HomeMy WebLinkAboutCIP1992-1997rem
FA�I7�771➢�I
O
oil
rio
ja
CITY OF
CAPE GIRARDEAU
MISSOURI
BILL NO. 92-44 RESOLUTION NO. V
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL 1992 - 1997
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Article VI, Section 6.04 of the Charter of the City
of Cape Girardeau requires a Capital Improvement Program; and'
WHEREAS, the City Manager has presented a proposed Capital
Improvement Program to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, -proper notice has been published concerning the
availability for inspection of the proposed Capital Improvement
Program and the time and place for a public hearing on the Capital
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on the
proposed Capital Improvement Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
ARTICLE 1. The City Council hereby adopts the five-year
Capital Improvement Program for fiscal 1992-1997, copies of which
are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
ARTICLE 2. The City Clerk is instructed to attach an executed
copy of this resolution to a copy of the Capital Improvement
Program for fiscal 1992-1997 and to retain such copy with the
permanent records of the City.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS �� ' DAY OF `1Y aAzk.) , 19 9� .
rancis E. Rhodes, Mayor
ATTEST:
Q
KimberlyW. Pruett
Deputy C y Clerk
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM
PAGES
Introduction:
City Manager's Letter
I
Revenue Sources
VI
summaries:
Revenue Funding Sources By Fiscal Year Graph
VII
Summary of Funding Sources by Fiscal Year 1992-1997
VIII
Summary of Recommended Capital Improvement Program
IX
Expenditures 1990-1995 by Program Description and
Source of Funds
Summary of Funding Sources Graph
X
Capital Improvement Budget By Program Area Graph
XI
Capital Improvements Program:
Transportation
1 - 21
Environment
22 - 43
Recreation and Leisure
44 - 51
Community Development
52 - 54
Unfunded Needs List
55 - 56
March 16, 1992
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Cape Girardeau
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
INTRODUCTION
In accordance with Article VI, Section 6.04 of the City Charter,
a recommended five year capital program was submitted to the
City Council. This five year plan is for the period July 1,
1992, through June 30, 1997. On March 16, 1992, in accordance
with the City Charter, the City Council held a public hearing
for the Capital Improvement Program. Following public input,
the City Council passed a resolution on that day adopting the
Capital Improvement Program. It should be noted that this final
Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 1992-1997 includes
some changes from the proposed document.
The material contained within the budget document complies with
the requirements of the Charter as to program proposals, cost
estimates, methods of financing, projection of revenue sources
to meet costs, recommended time schedule for each improvement,
and any anticipated impact on the annual operating budget.
In reviewing the proposed document, the City Council gave
particular emphasis to establishing priorities for projects and
realistic financing sources for implementation. While the
projects included herein are attainable through available
revenue sources, a number of these depend on the cooperation of
property owners and other agencies. Projects for which a
reliable funding source is not currently available without voter
authorization are included under the Unfunded Needs Section.
Each of the major advisory boards to the City Council and
department heads were invited to submit proposed projects for
consideration in this program. In addition, a number of
projects from the previous five-year capital improvement program
are also included.
BACKGROUND
The Capital Improvement Program should be considered as an
investment in the future of our community. The selection and
evaluation of capital projects is a difficult task that involves
some speculation and the ability to make estimations which, to
some extent, are based on historical perspectives.
I
The City Council, in 1983, formally considered and adopted a
long range Capital Improvement Program for the first time under
the current Charter requirement. This budget document process
should provide a relevant approach to identifying and
implementing important community -wide projects.
PROGRAM AND FINANCING DESCRIPTIONS
The major category program areas in which the various projects
have been described include Transportation, Environment,
Recreation and Leisure Time, and Community Development.' These
major categories contain the following types of projects:
1. Transportation. The activities in this area provide 'for
the construction of the public streets within the City and
Municipal Airport improvements.
2. Environment. The preservation, restoration, and care of
the physical resources of the City, including the control
of solid waste, wastewater, and stormwater.
3. Recreation and Leisure Time. The programs under this area
provide the facilities for citizens to enjoy an
opportunity to participate in organized and unorganized
leisure time activities.
4. Community Development. Activities under this area include
construction of general public facilities and community
projects which have citywide effect.
We have included the types of revenue sources which are
recommended as ways to consider for the financing of the various
capital improvements. The following is a brief discussion of
what the various revenue sources include.
A. General Fund Revenues. These revenues would be included
and available on an annual appropriation basis from the
City's general fund, which includes the receipt of
revenues from many and various sources.
B. General Obligation Bonds. These bonds are issued for the
financing of general public improvements and must be
authorized by a 4/7 majority vote of the citizens.
Approval of these bonds by the electorate also authorizes
a property tax levy to retire the debt.
II
C. Revenue/PFA Bonds. These bonds are issued for the
financing of self-supporting and general public
improvements. Revenue bonds are not included within the
limitations of indebtedness by the City and are issued
upon the authorization of a majority voter approval.
These bonds are used for enterprise funds such as water,
sewer and electric utilities, as well as the Airport and
Golf Course operations. PFA Bonds are issued upon City
Council approval based on collateralized assets and annual
lease/purchase appropriations. Cash flows for debt
retirement come from the existing revenue and from new
receipts to be generated by the facilities' operations.
D. State Grants. The City is eligible to submit grant
applications to the State of Missouri for funds that they
may have available either from their own revenue sources
or, in some cases, from revenue sources that they
administer for various federal agencies.
E. Motor Fuel Tax Receipts. This fund provides for the
receipt and disbursement of the revenues the City receives
as its portion of the State Gasoline Tax, State Motor
Vehicle Licensing, and State Motor Vehicle Sales Tax. The
revenues from this source can be used for capital, as well
as annual operating maintenance expenses as they relate to
improvements on the City's streets.
F. Federal Grants. The City is eligible to receive various
federal grants on a competitive basis from the appropriate
federal agency. This could include the Environmental
Protection Agency as it relates to wastewater
improvements, the Federal Highway Administration which
administers and distributes funds from the Federal
Gasoline Tax revenue through the Federal Aid Urban
program, or the Federal Aviation Administration for
airport improvements.
G. Special Assessments. This category provides for the
consideration of special assessments which are used for
public improvements affecting specific areas. The total
or a portion of the cost of an improvement is divided
among property owners who benefit from the project. This
type of funding can be used for diverse improvements
including streets, storm water, sanitary sewer or sidewalk
improvement.
H. Capital Improvement Sales Tax. A 1/4 cent, 3/8 cent, or
1/2 cent Sales Tax can be issued by the City for various
general types of public improvements. Such a tax requires
the approval by the electorate with simple majority. In
November, 1988, the voters of Cape Girardeau adopted a
1/4 cent sales tax effective January 1, 1990, restricted
to flood control projects.
III
I. Other. This category is used for donations, operating
revenues from funds other than the General Fund, reserves,
proceeds from the sale of fixed assets, etc.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The total Capital Improvement Program included here is
$23,815,340. This program is $10,320,102.00 less than the
program approved last year, primarily due to reduced revenue
projections and exclusion of any projects requiring voter
authorization.
The largest category for funding adopted improvements over the
next five years is through Revenue Bonds. This provides for
$8,513,100.00 in funding over this period of time.
The second largest source of funding for adopted improvements is
through the use of Capital Improvement Sales Tax ($6,600,000).
This revenue source would be utilized totally for flood control
improvements.
The third largest funding source is the Special Assessments
($3,022,540), which will be used for street and lateral sewer
projects. This area is adopted to be used based on the
traditional policy in Cape Girardeau that improvements should be
paid by those property owners directly benefiting from a
project. However, cash flow financing of the 10 year payment
plan places an additional burden on the City's revenues when a
project is undertaken.
The largest program area is Environment ($15,739,500). The most
significant projects in this area are the funding of the Corps
of Engineers Flood Control on Cape La Croix Creek -Walker
Branch and the separation of storm and sanitary sewers in the
College/Henderson watershed.
The Transportation Program area ($7,020,840) contains the second
largest amount of adopted expenditures over the next five year
period. This is due primarily to the continuing construction of
major streets such as Lexington and N. Sprigg St. Some other
major streets, most notably Perryville Rd. and Hopper Rd., had
to be deleted.
The Community Development Program Area ($650,000) includes only
one project as presently adopted, a replacement of Fire Station
No. 3, and is dependent on sufficient general fund revenues
becoming available to finance lease -hold revenue bonds through
the PFA.
The Recreation Program Area ($405,000) includes a number of
small improvement projects, payment for the land acquisition
adjoining Shawnee Park, and the City's 50% share of the cost to
replace the Central Municipal Pool bubble.
IV
CONCLUSION
The capital improvement program adopted herein is significantly
reduced, but is still an ambitious program. The implementation
of this program will allow for the creation of new job
opportunities, an increase in revenues to private businesses,
new businesses growing, existing businesses expanding, increased
tax revenues to all taxing jurisdictions, and the strengthening
of the quality of life in Cape Girardeau and all of Southeast
Missouri.
It is hoped that this plan will focus attention on community
goals, needs and capabilites; reduce scheduling problems and
conflicting or overlapping projects; maintain a sound and stable
financial program; enhance opportunities for participation in
federal or state funded programs; and achieve the highest public
benefit from the expenditure of City revenue.
The projects adopted in this document are the product of many
hours of deliberative thought by a number of people within this
community. The Charter requires an annual review and revision
of the Capital Improvements Program which assures that the
program remains responsive to changing demands, priorities, and
available revenues. We plan reviewed the various projects and
funding proposals contained within this document with City
Council members in various work sessions and the public
hearing.
The final scope of this program as adopted by the City Council
following the appropriate public hearing is limited to
affordable, achievable, priority projects. The final plan
should be regarded as a sound, fiscally responsible working
document that can and will be implemented through the annual
budget appropriation process of the City Council, support from
the citizens of Cape Girardeau for appropriate revenue sources,
and diligent action by the City staff.
JRF/AMS/jad
V
Respectfully submitted,
J. Ronald Fischer
City Manager
�&- V. fi��J
Alvin M. Stoverink
Assistant City Manager
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
REVENUE SOURCES
General Fund Revenues
General Obligation Bonds
Revenue/PFA Bonds
State Grants
Motor Fuel Tax Receipts
VI
F. Federal Grants
G. Special Assessments
H. Capital Improvement
Sales Tax
I. Other
Revenue Funding Sources by Fiscal Year
Capital Improvement Budget
14,000.400
8,000.400
6,000.000
4,000.400
2,000.400
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-98 1996-97
VII
I
I
I
SUMMARY OF FUNDING
SOURCES BY FISCAL YEAR 1992-1997
I
1
j
I
SOURCE
OF FUNDS
I I
1 1992-93 1
I
1993-94 1
i
1994-95 1
1995-96
I
1 1996-97
I
I
I
TOTAL 1
I
I GENERAL
I
FUND REVENUES
I I
1 S 75,000 1
I l
I
$ 75,000 i
I
I
S 75,000 1
I
5 125,000
I I
1 $ 75,000 1
I 1
5
I
425,000 1
l
I
I GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
1 I
S
I
000000 1
I
I REVENUE
J
BONDS/PFA
I I
151,205,200 1
I J
I
$2,459,090 (
I
I
$2,148,810 1
j
$1,000,000
I I
( $1,700,000 I
I I
S
I
8,513,100 1
I
I
STATE GRANTS
1
I I
1 S 360,000 1
I I
I
S 185,000 I
1
I
I
I
I I
I I
l 1
S
I
545,000 1
L
I
I MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPT
I I
1 $1,525,660 J
I
$ 642,500 1
i
$ 274,560 1
S 150,000
I I
1$ 150,000 1
I
$2,742,720 i
I
FEDERAL
I
GRANTS
I I
1 $ 576,980 1
L l
I
S 200,000 I
1
I
I
I
I I
1 I
I 1
S
i
776,980 1
1
I
SPECIAL
I
ASSESSMENTS
I I
i S 678,290 1
I I
I
$1,269,100 1
I
I
S 546,500 (
I
5 478,650
I I
1 5 50,000 1
I I
S
I
3,022,540 1
1
I
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT SALES
i I
TAX 1 54,600,000 1
I
$2,000,000 I
I
I
I I
1 I
S
I
6,600,000 1
I
1 OTHER
1
I I
1$ 432,000 1$
I 1
I
182,000 1
1
I
$ 182,000 1
I
S 212,000
I I
1$ 182,000 1$
I I
I
1,190,000 1
I
I
1 TOTALS
1
I I
1$ 9,453,130 1
I 1
1
$ 7,012,6901
I
I
$3,226,870 1
I
$1,965,650
I I
1 $2,157,000 1
I I
I
$23,815,340 i
I
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I
EXPENDITURES 1992-1997 BY PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND SOURCE OF FUNDS I
I GENERAL IGENERAL I REVENUE I IMOTOR FUEL I I I CAPITAL I I I
PROGRAM I FUND 10BLIGAT.1 BONDS/ I STATE I TAX I FEDERAL I SPECIAL IIMPROVEMENTI I I
1DESCRIPTIONI REVENUES I BONDS I PFA I GRANTS j RECEIPTS I GRANTS (ASSESSMENT I SALES TAX I OTHER I TOTAL I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
ITRANSPORT. I I IS 300,000 1 1$2,742,720 IS 576,980 1$2,201,140 1$1,200,000 1 1$ 7,020,8401
I I I I I I j I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
1ENVIRONMENTI I IS 7,613,1001$ 545,0001 1$ 200,000 1$ 821,400 1$5,400,000 1$1,160,000 1$15,739,5001
1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I
IRECREATION I I I I I I I I I I I
1 AND 1$ 375,000 1 I I I I i I 1$ 30,000 1$ 405,0001
1 LEISURE 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I
I I I I I I I I I i I I
ICOMMUNITY IS 50,000 1 1$ 600,000 1 I I I I I 1$ 650,0001
1DEVELOPMEMTI I I I I I I I I I I
I I I i I I I I I I I I
I TOTALS 1$ 425,0001 IS 8,513,1001$ 545,000 1$2,742,720 IS 776,980 1$3,022,540 1$6,600,000 1$1,190,000 1$23,815,3401
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
IX
Summary of Funding Sources
Capital Improvement Budget
REVENUE/PFA
BONDS 36%
STATE
GRANTS/LIGAN S 2%
MOTOR FUEL
TAX RECEIPT 125%
rsaasa���rr �•-GENERAL
Thr~
F 2- FUND REVENUES 22
VX\N7
W;:L NO
SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS 13%
GAP IMP
OTHER SALES TAX 213%
5%
Capital Improvement Budget
By Program Area
ENVIRONMENT
667
xi
lly
MENT 3%
TRANS PO RTATIO N
29%
ION
AND LEISURE 2%
Transportation
Cacpzt al Improvement Budget
-4,000.400
3,ODD,ODO
z,000,00a
1,ODD,ODa
a
1992-93 1993-94 1934-95 1995-98 1996-97
ka.
FA
TRANSPORTATION
I
I
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
I
IPROJECTI
1
1 1992-93 1
1993-94
1
1994-95
1 1995-96
1 1996-97
INUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
I
TOTAL COST
I FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR
I
FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR
( FISCAL YEAR j
I I
11-1 I
Lexington
I
I $1,600,000
I I
I $1,000,000 I$
600,000
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
J j
Street
I
I
E,G
1 E,G I
I 1
E,G
I
I
I
1
I I
j I
I I
1 1-2 1
Sprigg Street
I
I$
502,640
I I
1$ 502,640 I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
Bridge
1
I
E,F
1 E,F I
1 i
I
j
I
I
I I
I I
1 1-3 1
Street Overlay
1 S
750,000
i$ 150,000 1
S 150,000
1$
150,000
1$ 150,000
I S 150,000 I
I i
I
E
I E I
E
I
E
I E
I E I
I I
1 1-4 I
Clark
I
1$
227,500
I I
I I
I
I$
227,500
I
I
I I
I I
I i
l t
Avenue
I
t
G
I I
1 t
I
1
G
I
t
I I
! 1
I I
311 Asphalt
I
I I
I
I
I I
1 1-5 1
Paving
i$
200,000
1 1$
50,000
1$
50,000
1$ 50,000 i$
50,000 I
I I
I I
Program
1
l
G
I I
J I
G
I
t
G
I G I
l t
G I
1
1 1-6 I
North Sprigg
I$
650,000
1$ 300,000 I$
350,000
I
I I
I
I I
I I
Extension
1
I
E,G
I E 1
I I
E,G
I
I
I I
! I
I
I
I I
1 1-7 I
Silver Springs
I
I$
500,000
I I
1 I$
I
500,000 I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
Road
I
G
I I
G I
I I
I
( j
Extension
1 1-8 I
Whitener St.
I$
24,790
1$ 24,790 I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
1
G
i G I
I I
I
I
I I
( 1
I
L
I I
1 1- 9 1
Good Hope
I
1$
38,720
I I
I I
I
I$
38,720
I I
( I
I
I
I I
J t
Bridge
I
1
E
I I
1 1
I
I
E
I I
I t
I
l
1 1-10 (
Morgan Oak
I$
32,540
I I
I$
32,540
I I
I
I I
J t
Bridge
i
t
E
I I
I I
I
I
E
I I
I 1
I
I
I i
11-11 (
North Main
I
I S
53,300
I I
I I
I
I
S
53,300
I I
I I
I
I
I I
1 1
Widening
I
t
E
J
I I
I
I
I
E
I I
I I
I
t
I I
1 1-12 1
Mt. Auburn
I
1$
387,000
I I
1$ 30,000 1
I
1$
176,300
I I
i$ 180,700 I
I
I
I I
1 1
Extension
I
1
G
I G I
t l
I
I
G
I G I
I t
I
I
FA
TRANSPORTATION
PROPOSED PROJECTS
IPROJECTI 1
1 I I
1 1992-93
J
( 1993-94
1
1 1994-95
I
1995-96 1
I I
1996-97
I
(NUMBER
I IMPROVEMENT ITEM I
TOTAL COST
( FISCAL YEAR
1 FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
11-13
1 Lorimier I
S
200,350
I S 20,000
I
I S 78,600
I S 101,750 I
1
I
a
i Extension I
1 !
G
1 G
1
I
I
I G
1
I G I
I I
I
I
I
11-14
i I
( Flood Project I
S
1,200,000
I
( $1,200,000
I
I
I I
I
I
1
1 Bridges I
! 1
H
1 H
I
I
I
1
I
I I
1 I
I
I
!
11-15
I I
I Jasmine Lane I
S
52,000
I
I S 52,000
I
I
1
I
! I
I I
I
I
I
J
i I
I I
G
I G
!
l
I
1 I
I
I
i 1-16
I I
( Magnolia I
S
50,300
I
I S 50,300
I
1
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
1
I Avenue 1
I I
G
I G
l
I
1
I
I
I I
I i
I
I
I
1 1-17
I I
1 Dixie Blvd. I
S
51,700
I
I S 51,700
I
I
I
I
I I
! I
I
I
i
1
i I
1 I
G
I G
l
I
l
i l
i
11-18
I Airport Yater I
S
500,000
I S 250,000
I S 250,000
I I
I
I
I
I
I System I
1 I
C, F
1 C, F
1
I C, F
I
I I
I I
I
1
I
I
I
I
!
I I
I TOTALS I
! I
S
7,020,840
I
I $3,631,430
I
I
i $1,900,000
I
I I
I S 806,960 I
I I
i
S 482,450 I
I
I
S 200,000 1
I
I
I
1
I I
I i
I I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I i
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
l
I A
I GENERAL FUND
I B
I GEN. OBL. FUNDS I
I
I I
I
I
I
I C
I REV/PFA BONDS I
S
300,000
I S 150,000
I S 150,000 I
I
I
I
I D
1 STATE GRANTS, LOANSI
I E
I MOTOR FUEL TAX I
S
2,742,720
( S 1,525,660
I S 642,500 I
S 274,560 I
S 150,000 I
S 150,000 1
I F
I FED. GRANTS, LOANS I
S
576,980
I S 476,980
I S 100,000 !
I
I
I
I G
I SPEC. ASSESSMENTS I
S
2,201,140
I S 278,790
I S 1,007,500 I
S 532,400 (
S 332,450 I
S 50,000 I
I H
I CAP. IMP. SALES TAXI
S
1,200,000
1 S 1,200,000
1 I
(
I
I
I I
1 OTHER
I
I I
! 1
I
I
1
l
3.
PROJECT TITLE: LEXINGTON STREET
LOCATION: KINGSHIGHWAY TO ROUTE 177
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEXINGTON AS
AN ARTERIAL STREET RUNNING EAST AND WEST
ACROSS THE NORTH PART OF THE CITY.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 17,424 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE AND ASPHALT
PAVEMENT 44 FEET WIDE WITH CURBS.
CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE OVER CAPE LACROIX CREEK.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY TRAFFIC
FLOW EAST/WEST THROUGH THE NORTH PART OF THE
CITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $1,300,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$ 300,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
m
PROJECT TITLE: SPRIGG STREET PHASE III
LOCATION: SPRIGG STREET
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE CAPE LA
CROIX BRIDGE AT SOUTH SPRIGG STREET.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 110 LINEAR FOOT TWO-LANE BRIDGE
AND APPROACHES.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY
JUSTIFICATION: BRIDGE IS FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE, NEARING
STRUCTURAL OBSOLESCENCE. IT SERVES SEVERAL
MAJOR INDUSTRIES AND WILL SERVE THE WASTE
TRANSFER SITE FOR THE CITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $125,660 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$376,980 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
5.
PROJECT TITLE: STREET OVERLAY
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
PURPOSE: PROVIDES FOR CONTINUING MAJOR STREET
MAINTENANCE PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FOR THE
OVERLAY OF 7 MILES OF LOCAL AND COLLECTOR
ASPHALT STREETS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: MILLING OR OTHER SURFACE PROFILING METHOD AND
ASPHALT OVERLAY.
UNIT OF WORK: CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: COST EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE TO PREVENT NEED FOR
FUTURE RECONSTRUCTION OF ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $750,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
MR
PROJECT TITLE: CLARK AVENUE
LOCATION: FROM LOMBARDO DRIVE TO MARIETTA STREET
PURPOSE: TO PAVE A SECTION OF STREET PREVIOUSLY
PLATTED.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVING APPROXIMATELY 1640 FEET FROM LOMBARDO
DRIVE TO MARIETTA STREET WITH ASSOCIATED
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: WILL CONNECT TWO ENDS OF CLARK STREET,
PROVIDING A SUB -COLLECTOR ROUTE NORTH AND
SOUTH.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $227,500 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
7.
PROJECT TITLE: 3" ASPHALT PAVING PROGRAM
LOCATION: VARIOUS CITY STREETS
PURPOSE: TO SURFACE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL GRAVEL
STREETS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: TWENTY FOOT (201) WIDE HOT MIX ASPHALTIC
CONCRETE SURFACING ON EXISTING GRAVEL STREET
BASE WHERE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE CAN BE ASSURED.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REDUCE GRAVEL STREET MAINTENANCE COSTS.
ENHANCE NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: REMOVAL OF APPROXIMATELY 7 MILES OF GRAVEL
STREETS WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE COSTS OF
GRADING AND ROCK REPLACEMENT.
FINANCING: $200,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
Elm
PROJECT TITLE: NORTH SPRIGG EXTENSION
LOCATION: NORTH SPRIGG STREET
PURPOSE: PROVIDE A NORTH -SOUTH LINK FOR VARIOUS EAST -
WEST ARTERIAL STREETS TO THE DOWNTOWN AREA.
EXTEND NORTH SPRIGG FROM BERTLING TO CONNECT
WITH THE LEXINGTON/MELODY LANE ARTERIAL.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 4,150 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT
PAVEMENT, 44 FEET WIDE WITH CURBS.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY FLOW OF
TRAFFIC IN THE COMMUNITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $200,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$450,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX (E)
No
PROJECT TITLE: SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
LOCATION: SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR THE CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF
SILVER SPRINGS ROAD AS A COLLECTOR STREET.
CONSTRUCTION NORTH FROM ROUTE K TO THE
COMPLETED SECTION SOUTH OF INDEPENDENCE.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 2,100 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT
PAVEMENT 40 FEET WIDE WITH CURBS.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: TO EXTEND PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY
TRAFFIC FLOW.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $500,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
10.
PROJECT TITLE: WHITENER STREET
LOCATION: FROM WESTERLY END TO SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT 30 FOOT WIDE PAVEMENT WITH
CURBS AND DRAINAGE APPROXIMATELY 200' LONG.
UNIT OF WORK: CONSTRUCTION
JUSTIFICATION: CONNECTION TO SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NEEDED FOR
EMERGENCY VEHICLE AND OTHER ACCESS TO DENSELY
DEVELOPED MULTI -FAMILY AREA.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 24,790 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
11.
PROJECT TITLE: GOOD HOPE/FOUNTAIN BRIDGE REMOVAL
LOCATION: INTERSECTION OF GOODHOPE AND FOUNTAIN
PURPOSE: REPLACEMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: DEMOLISH STRUCTURE, FILL ACROSS FOUNTAIN
AND REPLACE GOOD HOPE PAVEMENT. PROTECT
ADJACENT SANITARY SEWER.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: USE OF BRIDGES BY RAILROAD HAS BEEN ABANDONED.
AGE OF BRIDGES AND DETERIORATION REQUIRE
ACTION TO MAINTAIN SAFETY OF GOOD HOPE.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 38,720 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
12.
PROJECT TITLE: MORGAN OAK/FOUNTAIN BRIDGE REMOVAL
LOCATION: INTERSECTION OF MORGAN OAK AND FOUNTAIN
PURPOSE: REPLACEMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: DEMOLISH STRUCTURE, FILL ACROSS FOUNTAIN
AND REPLACE MORGAN OAK PAVEMENT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: USE OF BRIDGES BY RAILROAD HAS BEEN ABANDONED.
AGE OF BRIDGES AND DETERIORATION REQUIRE
ACTION TO MAINTAIN SAFETY OF MORGAN OAK.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 32,540 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
13.
PROJECT TITLE: N. MAIN STREET WIDENING
LOCATION: FROM MILL STREET TO MASON STREET
E�iuli��� 11N141*alyoIfpcolz1
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REDUCE THE DEGREE OF CURVATURE OF NORTH MAIN
AT MILL AND WIDEN PAVEMENT FROM MILL TO
MASON STREET TO 381, MODIFY DRAINAGE, OVERLAY
ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: IMPROVE TRAFFIC FLOW AND SAFETY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 53,300 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
14.
PROJECT TITLE: MT. AUBURN EXTENSION
LOCATION: FROM BLOOMFIELD SOUTH TO PROPOSED MO HWY 74
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVING WITH CURBS AND DRAINAGE 44' WIDE
APPROXIMATELY
UNIT OF WORK: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION
JUSTIFICATION: TO CONNECT MT. AUBURN, A WEST SIDE ARTERIAL
STREET, WITH THE PROPOSED MO HWY 74
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 387,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
15.
PROJECT TITLE: LORIMIER STREET EXTENSION
LOCATION: FROM MORGAN OAK SOUTH TO PROPOSED MO
HWY 74
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVING WITH CURBS 40 FEET WIDE APPROXIMATELY
1925 LINEAL FEET
UNIT OF WORK: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: TO PROVIDE A DIRECT ACCESS FROM THE
PROPOSED MO HWY 74 TO THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS
DISTRICT OF THE CITY
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 200,350 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
16.
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - FLOOD PROJECT
THEMIS ST.
MERRIWTHER ST.
GOOD HOPE
ARBY'S BRIDGE
BESSIE ST.
MARIETTA ST.
LINDA ST.
BLOOMFIELD ST.
REPLACEMENT
( REALIGNMENT )
REMOVE AND REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
FLOOD CONTROL
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$1,200,0000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SALES TAX(H)
17.
PROJECT TITLE: JASMINE LANE
LOCATION: RAMPART TO FLAD
PURPOSE: TO UPGRADE EXISTING ROAD AND OPEN NEW ROAD
FOR ACCESS
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVE TO HIGH TYPE STANDARDS APPROXIMATELY
606 LINEAL FEET, 30' WIDE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PETITION REQUEST OF PROPERTY OWNERS APPROVED
BY CITY COUNCIL.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 52,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
E"
PROJECT TITLE: MAGNOLIA AVE.
LOCATION: RAMPART TO FLAD
PURPOSE: TO UPGRADE EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVE TO HIGH TYPE STANDARDS APPROXIMATELY
606 LINEAL FEET, 30 FEET WIDE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PETITION REQUEST OF PROPERTY OWNERS APPROVED
BY CITY COUNCIL.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 50,300 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
19.
PROJECT TITLE: DIXIE BOULEVARD
LOCATION: MAGNOLIA TO JASMINE
PURPOSE: UPGRADE EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVE TO HIGH TYPE STANDARDS APPROXIMATELY
644 LINEAL FEET, 301 WIDE
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PETITION REQUEST OF PROPERTY OWNERS APPROVED
BY CITY COUNCIL.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 51,700 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
20.
PROJECT TITLE: WATER SYSTEM
LOCATION: CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: TO FACILITATE FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITIES
AND INCREASE POTABLE WATER ACCESS FOR FUTURE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF A 100,000 GALLON WATER STORAGE
FACILITY AND INSTALLATION OF MAINS, HYDRANTS,
AND WELL CHLORINATION.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: TO INSURE PROPERTY FIRE PROTECTION FOR AIRPORT
AND SURROUNDING INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $200,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$300,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
`w
Environment
Capital Improvement Budget
6,250.400
5,000.400
3,750.400
2,500.400
1,250.400
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97
22.
23.
ENVIRONMENT
I
I
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
I
(PROJECT)
1
1
1992-93 1
1993-94 1
1994-95 f
1995-96 1
1996-97 I
(NUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM I
TOTAL COST
( FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR j
FISCAL YEAR I
I I
1 2-1 1
I
Cape LaCroix - (
$5,000,000
I i
I 53,000,000 (
I
$2,000,000 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f j
Walker Creek I
H
I
H I
H I
I
I
I
1 I
Flood Control l
I
l
I
I
I
I
I I
1 2-2 j
I
Upper Cape La 1
$2,425,000
I I
I 51,050,000 I
I
$1,375,000 I
I
1
I
I
i
I
I i
Croix - Phase IV I
C,D,F
I
C,D,F f
C,D,F I
I
I
I
I j
Trunk Sewers
I I
1 2-3 I
i
S. Kingshighway I
S
110,000
I
I S
I
20,000 I
I
S 90,000 1
i
I
I
I
I
I
I I
J I
Sewer I
I
G
I
j
G I
I
G I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
1 2-4 I
I
N. Kingshighway I
S
285,000
I
( $
I
285,000 I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
Sewer I
I
C, G
I
I
C, G I
1
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
1
I I
12-5 I
I
Walker Branch I
S
400,000
I
I S
I
400,000 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I I
J I
Sewer I
j
H
I
I
H I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
l
i I
1 2-6 1
I
Belleridge Sewers I
S
242,600
I
I S
I
242,600 I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I I
1 I
Phase I& II I
I
G
I
1
G I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
l
I I
1 2-7 I
I
Gerhardt Lift I
$
33,500
I
I $
I
6,900 I
I
S 26,600 I
I
f
i
I
I
I
I I
Station I
G
I
G I
G
J I
Intercepter
I I
2-8 I
i
Sloan Creek 1
S
461,000
I
I
I
I
I
$ 41,000 1
i
S 420,000 I
I
I
I
f
I I
I
Sewer Extension i
i
C
I
l
I
I
C I
I
C I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
1 2-9 I
I
Lakeshore Drive I
S
160,300
i
I
I
I
I
1
i
S 14,100 I
I
$ 146,200 f
I
I
I I
I
Sewer I
I
G
I
I
I
1
I
I
G I
I
G I
!
I
I
I I
12-10 I
I
Infiltration and I
S
910,000
I
I S
I
182,000 I
I
S 182,000 I
I
S 182,000 I.
i
S 182,000 I
I
S 182,000 I
I I
I I
Inflow Program (
I
I
I
I
I I
1
I I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
1 2-11 1
I
Clark Avenue I
S
471,000
i
1
I
I
I
$ 94,200 I
i
S 376,800 1
I
1
I
I
I I
J I
Relief I
I
C
I
i
I
I
C I
I
C I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
2-12 I
I
Outfall Relief I
S
201,000
I
I $
I
40,200 I
I
S 160,800 1
I
l
I
l
I
I
I I
I
C
I
C i
C I
I
I
I
I I
12-13 I
I
West Side Relief 1
S
940,100
I
I
I
I
I
S 188,090 I
I
S 752,010 I
I
I
I
I
I I
J I
Sewer I
I
C
I
I
I
1
C I
l
C
l
I
I
23.
24.
ENVIRONMENT
I
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
I
I
IPROJECTI
1
1 1992-93 1
1993-94 1
1994-95
1 1995-96
1 1996-97 i
NUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
I TOTAL COST
I FISCAL YEAR 1
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR
1 FISCAL YEAR
1 FISCAL YEAR 1
I I
1 2-14 1
Evergreen Sewer
I
I S 145,000
I I
1 I
I
S 145,000 I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
District
I G
1
I I
I 1
G I
1
I
I
I I
I l
I I
` 2-15 I
Landfill
I
I S 550,000
I I
I $ 20,000 I
I
S 30,000 I
S 50,000
I
1 5 250,000
I I
I S 200,000
I I
1 1
Expansion
1 I
I
I I 1
i I
I 1
I
I
1 I
I
1 I
1 1
I I
1 2-16 1
Pneumatic Lime
I
I S 600,000
I I
I S 75,000 I
I
S 525,000 I
I
I
I I
( I
I I
Add. Station
I C
I C I
C I
I
I I
I i
1 2-17 1
College/Henderson
I
1 $2,600,000
I I
I S 400,000 1
I
I
S 550,000
I
I S 750,000
I I
1 5 900,000 1
I I
J I
Sewer Segregation
1 I,C,D
I
I D,I I
I 1
I
I
C
I C
I !
I C I
I
I I
1 2-18 1
Recycling
I
I $ 180,000
I I
i 1$
I
180,000 I
I
I 1
I I
I
I I
Center
I C
I I
C
i I
1 2-19 I
TRANSFER STATION
I
1 5 25,000
I I
I $ 25,000 1
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
i I
J 1
ACCESS RD.
( I
I
I I I
t l
(
1
1 I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
TOTALS
I
I
1 $15,739,500
I
I
I I
I I
1 $5,746,700 1
I I
I I
i
I
$5,037,690 1
I
I
52,344,910
I I
I I
i $1,328,200 1
I I
I 1
I
I
$1,282,000
I
L
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I i
I I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I A 1
GENERAL FUNDS
(
I I
I
I I
I
1 8 1
GEN. OBL. FUNDS
I C 1
REV/PFA BONDS
I S 7,613,100
1 $1,055,200 1
$2,309,090 1
$2,148,810
i $1,000,000 1
$1,100,000
I D 1
STATE GRANTS/LOANS
I S 545,000
I S 360,000 I
S 185,000
E I
MOTOR FUEL TAX
I F 1
FED. GRANTS/LOANS
i S 200,000
1$ 100,000 I
S 100,000 I
I I
I
I G I
SPEC. ASSESSMENTS
I S 821,400
I $ 399,500 I
S 261,600 I
S 14,100
I S 146,200 I
I H 1
CAP IMP SALES TAX
I $ 5,400,000
1 $3,400,000 1
$2,000,000
l I I
OTHER
I S 1,160,000
I S 432,000 1
5 182,000 I
$ 182,000
I S 182,000 I
S 182,000
I i
I I
I I
i 1
I
I
i
I
I i
I I
I I
I 1
I
I
I
i
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I
I
I
l
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
1 !
I
1
I
I
I I
I I
I I
1 1
I
I
I
I
24.
PROJECT TITLE: CAPE LA CROIX - WALKER BRANCH
FLOOD CONTROL
LOCATION: CAPE LA CROIX AND WALKER CREEKS
PURPOSE: TO REDUCE FLOODING
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: THREE MILES CHANNELIZATION; 157 ACRE
DETENTION FACILITY; PARKS AND
RECREATION FACILITIES
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY,
AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: FLOODING IN THE CAPE LA CROIX-WALKER
CREEK WATERSHED IS CREATING SERIOUS
DAMAGE TO PROPERTY AND ENDANGERS THE
LIVES OF CAPE GIRARDEAU CITIZENS
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL AND MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT PER YEAR WILL BE REQUIRED
FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF THESE
FACILITIES.
FINANCING: $5,000,000* CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
SALES TAX (H)
*INCLUDES REMAINING LOCAL SPONSOR SHARE ONLY. BRIDGE RELOCATIONS
REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT ARE SHOWN IN TRANSPORTATION SECTION.
25.
PROJECT TITLE: UPPER CAPE LA CROIX - PHASE IV
LOCATION: RT. W TO SAN DANGARO SUBDIVISION,
GOLF COURSE, AND CORPS DETENTION AREA
PURPOSE: TO EXTEND SEWER SERVICE TO NORTHWEST
PART OF CITY.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 4.5
MILES OF SANITARY TRUNK SEWERS
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: EXTENDS CITY SEWER SERVICES IN
NORTHWEST PART OF CITY AND WOULD
ELIMINATE FOUR SEWAGE LAGOONS AND
TWO PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASED DEPRECIATION EXPENSE.
FINANCING: $ 370,000 STATE GRANTS (D)
$ 200,000 CORPS OF ENGINEERS (F)
$1,855,000 REV BOND/SEWER FEES (C)
26.
PROJECT TITLE: S. KINGSHIGHWAY SEWER
LOCATION: BOTH SIDES OF HWY 61 SOUTH FROM
SOUTHERN EXPRESSWAY
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 1680
FEET OF SANITARY SEWER AND
APPURTENANCES
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REPLACEMENT OF SEPTIC SYSTEMS IN
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
AREAS. SOIL CONDITIONS ARE POORLY
SUITED TO SEPTIC SYSTEMS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 110,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
27.
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
NORTH KINGSHIGHWAY SEWER
NORTH KINGSHIGHWAY
NEW CONSTRUCTION
2800 FEET OF 8' SANITARY SEWER;
2100 FEET OF 27" SANITARY SEWER
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
INCREASE DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
$ 130,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$ 155,000 REVENUE BONDS/SEWER
FEES (C)
28.
PROJECT TITLE: WALKER BRANCH SEWER RELOCATIONS
LOCATION: VARIOUS BETWEEN PERRYVILLE RD AND
JUNCTURE OF CAPE LA CROIX CREEK
PURPOSE: RELOCATION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF VARIOUS
SEGMENTS OF SANITARY SEWER
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REQUIRED IN CONJUNCTION WITH FLOOD
CONTROL PROJECT
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 400,000 1/2 CENT CAP IMPROVEMENT
SALES TAX.(H)
29.
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
BELLERIDGE SEWERS PHASES I & II
BELLERIDGE SEWERS PHASES I & II
NEW CONSTRUCTION
APPROXIMATELY 6800 LINEAR FEET OF 8"
SEWER WITH WYES AND MANHOLES
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
REPLACE INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS
WITH CITY SANITARY SEWER
INCREASE DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
$ 242,600 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
30.
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
GERHARDT LIFT STATION INTERCEPTER
FROM ACESS STREET TO SOUTHERN
EXPRESSWAY
NEW CONSTRUCTION
APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET OF SANITARY
SEWER, ELIMINATING THE GERHARDT LIFT
STATION
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
REDUCE MAINTENANCE COST OF SEWER
SYSTEM, ELIMINATE A FEW RESIDENTIAL
AND COMMERCIAL SEPTIC TANKS
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$ 33,500 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
31.
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
SLOAN CREEK SEWER EXTENSION
FROM BERTLING TO LEXINGTON
NEW CONSTRUCTION
EXTENSION OF SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LINE
APPROXIMATELY 4500 FEET
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND HEALTH
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$ 461,000 REVENUE BOND/SEWER FEES (C)l
32.
PROJECT TITLE: LAKESHORE DRIVE SANITARY SEWER
LOCATION: LAKESHORE DRIVE
PURPOSE: REPLACE OLD EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEMS
WITH A NEW SANITARY SEWER
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 4780 FEET OF 8" SANITARY SEWER WITH
40 WYE CONNECTIONS
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PUBLIC HEALTH
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 160,300 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
33.
PROJECT TITLE: INFILTRATION AND INFLOW PROGAM
LOCATION: VARIOUS
PURPOSE: MAJOR REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF
DETERIORATING INFRASTRUCTURE IN
SEWER SYSTEM
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: INVESTIGATE AND ANALYZE COLLECTION
SYSTEM FOR INFLOW AND INFILTRATION
AND TAKE CORRECTIVE MEASURES TO LIMIT
UNIT OF WORK: DATA COLLECTION, ENGINEERING, REPAIR,
CONSTRUCTION
JUSTIFICATION: RECLAIM SANITARY SEWER CAPACITY AND
REDUCE OPERATION COSTS OF TREATMENT
PLANT TREATING STORM AND GROUND WATER
ELIMINATE SURCHARGING AND BUILDING
SEWER BACK-UPS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$ 910,000 SEWER REVENUES (I)
34.
PROJECT TITLE: CLARK AVENUE RELIEF
LOCATION: ALONG WALKER BRANCH FROM HOWELL ST.
TO PARKSITE DR.
PURPOSE: RELIEF LINE
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 5000 FEET OF 15"
DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER LINE
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: RELIEVE EXISTING OVERLOAD AND PERMIT
COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DRAINAGE
BASIN.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 471,000 REV. BOND/SEWER FEE (C)
35.
PROJECT TITLE: OUTFALL RELIEF SEWER
LOCATION: IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM OF WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT
PURPOSE: RELIEF LINE
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 550 FEET OF 36"
DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER LINE
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: ALLOW THE PLANT TO ACCEPT THE FULL
PUMPING CAPACITY OF THE FOUR LIFT
STATIONS ALONG THE MISSISSIPPI,
REDUCING WET WEATHER BYPASSES AT
THOSE POINTS
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 201,000 REV.BONDS/SEWER FEES (C)
36.
PROJECT TITLE: WEST SIDE RELIEF SEWER
LOCATION: SOUTH OF BRINK SUBDIVISION ALONG
CAPE LA CROIX CREEK TO WEST END BLVD.
PURPOSE: RELIEF LINE AND REPLACEMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REPLACE A SEGMENT OF 21" DIAMETER
PIPE WITH 36" DIAMETER PIPE
APPROXIMATELY 5000 FEET
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: RELIEVE UPSTREAM SURCHARGING PROBLEMS
AND PROVIDE CAPACITY FOR FUTURE GROWTH
GENERATED BY THE EXTENSION OF UPSTREAM
TRUNK LINES
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 940,100 REV BONDS/SEWER FEES (C)
37.
PROJECT TITLE: EVERGREEN SEWER DISTRICT
LOCATION: EVERGREEN DRIVE AREA
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 3400 FEET OF 8" SANITARY SEWER;
2095 FEET OF 6" SANITARY SEWER
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PUBLIC HEALTH AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASE DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
FINANCING: $ 145,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
38.
PROJECT TITLE: LANDFILL EXPANSION
LOCATION: LANDFILL
PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE LAND FOR NECESSARY
EXPANSION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: ACQUIRE AND DEVELOP SPACE TO MEET
PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR A RESERVE
LANDFILL.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, LAND ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION
JUSTIFICATION: CURRENT LANDFILL SITE NEAR CAPACITY
RESERVE LANDFILL WILL BE NEEDED ON
CONTINUING BASIS TO GO WITH RECYCLING
AND TRANSFER STATION OPERATIONS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT; FAILURE TO
COMPLETE THIS PROJECT COULD RESULT IN
SIGNIFICANT OPERATING COST INCREASES.
FINANCING: $ 550,000 SOLID WASTE FUND REV (I)
Kvp
PROJECT TITLE: PNEUMATIC LIME ADDITION STATION
LOCATION: WASTEWATER PLANT
PURPOSE: TO MEET EPA REQUIREMENTS FOR SLUDGE
DISPOSAL.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: INSTALL EQUIPMENT TO -APPLY LIME TO
SLUDGE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: TO KILL PATHOGENIC BACTERIA IN THE
CITY SLUDGE. THE PRESENT REGULATIONS
REQUIRE THIS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: ADDED COSTS WILL OCCUR FOR
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE AND LIME IN THE
TREATMENT PLANT OPERATIONS.
FINANCING: $ 600,000 REVENUE BONDS/SEWER FEES
(C)
40.
PROJECT TITLE: COLLEGE/HENDERSON SEWER SEGREGATION
LOCATION: SEWER DISTRICT 5
PURPOSE: RECONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: SEGREGATION OF COMBINED STORM AND
SANITARY SEWERS DOWNSTREAM OF ALL
STORMWATER INLETS
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERNS, COMPLIANCE
WITH EPA STORMWATER QUALITY, AND
WITH MISSOURI DNR AND EPA CSO
REGULATIONS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: WILL REDUCE OPERATING COST BY
ELIMINATING GRIT/PUMPING STATION,
BUT WILL ADD DEPRECIATION EXPENSE.
FINANCING: $2,200,000 REV. BONDS/SEWER FEES (C)
$ 175,000 STATE GRANTS/LOANS (D)
$ 225,000 OTHER (I)
41.
PROJECT TITLE: RECYCLING BUILDING
LOCATION: 120 N. BROADVIEW ST.
PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE AND
SORTING ROOM FOR RECYCLING OPERATIONS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT 10,000 FOOT STEEL BUILDING
LOCATED ON N.W. CORNER OF THE WEST
PUBLIC WORKS LOT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: BUILDING WILL PROVIDE PRESENT AND
EXPANDING NEEDS OF THE RECYLING
PROGRAM.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASE IN MAINTENANCE AND
UTILITIES.
FINANCING: $ 180,000 PFA REV BONDS/SOLID
WASTE FEES (C)
42.
PROJECT TITLE: ACCESS ROAD TO TRANSFER STATION
LOCATION: TRANSFER STATION, SOUTH SPRIGG ST.
PURPOSE: NEW ACCESS TO TRANSFER STATION.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: HARD SURFACE ASPHALT ROAD TO TRANSFER
STATION FROM SOUTH SPRIGG PER EASEMENT
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION: TO KEEP EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL AWAY
FROM LONE STAR ENTRANCE AND EQUIPMENT.
GREATER SAFETY AND EASIER ACCESS FOR
PUBLIC.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$ 25,000 OTHER (I)
43.
Recreation & Leisure
Capital -Improvement Budget
110.400
140.400
90.400
80.400
70.400
60.400
7942-93 1993-94 1994--95 1995-98 1996-97
44.
45.
RECREATION
AND
LEISURE
I
I
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
I
j
IPROJECTI
1
1 1992-93 I
1993-94
(
1994-95
(
1995-96
(
1996-97
1NUMBER
I IMPROVEMENT ITEM
I TOTAL COST
! FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL
YEAR
I
FISCAL YEAR
I
FISCAL YEAR
I
( 3-1
I
1 Capaha Park
I
I S
75,000
I i
( (
I
I S
25,000
I
( S
20,000
I
( S
i
30,000
(
I Shelter, Courts
I
A
( (
I
A
I
A
I
A
J
1& Playground
I
( 3-2
I
I Bandshell
I
I S
45,000
I I
I I
I
I
I
( S
45,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Seating
I
I
I
A,I
I I
1 I
I
I
I
(
A,I
I
(
I
I
I
3-3
I
I Arena Park
I
( S
25,000
I I
I I
S
25,000
I
I
I
I
I
(
i
I
I
I
I Shelter
i
(
I
A
( 1
i I
A
(
I
I
l
I
j
1
I
( 3-4
i
( Land
I
I S
125,000
I I
( S 25,000 I
S
25,000
I
I S
25,000
i
( S
25,000
I
( S
I
25,000 1
I
i
I Acquisition
I
1
I
A
( A (
I I
A
I
l
A
I
j
A
I
I
A 1
j
I
13-5
I
I Pool Bubble
I
I S
65,000
I I
( S 50,000 I
S
15,000
I
I
I
(
I
I
I
I
(
J
( Replacement
I
I
j
A
( A I
I I
A
I
I
(
I
(
I
I
I
I
1 3-6
I
I Miscellaneous
I
( S
70,000
I I
I I
S
10,000
I
( S
25,000
I
I S
15,000
I
I S
I
20,000
I
J
I Projects
I
(
I
A
I I
I I
I
I
A
I
1
A
I
1
A I
1
i
I
I
1
I
1 TOTALS
I
I
I
( S
I
1
405,000
i I
( S 75,000 I
I I
I 1
S
75,000
i
( S
I
l
75,000
I
I S
I
I
105,000
I
I S
I
L
I
75,000 1
I
1
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
1
L
I I
I I
I I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
( A
I GENERAL FUNDS
( S
375,000
( S 75,000 I
S
75,000
( S
75,000
( S
75,000
I $
75,000
( B
I GEN. OBL. FUNDS
I
I 1
1
I
I
I
( C
( REV/PFA BONDS
I
I 1
I
1
1
1
( D
1 STATE GRANTS/LOANS
I
I I
I
I
I
I
( E
I MOTOR FUEL TAX
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I F
I FED. GRANTS/LOANS
I
I I
I
I
I
I
( G
1 SPEC. ASSESSMENTS
I
I I
1
1
1
1
( H
I CAP IMP SALES TAX
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I OTHER
I S
30,000
I 1
1
I S
30,000
(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
45.
PROJECT TITLE: CAPAHA SHELTER, COURTS, & PLAYGROUND
LOCATION: CAPAHA PARK - NORTHEAST CORNER
PURPOSE: REPLACE TWO DETERIORATED SHELTERS
WITH ONE LARGE SHELTER; UPGRADE
BASKETBALL COURT AND PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF LARGE SHELTER,
30' X 601, AND INSTALL LARGE PLAY-
GROUND UNIT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REDESIGN PARK AREA TO PROVIDE BETTER
PICNIC AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 75,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A)
46.
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
BANDSHELL SEATING
CAPAHA PARK
PROVIDE ADEQUATE SEATING FOR
BANDSHELL SPECTATORS
INSTALL SEATING, CONCRETE APRON
AND WALKWAYS, NEW LIGHTING, AND
RELOCATE POWER CONTROL SOURCE
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: MUNICIPAL BAND ATTRACTS 300-500
SPECTATORS EACH WEEK DURING SUMMER
MONTHS. PRESENT SEATING IS
INADEQUATE.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
$ 30,000 DONATION (I)
15,000 GENERAL FUND (A)
47.
PROJECT TITLE: ARENA PARK SHELTERS
LOCATION: ARENA PARK
PURPOSE: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PICNIC FACILITIES
AND REPLACE OLD SHELTER.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF PARK SHELTER RANGING
IN SIZE FROM 20' X 20' TO 30' X 60'
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: OLD SHELTER DETERIORATED AND DOES
NOT FIT NEW DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 25,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A)
PROJECT TITLE: LAND ACQUISITION
LOCATION: SHAWNEE PARK
PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL GREEN SPACE
AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PURCHASE OF 39 ACRES OF LAND
UNIT OF WORK: LAND PURCHASE
JUSTIFICATION: ADDITIONAL AREA IS NEEDED FOR
FUTURE SPORTS COMPLEX AND HIKING/
BIKING TRAIL.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASED MOWING COSTS WILL BE
INCURRED.
FINANCING: $ 125,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A)
mtr
PROJECT TITLE: POOL BUBBLE REPLACEMENT
LOCATION: CENTRAL MUNICIPAL POOL
PURPOSE: TO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE A SAFE,
INDOOR SWIMMING FACILITY.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: INSTALLATION OF A NEW, INFLATABLE
BUBBLE COVER OVER THE CENTRAL
MUNICIPAL POOL
UNIT OF WORK: PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION
JUSTIFICATION: CURRENT BUBBLE IS DETERIORATING
RAPIDLY. INSULATING LINER IS GONE.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: REDUCED UTILITY COSTS AND INCREASED
OPPORTUNITIES FOR REVENUE GROWTH.
FINANCING: $ 65,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A)*
*CASH FLOW FINANCING TO BE PROVIDED FROM OTHER FUNDS
50.
PROJECT TITLE: MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS
LOCATION: VARIOUS PARKS
PURPOSE: TO REPLACE AND EXPAND FACILITIES
WHICH ARE BASIC FOR PUBLIC USE OF
PARK AREAS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT NEW SHELTERS, INSTALL NEW
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT, PAVE PARKING
AREAS, AND INSTALL RESTROOMS.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: CITY PARKS HAVE SOME FACILITIES
WHICH ARE AGING AND NEED REPLACEMENT.
THERE ARE ALSO A NUMBER OF VACANT
AREAS WHICH NEED TO BE DEVELOPED TO
ACCOMMODATE INCREASING USE BY
CITIZENS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
$ 70,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A)
51.
Community Development
Capital -Improvement Budget
500.000
45D.OD0
300.000
15D.OD0
1992-93 1993-94 1994--95 1995-98 1996-97
52.
53.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
I
I
PROPOSED PROJECTS
I
I
1PROJECTI 1
INUMBER I IMPROVEMENT ITEM 1
TOTAL COST
1 1992-93 1 1993-94 1
( FISCAL YEAR I FISCAL YEAR I
1994-95 1 1995-96
FISCAL YEAR ( FISCAL YEAR
1. 1996-97 1
I FISCAL YEAR
i
1 4-1
I
a
I I
1 Fire Station 1
I #3 Relocation 1
l I
$
650,000
A,C
i I I
1 I I
1 I I
( I I
I
I S 50,000
I A
I
I I
I S 600,000 1
I C I
1 I
I
I
I
J
I I
I TOTALS 1
i I
I l
$
650,000
i I I
1 I I
I I I
I I I
I
I S 50,000
I
l
I I
I S 600,000 1
I I
1 1
i
I
I
t
i i
I I
i I
t t
i I I
I I I
I I I
t t
I
I
I
L i
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I A
I B
I C
1 D
1 E
1 F
1 G
1 H
J I
i GENERAL FUNDS 1
1 GEN. OBL. FUNDS I
i REV/PFA BONDS 1
1 STATE GRANTS,LOANS I
1 MOTOR FUEL TAX I
1 FED. GRANTS,LOANS 1
1 SPEC. ASSESSMENTS I
1 CAP IMP SALES TAX I
1 OTHER 1
S
$
50,000
600,000
i I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I 1 (
I I I
I I (
I I I
I I 1
I S 50,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
( I
I I
I S 600,000 1
( I
( I
I I
I I
I I
1
I
I
i
1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I i
I I i
I I I
l I i
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1
I i I
I i I
I i I
I I
I
I
I
I
i I
I I
I I
I t
I
I
I
1
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I I I
I i I
I I I
1 I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I i
I 1 1
I
i
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
J
I I
I I
1 I
I I I
I I I
1 I I
I
I
I
I I
i I
t t
I
I
I
L
I I
i I
I i
t 1
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I t
I
I
i
1
I I
I I
I I
t t
I
I
I i
I I
i I I
I I i
I
I
I I
I I
53.
PROJECT TITLE: FIRE STATION NO. 3 RELOCATION
LOCATION: SPRIGG AND BERTLING
PURPOSE: TO REPLACE A BUILDING THAT IS 40+ YEARS
OLD; TO RELOCATE TO MORE DESIRABLE
DESCRIPTION: 1 -STORY BRICK VENEER BUILDING; TWO BAY
DRIVE-THROUGH TRUCK ROOM; BASEMENT UNDER
LIVING QUARTERS.
UNIT OF WORK: ACQUIRE LAND; DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: CURRENT BUILDING IS OBSOLETE.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 50,000 GENERAL FUND (A)
$600,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
54.
LONG RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Unfunded Needs List
The following list of Capital Improvement Program Needs consists of
those projects which have been identified as major long range
facility improvements for which funding is currently not available.
No preliminary engineering or cost estimating has been done on
these projects. These projects are not listed in any order of
priority.
TRANSPORTATION
1) West End Boulevard - Lexington to Southern Expressway - (4 -lane)
2) N. Sprigg- Lexington to Rt. 177
3) Mt. Auburn Rd. - Rte. 74 to Southern Expressway
4) Southern Expressway to Mt. Auburn Rd.
5) Silver Springs Rd. - Bloomfield to Southern Expressway
6) Siemers Dr. - Bloomfield to Rte. 74
7) Hopper Rd. - Clippard School to I-55
8) Broadway - Clark to West End Blvd. (4 -lane)
9) Bloomfield Rd. - Kingshighway to Mt. Auburn
10) New Madrid St. - Henderson to Perry Ave. (incl. intersection
realignment at Henderson)
11) Vantage Dr. - Percy St. to Rt. W
12) Sidewalks - through -out the City
13) Traffic Signalization Upgrade
14) Street Lighting Improvements
15) Kingshighway/Maria Louise/Cape Rock Road Intersection
16) Independence Street from Kingshighway to West End Boulevard -
widening to add center turn lane
17) Broadview from North Kingshighway to Independence Street (401)
18) Additional Overlay Programs
19) Curb and gutter restoration - City wide
20) Additional Streets per Major Street Plan
21) Security fencing and automatic gates - Airport
22) Fuel depot relocation - Airport
23) Airport ramp and taxiway extension
24) Corporate road extension - Airport
25) Land acquisition - Airport
26) Airport Improvement Program per Airport Master Plan
27) Airport Industrial Park
28) Airport Runway Extension - Main Runway 10-8
29) Airport Terminal Area Relocation
30) Brucher St.
31) Perryville Rd.
55.
ENVIRONMENT
1) N. Sprigg Street trunk extension
2) Ramsey trunk (I-55 to Twin Lakes)
3) Highland Drive sewer
4) Sewer Improvement Program per Sewer Master Plan
5) Stormwater/Flood Control Projects per Stormwater Master Plan*
*currently being developed
PARKS AND RECREATION
1) Land Acquisition (Floodplain areas and growth areas)
2) Park Restroom Facilities
3) Capaha Lagoon
4) Capaha Baseball Diamond Completion
5) Softball /Soccer Sports Complex
6) Maintenance Facilities
7) Parking Facilities
8) Shelters
9) Community Center
10) Fort D Renovation
11) Golf Course Club House
12) Golf Course Development
13) Fair Exposition Facility
14) Capaha Pool Replacement
15) Senior Citizens Center
16) Park Lighting
17) Shawnee Park Footbridge
18) Multi -Use Play courts
19) Park Concession Stands
20) Park Road Improvements
21) Arena Building addition
22) Detention site park dev.
23) Hiking/biking trail
24) Golf Course Maintenance Facility Expansion
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1) Public Safety Annex/EOC/Communications Center
2) Neighborhood and Downtown Redevelopments
3) Historic Preservation
4) Public Safety Training Center
5) Acquisition of Additional Land for Training Center
6) Salt storage building
7) Public Works Center Improvements
8) Acquisition of O'Kelley Property for additional parking for
Fire Station No. 1
56.