HomeMy WebLinkAboutCIP1991-1996[guar I Ni n
INS 1!1(�rl M -w 11111.01111
p POOR
re,
P,
'N.
PAR
BILL NO. 91-38
RESOLUTION NO. 6 D?
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL 1991 - 1996
- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Article VI, Section 6.04 of the Charter of the City
of Cape Girardeau requires a Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has presented a proposed Capital
Improvement Program to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, proper notice has been published concerning the
availability for inspection of the proposed Capital Improvement
Program and the time and place for a public hearing on the Capital
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on the
proposed Capital Improvement Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
ARTICLE 1. The City Council hereby adopts the five-year
Capital Improvement Program for fiscal 1991-1996, copies of which
are on file in the office of the Citv Clerk.
ARTICLE 2. The City Clerk is instructed to attach an executed
copy of this resolution to a copy of the Capital Improvement
Program for fiscal 199171996 and to retain such copy with the
permanent records of the City.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS (g U- DAY OF 19 pI
ancis E. Rhodes, Mayor
ATTEST:
cyw�'aojD
Julie A. Dale
Deput,xy City Clerk
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM
PAGES
Introduction:
City Manager's Letter
I
Revenue Sources
VI
Summaries:
Revenue Funding Sources By Fiscal Year Graph
VII
Summary of Funding Sources by Fiscal Year 1991-19.96
VIII
Summary of Recommended Capital Improvement Program
IX
Expenditures 1991-1996 by Program Description and
Source of Funds
Summary of Funding Sources Graph
X
Capital Improvement Budget By Program Area Graph
XI
Capital Improvements Program:
Transportation
1 - 35
Environment
36 - 56
Recreation and Leisure
57 - 63
Community Development
64 - 66
March 18, 1991
The Honorable Mayor
•and
Members of the City Council
City of Cape Girardeau
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
INTRODUCTION
In -accordance with Article VI, Section 6.04 of the City Charter,
a recommended five year capital program was submitted to the
City Council. This five year plan is for the period July 1,
1991, through June 30, 1996. On March 18, 1991, in accordance
with the City Charter, the City Council held a public hearing
for the Capital Improvement Program. Following public input,
the City Council passed a resolution on that day adopting the
Capital Improvement Program It should be noted that this final
Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 1991-1996 includes
some changes from the proposed document.
The material contained within the budget document complies with
the requirements of the Charter as to program proposals, cost
estimates, methods of financing, projection of revenue sources
to meet costs, recommended time schedule for each improvement,
and any anticipated impact on the annual operating budget.
In reviewing this proposed document, the City Council will give
particular emphasis to establishing priorities for projects and
realistic financing sources for implementation. The projects
included in this document are attainable without additional
revenue authorized by the voters in the community with the
exception of certain sewer system improvements which will need a
revenue bond authorization. Also, while the projects included
herein are attainable through available revenue sources, a
number of these depend on the cooperation of property owners and
other agencies.
Each of the major advisory boards to the City Council and
department heads were invited to submit proposed projects -for
consideration in this program. In addition, a number of
projects from the previous five-year capital improvement program
are also included.
BACKGROUND
The Capital Improvement Program should, be considered as an
investment in the future of our community. The selection and
evaluation of capital projects is a difficult task that involves
some speculation and the ability to make estimations which, to
some extent, are based on historical perspectives.
I
The City Council, in 1983, formally considered and adopted a
long range Capital Improvement Program for the first time under
the current Charter requirement. This budget' document process
should provide a relevant approach to identifying and
implementing important community -wide projects.
PROGRAM AND FINANCING DESCRIPTIONS
The major category program areas in which the various projects
have been described include Transportation, Environment,
Recreation and Leisure Time, and Community Development. These
major categories contain the following types of projects:
1. Transportation. The activities in this area provide for
the construction of the public streets within the City and
Municipal Airport improvements.
2. Environment. The preservation, restoration, and care of
the physical resources of the City, including the control
of solid waste, wastewater, and stormwater.
3. Recreation and Leisure Time. The programs under this area
provide the facilities for citizens to enjoy an
opportunity to participate in organized and unorganized
leisure time activities.
4. Community Development. Activities under this area include
construction of general public facilities and community
projects which have citywide effect.
We have included the types of revenue sources which are
recommended as ways to consider for the financing of the various
capital improvements. The following is a brief discussion of
what the various revenue sources include.
A. General Fund Revenues. These revenues would be included
and available on an annual appropriation basis from the
City's general fund, which includes the receipt of
revenues from many and various sources.
B. General Obligation Bonds. These bonds are issued for the
financing of general public improvements and must be
authorized by a 4/7 majority vote of the citizens.
Approval of these bonds by the electorate also authorizes
a property tax levy to retire the debt.
II
C. Revenue/PFA Bonds. These bonds are issued for the
financing of self-supporting and general public
improvements. Revenue bonds are not included within the
limitations of indebtedness by the City and are issued
upon the authorization of a majority, voter approval.
These bonds are used for enterprise funds such as water,
sewer and electric utilities, as well as the Airport and
Golf Course operations. PFA Bonds are issued upon City
Council approval based on collateralized assets and annual
lease/purchase appropriations. Cash flows for debt
retirement come from the existing revenue and from new
receipts to be generated by the facilities' operations.
D. State Grants. The City is eligible to submit grant
applications to the State of Missouri for funds that they
may have available either from their own revenue sources
or, in some cases, from revenue sources that they
administer for various federal agencies.
E. Motor Fuel Tax Receipts. This fund provides for the
receipt and disbursement of the revenues the City receives
as its portion of the State Gasoline Tax, State Motor
Vehicle Licensing, and State Motor Vehicle Sales Tax. The
revenues from this source can be used for capital, as well
as annual operating maintenance expenses as they relate to
improvements on the City's streets.
F. Federal Grants. The City is eligible to receive various
federal grants on a competitive basis from the appropriate
federal agency. This could include the Environmental
Protection Agency as it relates to wastewater
improvements, the Federal Highway Administration which
administers and distributes funds from the Federal
Gasoline Tax revenue through the Federal Aid Urban
program, or the Federal Aviation Administration for
airport improvements.
G. Special Assessments. This category provides for the
consideration of special assessments which are used for
public improvements affecting specific areas. The total
or a portion of the cost of an improvement is divided
among property owners who benefit from the project. This
type of funding can be used for diverse improvements
including streets, storm water, sanitary sewer or sidewalk
improvement.
H. Capital Improvement Sales Tax. A 1/4 cent, 3/8 cent, or
1/2 cent Sales Tax can be issued by the City for various
general types of public improvements. Such a tax requires
the approval by the electorate with simple majority. In
November, 1988, the voters of Cape Girardeau adopted a
1/4 cent sales tax effective January 1, 1990, restricted
to flood control projects.
III
I. Other. This category is used for donations, operating
revenues from funds other than the Gener4l Fund, reserves,
proceeds from the sale of fixed assets, etc.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The total Capital Improvement Program included here is
$34,135,442. This program is $9,656,492.00 more than the
program approved last year, primarily due to the inclusion of
some major improvements to the older parts of the sewer system
identified in the Master Sewer Plan currently being developed.
The largest category for funding proposed improvements over the
next five years is through Revenue Bonds. This provides for
$9,273,551.00 in funding over this period of time.
The second largest source of funding for proposed improvements
is through the use of Capital Improvement Sales Tax
($7,987,393). This revenue source would be utilized totally for
flood control improvements.
The third largest funding source is the Special Assessments
($5,183,090), which will be used for street and lateral sewer
projects. This area is proposed to be used based on the
traditional policy in Cape Girardeau that improvements should be
paid by those property owners directly benefiting from a
project.
The largest program area is Environment ($17,620,498). The most
significant projects in this area are the funding of the Corps
of Engineers Flood Control on Cape La Croix Creek -Walker
Branch and the separation of storm and sanitary sewers in the
College/Henderson watershed.
The Transportation Program area ($15,813,944) contains the
second largest amount of proposed expenditures over the next
five year period. This is due to the extensive major street
construction and Airport Improvement that is anticipated.
The Recreation Program Area ($431,000) includes small
improvement projects in the first year and some allocation of
remaining funds to construction of new ballfields and soccer
improvements in Shawnee Park.
The Community Development Program Area ($270,000) includes only
one project as presently proposed, an upgrade and expansion of
the City's Public Works Center. This is a project that will
eliminate the need to relocate the Public Works Center as had
previously been discussed.
Iv
CONCLUSION
The capital improvement program adopted by the Council is an
ambitious program. However, the implementation of this program
will allow for the creation of new job opportunities, an
increase in revenues to private businesses, new businesses
growing, existing businesses expanding, increased tax revenues
to all taxing jurisdictions, and the strengthening of the
quality of life in Cape Girardeau and all of Southeast
Missouri.
It is hoped that this plan will focus attention on community
goals, needs and capabilites; reduce scheduling problems and
conflicting or overlapping projects; maintain a sound and stable
financial program; enhance opportunities for participation in
federal or state funded programs; and achieve the highest public
benefit fr$m the expenditure of City revenue.
The projects proposed in this document are the product of many
hours of deliberative thought by a number of people within this
community. The Charter requires an annual review and revision
of the Capital Improvements Program which assures that the
program remains responsive to chancing demands and priorities.
We plan to review the various projects and funding proposals
contained within this document with City Council members in
various work sessions and the public hearing.
The final scope of this program as adopted by the City Council
following the appropriate public hearing is limited to
affordable, achievable, priority projects. The final plan
should be regarded as a sound, fiscally responsible working
document that can and will be implemented through the annual
budget appropriation process of the City Council, support from
the citizens of Cape Girardeau for appropriate revenue sources,
and diligent action by the City staff.
JRF/AMS/jad
Respectfully submitted,
YRonald Fischer
City Manager
V
Alvin M. Stoverink
Assistant City Manager
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
REVENUE SOURCES
General Fund Revenues
General Obligation Bonds
Revenue/PFA Bonds
State Grants
Motor Fuel Tax Receipts
VI
F. Federal Grants
G. Special Assessments
H. Capital Improvement
Sales Tax
I. Other
Revenue Fund -Ing Sources by Fiscal Year
Capital Improvement Budget
10,030,000
$,ODD.ODO
6,030.000
4,ODD.ODD
2,03D.OD0
991-92 1992-93 1953--94. 1994-95 1995-98
VII
SUMMARY OF FUNDING SOURCES BY FISCAL YEAR 1991-1996
I
SOURCE OF FUNDS
J
I
1 1991-92
1
I
1 1992-93
1
I
1 1993-94
I
I I
1 1994-95 1
I I
1995-96
I I
I TOTAL
I 1
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
J S 197,500
J $ 150,000
I S 200,800
J $ 218,600 1
$ 195,000
I $ 961,900 1
I
GENERAL
J
OBLIGATION BONDS
I
I
I 1
I I
I I
I
I
I
1
I
I
!
I
1 S
1
I
000000 J
1
I
J REVENUE
t
BONDS/PFA
I
I $1,968,741
t
I I
1 $2,872,010 I
J J
I
$1,021,800 1
I
$1,141,000 1
t
f
$2,270,000
I
1 S
I
I
9,273,551 J
t
I
STATE GRANTS
J
i
J S 466,500
1
I I
I $ 185,000 1
I 1
I
S 50,800 I
I
I
S 21,550
I
I
I
1$
I
I
723,850 I
I
MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPT
J
I
1 S 778,880
I
I I
1 $1,755,040 J
I I
I
S 587,500 (
J
$ 348,750
I
1 S 744,590
I
I
154,214,760 1
I I
I
I FEDERAL
GRANTS
I
1 $2,265,428
I
I I
I $ 100,000 1$
1 1
i
914,600 J
J
S 523,100
J
i
J S 622,770
I
1 S
J
I
4,425,898 I
I
I
SPECIAL
I
ASSESSMENTS
I
I $1,016,690
I
I I
1 S 549,100 1
I J
S 917,000
I
( $1,381,350
I
I
1 $1,318,950
I
I
I S
I
I
5,183,090
I
I
J CAPITAL
J
IMPROVEMENT SALES
I
TAX 1 $2,172,725
I
I I
J $3,814,668 I
I I
$2,000,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
J S
J
I
7,987,393 1
I
I
I OTHER
J
I
1 $ 287,000
I
I I
1 S 532,000 J
J I
$ 182,000
I
1$ 182,000
J
I
1 $ 182,000
I
I
1 $
I
I
1,365,000 i
I
I
TOTALS
J
I
IS 9,153,464
►
I I
1 S 9,957,8181
I I
$5,874,500
I
1 $3,816,350
I
I
1 $5,333,310
I
I I
1 $34,135,442 J
1 J.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I
1 EXPENDITURES 1991-1996 BY PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND SOURCE OF FUNDS I
GENERAL IGENERAL I REVENUE I IMOTOR FUEL I I I CAPITAL I I I
PROGRAM I FUND IOBLIGAT.1 BONDS/ I STATE I TAX I FEDERAL I SPECIAL (IMPROVEMENT( I I
1DESCRIPTIONI REVENUES 1_BONDS I PFA I GRANTS I RECEIPTS I GRANTS (ASSESSMENT I SALES TAX I OTHER I TOTAL 1
I I I I I I 1 I I I I i
ITRANSPORT. IS 310,900 1 IS 845,451 IS 353,850 IS4,214,760 IS4,225,898 IS4,506,690 1$1,356,395 I IS15,813,9441
j I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I i I I I I I I
1ENVIRONMENTI I 1$ 8,428,10015 370,0001 1$ 200,000 IS 676,400 IS6,630,998 1$1,315,000 1$17,620,4981
IRECREATION i
AND IS 381,000 1 I' I I I I I IS 50,000 1$ 431,0001
I LEISURE I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
ICOMMUNITY 1$ 270,000 I I I I I i I I IS 270,0001
IDEVELOPMEMTI I I I 1 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
TOTALS 1$ 961,9001 IS 9,273,5511E 723,850 1$4,214,760 IS4,425,898 1$5,183,090 IS7,987,393 IS1,650,000 1$34,135,4421
IX
Summary of Funding Sources
Capital Improvement Budget
STATE
GRANTS/LOANS 2%
MOTOR FUEL
TAX RECEIPT 12%
FEDERAL
GRANTS/LOANS 13r
SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS 15%
OTHER
4%,
RaENUE/PFA
BONDS 17%
GENERAL
FUND REVENUES 3%
CAP IWP
SALES TA}; 23%
Capital Improvement Budget
By Program Area
EWIRONMENT
52%
V.0I
i"%L-vI%L -NI MV
AND LEISURE 1%
TRANS PO RTATI O N
4-69
Transportation
Capl.tal Improvement ent Budget
5,090,400
4,ODD,4D0
3,0';10,000
2,496.400.
1991-9a 1992-93 1933-91 1994-95 1995-98
-1-
-2-
TRANSPORTATION
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
i
I I
1991-92 I
1992-93 I
1993-94 I
1994-95 I
1995-96 i
IPROJECTI
NUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
TOTAL COST
FISCAL YEAR
I
FISCAL YEAR
I
FISCAL YEAR
I
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
I
1 1-1 I
Lexington
I I
I $3,070,000 I
$2,120,000 1$
950,000 I
I
I I
I
Street
I D,E,F,G I
I I
D,E,F,G I
I
E I
I
I
1
I
(-
1 I
1 1-2 (
Hopper Road
Bridge &
I I
I $1,296,110 I
I
I
I
i
I
I$ 665,750
I I
I$ 630,360 I
I I
Extension to
I E,F,G I
I
I
I E,G
I E,F I
I I
l I
Kave Road
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
1 1-3 I
Sprigg Street
I I
I$ 502,640 I$
502,640 I
I
I
I
I
Bridge
I E,F I
E,F I
I
I
I
I 1-4 I
Street Overlay
I $ 750,000 I
$ 150,000
I $ 150,000 I
$ 150,000
I $ 150,000
I $ 150,000 I
E I
E
I E I
E
I E
I E I
1
1-5 I
I I
Clark
227,500
I$ I
I
I
I$ 227,500
I I
Avenue
I G I
I
I
I G
I I
I
1 1-6
I
I Brucher Street
I
I$ 64,100
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I$ 64,100
I I
I I
i
I
I A,G
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I A,G
I
I I
1 1
1
I 1-7
1
311 Asphalt
I Paving
I
I $ 750,000
I
I $ 150,000
I
I $ 150,000
I
I $ 150,000
I
I $ 150,000
I
I $ 150,000
I
I Program
I G
I G
I G
I G
I G
I
I
1 1-8
I
I N. Corporate
I
I$ 480,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I$ 480,000 '
I
( Circle Drive
( G
I
I
I
I
I
11-9
I North Sprigg
I$ 650,000
I
i$ 650,000
I
I
I I
I
I Extension
I E,G
I
i E,G
1-10
I Perryville Road
I $ 800,000
I
( $ 20,000
I
I $ 100,000
I
I $ 680,000
I
I I
I
I
I E,G
I E
I E
I E,G
i
I
I
I I
I I
I
1 1-11
I
I Vantage Drive
I
I$ 55,000
i
I
I
i S 55,000
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I E
I
I E
I
I
I
1 1-12
I Silver Springs
I$ 500,000
I
I$ 25,000
I$ 475,000
I
I I
I Road
I E,G
I
I E
I G
I
I
I Extension
I
I
I
I
I I
-2-
TRANSPORTATION
PROPOSED PROJECTS
IPROJECTI
J
J
1991-92 J
1992-93 J
1993-94 I
1994-95 J
1995-96 I
(NUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
I TOTAL COST
I FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
I I
11-13 I
Whitener St.
I
I S
24,790
I
I $
I
24,790
I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
j I
I
I
G
I
J
G
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
11-14 I
Good Hope
I
I S
38,720
I
I S
38,720
I I
I I
I
I I
Bridge
I
E
I
E
I I
I I
I
I
J 1-15 I
Morgan Oak
I
I S
32,540
I
I
I I
I S 32,540 I
I
I
I I
I I
I J
L I
Bridge
I
I
E
I
I
1
I E I
I
I
J
I I
I I
11-16 I
North Main
I S
53,300
J S
53,300
J
I
I
I I
I I
j I
Widening
J
I
E
I
I
E
I
I
I
J
I
I
I I
I I
I I
11-17 I
Bloomfield
I
J S
31,200
I
I S
31,200
I
J
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
J
I I
Widening
J
1
E
I
J
E
I
I
J
J
I
I
I I
I 1
I I
11-18 I
S. West End
I
J S
665,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I S 63,000
I I
I S 602,000 I
I I
I I
Boulevard
I
I
E,G
I
I
I
I
I
j
I E
I
I E,G I
I I
I
11-19 I
Sidewalks and
I
I $
250,000
I
I S
50,000
I
I $ 50,000
I
J S 50,000
I
J S 50,000
I
I S 50,000 J
I I
Curbs
I
A,G
J
A,G
I A,G
I A,G
I A,G
J A,G I
I I
J 1-20 I
Mt. Auburn
I
I $
387,000
I
I
I
I S 30,000
I
J
I
J $ 176,300
I I
J S 180,700 I
I I
1 I
Extension
I
I
G
I
I
I G
I
I
I
I G
j
I G I
I I
I I
11-21 I
Lorimier
I
I S
200,350
I
J
I
J $ 20,000
I
I
I
15 78,600
I I
J $ 101,750 I
I
1 I
Extension
I
j
G
I
J
I G
I
I
I
I G
1
I G I
I I
I
J 1-22 I
Flood Project
I
I $
1,356,395
I
I S
120,225
I
I $1,236,170
i
J
I
J
I I
I J
I I
J I
Bridges
I
j
H
J
I
H
H
J
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
11-23 I
Airport
I
I $
130,000
I
I S
130,000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
j I
Fuel Depot
J
I
A,D,F
I
j
A,D,F
J
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
-3-
TRANSPORTATION
PROPOSED PROJECTS
IPROJECTI
(NUMBER I
1
IMPROVEMENT ITEM I
1
TOTAL COST I
1991-92
FISCAL YEAR
1 1992-93
1 FISCAL YEAR
1 1993-94
I FISCAL YEAR
I 1994-95 1
I FISCAL YEAR I
1995-96 1
FISCAL YEAR I
1 1-24 I
Hangars I
S
300,000
I
i S 300,000
I
I I
1
I I
1 I
I
I
C
I
I
I C
J
I
1
I I
I I
I
I
I I
1 1-25 1
I
Ramp and 1
5
862,400
I
1
I
I
I
1 S 431,200
I I
1 5 431,200 I
I
I
I I
1 I
Taxiway 1
i
A,D,F
1
i
I
I
I A,D,F
I
I A,D,F I
I I
I
I
I I
i 1-26 1
I
Airport Land I
$
175,000
I
I
I
I
I
i
I I
1 I
I
$ 175,000 1
I I
Acquisition 1
A,F
I
I
I
I I
A•F I
Airport
11-27 (
Terminal 1
5
1,076,899
I $ 1,076,899
I 1
Building 1
C,F
I C,F
I
I
I I
I
I I
1 1-28 1
I
Airport Water 1$
350,000
I
1$ 350,000
I
I
I I
i
I I
System 1
A,F
1 A,F
I
I
I I
I
I I
Airport
1-29 I
Sewer 1$
195,000
I
I
I $ 195,000
I (
I
I I
1 I
Extension I
I
A,D,F
I
I
I
I
I A,D,F
J
I I
1 I
I
I
I I
11-30 1
I
Airport Road 1
5
390,000
I
1
I
I
I
I $ 390,000
i I
I 1
I
I
I I
I I
Extension I
I
A,D,F
I
I
I
I
I A,D,F
I
I I
I I
I
i
I I
11-31 I
I
Fire and I
S
150,000
I
I
I
i
I
I
I I
I $ 150,000 I
I
I
I I
J I
Rescue I
1
A, F
I
1
I
J
I
I
I A. F I
I i
I
t
I I
I
I i
I
TOTALS 1
i
$15,813,944
I
1 $4,817,774
I
I
1 $3,748,710
I
I
1 $2,521,200
I
I I
I 52,206,450 i
I
I
$2,519,810 1
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I
I
1
I
I
J
I
I
J
i
I
l
I
I
I
I I
I I
I l
A I
GENERAL FUND. I
$
310,900
1$ 66,500
1$ 25,000
I $ 75,800
1$ 93,600
1$ 50,000 1
B I
GEN. OBL. FUNDS I,
i
I
1
I
I I
1 C I
REV/PFA BONDS 1$
845,451
1$ 545,451
1 $ 300,000
1
I
I I
1 D 1
STATE GRANTS, LOANSI
$
353,850
1$ 281,500
1
1$ 50,800
1$ 21,550
1$ 1
l E I
MOTOR FUEL TAX 1
$
4,214,760
1 $ 778,880
1 $ 1,755,040
1 $ 587,500
I $ 348,750
I $ 744,590
i F 1
FED. GRANTS, LOANS I
$
4,225,898
1$ 2,165,428
I
1$ 914,600
I $ 523,100
I S 622,770 1
I G 1
SPEC. ASSESSMENTS I
$
4,506,690
1 $ 859,790
1$ 432,500
1 5 892,500
1 $1,219,450
1 $1,102,450 1
I H I
CAP. IMP. SALES TAXI
S
1,356,395
1$ 120,225
1$ 1,236,170
1
I
1 1
I I I
OTHER J
I
I
1
1 J
1
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
-4-
PROJECT TITLE: LEXINGTON STREET
LOCATION: KINGSHIGHWAY TO ROUTE 177
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEXINGTON AS
AN ARTERIAL STREET RUNNING EAST AND WEST
ACROSS THE NORTH PART OF THE CITY.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 17,424 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE AND ASPHALT
PAVEMENT 44 FEET WIDE WITH CURBS.
CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE OVER CAPE LACROIX CREEK.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY TRAFFIC
FLOW EAST/WEST THROUGH THE NORTH PART OF THE
CITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 275,000 STATE GRANTS (D)
$1,310,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$ 825,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$ 660,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-5-
PROJECT TITLE: HOPPER ROAD BRIDGE AND EXTENSION TO KAGE ROAD
LOCATION: HOPPER ROAD
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BRIDGE
ON HOPPER ROAD EAST OF MOUNT AUBURN ROAD AND
THE RECONSTRUCTION OF HOPPER ROAD FROM JUST
WEST OF THE HAWTHORNE SCHOOL PROPERTY TO
MOUNT AUBURN ROAD. PROVIDE HOPPER ROAD
EXTENSION TO KAGE ROAD.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 110 LINEAR FOOT BRIDGE OVER CAPE LACROIX CREEK
WITH A MINIMUM OF TWO LANES. 7,650 LINEAR
FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT WITH
CURBS; 36 FEET WIDE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: BRIDGE IS FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE, TOO NARROW
FOR EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME. EXTEND EXISTING
HIGH TYPE PAYVEMENT ON HOPPER ROAD TO HANDLE
INCREASED TRAFFIC AND TO MATCH BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $293,340 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$472,770 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$530,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
SPRIGG STREET PHASE.III
SPRIGG STREET
PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE_CAPE LA
CROIX BRIDGE AT SOUTH SPRIGG STREET.
APPROXIMATELY 110 LINEAR FOOT TWO-LANE BRIDGE
AND APPROACHES.
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY
BRIDGE IS FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE, NEARING
STRUCTURAL OBSOLESCENCE. IT SERVES SEVERAL
MAJOR INDUSTRIES AND WILL SERVE THE WASTE
TRANSFER SITE FOR THE CITY.
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
$125,660 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$376,980 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
-7-
PROJECT TITLE: STREET OVERLAY
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
PURPOSE: PROVIDES FOR CONTINUING MAJOR STREET
MAINTENANCE PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FOR THE
OVERLAY OF 7 MILES OF LOCAL AND COLLECTOR
ASPHALT STREETS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
MILLING OR OTHER SURFACE PROFILING METHOD AND
ASPHALT OVERLAY.
CONSTRUCT
COST EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE TO PREVENT NEED FOR
FUTURE RECONSTRUCTION OF ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
$750,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
-8-
PROJECT TITLE: CLARK AVENUE
LOCATION: FROM LOMBARDO DRIVE TO MARIETTA STREET
PURPOSE: TO PAVE A SECTION OF STREET PREVIOUSLY
PLATTED.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVING APPROXIMATELY 1640 FEET FROM LOMBARDO
DRIVE TO MARIETTA STREET WITH ASSOCIATED
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: WILL CONNECT TWO ENDS OF CLARK.STREET,
PROVIDING A SUB -COLLECTOR ROUTE NORTH AND
SOUTH.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $227,500 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
PROJECT TITLE: BRUCHER STREET
LOCATION: BERTLING STREET TO BUTLER STREET
PURPOSE: PAVE AN EXISTING GRAVEL STREET
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVING, 20' WIDE FOR 915' AND STORM DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: LOWER THE MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR THIS STREET
AND IMPROVE THIS STREET TO A LEVEL SIMILAR TO
THE SURROUNDING -AREA.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 32,050 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$ 32,050 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
-10-
PROJECT TITLE: 3" ASPHALT PAVING PROGRAM
LOCATION: VARIOUS CITY STREETS
PURPOSE: TO SURFACE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL GRAVEL
STREETS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: TWENTY FOOT (20') WIDE HOT MIX ASPHALTIC
CONCRETE SURFACING ON EXISTING GRAVEL STREET
BASE WHERE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE CAN BE ASSURED.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REDUCE GRAVEL STREET MAINTENANCE COSTS.
ENHANCE NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: REMOVAL OF APPROXIMATELY 7 MILES OF GRAVEL
STREETS WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE COSTS OF
GRADING AND ROCK REPLACEMENT.
FINANCING: $750,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-11-
PROJECT TITLE:
NORTH CORPORATE CIRCLE
LOCATION:
HIGHWAY 74 TO RUSMAR AVE.
PURPOSE:
TO REPLACE MINNESOTA AVENUE AS A LOCAL STREET
SERVING AN INDUSTRIAL/COMMERICAL AREA.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
2400 LINEAR FEET OF 40 FOOT WIDE ASPHALT OR
CONCRETE PAVEMENT.
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION:
ADDITIONAL NORTH/SOUTH CONNECTOR IS NEEDED
FOR PRIVATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY
PLANNED AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ACCESS TO
SHAWNEE PARK SOCCER FIELD.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $480,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-12-
PROJECT TITLE: NORTH SPRIGG EXTENSION
LOCATION: NORTH SPRIGG STREET
PURPOSE: PROVIDE A NORTH -SOUTH LINK FOR VARIOUS EAST -
WEST ARTERIAL STREETS TO THE DOWNTOWN AREA.
EXTEND NORTH SPRIGG FROM BERTLING TO CONNECT
WITH THE LEXINGTON/MELODY LANE ARTERIAL.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
4,150 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT
PAVEMENT, 44 FEET WIDE WITH CURBS.
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY FLOW OF
TRAFFIC IN THE COMMUNITY.
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
$207,500 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$442,500 MOTOR FUEL TAX (E)
-13-
PROJECT TITLE: PERRYVILLE ROAD
LOCATION: PERRYVILLE ROAD
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF
PERRYVILLE ROAD AS COLLECTOR STREET NORTH
TO THE CITY LIMITS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: THIS PROJECT IS 1 MILE AND INCLUDES
WIDENING AND ADDING CURBS AND GUTTERS.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: INCREASE THE SERVICE LEVEL OF THE ROADWAY
TO HANDLE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC VOLUME.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $242,500 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$557,500 MOTOR FUEL (E)
-14-
PROJECT TITLE: VANTAGE DRIVE
LOCATION: MO RTE. K NORTHERLY TO U.S. HIGHWAY 61
PURPOSE: PROVIDE AN OUTER ROAD BELT ALONG 1-55 AND
CONNECTING NORTHERN ARTERIAL ROUTES.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING TO ESTABLISH A
RIGHT-OF-WAY CORRIDOR FOR VANTAGE DRIVE AS
SHOWN ON THE CITY'S MASTER STREET PLAN.
UNIT OF WORK: SURVEY, LEGAL AND ENGINEERING
JUSTIFICATION: ORDERLY GROWTH ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED
1987 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $55,000.00 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
-15-
PROJECT TITLE: SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
LOCATION: SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR THE CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF
SILVER SPRINGS ROAD AS A COLLECTOR STREET.
CONSTRUCTION NORTH FROM ROUTE K TO THE
COMPLETED SECTION SOUTH OF INDEPENDENCE.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 2,100 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT
PAVEMENT 40 FEET WIDE WITH CURBS.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: TO EXTEND PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY
TRAFFIC FLOW.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $475,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$ 25,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX (E) .
-16-
PROJECT TITLE: WHITENER STREET
LOCATION: FROM WESTERLY END TO SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT 30 FOOT WIDE PAVEMENT WITH
CURBS AND DRAINAGE APPROXIMATELY 200' LONG.
UNIT OF WORK: CONSTRUCTION
JUSTIFICATION: CONNECTION TO SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NEEDED FOR.
EMERGENCY VEHICLE AND OTHER ACCESS TO DENSELY
DEVELOPED MULTI -FAMILY AREA.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 24,790 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-17-
PROJECT TITLE: GOOD HOPE/FOUNTAIN BRIDGE REMOVAL
LOCATION: INTERSECTION OF GOODHOPE AND FOUNTAIN
PURPOSE: REPLACEMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: DEMOLISH STRUCTURE, FILL ACROSS FOUNTAIN
AND REPLACE GOOD HOPE PAVEMENT. PROTECT
ADJACENT SANITARY SEWER.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:' USE OF BRIDGES BY RAILROAD HAS BEEN ABANDONED.
AGE OF BRIDGES AND DETERIORATION REQUIRE
ACTION TO MAINTAIN SAFETY OF GOOD HOPE.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 38,720 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
-18-
PROJECT TITLE: MORGAN OAK/FOUNTAIN BRIDGE REMOVAL
LOCATION: INTERSECTION OF MORGAN OAK AND FOUNTAIN
PURPOSE: REPLACEMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: DEMOLISH STRUCTURE, FILL ACROSS FOUNTAIN
AND REPLACE MORGAN OAK PAVEMENT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: USE OF BRIDGES BY RAILROAD HAS BEEN ABANDONED.
AGE OF BRIDGES AND DETERIORATION REQUIRE
ACTION TO MAINTAIN SAFETY OF MORGAN OAK.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 32,540 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
-19-
PROJECT TITLE: N. MAIN STREET WIDENING
LOCATION: FROM MILL STREET TO MASON STREET
PURPOSE: REHABILITATION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REDUCE THE DEGREE OF CURVATURE OF NORTH MAIN
AT MILL AND WIDEN PAVEMENT FROM MILL TO
MASON STREET TO 38', MODIFY DRAINAGE, OVERLAY
ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: IMPROVE TRAFFIC FLOW AND SAFETY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 53,300 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
-20-
PROJECT TITLE: BLOOMFIELD ROAD WIDENING
LOCATION: FROM U.S. 61 TO MOUNT AUBURN RD.
PURPOSE: TO DEVELOP A PLAN OF IMPROVEMENTS TO
ACCOMMODATE INCREASING TRAFFIC FLOWS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
JUSTIFICATION: TRAFFIC SAFETY
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 31,200 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
-21-
PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH WEST END BLVD.
LOCATION: FROM PROPOSED MO. RT. 74 TO SOUTHERN
EXPRESSWAY
PURPOSE: RECONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVE 4490' INCLUDING MEDIAN AND STORM
DRAINAGE
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: ENHANCE TRAFFIC FLOW TO DEVELOPING INDUSTRIAL
AND RECREATIONAL AREAS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 500,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$ 165,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-22-
PROJECT TITLE: SIDEWALKS AND CURBS
LOCATION: CITY WIDE
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REPLACEMENT OF CONCRETE SIDWALKS AND CURB
SECTIONS AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SIDEWALKS.•
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 125,000 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
$ 125,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-23-
PROJECT TITLE: MT. AUBURN EXTENSION
LOCATION: FROM BLOOMFIELD SOUTH TO PROPOSED MO HWY 74
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY
WITH CURBS AND DRAINAGE 44' WIDE
UNIT OF WORK: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION
JUSTIFICATION: TO CONNECT MT. AUBURN, A WEST SIDE ARTERIAL
STREET, WITH THE PROPOSED MO HWY 74
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 387,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-24-
PROJECT TITLE: LORIMIER STREET EXTENSION
LOCATION: FROM MORGAN OAK SOUTH TO PROPOSED MO
HWY 74
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PAVING WITH CURBS 40 FEET WIDE APPROXIMATELY
1925 LINEAL FEET
UNIT OF WORK: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: TO PROVIDE A DIRECT ACCESS FROM THE
PROPOSED MO HWY 74 TO THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS
DISTRICT OF THE CITY
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 200,350 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-25-
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - FLOOD PROJECT
THEMIS ST.
MERRIWTHER ST.
GOOD HOPE
ARBY'S BRIDGE
BESSIE ST.
MARIETTA ST.
LINDA ST.
BLOOMFIELD ST.
REPLACEMENT
(REALIGNMENT)
REMOVE AND REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
FLOOD CONTROL
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$1,356,395 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SALES TAX(H)-
-26-
PROJECT TITLE: FUEL DEPOT
LOCATION: CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: TO UPDATE AND SECURE FUELING PIT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: BUILD NEW FUEL STORAGE AREA AND FUEL FLOW
MONITORING.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: TO BECOME FUEL DISTRIBUTING POINT FOR ALL
AIRPORT USERS AND SURROUNDING COMMUNITY
AIRPORTS; IMPROVE THE SAFETY OF THIS
FACILITY.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASE REVENUES TO AIRPORT OPERATING FUND.
FINANCING: $117,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$ 6,500 STATE GRANTS (D)
$ 6,500 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
-27-
PROJECT TITLE: HANGARS
LOCATION: CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: TO ADD STORAGE FACILITIES AND OFFICE SPACE.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ONE (1) CORPORATE HANGAR WITH
ASSOCIATED OFFICE SPACE FOR RENTAL.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: FOR EVENTUAL REVENUES DERIVED FROM RENTALS
AND TO ATTRACT ADDITIONAL BASED AIRCRAFT AND
RELATED BUSINESS FOR THE AIPORT.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASE REVENUES TO AIRPORT OPERATING FUND.
FINANCING: $300,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
-28-
PROJECT TITLE: RAMP AND TAXIWAY CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION: CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: INCREASE PARKING SPACE FOR AIRCRAFT - BETTER
TRAFFIC FLOW.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: INCREASE GENERAL AVIATION RAMP -SOUTH BY
APPROXIMATELY 1501; INSTALL TAXIWAY CONNECTING
RAMP TO TAXIWAY C.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: TO ADD MORE EASE AND SAFETY IN HANDLING OF
AIRCRAFT ON THE GROUND.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $776,200 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$ 43,100 STATE GRANTS (D)
$ 43,100 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
-29-
PROJECT TITLE: LAND ACQUISITION
LOCATION: CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: FOR AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK, FUTURE
TERMINAL AREA AND LAND USE CONTROLS
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: PURCHASE OF APPROXIMATELY 115 ACRES OF LAND
UNIT OF WORK: ACQUIRE LAND
JUSTIFICATION: TO HAVE AMPLE AREA FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS
AND AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS PROVIDE
A MEANS OF CONTROLLING DEVELOPMENT IN
ADJACENT AREAS TO INSURE COMPATIBILITY WITH
AVIATION ACTIVITY
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASE REVENUE TO AIRPORT OPERATING FUND.
FINANCING: $ 150,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
25,000 GENERAL FUND (A)
-30-
PROJECT TITLE: RENOVATE TERMINAL BUILDING
LOCATION: CAPE GIRARDEAU,MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: TO BETTER USE EXISTING SPACE AND TO MAKE
THE FACILITY MORE EYE APPEALING AND
ECONOMICALLY SOUND
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: RENOVATE BUILDING TO FACILITATE TWO OR THREE
AIRLINES; EXPAND THE RESTAURANT AND CREATE
MEETING AND EXECUTIVE LOUNGES.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: ONGOING PUBLIC USE OF BUILDING WILL
NECESSITATE ITS RENOVATION TO BECOME MORE
ACCESSIBLE.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: REDUCE UTILITIES AND BUILDING MAINTENANCE;
INCREASE REVENUES TO AIRPORT OPERATING FUND.
FINANCING: $545,451 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
$531,448 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
-31-
PROJECT TITLE: WATER SYSTEM
LOCATION: CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: TO FACILITATE FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITIES
AND INCREASE POTABLE WATER ACCESS FOR FUTURE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF A 100,000 GALLON WATER STORAGE
FACILITY AND INSTALLATION OF MAINS, HYDRANTS,
AND WELL CHLORINATION.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: TO INSURE PROPERTY FIRE PROTECTION FOR AIRPORT
AND SURROUNDING INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT.IMPACT.
FINANCING: $315,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$ 35,000 GENERAL FUND (A)
-32-
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
SEWER EXTENSION
AIRPORT
SUPPLY SEWER FACILITIES TO ENTIRE AIRPORT
DESIGN OF ENTIRE AIRPORT SEWER SYSTEM ,FOR
AIRPORT AND AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL SITES.
DESIGN, LAYOUT, CONSTRUCT
ALLOW FOR COMPLETE SEWAGE DISPOSAL
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
$175,500 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$ 9,750 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
$ 9,750 STATE GRANTS (D)
mcgla
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
ROAD EXTENSION TO SERVE CORPORATE PARCELS
AIRPORT
TO SERVE AS ACCESS TO SOUTHSIDE OF RAMP
EXTEND AIRPORT ACCESS ROAD AROUND EAST END
OF RAMP. LEVEL AND DRAINAGE, FENCING
DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
TO ALLOW FOR ACCESS TO CORPORATE TRACTS ON.
SOUTH SIDE OF RAMP
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
$351,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$ 19,500 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
$ 19,500 STATE GRANTS (D)
-34-
PROJECT TITLE: FIRE AND RESCUE
LOCATION: MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE FACILITY FOR FIRE FIGHTING AND
RESCUE OPERATIONS
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT DOUBLE BAY BUILDING WITH OFFICE
AND STORAGE SPACE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: FIRE PROTECTION AND RESCUE FACILITIES FOR
EMERGENCY RESPONSE IN CASE OF AN ACCIDENT
CURRENTLY DO NOT EXIST ON THE AIRPORT PROPERTY
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASED BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND ADDITIONAL
PERSONNEL TRAINING, EQUIPMENT, ETC. WILL BE
REQUIRED.
FINANCING: $ 135,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$ 15,000 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
-35-
Environment
Capital Improvement Budget
6.25D.000
S,ODD.ODO
3,750.000
.50D.4D0
i ,25D.ODt
1991-92 1992-93 1933-34. 199.4-95 1995-98
-36-
-37-
ENVIRONMENT
I
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
I
IPROJECTI
J
J
1991-92 I
1992-93 I
1993-94 J
1994-95 J
1995-96 I
1NUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM I
TOTAL COST I
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J 2-1 I
Middle Street I
S 175,200 J
J
8 175,200 J
I
J
J
J J
L i
Drainage Project J
I
H J
J
J
I
H J
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I I
J 2-2 I
I
Cape LaCroix - J
I
$6,000,000 J
I
82,000,000 J
I
$2,000,000 J
I
52,000,000 J
I
J
i
J
I J
Walker Creek J
H J
H J
H J
H J
J
J
J I
Flood Control
I I
12-3 J
I
Upper Cape La J
I
52,625,000 J
I
81,250,000 I
I
81,375,000 J
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
Croix - Phase IV J
C,D,F J
C,D,F J
C,D,F
j I
Trunk Sewers I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I I
J 2-4 J
I
S. Kingshighway J
I
8 110,000 I
I
$ 20,000 i$
I
90,000 J
I
J
I
J
I
J
J I
Sewer I
G J
G I
G I
I
J
I
I I
12-5 I
I
N. Kingshighway I
I
$ 285,000 I
I
$ 285,000 J
I
J
I
J
I
I
I
J
J J
Sewer I
C,G I
C,G J
J
J
J
I
I I
J 2-6 I
I
Walker Branch J
I
S 455,798 J
I
8 52,500 i
I
5 403,298
I
I
I
J J
Sewer I
H J
H I
H
I J
I
I
I I
J 2-7 J
I
Belleridge Sewers J
I
8 242,600
I
I I
I
J 8 10,400
I
J S 15,700
I I
J S 216,500 I
J J
I I
Phase I& 11 J
I
G
J I
J J
J G
1
J G
I
J G J
I l
I I
J 2-8 J
I
Gerhardt Lift J$
33,500
I I
J S 6,900 J
S 26,600
I
J
I
J
I I
J I
I J
Station
J G
J G J
G
I
J
J I
j I
Intercepter
I
J I
I
I
I I
I J
12-9 J
Sloan Creek
I
J $ 461,000
I i
I I
I
I
I
J S 41,000
I
I S 420,000 J
J
1 I
Sewer Extension
J C
I
J
J
I
I
J
I
J C
I
J C I
I I
I I
J 2-10 I
Lakeshore Drive
I
J S 160,300
I
J
I
J
I
J $ 14,100
I
J 8 146,200
I I
J
I J
J I
Sewer
J G
I
J
I
J
I
I G
l
J G
t
J J
1 I
I
12-11
I
J Infiltration and
I
J 8 910,000
I
J S 182,000
I
J S 182,000
I
J $ 182,000
I
I S 182,000
I I
J 8 182,000 J
J inflow Program
J I
J 1
I I
J 1
J I
I I I
I
J 2-12
I
I Clark Avenue
I
J 8 471,000
I
I
I
J $ 94,200
I
J $ 376,800
I
J
I I
J J
J
J
I Relief
I
J C
I
J
I
I C
I
I C
I
I
I
I I
1 I
-37-
Qc%19
ENVIRONMENT
I
I
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
jPROJECTj
LUMBER I
I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM I
j
TOTAL COST
1991-92 1
FISCAL YEAR
1992-93 I
FISCAL YEAR
1993-94 j
FISCAL YEAR
1994-95 j
FISCAL YEAR
1995-96 j
FISCAL YEAR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
1 2-13 I
Outfall Relief 1
5
201,000 1
5 40,200 1
5 160,800 I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
C I
I
C 1
I
C I
►
I
I
I I
I I
1
1 2-14 1
West Side Relief 1$
940,100 1
5 188,090 j
$ 752,010 j
I I
1 I
Sewer I
I
C I
I
C 1
j
C I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
1 2-15 I
I I
I
I
Landfill I
Expansion I
I
S
I
550,000 1
C 1
I
I
1$
I
I
I
50,000 1
C 1
5 50,000
C
I
I
i S 250,000
I C
I
I I
j S 200,000 j
I C I
I
1
1 2-16 I
Pneumatic Lime 1$
500,000 1
5 75,000 i
S 425,000
1
I I
I I
Add. Station 1
I
C I
I
C I
I
C
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
j 2-17 1
I I
I
College/Henderson 1
Sewer Segregation I
I
$2,650,000 1
I,C 1
I
S 55,000 1$
I I
350,000
I
I
1 5 595,000
I C
I
j 5 750,000
I C
I I
j 5 900,000 1
I C
1 2-18 I
I I
1 I
Walnut/Henderson 1$
Sewer Segregation (
j
850,000 I
C
I
I
1
I
I
j
I
I
1$ 100,000
I C
I
j S 750,000 j
I C I
i I
I
I
I
1
I I
I TOTALS i
I I
I I
$17,620,498
I
1 $4,154,690
I
I
I
1 $6,084,108
I
I
I
j $3,228,300
I
I
I
1 $1,484,900
I
I
I I
i 52,688,500 1
I I
i i
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I A
I GENERAL FUNDS
1 B
I C
1 GEN. OBL. FUNDS
j REV/PFA BONDS
1$
8,428,100
1 $1,423,290
1 52,572,010
1 $1,021,800
j 51,141,000
i 52,270,000 1
1 D
I STATE GRANTS/LOANS
1$
370,000
1$ 185,000
1 5 185,000
I E
I MOTOR FUEL TAX
I
I
I
I
I
I I
1 F
1 G
1 FED. GRANTS/LOANS
I SPEC. ASSESSMENTS
1 5
l S
200,000
676,400
j$ 100,000
1 5 156,900
1 5 100,000
1$ 116,600
1
j 5 24,500
I
1$ 161,900
I I
1 5 216,500 j
1 H
J 1
J CAP IMP SALES TAX
I OTHER
1$
1$
6,630,998
1,315,000
1 $2,052,500
I $ 237,000
1 $2,578,498
1 $ 532,000
1 $2,000,000
I $ 182,000
1
I $ 182,000
I I
I$ 182,000 I
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I i
I I
I I
I 1
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
Qc%19
PROJECT TITLE: MIDDLE STREET DRAINAGE SYSTEM
LOCATION: MIDDLE STREET
PURPOSE: TO ALLEVIATE FLOODING AT THE
INDEPENDENCE AND MIDDLE STREET
INTERSECTION.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT DETENTION BASIN WITH
STORM SEWER LINES.
UNIT OF WORK: CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PHASES 2 AND 3 OF A PLAN TO REDUCE
STREET AND PROPERTY FLOODING.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 175,200 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
SALES TAX (H)
-39-
PROJECT TITLE: CAPE LA CROIX - WALKER BRANCH
FLOOD CONTROL
LOCATION: CAPE LA CROIX AND WALKER CREEKS
PURPOSE: TO REDUCE FLOODING
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: THREE MILES CHANNELIZATION; 157 ACRE
DETENTION FACILITY; PARKS AND
RECREATION FACILITIES
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY,
AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: FLOODING IN THE CAPE LA CROIX-WALKER
CREEK WATERSHED IS CREATING SERIOUS
DAMAGE TO PROPERTY AND ENDANGERS THE
LIVES OF CAPE GIRARDEAU CITIZENS
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL AND MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT PER YEAR WILL BE REQUIRED
FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF THESE
FACILITIES.
FINANCING: $6,000,000* CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
SALES TAX (H)
*INCLUDES REMAINING LOCAL SPONSOR SHARE ONLY. BRIDGE RELOCATIONS
REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT ARE SHOWN IN TRANSPORTATION SECTION.
-40-
PROJECT TITLE: UPPER CAPE LA CROIX - PHASE IV
LOCATION: RT. W TO SAN DANGARO SUBDIVISION,
GOLF COURSE, AND CORPS DETENTION AREA
PURPOSE: TO EXTEND SEWER SERVICE TO NORTHWEST
PART OF CITY.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 4.5
MILES OF SANITARY TRUNK SEWERS
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: EXTENDS CITY SEWER SERVICES IN
NORTHWEST PART OF CITY AND WOULD
ELIMINATE FOUR SEWAGE LAGOONS AND
TWO PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: INCREASED DEPRECIATION EXPENSE.
FINANCING: $ 370,000 STATE GRANTS (D)
$ 200,000 CORPS OF ENGINEERS (F)
$2,055,000 REV BOND/SEWER FEES__(C)
-41-
PROJECT TITLE: S. KINGSHIGHWAY SEWER
LOCATION: BOTH SIDES OF HWY 61 SOUTH FROM
SOUTHERN EXPRESSWAY
PURPOSE: NEW CONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 1680
FEET OF SANITARY SEWER AND
APPURTENANCES
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REPLACEMENT OF SEPTIC SYSTEMS IN
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
AREAS. SOIL CONDITIONS ARE POORLY
SUITED TO SEPTIC SYSTEMS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 110,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-42-
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
NORTH KINGSHIGHWAY SEWER
NORTH KINGSHIGHWAY
NEW CONSTRUCTION
2800 FEET OF 8' SANITARY SEWER;
2100 FEET OF 27" SANITARY SEWER
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
INCREASE DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
$ 130,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$ 155,000 REVENUE BONDS/SEWER
FEES (C)
-43-
PROJECT TITLE: WALKER BRANCH SEWER RELOCATIONS
LOCATION: VARIOUS BETWEEN PERRYVILLE RD AND
JUNCTURE OF CAPE LA CROIX CREEK
PURPOSE: RELOCATION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF VARIOUS
SEGMENTS OF SANITARY SEWER
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REQUIRED IN CONJUNCTION WITH FLOOD
CONTROL PROJECT
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 455,798 1/2 CENT CAP IMPROVEMENT
SALES TAX (H)
-44-
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
BELLERIDGE SEWERS PHASES I & II
BELLERIDGE SEWERS PHASES I & II
NEW CONSTRUCTION
APPROXIMATELY 6800 LINEAR FEET OF 8"
SEWER WITH WYES AND MANHOLES
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
REPLACE INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS
WITH CITY SANITARY SEWER
INCREASE DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
$ 242,600 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-45-
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
GERHARDT LIFT STATION INTERCEPTER
FROM ACESS STREET TO SOUTHERN
EXPRESSWAY
NEW CONSTRUCTION
APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET OF SANITARY
SEWER, ELIMINATING THE GERHARDT LIFT
STATION
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
REDUCE MAINTENANCE COST OF SEWER
SYSTEM, ELIMINATE A FEW RESIDENTIAL
AND COMMERCIAL SEPTIC TANKS
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$ 33,500 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-46-
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
SLOAN CREEK SEWER EXTENSION
FROM BERTLING TO LEXINGTON
NEW CONSTRUCTION
EXTENSION OF SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LINE
APPROXIMATELY 4500 FEET
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND HEALTH
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$ 461,000 REVENUE BOND/SEWER FEES (C)
-47-
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
LAKESHORE DRIVE SANITARY SEWER
LAKESHORE DRIVE
REPLACE OLD EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEMS
WITH A NEW SANITARY SEWER
4780 FEET OF 8" SANITARY SEWER WITH
40 WYE CONNECTIONS
DESIGN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCT
PUBLIC HEALTH
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$ 160,300 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
-48-
PROJECT TITLE: INFILTRATION AND INFLOW PROGAM
LOCATION: VARIOUS
PURPOSE: MAJOR REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF
DETERIORATING INFRASTRUCTURE IN
SEWWER SYSTEM
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: INVESTIGATE AND ANALYZE COLLECTION
SYSTEM FOR INFLOW AND INFILTRATION
AND TAKE CORRECTIVE MEASURES TO LIMIT
UNIT OF WORK: DATA COLLECTION, ENGINEERING, REPAIR,
CONSTRUCTION
JUSTIFICATION: RECLAIM SANITARY SEWER CAPACITY AND
REDUCE OPERATION COSTS OF TREATMENT
PLANT TREATING STORM AND GROUND WATER
ELIMINATE SURCHARGING AND BUILDING
SEWER BACK-UPS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
$ 910,000 SEWER REVENUES (I)
-49-
PROJECT TITLE: CLARK AVENUE RELIEF
LOCATION: ALONG WALKER BRANCH FROM HOWELL ST.
TO PARKSITE DR.
PURPOSE: RELIEF LINE
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 5000 FEET OF 15"
DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER LINE
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: RELIEVE EXISTING OVERLOAD AND PERMIT
COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DRAINAGE
BASIN.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 471,000 REV. BOND/SEWER FEE (C)
-50-
PROJECT TITLE: OUTFALL RELIEF SEWER
LOCATION: IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM OF WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT
PURPOSE: RELIEF LINE
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 550 FEET OF 36"
DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER LINE
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: ALLOW THE PLANT TO ACCEPT THE FULL
PUMPING CAPACITY OF THE FOUR LIFT
STATIONS ALONG THE MISSISSIPPI,
REDUCING WET WEATHER BYPASSES AT
THOSE POINTS
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 201,000 REV.BONDS/SEWER FEES (C)
-51-
PROJECT TITLE: WEST SIDE RELIEF SEWER
LOCATION: SOUTH OF BRINK SUBDIVISION ALONG
CAPE LA CROIX CREEK TO WEST END BLVD.
PURPOSE: RELIEF LINE AND REPLACEMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: REPLACE A SEGMENT OF 21" DIAMETER
PIPE WITH 36" DIAMETER PIPE
APPROXIMATELY 5000 FEET
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: RELIEVE UPSTREAM SURCHARGING PROBLEMS
AND PROVIDE CAPACITY FOR FUTURE GROWTH
GENERATED BY THE EXTENSION OF UPSTREAM
TRUNK LINES
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FINANCING: $ 940,100 REV BONDS/SEWER FEES (C)
-52-
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
LANDFILL EXPANSION
LANDFILL
TO PROVIDE LAND FOR NECESSARY
EXPANSION
ACQUIRE AND DEVELOP SPACE TO MEET
PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR A RESERVE
LANDFILL.
DESIGN, LAND ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION
CURRENT LANDFILL SITE NEAR CAPACITY
RESERVE LANDFILL WILL BE NEEDED ON
CONTINUING BASIS TO GO WITH RECYCLING
AND TRANSFER STATION OPERATIONS.
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT; FAILURE TO
COMPLETE THIS PROJECT COULD RESULT IN
SIGNIFICANT OPERATING COST INCREASES.
$ 550,000 SOLID WASTE FUND REV/
PFA (C)
-53-
PROJECT TITLE: PNEUMATIC LIME ADDITION STATION
LOCATION: WASTEWATER PLANT
PURPOSE: TO MEET EPA REQUIREMENTS FOR SLUDGE
DISPOSAL.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: INSTALL EQUIPMENT TO APPLY LIME TO
SLUDGE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT.
JUSTIFICATION: TO KILL PATHOGENIC BACTERIA IN THE
CITY SLUDGE. THE PRESENT REGULATIONS
REQUIRE THIS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: ADDED COSTS WILL OCCUR FOR
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE AND LIME IN THE
TREATMENT PLANT OPERATIONS.
FINANCING: $ 500,000 REVENUE BONDS/SEWER FEES
(C)
-54-
n
PROJECT TITLE: COLLEGE/HENDERSON SEWER SEGREGATION
LOCATION: SEWER DISTRICT 5
PURPOSE: RECONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: SEGREGATION OF COMBINED STORM AND
SANITARY SEWERS DOWNSTREAM OF ALL
STORMWATER INLETS
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERNS, COMPLIANCE
WITH EPA STORMWATER QUALITY, AND
WITH MISSOURI DNR AND EPA CSO
REGULATIONS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: WILL REDUCE OPERATING COST BY
ELIMINATING GRIT/PUMPING STATION,
BUT WILL ADD DEPRECIATION EXPENSE.
FINANCING: $2,245,000 REVENUE BONDS/SEWER FEES
(C)
$ 405,000 OTHER (I)
-55-
PROJECT TITLE: WALNUT/HENDERSON SEWER SEGREGATION
LOCATION: SEWER DISTRICT 5
PURPOSE: RECONSTRUCTION
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: SEGREGATION OF COMBINED STORM AND
SANITARY SEWERS BY INSTALLING NEW
SANITARY SEWERS DOWNSTREAM OF ALL
STORMWATER INLETS
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERNS COMPLIANCE WITH
EPA STORM WATER QUALITY AND WITH
MISSOURI DNR AND EPA CSO REGULATIONS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: WILL REDUCE OPERATING COST BY
ELIMINATING A GRIT STATION, BUT WILL
INCREASE DEPRECIATION EXPENSE.
FINANCING: $ 850,000 REVENUE BONDS/SEWER
FEES (C)
-56-
Recreation & Leisure
Capital Improvement Budget
135.00
120.000
105.000
X0.000
75.000
60.000
1991-52 1992-93 19'33-91 1994--;98 1595-96
-57-
RECREATION AND LEISURE
PROPOSED PROJECTS
1PROJECTI
1
1
1991-92 1
1992-93 1
1993-94 1
1994-95
I 1995-96 1
NUMBER I
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
I TOTAL COST
I FISCAL YEAR 1
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR I
FISCAL YEAR
I FISCAL YEAR I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
1 3-1 I
Capaha Park
I S
40,500
1 S
40,500
1 I
I
I 1
I I
Shelter
1
A
1
A
I
I I
1 3-2 I
Arena Storage
I
I S
20,000
I
I S.
20,000
I I
I I
I
I
I i
I I
I I
j I
Building
I
I
1 I
I
I I
I I
1 3-3 I
Bandshell
I
1 S
45,500
I
1 $
45,500
I
1
I
I
I
I
I I
1 1
i I
Seating
1
A,I
1
A,I
I I
1 3-4 1
Arena Park
I
I $
25,000
I
I S
25,000
I
1
I
I
I
1
I I
I I
I I
1 I
Shelter
1
I
A
I
1
A
I
I
I
1
I
I
I I
! I
1 3-5 I
Various
I $
300,000
I
I $ 75,000
1 $ 75,000
1 $ 75,000
I $ 75,000 1
I I
Projects
I
A
I
1 A
I A
I A
I A I
I
I I
I I
TOTALS
I
I $
I
431,000
I
I S
I
131,000
I
I $ 75,000
I
I
I $ 75,000
I
I
I $ 75,000
I
I I
I $ 75,000 1
I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
1 i L 1 I I 1 1 1
1 A I GENERAL FUNDS I S 381,000 I S 81,000 I S 75,000 1 $ 75,000 1 S 75,000 I S 75,000 1
1 B I GEN. OBL. FUNDS I I I I 1 I I
C I REV/PFA BONDS I I I I I I I
D 1 STATE GRANTS/LOANS I I I I I I
E 1 MOTOR FUEL TAX I 1 I I I I I
F 1 FED. GRANTS/LOANS I I I I I I I
G I SPEC. ASSESSMENTS I I I I I I I
I H I CAP IMP SALES TAX I I I 1 I I I
1 I j OTHER I S 50.000 I S 50,000
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
1 I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I i I
1 I I I I I 1 i 1
PROJECT TITLE: CAPAHA SHELTER
LOCATION: CAPAHA PARK - NORTHEAST CORNER
PURPOSE: REPLACE TWO DETERIORATED SHELTERS
WITH ONE LARGE SHELTER; UPGRADE
BASKETBALL COURT AND PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF LARGE SHELTER,
30' X 601, AND INSTALL LARGE PLAY-
GROUND UNIT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: REDESIGN PARK AREA TO PROVIDE BETTER
PICNIC AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $ 40,500 GENERAL FUNDS (A)
-59-
PROJECT TITLE: STORAGE BUILDING
LOCATION: ARENA BUILDING
PURPOSE: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL STORAGE FOR
RENTAL TABLES, CHAIRS AND RISERS
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT MASONARY BUILDING ATTACHED
TO THE ARENA BUILDING, 30' X 55' WITH
OVERHEAD DOOR AND CONCRETE FLOOR.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: WITH ADDITIONAL USE OF ARENA BUILDING
AS A RECREATIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER,
THERE IS A"CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT THAT THERE IS
NOT ADEQUATE STORAGE SPACE FOR
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
$ 20,000 DONATION (I)
.=
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
BANDSHELL SEATING
CAPAHA PARK
PROVIDE ADEQUATE SEATING FOR
BANDSHELL SPECTATORS
INSTALL SEATING, CONCRETE APRON
AND WALKWAYS, NEW LIGHTING, AND
RELOCATE POWER CONTROL SOURCE
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
MUNICIPAL BAND ATTRACTS 300-500
SPECTATORS'EACH WEEK DURING SUMMER
MONTHS. PRESENT SEATING IS
INADEQUATE.
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
$ 30,000 DONATION
15,500 GENERAL FUND (A)
-61-
PROJECT TITLE: ARENA PARK SHELTERS
LOCATION: ARENA PARK
PURPOSE: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PICNIC FACILITIES
AND REPLACE OLD SHELTER.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF PARK SHELTER RANGING
IN SIZE FROM 20' X 20' TO 30' X 60'
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: OLD SHELTER DETERIORATED AND DOES
NOT FIT NEW DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: 1$ 25,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A)
-62-
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET:
FINANCING:
VARIOUS PROJECTS
SHAWNEE PARK
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ADULT SOFTBALL
FIELDS NOT IN FLOOD AREA AND EXPAND
SOCCER COMPLEX
DEVELOP A SOFTBALL COMPLEX AND
EXPAND SOCCER COMPLEX WITH ADDITIONAL
FIELDS, PARKING AND ACCESS
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
CURRENTLY AVAILABLE SOFTBALL AND
SOCCER FIELDS ARE INADEQUATE IN
NUMBER -AND QUALITY. NEW FIELDS,
INCLUDING A CONCESSION AREA, WOULD
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL REVENUE AND
CREATE A POSITIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT ON
THE COMMUNITY
ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE COSTS WILL
BE INCURRED, BUT CAN BE OFFSET WITH
FACILITY GENERATED REVENUES.
$300,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A)
"le
Community Development
Capitsl Improvement Budget
X0,000
65,000
60,000
55.000
50,060
45.400
y99t-93 1592-93 191391. 1994-9� 1955-99
-64-
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED PROJECTS
1PROJECTI
(NUMBER I
1
IMPROVEMENT ITEM I
TOTAL COST
1 1991-92 I
I FISCAL YEAR I
1992-93 1
FISCAL YEAR I
1993-94
FISCAL YEAR
I 1994-95 1
I FISCAL YEAR I
1995-96 1
FISCAL YEAR I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I
14-1 I
Public Works I
E 270,000
I E 50,000 I
S 50,000 I
S 50,000
I S 50,000 i
S 70,000 I
I I
j I
Center I
I
A
I A I
I I
A I
1
A
I A I
I I
A I
I
I I
j I
TOTALS 1
I
S 270,000
1 S 50,000 I
I I
S 50,000 1
I
S 50,000
I $ 50,000 I
I I
S 70,000 1
I
I I
I I
I I
j I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I A 1
GENERAL FUNDS 1
$ 270,000
I $ 50,000 I
$ 50,000 I
S 50,000
I S 50,000 I
S 70,000 I
I B 1
GEN. OBL. FUNDS I
1 (
I
1 I
1
I C I
REV/PFA BONDS 1
I I
I
I I
I
I D I
STATE GRANTS,LOANS I
I I
I
I I
I
I E I
MOTOR FUEL TAX I
I I
I
I
I I
I F I
FED. GRANTS,LOANS 1
I I
I
I
I I
I G I
SPEC. ASSESSMENTS I
I 1
I
I
I I
I H I
CAP IMP SALES TAX I
I
I I I
OTHER
I I
I i
I I
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
-65-
PROJECT TITLE: PUBLIC WORKS CENTER
LOCATION: 219 N. KINGSHIGHWAY
PURPOSE: EXPANSION AND IMPROVEMENT
DESCRIPTION: COMPLETE MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO
PUBLIC WORKS CENTER, INCLUDING INSULATION,
EQUIPMENT SHELTERS, PAVING, MATERIAL
STORAGE FACILITIES, LANDSCAPING, ETC.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: CURRENT BUILDINGS INEFFICIENT AND
INADEQUATE SPACE AVAILABLE FOR INSIDE
STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT.
IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET: NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
FINANCING: $270,000 GENERAL FUND (A)
LONG RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Unfunded Needs List
March 18, 1991
The following list of Capital Improvement Program Needs consists
of those projects which have been identified as major long range
facility improvements for which funding is currently not
available. No preliminary engineering or cost estimating has been
done on these projects. These projects are not listed in any
order of priority.
TRANSPORTATION
1) West End Boulevard - Cape Rock Road to Rte. 74
2) N. Sprigg - Lexington to Rt. 177
3) Mt. Auburn Rd. - Rte. 74 to Southern Expressway
4) Southern. Expressway to Mt. Auburn Rd.
5) Silver Springs Rd. - Bloomfield to Southern Expressway
6) Siemers Dr. - Bloomfield to Rte. 74
7) Hopper Rd. - Kage Rd. to I-55
8) Broadway - Clark to West End Blvd.
9) Bloomfield Rd. - Kingshighway to City Limits
10) New Madrid St. - Henderson to Perry Ave. (incl. intersection
realignment at Henderson)
11) Vantage Dr. - Percy St. to Rt. N
12) Additional Streets per major Street Plan
13) Sidewalks - Through -out the City
14) Traffic Signalization Upgrade
15) Airport Improvement Program per Airport Master Plan
16) Airport Industrial Park
17) Airport Runway Extension - Main Runway 10-28
18) Airport Terminal Area Relocation
19) Street Lighting Improvements
20) Kingshighway/Maria Louise/Cape Rock Road Intersection
21) Additional Overlay Programs
ENVIRONMENT
1) Sewer Improvement Program per Sewer Master Plan
2) Stormwater/Flood Control Projects per Stormwater Master Plan*
*currently being developed
PARRS & RECREATION
1) Land Acquisition (Floodplain areas
2) Park Restroom Facilities
3) Capaha Lagoon
4) Capaha Baseball Diamond
5) Softball Complex
6) Soccer Complex
7) Maintenance Facilities
8) Parking Facilities
9) Shelters
10) Community Center
11) Fort D Renovation
12) Golf, Course Club House
13) Golf Course Development
14) Fair Exposition Facility
15) Capaha Pool Replacement
16) Central Pool Bubble Replacement
17) Senior Citizens Center
18) Park Lighting
19) Shawnee Park Footbridge
20) Capaha Municipal Band Shelter
21) Multi-lise Play Courts
22) Park Concession Stands
23) Park Road improvements
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Growth areas)
1) Public Safety Annex/EOC/ Communications Center
2) Neighborhood & Downtown Redevelopments
3) Historic Preservation