HomeMy WebLinkAboutCIP1984-1989ffAml%x%6k
THE UNIO
$FAIL
Ow",
1I
ADOPTED
FISCAL 1984-1989
CA A
IMPROVEMENTS
PROGRAM
CAPE GIRARDEAU,
MISSOURI
ADOPTED
FISCAL 1984-1989
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS
PROGRAM
CAPE GIRARDEAU,
MISSOURI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
Manager's Letter i
Revenue Sources ix
Capital Improvements Program
Executive and Administrative Services 1
Transportation 3
Health and Safety -11
Environment 13
Recreation and Leisure Time 17
Community Development 23
Table 1
Summary of Recommended Capital Improvement Program
Expenditures 1984-1989 by Program Description and Source of Funds 25
H1_t 1 _ TT
Summary of Funding Sources by Fiscal Year 1984-1989 26
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members -of the City Council
City of Cape Girardeau
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI
OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER
February 2, 1984
In accordance with Article VI, Section 6.04 of the City
Charter, I am submitting herewith a recommended five
year capital program for the City of Cape Girardeau,
Missouri. This is the second program plan that has
been submitted under this Charter provision. This five
year program plan is for the period initiating July 1,
1984, through June 30, 1989.
The material contained within the budget document
complies with the requirements of the Charter as to
program proposals, cost estimates, methods of financing,
projection of revenue sources to meet costs, recom-
mended time schedule for each improvement and an
estimated impact on the annual operating budget. The
Charter requires that the City Council hold at least
one public hearing on the Capital Improvement Program.
In addition, the Charter prescribes that the City
Council, by resolution, shall adopt a Capital
Improvement Program ninety (90) days prior to the
beginning of the new fiscal year.
There have been a number of citizens within the commun-
ity who have participated in the preparation of this
five year capital plan again this year, City department
i
directors and their staff, the various City advisory
boards and commissions including Park and Recreation,
Golf and Airport, as well as the City Council members
themselves had the opportunity to submit program pro-
gram proposals. The City Council will be able to
discuss the proposals in full, and, most importantly,
set the proper policy direction for the implementation
of our future development program. The City Council
may include additional projects, eliminate some of the
projects, adjust the year for scheduled implementation
or alter the method of financing.
BACKGROUND
The Capital Improvement Program should be considered as
an investment in the future of our community. The deci-
sions that will be made, as they relate to this type of
long range planning, will certainly be a legacy that we.
will.leave to eventually be managed by our children.
This will be a commitment of various forms of resources
with the expectation of realizing future benefits over
a reasonably long period of time. It can truly be said
that if a municipality is to experience growth, its
City government must recognize that the desired growth
can take place only if it is willing to make a series
of investment (capital expenditures) decisions involving
long-lived assets and programs. This -system of capital
expenditure management is important because:
1. The consequences of investments and capital
projects extend far into the future.
2. Decisions to invest are often irreversible.
3. Such decisions significantly influence a
municipality's ability to grow and prosper.
The selection and evaluation of capital projects is a
difficult task that involves some speculation and the
ability to make estimations which, to some extent, are
based on historical perspectives. A capital expenditure
may be defined as one used to construct or purchase a
facility that is expected to provide services over a
considerable period of time. In contrast, a current or
operating expenditure is for an item or service that is
used for a short period of time. Moreover, a capital
expenditure usually is relatively large compared with
items in the annual budget. This is the basic type of
definition that we have used in guiding the preparation
of this capital program budget.
The City of Cape Girardeau, during the 1970's, because
of new revenue sources, some of which were income elas-
tic, was able to meet a number of its capital financing
needs and accomplish improvement programs without the
use of debt financing. Also, during this period of
time, the City was able to reduce or eliminate other
revenue sources. This pay as you go capital budgeting
system allowed for the improvement of many municipal
facilities while saving various debt charges. The pay
as you go system meant that the City government was
allocating a significant portion of operating revenues
each year to the Capital Improvement Fund. The monies
in this fund were used for annual capital improvements
or saved until there were sufficient funds for larger
projects. In any case, a regular capital allocation
would be made from the operating budget to smooth bud-
get allocations for capital expenditures and eliminate
the need for debt financing.
The City was able to adopt and successfully implement
the pay as you go system because of a number of events
ii
that happened early in the 1970's and continued for a
number of years. This included the implementation of
the citywide sales tax in October of 1971 and the
implementation of the Federal General Revenue Sharing
program at approximately the same time. These two
revenue sources, together with the growth in other
income elastic revenues such as the franchise tax and
the motor fuel tax, allowed the City to have revenue
sources that exceeded the cost of inflation during the
early years of the 1970's. In fact, City revenues were
keeping pace with operational expenditures and exceeding
the cost of inflation until approximately early 1977.
At that point, the City's revenue sources began losing
the struggle with the ravages of inflation. During the
next three years, these revenues were unable to keep
pace with the requirements for capital expenditures.
Therefore, there has been a reduction in the available
revenue for long range expenditures, and in fact these
expenditures have been sharply curtailed.
Furthermore, during that period of time, the City
reduced other types of revenues available for expendi-
ture. There was the elimination of the citywide motor
vehicle tax in 1977 which eliminated $90,000 in availa-
ble revenue. In addition, the City continually
decreased the property tax levy. The levy has been
reduced from $1.41 per one hundred dollars of assessed
valuation, which was effective in 1970, to the current
$.72 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation.
These reductions were made in light of the revenues the
City was receiving and based on commitments made with
people in the community as part of the change to new
revenue sources.
The General Revenue Sharing Program, during the early
years since its inception, did allow a substantial
commitment of funding toward capital projects. How-
ever, the City took over the citywide refuse collection
sys_tem in 1974, and chose to provide free refuse col-
lection for residential property owners. The General
Revenue Sharing Program was committed to defray the
cost of that program. In the succeeding years, the
amount of General Revenue Sharing that has been going
to the waste collection and disposal program has sub-
stantially increased to the point that very little
capital expenditure money is available from this source.
The ravages of inflation can also be seen in the
revenue sharing program, which has basically not
increased the amount of money that has been made availa-
ble to the City over the past ten years. This continues
to be the case as the bill extending this program for
another three years provides for no increase in the
amount the City will receive. Therefore, the actual
purchasing power of money has decreased by approximately
fifty percent in that period of time.
In addition, the City has used receipts from the Motor
Fuel Tax Fund for capital improvement projects. These
funds are transmitted to the City as its portion of the
State gasoline tax. However, because of the continuing
increasing costs of maintenance of public streets and
right-of-ways, the City has continually used more of the
money from this fund to provide for ongoing maintenance
rather than capital items. Also, the.revenues from this
tax source have remained stagnant the past few years
because of more fuel efficient cars and the reduced
speed limit.
In looking at the available revenues for long range
capital planning in a historical sense and projecting
that to the future, it would appear that the pay as you
go system of financing will have to be replaced with a
pay as you use method of financing. In its pristine
theoretical form, pay as you use financing means that
every long term improvement is financed by serial debt
issues with maturities arranged so that the retirement
of the debt coincides with the depreciation of the
iii
project. Therefore, when the project finally ends, the
last dollar of debt is paid off. The interest and debt
retirement charges paid by each generation of taxpayers
would coincide with their use of the fiscal assets.
These payments parallel the productivity of the social
investment with each user group paying for its own
capital improvement.
The City Council, in 1983, formally considered and
adopted a long range Capital Improvements Program for
the first time under the current Charter requirement.
This budget document and the process should provide a
more relevant approach to identifying and implementing
important community wide projects.
PROGRAM AND FINANCING DESCRIPTIONS
The major category program areas in which the various
projects have been described included Executive and
Administrative Services, Transportation, Health and
Safety, Environment, Recreation and Leisure Time and
Community Development. These major categories contain
the following types of projects:
1. Executive and Administrative Services. This
category includes activities that serve the forma-
tion of policy through relevant research and
analysis, provide overall direction and coordina-
tion of the City staff and evaluation of the
program methods and accomplishments. It also
includes areas which support the internal or staff
operations of the City organization. This would
include accounting, purchasing and personnel
systems, as well as maintenance of City buildings
and other facilities.
2. Transportation. The activities in this area pro-
vide the maintenance and construction of the
public right of ways within the City. This also
includes Municipal Airport improvements.
3. Health and Safety. This area includes the public
safety services, building standards enforcement and
animal control.
4. Environment.- The perservation, restoration and
care of the physical resources of the City, both
natural and man made, as well as the control of
solid waste disposal, sewerage and storm water
management.
5. Recreation and Leisure Time. The programs under
this area provide an environment for citizens to
enjoy natural areas, an opportunity to participate
in organized and unorganized leisure time activi-
ties. The organized activities include operations
to learn athletic and cultural skills and to parti-
cipate in related events.
6. Community Development. Activities under this area
include specific and general land use planning and
zoning and construction of community and economic
development projects which have citywide effect.
We have included the types of revenue sources which are
recommended as ways to consider for the financing of the
various capital improvements. The following is a brief
discussion of what the various revenue sources include:
A. General Fund Revenues. These revenues would be
included -and available on an annual appropriation
basis from the City's general fund, which includes
the receipt of revenues from many and various
sources.
B. General Obligation Bonds. These bonds can be
issued by the City or various general types of
public improvements. These bonds require the appro-
val by the electorate with an extraordinary two
iv
thirds majority. The City has adequate debt
capacity to accomodate the proposed program.
C. Revenue Bonds. These bonds are issued for the
financing of—self-supporting public improvements.
Revenue bonds are not included within the limita-
tions of indebtedness by the City and are issued
upon the authorization of voter approval. The
bonds are used for enterprise funds such as water,
sewer and electric utility operations.
D. State Grants. The City is eligible to submit grant
applications to the State of Missouri for funds
that they may have available either from their own
revenue sources or, in some cases, from revenue
sources that they administer for various federal
agencies.
E. Motor Fuel Tax Receipts. This fund provides for
the reFe—iptand disbursement of the revenues the
City receives as its portion of the State Gasoline
Tax. The revenues from this source can be used for
capital, as well as annual operating maintenance
expenses as they relate to improvements on the
City's public right-of-way.
F. Federal Grants. The City is eligible to receive
various Fe eral grants on a competitive basis from
the appropriate federal agency. This could include
the Environmental Protection Agency as it relates
to wastewater improvements, the Federal Highway
Administration which administers and distributes
funds from the Federal Gasoline Tax revenue through
the Federal Aid Urban program, or the Federal
Aviation Administration for airport improvements.
G. Revenue Sharing. This is a separate trust fund
that the City maintains which provides for the
receipt and disbursement of General Revenue Shar-
ing Funds. The City may use revenues from this
source for a wide range of capital, as well as
ongoing annual expenditure items.
H. S ecial Assessments. This category provides for
the consideration of special assessments which
are used for public improvements affecting
specific areas. The total or a portion of the
cost of an improvement is divided among property
owners who benefit from the project. This type
of funding can be used for diverse improvements,
including storm water, sanitary sewer or sidewalk
improvement.
I. Other. This category is used for the inclusion of
the potential for new revenue sources or for
adjustments within the program as the City Council
may determine. New revenue sources could include
the expansion of existing revenues in order to
widen the scope of funding to meet required
program needs.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The total proposed Capital Improvement Program is rec-
commended to be $25,118,089. In reviewing the summary
pages at the end of this document, it can be seen that
the first year is substantially more than in succeeding
years primarily because of the inclusion of the multi-
purpose building, which is proposed to be constructed
with Southeast Missouri State University. Recognizing
the fact that there is no available current revenue from
existing sources to provide for capital improvements on
a pay as you go basis, the largest category for funding
these proposed improvements over the next five years is
through general obligation bonds. This provides for
$10•;771,400 in funding over this period of time with, of
course, the largest single item being the multi-purpose
v
building with nearly half of this total. The City may
issue bonds up to 20% of its assessed valuation. The
City has an assessed valuation in excess of $130 million;
therefore, we could issue over $26 million in bonds.
The remaining bonded indebtedness is $275,000. The City,
as it can be seen, has a large bond capacity.
The second largest funding source would include federal
grants ($4,299,773) which could be made available for
various proposed improvements.. These improvements, of
course, cannot be counted on in all cases and are depen-
dent upon the appropriation by the Congress, as well as
the decision by individual federal agencies that admin-
ister the distribution of these funds. The third
largest source of funding of proposed improvements is
through the use of revenue bonds ($3,615,008). These
.improvements are primarily for the sanitary sewer system.
which will provide the capacity that is necessary within
the existing collection system to operate a safe and
sanitary.system today, as well as providing the neces-
sary trunk line extension to deal -with the annual growth
that will be taking place in the community during the
succeeding five years. The next largest revenue source
is state grants ($2,510,000) which is the state admin-
istered community development block grant program.
The executive adminstrative services project category
($226,500) provides primarily for improvements at the
public works center that are in conjunction with the
equipment management facilities report and will provide
for a more cost effective, efficient and secure opera-
tion. The other item provides for the continued
maintenance of the City Hall building, as well as the
anticipated upgrading of existing computer hardware in
the final year of the proposed program.
The transportation program ($9,625,599) contains the
largest amount of proposed expenditure over the next
five year period. This is a common occurrence in
communities because of the tremendous investment that
is made in the various types of roads and road struc-
tures. The program provides for the construction,
reconstruction and improvement of a number of major
arterials, including bridge replacement on these
arterials. There is an emphasis that is necessary in
street overlaying and street sealing in order to pre-
serve and extend the life of various arterial streets
within the community. These include the continuation
of improvement on major arterials such as Lexington
Street, Broadway, North West End Boulevard and William
Street. However, these improvements depend in part on
new revenue sources being made available to the City.
This area also proposed continued improvements at the
City's Municipal Airport which are financed primarily
by the Federal Aviation Administration through the
Federal Aviation Gas Tax. The improvements that are
proposed within this program are those that have been
previously established by the City with the Federal
Aviation Administration.
The Health and Safety project area ($965,350) provides
primarily for improvements in the area of public safety.
Two of the larger items include the planning for a west
side fire station which would replace a current fire
station which is badly located in relationship to other
fire service areas, and the purchase of two major
replacement pieces of fire equipment. In addition, one
of the other items is a proposed expansion of the City's
disaster warning system providing for the implementation
of various pole mounted sirens.
The program area dealing with the environment ($5,423,080)
primarily deals with various sanitary sewer improvements.
These improvements, to be financed with sanitary sewerage
revenue bonds, provide for some minor improvements at the
wastewater treatment plant, a major improvement at the
outfall sewer at College and Henderson Streets, Bloomfield
vi
Road and I-55 and for the major trunk sewers in the area
west of Kingshighway. The area west of Kingshighway is
of particular concern and is being recommended to be
implemented quickly because it will provide relief from
current sewerage flow coming through the west central
area of the community, as well as provide for the abil-
ity for the City to expand and grow in this area. This
program area also provides for the completion of the
City's solid waste disposal site which would be within
the upcoming fiscal year.
The project area of recreation and leisure time
($1,367,560) includes projects which would provide for
the completion of many parks and park areas. This
program is not proposing that new parklands be devel-
oped, but that existing parks and recreation areas be
adequately developed so that they can be used by the
residents of the community. The program specifically
proposed public works improvements in some of the various
parks, as well as the development of. various playfields,
courts, shelters and play areas that can be used for
leisure time activity. The municipal golf course has
been included with some major expenditures in the area
of irrigation and the replacement of the club house.
It is felt that with the inclusion of these items that
play will continue to develop with this facility, leading
it to a self-sustaining financial basis. There is parti-
cular interest being emphasized with the initiation of a
tree development program that could provide for tree
maintenance and planting of trees not only on the public
right of way and in public parks, but also participation
with homeowners throughout the community.
The Community Development project area ($7,510,000)
primarily includes the funding for the construction of
a multi -use building jointly with Southeast Missouri
State University. It is proposed that the majority of
the funding for this structure would be received from
the State of Missouri through designated funds from the
statewide bond issue. Although the General Assembly has
been hesitant about proceeding with this project, it is
hoped that our elected representatives will positively
acknowledge the committment made by the citizens of Cape
Girardeau. In addition, this area provides for the con-
tinued use of the Community Development Block Grant
Program which would provide for rehabilitation of struc-
tures within the community, as well as associated public
works improvements. It also provides for some of the
funded projects to date in this program area, including
the Red Star Neighborhood Restoration project.
Included with this budget document is an estimate of the
impact of the proposed capital improvement program on
the annual operating budget. It should be emphasized
that this is an estimate. However, it has forced us to
analyze this important impact. The total recurring
annual expense, if the entire program were implemented,
would be $148,950. The largest annual expense would be
in recreation and leisure with a cost of $89,750. The
total related capital purchase would be $58,100 with the
largest expenditure in recreation and leisure with
$45,600. However, if the entire capital program were
implemented, there would be certain off -setting cost
savings. The total savings would be $459,200, with the
larest savings in the transportation project category
of t381,925.
ADDITIONAL PROGRAM AREAS
There are numerous capital improvement projects that
have been included within this budget document for City
Council consideration. It is also important to note
some of the items that have not been included in the
proposed program. One of the first areas includes storm
water drainage and related water problems that exist
within the community. The City's policy, as in many
cities, is that storm water drainage is not an effort
vii
that the City becomes directly involved with, other than
through requirements in development plans. These storm
water developments are paid for through a private
developer's resources as they propose developments to
take place within the community. The City does not have,
at this time, a master storm water drainage program plan,
nor does it have available the capital resources which
could be placed into effect in implementing a major
storm water drainage system. The development of a storm
water drainage system and proposed improvements, to a
large extent, depends on the economic realities of
existing and future land use. The City's further consi-
deration of this program project area will depend, in a
large part, on the City Council's policy for this area.
This program contains no proposal that directly relates
with the potential redevelopment efforts in downtown
Cape Girardeau. We have not included various types of
items that could be within a capital improvement program
that would relate to downtown redevelopment because the
proposed development program is only in its preliminary
development stage. It should be anticipated by the City
Council that as a final development plan is put together
for downtown Cape Girardeau, there could be capital
improvement programs related'to public works expenditures
within this area.
As City Council members are aware, we have received and
are in the process of implementing a report dealing with
the City's central maintenance facility and the related
fleet management program. The replacement of motorized
equipment is a reoccuring capital expense, and therefore
appears in the annual operating budget rather than the
long range budget. This City, as with most cities, makes
a major investment in its mobilized fleet equipment. The
fleet equipment of any city makes possible the various
types of ongoing improvement programs and continued
maintenance that are necessary to make the City function
properly. If we are to increase productivity with
existing employees, we must reduce downtime on the
equipment. This can be accomplished with a preventive
maintenance program, a well organized central repair
and maintenance facility and good equipment. We have
made substantial progress in the area of organization
development, procedures, employee training, preventive
maintenance and fiscal and physical controls. However,
in order for the City to provide for vehicles and
equipment that will allow it to maintain and expand
its current horizons in this area, we will have to
invest a substantial amount of money over the next
five years in equipment replacements.
CONCLUSION
The capital improvement program being submitted to the
City Council is, again this year, an ambitious program.
In order to accomplish the goals outlined in this
program, it will require a change in the method of
financing from that existing in the previous thirteen
years. The proposed program of improvements will
require debt financing and increased costs to the
citizens of this community. However, the implementation
of this program will also allow fo the creation of new
job opportunities, an increase in revenues to private
businesses, new businesses growing, existing businesses
expanding, increased tax revenues to all taxing
jurisdictions and the strengthening of the quality of
life in Cape Girardeau and all of Southeast Missouri.
It is hoped that this plan will focus attention on
community goals, needs and capabilities; reduce
scheduling problems and conflicting or overlapping
projects; maintain a sound and stable financial program;
enhance opportunities for participation in federal or
state funded programs; and achieve the highest public
benefit from the expenditure of City revenue.
viii.
It should be remembered that the projects proposed in
this document are the product of many hours of
deliberative thought by a large number of people within
this community. The Charter requires an annual review
and revision of the Capital Improvements Program which
assures that the program remains responsive to changing
demands and priorities in the community. We plan to
review the various projects and funding proposals
contained within this document with City Council members
in various work sessions and the public hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
(• &A-SL,
Gary A. Eide
City Manager
CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, TIISSOURI
OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER
The Honorable Mayor April 20, 1984
and
Members of the City Council
City of Cape Girardeau
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Subject: Final Capital Improvement Program
for Fiscal 1984-1989
In accordance with Article VI, Section 6.04 of the City
Charter, I submitted a recommended five year capital
program to the City Council on February 2, 1984. This
five year program plan is for the period July 1, 1984,.
through June 30, 1989. On March 21, 1984, in accordance
with the City Charter, the City Council held a public
hearing for the Capital Improvement Program. Following
City Council and public input, the City Council.passed,
on March 21, 1984, a Resolution adopting the Capital
Improvement Program.
It should be noted that this final Capital Improvement
Program for fiscal years 1984-1989 includes a few
changes from the original proposed document submitted
to the Council on February 2, 1984. Specifically, the
final Capital Improvement Program includes the following
changes:
1. Proposed expenditures for Project No. 2-4, Sprigg
Street Phase III, were forwarded from fiscal year
1985-86 to fiscal year 1984-85.
2. Proposed expenditures for Project No. 2-10,
Lombardo Drive, were broken down to include $22,500
from special assessments and $22,500 from other
funding, and was forwarded from fiscal year 1985-86
to fiscal year 1984-85.
3. Project No. 2-12, street sealing, omitted
$150,000 for fiscal year 1984-85.
4. Proposed expenditures for Project No. 2-14,
Broadway improvement, were moved up one year and
include $495,000 in general obligation bonds both
in fiscal year 1985-86 and fiscal year 1986-87.
These changes in source of funds, funding levels and
appropriate fiscal years are summarized in Table I
and Table II of this final document. Because of
these changes, the total for the five year Capital
Improvement Program has been reduced from $25,118,089
to $24,968,089.
The 1984-89 Capital Improvement Program is a planning
document which establishes the priorities for
improvements. Various City Boards and Commissions
were involved in the preparation of this document,
and in addition, this document was reviewed by the
Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on
February 8, 1984. Considerable discussion was held
by the Commission, and they have recommended that
sanitary sewers and streets be given the highest
priority and that the Multi -Purpose Building continue
to also receive a high priority. During the upcoming
years this document will continue to be a focal point
for our community and will be refined and reevaluated
in an attempt to provide the most efficient and
effective use of our resources.
R spectfully SSsubmitted,
Gary A. E de
City Manager
A. General Fund Revenues
B. General Obligation Bonds
C. Revenue Bonds
D. State Grants
E. Motor Fuel Tax Receipts
REVENUE SOURCES
ix
F. Federal Grants
G. Federal Revenue Sharing
H. Special Assessments
I. Other
FISCAL 1984-1989
EXECUTIVE
AND
ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES
PROJECT
NUMBER IMPROVEMENT ITEM
EXECUTIVE AND
ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
STAFF ESTIMATES
UNIT OF WORK TOTAL COST FINANCING
This project provides for additional storage facilities, Design,
1-1 Public Works Center wash area improvements, energy conservation and mechanic Installation 128,000
equipment. and
Construction
1-2 City Hall Includes roof repair, tuck pointing and sealing of brick, Installation
carpet replacement and parking lot overlay. and 48,500
Construction
This program calls for the upgrading and integration of
1-3 Equipment existing computer hardware. Capabilites will include Installation 50,000
utility billing.
TOTAL EXECUTIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
1
226,500
128,000 A
48,500 A 1
50,000 A
226,500 A
CAPITAL BUDGET
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
FISCAL YEAR
1985-86
FISCAL YEAR
1986-87 1987-88
FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR
1988-89
FISCAL YEAR
RECURRING ANNUAL
EXPENSE (000's)
RELATED CAPITAL
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ') $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
68,000 A
25,000 A
20,000 A 15,000 A
MAINTENANCE $ 2.5
TOTAL $ 2.5
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 6,500
16,000 A
3,000 A
17,500 A 12,000 A
STAFF ( ) $
MAINTENANCE $ •3
TOTAL $ .3
EQUIPMENT $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $1,000
STAFF ( } $
EQUIPMENT $
50,000 A
MAINTENANCE $6.5
TOTAL $6.5
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $14,100
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
84,000 A
78,000 A
37,500 A 27,000 A
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
FISCAL 1984-1989
TRANSPORTATION
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
TRANSPORTATION
Independence Street
This project provides for the replacement of the current
Right of Way
2-1
bridge on Independence Street
g P just west of Kingshighway
Acquisition
444,400
111,100 E
Bridge
(State Route 61).
and
333,300 F
Construction
This project provides for the reconstruction of
85,000 E
2-2
Independence Street
Independence Street from Kin shi hwa
g g y (State ,Route 61)
Design and
340,000
200,000 F
to.East Rodney Street.
Construction
55,000 H
This provides for the reconstruction of a portion of
Right of Way
2-3
Sprigg Street Phase II
South Sprigg from the end of the Phase I project north
Acquisition
327,332
245,500 F
to the Cape La Croix bridge.
and Const-
81,832 H
ruction
Design, right
2-4
Sprigg Street Phase II
This provides for the replacement of the Cape La Croix
of Way Acqui
456000
114,000 E
bridge at South Sprigg Street.
sition and
,
342,000 F
Construction
Design, right
2-5
Hopper Road Bridge
The project includes the replacement of the bridge on
of Way Acqui
422,267
105,567 E
Hopper Road east of Mt. Auburn Road.
sition and
316,700 F
Construction
Independence Street
Design, Right
This project provides for the widening and reconstruction
of way Acqui-
84,000 E
Intersection
of the Independence Street and Kingshighway intersection.
sition and
252,000 F
Construction
-3-
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
.CAPITAL BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ') $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ ,2
EQUIPMENT $ ,1
111,100 E
333,300 F
MAINTENANCE $ .2
TOTAL $ ,4
OTHER $ ,1
TOTAL $ ,2
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $425
85,000 E
200,000 F
55,000 H
STAFF ( ) $ .9
MAINTENANCE $ .6
TOTAL $ 1.5
EQUIPMENT $ ,4
OTHER $ ,3
TOTAL $ ,7
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
-STAFF ( ) Y 1.3
EQUIPMENT $ .6
MAINTENANCE $ •9
OTHER $ .4
245,500 F
TOTAL $ 2.2
TOTAL $ 1.0
81,832 H
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $3,500
STAFF ( ) $ .1
EQUIPMENT $ .1
114,000 E
342,000 F
MAINTENANCE $ •1
TOTAL $ •2
OTHER $ .1
TOTAL $ .2
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ •1
EQUIPMENT $ .1
105,567 E
MAINTENANCE $ •1
OTHER $
316,700 F
TOTAL $ .2
TOTAL $ .1
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
84,000 E
252,000 F
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
STAFF ESTIMATES
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
2-7
Hopper Road
This project provides for reconstruction of Hopper Road
from just west of the Hawthorne School property to
Mt. Auburn Road.
Design, Right
of Way Acqui
sition and
150,000
37,500 E
112,500 F
Construction
2-8
Lexington Street
This project provides for the continued development of
Lexington as a collector street running east and west
across the north part of the City.
Design, Right
of Wa
Way Acqui-
sition and
Construction
1,695,000
1,300,000 B
345,000 H
50,000 I
2-9
Belleridge Pike
This project provides for the final construction of the
remaining 655 feet of a street in Woodland Hills Estates.
Construction
55,000
55,000 I
2-10
Lombardo Drive
This project provides for the reconstruction of 530 feet
of Lombardo Drive.
Construction
45,000
22,500 H
22,500 I
2-11
Street Overlay
This project provides for a continuing major street
overlay program which will extend the useable life
of the streets.
Construction
300,000
60,000 H
240,000 I
2-12
Street Sealing
This is another continuing major street maintenance
program to provide for the sealing of local and
collector asphalt streets.
Construction
600,000
300,000 H
300,000 I
2-13 Sidewalks
This project provides for the repair of existing side-
walks and the potential construction of new sidewalks.
Design and
Construction
250 ,000
125,000 H
125,000 I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
FISCAL YEAR
1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89
FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR
RECURRING ANNUAL RELATED CAPITAL
EXPENSE (000's) PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $ .4.
EQUIPMENT $ .2
37,500 E
MAINTENANCE $ .3
OTHER $ .1
112,500 F
TOTAL $ .7
TOTAL $ .3
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ 4.9
EQUIPMENT $ 2.3
50,000 I
100,000 B
65,000 H
400,000 B
100,000 H
400,000 B
100,000 H
400,000 B
80,000 H
MAINTENANCE $ 3.5
TOTAL $ 8.4
OTHER $ 1.4
TOTAL $ 3.7
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
55,000 I
STAFF ( ) $ .2
MAINTENANCE $ .2
TOTAL $ •4
EQUIPMENT $ •1
OTHER $ •1
TOTAL $ •2
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( .) Y .2
'EQUIPMENT $ .1
22,500 H
22,500 I
MAINTENANCE $ .1
TOTAL $ .3
OTHER $
TOTAL $ .1
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
10,000 H
40,000 I
20,000 H
80,000 I
10,000 H
40,000 I
10,000 H
40,000 I
10,000 H
40,000 I
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $168,000
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
75,000 H
75,000 H
75,000 H
75,000 H
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
75,000 I
75,000 I
75,000 I
75,000 I'
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $210,000
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
25,000 H
25,000 I
25,000 H
25,000 I
25,000 H
25,000 I
25,000 H
25,000 I
25,000 H
25,000 I
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
This project provides for the widening of Broadway from
Design, Right
2-14
Broadway Improvement
West End Boulevard to Kingshighway (State Route 61).
of Way Acqui-
This provides for 4 lanes, utility relocation, street
sition and
990,000
990,000 B
lights and landscaping.
Construction
West End Boulevard
This project provides for the reconstruction of North
2-15
Improvement
West End Boulevard from Rose Street to Bertlin Street
g
Design and
1,000,000
1,000,000 B
with new surface, drainage and curb and gutters.
Construction
Design, Right
2-16
Wilson Road Bridge
This project provides for the replacement of the bridge
of Way Acqui-
on Wilson Road.
sition and
368,000
368,000 B
Construction
2-17
William Street
This project provides for the reconstruction and widening
Design and
Improvement
of William Street from Sprigg•Street to Main Street.
Construction
242,000
242,000 B
Traffic Signal at
This item provides for the installation of a phased
2-18
Mt. Auburn Road and
traffic signal at the intersection of Mt. Auburn Road
Design and
55,000
55,000 I
Independence Street
and Independence Street.
Construction
Traffic Signal at
This project provides for the installation of a nhased
2-19
Perryville Road and
traffic signal at the intersection of Perryville Road
Design and
54,000
54,000 I
Cape Rock Drive
and Cape Rock Drive.
Construction
Traffic Signal at
2-20
Route K and
This project will upgrade the existing temporary signals
Design and
35,600 E
Mt. Auburn Road
and intersection at Route K and Mt. Auburn Road.
Construction
356,000
320,400 F
-7-
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $ 1.9
EQUIPMENT $ .9
MAINTENANCE $ 1.3
OTHER $ .6
495,000 B
495,000 B
TOTAL $ 3.2
TOTAL $ 1.5
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ 1.6
EQUIPMENT $ .7
MAINTENANCE $ 1.1
OTHER $ .4
5003000 B
500,000 B
TOTAL $ 2.7
TOTAL $ 1.1
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ .2
EQUIPMENT $ .1
MAINTENANCE $ .1
OTHER $ .1
368,000 B
TOTAL $ .3
TOTAL $ .2
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ .9
EQUIPMENT $ .4
MAINTENANCE $ .6
OTHER $ .3
242,000 B
TOTAL $ 1.5
TOTAL $ .7
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
55,000 I
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
54,000 I
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
35,600 E
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
320,400 F
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSESTAFF
UNIT OF WORK
ESTIMATES
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
2-21
Airport - Handicap,
Overlay & Updated ALP
Provide handicapped facilities in terminal, install 8"
windcone on Runway 28, strengthen overlay of South 2-20
and update ALP.
Design and
Construction
125,600
19,724 A
105,876 F
2-22
Safety Extension
Runway 10
Elimination of drainage problem would enhance safety of
larger aircraft.
g (This is currently not a safety problem
to small aircraft.)
Design and
Construction
316000
,
32,000 A
284,000 F
2-23
Parallel Taxiway
Runway 10
.
Last remaining parallel taxiway to Runway 10 has not
been completed. The objective is to make air traffic
on -and along Runway*10 as safe as possible.
Design and
Construction
345,000
35,000 A
310,000 F
2-24
Land Acquisition
Runway 20 Clear Zone
Acquisition of 4 acres between highway right-of-way and
presently owned clear zone. Objective is to Drotect
j
integrity of clear zone and insure safe access.
Acquisition
25,000
2,500 A
22,500 F
2-25
Reconstruction
Taxiway F
Objective is to strengthen Taxiway F and correct
profile and drainage
g problems.
Design and
Construction
153,000
15,000 A
138,000 F
2-26
Reconstruction
T Hanger Taxiways
Objective is to provide adequate strength and correct
profile and drainage problems.
Design and
Construction
25,000
2,500 A
22,500 F
106,724 A
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION9,475,599
3,900,000 B
572,767 E
3,005,276 F
989,332 H
901,500 I
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
RECURRING
ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL
YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES
(000's)
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
$
19,724
A
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
105,876
F
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
$
32,000
A
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
284,000
F
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF (/O
$ 1.2
EQUIPMENT
$
35,000
310,000
A
F
MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
$ •5
$ 1.7
OTHER
TOTAL
$
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
$
2,500
22,500
A
F
MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
$
$
OTHER
TOTAL
$
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
$
15,000
138,000
A
F
MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
$
$
OTHER
TOTAL
$
$ -
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
$
2,500
A
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
22,500
F
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
89,224
111,100
1,301,176
139,332
137,500
A
E
F
H
I
963,000
85,000
200,000
240,000
289,000
B
E
F
H
I
895,000
189,567
729,200
210,000
195.000
B
E
F
H
I
900,000 B
187,100 E
774,900 F
210,000 H
14G,000 I
1,142,000 B
190,000 11
140,000 I
STAFF ( )
MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
$
$
$
EQUIPMENT
OTHER
TOTAL
$
$
$
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
FISCAL 1984-1989
HEALTH
AND
SAFETY
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
STAFF ESTIMATES
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
HEALTH AND SAFETY
3-1
Disaster Warning
System
Implement a city wide warning system consisting of
various pole mounted sirens.
Design and
Construction
262,500
262,500 B
3_2
West Side
Fire Station
Provides for the relocation of the current Fire
Station'#2 to the west part of the city.
Site Acqui-
sition,
Design and
Construction
227,850
227,850 B
3-3
Platform Aerial
Fire Truck
This piece of equipment would replace a 33 year old
fire vehicle and substantially upgrade the equipment
capability of the department.*
Acquisition
355,000
355,000 B
3-4
1250 GPM
Fire Pumper
This piece of equipment would replace a 1967
fire pumper.
Acquisition
120,000
120,000 B
TOTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY
965,350
965,350 B
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF (1;,) $ 2.4
EQUIPMENT $
262,500 B
MAINTENANCE $ 1.5
TOTAL $ 3.9
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $ •5
227,850 B
MAINTENANCE $ 5.4
TOTAL $ 5.4
OTHER $
. TOTAL $ •5
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 6,000
STAFF ( ) $ EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $ .8 OTHER $
355,000 B
TOTAL $ .8 TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 11,900
STAFF ( ) $ EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $ OTHER $
120,000 B
TOTAL $ TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 1,500
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
490,350 B
355,000 B
10,000 B
MAINTENANCE $
$
OTHER $TOTAL
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
FISCAL 1984-1989
ENVIRONMENT
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
ENV IRCNIIENT
4-1
Sanitary Sewer
Trunk Line
This project "
p j provides for the completion of an 18
Construction
260,000
260,000 C
Kingshighway to Themis
sanitary sewer relief line.
Sanitary Sewer
Trunk Line
This project "
p � provides for a 27 sanitary sewer line
Design and
4-2
Commercial Street to
which will provide the necessary capacity in the
Construction
1,511,000
1,511,000 C
intermediate Cape LaCroix drainage area.
Hawthorne Pump Station
Sanitary Sewer Trunk
Line Hawthorne Pump
This project provides for 27" 24" "
p j p , and 10 sanitary
Design and
1,000,000 C
4-3
sewer line to serve various portions of the upper Cape
Construction
1,288,000
288,000 H
Station to North and
North West
LaCroix drainage area.
Waste Water
Sand blast and paint the top and sides of the Trickling
4-4
Treatment Plant
Filter System and replace links and bolts on the primary
Reconstruction
65,000
65,000 C
Improvements
purifier to
p prevent deterioration from rust and to comply
with federal regulations to maintain system.
This project provides for a relief sanitary sewer line
4-5
Bloomfield Road
and pump station which will provide the necessary
Design and
800,000
650,000 C
Relief Sanitary Sewer
capacity in the Bloomfield Road and I-55 drainage
Construction
150,000 H
area.
4-6
College and Henderson
Reconstruct this outfall sanitary sewer in order to
Engineering
Design and
1,299,080
129,008 C
Outfall Sewer
comply with DNR requirments.
Construction
1,170,072 F
1 'A
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ .6
EQUIPMENT $
260,000 C
MAINTENANCE $ .1
OTHER $
TOTAL $ .7
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ 2.9
EQUIPMENT $ .8
1,511,000 C
MAINTENANCE $ .6
OTHER $ .8
TOTAL $ 3.5
TOTAL $ 1.6
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ 6.6
EQUIPMENT $ .2
1,000,000 C
MAINTENANCE $ 1.4
OTHER $ .2
288,000 H
TOTAL $ 8.0
TOTAL $ .4
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
65,000 C
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ 2.1
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $ .4
OTHER $
650,000 C
TOTAL $ 2.5
TOTAL $
150,000 H
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ 1.2
EQUIPMENT $
129,008 C
MAINTENANCE $ •2
OTHER $
1,170,072 P
TOTAL $ 1.4
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
STAFF ESTIMATES
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
4-7
Landfill
Opening a new landfill site and closing the existing site
in accordance with DNR requirements, This new site
will include an outdoor firing range.
Engineering
Design and
Construction
200,000
200,000 G
TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
5,423,080
3,615,008 C
1,170,072
200,000 G
438,000 H
-15-
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ') $
EQUIPMENT $
200,000 G
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
1,836,000 C
1,650,000 C
129,008 C
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
200,000 G
438,000 H
1,170,072 F
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
FISCAL 1984-1989
RECREATION
AND
LEISURE TIME
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
RECREATION AND
LEISURE TIME
5-1
Ballfields
Provides for the construction of ballfields with grass
Construction
5,000
5,000 G
areas and backstops in Cherokee and Shawnee Parks.
5-2
Tree Development
Five year program of tree maintenance and planting,
Implementatio
44,000
44,000 G
Program
development of nursery program and hiring of a forester.
Provides for the installation of a major piece of
5-3
Park Play Areas
sculptured play equipment in one park per year. The
Installation
•75,000
75,000 G
configuration in each park will be unique in itself.
5-4
Ball Courts
Provides for the construction of courts for basketball and,16,800
construction
33,600
F
other court games in Cherokee, Groves and Shawnee Parks.
16,800 G
This item provides for the construction of 6 lighted,
Design and
78'750
39,375 F
5-5
Tennis Courts
high grade tennis courts. Four located in Cherokee Park
Construction
39,375 G
and two in Shawnee Park.
5-6
Park Shelters
This item will provide for additional park shelters
Design and
8,400
4,200 A
in Cherokee and Shawnee Parks.
Construction
4,200 1
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
RECURRING
ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL
YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES
(000's)
STAFF ( ')
$
EQUIPMENT
$
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( k)
$ 2.4
EQUIPMENT
$
.2
5,000 G
MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
$ •5
$ 2.9
OTHER
TOTAL
$
$
.2
OFFSETTING
COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF (12)
$ 19.8
EQUIPMENT
$
40.0
MAINTENANCE
$ 2.0
OTHER
$
7,000 G
8,000
G
9,000
G
10,000 G
10,000 G
TOTAL
$ 21.8
TOTAL
$
40.0
OFFSETTING
COST SAVINGS: $ 6,600
STAFF ( )
Y
EQUIPMENT
$
MAINTENANCE
$ •5
OTHER
$
15,000 G
15,000
G
15,000
G
15,000 G
15,000 G
TOTAL
$ •5
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF (14 )
$ 2.4
EQUIPMENT
$
.2
.16,800
F
MAINTENANCE
$ .5
OTHER
$
16,800
G
TOTAL
$ 2.9
TOTAL
$
.2
OFFSETTING
COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF (')
$ 2.4
EQUIPMENT
39,375
F
MAINTENANCE
$ .5
OTHER
39,375
G
TOTAL
$ 2.9
TOTAL
OFFSETTING
COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF (1/0
$ 1.2
EQUIPMENT
J$25
2,100
2,100
A
1
2,100 A
2,100 1
MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
$ .2
$ 1.4
OTHER
TOTAL
OFFSETTING
COST SAVINGS: $
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
5-7
Dennis Scivally Park
This project provides for the construction of a restroom
Design and
6,510
6,510 A
Restroom
facility to serve this park area.
Construction
This provides for the potential development of a
5-8
Small Neighborhood Park
prototype small neighborhood park. It could consist
Acquisition,
Design and
21,000
21,000 B
of one or two lots in size and use as a combination
Construction
passive or active play area.
Construction of a passive park area, with a spectator
43,250 B
5-9
Riverfront Development
amphitheater along the riverfront within the downtown
Construction
136,500
68,250 E
area. Project would include 10 photo murals and
25,000 I
additional development.
Reconstruction and periodic maintenance of this
5-10
Capaha Park Lagoon
storm water retention area. Provide greater access
Design and
147,000
147,000 B
Improvement
with a paved walkway, retard further erosion and
Construction
improve general aesthetics.
This.project will allow for the major expansion
5-11Recreation
Arena Park
of the recreation program with the building of an
Design and
315,000
315,000 B
Building
80' by 120 ' structure for a multiplicity of year
Construction
round recreational uses.
Municipal Golf Course
This project includes complete irrigation piping,
Design and
5-12
installation of fairway sprinkler heads and automation
57,000
57,000 I
Water System
of entire irrigation system.
Construction
This project in conjunction with the automated irrigation
5-13
Fairway Zoysia
system includes fairway improvement by plug planting
Installation
60,000
60,000 I
Grass Program
21.5 acres of Zoysia.
CAPITAL BUDGET
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (00O's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF () $ 4.8
EQUIPMENT $ .2
MAINTENANCE $ .5
OTHER $
6,510 A
TOTAL $ 5.3
TOTAL $ .2
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 750
STAFF () $ 4.8
EQUIPMENT $
21,000 B
MAINTENANCE $ 1.0
TOTAL $ 5.8
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
43,250 B
68,250 F
25,000 7
STAFF ( ) $ 9.6
MAINTENANCE $ 2.0
TOTAL $ 11.6
EQUIPMENT $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 2,000
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $ •5
OTHER $
147,000-B
TOTAL $ .5
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 3,000
STAFF ( ) $ 9.6
EQUIPMENT $ 2.0
MAINTENANCE $ 7.8
OTHER $
315,000 B
TOTAL $ 17.4
TOTAL $ 2.0
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 2,000
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
57,000 I
MAINTENANCE $ •5
TOTAL $ .5
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 10,050
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
60,000 I
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 9,500
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND 'PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
STAFF ESTIMATES
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
5-14
Municipal Golf Course
This project includes the purchase of 33.4 acres of
land south of the Golf Course. Project would facilitate
future club house.
Acquisition
175,000
175,000 B
Land Acquisition
5-15
Municipal Golf Course
Provides for the dredging of existing lake and #10 Fair-
way construction, with new lake at #1 Fairway.
Design and
Construction
11,000
11,000 B
Lake Improvement
5-16
Municipal Golf Course
New club house and cart storage combination building,
parking lot, furniture and equipment.
Design and
Construction
177,000
177,000 B
Club House
5-17
Municipal Golf Course
Addition to existing building to be used for
equipment maintenance and storage.
Design and
Construction
•16,800
16,800 B
Storage Building
TOTAL RECREATION AND LEISURE ACTIVITIES
1,367,560
10,710 A
906,050 B
124,425 F
180,175 G
146,200 I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( Q $ 2.4
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $ .75
OTHER $
175,000 B
TOTAL $ 3.15
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
11,000 B
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 1,500
STAFF ( 1) $ 9.8
EQUIPMENT $ .75
177,000 B
MAINTENANCE $ 3.0
TOTAL $ 12.8
OTHER $ 2.0
. TOTAL $ 2.75
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) r
MAINTENANCE $ .3
EQUIPMENT $
OTHER $
16,800.B
TOTAL $ .3
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $ 875
27,000 G
117,000 I
6,510 A
186,000 B
16,800 F
39,800 G
2,100 A
241,250 B
107 ,625 F
63,375 G
27,100 I
2,100 A
478,800 B
25,000 G
2,100 I
25,000 G
STAFF ( ) $
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
EQUIPMENT $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
FISCAL 1984-1989
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
-
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
To construct a multi-use building jointly with Southeast
Missouri State University. It is anticipated that approx-
6-1
Multi-Use Building
imately $8,000,000 will be provided by the State of
Design and
5,000,000
5,000,000 B
Missouri through designated funds from the state wide
Construction
capital-improvement bond issue.
6-2
Red Star
Neighborhood
This project provides for housing rehabilitation
ehabilitation,
and street reconstruction.
esi'gn and
510,000
510,000 D
Restoration Project
onstruction
Community Development
Provides for annual grants to assist in the reconstruction
lehabilitation,
6-3
and rehabilitation of various public works and structural
esign and
2,000,000
2,000,000 D
Block Grant Projects
related items.
onstruction
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
-
7,510,000
5,000,000 B
2,510,000 D
-23-
CAPITAL tMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL BUDGET
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
5,000,000 B
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
510,000 D
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
500,000 D.
500,000 D
500,000-D
500,000 D
TOTAL $
TOTAL $ .
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
5,000,000 B
510,000 D
500,000 D
500,000 D
500,000 D
500,000 D
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
-
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
FISCAL 1984-1989
TABLES
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Table I EXPENDITURES 1984-1989 BY PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND SOURCE OF FUNDS
I.% I % /�% in% tr% Irl (rl (141 (1) .
-25-
GENERAL
GENERAL
SPECIAL
FUND
OBLIGATION
REVENUE
STATE
MOTOR FUEL
FEDERAL
REVENUE
ASSESSMENT (H)
TOTAL
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
REVENUES
BONDS
BONDS
GRANTS
TAX RECEIPTS
GRANTS
SHARING
OTHER (1)
EXECUTIVE AND
226,500
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
226,500
TRANSPORTATION
106,724
3,900,00
572,767
3,005,276
989,332 (H)901,500 (I)
9,475,599
HEALTH AND SAFETY
965,350
965,350
ENVIRONMENT
3,615,008
1,170,072
200,000
438,000 (H)
5,423,080
RECREATION AND
10,710
906,050
124,425
180,175
146,200 (I)
1,367,560
LEISURE TIME
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
5,000,000
2,510,000
7,510,000
TOTAL
343,934
10,771,400
3,615,008
2,510,000
572,767•
4,299,773
380,175 1,427,332 (H) 24,968,089
1,047,700 (I)
-25-
Table II
SUMMARY OF FUNDING SOURCES BY FISCAL YEAR 1984-89
SOURCE OF FUNDS
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
173,224'
84,510
57,100
29,100
343,934
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
5,000,000
1,639,350
1,491,250
1,498,80(1
1,142,000
10,771,400
REVENUE BONDS
1,836,000
1,650,000
129,008
3,615,008
STATE GRANTS
510,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
2,510,000
MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS
111,100
85,000
189,567
187,100
572,767
FEDERAL GRANTS
1,301,176
216,800
2,006,897
774,900
4,299,773
REVENUE SHARING
227,000
39,800
63,375
25,000
25,000
380,175
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT-
AND
OTHER
139,332
254,500
678,000
289,000
210,000
222,100
210,000
142,100
190,000
140,000
1,427,332
1,047,70q
TOTAL
9,552,332
5,182,460
4,869,297
3,367,000
1,997,000
24,968,089
-26-