HomeMy WebLinkAboutCIP1990-1995CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS
PROGRAM
ADOPTED-
FISCAL
1990-1995
a
"14
CITY OF
CAPE GIRARDEAU
MISSOURI
� yl
I Tort fl),
"14
CITY OF
CAPE GIRARDEAU
MISSOURI
BILL NO. 90-63
RESOLUTION NO. 50 z
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL 1990 - 1995
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Article VI, Section 6.04 of the Charter of the City
of Cape Girardeau requires a Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has presented a proposed Capital
Improvement Program to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, proper notice has been published concerning the
availability for inspection of the proposed Capital Improvement
Program and the time and place for a public hearing on the Capital
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on the
proposed Capital Improvement Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
ARTICLE 1. The City Council hereby adopts the five-year
Capital Improvement Program for fiscal 1990-1995, copies of which
are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
ARTICLE 2. The City Clerk is instructed to attach an executed
copy of this resolution to a copy of the Capital Improvement
Program for fiscal 1990-1995 and to retain such copy with the
permanent records of the City.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS Iq DAY OF 19�_,
Francis E. Rh des, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ju Dale
Depty,City Clerk
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGES
Introduction:
City Manager's Letter I
Revenue Sources VI
Summaries:
Revenue Funding Sources By Fiscal Year Graph VII
Summary of Funding Sources by Fiscal Year 1990-1995 VIII
Summary of Recommended Capital Improvement Program IX
Expenditures 1990-1995 by Program Description and
Source of Funds
Summary of Funding Sources Graph X
Capital Improvement Budget By Program Area Graph XI
Capital Improvements Program:
Transportation 1 - 30
Environment 31 - 38
Recreation and Leisure 39 - 41
Community Development 42 - 45
January 31, 1990
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Cape Girardeau
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
INTRODUCTION
In accordance with Article VI, Section 6.04 of the City Charter,
a recommended five year capital program was submitted to the
City Council on January 31, 1990. This five year plan is for
the period July 1, 1990, through June 30, 1995. On March 19,
1990, in accordance with the City Charter, the City Council
held a public hearing for the Capital Improvement Program.
Following public input, the City Council passed a resolution on
that day adopting the Capital Improvement Program. It should be
noted that this final Capital Improvement Program for fiscal
years 1990-1995 includes some changes from the proposed
document previously submitted.
The material contained within the budget document complies with
the requirements of the Charter as to program proposals, cost
estimates, methods of financing, projection of revenue sources
to meet costs, recommended time schedule for each improvement,
and any estimated impact on the annual operating budget.
In reviewing this proposed document, the City Council gave
particular emphasis to establishing priorities for projects and
realistic financing sources for implementation. The projects
included in this document are attainable without additional
revenue authorized by the voters in the community.
Each of the major advisory boards to the City Council,
department heads, and individual City Council members were
invited to submit proposed projects for consideration in this
program. In addition, a number of projects from the previous
five-year capital improvement program are also included.
BACKGROUND
The Capital Improvement Program should be considered as an
investment in the future of our community. The selection and
evaluation of capital projects is a difficult task that involves
some speculation and the ability to make estimations which, to
some extent, are based on historical perspectives.
The City Council, in 1983, formally considered and adopted a
long range Capital Improvement Program for the first time under
the current Charter requirement. This budget document process
should provide a relevant approach to identifying and
implementing important community -wide projects.
PROGRAM AND FINANCING DESCRIPTIONS
The major category program areas in which the various projects
have been described include Transportation, Environment,
Recreation and Leisure Time, and Community Development. These
major categories contain the following types of projects:
1. Transportation. The activities in this area provide for
the construction of the public streets within the City and
Municipal Airport improvements.
2. Environment. The preservation, restoration, and care of
the physical resources of the City, including the control
of solid waste, wastewater, and stormwater.
3. Recreation and Leisure Time. The programs under this area
provide the facilities for citizens to enjoyan
opportunity to participate in organized and unorganized
leisure time activities.
4. Community Development. Activities under this area include
construction of general public facilities and community
projects which have citywide effect.
We have included the types of revenue sources which are
recommended as ways to consider for the financing of the various
capital improvements. The following is a brief discussion of
what the various revenue sources include.
A. General Fund Revenues. These revenues would be included
and available on an annual appropriation basis from the
City's general "fund, which includes the receipt of
revenues from many and various sources.
B. General Obligation Bonds. These bonds are issued for the
financing of general public improvements and must be
authorized by a 4/7 majority vote of the citizens.
Approval of these bonds by the electorate also authorizes
a property tax levy to retire the debt.
II
C. Revenue/PFA Bonds. These bonds are issued for the
financing of self-supporting and general public
improvements. Revenue bonds are not included within the
limitations of indebtedness by the City and are issued
upon the authorization of a majority voter approval.
These bonds are used for enterprise funds such as water,
sewer and electric utilities, as well as the Airport and
Golf Course operations. PFA Bonds are issued upon City
Council approval based on collateralized assets and annual
lease/purchase appropriations. Cash flows for debt
retirement come from the existing revenue and from new
receipts to be generated by the facilities' operations.
D. State Grants. The City is eligible to submit grant
applications to the State of Missouri for funds that they
may have available either from their own revenue sources
or, in some cases, from revenue sources that they
administer for various federal agencies.
E. Motor Fuel Tax Receipts. This fund provides for the
receipt and disbursement of the revenues the City receives
as its portion of the State Gasoline Tax, State Motor
Vehicle Licensing, and State Motor Vehicle Sales Tax. The
revenues from this source can be used for capital, as well
as annual operating maintenance expenses as they relate to
improvements on the City's streets.
F. Federal Grants. The City is eligible to receive various
federal grants on a competitive basis from the appropriate
federal agency. This could include the Environmental
Protection Agency as it relates to wastewater
improvements, the Federal Highway Administration which
administers and distributes funds from the Federal
Gasoline Tax revenue through the Federal Aid Urban
program, or the Federal Aviation Administration for
airport improvements.
G. Special Assessments. This category provides for the
consideration of special assessments which are used for
public improvements affecting specific areas. The total
or a portion of the cost of an improvement is divided
among property owners who benefit from the project. This
type of funding can be used for diverse improvements
including streets, storm water, sanitary sewer or sidewalk
improvement.
H. Capital Improvement Sales Tax. A 1/4 cent, 3/8 cent, or
1/2 cent Sales Tax can be issued by the City for various
general types of public improvements. Such a tax requires
the approval by the electorate with simple majority. In
November, 1988, the voters of Cape Girardeau adopted a
1/4 cent sales tax effective January 1, 1990.
III
I. Other. This category is used for donations, operating
revenues from funds other than the General Fund, reserves,
proceeds from the sale of fixed assets, etc.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The total Capital Improvement Program included here is
$23,939,950. This program is $897,400.00 less than the program
approved last year, primarily due to the substantial completion
of two major trunk sewer projects.
The largest category for funding proposed improvements over the
next five years is through the Capital Improvements Sales Tax.
This provides for $8,374,000 in funding over this period of
time: This revenue source would be utilized totally for flood
control improvements.
The second largest source of funding for proposed improvements
is through the use of Federal Grants ($4,992,550). The majority
of these federal funds will be available to the City due to the
primary status of the Municipal Airport and will be spent for
improvements at the Airport.
The third largest funding source is the Special Assessments
($4,210,750), which will be used totally for street
improvements. This area is proposed to be used based on the
traditional policy in Cape Girardeau that improvements should be
paid by those property owners directly benefitting from a
project.
The Transportation Program area ($12,384,750) contains the
largest amount of proposed expenditures over the next five year
period. This is due to the extensive major street construction
and Airport Improvement that is anticipated.
The second largest program area is Environment ($10,918,200).
The most significant project in this area is the funding of the
Corps of Engineers Flood Control on Cape La Croix Creek -Walker
Branch.
The Recreation Program Area ($375,000) as proposed includes only
small ongoing improvement projects, such as new shelters,
parking, etc. Additional projects for swimming pool, softball
complex, and land acquisition are being finalized as to scope
and costs, which may be added to this program when adopted in
final form.
The Community Development Program Area ($262,000) includes only
two projects as presently proposed. The City's most recent
Community Development Block Grant Project will be completed this
year. With the uncertainty of such funding from year to year,
no block grant projects have been included.
IV
CONCLUSION
The capital improvement program adopted by the Council is an
ambitious program. However, the implementation of this program
will allow for the creation of new job opportunities, an
increase in revenues to private businesses, new businesses
growing, existing businesses expanding, increased tax revenues
to all taxing jurisdictions, and the strengthening of the
quality of life in Cape Girardeau and all of Southeast
Missouri.
It is hoped that this plan will focus attention on community
goals, needs and capabilites; reduce scheduling problems and
conflicting or overlapping projects; maintain a sound and stable
financial program; enhance opportunities for participation in
federal or state funded programs; and achieve the highest public
benefit from the expenditure of City revenue.
The projects proposed in this document are the product of many
hours of deliberative thought by a number of people within this
community. The Charter requires an annual review and revision
of the Capital Improvements Program which assures that the
program remains responsive to chancing demands and priorities.
We plan to review the various projects and funding proposals
contained within this document with City Council members in
various work sessions and the public hearing.
The final scope of this program as adopted by the City Council
following the appropriate public hearing is limited to
affordable, achievable, priority projects. The final plan
should be regarded as a sound, fiscally responsible- working
document that can and will be implemented through the annual
budget appropriation process of the City Council, support from
the citizens of Cape Girardeau for appropriate revenue sources,
and diligent action by the City staff.
JRF/AMS/j acl
v
Respectfully submitted,
®J. Ronald Fischer
City Manager
dZ'64-'*' kl-1-1�111
Alvin M. Stoverink
Assistant City Manager
REVENUE SOURCES
A. General Fund Revenues
B. General Obligation Bonds
C. Revenue/PFA Bonds
D. State Grants
E. Motor Fuel Tax Receipts
VI
F. Federal Grants
G. Special Assessments
H. Capital Improvement
Sales Tax
I. Other
Revenue Funding �S'oure es by Fiscal Ye ctr
Capital Improvement Budget
10,000,000
8,000.000
6,000.000
4,000,000
2,000,000
9939-90 1990-91 1991--92 1992-93 1993-94-
VII
OTHER ; i 113,000 ; $ 215,750 ; $ 261,480 1 ; 1 $ 328,750 1
TOTALS ; $8,336,340 ; $5,772,200 1 $4,430,750 1 $4,116,560 1 $1,264,100 1 $23,939,950 ;
, , , , ,
SUMMARY OF FUNDING
SOURCES BY FISCAL
YEAR 1990-1995
;
i
SOURCE OF FUNDS
1 1990-91
1 1991-92 1
1992-93
;
1993-94 ;
1994-95 ;
TOTAL
GENERAL
FUND REVENUES
1 $ 81,500
1 ; 101,550 1
$
94,500 1
$ 103,050 1
; 116,800 1
$ 497,400 1
GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS
;
;
1
$ 0000000 1
REVENUE
BONDS/PFA
$1,554,650
; $ 188,950 ;
;
$ 1,743,600
STATE GRANTS
'; $ 682,900
1 $ 44,050 1
$
19,500
$ 28,050 1
$ 9,750 1
$ 784,250 1
MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPT
1 $ 758,194
1 $ 726,683 1
$
578,683 1
$ 352,590 1
$ 592,500 1
$ 3,008,650
FEDERAL
GRANTS
$1,135,530
; $2,352,650
$
351,000 ;
$ 977,870 ;
$ 175,500 ;
; 4,992,550 ;
SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS
1 $1,786,566
1 $ 442,567 1
$
787,067 1
$ 805,000 1
$ 369,550 1
$ 4,210,750 1
CAPiTAL
iMPROVEMENT SALES
TAX ; ;2,224,000
1 $1,700,000 1
$2,600,000
1
$1,850,000 1
1
$ 8,374,000 1
OTHER ; i 113,000 ; $ 215,750 ; $ 261,480 1 ; 1 $ 328,750 1
TOTALS ; $8,336,340 ; $5,772,200 1 $4,430,750 1 $4,116,560 1 $1,264,100 1 $23,939,950 ;
, , , , ,
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ;
EXPENDITURES 1990-1995 BY PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL 1 GENERAL 1 REVENUE 1 ;MOTOR FUEL CAPITAL
PROGRAM ; FUND # OBLiGAT.; BONDS/ ; STATE 1 TAX 1 FEDERAL 1 SPECIAL ;IMPROVEMENT! ;
;DESCRIPTION ;REVENUES 1 BONDS I PFA 1 GRANTS 1 RECEIPTS 1 GRANTS ;ASSESSMENT ; SALES TAX 1 OTHER 1 TOTAL 1
t 1 1 1 1 t 1 t 1 1 I 1
;TRANSPORT, ;$122,400 ; ;5 980,400 1$ 284,250 153,008,650 153,549,550 1$4,210,750 1 ;$ 228,750 ;$12,384,750;
;ENVIRONMENT ; 1 IS 601,200 1$ 500,000 1 ;$1,443,000 1 1$8,374,000 1 1$10,918,2001
'RECREATION ; 1
AND ;5375,000 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ;$ 375,0001
LEISURE
;COMMUNITY 1 $162,000 1 1 1 1 ;$ 100,000 1$ 262,0001
11n �
��IctiELOPMEMT
TOTALS ;$497,400 1 1$1,743,600 1$ 784,250 1$3,008,650 1$4,992,550 1$4,210,750 1$8,374,000 1$ 328,750 1$23,939,9501
IX
Summary of .Funding Sources
Capital Improvement Budget
FEDERAL
GRANTS 21 %
SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS 18%
OTHER
X
MOTOR FUEL
TAX RECEIPT 13%
STATE
GRANTS 3%
REVENUE
BON DS/PFA 7%
GENERAL
FUND REVENUES 2%
CAP IMP
SALES TAX 35%
Capital Improvement Budget
By Program, Area
R ECR EATION
AND LEISURE 2%
XI
L 1YII%Vl Nryl"\1
46%
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT 1%
Transportation
C apq*.t al Improvement Budget
5,000.000
4,000000
3,000.000
2,ODDODO
1,000.000
7990-9y 1991-92 1992-+93 19994 1994-95
-1-
TRANSPORTATION
i-5 Clark $ 227,500 ; $ 227,500 ;
Avenue
i-6 ; Brucner Street ; $ 64,100 ; ; ; 64,100
3Asahalt ,
1-7 raving ; ; 750,000 ; ; 150,000 ; $ 150,000 ; $ 150,000 ; $ 150,000 1 $ 150,000
Program ;
,
1-8 ; Broadway ; $ 94,600 ; $ 94,600 ;
i ; Widening
i-9 Corporate ; $ 480,000 ; $ 480,000
;
Circle Drive
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
;PROJECT;
i -i0 ; North Spring ; $ 650,000 ; ; ;
;
1990-91 ;
1991-92 ;
1992-93
1 1993-94 ; 1994-95
,NUMBER ;
iMPROVEMENT ITEM
; TOTAL COST
FISCAL YEAR !
FISCAL YEAR ;
FISCAL YEAR
; FISCAL YEAR ; FISCAL YEAR
i-1 ;
Lexington
; $2,450,000
; $1,000,000
$ 350,000 ;
$ 400,000
; $ 700,000 ; ;
;
Street
Hopper Road
;
1-2 ;
Bridge 1
$1,296,110
;
; 665,750
$ 630,360
;
Extension to
1 1
Kaae Road
i i
i
i i
i
i i
1-3 ;
Scrioa Street
; $ 502,640
; $ 502,640 ;
Bridge
1-4 ;
Street Overlay
; $ 750,000
; $ i50,000 ;
$ 150,000 ;
$ 150,000
; $ 150,000 1 $ 150,000 ;
i-5 Clark $ 227,500 ; $ 227,500 ;
Avenue
i-6 ; Brucner Street ; $ 64,100 ; ; ; 64,100
3Asahalt ,
1-7 raving ; ; 750,000 ; ; 150,000 ; $ 150,000 ; $ 150,000 ; $ 150,000 1 $ 150,000
Program ;
,
1-8 ; Broadway ; $ 94,600 ; $ 94,600 ;
i ; Widening
i -i2 ; Siemers drive 1 $ 400,000 ; $ 400,000
,
i -i3 Vantage Drive ; $ 55,000 F 55,000
-2-
i-9 Corporate ; $ 480,000 ; $ 480,000
;
Circle Drive
i -i0 ; North Spring ; $ 650,000 ; ; ;
;
; $ 650,000 ;
i Extension
i -ii ; Perryville Road $ 100,000 $ 20,000 $ 680,000
i -i2 ; Siemers drive 1 $ 400,000 ; $ 400,000
,
i -i3 Vantage Drive ; $ 55,000 F 55,000
-2-
TRANSPORTATION
i -i6 i Airport ; $ 1301000 . ; ; ; 130,000
Fuei Depot
1-22
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
;PRWECT;
$ 570,300
; ; 1990-91
1991-92 ; 1992-93 1993-94 ; 1994-95 ;
,
;NUMBER-',
'IMPROVEMENT ITEM
; TOTAL COST ; FISCAL YEAR ;
FISCAL YEAR ; FISCAL YEAR ; FISCAL YEAR ; FISCAL YEAR ;
i i -i4 ;
Twin Trees
; $ 95,000 ; ; 95,000
$ 862,400
; $ 431,200
Briage
;
; Taxiway
1-23
Signage
$
83,600 ; # 83,600
;
1-15 i
Airport
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
Drainage
Airport
;
i -i6 i Airport ; $ 1301000 . ; ; ; 130,000
Fuei Depot
i -2i Airport ; # 150,000 $ 350,000 ;
Water System
1-22
i.- P
hangars
;
$ 570,300
; $ 570,300
Roaa
,
Extension
,
i -i8
Ramp ano
;
$ 862,400
; $ 431,200
; $ 431,200
; Taxiway
1-23
Signage
$
83,600 ; # 83,600
;
,
,
Airport
Airport
;
i -i9
; Lana
;
; 120,000
; $ 120,000
195,000 ;
; ; ; $ 195,000 ;
Acquisition
extension
i
Airport
i i-25
i-20
Terminai
;
$ 576,000
; $ 288,000 ; $ 288,000
; ;
Buiiaing
i -2i Airport ; # 150,000 $ 350,000 ;
Water System
—3—
1-22
Sliver Springs
; ;
470,000 ; ; 470,000
;
Roaa
,
Extension
,
1-23
Signage
$
83,600 ; # 83,600
;
,
Airport
;
i-24
Sewer
$
195,000 ;
; ; ; $ 195,000 ;
extension
i i-25
i Airport Roao
; S
390,000
; ; $ 390,000
; Extension
,
—3—
TRANSPORTATION
-4-
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
;PRO,iECT!
1
1990-91
1991-92 1
1992-93
1 1993-94
1
1994-95
;NUMBER
iMPROYEMENT ITEM
TOTAL COST 1
FISCAL YEAR
; FISCAL YEAR ;
FISCAL YEAR
' FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL
YEAR '
hon -precision
1
1
1
i
Marking
1;
22,500 1;
22,500.
1 1
1
1
1
1 Runway
1
1
1
1
1
i
!
TOTALS
,
1 i
1 ;12,384,750 1
;4,674,140
i i
1 ;2,554,100 1
;1,755,750
i
1 ;2,191,560
i i
1 ;1,209,100 1
A,
1 ;
122,400 1
; 61500
1 ; 26,550 1
; 19,500
1 ; 28,050
1 ;
41,800 1
C
1;
980,400 1;
791,450
1; 188,950 1
1
1
1
I 0
1 S
284,250 1;
182,900
1; 44,050 1;
19,500
1; 28,050
1;
9,750 1
E
1 ;
3,008,650 1
$ 758,194
1 S 726,683 1
; 578,683
1 ; 352,590
1 ;
592,500 1
F
1 ;
3,549,550 1
;1,135,530
1 ; 909,650 1
; 351,000
1 ; 977,870
1 ;
175,500 1
G
1 ;
4,210,750 1
;1,786,566
1 ; 442,567 1
; 787,067
1 ; 805,000
1 ;
389,550 1
I
1;
228,750 1;
13,000
1; 215,750 1
1
1
1
t
1
I
I
-4-
t
1
TRANSPORTATION
1
PROA CT TITLE:
LEXINGTON STREET
LOCATION:
KINGSHIGHWAY TO ROUTE 177
PURPOSE:
1
PROVIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEXINGTON AS AN ARTERIAL STREET
RUNNING EAST AND WEST ACROSS THE NORTH PART OF THE CITY.
PnYSiCAL DESCRIPTION:
i7,424 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE AND ASPHALT PAVEMENT 44 FEET WIDE
WITH CURBS. CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE OVER CAPE LACROIX CREEK. ;
1
;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT ;
,;USTIFICATION:
PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY TRAFFIC FLOW EAST/WEST THROUGH ;
THE NORTH PART OF THE CITY. ;
FINANCING:
$ 175,000 STATE GRANTS (D) 1
$ 423,800 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E) ;
$ 480,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F) ;
871,200 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G) ;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
hET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SiGNIFiCANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
—5—
d
;
;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
i iNCREASE REVENUE 5
,
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT ;
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
TRANSPORTATION
,
;
;
PROJECT TITLE:
HOPPER ROAD BRIDGE AND EXTENSION TO KAGE ROAD
;
LOCATION:
HOPPER ROAD
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BRIDGE ON HOPPER ROAD EAST OF
MOUNT AUBURN
ROAD AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF HOPPER ROAD FROM JUST WEST OF THE
HAWTHORNE
;
SCHOOL PROPERTY TO MOUNT AUBURN ROAD. PROVIDE HOPPER ROAD EXTENSION TO KAGE
ROAD.;
P"YSICAL DESCRIPTION:
110 LINEAR FOOT BRIDGE OVER CAPE LACROIX CREEK WITH A MINIMUM OF
TWO LANES.
1,650 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT WITH CURBS, 36
FEET WIDE.
dNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
;
JUSTIFICATION:
BRIDGE 15 FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE, TOO NARROW FOR EXISTING TRAFFIC
VOLUME AND
NO ROOM FOR PEDESTRIAN USE. EXTEND EXISTING HIGH TYPE PAVEMENT ON HOPPER
;
;
ROAD TO HANDLE INCREASED TRAFFIC AND TO MATCH BRIDGE REPLACEMENT.
FINANCING:
$293,340 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$472,770 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$530,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
d
;
;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
i iNCREASE REVENUE 5
,
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT ;
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
f
TRANSPORTATION ;
PROJECT TITLE: SPRIGG STREET PHASE 111
LOCATION: SPRIGG STREET
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE CAPE LA CROIX BRIDGE AT SOUTH
SPRIGG STREET.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: APPROXIMATELY 110 LINEAR FOOT TWO-LANE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES. ;
,
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY
JUSTIFICATION: BRIDGE IS FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE, NEARING STRUCTURAL OBSOLESCENCE. IT
SERVES SEVERAL MAJOR INDUSTRIES AND WILL SERVE THE WASTE TRANSFER
SITE FOR THE CITY.
FINANCING: $125,660 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$376,980 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE S
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET iMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
—7—
S
5
TRANSPORTATION
'
�
PROJECT TITLE:
STREET OVERLAY
r
LOCATION:
CITYNiDE
,
,
PURPOSE:
PROVIDES FOR CONTINUING MAJOR
STREET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FOR
THE OVERLAY OF 7 MILES OF LOCAL
AND COLLECTOR ASPHALT STREETS.
PnYSiCAL DESCRIPTION:
MILLING OR OTHER SURFACE PROFILING
METHOD AND ASPHALT OVERLAY. '
,
,
UNIT OF WORK:
CONSTRUCT
,
,,USTiFiCAT10N:
COST EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE TO
PREVENT NEED FOR FUTURE RECONSTRUCTION ;
i
OF ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
;
FINANCING:
$750,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX (E)
;
,
,
,
i
IMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET
,
;
iNCREASE REVENUE
S
DECREASE REVENUE
SET REVENUE IMPACT
;
SALARY COSTS
;
OTHER EXPENSE
,
hET EXPENSE IMPACT
S
;
sET iMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET
Tni5 KihD OF PROGRAMMED
MAINTENANCE SHOULD SAVE ABOUT $7
FOR EVERY $I SPENT
ih FUT16RE RECONSTRUCTION
i
COSTS,
i
;
TRANSPORTATION ;
PROJECT TITLE:
CLARK AVENUE ;
LOCATION:
FROM LOMBARDO DRIVE TO MARIETTA STREET ;
PURPOSE:
TO PAVE A SECTION OF STREET PREVIOUSLY PLATTED.
a
,
?nYSiCAL DESCRIPTION:
PAVING APPROXIMATELY 1640 FEET FROM LOMBARDO DRIVE TO MARIETTA
STREET WITH ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE STRUCTURES,
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
WILL CONNECT TWO ENDS OF CLARK STREET, PROVIDING A SUB—COLLECTOR
ROUTE NORTH AND SOUTH ;
FINANCING:
$227,500 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G) ;
,
,
t
;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
s
,
!SET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET s
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
;
;
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE: BRUCHER STREET
LOCATION: BERTLING STREET TO BUTLER STREET ;
PURPOSE: PAVE AN EXISTING GRAVEL STREET
,
PnYSiCAL DESCRIPTION: PAVING, 20' WIDE FOR 915' AND STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS '
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
I
jUSTIFICATION: LOWER THE MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR THIS STREET AND IMPROVE THIS
I STREET TO A LEVEL SIMILAR TO THE SURROUNDING AREA ;
I
FINANCING: $ 32,050 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
32,050 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
,
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
S
S
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
,
,
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
,
;
—10—
1
TPANSPORTATj N
PROJECT TITLE:
i" ASPHALT PAVING PROGRAM ;
LOCATION:
VARIOUS CITY STREETS ;
PURPOSE:
TO SURFACE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL GRAVEL STREETS.
PiiYSiCAI DESCRIPTiQt
TWENTY FOOT (20') WIDE HOT MIX ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SURFACING ON EXISTING ;
GRAVEL STREET BASE WHERE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE CAN BE ASSURED. ;
,
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ;
t
'
oUSTIFICATION:
REDUCE GRAVEL STREET MAINTENANCE COSTS. ENHANCE NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY. ;
FINANCING:
$750,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
,
,
iNCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE iMPACT
n�T iMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
— 11 —
S
S -8.000
$ +8,000
-i2-
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE:
BROADWAY WIDENING
LOCATION:
FROM U.S. 61 TO CLARK AVENUE
;
,
PURPOSE:
PROVIDES FOR A HIGHER VOLUME OF TRAFFIC
MOVEMENT THROUGH THE ;
BROADWAY/U.S. 61 INTERSECTION.
;
' PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
A CONCRETE WIDENING OF 14` WITH SHOULDER
AND EXTENSION OF THE
i
BOX CULVERT OVER WALKER CREEK.
,
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:
TRAFFIC SAFETY AND REDUCTION OF DELAYS.
WORK WOULD FIT IN WITH IMPROVEMENTS ;
THAT THE STATE HAS PLANNED FOR BROADWAY/U.S.
61 INTERSECTION. ;
,
FINANCING:
$94,600 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
;
,
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
1
,
t
,
iNCREASE REVENUE
,
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE
IMPACT
,
,
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT
;
,rET iMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET
$ '
,
,
,
NO SiGNIFICANT IMPACT
,
ON OPERATING BUDGET.
!
,
,
-i2-
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE: CORPORATE CIRCLE DRIVE
LOCATION: HIGHWAY 74 TO RUSMAR AVENUE
PURPOSE: TO REPLACE MINNESOTA AVENUE AS A LOCAL STREET SERVING AN
INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL AREA.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 2400 LINEAR FEET OF 40 FOOT WIDE ASPHALT OR CONCRETE
PAVEMENT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: ADDITIONAL NORTH/SOUTH CONNECTOR IS NEEDED FOR PRIVATE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY PLANNED.
FINANCING: $480,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
YET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-13-
S
,
,
TRANSPORTATION +
PROJECT TITLE:
NORTH SPRIGG EXTENSION
LOCATION:
NORTH SPRIGG STREET
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE A NORTH -SOUTH LINK FOR VARIOUS EAST -WEST ARTERIAL STREETS TO THE ;
DOWNTOWN AREA. EXTEND NORTH SPRIGG FROM BERTLING TO CONNECT WITH THE
LEXINGTONJMEUDY LANE ARTERIAL.
r'tiYSICAI DESCRIPTION:
4,150 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT,
44 FEET WIDE WITH CURBS. ,
,
,
UNIT Of WORK:
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
1
oUSiIFICATION:
PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY FLOW Of TRAFFIC IN THE COMMUNITY.
,
FINANCING:
$201,500 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
$442,500 MOTOR FUEL TAX (E) I
,
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE g
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
,
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT ;
h%T IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
g
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
,
—14—
-15-
TRANSPORTATION
'
PROJECT TITLE:
PERRYVILLE ROAD
LOCATION:
PERRYVILLE ROAD
;
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF PERRYVILLE ROAD
AS COLLECTOR STREET
NORTH TO THE CITY LIMITS.
;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
THIS PROJECT 15 l MILE AND INCLUDES WIDENING
AND ADDING
CURBS AND ;
GUTTERS.
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
_
jUSTiFICATiON:
INCREASE THE SERVICE LEVEL OF THE ROADWAY TO
HANDLE
ADDITIONAL ;
TRAFFIC VOLUMES.
FINANCING:
$242,500 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
;
$228,750 MOTOR FUEL (E)
$228,750 OTHER (1)
,
;
;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
,
iNCREASE REVENUE
S
DECREASE REVENUE
;
NET REVENUE
IMPACT
3
SALARY COSTS
;
,
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT
$
;
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET
S
78.000
,
-15-
1
,
TRANSPORTATION '
;
1
PROJECT TITLE:
SIEMERS DRIVE ;
LOCATION:
CAPE WEST BUSINESS PARK ;
PURPOSE:
TO COMPLETE COLLECTOR STREET FROM BLOOMFIELD TO RTE. K. ;
PdYSiCAL DESCRIPTION:
PAVING OF SIEMERS DRIVE, APPROXIAMTELY 2920' AND AN UNNAMED STREET, ;
APPROXIMATELY 554', 32' WIDE WITH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE, ;
CONSTRUCTION OF BOX CULVERT AND OTHER ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE ;
IMPROVEMENTS ;
uN1T OF WORK:
CONSTRUCTION ;
,;UST1FiCATION:
WILL ENHANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PROVIDE ESSENTIAL THROUGH ;
STREET CONSTRUCTION IN A NEWLY ANNEXED AREA ;
jFiNANCING:
S 400,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
,
,
,
1
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ;
1
,
1
,
iNCREASE REVENUE
_ ;
DECREASE REVENUE
;
1
,
NET REVENUE
IMPACT S
i
SALARY COSTS
;
OTHER EXPENSE
'
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT $ '
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING
1
BUDGET '
'
NO SIGNiFICANT IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET, ;
1
1
,
1
,
—16—
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE ;
ui CREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE iMPACT g
SALARY COSTS
v^TiER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT ;
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
— 17—
TRANSPORTATION ;
PROJECT TITLE:
VANTAGE DRIVE
,
0CATION:
NO RTE. K NORTHERLY TO U.S. HIGHWAY bl
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE AN OUTER ROAD BELT ALONG I-55 AND CONNECTING NORTHERN ARTERIAL ROUTES
,
PnYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING TO ESTABLISH A RIGHT-OF-WAY CORRIDOR FOR
VANTAGE DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE CITY'S MASTER STREET PLAN
OhiT OF WORK:
SURVEY, LEGAL AND ENGINEERING
jUSTIFICATION:
ORDERLY GROWTH ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED 1987 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ;
Fi NANCING:
$ 55,000.00 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (F)
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE ;
ui CREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE iMPACT g
SALARY COSTS
v^TiER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT ;
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
— 17—
iii
,
TRANSPORTATION
i
I
PROJECT TITLE:
TWIN TREES BRIDGE
;
LOCATION:
ON EAST CAPE ROCK OVER JUDEN CREEK
PURPOSE:
REPLACEMENT
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
LIMITED LOAD LIMIT; ONE LANE BRIDGE;
TIMBER OR STEEL SUPERSTRUCTURE; ;
PILING SUBSTRUCTURE
;
uNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
;
JUSTIFICATION:
RESTORE VEHICLE, BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN
TRAFFIC THROUGH ;
TWIN TREES PARK TO HIGHWAY 177
;
FINANCING:
$ 95,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX (E)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
,
iNCREASE REVENUE
f
,
DECREASE REVENUE
_
NET PEVENUE
IMPACT
$
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT
;
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
S ;
,
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET.
,
,
iii
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
-19-
S
S
i
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE:
AIPORT DRAINAGE ;
,
LOCATION:
CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ;
PURPOSE:
FLOOD CONTROL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
CLEAN DRAINS AND DRAINAGE DITCHES; BUILD NEW DRAINAGE SYSTEM ;
FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS ;
!
,
UNIT OF WORK:
PREPARE COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:
TO HELP CONTROL STANDING WATER PROBLEMS AND PROTECT FACILITIES '
FROM DETERIORATION AS A RESULT OF MOISTURE PENETRATION
!
FINANCING:
; 40,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
,
5 5,000 STATE GRANTS (0) ;
5,000 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A) ;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
-19-
S
S
i
—20—
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE:
FUEL DEPOT
LOCATION:
CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPOT
PURPOSE:
TO UPDATE AND SECURE FUELING PIT
;
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
BUILD NEW FUEL STORAGE AREA WITH ABOVE—GROUND TANKS AND
FUEL FLOW MONITORING
' UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:
TO BECOME FUEL DISTRIBUTING POINT FOR
SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES
AND TO INCREASE REVENUES; IMPROVE THE
SAFETY OF THIS FACILITY
FINANCING:
$117,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
'
t
$ 6,500 STATE GRANTS (0)
6,500 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
9
,
;
1
i'
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
;
1
iNCREASE REVENUE
;
;
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE
IMPACT
; ;
SALARY COSTS
;
OTHER EXPENSE
s
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT
,
$ '
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET
$
,
,
,
—20—
,
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE:
HANGARS
,
I
LOCATION:
CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE:
TO ADD STORAGE FACILITIES ;
i
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
I
CONSTRUCT 2 T -HANGARS (20 UNITS) ALONG WITH ASSOCIATED TAXIWAYS AND ;
ONE (1) CORPORATE HANGAR WITH ASSOCIATED OFFICE SPACE FOR RENTAL ;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:
FOR EVENTUAL REVENUES DERIVED FROM RENTALS AND TO ATTRACT '
ADDITIONAL RASED AIRCRAFT ;
I
FINANCING:
$ 66,600 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
i 3,700 STATE GRANTS (D)
$500,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
;
I
'
I
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE ;
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
S
S
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
-21-
1
1
j
!
TRANSPORTATION
,
PROJECT TITLE:
RAMP AND TAXIWAY CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION:
CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE:
INCREASE PARKING SPACE FOR AIRCRAFT --BETTER
TRAFFIC FLOW ;
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
INCREASE GENERAL AVIATION RAMP SOUTH BY APPROXIMATELY
150';
INSTALL TAXIWAY CONNECTING RAMP TO TAXIWAY
C ;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
;
JUSTIFICATION:
TO ADD MORE EASE AND SAFETY IN HANDLING OF
AIRCRAFT ON ;
THE GROUND
FINANCING:
$776,200 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
43,100 STATE GRANTS (0)
43,100 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
;
;
s
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
;
;
INCREASE REVENUE
;
DECREASE REVENUE
,
NET REVENUE
IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
,
OTHER EXPENSE
;
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT
S ,
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET
s
,
,
t
j
_22_
TRANSPORTATION
'
PROJECT TITLE: LAND ACQUISITION
LOCATION: CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: FOR AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK, FUTURE RUNWAY EXTENTION AND LAND USE CONTROLS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PURCHASE OF APPROXIMATELY 400 ACRES OF LAND
UNIT OF WORK: ACQUIRE LAND
dUSTIFiCATION: TO HAVE AMPLE AREA FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS AND AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT AS
WELL AS PROVIDE A MEANS OF CONTROLLING DEVELOPMENT IN ADJACENT AREAS TO
INSURE COMPATIBILITY WITH AVIATION ACTIVITY
FINANCING: 1120,000 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
INCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
i
ITO $L RETIRED THROUGH GENERAL FUND TRANSFERS
—23—
S
—24—
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE:
RENOVATE OR BUILD TERMINAL BUILDING
LOCATION:
CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
�._. PURPOSE:
TO HAVE A MORE FUNCTIONAL E ATTRACTIVE FACILITY ,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
RENOVATE EXISTING BUILDING TO MAKE IT MORE FUNCTIONAL OR BUILD A NEW
FACILITY AND RESTRUCTURE PARKING WITH NEW ENTRANCE ROAD ALIGNMENT, LIGHTING,
AND LANDSCAPING I
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:
TO MAKE THE FACILITY MORE ATTRACTIVE AND FUNCTIONAL FOR FUTURE ;
ATTRACTION OF AIRLINE SERVICE AND OFFICE RENTALS ;
FINANCING:
$233,100 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$342,900 REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C) '
;
I
;
,
,
;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
,
;
INCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
Wr REVENUE
IMPACT g
SALARY COSTS
I
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT g
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET
'TO aE RETIRED THROUGH
GENERAL FUND TRANSFERS
,
—24—
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
-25-
$
s
TRANSPORTATION
;
' PROJECT TITLE:
WATER SYSTEM
LOCATION:
AIRPORT
' PURPOSE:
TO IMPROVE QUALITY, QUANTITY, AND RELIABILITY OF WATER SYSTEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
RESTRUCTURE ENTIRE WATER SYSTEM AND REBUILD DETERIORATED OR UNDERSIZED
DISTRIBUTION LINES
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:
TO ENSURE PROPER WATER SUPPLY FOR ENTIRE AIRPORT AND AIRPORT ;
INDUSTRIAL PARK, BOTH FOR POTABLE WATER USAGE AND FIRE FLOWS
FINANCING:
$315,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$ 17,500 STATE GRANTS (D)
$ i7,50Q REVENUE/PFA BONDS (C)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
-25-
$
s
;
,
1
,
1
1
,
INCREASE REVENUE `
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
$
$
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
—26—
TRANSPORTATION ;
PROJECT TITLE:
SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
,
LOCATION:
SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR THE CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF SILVER SPRINGS ROAD AS A COLLECTOR ;
STREET. CONSTRUCTION NORTH FROM ROUTE K TO THE COMPLETED SECTION SOUTH OF ;
I
INDEPENDENCE.
/
r'nYSiCAL DESCRIPTION:
2,100 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT 40 FEET WIDE WITH CURBS. ;
1
1
,
UNIT OF WORK:
1
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
I
,
JUSTIFICATION:
,
TO EXTEND PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY TRAFFIC FLOW.
FINANCING:
$470,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G) ;
,
;
,
1
,
1
1
,
INCREASE REVENUE `
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
$
$
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
—26—
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET 5
—27—
TRANSPORTATION
1
PROJECT TITLE:
SIGNAGE '
;
LOCATION:
AIRPORT
t
1
PURPOSE:
TO SUPPLY DIRECTIONAL INFORMATION ;
;
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
INSTALLATION OF INSTRUCTIONAL SIGNS ON AIRPORT AIRSIDE
UNIT OF STORK:
INSTALLATION
JUSTIFICATION:
THE FAA HAS ESTABLISHED RULES THAT AIRPORTS MUST ADHERE TO
FOR INFORMATIONAL SIGNAGE ;
FINANCING:
s 75,20Q FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
$ 4,200 STATE GRANTS (D)
$ 4,200 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A) ;
,
i
;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET 5
—27—
i
i
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE:
SEWER EXTENSION
;
LOCATION:
AIRPORT
, PURPOSE:
SUPPLY SEWER FACILITIES TO ENTIRE AIRPORT
,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
DESIGN OF ENTIRE AIRPORT SEWER SYSTEM FOR AIRPORT AND AIRPORT ;
INDUSTRIAL SITE ;
;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, LAYOUT, CONSTRUCT
;
JUSTIFICATION:
ALLOW FOR COMPLETE SEWAGE DISPOSAL
,
FINANCING:
$175,500 FEDERAL GRANTS (F) ;
$ 9,750 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A) ;
9,750 STATE GRANTS (D) ;
a
,
,
t
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ;
iNCREASE REVENUE
;
,
DECREASE REVENUE
;
NET REVENUE
IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT S I
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET ;
,
,
i
,
,
,
1
ENO
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
S
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET iMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
-29-
,
TRANSPORTATION
,
PROJECT TITLE:
ROAD EXTENSION TO SERVE CORPORATE PARCELS ;
LOCATION:
AIRPORT
PURPOSE:
TO SERVE AS ACCESS TO SOUTHSIDE OF RAMP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
EXTEND AIRPORT ACCESS ROAD AROUND EAST END OF RAMP. LEVEL AND
DRAINAGE, FENCING
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, CONSTRUCT ;
vUSTiFiCATION:
TO ALLOW FOR ACCESS TO CORPORATE TRACTS ON SOUTH SIDE OF RAMP
FINANCING:
$351,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F) ;
$ 19,500 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
$ 19,500 STATE GRANTS (D)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
S
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET iMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
-29-
i
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE:
NON -PRECISION MARKING RUNWAY 2/20
i LOCATION:
AIRPORT
PURPOSE:
COMPLY WITH FAA REGULATIONS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PAINT CENTERLINE, RUNWAY HOLDLINES, REPLACE LIGHTING GLOBES ,
UNIT OF WORK:
PAINTING, INSTALLATION
JUSTIFICATION:
TO MAINTAIN FAR 139 STIPULATIONS
,
,
FINANCING:
$ 2,300 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
20,200 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE ;
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT g
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET g
-30-
Envz ronment
Capit c&l Improvement Budge t
+4,000.000
3,ODD.ODO
?,000.000
1,0DD.ODO
0
1990-91 1991-92 19 -93 1993-94 1991-95
-31-
ENVIRONMENT
,
-32-
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
+
;PROJECT;
1990-91
; 1991-92
1
1992-93
1 1993-94
; 1994-95 ;
;NUMBER 1
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
TOTAL COST
FISCAL YEAR 1
FISCAL YEAR ;
FISCAL YEAR
1 FISCAL YEAR
; FISCAL YEAR
; 3-i
;
Southwest Trunk 6
1
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Relief Sanitary
;
Sewer - Phase 11
;
3-2
1
Cape LaCroix -
1
$7,850,000
1
$1,700,000
1 $1,700,000
1
$2,600,000
1 $1,850,000
1 ;
Walker Creek
1
1
1
1
;
Flood Control
1
+
+
+
+
1 3-3
Middle Street
1$
200,000
1$
100,000
1
Drainage System
1
1
1 1
3-4
1
Reo Star
1
$- 324,000
1$
324,000
1
1
1
1 1
Drainage
1
1
1
1
1 1
3-5
i
Rt. K
1;
101,200
$ 101,200
1
gunk Sewer
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
3-6
;
San Danoaro-
1
$1,443,000
1
1 $1,443,000
1
Sewer
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TOTALS
1
$10,918,200
1
$3,325,200
1 $3,143,000
1
$2,600,000
1 $1,850,000
1 1
C-
$ 601,200
1$
-601,200
1
1 1
D
1$
500,000
$ 500,000
1
1
1
1 1
E
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
F
i
$1,443,000
i
i $1,443,000
;
i
i i
ii
;
$ 8,374,000
1
$2,124,000
; $1,700,000
;
$2,600,000
; $1,850,000
; 1
,
-32-
ENVIRONMENT
PROJECT TITLE: SOUTHWEST TRUNK AND RELIEF SANITARY SEWER - PHASE 11
LOCATION: BLOOMFIELD ROAD/1-55 AREA TO ROUTE 74
PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE NECESSARY CAPACITY IN THE BLOOMFIELD ROAD AND 1-55 DRAINAGE AREA
FOR DEVELOPMENT AND TO SERVE DEVELOPING AREA ALONG ROUTE 74.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: A NEW TRUNK SEWER OF 15" TO 36" SIZE.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: EXISTING PUMP STATION AND SEWER LINE IS AT CAPACITY NOW. THIS CONDITION
WILL PREVENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA WEST OF SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
AND SOUTH OF ROUTE K. MAJOR AREA IN SOUTHWEST PART OF CITY CURRENTLY NOT
SERVED. NEW LINE WILL ELIMINATE 1 LIFT STATION AND 1 LAGOON.
FINANCING: S 500,000 STATE GRANTS (D)
S 500,000 PFA BONDS (C)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET i11PACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
3
-33-
S
S
S
1
1
ENVIRONMENT
,
;
PROJECT TITLE:
CAPE LACROIX - WALKER CREEK FLOOD CONTROL
;
LOCATION:
CAPE LACR01X AND WALKER CREEKS
;
PURPOSE:
TO REDUCE FLOODING.
!
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
THREE MILES CHANNELIZATION; 157 ACRE DETENTION
FACILITY; BRIDGE ;
REPLACEMENTS; PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES.
;
UNIT OF WORK:
ACQUIRE RIGHT—OF—WAY, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCT
;
JUSTIFICATION:
FLOODING IN THE CAPE LACROIX - WALKER CREEK WATERSHED
IS CREATING SERIOUS ;
DAMAGE TO PROPERTY AND ENDANGERS THE LIVES OF
CAPE GIRARDEAU CITIZENS. ;
FINANCING:
$7,650,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SALES TAX (H)
,
1
,
,
-
I
' THIS IS THE
LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST ONLY.
I
'
+
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
1
INCREASE REVENUE
$
;
DECREASE REVENUE
+
1
SET REVENUE
IMPACT
s ;
+ SALARY COSTS
;
OTHER EXPENSE
+
_
NET EXPENSE
18PACT
$ 50,000 ;
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET
; -50,000 ;
1
,
,
1
34
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE ;
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
iNCREASE OTHER EXPENSES
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO 51GNIFiCANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET,
—35—
S
S
S
ENVIRONMENT
a
;
PROJECT TITLE:
MIDDLE STREET DRAINAGE SYSTEM ;
LOCATION:
MIDDLE STREET ;
PURPOSE:
TO ALLEVIATE FLOODING AT THE INDEPENDENCE AND MIDDLE STREET INTERSECTION. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
CONSTRUCT RELIEF STORM DRAINAGE DITCH AND DETENTION BASIN WITH ;
NECESSARY STORM SEWER LINES ;
a
�
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
FLOODING OF THE INTERSECTION OF INDEPENDENCE AND MIDDLE STREET AND THE ;
IMMEDIATE JOINING PROPERTIES HAS BEEN OCCURRING FREQUENTLY AND AT AN ;
INCREASING RATE, ;
f
FINANCING:
,
;200,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SALES TAX (H) ;
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE ;
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
iNCREASE OTHER EXPENSES
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO 51GNIFiCANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET,
—35—
S
S
S
,
ENVIRONMENT ;
PROJECT TITLE:
RED STAR DRAINAGE SYSTEM ;
LOCATION:
ALONG RAND AND WATER STREETS AND EAST TO THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER. ;
PURPOSE:
TO REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF STORMWATER FLOODING. ;
P6YSICAL DESCRIPTION:
ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS, CLEARING AND CLEANING OF BRUSH AND DEBRIS FROM THE ;
CHANNEL AND REPLACEMENT OF STREET CROSS—DRAINS. ;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ;
,iUSTIFiCATION:
FLASH FLOODING CURRENTLY CREATES SERIOUS HAZARDS TO PROPERTY ;
AND PERSONAL SAFETY IN THIS AREA. ;
FINANCING:
$324,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SALES TAX (H) '
,
,
,
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ;
INCREASE REVENUE
$
DECREASE REVENUE
;
NET REVENUE
IMPACT ;
SALARY COSTS
;
OTHER EXPENSE
;
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT $ '
NET iMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET $ ;
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET. ;
f
,
s
—36—
I IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-37-
ENVIRONMENT ;
t
PROJECT TITLE:
RTE. K TRUNK SEWER EXTENSION
LOCATION:
RTE. K/1-55 INTERCHANGE AREA ;
PURPOSE:
TO EXTEND TRUNK SEWER ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
INSTALLATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1765 FEET OF SANITARY SEWER TRUNK EXTENSION ;
ALONG WITH NECESSARY MANHOLES AND APPURTENANCES FROM BUDGET INN LAGOON,
NORTHERLY TO POINT JUST NORTH OF MISSOURI ROUTE K.
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
TO EXTEND CITY SEWER SERVICES THROUGHOUT AREA CURRENTLY WITHIN CITY
LIMITS AND AREAS DESIRABLE FOR FUTURE GROWTH
rFINANCING:
S01,200 PFA BONDS (C)
I IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-37-
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
—38—
ENVIRONMENT
;
PROJECT TITLE:
SAN DANGARO SEWER
LOCATION:
RT. W TO SAN DANGARO SUBDIVISION
1
PURPOSE:
TO EXTEND SEWER SERVICE TO NORTHWEST PART OF CITY
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 2.5 MILES OF SANITARY SEWER FROM RT. W TO
SAN OANGARO SUBDIVISION ;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
dUSTiFICATiON:
TO EXTEND CITY SEWER SERVICES IN NORTHWEST PART OF CITY AND WOULD
ELIMINATE THREE SEWAGE LAGOONS AND TWO PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
;
FINANCING:
$1,443,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
3
,
1
1
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
—38—
Recreation & Leisure
Capq*ltal Improvement Budget
120.000
100.000
80.000
60.000
40.000
20.000
1990-91 1991-92 1932-93 199-1-94 1991-95
-39-
N AN
!
PROPOSED PROJECTS
;PROJECT;
;
; 1990-91
i991-92
; 1992-93
1993-94
; 1994-95
;NUMBFR
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
; TOTAL COST
; FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
; FISCAL YEAR ; FISCAL YEAR
; FISCAL YEAR
;
i
4-i
1
;'
General Park
1
; ; 375.000
1
; ; 75,000
1
; ; 75,000
1
; ; 75,000
t
; ;
75,000
I
; ; 75,000
t
Development
TOTALS
; ; 375,000
; ; 75,000
= 75,000
; ; 75,000
; ;
75,000
; ; 75,000
;
1
1
1
!
1
I
I
I
I
A
; ; 375,000
; ; 75,000
; ; 75,000
; ; 75,000
; ;
75,000
; ; 75,000
C
;
!
t
!
1
1
f
1
t
r
!
1
1
1
F
G
1
I
!
1
1
!
!
I
1
1
i
i
i
1
I
1
I
1
!
t
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
!
!
1
1
!
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
i
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
7
!
f
1
1
Shelters, Playorounos, Parking, Restrooms
—40—
,
r
i
i
RECREATION AND LEISURE
rROjECT TITLE:
GENERAL PARK DEVELOPMENT - SHELTERS, PLAYGROUNDS, PARKING, RESTROOMS
LOCATION:
VARIOUS PARKS ;
;
PURPOSE:
TO REPLACE AND EXPAND FACILITIES WHICH ARE BASIC FOR PUBLIC
USE OF PARK AREAS. ;
,
;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
CONSTRUCT NEW SHELTERS, INSTALL NEW PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT, PAVE ;
PARKING AREAS, AND INSTALL RESTROOMS. ;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
jUSTIFICA.TION:
CITY PARKS HAVE SOME FACILITIES WHICH ARE AGING AND"NEED REPLACEMENT.
THERE ARE ALSO A NUMBER OF VACANT AREAS WHICH NEED TO BE DEVELOPED
TO ACCOMMODATE INCREASING USE BY CITIZENS.
r
,
riNANCING:
$375,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A) ;
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE 5
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT ;
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT g
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET 5
NO SiGNiFiCANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-41-
Community D efv e t op meat
Capital Improvement Budget
390.000
20D.0D0
100,000
1990-91 1991-92 1992--93 1993-94 1994-95
-42-
)WINiTY DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED PROJECTS
;PRO�iECT; 1 1 1990-9i ; i991-92 1 1992-93 1 1993-94 1994-95 ;
;NUMBER iMPROVEMENT ITEM 1 TOTAL COST ; FiSCAL YEAR 1 FISCAL YEAR 1 F15CAL YEAR ; FISCAL YEAR 1 FISCAL YEAR ;
, !
5-i ; Puolic Works/ ; F 1001000 1 $ 100,000 '
1 ParKs Maintenance ;
1 Facility
5-2 Municipal Court 1 $ 162,000 1 $ 162,000
1 1 Relocation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
r
1 TOTALS 1 ; 262,000 1 i 262,000 '
r 1 1 1 1 1
,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
A
1 C 1; 162,000 1 S 162,000 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 E
F
G
i 1
,
—43—
;
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE:
PUBLIC WORKS/STORAGE FACILITY
;
LOCATION:
TO BE DETERMINED
,
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE EXPANDED STORAGE FACILITIES FOR MATERIALS
PnYSiCAL DESCRIPTION:
OPEN SPACE FOR GENERAL MATERIALS STORAGE AND CONSTRUCTION
OF A SALT STORAGE BUILDING
UNIT OF WORK:
ACQUIRE PROPERTY, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCT
i jUSTiFiCATION:
CENTRALIZED AREA IS NEEDED TO STORE SALT AND OTHER MATERIALS WHICH ARE
CURRENTLY LOCATED ON PARKS AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION SITES.
FiNANC;NG:
,
$100,000 OTHER (1)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNiFiCANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
—44—
S
5
$
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE iMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT_
LVET lhPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
9
-45-
i
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE:
MUNICIPAL COURT RELOCATION
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
PURPOSE:
TO RELOCATE MUNICIPAL COURT OFFICE FROM POLICE STATION, CONSTRUCT COURT HEARING/
CITY COUNCIL ROOM, AND CONVERT OLD COUNCIL ROOM TO OFFICE AND CONFERENCE ROOMS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
CONSTRUCT OFFICES AND COURT ROOM.
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
,
jUST)FICATION:
MUNICIPAL COURT NEEDS COURT SPACE AND OFFICE SPACE TOGETHER, SEPARATE FROM
POLICE STATION, PER RECOMMENDATION OF STATE AUDITOR. CITY COUNCIL ROOM IS
OFTEN OVERCROWDED WITH STANDING ROOM ONLY.
t
FINANCING:
$i62,000 PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY (C)
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE iMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT_
LVET lhPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
9
-45-
i