HomeMy WebLinkAboutCIP1988-1993CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS
PROGRAM
ADOPTED
FISCAL 1988-1993
THE UNI
EAL
CITY OF
CAPE GIRARDEAU
MISSOURI
BILL NO. 88-55
RESOLUTION NO. 3111�5
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL 1988 - 1993
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Article VI, Section 6.04 of the Charter of the
City of Cape Girardeau requires a Capital Improvement Program;
and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has presented a proposed Capital
Improvement Program to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, proper notice has been published concerning the
availability for inspection of the proposed Capital Improvement
Program and the time and place for a public hearing on the
Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing on the
proposed Capital Improvement Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts the five-year
Capital Improvement Program for fiscal 1988-1993, copies of
which are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk is instructed to attach an
executed copy of this resolution to a copy of the Capital
Improvement Program for fiscal 1988-1993 and to retain such
copy with the permanent records of the City.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS,5��DAY OF , 1988.
Francis E. Rhodes, Mayor
ATTEST:
;I
`e -cletk
ITEM PAGES
Introduction:
City Manager's Letter I
Revenue Sources II
Summaries:
Revenue Funding Sources By Fiscal Year Graph
III
Summary of Funding Sources by Fiscal Year 1988-1993
IV
Capital Improvement Budget By Program Area Graph
V
Summary of Funding Sources Graph
VI
Summary of Recommended Capital Improvement Program
VII
Expenditures 1988-1993 by Program Description and
Source of Funds
Capital Improvements Program:
Transportation
1 - 20
Health and Safety
21 - 23
Environment
24 - 29
Recreation and Leisure
30 - 38
Community Development
39 - 44
April 19, 1988
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Cape Girardeau
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Subject: Final Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Year 1988-1993
In accordance with Article VI, Section 6.04 of the City
Charter, a recommended five year capital program was
submitted to the City Council on January 29, 1988. This
five year program plan is for the period July 1, 1988,
through June 30, 1993. On March 21, 1988, in accordance
with the City Charter, the City Council held a public
hearing for the Capital Improvement Program. Following
City Council and public input, the City Council passed, on
March 21, 1988, Resolution No. 325 adopting the Capital
Improvement Program. It should be noted that this final
Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 1988-1993
includes major changes from the original proposed
document.
The 1988-1993 Capital Improvement Program is a planning
document which establishes the priorites for improvements.
During the upcoming years this document will continue to be
the focal point for our community's development and will be
refined and reevaluated in an attempt to provide the most
efficient use of our resources. This is especially true in
light of the updated Comprehensive Development plan being
reviewed by the City and the proposed Strategic Plan
process.
JRF/jad
Respectfully submitted,
1
YJ. Ronald Fischer
City Manager
I
REVENUE SOURCES
A.
General Fund Revenues
E.
Motor Fuel Tax Receipts
B.
Revenue Bonds
F.
Federal Grants
C.
Public Facilities Authority
G.
Special Assessments
D.
State Grants
H.
Other
II
Re erutp- Fundiag
Sources by Fiscal lrecvr
Capital Improvement Budget
7,5.OR,40D
MOM- OD
�1
4,5,7C40'JD
�.
3y OflD, 0'JD
D
19w-55 '1889-9�7
1��❑-91 191-9� 1882-93
III
SUMMARY OF FUNDING SOURCES BY FISCAL YEAR 1988-1993
SOURCE OF FUNDS ; 1988-89 ; 1989-90 ; 1990-91 ; 1991-92 1 1992-93 ; TOTAL ;
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
; ; 167,000 ;
; 250,000 ;
; 272,400 ;
; 15,000 ;
; 15,000 ;
; 719,400 ;
REVENUE BONDS
;
; 500,000 ;
;
; 500,000 ;
PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY
; ;1,154,000 ;
;
;
;
;
; 1,154,000 ;
; STATE GRANTS
; ;1,400,000 ;
; 800,000 1
; 200,000 ;
; 100,000 ;
;
; 2,500,000 ;
MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPT
; ; 735,450 ;
; 468,110 ;
; 339,140 ;
; 273,820 ;
; 307,590 ;
$ 2,124,110 ;
FEDERAL GRANTS
1 ; 659,398 ;
;1,096,980 ;
s 156,600 ;
;1,500,000 ;
; 472,770 ;
; 3,885,748 ;
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
; ;2,342,732 1
;1,370,522 ;
; 371,140 ;
; 401,180 ;
;
; 4,485,574 ;
OTHER
; ; 44,000 1
; 10,000 ;
;
; 20,000 ;
; 300,000 ;
; 374,000 ;
1
TOTALS
; ;6,502,580 ;
;3,995,612 ;
;1,339,280 ;
;2,810,000 ;
;1,095,360 ;
;15,742,832 ;
+
Is7
Capital linprove.m.ent Budget
By Progrwriz Area,
H E ;LTH
AND SAFETY 5%
Tf"ti 111 "1 JI
'41 Iv1'1
427r.
coMMUNrTy
DD/ELOPMENT Bio
4ECR E'ATI Ota!
ted D LO SURE 4%
Swnmaxy of Fundirng Sources
STATE
MOTO R FUELG R.* S 103%.
TAY, F EG EI PTS 13% ��� _-� ! a � / x
FEDERAL
GRANTS5o
PUBLIC FAC
.ALTHOF,FP( 7%
REvENUE
BDNDS
GENERAL
FUND RDIENUES S%
SPECIAL
.STH ER ASS ES SM EM S 28T,;
VI
1 RECREATION
1
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
1$ 275,0001
1 1
1 1 1 1 $374,000 1$ 649,0001
1 LEISURE
EXPENDITURES
1988-1993 BY
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
AND
SOURCE OF FUNDS
;
GENERAL
1$ 237,0001
PUBLIC ;
$1,000,000 1 1 1 1 1$ 1,237,0001
;MOTOR FUEL!
1 1
;
PROGRAM
FUND ;
REVENUE 1
FACILITIES!
STATE
TAX
FEDERAL ;
SPECIAL
DESCRIPTION 1
REVENUES
BONDS 1
AUTHORITY!
GRANTS
1 RECEIPTS
GRANTS 1
ASSESSMENT 1 OTHER
1 TOTAL 1
1 TRANSPORTATION 1
$ 207,4001
1
1
1$2,124,1101
$2,385,7481
$1,905,474 1
1 $ 6,622,7321
HEALTH
1 AND 1
;
1$
400,0001
1 1
1
1
1$ 400,0001
' SAFETY
,
1 ENVIRONMENT 1
$ 500,000 1
$ 754,0001
$1,500,000
1 1
$1,500,0001
$2,580,100 1
1 $ 6,834,1001
1 RECREATION
1
1
1 f 1 1 1 1
1 AND
1$ 275,0001
1 1
1 1 1 1 $374,000 1$ 649,0001
1 LEISURE
1
1 1
1 1 1 1 1
' COMMUNITY
1$ 237,0001
1 ;
$1,000,000 1 1 1 1 1$ 1,237,0001
DEVELPMENT
1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 TOTALS
; $ 719,4001 $
500,000 1 $1,154,0001
$2,500,000 42,124,1101 $3,885,7481 $4,485,574 1 $374,000 1 $15,742,8321
VII
Z 50OL OOD
%00DQom
1, 500, COD
1.000000
50D, OOD
Tran-spo7-tatt on
Capital Ir-eprovement Budget
1958-54 1289-90 1990-91 is -91-92 1992-53
-1-
TRANSPORTATION
-2-
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
;PROJECT;
;
1
1988-89
;
1989-90
1990-91
1 1991-92
1992-93 ;
!NUMBER
IMPROVEM NT ITEM
' TOTAL
T
' FISCAL
YEAR
'
FISCAL
YEAR
' FISCAL
YEAR
' FISCAL YEAR
' FISCAL YEAR
!
!
!
I
1
1
1
I 1
1-1
1
State Route K
; ;
80,030
1 ;
80,030
!
!
!
1
1
1
1
! I
1-2
;
independence
#
812,530
1 ;
812,530
1
Street
Hopper Road
1-3
;
Bridge and
; #
630,360;
;
630,360 !
; ;
Extension to
Mount Auburn
'
!
'
1
r
!
I
1 1
1 I
1-4
1
Sprigg Street
; ;
502,640
1
;
502,640
Phase III
1-5
;-Bloomfield
Road -
1 #
25,750
1
1
;
25,750
1
Kingshighway
1
to 1-55
!
' 1-6
1
Street Overlay
I
1 ;
750,000
1
;
150,000
I
;
150,000
1
#
150,000
1
1 # 150,000
I I
1 ; 150,000 ;
1
1
I
1
1
I
t I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
1 !
Right Turn Lanes
1-7
at Perryville
; ;
78,280
;
; ;
78,280
Road and Cape
1
Rock Drive
;
1-6
Silver Springs
; ;
644,322
1
;
;
644,322
1
Road
1
1 1-9
I
1
South Sprigg
1
; ;
271,920
I
; ;
271,920
!
I
1
I 1
Elevation
;
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
!
I
1
1
1
1 I
! 1
1 1-10
1
Airport Terminal
1 ;
200,000
1 ;
50,000
#
75,000
; $
75,000
;
Building
1
I
I
I
I
1
1
! 1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
i I
1 1-11
1
Airport -
1#
400,000
1
1#
400,000
1
1
FOO Apron
I
1
I
I
I
1
1
1 1
1-12
1
Land Acquisition
1;
100,600
1
1
;
100,000
1
1 1
1
Runways 20, 02,
1
and 10
I
I
1
I
1
1
1
1 1
1 1-13
1
Reconstruction
;;
46,000
1
#
46,000
1
1
Access Road
1-14
1
Reconstruction
1#
26,000
1;
28,000
1
;
T Hanger Taxiways
1
1
1
1
1
-2-
TRANSPORTATION
;
PROPOSED PROJECTS
;PROJECT; ; 1988-89 1 1989-90 ; 1990-91 1 1991-92 ; 1992-93 ;
NUMBER 1 IMPROVEMENT ITEM ; TOTAL COST ; FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR ; FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR ;
1-15Bloomfield Bridge ; $ 480,000 ; 480,000
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1-16 1 Clark Avenue ; $ 186,900 ; $ 42,000 ; $ 144,900
I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
1-17 ; Lexington Street ; $ 1,386,000 ; $ 176,000 $ 203,000 ; $ 482,000 ; $ 525,000
1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1
TOTALS ; $ 6,622,732 ; $1,582,480 ; $2,145,612 ; $1,439,280 ; ; 675,000 ; # 780,360
A ; $ 207,400 ; ; 115,000 ; $ 92,400
I 1 B 1 I 1 I 1 1 1
1 i C
1 I 1 t 1 1 t 1 1
1 I D
E ; $ 2,124,110 $ 735,450 ; $ 348,110 $ 459,140 $ 273,820 ; $ 307,590
F ; $ 2,385,748 ; $ 659,398 ; $ 736,980 ; $ 516,600 ; ; $ 472,770 ;
G ; $ 1,905,474 $ 187,632 ; $ 945,522 $ 371,140 $ 401,180 ;
—3—
-4-
;
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE:
STATE ROUTE K LIGHTING
;
LOCATION:
STATE ROUTE K
;
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR LIGHTING OF STATE ROUTE K BETWEEN
KINGSHIGHWAY AND
INTERSTATE 55.
,
;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
APPROXIMATELY FORTY 1,000 WATT LUMINAIRES AT 30'
MOUNTING HEIGHT
ON STEEL POSTS.
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
j
,
JUSTIFICATION:
TO IMPROVE VISIBILITY FOR THE INCREASED SAFETY
OF THE TRAVELING
PUBLIC.
;
FINANCING:
$80,030 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
1
'
1
I
,
,
I
1
1
1
'
1
1
1
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
'
iNCREASE REVENUE
$
;
+
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
+
SALARY COSTS
!
INCREASE OTHER EXPENSE
6.000.00
;
I
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
# 6,000.00 +
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
; - 6,000.00
I
+
1
�
1
,
{
,
1
1
'
'
7
1
+
I
'
1
1
'
1
I
'
1
I
'
I
'
1
1
'
1
7
1
+
-4-
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
S
-5-
#
i
TRANSPORTATION ;
,
PROJECT TITLE:
INDEPENDENCE STREET
LOCATION:
INDEPENDENCE STREET ;
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF INDEPENDENCE STREET FROM KINGSHIGHWAY
(STATE ROUTE 61) TO EAST RODNEY STREET. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
2,394 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT WITH CURB VARYING
IN WIDTH FROM 44 FEET TO 58 FEET. ;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:
TRAFFIC VOLUME AND CONGESTION HAVE REDUCED THE SERVICE LEVEL. THIS PROJECT '
WILL INCREASE THE SERVICE LEVEL AND EXTEND THE ARTERIAL NATURE OF ;
INDEPENDENCE STREET PER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ;
FiNANCING:
# 51,500 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E) ;
#609,398 FEDERAL GRANTS (F) ;
#145,632 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
S
-5-
#
i
—6—
TRANSPORTATION
1
PROJECT TITLE:
HOPPER ROAD BRIDGE AND EXTENSION TO MOUNT AUBURN
1
,
LOCATION:
HOPPER ROAD
;
;
1
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BRIDGE ON HOPPER ROAD EAST OF
MOUNT AUBURN ;
ROAD AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF HOPPER ROAD FROM JUST WEST OF THE
HAWTHORNE
SCHOOL PROPERTY TO MOUNT AUBURN ROAD.
;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
110 LINEAR FOOT BRIDGE OVER CAPE LACROIX CREEK WITH A MINIMUM OF
TWO LANES. ;
i,100 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT WITH CURBS, 36
FEET WIDE. ;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
;
;
I
JUSTIFICATION:
BRIDGE IS FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE, TOO NARROW FOR EXISTING TRAFFIC
VOLUME AND ;
NO ROOM FOR PEDESTRIAN USE. EXTEND EXISTING HIGH TYPE PAVEMENT ON HOPPER ;
ROAD TO HANDLE INCREASED TRAFFIC AND TO MATCH BRIDGE REPLACEMENT.
1
,
FINANCING:
$157,590 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
;
$471,770 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
i
,
1
I
1
,
,
1
1
;
1
1
i
1
1
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
/
;
i7
INCREASE REVENUE
;<
i
,
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE
IMPACT S
1
,
SALARY COSTS
;
OTHER EXPENSE
;
,
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT $
;
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET s
;
1
I
1
,
,
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET.
;
i
1
1
1
,
i
1
i
,
;
1
—6—
7
i
TRANSPORTATION ;
PROJECT TITLE:
SPRIGG STREET PHASE III
LOCATION:
SPRIGG STREET
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE CAPE LA CROIX BRIDGE AT SOUTH
SPRIGG STREET. ;
! PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
APPROXIMATELY 110 LINEAR FOOT TWO-LANE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES.
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY
1
,
JUSTIFICATION:
BRIDGE IS FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE, NEARING STRUCTURAL OBSOLESCENCE. IT ;
SERVES SEVERAL MAJOR INDUSTRIES AND WILL SERVE THE WASTE TRANSFER ;
SITE FOR THE CITY. ;
1
f
FINANCING:
$125,660 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$376,980 FEDERAL GRANTS (F) ;
1
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-7-
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE S
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET iMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-8-
TRANSPORTATION ;
PROJECT TITLE:
BLOOMFIELD ROAD - KINGSHIGHWAY TO I-55 ;
LOCATION:
BLOOMFIELD ROAD ;
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR THE INITIAL PLANNING AND PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING IN CONJUNCTION ;
WITH THE UPGRADING OF BLOOMFIELD ROAD BETWEEN KINGSHIGHWAY AND INTERSTATE 55. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
PROVIDE PLANS. ;
UNiT OF WORK:
PLANNING AND PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ;
jUSTIFiCATION:
THIS IS A DEVELOPING AREA. PLANNING NEEDS TO BE DONE ANTICIPATING ;
INCREASED TRAFFIC VOLUMES. ;
FINANCING:
$25,750 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E) ;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE S
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET iMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-8-
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE: STREET OVERLAY
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
PURPOSE: PROVIDES FOR CONTINUING MAJOR STREET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FOR
THE OVERLAY OF 7 MILES OF LOCAL AND COLLECTOR ASPHALT STREETS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: MILLING OR OTHER SURFACE PROFILING METHOD AND ASPHALT OVERLAY.
UNIT OF WORK: CONSTRUCT
dUSTiFICATION: COST EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE TO PREVENT NEED FOR FUTURE RECONSTRUCTION
OF ENTIRE PAVEMENT.
FINANCING: $750,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX (E)
iNCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
$
$
THIS KIND OF PROGRAMMED MAINTENANCE SHOULD SAVE ABOUT $7 FOR EVERY $1 SPENT
IN FUTURE RECONSTRUCTION COSTS.
—9—
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE ;
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-10-
i
S
1
TRANSPORTATION
+
,
,
PRO,iECT TITLE:
RIGHT TURN LANES AT PERRYVILLE ROAD AND
CAPE ROCK DRIVE ,
LOCATION:
PERRYVILLE ROAD AND CAPE ROCK DRIVE
,
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF 4 RIGHT
TURN LANES AT THE ;
INTERSECTION OF PERRYVILLE ROAD AND CAPE
ROCK DRIVE. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
960 SQUARE YARDS OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT
PAVEMENT. ,
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:
INCREASE SERVICE LEVEL OF INTERSECTION TO
HANDLE HIGHER VOLUMES
OF TRAFFIC.
;
FINANCING:
$78,280 MOTOR FUEL TAX (E)
;
,
+
+
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE ;
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-10-
i
S
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-11-
TRANSPORTATION ;
PROJECT TITLE:
SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
LOCATION:
SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR THE CONTINUED DEVELOMENT OF SILVER SPRINGS ROAD AS A COLLECTOR ;
STREET. CONSTRUCTION NORTH FROM ROUTE K TO THE COMPLETED SECTION SOUTH OF ;
INDEPENDENCE AND FROM INDEPENDENCE TO WISTERIA. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
3,650 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT 40 FEET WIDE WITH CURBS.
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
TO EXTEND PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY TRAFFIC FLOW.
FINANCING:
$644,322 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
+
,
+
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-11-
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH SPRlGG ELEVATION ,
+
+
LOCATION: SOUTH SPRIGG STREET ;
PURPOSE: PROVIDES FOR ELEVATING THE ROADWAY OUT OF THE FLOODPLAIN TO ALLOW ACCESS
TO THE LONE STAR PLANT, CITY TRANSFER STATION, AND OTHER SITES IN THE AREA ;
DURING PERIOD OF FLOODING ALONG THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER.
PIiYSlCAL DESCRIPTION: 12 FEET ftll MATERIAL AND 5,800 LINEAR FEET OF 22 FOOT WIDE PAVEMENT. ,
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTiFiCATION: TO HAVE YEAR-ROUND ACCESS TO MAJOR INDUSTRIES AND WASTE
TRANSFER SITE.
FINANCING: #211,920 MOTOR FUEL TAX (E)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE #
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE !MPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-12-
#
#
,
TRANSPORTATION '
!
!
PROJECT TITLE:
AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING
LOCATION:
CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW TERMINAL BUILDING OR RENOVATION
OF THE EXISTING BUILDING.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
RENOVATION AND X-RAY BAGGAGE EQUIPMENT
!
!
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
!
JUSTIFICATION:
TERMINAL BUILDING APPEARANCE 15 DETERIORATING WITH AGE.
LUGGAGE MUST CURRENTLY BE SEARCHED BY HAND.
FINANCING:
$150,000 GENERAL FUNDS (A) ;
$ 50,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F) ;
,
,
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
!
NET REVENUE iMPACT $ ,
SALARY COSTS '
!
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET 3
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
,
,
-13-
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-14-
S
i
t
TRANSPORTATION
;
;
PROJECT TITLE:
AIRPORT - FBO APRON ;
LOCATION:
CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ,
PURPOSE:
PROVIDES FOR AN OVERLAY OF THE APRON AREA IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE '
FOO AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE DRAINAGE. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
ASPHALT OR CONCRETE OVERLAY.
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ;
;
juSTIFiCATION:
MAINTAIN LEVEL OF QUALITY. ;
FINANCING:
$40,000 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
$360,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F) ;
;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-14-
S
i
t
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
—15—
TRANSPORTATION ;
;
PROJECT TiTLE:
LAND ACQUISITION - RUNWAYS 20, 02, AND 10 ;
LOCATION:
CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ;
PURPOSE:
ACQUISITION OF LAND AT END OF RUNWAYS 20, 02, AND 10 WILL MEET THE OBJECTIVE ;
OF SAFE CLEAR ZONES AND PREPARATION OF FUTURE EXPANSION. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
LAND ;
;
UNIT OF WORK:
ACQUISITION ;
;
dUSTiFICATION:
AIRPORT SAFETY AND DEVELOPMENT ;
;
FiNANCiNG:
$10,000 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A) ;
$90,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F) ;
;
;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
—15—
TRANSPORTATION
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-16-
PROJECT TITLE:
RECONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROAD ;
LOCATION:
CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE:
ENHANCE AIRPORT TRAFFIC BY RESURFACING THE ACCESS ROAD FROM THE
HIGHWAY SERVICE ROAD TO THE TERMINAL BUILDING.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
ASPHALT OVERLAY.
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
MAINTENANCE OF FACILITY. ;
FiNANCING:
$4,600 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
$41,400 FEDERAL GRANTS (F) ;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-16-
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT TITLE: RECONSTRUCTION T HANGER TAXIWAYS
LOCATION: CAPE GIRARDEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PURPOSE: PROVIDE ADEQUATE STRENGTH AND CORRECT PROFILE AND DRAININAGE PROBLEMS.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT.
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: QUALITY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE.
FINANCING: $2,800 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
$25,200 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE t
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-17-
1
_
'
TRANSPORTATION
;
PROJECT TITLE:
BLOOMFIELD BRIDGE
;
LOCATION:
BLOOMFIELD ROAD
,
PURPOSE:
PROVIDE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BRIDGE ON BLOOMFIELD ROAD.
;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
122 LINEAR FOOT TWO-LANE BRIDGE.
,
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT Of WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
,
JUSTIFICATION:
BRIDGE IS FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE FOR TRAFFIC USING IT.
,
FINANCING:
$120,000 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS IE)
i
1360,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE E
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
S
NET iMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-18-
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-19-
TRANSPORTATION '
,
PROJECT TITLE:
CLARK AVENUE
LOCATION:
CLARK AVENUE ;
PURPOSE:
TO CONNECT THE EXISTING NORTH AND SOUTH SECTIONS OF CLARK STREET. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
,
1600' OF CONCRETE PAVEMENT 36' WIDE. ;
i
uNiT Or WORK:
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
ADDITIONAL NORTH -SOUTH CONNECTOR WILL IMPROVE TRAFFIC FLOW !
IN THIS AREA OF THE CITY. ;
FINANCING:
$186,900 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G) ;
,
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT $
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-19-
TRANSPORTATION 1
PROJECT TITLE: LEXINGTON STREET
LOCATION: NORTHFIELD TO ROUTE W 1
PURPOSE: PROVIDE FOR THE CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF LEXINGTON AS AN ARTERIAL STREET ;
RUNNING EAST AND WEST ACROSS THE NORTH PART OF THE CITY.
1
1 1
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 8,550 LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE AND ASPHALT PAVEMENT 44 FEET WIDE ;
WITH CURBS. r
UNIT OF WORK: DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION: PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ORDERLY TRAFFIC FLOW EAST/WEST THROUGH
THE NORTH PART OF THE CITY.
FINANCING: $451,380 MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS (E)
$928,620 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
1
S
-20-
S
S
S
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
#-rJD.0;JD �.
3uQ dOG
nn �
20a OCA❑
t
10.0.00D
D
19-59 1989-9a 19�G-91 1991-37- 1992-9.3
-21-
HEALTH AND SAFETY
PROPOSED PROJECTS
;PROJECT; 1 1988-89 1 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93
:NUMBER 1 IMPROVEMENT ITEM 1 TOTAL COST 1 FISCAL YEAR 1 FISCAL YEAR ' FISCAL YEAR ' FISCAL YEAR ' FISCAL YEAR '
1 2-1 1 Fire Station No. 2; ; 400,000 1; 400,000
1 1 Relocation + I t
1 1
1 TOTALS1 t I 1
; 400,000 1 ; 400,000
I {
1 1
, I
I I I I 1 I I I I
r r r
1 1 1 { 1 I I 1
1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1
1 I 1 I
r r r !
1 i 1 1 I I I 1 1
I , ,
i I I 1
1 { 1 I 1 1 1 t 1
1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1
I I 1 ! I 1 1 1 1
I
1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
+ { 1
1 1 I I 1 I 1
r r ,
1
1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1
I 1 1 1 1
1 1 A
1 B 1; 400,000 1; 400,000 1 1 1 1 1
1 C
1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1
1 I t I I 1 I I I
1 1 E + 1 1 1 I 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 F + { 1 I I 1
1 1 r 1 I I { { 1 I
1 1 u 1 1 I 1 I 1 1
1 I H
1 1 1 I 1 I I I I
+ + 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 I 1
I t I 1 { { 1 I 1
1 I 1 I 1 1 1
1 I 1 1 I t 1 1 {
1 I I 1 I I t 1 I
1 1 1 I 1
—22—
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $ -0-
DECREASE REVENUE -0-
NET REVENUE IMPACT 5 -0-
INCREASE SALARY COSTS 45,000.00
OTHER EXPENSE NONE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $ 45.000.00
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $ - 45,000.00
-23-
I
HEALTH AND SAFETY
I
PROJECT TITLE:
FIRE STATION NO. 2 RELOCATION
I
LOCATION:
TO BE DETERMINED
PURPOSE:
TO UTILIZE MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT OF DEPARTMENT MORE QUICKLY AND EFFICIENTLY.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
1
THREE BAY TRUCK ROOM WITH LIVING QUARTERS FOR MEN, SIMILAR TO ;
STATION NO. 4.
I
I
UNIT OF WORK:
ACQUIRE SITE, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:
THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE CITY HAS RAPIDLY DEVELOPED, BOTH COMMERCIALLY AND ;
RESIDENTIALLY. THE IMPORTANCE OF SHORTER RESPONSE TIME CANNOT BE
EMPHASIZED ENOUGH. GREATER POSSIBILITES OF LOSS OF LIFE AND LARGER FIRE ;
LOSSES ARE A SURETY WITHOUT A STATION IN THIS AREA. POSSIBILITY OF AREA ;
BEING ISOLATED BY FLASH FLOODING ALSO EXISTS.
FiNANCiNG:
$300,000 PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY (C)
DEBT SERVICE PAID THROUGH GENERAL FUND. '
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $ -0-
DECREASE REVENUE -0-
NET REVENUE IMPACT 5 -0-
INCREASE SALARY COSTS 45,000.00
OTHER EXPENSE NONE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $ 45.000.00
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $ - 45,000.00
-23-
E-rzv-LT on -7-neT?,t
Capital lraprovevient Bud-get
4.ODD, ODD
3,OCID,000
Z 00a 0 0 D
1,0000OD
D
IBES-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 132-9.3
-24-
-ENVIRONMENT
'
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
;
;PROJECT;
;
;
1988-89
; 1989-90
;
1990-91 ;
1991-92
; 1992-93 ;
'NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
TOTAL COST
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR '
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
; FISCAL YEAR
1
3-1
1
;
Bloomfield Road
I
; $ 925,000
1
;
1
; $925,000
1
1
I I
Relief Sanitary
'
Sewer - Phase 11
1
3-2
1
;
College and
1
; $2,000,000
1
;
1
;
I
;
1
;
$2,000,000
I 1
Henderson
1
I
Outfall Sewer
1 1
1
1
3-3
I
1
Transfer Station
1
; $ 754,000
1
;
$754,000
1
I
1
1 1
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
I
1
I 1
I I
1
3-4
1
;
Sanitary Sewers
1
; $3,155,100
1
;
$3,155,100
1
I
1
I I
Phase ill
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1 I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1 I
TOTALS
; $6,834,100
;
$3,909,100
; $925,000
;
$2,000,000
;
I
1
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1 I
1 1
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
1 1
I
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
t
I
I
1 I
1 1
1
1
I
1 1
1
t
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I 1
I I
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
I 1
A
8
; $ 500,000
;
;
;
;
$ 500,000
C
1 $ 754,000
;
$ 754,000
D
; $1,500,000
;
$1,000,000
; $500,000
1
E
I
I
I
I
1
1 1
F
; $1,500,000
;
;
$1,500,000
G
; $2,580,100
;
$2,155,100
; $425,000
;
I
1
H
1
1
I
1
1
I 1
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i i
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1 1
I I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I 1
I
1
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
I 1
1 I
I
1
1
1
1
1
I I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 I
+
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
I 1
1 I
I
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
I 1
1 I
1
t
1
1
I
I
1
I 1
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
1 1
1 1
1
;
I
1
I
I
I
I I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i i
-25—
1
ENVIRONMENT
PROJECT TITLE:
BLOOMFIELD ROAD RELIEF SANITARY SEWER - PHASE II ;
1
LOCATION:
BLOOMFIELD ROAD ;
PURPOSE:
TO PROVIDE NECESSARY CAPACITY IN THE BLOOMFIELD ROAD AND I-55 DRAINAGE AREA
FOR DEVELOPMENT ON EAST SIDE OF I-55 ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
A RELIEF SANITARY SEWER LINE AND PUMP STATION UPGRADE. '
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN, ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY, AND CONSTRUCT
aUSTIFiCATION:
EXISTING PUMP STATION AND SEWER LINE IS AT CAPACITY NOW. THIS CONDITION ;
WILL PREVENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA WEST OF SILVER SPRINGS ROAD
AND SOUTH OF ROUTE K. ;
{
1
1
FINANCING:
$500,000 STATE GRANTS (D) ;
$425,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G) ;
i
I
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
{
1
1
1
=
1
'
1
i
;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ;
1
,
INCREASE REVENUE
$
7
!
_ j
DECREASE REVENUE
;
1
NET REVENUE
IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
;
i
1
OTHER EXPENSE
;
;
7
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT =
7
,
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
1
j
1
,
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET.
1
I
I
,
I
1
1
I
,
1
1
1
,
.
,
,
1
1
,
1
1
—26—
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-27-
'
ENVIRONMENT ;
PROJECT TITLE:
COLLEGE AND HENDERSON OUTFALL SEWER ;
LOCATION:
COLLEGE AND HENDERSON STREETS '
PURPOSE:
RECONSTRUCT THIS OUTFALL SANITARY SEWER TO COMPLY WITH DNR REQUIREMENTS. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
3,350 LINEAR FEET OF PAVING AND PIPING TO WHAT IS NOW AN OPEN DITCH. ;
' UNIT OF WORK:
ENGINEER, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
DNR REQUIREMENT FOR HEALTH REASONS. '
FINANCING:
$500,000 REVENUE BONDS (B) ;
$1,500,000 FEDERAL GRANTS (F) ;
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-27-
PROJECT TITLE:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
FINANCING:
ENVIRONMENT !
TRANSFER STATION
SPRIGG STREET
TO DISPOSE OF SOLID WASTE
STATIONARY PACKER TYPE TRANSFER STATION WITH COMPACTION INTO ROLL -OFF CONTAINERS.
CONSTRUCT AND PURCHASE EQUIPMENT
WILL REPLACE CURRENT LANDFILL OPERATION.
4154,000 PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY (C)
' DEBT SERVICE PAID THROUGH TRASH FEES.
iNCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
INCREASE OTHER EXPENSES
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
S
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
286,000
-28-
S
$ 286,000
$ -286,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE S
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-29-
S
S
ENVIRONMENT ;
PROJECT TITLE:
;
SANITARY SEWER PHASE III ;
LOCATION:
PURPOSE:
TO PROVIDE SANITARY SEWER LINES ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
;
UNIT OF WORK:
CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
;
FINANCING:
$2,155,000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (G) ;
$1,000,000 STATE GRANTS (D) ;
,
,
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE S
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-29-
S
S
#{1D, 0IDD
30D, GOG ��
200, ODD
D
1933-E9 1959-90 1990-91 1991-97- 1919.2 - R3
-30-
RECREATION AND LEISURE
,
f PROPOSED PROJECTS
;PROJECT; ; 1988-89 ; 1989-90 ; 1990-91 ; 1991-92 ; 1992-93 ;
;NUMBER ; IMPROVEMENT ITEM ; TOTAL COST ; FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR ; FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR
4-1 ; Park Restrooms ; $ 75,000 ; ; 15,000 ; 15,000 ; ; 15,000 ; ; 15,000 ; 15,000
; 4-2 ; Capana Park lagoon ; ; 50,000 ; 50,000
improvements
I 1 1
1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1
1 1 r r r r r r r
1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I
4-3 ; Parking Facilities ; ; 50,000 ; 30,000 ; 20,000
4-4 ; Softball Complex ; ; 100,000 ; ; 50,000 ; ; 50,000 ;
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- 1 r
, � 1
4-5 Golf Course ; ; 42,000 ; ; 32,000 ; 10,000
fairway Restoration;
and Cart Paths
1 i 1 1 i i i i i
4-6 ; Golf Course ; ; 320,000 ; ; 20,000 ; ; 300,000 ;
Club House/Pro Shop;
I i I 1 1 1 1 I I
1 I I 1 ( 1 1 I
1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1
4-7 ; Golf Course ; ; 12,000 ; I2,000
Storm Shelter/
;- ; Restroom
1 1 I ( I I I 1
1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 1
TOTALS ; ; 649,000 ; ; 139,000 ; ; 95,000 ; ; 65,000 ; ; 35,000 ; ; 315,000
I I 1 1 I 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1
1 I t I 1 1 1 1 1
1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
1 I 1 I I 1 ( I 1
I 1 1 I 1 I
1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 I II I 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t
I 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I
1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I
1 I 1 1 I I 1 t 1
1 { 1 I I 1 I I 1
1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1
A ; $ 275,000 ; ; 95,000 ; ; 85,000 ; 65,000 ; ; 15,000 ; 15,000
a
1 C 1 1 1 1 I 1 1
1 0 I I 1 1 1 1 1
i E 1 I I ( I 1 1
1 , F 1 I t t 1 1
t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
I G
H ; S 374,000 ; ; 44,000 ; S 10,000 ; S 20,000 ; S 300,000
-31-
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE 5
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT S
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-32-
RECREATION AND LEISURE ;
PROJECT TITLE:
PARK RESTROOMS ;
LOCATION:
ALL PARKS ;
PURPOSE:
TO PROVIDE FOR BASIC NEEDS OF PARK PATRONS ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
BASIC RESTROOM FACILITIES, VANDAL RESISTANT AND EASILY MAINTAINABLE.
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT '
JUSTIFICATION:
TO PROVIDE FOR THE BASIC HUMAN NEEDS OF PARK USERS AND TO ELIMINATE ;
THE UNSIGHTLY USE OF PORTABLE TOILETS. ;
FINANCING:
$15,000 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A) ;
,
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE 5
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT S
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-32-
-33-
RECREATION AND LEISURE ;
,
PROJECT TITLE:
CAPAHA PARK LAGOON IMPROVEMENTS ;
LOCATION:
CAPAHA PARK ,
PURPOSE:
TO STOP EROSION, DREDGE LAGOON, IMPROVE APPEARANCE, AND PROVIDE GREATER ;
ACCESS. PROJECT WILL ALSO GREATLY IMPROVE AESTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ;
THIS MUCH ENJOYED AND USED COMMUNITY PARK ATTRACTION. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
DREDGE LAGOON, REPAIR RETAINING WALL, CONSTRUCT WALKWAYS AND FOOTBRIDGES, ;
LANDSCAPING AND PARK AMENITIES. ;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
SEDIMENTATION FROM RUN OFF WATER HAS FILLED THE LAGOON TO THE POINT THAT '
IT HAS BECOME A LARGE SEPTIC LAGOON. THE RECENT ADDITION OF FOUNTAINS HAS ;
IMPROVED WATER QUALITY SOMEWHAT. DREDGING 15 ESSENTIAL FOR LASTING ;
IMPROVEMENTS TO RESULT. THE LAGOON IS ONE OF THE FOCAL POINTS OF THE PARK ;
AND NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED AND HAVE DEVELOPMENT DONE TO ENHANCE THIS GREAT ;
RECREATION RESOURCE. THE LAGOON HAS NOT BEEN DREDGED IN OVER ZO YEARS AND ;
SHOULD BE DONE FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY REASONS AS WELL AS AESTHETICS. ;
FINANCING:
$50,000 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A) '
,
,
,
;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE
$ ;
+
,
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE
IMPACT ;
,
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT $ ;
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $ ;
,
,
+
,
NO SiGNiFiCANT IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET. ;
,
I
+
;
-33-
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE 5
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-34-
i
i
i
RECREATION AND LEISURE
i
PROJECT TITLE:
PARKING FACILITIES ;
LOCATION:
ALL PARKS ;
PURPOSE:
TO PROVIDE PARKING AREAS IN ALL PARKS ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
GRAVEL AND INSTALL BORDERS FOR MORE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT USE OF
PARKING AREAS. ;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
PARKING AREAS ARE BADLY NEEDED IN ALL PARKS FOR THE SAFETY OF THOSE
USING THE PARKS AS WELL AS THE SAFETY AND PRESERVATION OF PARK RESOURCES. ;
FINANCING:
$50,000 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
INCREASE REVENUE 5
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
-34-
i
i
i
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $ 30,000.00
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
iNCREASE SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
-35-
4,000.00
$ 30,000.00
$ 4.000.00
$ + 26,000.00
'
RECREATION AND LEISURE ;
PROJECT TITLE:
SOFTBALL COMPLEX
i
LOCATION:
SHAWNEE PARK ;
PURPOSE:
TO ADD MORE FIELDS TO OUR SYSTEM AND REMOVE THE OVERCROWDING ,
,
OF ARENA PARK. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
TWO LIGHTED SOFTBALL/BASEBALL FIELDS AROUND A CENTRAL CONTROL CENTER/ ,
CONCESSION AREA.
UNIT OF WORK:
ACQUIRE, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
TO INCREASE REVENUE, INCREASE TOURISM TRADE, INCREASE CONTROL OF FIELDS ;
AND QUALITY, AND TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF FIELDS. ;
I
FINANCING:
$100,000 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A) ;
,
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $ 30,000.00
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
iNCREASE SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
-35-
4,000.00
$ 30,000.00
$ 4.000.00
$ + 26,000.00
FINANCING: ;42,000 GOLF COURSE REVENUES (H)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE ; 37,000.00
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
-36-
37,000.00
; + 37,000.00
`
RECREATION AND LEISURE ;
PROJECT TITLE:
FAIRWAY RESTORATION AND CART PATHS
LOCATION:
JAYCEE MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
PURPOSE:
TO ESTABLISH GOOD GOLFING CONDITIONS IN THE FAIRWAYS. TO ATTRACT MORE ;
PLAYERS AND IMPROVE EXISTING PLAYING CONDITIONS. THIS PROJECT WILL GIVE ;
US A MUCH BETTER PLAYING SURFACE AND ALLOW US TO COMPETE WITH NEIGHBORING ;
COURSES. TO IMPROVE PRESENT CART PATHS AND DECREASE WEAR AND TEAR ON GOLF CARTS. ;
PHYSiCAL DESCRIPTION:
DISCING OF PRESENT FAIRWAYS AND PLUGGING OF BERMUDA GRASS SPRIGS. '
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE FOR 4 1/2 MILES OF CART PATHS, B FEET IN WIDTH. ;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:
WITH THE INSTALLATION OF OUR IRRIGATION SYSTEM WE NOW NEED TO MAKE THE '
NECESSARY FAIRWAY IMPROVEMENTS AS OUTLINED IN GOLF ARCHITECT GARY KERN'S ;
OPERATION PLAN TO CONTINUE TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF ROUNDS OF GOLF. ;
CART PATHS ARE NEEDED TO IMPROVE LIFE OF CITY OWNED CARTS AS WELL AS ;
MAKING PLAY MORE ENJOYABLE. PATHS WILL ALSO DECREASE WEAR ON FAIRWAY GRASS. ;
FINANCING: ;42,000 GOLF COURSE REVENUES (H)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE ; 37,000.00
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
-36-
37,000.00
; + 37,000.00
-37-
RECREATION AND LEISURE
;
,
PROJECT TITLE:
CLUB HOUSE/PRO SHOP
;
LOCATION:
JAYCEE MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
;
PURPOSE:
TO PROVIDE A LARGER CONCESSION AREA, LARGER LINE OF
RESALE ITEMS, LOCKERS, ;
RECEPTION AREA AND TO PROVIDE A PLEASANT ATMOSHPERE
FOR GOLF PATRONS. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
40' X 60' FACILITY WITH RESTROOMS, LOCKERS, SHOWERS,
PRO SHOP, ;
CONCESSION AREA, LOUNGE, AND RECEPTION AREA.
;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
;
JUSTIFICATION:
THIS FACILITY WILL GIVE THE COURSE A MORE PROFESSIONAL
ATMOSPHERE AND '
ALLOW US TO BETTER COMPETE WITH AREA COUNTRY CLUB FACILITIES.
;
FINANCING:
$320,000 GOLF COURSE REVENUES (H)
;
,
i
;
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
;
INCREASE REVENUE
$ 10,000.00
;
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE
IMPACT S
101000.00 ;
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT $
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET $
+ 10,000.00
,
,
,
,
,
-37-
i
3
RECREATION AND LEISURE
PROJECT TITLE:
STORM SHELTER/RESTROOM ;
LOCATION:
JAYCEE MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
PURPOSE:
TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FROM INCLEMENT WEATHER AND PROVIDE RESTROOM
FACILITIES ON THE COURSE, AS WELL AS CONCESSIONS. ;
PHYSiCAL DESCRIPTION:
PRE -FAB METAL BUILDING. ;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT ;
JUSTIFICATION:
PRESENTLY PATRONS USE THE BUSHES TO RELIEVE THEMSELVES, AND WE DO NOT ;
PROVIDE REFRESHMENTS ON THE COURSE. ;
FINANCING:
$12,000 GOLF COURSE REVENUES (H) ;
,
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE $ 11000.00
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OThER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
-38-
$ 1,000.00
5
$ + 11000.00
Cornraunily Developmomt
CarAt l Improve-rnent Budget
59D, O:1D
37Ey 00D
25CL ODD
125.000--
D
19�P-5� 1989-90 199❑ -91 1991-92 19929-R3
Intz
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
—40—
PROPOSED
PROJECTS
1
;PROJECT;
1988-89 ;
1989-90 1
1990-91
1
1991-92
1 1992-93 ;
NUMBER 1
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
1 TOTAL COST
1 FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL
YEAR 1
FISCAL
YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR ;
5-1 1
Community
;1,000,000
#
400,000 1
;
300,000 1
;
200,000
1
# 100,000
1
1
Development Block
1
1 1
Grant Projects
1 5-2
Salt Storage Shed
; $ 72,000
; ;
72,000 1
;
1
I 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
I
I
I
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
I
1 1
5-3 1
Municipal Court
; ; 50,000
;
;
50,000 ;
1
1
Relocation
1 1
r
r
1
1 1
1 �
�
I
I
I
I
1 1
5-4
Storm Hater System;
; 115,000
115,000
1
;
Middle Street
TOTALS
#1,237,000
; ;
472,000 1
;
350,000 ;
;
315,000
1
# 100,000
;
i I
I
I
1
I
1
1 1
1 I
i
1
1
1
I
1 1
1
A
1 ; 237,000
; #
72,000 1
;
50,000 1
#
115,000
1
;
1 1
! t
B
I
1
1
1
I
!
1
I
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 I
! 1
C
1
I
{
1
1
1
1
I
{
1
I I
1 1
1
D
; ;1,000,000
1 #
400,000 1
;
300,000 1
#
200,000
1
$ 100,000
1
I i
E
1
1
I
t
1
I I
1 1
1 1
F
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
!
1 1
1 1
I I
1 I
G
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
!
1 1
1 I
1 I
1 1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
t 1
1 I
1
1
1
1
I
!
1
1
I
1
1 1
[ 1
I 1
I 1
1
1
i
1
1
}
1
1
1
t
I t
1 1
1 1
t
1
1
I
i
I I
I 1
1 1
I
t
1
I
1
7
I
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
I
I
I
t
t
1 1
1
1 1
1
I
l
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
I 1
1 I
1 1
!
r
1
r
1
1 I
I
1
1
t
I
1 1
I
1
1
1
1 1
I I
1
I
t
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
{
1 I
1 {
1 t
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
!
1 1
I 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
I
1
t
1
1
I
1
1
I
1 I
1 I
1
1 1
I
t
1
I
t
1
1
1
1
1 1
t 1
1 1
1
t
1
I
1
I 1
1 t
1
I
t
1
1
1 I
1 1
1
I
1
I
I 1
1 I
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
1
t
1
1 1
1 1
t 1
!
I
1
1
t
1 1
1 !
1
1
1
1
{
I
1
1
1
I
{ 1
1 I
1 i
1
1
1
I
1
f
1
r
1 1
t r
—40—
-41-
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ;
,
PROJECT TITLE:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROJECTS ;
LOCATION:
'
PURPOSE:
TO PROVIDE FOR ANNUAL GRANTS TO ASSIST IN NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION AND ;
REHABILITATION OF VARIOUS PUBLIC WORKS AND HOUSING RELATED ITEMS. ;
;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
REHABILITATE HOMES AND REPAIR STREETS ;
UNIT OF WORK:
REHABILITATE, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCT '
jUSTiFICATION:
TO ARREST THE DECLINE OF THE CITY'S NEIGHBORHOODS AND STABLIZE THEM IN ;
ORDER TO OFFER BETTER LIVING CONDITIONS FOR COMMUNITY RESIDENTS. ;
FINANCING:
$1,000,000 STATE GRANTS (D) '
,
,
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ;
INCREASE REVENUE
$ ;
DECREASE REVENUE
'
;
NET REVENUE
IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
;
OTHER EXPENSE
;
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT $ '
,
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING
BUDGET $
,
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET. ;
,
,
,
,
-41-
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ;
PROJECT TITLE: SALT STORAGE SHED
LOCATION: TO BE DETERMINED
PURPOSE
PnYSiCAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
JUSTIFICATION:
FINANCING:
STORE SALT
THE BUILDING 15 61 FT. IN DIAMETER. THIS DOME TYPE OF BUILDING CONSISTS OF
PRE -STRESSED PLYWOOD SKIN PANELS LAMINATED TO FRAMES INSTALLED ON A
REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL THAT IS TREATED WITH A SALT RESISTANT
MIX AND WITH A 4" ASPHALT PAD FOR THE FLOOR.
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE CURRENTLY USED TO STORE SALT AT FOUNTAIN AND
INDEPENDENCE SHOULD BE REMOVED DUE TO THEIR DETERIORATED CONDITION.
=12,000 GENERAL FUND (A)
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
iNCREASE REVENUE
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE IMPACT
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE
NET EXPENSE IMPACT
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
t
—42—
S
S
i
1
1
/
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE:
MUNICIPAL COURT RELOCATION
;
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
'
PURPOSE:
TO REMOVE MUNICIPAL COURT OFFICE FROM
POLICE STATION AND CONSTRUCT ;
COURT HEARING ROOM.
;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
CONSTRUCT OFFICES AND COURT ROOM.
;
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
JUSTIFICATION:
MUNICIPAL COURT NEEDS COURT SPACE AND
OFFICE SPACE TOGETHER, ;
SEPARATE FROM THE POLICE STATION.
;
1
1
1
FINANCING:
$50,000 GENERAL FUND (A)
;
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
;
1
1
1
iNCREASE REVENUE
$
;
DECREASE REVENUE
NET REVENUE
IMPACT
1
SALARY COSTS
;
OTHER EXPENSE
;
1
;
NET EXPENSE
IMPACT
E ;
1
,
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING -BUDGET
1
1
,
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
ON OPERATING BUDGET.
;
1
,
1
'
/
1
,
1
'
1
1
1
1
-
,
,
,
1
1
I
1
1
-43-
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ;
iNCREASE REVENUE $ ;
DECREASE REVENUE ;
NET REVENUE IMPACT S ;
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE ;
r ,
NET EXPENSE IMPACT S ;
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
—44—
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE:
STORM WATER SYSTEM ;
LOCATION:
MIDDLE STREET
PURPOSE:
TO ALLEVIATE FLOODING AT THE INDEPENDENCE AND MIDDLE STREET ;
INTERSECTION. ;
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
UNIT OF WORK:
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT
,
dUSTIFiCATION:
FLOODING OF THE INTERSECTION OF INDEPENDENCE AND MIDDLE STREET AND THE ;
IMMEDIATE JOINING PROPERTIES HAS BEEN OCCURRING FREQUENTLY AND AT AN ;
INCREASING RATE. ;
i
FINANCING:
$115,000 GENERAL FUND REVENUES (A) ;
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET ;
iNCREASE REVENUE $ ;
DECREASE REVENUE ;
NET REVENUE IMPACT S ;
SALARY COSTS
OTHER EXPENSE ;
r ,
NET EXPENSE IMPACT S ;
NET IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET $
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET.
—44—