. This could include the Environmental
Protection Agency as it relates to wastewater
improvements, the Federal Highway Administration which
administers and distributes funds from the Federal
Gasoline Tax revenue through the Federal Aid Urban
program, or the Federal Aviation Administration for
airport improvements.
G. Special Assessments. This category provides for the
consideration of special assessments which are used for
public improvements affecting specific areas. The total
or a portion of the cost of an improvement is divided
among property owners who benefit from the project. This
type of funding can be used for diverse improvements
including streets, storm water, sanitary sewer or sidewalk
improvement.
H. Capital Improvement Sales Tax. A 1/4 cent, 3/8 cent, or
1/2 cent Sales Tax can be issued by the City for various
general types of public improvements. Such a tax requires
the approval by the electorate with simple majority. In
November, 1988, the voters of Cape Girardeau adopted a
1/4 cent sales tax effective January 1, 1990, restricted
to flood control projects.
III
I. Other. This category is used for donations, operating
revenues from funds other than the General Fund, reserves,
proceeds from the sale of fixed assets, etc.
IMPROVEMENTS
The total Capital Improvement Program included here is
$26,852,040.
The largest category for funding proposed improvements over the
next five years is through Revenue Bonds. This provides for
$8,658,100.00 in funding over this period of time.
The second largest source of funding for proposed improvements
is through the use of Capital Improvement Sales Tax
($4,537,500). This revenue source would be utilized totally for
flood control improvements.
The third largest funding source is the Motor Fuel Tax
($3,780,660), which will be used entirely for street projects.
The largest program area is Environment ($12,194,900). The most
significant projects in this area are the funding of the Corps
of Engineers Flood Control on Cape La Croix Creek -Walker
Branch and the construction of sanitary sewer mains. Water
system improvements are also a key part of this area for the
first time.
The Transportation Program area ($8,702,140) contains the second
largest amount of adopted expenditures over the next five year
period. This is due primarily to the continuing construction of
major streets such as Lexington and N. Sprigg St., Hopper Road,
and Perryville Road. Also included are the bridge replacements
on Walker Creek.
The Community Development Program Area ($4,650,000) includes
only two projects as presently adopted, a replacement of Fire
Station No. 3, and construction of the CVB Recreation Theme
Project.
The Recreation Program Area ($1,305,000) includes a number of
small improvement projects and payment for the land acquisition
involving Osage and Shawnee Parks. The major cost item in this
area is the completion of the 10 mile hiking/biking trail in
conjunction with the Cape La Croix/Walker Branch Flood Control
Project.
IV
CONCLUSION
The capital improvement program adopted herein is an ambitious
program. The implementation of this program will allow for the
creation of new job opportunities, an increase in revenues to
private businesses, new businesses growing, existing businesses
expanding, increased tax revenues to all taxing jurisdictions,
and the strengthening of the quality of life in Cape Girardeau
and all of Southeast Missouri.
It is hoped that this plan will focus attention on community
goals, needs and capabilities; reduce scheduling problems and
conflicting or overlapping projects; maintain a sound and stable
financial program; enhance opportunities for participation in
federal or state funded programs; and achieve the highest public
benefit from the expenditure of City revenue.
The projects proposed in this document are the product of many
hours of deliberative thought by a number of people within this
community. The Charter requires an annual review and revision
of the Capital Improvements Program which assures that the
program remains responsive to changing demands, priorities, and
available revenues.
The final scope of this program as adopted by the City Council
is limited to affordable, achievable, priority projects. The
final plan should be regarded as a sound, fiscally responsible
working document that can and will be implemented through the
annual budget appropriation process of the City Council, support
from the citizens of Cape Girardeau for appropriate revenue
sources, and diligent action by the City staff.
JRF/AMS/bds
Respectfully submitted,
f �
/J. Ronald Fischer
City Manager
V
�el
✓ ,
Alvin M. Stoverink
Assistant City Manager
REVENUE SOURCES
A. General Fund Revenues F. Federal Grants and Loans
B. General Obligation Bonds G. Special Assessments
C. Revenue/PFA Bonds H. Capital Improvement
Sales Tax
D. State Grants and Loans
I. Other
E. Motor Fuel Tax Receipts
VI
Revenue Funding Sources by Fiscal Year
Capital Improvement Budget
12,OD0.�0�
8,ODD.Wa
h,OG0.000
d
1992-93 1993-94 1994—+95 1995--998 1996-97
VII
I
1
SUMMARY OF FUNDING
SOURCES BY FISCAL YEAR 1993-1998
!
J
i
I
SOURCE
J
OF FUNDS
I
i 1993-94
I
I I
! 1994-95 J
I I
I
1995-96 !
I
1996-97
I
1 1997-98
J
I
J
I
I
TOTAL J
J
I
! GENERAL
J
FUND REVENUES
I
1 E 172,250
I
I I
1$ 93,000 1$
I I
I
125,000 1
I
$ 100,000
I
1 5 70,000 1
! !
I
5
I
560,250 1
I
I
1 GENERAL
J
OBLIGATION BONDS
I
J
J
I I
J (
I J
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
S
000000 !
I
I
J REVENUE
BONDS/PFA
i
! $4,638,000
I I
I $2,368,090 J
I
$1,052,010 I
$ 600,000
I I
1 !
$
I
8,658,100 !
I
STATE GRANTS
I
1$ 412,500
I I
1$ 375,000 I
I
(
I I
I J
$
I
787,500 1
I
1 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPT
I
I
J $1,575,660
J
I I
1 $ 575,000 1
I I
I
$ 680,000 J
I
$ 400,000
I I
J $ 550,000 1
I I
I
$3,780,660 1
I
I
J FEDERAL
j
GRANTS
I
J $1,067,230
I
I I
1$ 162,000 1$
I I
I
520,000 J
I
I I
I i
I I
S
I
1,749,230 !
I
I
1 SPECIAL
j
ASSESSMENTS
I I
J $1,091,900 J
I I
I
$ 791,600 1
1
I
$1,014,100 J
J
$ 446,200
I I
J S 50,000 1$
I I
I
3,393,800 !
I
I
J CAPITAL
J
IMPROVEMENT SALES
I I
TAX 1 $2,312,500
I
I
1 $1,225,000 1
I I
I
$1,000,000 I
I
I I
I I
I I
S
I
4,537,500 J
I
I
J OTHER
J
I
J $ 700,000 J
I
I I
$ 555,000 1
I I
I
$1,410,000 J
!
S 360,000
I I
J S 360,000 1
I I
5
I
3,385,000 J
I
I
TOTALS
J
I I
1$11,970,040 1
1 1
I
$ 6,144,6901
I
I
$5,801,110 J
I
$1,906,200
I I
J $1,030,000 J
I I
I
$26,852,040 J
I
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1
I EXPENDITURES 1993-1998 BY PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND SOURCE OF FUNDS
I GENERAL IGENERAL I REVENUE I IMOTOR FUEL I I I CAPITAL ( I 1
PROGRAM I FUND IOBLIGAT.1 BONDS/ I STATE I TAX I FEDERAL I SPECIAL IIMPROVEMENTI I I
1DESCRIPTIONI REVENUES I BONDS I PFA I GRANTS I RECEIPTS I GRANTS (ASSESSMENT I SALES TAX I OTHER I TOTAL I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
ITRANSPORT. IS 105,250 1 IS 312,000 1 1$3,780,660 1$1,549,230 1$1,755,000 1$1,200,000 1 1$ 8,702,1401
1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I i
IENVIRONMENTI 1 1$ 3,746,1001$ 225,0001 1$ 200,000 1$1,638,800 1$3,150,000 1$3,235,000 1$12,194,9001
I I I I I I I J I I I I
I RECREAT I ON I I I I I I I I I I I
I AND 1$ 405,000 1 1 IS 562,5001 1 1 1$ 187,500 IS 150,000 IS 1,305,000,
ILEISURE I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
ICOMMUNITY 1$ 50,000 1 IS4,600,000 I I I I I I IS 4,650,0001
IDEVELOPMEMTI I I I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I TOTALS 1$ 560,2501 1$ 8,658,10015 787,500 1$3,780,660 1$1,749,230 1$3,393,800 IS4,537,500 1$3,385,000 IS26,852,0401
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Summary of Funding Sources
Capital Improvement Budget
STATE REVENUE/PFA
GRANTS/LOANS 3% \ BONDS 32%
MOTOR FUEL
TAX RECEIPT 14%
FEDERAL
GRANTS/LOANS 7%
SPECIAL.
ASSESSMENTS 13%
x
OTHER
13%
GENERAL
FUND REVENUES 2%
OAP I MP
SALES TAX 17%
Capital Improvement Budget
By Program Area
COM,iMUNffY
EVELOPMr1ENT 17%
TRANS PO RTAT1 O N
32%
ENVI RO NM ENT
45%
RECREATION
AND LEISURE 5%
XI
This page intentionally left blank.
Transportation
Ca ltc&l Improvement Budget
5,000.000
3,75D ODU
2,500.000
1,2,5D ODQ
U '
1943-94 1991-93 1995-95 1998-97 1997-98
TRANSPORTATION
PROPOSED PROJECTS
IPROJECTI
1
1 1993-94
I 1994-95
1 1995-96
I
1996-97
I 1997-98 I
(NUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
I TOTAL COST
I FISCAL YEAR
j FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR
I
FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR I
11-1 1
Lexington
I $1,100,000
I $1,100,000
1
1
I
I 1
I I
Street
I E,G
I E,G
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
i 1-2 i
Sprigg Street
I $ 502,640
1$ 502,640
I
I
I
I I
I I
l I
Bridge
1 E,F
I
I E,F
1
I
j
I
1
I
l
I I
1 1
I I
1 1-3 (
Street Overlay
I
I $ 750,000
I
I $ 150,000
I
I $ 150,000
I
1$ 150,000
I
I $
150,000
I I
1 S 150,000 I
I I
a
I E
I
I E
I
I E
j
I E
I
I
I
E
I E I
1 I
1 1-4 I
Hopper
I $1,300,000
I $ 50,000
I $ 600,000
1$ 650,000
1
1 I
I I
I I
Road
I E,F,G
I
I E
I
1 E,G
I E,F
1
I I
I i
311 Asphalt
1 1-5 I
Paving
I $ 250,000
1$ 50,000
I $ 50,000
1$ 50,000
1$
50,000
I $ 50,000 I
1 I
Program
I G
I
1 G
I
1 G
I
1 G
I
I
1
G
1 G 1
I I
1 1-6 I
North Sprigg
I $ 650,000
1 E 650,000
1
1
1
1 1
I I
1 I
Extension
1 E,G
I
I E,G
I
1
I
I
I
I
11-7 I
Perryville
I $ 750,000
1
I 1$
400,000
1$
350,000 I
I
I I
Road
I E,GE,G
E
I
I
I
I I
Extension
I
I
1
1 1-8 I
Broadway
I $ 400,000
I I
I
I
1
5 400,000 I
I I
1 I
I E
I
I i
I I
I
J
I
I
I
I
E I
I
i 1- 9 i
Good Hope
1$ 50,000
1 1
I
1$
50,000 1
I
1 I
I I
BridgeE
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
E I
l
I
I
1 1-10 1
Morgan Oak
I $ 50,000
I I
I
1$
50,000 1
I
I I
1 I
Bridge
I E
I
I I
I
1
I
I
E I
1
I
I
I I
11-11 1
North Main
I $ 50,000 1
1
I
1$
50,000 I
I
I 1
1 I
Widening
I E I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E I
j
I
I
I I
1 1-12 I
Mt. Auburn
I $ 380,000 1$
30,000 I
$ 100,000 1$
250,000 I
I
1
1 I
Extension
I E,GG
I
I I
I
I
E I
j
G 1
I
I
I
I
I
TRANSPORTATION
PROPOSED PROJECTS
IPROJECTI
i I
TOTALS I
I I
I I
1
I 1993-94
I 1994-95
I 1995-96 I 1996-97 I 1997-98 I
UMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
I TOTAL COST
I FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR I FISCAL YEAR I FISCAL YEAR I
I
I
I i I I
i
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
11-13 I
Lorimier
I
I$ 200,000
I
I
I
I$ 50,000
I I I I
I$ 150,000 I I I
I I
1 I
Extension
I E,G
I
I
I
I E
!
I G I I I
I I I L
I I
11-14 I
Flood Project
I
I$ 1,200,000
I
I $1,200,000
I
I
I I I I
I I I I
I I
J i
Bridges
I H
I
I H
I
I
I
I I I I
J I I I
I I
11-15 I
Airport ARFF
I
I$ 200,000
I
I$ 200,000
I
I
I I I I
I I I I
I i
I J
Equipment
I A,F
I
I A,F
I
I
I
I I I I
j I I I
I I
i 1-16 I
Airport Snow
I
I$ 180,000
I
I
I
I$ 180,000
I I I I
I I I I
I I
Equipment
I A,F
I
I A,F
I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
11-17 I Airport Rd./ I$ 179,000 I$ 179,000 I I I I
I I Parking I A,F I A,F I I I I I
I L l i 1 I I I L
I I I I i I I I I
11-18 I Airport water I$ 510,500 I$ 510,500 I I I I I
I I System I C, F I C, F I I I I I
I
I
1
i I
TOTALS I
I I
I I
S
8,702,140
I
I
I
I
$4,622,140
I
I $1,130,000
I
I
I I I I
I $1,650,000 I$ 700,000 I S 600,000 I
I I I I
I 1 1 L
I
I i
I
I
I i I I
i
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1 I I
I I I I
I l 1 L
A
I GENERAL FUND I$
105,250
i$
87,250
i$ 18,000
I I I I
B
I GEN. OBL. FUNDS I
I
I
I I I I
C
I REV/PFA BONDS I$
312,000
I$
312,000
I
I I ( I
D
I STATE GRANTS, LOANSI
I E
I MOTOR FUEL TAX I
$
3,780,660
I $
1,575,660
I $ 575,000
I $ 680,000 I $ 400,000 I $ 550,000 I
F
I FED. GRANTS, LOANS I
$
1,549,230
i $
867,230
I $ 162,000
I $ 520,000 I I I
I G
I SPEC. ASSESSMENTS I
$
1,755,000
I S
580,000
I $ 375,000 I
$ 450,000 I $ 300,000 I $ 50,000 I
H
I CAP. IMP. SALES TAXI
$
1,200,000
I$
1,200,000
I I
I I I
I I
I OTHER
I
i
1
I I
i I
I I
I
I
I
I I
i I
l l
I I I
I I I
I I I
PROJECT TITLE: LEXINGTON STREET
LOCATION: KINGSHIGHWAY TO ROUTE 177
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEXINGTON AS
AN ARTERIAL STREET RUNNING EAST AND WEST
ACROSS THE NORTH PART OF THE CITY.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 17,424 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE AND ASPHALT
PAVEMENT 44 FEET WIDE WITH CURBS.
CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE OVER CAPE LACROIX CREEK.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY TRAFFIC
FLOW EAST/WEST THROUGH THE NORTH PART OF THE
CITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 800,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$ 300,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
4
PROJECT TITLE: SPRIGG STREET PHASE III
LOCATION: SPRIGG STREET
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE CAPE LA
CROIX BRIDGE AT SOUTH SPRIGG STREET.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 110 LINEAR FOOT TWO-LANE BRIDGE
AND APPROACHES.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY
JUSTIFICATION: BRIDGE IS FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE, NEARING
STRUCTURAL OBSOLESCENCE. IT SERVES SEVERAL
MAJOR INDUSTRIES AND WILL SERVE THE WASTE
TRANSFER SITE FOR THE CITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $125,660 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$376,980 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
5
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
STREET OVERLAY
CITYWIDE
PURPOSE: PROVIDES FOR CONTINUING MAJOR STREET
MAINTENANCE PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FOR THE
OVERLAY OF 7 MILES OF LOCAL AND COLLECTOR
ASPHALT STREETS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: MILLING OR OTHER SURFACE PROFILING METHOD AND
ASPHALT OVERLAY.
UNIT OF WORK: CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: COST EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE TO PREVENT NEED FOR
FUTURE RECONSTRUCTION OF ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $750,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
0
PROJECT TITLE: HOPPER ROAD BRIDGE AND EXTENSION TO KAGE ROAD
LOCATION: HOPPER ROAD
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BRIDGE
ON HOPPER ROAD EAST OF MOUNT AUBURN ROAD AND
THE RECONSTRUCTION OF HOPPER ROAD FROM JUST
WEST OF THE CLIPPARD SCHOOL PROPERTY TO
MOUNT AUBURN ROAD. PROVIDE HOPPER ROAD
EXTENSION TO KAGE ROAD.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 110 LINEAR FOOT BRIDGE OVER CAPE LACROIX CREEK
WITH A MINIMUM OF TWO LANES. 7,650 LINEAR
FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT WITH
CURBS, 36 FEET WIDE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: BRIDGE IS FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE, TOO NARROW
FOR EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME. EXTEND EXISTING
HIGH TYPE PAYVEMENT ON HOPPER ROAD TO HANDLE
INCREASED TRAFFIC AND TO MATCH BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $455,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$520,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$325,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
7
PROJECT TITLE: 3" ASPHALT PAVING PROGRAM
LOCATION: VARIOUS CITY STREETS
PURPOSE: TO SURFACE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL GRAVEL
STREETS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: TWENTY FOOT (20') WIDE HOT MIX ASPHALTIC
CONCRETE SURFACING ON EXISTING GRAVEL STREET
BASE WHERE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE CAN BE ASSURED.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REDUCE GRAVEL STREET MAINTENANCE COSTS.
ENHANCE NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: REMOVAL OF APPROXIMATELY 7 MILES OF GRAVEL
STREETS WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE COSTS OF
GRADING AND ROCK REPLACEMENT.
FINANCING: $250,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
0
PROJECT TITLE: NORTH SPRIGG EXTENSION
LOCATION: NORTH SPRIGG STREET
PURPOSE: PROVIDE A NORTH -SOUTH LINK FOR VARIOUS EAST -
WEST ARTERIAL STREETS TO THE DOWNTOWN AREA.
EXTEND NORTH SPRIGG FROM BERTLING TO CONNECT
WITH THE LEXINGTON/MELODY LANE ARTERIAL.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 4,150 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT
PAVEMENT, 44 FEET WIDE WITH CURBS.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY FLOW OF
TRAFFIC IN THE COMMUNITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $200,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$450,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX (E)
E
PROJECT TITLE: PERRYVILLE ROAD
LOCATION: PERRYVILLE ROAD
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF
PERRYVILLE ROAD AS COLLECTOR STREET NORTH
TO THE CITY LIMITS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: THIS PROJECT IS 1 MILE AND INCLUDES
WIDENING AND ADDING CURBS AND GUTTERS.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: INCREASE THE SERVICE LEVEL OF THE ROADWAY
TO HANDLE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC VOLUME.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $250,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$500,000 MOTOR FUEL (E)
10
PROJECT TITLE: BROADWAY
LOCATION: BROADWAY
PURPOSE: PROVIDE IMPROVED TRAFFIC FLOW AND REDUCE
FLOODING ON A MAJOR ARTERY.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: WIDEN STREET TO FOUR LANES FROM CLARK STREET
TO CARUTHERS, UPGRADE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT
CARUTHERS, AND INSTALL STORMWATER RELIEF LINE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: STREET CURRENTLY IS SUBJECT TO FLASH FLOODING
AND TRAFFIC FLOW IS ROUTINELY CONGESTED
WITH LINES SEVERAL BLOCKS LONG.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $400,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
11
PROJECT TITLE: GOOD HOPE/FOUNTAIN BRIDGE REMOVAL
LOCATION: INTERSECTION OF GOODHOPE AND FOUNTAIN
PURPOSE: REPLACEMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: DEMOLISH STRUCTURE, FILL ACROSS FOUNTAIN
AND REPLACE GOOD HOPE PAVEMENT. PROTECT
ADJACENT SANITARY SEWER.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: USE OF BRIDGES BY RAILROAD HAS BEEN ABANDONED.
AGE OF BRIDGES AND DETERIORATION REQUIRE
ACTION TO MAINTAIN SAFETY OF GOOD HOPE.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 50,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
12
PROJECT TITLE: MORGAN OAK/FOUNTAIN BRIDGE REMOVAL
LOCATION: INTERSECTION OF MORGAN OAK AND FOUNTAIN
PURPOSE: REPLACEMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: DEMOLISH STRUCTURE, FILL ACROSS FOUNTAIN
AND REPLACE MORGAN OAK PAVEMENT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: USE OF BRIDGES BY RAILROAD HAS BEEN ABANDONED.
AGE OF BRIDGES AND DETERIORATION REQUIRE
ACTION TO MAINTAIN SAFETY OF MORGAN OAK.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 50,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
13
PROJECT TITLE: N. MAIN STREET WIDENING
LOCATION: FROM MILL STREET TO MASON STREET
PURPOSE: REHABILITATION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REDUCE THE DEGREE OF CURVATURE OF NORTH MAIN
AT MILL AND WIDEN PAVEMENT FROM MILL TO
MASON STREET TO 38', MODIFY DRAINAGE, OVERLAY
ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: IMPROVE TRAFFIC FLOW AND SAFETY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 50,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
14
PROJECT TITLE: MT. AUBURN EXTENSION
LOCATION: FROM BLOOMFIELD SOUTH TO PROPOSED MO HWY 74
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVING WITH CURBS AND DRAINAGE 44' WIDE
APPROXIMATELY
UNIT OF WORK: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION
JUSTIFICATION: TO CONNECT MT. AUBURN, A WEST SIDE ARTERIAL
STREET, WITH THE PROPOSED MO HWY 74
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 280,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$ 100,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
15
PROJECT TITLE: LORIMIER STREET EXTENSION
LOCATION: FROM MORGAN OAK SOUTH TO PROPOSED MO
HWY 74
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVING WITH CURBS 40 FEET WIDE APPROXIMATELY
1925 LINEAL FEET
UNIT OF WORK: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: TO PROVIDE A DIRECT ACCESS FROM THE
PROPOSED MO HWY 74 TO THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS
DISTRICT OF THE CITY
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 150,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$ 50,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
16
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - FLOOD PROJECT
THEMIS ST.
MERRIWTHER ST.
GOOD HOPE
ARBY'S BRIDGE
BESSIE ST.
MARIETTA ST.
LINDA ST.
BLOOMFIELD ST.
REPLACEMENT
(REALIGNMENT)
REMOVE AND REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
FLOOD CONTROL
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$1,200,0000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SALES TAX(H)
17
PROJECT TITLE: AIRPORT ARFF EQUIPMENT
LOCATION: FIRE STATION #2
CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE PROPER EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING FOR
AIRCRAFT RESCUE AND FIRE FIRE FIGHTING AT THE
AIRPORT.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: ONE ARFF VEHICLE TO BE STORED AT FIRE
STATION #2 AND EXISTING FIRE TRUCK AP2 WILL
BE STORED AT THE AIRPORT.
UNIT OF WORK: PURCHASE
JUSTIFICATION: TO UPGRADE AIRPORT FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT IN
CONFORMANCE WITH PART 135 INSPECTION
RECOMMENDATIONS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 20,000 GENERAL FUND (A)
$ 180,000 FEDERAL GRANTS/LOANS (F)
18
PROJECT TITLE: AIRPORT SNOW EQUIPMENT
LOCATION: CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE PROPER SNOW REMOVAL/ICE ABATEMENT
EQUIPMENT AT THE AIRPORT.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: ONE AIRPORT SNOW REMOVAL VEHICLE EQUIPPED
WITH PLOW AND MATERIAL SPREADER.
UNIT OF WORK: PURCHASE
JUSTIFICATION: TO PROVIDE AIRPORT WITH ADEQUATE SNOW
REMOVAL/ICE ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT TO PROVIDE
FOR SAFE OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 18,000 GENERAL FUND (A)
$ 162,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
19
PROJECT TITLE: AIRPORT ROAD/PARKING
LOCATION: CAPE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: TO UPGRADE EXISTING PARKING AREA AND PROVIDE
FOR BETTER INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE TERMINAL
BUILDING.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REALIGNMENT OF TERMINAL DRIVE AND IMPROVEMENTS
TO SURFACE AND DRAINAGE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: TO PROVIDE A BETTER FUNCTIONING FLOW OF
TRAFFIC AND DRAINAGE, AND TO PROVIDE AN
APPEALING APPROACH AND PARKING AREA FOR
AIRPORT PATRONS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 67,250 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
$ 111,750 FEDERAL FUNDS/LOANS (F)
20
PROJECT TITLE: WATER SYSTEM
LOCATION: CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: TO UPGRADE EXISTING WATER SYSTEM TO PROVIDE
ADEQUATE POTABLE AND FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
WATER.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REMOVE AND REPLACE UNDERGROUND WATER SYSTEM.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: EXISTING WATER SYSTEM IS DETERIORATED, IN
NEED OF REPLACEMENT, AND IS NOT ADEQUATE
FOR THE NEW TERMINAL BUILDING SPRINKLER
SYSTEM.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $198,500 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$312,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
21
This page intentionally left blank.
22
Environment
Capl'tcd Improvement Budget
5,OOD.{700
3,75D,OD0
2,�00.{IDD
1,35D.OD0
d
7943-9d 1994:-95 1495--96 1998:-47 1997-98
a3
24
ENVIRONMENT
I
I
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
I
I
IPROJECTI
1
1
1993-94 I
1994-95
I 1995-96
I 1996-97 I 1997-98 I
INUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
I TOTAL COST
I FISCAL YEAR J
FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR I FISCAL YEAR I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I I
12-1 I
Cape LaCroix -
I $3,000,000
I $1,000,000 I
$1,000,000
I $1,000,000 I
1 1
I I
Walker Creek
I H
I
H I
H
I H I
I 1
1 I
Flood Control
I
I
I
I (
I I
12-2 I
Upper Cape La
I S 850,000
I$
850,000 1
1 I
I 1
I 1
Croix - Phase IV
I C,D,F
I
C,D,F I
I I
I I
1 I
Trunk Sewers
12-3 I
S. Kingshighway
I$ 110,000
I$
20,000 I
S 90,000
I I
I 1
I I
I I
Sewer
I G
I
I
I
G I
I
G
I I
I I
I I
j j
I I
12-4 I
N. Kingshighway
I
I$ 130,000
I
I$
I
130,000 1
I I
I 1
I I
1 I
I I
1 I
Sewer
I G
I
I
I
G I
I
I I
j j
I I
i I
I I
12-5 I
I
Brink Sewer I$
80,000
I
($
I
80,000 I
I I
I 1
I I
1 I
I I
1 I
Replacement I
I
t
I
I
I I
j
I I
I I
I I
1 1
I I
12-6 I
I
Belleridge Sewers I$
150,000
I
I$
I
150,000
I I
I I
I I
Phase I I
G
I
G I
I I
I I
I I
12-7 I
I
Technology Park I$
33,500
I
i$
I
6,900 I$
26,600
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
Sewer I
I
G
I
!
G I
I
G
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
12-8 I
I
Twin Lakes I
$1,100,000
I
I
I
I$
50,000
I I
I $1,050,000 I
I I
I 1
I I
Trunk Sewer I
I
t
I
j
I
I
t
I I I
I I
I I
1 j
I I
12-9 I
I
Lakeshore Drive I$
160,300
I
I
I
I
I I
I$ 14,100 I
I I
S 146,200 I I
I I
l I
Sewer I
I
G
I
I
I
I
I G I
I j
G I I
I I
I I
12-10 j
I
Twin Lakes I$
550,000
I
I
I
1
I I
I$ 550,000 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
Laterals I
I
G
I
j
I
j
I G I
I I
I I
I I
I I
12-11 I
I
Clark Avenue I
$ 450,000
I
I $
I
50,000 I
I
$ 100,000 I
I
S 300,000 (
I I
1 1
I j
1 I
Relief I
I
C,I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I
C I
J
I I
I I
i 2-12 I
Boulder Crest i$
60,000
($
60,000 I
I
I
1 1
I I
1 I
Laterals I
I
G
I
I
G I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
12-13 I
I
West Side Relief I
$ 940,100
I
I
I
i
I
$ 188,090 I
I
$ 752,010
I I
I I
I I
Sewer I
I
C
I
j
I
I
C I
I
C I
I
I I
I I
24
ENVIRONMENT
PROPOSED PROJECTS
IPROJECTI
1
I
1 $
450,000
1
1993-94
J 1994-95 1 1995-96 1 1996-97 ( 1997-98 1
(NUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM 1
TOTAL COST
J FISCAL YEAR
( FISCAL YEAR I FISCAL YEAR ( FISCAL YEAR I FISCAL YEAR I
I i
J 2-14 1
I
Evergreen Sewer 1
$
145,000
I
J S
145,000
I I I I I
I I I I
I I
District I
I
G
J
G
I I I ( I
I i
` 2-15 1
I
Sludge Holding J
S
500,000
I
J S
500,000
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I
1 l
Tank 1
l
I
C
1
1
C
I I I I I
I l 1 I I
I I
1 2-16 1
I
Pneumatic Lime i
$
600,000
I
1$
600,000
I I i I I
I I
I I
Add. Station I
I
I Improvements
1
C
i
I
C
I I I I I
I l I i I
i I
1 2-17 I
i
College/Henderson i
$
400,000
I
i $
400,000
I I I I I
I I I ( I
I I
Trunk Sewer I
I
I
I
I I I I I
I I
1 2-18 1
I
Transfer Station J
$
90,000
I
i $
90,000
I I I i I
I I
Access Rd. I
100,000
I
i
I
I
I i
1 2-19 1
I
Recycling I
$
180,000
I
1
D
I I I I I
1 $ 180,000 I I I I
1 i
Center I
C
I
I
I
I C I I I I
I
1 2-20
I
1 Twin Lakes
I
1 $
450,000
I
1 $
150,000
I
1 $
300,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
I Water
(
C,G
(
C
i
G
I
I
I
1
( Water
I
I
I
I
(
I
I
1 2-21
1 Treatment Plant
1 $
455,000
1 $
190,000
J S
175,000
1 $ 30,000
J S 30,000
( S
30,000 I
(
I
I Improvements
1
I
1
C,I
I
I
C
I
1
I
( I
I
I I
I
I
1
I I
1
I
i Water
(
(
I
I
I
I
I
1 2-22
( Energy
I $
100,000
I $
100,000
(
I
I
I
I
(
I
I Conservation
I
(
1
D
I
J
D
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
( Water
1 2-23
I Seismic
J $
61,000
I $
61,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
i Protection
1
(
I
C
i
I
C
(
I
I
I
l
(
I Water
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J 2-24
i Meter
i $
250,000
1$
50,000
1 $
50,000
( $ 50,000
I $ 50,000
I $
50,000 I
J
( Replacement
I
I Water
1 2-25
J 2-- Main
1 $
750,000
i $
150,000
i $
150,000
( $ 150,000
( $ 150,000
( S
150,000 I
J
I
( Replacement
I
I
I
C,I
(
I
C
1
I
I
I I
I
( I
I
I
I
I J
j
(
I Water
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 2-26
( Distribution
J $
350,000
1 $
150,000
1 $
50,000
I $ 50,000
i $ 50,000
J $
50,000 J
(
I Improvements
(
C,I
I
C
I
I
I I
I I
I
I 1
25
26
ENVIRONMENT
I
1
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
I
1
IPROJECTI
1
1 1993-94 1
1994-95
I 1995-96
1 1996-97
I 1997-98
(NUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
I TOTAL COST
I FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR 1
I I
I I
Water
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
1 2-27 I
Dev. Main
I $
250,000
I S 50,000 I
S 50,000
I $ 50,000
( $ 50,000
I $ 50,000 I
I I
1 1
Extensions
1
I
1
I I I
I 1
I
I I
l
I I
1 1
I I I
1
I I
1 1
I I
TOTALS
I
I $12,194,900
I
I I
I $4,982,900 I
I I
$2,409,690
I
I $3,996,110
I
I I
I $ 476,200 I
I I
I
S 330,000 I
I
I I
1 1
I
1
I I
i i
I
i
I I
i i
I
1
A I
GENERAL FUNDS
I
I I
I
I I
I
B I
GEN. OBL. FUNDS
I
I I
I
I I
1 C 1
REV/PFA BONDS
I $
3,746,100
I $2,326,000 I
S 368,090 I
$1,052,010
I (
I
D I
STATE GRANTS/LOANS
I $
225,000
I $ 225,000 1
I
I I
I
E I
MOTOR FUEL TAX
I
I (
I
I I
I
F I
FED. GRANTS/LOANS
I S
200,000
I S 200,000 I
I
I I
I
G I
SPEC. ASSESSMENTS
I $
1,638,800
1 S 511,900 I
S 416,600 I
$ 564,100
I S 146,200 (
I
1 H I
CAP IMP SALES TAX
I S
3,150,000
1 51,050,000 I
$1,100,000 1
51,000,000
1 1
I
I I I
OTHER
1 $
3,235,000
1 $ 670,000 1
5 525,000 I
51,380,000 J
$ 330,000 I
S 330,000 1
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
26
PROJECT TITLE: CAPE LA CROIX - WALKER BRANCH
FLOOD CONTROL
LOCATION: CAPE LA CROIX AND WALKER CREEKS
PURPOSE: TO REDUCE FLOODING
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: THREE MILES CHANNELIZATION; 157 ACRE
DETENTION FACILITY; PARKS AND
RECREATION FACILITIES
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY,
AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: FLOODING IN THE CAPE LA CROIX-WALKER
CREEK WATERSHED IS CREATING SERIOUS
DAMAGE TO PROPERTY AND ENDANGERS THE
LIVES OF CAPE GIRARDEAU CITIZENS
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL AND MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT PER YEAR WILL BE REQUIRED
FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF THESE
FACILITIES.
FINANCING: $3,000,000* CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
SALES TAX (H)
*INCLUDES REMAINING LOCAL SPONSOR SHARE ONLY. BRIDGE RELOCATIONS
REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT ARE SHOWN IN TRANSPORTATION SECTION.
27
PROJECT TITLE: UPPER CAPE LA CROIX - PHASE IV
LOCATION: RT. W TO SAN DANGARO SUBDIVISION,
GOLF COURSE, AND CORPS DETENTION AREA
PURPOSE: TO EXTEND SEWER SERVICE TO NORTHWEST
PART OF CITY.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 4.5
MILES OF SANITARY TRUNK SEWERS
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: EXTENDS CITY SEWER SERVICES IN
NORTHWEST PART OF CITY AND WOULD
ELIMINATE FOUR SEWAGE LAGOONS AND
TWO PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASED DEPRECIATION EXPENSE.
FINANCING: $ 125,000 STATE GRANTS (D)
$ 200,000 CORPS OF ENGINEERS (F)
$ 525,000 REV BOND/SEWER FEES (C)
28
PROJECT TITLE: S. KINGSHIGHWAY SEWER
LOCATION: BOTH SIDES OF HWY 61 SOUTH FROM
SOUTHERN EXPRESSWAY
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 1680
FEET OF SANITARY SEWER AND
APPURTENANCES
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REPLACEMENT OF SEPTIC SYSTEMS IN
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
AREAS. SOIL CONDITIONS ARE POORLY
SUITED TO SEPTIC SYSTEMS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 110,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
29
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
NORTH KINGSHIGHWAY SEWER
NORTH KINGSHIGHWAY
NEW CONSTRUCTION
2800 FEET OF 8' SANITARY SEWER;
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
INCREASE DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
$ 130,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
30
PROJECT TITLE: BRINK SEWER REPLACEMENT
LOCATION: MONTGOMERY STREET SOUTH TO 21" LINE
CONNECTION
PURPOSE: REPLACEMENT OF LINE.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REPLACEMENT OF 8" SEWER LINE WITH A
10" LINE FROM MANHOLE #17 SOUTH TO
MANHOLE #12.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: THE BRINK STREET AREA HAS HAD NUMEROUS
SEWER BACK-UPS. THIS 8" LINE WAS
LAID AT A VERY FLAT GRADE THAT DOES
NOT PROMOTE CONTINUOUS FLOW.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: FEWER MAINTENANCE CALLS WOULD OCCUR IN
THIS AREA AND DIRECTLY NORTH OF THIS
REPLACEMENT.
FINANCING: $ 80,000 OTHER (I)
31
PROJECT TITLE: BELLERIDGE SEWERS PHASE I
LOCATION: BELLERIDGE SEWERS PHASE I
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 6800 LINEAR FEET OF 8"
SEWER WITH WYES AND MANHOLES
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REPLACE INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS
WITH CITY SANITARY SEWER
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASE DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
FINANCING: $ 150,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
32
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
GERHARDT LIFT STATION INTERCEPTER
(TECHNOLOGY PARK SEWER)
FROM ACESS STREET TO SOUTHERN
EXPRESSWAY
NEW CONSTRUCTION
APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET OF SANITARY
SEWER, ELIMINATING THE GERHARDT LIFT
STATION
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
REDUCE MAINTENANCE COST OF SEWER
SYSTEM, ELIMINATE A FEW RESIDENTIAL
AND COMMERCIAL SEPTIC TANKS
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$ 33,500 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
33
PROJECT TITLE: TWIN LAKES TRUNK SEWER
LOCATION: ALONG AND NORTH OF MO. RT. K TO TWIN
LAKES SUBDIVISION
PURPOSE: TO EXTEND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM TO
ANNEXED AREA OF CITY
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 7500 LINEAR FEET OF
PIPELINE INCLUDING MANHOLES AND
APPURTENANCES AND LIFT STATION AND
FORCE MAIN.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REQUIRED BY PROVISIONS OF ANNEXATION.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASE IN DEPRECIATION EXPENSE.
FINANCING: $1,100,000 OTHER (I)
34
PROJECT TITLE: LAKESHORE DRIVE SANITARY SEWER
LOCATION: LAKESHORE DRIVE
PURPOSE: REPLACE OLD EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEMS
WITH A NEW SANITARY SEWER
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 4780 FEET OF 8" SANITARY SEWER WITH
40 WYE CONNECTIONS
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PUBLIC HEALTH
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 160,300 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
35
PROJECT TITLE: TWIN LAKES LATERAL SEWERS
LOCATION: ALL WITHIN BOUNDARIES OF TWIN LAKES
ANNEXATION
PURPOSE: PROVIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IN LIEU
OF SEPTIC TANKS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 17,600 FEET OF PIPELINE
WITH MANHOLES, WYES, AND APPURTENANCES
INCLUDING LIFT STATION AND FORCE MAIN.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REQUIRED BY PROVISIONS OF ANNEXATION
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASE IN DEPRECIATION EXPENSE.
FINANCING: $ 550,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
36
PROJECT TITLE: CLARK AVENUE RELIEF
LOCATION: ALONG WALKER BRANCH FROM HOWELL ST.
TO PARKSITE DR.
PURPOSE: RELIEF LINE
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 5000 FEET OF 15"
DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER LINE
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: RELIEVE EXISTING OVERLOAD AND PERMIT
COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DRAINAGE
BASIN.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 300,000 REV. BOND/SEWER FEE (C)
$ 150,000 OTHER (I)
37
PROJECT TITLE: BOULDER CREST LATERAL
LOCATION: N. KINGSHIGHWAY FROM STARVUE TO
BOULDER CREST
PURPOSE: PROVIDE SANITARY SEWER TO DEVELOPING
AREA
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 895 LINEAR FEET OF
PIPELINE WITH MANHOLES, WYES, AND
OTHER APPURTENANCES.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: DEVELOPING COMMERCIAL AREA IS
OTHERWISE SERVED BY LESS DESIRABLE
SEPTIC TANK SYSTEMS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 60,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
PROJECT TITLE: WEST SIDE RELIEF SEWER
LOCATION: SOUTH OF BRINK SUBDIVISION ALONG
CAPE LA CROIX CREEK TO WEST END BLVD.
PURPOSE: RELIEF LINE AND REPLACEMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REPLACE A SEGMENT OF 21" DIAMETER
PIPE WITH 36" DIAMETER PIPE
APPROXIMATELY 5000 FEET
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: RELIEVE UPSTREAM SURCHARGING PROBLEMS
AND PROVIDE CAPACITY FOR FUTURE GROWTH
GENERATED BY THE EXTENSION OF UPSTREAM
TRUNK LINES
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 940,100 REV BONDS/SEWER FEES (C)
39
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
EVERGREEN SEWER DISTRICT
EVERGREEN DRIVE AREA
NEW CONSTRUCTION
3400 FEET OF 8" SANITARY SEWER;
2095 FEET OF 6" SANITARY SEWER
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
INCREASE DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
$ 145,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
40
PROJECT TITLE: SLUDGE HOLDING TANK
LOCATION: WASTEWATER PLANT
PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE NECESSARY STORAGE FOR
HOLDING OF SLUDGE FOR 30 DAY PERIOD.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: INSTALL EQUIPMENT, TANK AND PUMPS
AND VALVES TO HOLD SLUDGE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE FOR
ADEQUATE STORAGE OF SLUDGE DURING
INCLEMENT WEATHER UNDER CURRENT 503
REGULATIONS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: ADDED COSTS WILL OCCUR FOR DEPRECIATION
AND OPERATION EXPENSE.
FINANCING: $ 500,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
41
PROJECT TITLE: PNEUMATIC LIME ADDITION STATION
LOCATION: WASTEWATER PLANT
PURPOSE: TO MEET EPA REQUIREMENTS FOR SLUDGE
DISPOSAL.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: INSTALL EQUIPMENT TO APPLY LIME TO
SLUDGE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: TO KILL PATHOGENIC BACTERIA IN THE
CITY SLUDGE. THE PRESENT REGULATIONS
REQUIRE THIS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: ADDED COSTS WILL OCCUR FOR
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE AND LIME IN THE
TREATMENT PLANT OPERATIONS.
FINANCING: $ 600,000 REVENUE BONDS/SEWER FEES
(C)
42
PROJECT TITLE: COLLEGE/HENDERSON TRUNK SEWER
LOCATION: SEWER DISTRICT 5
PURPOSE: RECONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REPLACEMENT OF 21" SEWER FROM
COLLEGE STREET TO CAPE LA CROIX
CREEK
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PIPE JOINTS BADLY DETERIORATED AND
SUBJECT TO COLLAPSE AT NUMEROUS
LOCATIONS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: WILL REDUCE OPERATING COST BY
ELIMINATING COSTLY EMERGENCY
REPAIRS BUT WILL ADD DEPRECIATION
EXPENSE.
FINANCING: $ 400,000 OTHER (I)
43
PROJECT TITLE: ACCESS ROAD TO TRANSFER STATION
LOCATION: TRANSFER STATION, SOUTH SPRIGG ST.
PURPOSE: NEW ACCESS TO TRANSFER STATION.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: HARD SURFACE ASPHALT ROAD TO TRANSFER
STATION FROM SOUTH SPRIGG PER EASEMENT
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION: TO KEEP EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL AWAY
FROM LONE STAR ENTRANCE AND EQUIPMENT.
GREATER SAFETY AND EASIER ACCESS FOR
PUBLIC.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$ 90,000 OTHER (I)
44
PROJECT TITLE: RECYCLING BUILDING
LOCATION: 120 N. BROADVIEW ST.
PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE AND
SORTING ROOM FOR RECYCLING OPERATIONS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT 10,000 FOOT STEEL BUILDING
LOCATED ON N.W. CORNER OF THE WEST
PUBLIC WORKS LOT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: BUILDING WILL PROVIDE PRESENT AND
EXPANDING NEEDS OF THE RECYLING
PROGRAM.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASE IN MAINTENANCE AND
UTILITIES.
FINANCING: $ 180,000 PFA REV BONDS/SOLID
WASTE FEES (C)
45
PROJECT TITLE: TWIN LAKES WATER
LOCATION: TWIN LAKES SUBDIVISION AND ON HOPPER
ROAD FROM EAST OF I-55 TO LAMPE UNDER
I-55
PURPOSE: PROVIDE POTABLE WATER SERVICE FROM THE
CAPE GIRARDEAU SYSTEM TO THE TWIN
LAKES SUBDIVISION.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: TWIN LAKES (REPLACEMENT OF INTERNAL
PIPING):
APPROXIMATELY 8600' 6" AND 8" MAIN,
17 HYDRANTS, METERED SERVICES TO
PROPERTY LINE, ALL VALVES AND
APPURTENANCES. THIS REPLACES EXISTING
3" MAIN.
HOPPER ROAD MAIN EXTENSION:
APPROXIMATELY 4330' 8" MAIN, 9
HYDRANTS, METERED SERVICES TO PROPERTY
LINE, ALL VALVES AND APPURTENANCES.
THIS INCLUDES CASED CROSSING UNDER
I-55.
UNIT OF WORK: FEET OF PIPELINE.
JUSTIFICATION: TWIN LAKES IS PURSUING ANNEXATION TO
THE CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU AND DESIRES
CITY WATER.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASED WATER REVENUES THROUGH
METERED WATER SALES AND ADDITIONAL
TAX BASE.
FINANCING: $ 300,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$ 150,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
46
PROJECT TITLE: WATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS
LOCATION: PLANT NO. 1 AND NO. 2
PURPOSE: TO UPGRADE EXISTING FACILITIES TO
MEET SDWA REQUIREMENTS AND IMPROVE
EFFICIENCY OF OPERATIONS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REPLACEMENT AND UPGRADE OF VARIOUS
COMPONENTS OF TREATMENT PROCESS.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: NEW FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR WATER
QUALITY GO INTO EFFECT JULY 1, 1993.
ALSO, PLANT NO. 1 IS OLD AND HAS
CERTAIN COMPONENTS WORN OUT.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: WILL REDUCE OPERATING COSTS DUE TO
MORE EFFICIENT OPERATION.
FINANCING: $ 190,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
$ 265,000 OTHER (I)
47
PROJECT TITLE: ENERGY CONSERVATION PLANT AND
PRODUCTION FACILITIES
LOCATION: VARIOUS LOCATIONS AT PLATN #1, #2,
BOOSTER STATIONS, WELLS
PURPOSE: REDUCTION OF ENERGY USED AT PRODUCTION
AND PUMPING FACILITIES IN THE WATER
SYSTEM. THIS INCLUDES ELECTRICAL AND
NATURAL GAS CONSERVATION MEASURES.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: VARIOUS ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
MODIFICATIONS OR REPLACEMENTS
INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE
FREQUENCY DRIVE UNITS ON PUMP MOTORS,
MOTOR/PUMP REPLACEMENTS WITH HIGH
EFFICIENCY UNITS. REPLACEMENT OF
PLANT #1 1934 LOW EFFICIENCY HEATING
SYSTEM (BOILER) WITH HIGH EFFICIENCY
UNIT AND ASSOCIATED PIPING AND HEAT
EXCHANGERS.
UNIT OF WORK: VARIES DEPENDING ON SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT
JUSTIFICATION: THIS WORK WILL PROVIDE ENERGY COST
SAVINGS BOTH SHORT AND LONG TERM AND
MITIGATE IMPACT OF FUTURE ENERGY RATE
INCREASES. THIS WILL ALSO EXTEND
COMPONENT LIFE SPANS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: ENERGY COST SAVINGS ANNUALLY OF
APPROXIMATELY $30,000.
FINANCING: $ 100,000 STATE GRANTS/LOANS (D)
PROJECT TITLE: SEISMIC PROTECTION
LOCATION: TREATMENT PLANTS AND STORAGE TANKS
PURPOSE: MINIMIZE DAMAGE AND WATER LOSS IN
THE EVENT OF SEISMIC ACTIVITY.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: AUTOMATIC ISOLATION VALVES AND
FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS AT INFLUENT/
EFFLUENT PIPING TO TANKS.
UNIT OF WORK: CONNECTION 1 TANK PER YEAR
JUSTIFICATION: MAINTAIN INTEGRITY OF DRINKING WATER
SUPPLY IN THE EVENT OF SEISMIC
ACTIVITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 61,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
49
PROJECT TITLE: WATER METER REPLACEMENT
LOCATION: VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY
PURPOSE: TO REPLACE AGED, INACCURATE METERS
WITH NEW METERS SO THAT WATER BILLINGS
REFLECT ACTUAL USAGE.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: IMPLEMENT 10 YEAR METER TEST PROGRAM
REPLACING METERS OUTSIDE AWWA
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS FOR ACCURACY.
UNIT OF WORK: EACH METER.
JUSTIFICATION: METERS TYPICALLY REGISTER LESS THAN
THE QUANTITY ACTUALLY CONSUMED AS
THEY AGE AND MECHANCIAL WEAR OCCURS.
THIS RESULTS IN LOST REVENUES.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: WILL INCREASE REVENUE, ESTIMATED 5-10%
DIFFERENTIAL PER METER.
FINANCING: $ 250,000 OTHER (I)
50
PROJECT TITLE: 2" MAIN REPLACEMENT
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
PURPOSE: REHABILITATION OF SUBSTANDARD, HIGH
FAILURE/REPAIR SECTIONS OF THE
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WITH
NEW 6" MAIN TO IMPROVE SERVICE,
INCREASE FIRE FLOWS AND REDUCE
MAINTENANCE COSTS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REPLACE EXISTING MAIN WITH NEW 6"
MAIN, REPLACE EXISTING SERVICES TO NEW
LINE.
UNIT OF WORK: MAIN IN FEET, SERVICES EACH
JUSTIFICATION: EXISTING MAINS ARE GALVANIZED, BADLY
CORRODED AND FAIL FREQUENTLY. MINIMAL
FIRE FLOWS ARE POSSIBLE IN EXISTING
MAINS. REPLACEMENT OF SERVICES WILL
REMOVE LEAD SOURCE IN THE OLDEST
SERVICES.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING: $ 600,000 OTHER (I)
$ 150,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
51
PROJECT TITLE: DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS
LOCATION: DISTRIBUTION MAINS - CITY WIDE
PURPOSE: INSTALL NEW MAIN PIPING CONNECTING
EXISTING MAIN PIPING SUCH THAT FIRE
FLOWS, PRESSURE, AND WATER QUALITY
ARE IMPROVED.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: INSTALL 6" AND 8" MAIN TO EXISTING
"DEAD ENDS" IN DISTRIBUTION GRID.
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION: WILL IMPROVE FIRE FLOWS, PRESSURE,
AND WATER QUALITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: POSSIBLE LOWER PUMPING COSTS.
FINANCING: $ 150,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
$ 200,000 OTHER (I)
52
PROJECT TITLE: WATER DEV. MAIN EXTENSIONS
LOCATION: VARIOUS
PURPOSE: EXTENSION OF WATER SERVICE TO NEW
DEVELOPED AREAS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 8 MILES OF 6 AND LARGER
MAINS.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: EXTENSION OF WATER MAINS IS AN
ESSENTIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT NEED
TO ENHANCE GROWTH.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASE IN DEPRECIATION EXPENSE.
FINANCING: $ 250,000 OTHER (I)
53
This page intentionally left blank.
54
Recreation & Leasure
Capital Improvement Budget
7.50.000--
450.000--
W0,000
50.400450.000300.000
150.000
d
1993-94 1994-95 193.5-96 199&-97 1997-98
55
56
RECREATION
AND
LEISURE
I
J
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
I
I
IPROJECTI
1
1
1993-94 I
1994-95
1
1995-96
I
1996-97
1
1997-98 1
NUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
I
TOTAL COST
I
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR
I
FISCAL YEAR
I
FISCAL YEAR
I
FISCAL YEAR I
I I
13-1 1
Capaha Park
I
1$
85,000
I
1$
I
35,000 1
5
25,000
I
1$
25,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
Shelter, Courts
1
A
1
A 1
A
I
A
I
I
I
j I&
Playground
I I
1 3-2 1
Washington
I
1$
45,000
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1 S
25,000
I
I $
I
20,000 I
I I
J l
Park
I
I
A
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
A
I
I
A I
I
I I
1 3-3 I
Arena Park
I
I $
25,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I $
I
25,000 I
I
I
I I
J 1
Shelter
I
I
A
I
l
I
l
I
I
I
I
A I
I
I
I
I I
1 3-4 1
Land
I
1$
250,000
I
1$
I
50,000 1$
50,000
I
1 5
50,000
I
I $
I
50,000 1
5
I
50,000 I
I I
1 I
Acquisition
I
I
A
1
I
A 1
1
A
I
I
A
I
I
A 1
I
A 1
I
I I
1 3-5 I
Hiking/Biking
I
1$
750,000
I
1$
I
250,000 I
$
500,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
J I
Trail
1
I
D,H
1
I
D,H I
1
D,H
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
13-6 1
Golf Course
I
1$
150,000
I
1$
I
30,000 1
5
30,000
I
I $
I
30,000 1$
I
30,000 1
5
I
30,000 1
I I
Improvements
1
I
1
I I
I
1
I I
I 1
I 1
I I
I I
I I
J I
TOTALS
I
I $1,305,000
I
j
I
1$
I
I
I
365,000 I
I
I
S
605,000
I
1 S
I
I
I
105,000 1
I
I
5
I
130,000 1$
I
I
I
100,000 1
I
I
I I
I I
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 A 1
GENERAL FUNDS
1$
405,000
I $
85,000 1
$
75,000
1$
75,000 I
$
100,000 1$
70,000 1
1 B 1
GEN. OBL. FUNDS
I
(
I
I
I
I
I
C 1
REV/PFA BONDS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 D I
STATE GRANTS/LOANS
I $
562,500
I $
187,500 I
$
375,000
I
I
I
I
1 E I
MOTOR FUEL TAX
I
(
I
I
I
I
I
I F 1
FED. GRANTS/LOANS
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1 G 1
SPEC. ASSESSMENTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
H 1
CAP IMP SALES TAX
1$
187,500
1$
62,500 1$
125,000
I
I
I
I
J I I
OTHER
1$
150,000
1 S
30,000 1
$
30,000
1 $
30,000 I
$
30,000 I
S
30,000 I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
J I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
56
PROJECT TITLE: CAPAHA SHELTER, COURTS, & PLAYGROUND
LOCATION: CAPAHA PARK - NORTHEAST CORNER
PURPOSE: REPLACE TWO DETERIORATED SHELTERS
WITH ONE LARGE SHELTER; UPGRADE
BASKETBALL COURT AND PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF LARGE SHELTER,
30' X 601, AND INSTALL LARGE PLAY-
GROUND UNIT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REDESIGN PARK AREA TO PROVIDE BETTER
PICNIC AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 85,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A)
57
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
WASHINGTON PARK IMPROVEMENTS
WASHINGTON PARK
PROVIDE PICNIC AND RECREATIONAL
FACILITIES AT WASHINGTON PARK
CONSTRUCTION OF PICNIC SHELTER AND
PLAYGROUND UNIT
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: DEVELOP THE PARK TO PROVIDE PICNIC
AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES IN THIS
AREA.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
$ 45,000 GENERAL FUND (A)
W
PROJECT TITLE: ARENA PARK SHELTERS
LOCATION: ARENA PARK
PURPOSE: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PICNIC FACILITIES
AND REPLACE OLD SHELTER.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF PARK SHELTER RANGING
IN SIZE FROM 20' X 20' TO 30' X 60'
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: OLD SHELTER DETERIORATED AND DOES
NOT FIT NEW DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 25,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A)
59
PROJECT TITLE: LAND ACQUISITION
LOCATION: SHAWNEE AND OSAGE PARKS
PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL GREEN SPACE
AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PURCHASE OF 90 ACRES OF LAND
UNIT OF WORK: PAYMENTS ON LAND PURCHASED IN 1992
AND 1993.
JUSTIFICATION: ADDITIONAL AREA IS NEEDED FOR A
COMMUNITY/CONVENTION CENTER, SPORTS
COMPLEX, AND HIKING/BIKING TRAIL, AND
URBAN NATURAL CONSERVATION AREA.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASING PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT
FOR MAINTENANCE.
FINANCING: $ 250,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A)
PROJECT TITLE: HIKING/BIKING TRAIL
LOCATION: ALONG CAPE LA CROIX CREEK FROM
SHAWNEE PARK THROUGH THE DETENTION
BASIN PARK
PURPOSE: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RECREATION
OPPORTUNITIES AND IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN/
BICYCLIST SAFETY.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 10 MILES OF 6-8' WIDE ASPHALT TRAIL.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST USE OF
HIGHWAYS AND STREETS CREATES HAZARDS
FOR THE DIVERGENT USES OF FACILITIES
CONSTRUCTED FOR MOTOR VEHICLES.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASED PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT
WILL BE NEEDED TO MAINTAIN THIS
FACILITY.
FINANCING: $ 562,500 STATE GRANTS/LOANS (D)
$ 187,500 CAP IMP SALES TAX (H)
61
PROJECT TITLE: GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS
LOCATION: CAPE JAYCEE MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
PURPOSE: TO IMPROVE FACILITIES FOR EXPANDING
USE.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CLUBHOUSE ADDITION, PARKING
EXPANSION, CART STORAGE BUILDING
ADDITION AND CART PATHS.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: EXPANDING USE OF COURSE REQUIRES
MORE SPACE TO HANDLE THE NUMBER OF
CUSTOMERS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: MINOR INCREASED MAINTENANCE.
FINANCING: $150,000 OTHER (I)
62
Com mune t y Development
Capital Improvement Budget
2,000.000
1,5DD.Wa
1,000.000
;50D.000
1993-94 1994.-95 1935--96 1998-97 1997-98
63
64
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
I
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
(
I
1PROJECTI
JNUMBER I
1
IMPROVEMENT ITEM 1
TOTAL COST I
1 1993-94 (
FISCAL YEAR I
1994-95
FISCAL YEAR
1 1995-96
I FISCAL YEAR
1 1996-97 ( 1997-98 I
I FISCAL YEAR I FISCAL YEAR I
I I
1 4-1 I
I#3
1 I
I
Fire Station I$
Relocation I
I
650,000
A,C
( I
( 1
( 1
I I
I
1$ 50,000
( A
I
I I I
( S 600,000 I I
1 C
1 I 1
I I
14-2 I
I I
J I
I
CVB Project I
I
I
54,000,000
C
I I
( $2,000,000 (
I C I
I 1
$2,000,000
C
I
1
I
1
I I I
I
I I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I
TOTALS I
I
I
I
54,650,000
I
( $2,000,000 1
I I
I t
$2,000,000
I
I S 50,000
I
I
I I I
I S 600,000 ( 1
I I I
I I J
i I
I I
I
I
!
I
I I
1 I
t
I
I
1
I I I
I I I
( t 1
A I
B I
I C I
D I
I E i
I F i
I G 1
1 H I
I I I
GENERAL FUNDS i
GEN. OBL. FUNDS I
REV/PFA BONDS 1
STATE GRANTS,LOANS I
MOTOR FUEL TAX
FED. GRANTS,LOANS I
SPEC. ASSESSMENTS 1
CAP IMP SALES TAX I
OTHER (
S 50,000 I
I
$4,600,000 I
I
I
I
I
(
i
I
$2,000,000 I
I
I
I
I
1
$2,000,000
1 5 50,000
I
I
(
I
I
I
1
( I I
I I I
I S 600,000 I I
I
I I
I
I I I
I
I I
I I
I I
J I
I
I
I
l
I
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
I ( I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I I
I i
1 I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I 1
I I
i I
I I
J I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
1 l I
I I
I I
I I
J l
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I 1 I
I i
I I
I I
I I
I
I
t
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
l I I
I I
I I
I I
J I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
i
1
I
I
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I t
I I
I I
J i
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I I I
I I I
I I t
64
PROJECT TITLE: FIRE STATION NO. 3 RELOCATION
LOCATION: SPRIGG AND BERTLING
PURPOSE: TO REPLACE A BUILDING THAT IS 40+ YEARS
OLD; TO RELOCATE TO MORE DESIRABLE
DESCRIPTION: 1 -STORY BRICK VENEER BUILDING; TWO BAY
DRIVE-THROUGH TRUCK ROOM; BASEMENT UNDER
LIVING QUARTERS.
UNIT OF WORK: ACQUIRE LAND; DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: CURRENT BUILDING IS OBSOLETE.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 50,000 GENERAL FUND (A)
$600,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
65
PROJECT TITLE: CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU RECREATION
PROJECT
LOCATION: SHAWNEE PARK AND OSAGE PARK
PURPOSE: TO PROMOTE INCREASED CONVENTIONS AND
TOURISM TO THE COMMUNITY BY PROVIDING
A COMPLETE RECREATION PACKAGE AND
PROVIDING A SITE TO BE USED FOR HOUSING
CONVENTIONS, MEETINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
BOTH LOCAL AND NON -LOCAL
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF 5 BALLFIELD COMPLEX AND
4 SOCCER FIELDS AND CONSTRUCTION OF
32,000 SQ. FT. COMMUNITY RECREATION
CENTER.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: FACILITIES CURRENTLY AVAILABLE DO NOT
ADEQUATELY MEET THE NEEDS OF CURRENT
AND POTENTIAL USERS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASED PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT WILL BE
NEEDED TO MAINTAIN THESE FACILITIES, BUT
INCREASED REVENUES ARE PROJECTED TO
OFFSET THESE COSTS.
FINANCING: $4,000,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
LONG RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Unfunded Needs List
The following list of Capital Improvement Program Needs consists of
those projects which have been identified as major long range
facility improvements for which funding is currently not available.
No preliminary engineering or cost estimating has been done on
these projects. These projects are not listed in any order of
priority.
TRANSPORTATION
1) West End Boulevard - Lexington to Southern Expressway - (4 -lane)
2) N. Sprigg- Lexington to Rt. 177
3) Mt. Auburn Rd. - Rte. 74 to Southern Expressway
4) Southern Expressway to Mt. Auburn Rd.
5) Silver Springs Rd. - Bloomfield to Southern Expressway
6) Siemers Dr. - Bloomfield to Rte. 74
7) Broadway - Caruthers to West End Blvd. (4 -lane)
8) Bloomfield Rd. - Kingshighway to Mt. Auburn
9) New Madrid St. - Henderson to Perry Ave. (incl. intersection
realignment at Henderson)
10) Vantage Dr. - Percy St. to Rt. W
11) Sidewalks - through -out the City
12) Street Lighting Improvements
13) Kingshighway/Maria Louise/Cape Rock Road Intersection
14) Independence Street from Kingshighway to West End Boulevard -
widening to add center turn lane
15) Broadview from North Kingshighway to Independence Street (401)
16) Additional Overlay Programs
17) Curb and gutter restoration - City wide
18) Additional Streets per Major Street Plan
19) Security fencing and automatic gates - Airport
20) Airport ramp and taxiway extension
21) Corporate road extension - Airport
22) Land acquisition - Airport
23) Airport Improvement Program per Airport Master Plan
24) Airport Industrial Park
25) Airport Runway Extension - Main Runway 10-8
26) Airport Terminal Area Relocation
27) Clark Ave. - Lombardo to Marietta
28) Silver Springs Road - William to dead end
29) Kage Road - Mt. Auburn to Hopper
67
ENVIRONMENT
1) N. Sprigg Street trunk extension
2) Ramsey trunk (I-55 to Jackson)
3) Highland Drive sewer
4) Sewer Improvement Program per Sewer Master Plan
5) Stormwater/Flood Control Projects per Stormwater Master Plan*
6) Stormwater Detention Basins
*currently being developed
PARKS AND RECREATION
1) Land Acquisition (Downtown and growth areas)
2) Park Restroom Facilities
3) Capaha Lagoon
4) Capaha Baseball Diamond Completion
5) Maintenance Facilities
6) Parking Facilities
7) Shelters
8) Fort D Renovation
9) Golf Course Club House
10) Golf Course Development
11) Fair Exposition Facility
12) Capaha Pool Replacement
13) Senior Citizens Center
14) Park Lighting
15) Multi -Use Play courts
16) Park Concession Stands
17) Park Road Improvements
18) Detention site park dev.
19) Golf Course Maintenance Facility Expansion
COM ONITY DEVELOPMENT
1) Public Safety Annex/EOC/Communications Center
2) Neighborhood and Downtown Redevelopments
3) Historic Preservation
4) Public Safety Training Center
5) Acquisition of Additional Land for Training Center
6) Salt storage building
7) Public Works Center Improvements
8) Acquisition of Property for additional parking for
Fire Station No. 1
C -V]