HomeMy WebLinkAboutCIP1983-1988THE UNI
* �oDvvv
$BAIL
ADOPTED
FISCAL 1983-1988
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS
PROGRAM
CAPE GIRARDEAU,
MISSOURI
ADOPTED
FISCAL 1983-1988
CAPITAL
I MPROVEMFNTS
PROGRAM
CAPE GIRARDEAU,
MISSOURI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM
PAGE
Manager's Letter i
Revenue Sources ix
Capital Improvements Program
Executive and Administrative Services 1
Transportation 3
Health and Safety 11
Environment 13
Recreation and Leisure Time 17
Community Development 23
Table I
Summary of Recommended Capital Improvement Program
Expenditures 1983-1988 By Program Description and Source of Funds 25
Table II
Summary of Funding Sources By Fiscal Year 1983-88 26
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Cape Girardeau
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
INTRODUCTION
CITY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI
OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER
January 31, 1983
In accordance with Article VI, Section 6.04 of the
City Charter, I am submitting herewith a recommended
five year capital program for the City of Cape
Girardeau, Missouri. This five year program plan is
for the period initiating July 1, 1983, through June
30, 1988.
The material contained within the budget document
complies with the requirements of the Charter as to
program proposals, cost estimates, methods of financ-
ing, projection of revenue sources to .meet costs and
recommended time schedule for each improvement. The
Charter requires that the City Council hold at least
one public hearing on the Capital Improvement Pro-
gram. In addition., the Charter prescribes that the
City Council, by resolution, shall adopt a Capital
Improvement Program ninety (90) days prior to the
beginning of the new fiscal year.
It should be pointed out that there have been a num-
ber of citizens within the community who have
i
participated in the preparation of this five year
capital plan, including the City department direc-
tors and their staff, the various City advisory
boards and commissions including Park and Recreation,
Golf and Airport, as well as the City Council members
themselves. I have not tried to limit the number or
extent of items that have been included in this pro-
gram, but rather, have tried to include most all
items as recommended by the various individuals and
groups so that City Council members would be able to
discuss the proposals in full and, most importantly,
set the proper policy direction for the implementa-
tion of our future development program. The City
Council may include additional projects, eliminate
some of the projects, adjust the year for scheduled
implementation or alter the method of financing.
BACKGROUND
The Capital Improvement Program should be considered
as an investment in the future of our community.
The decisions that will be made, as they relate to
this type of"long range planning, will certainly be
a legacy that we will leave to eventually be managed
by our children. This* will be a commitment of
various forms of resources with the expectation of
realizing future benefits over a reasonably long
period of time. It can truly be said that if a
municipality is to experience growth, its City
government must recognize that the desired growth
can take place only if it is willing to make a
series of investment (capital expenditures) deci-
sions involving long-lived assets and programs.
This system of capital expenditure management is
important because:
1. The consequences of investments and
capital projects extend far into the
future.
2. Decisions to invest are often irreversible.
3. Such decisions significantly influence a
municipality's ability to grow and prosper.
The selection and evaluation of capital projects is
a difficult task that involves some speculation and
the ability to make estimations which, to some
extent, are based on historical perspectives. A
capital expenditure may be defined as one used to
construct or purchase a facility that is expected to
provide services over a considerable period of time.
In contrast, a current or operating expenditure is
for an item or service that is used for a short per-
iod of time. Moreover, a capital expenditure
usually is relatively large compared with items in
the annual budget. This is the basic type of defi-
nition that we have used in guiding the preparation
of this Capital Program budget.
The City of Cape Girardeau, during the 1970's,
because of new revenue sources, some of which were
income elastic, was able to meet a number of its
capital financing needs and accomplish improvement
programs without the use of debt financing. Also,
during this period of time the City was able to
reduce or eliminate other revenue sources. This pay
as you go capital budgeting system allowed for the
improvement of many municipal facilities while sav-
ing various interest charges. The -pay as you go
ii
system meant that the City government was allocating
a significant portion of operating revenues each year
to the Capital Improvement Fund. The monies in this
fund were used for annual Capital Improvements or
saved until there were sufficient funds for larger
projects. In any case, a regular capital allocation
would be made from'the operating budget to smooth
budget allocations for capital expenditures and
eliminate the need for bond financing. Because the
City saved the interest charges that would have been
incurred on the bonded debt, the absolute amount of
payments for any given capital program were less over
time than if financing were carried out through the
flotation of bonds.
The City was able to adopt and successfully implement
the pay as you go system because of a number of
events that happened early in the 1970's and contin-
ued for a number of years. This included the
implementation of the citywide sales tax in October
of 1971 and the implementation of tb.e Federal General
Revenue Sharing program at approximately the same
time. These two revenue sources, together with the
growth in other income elastic revenues such as the
franchise tax and the motor fuel tax, allowed the
City to have revenue sources that exceeded the cost
of inflation during the early years of the 1970's.
In fact, City revenues were keeping pace with opera-
tional expenditures and exceeding the cost of
inflation untilapproximately early 1977. At that
point, the City's revenue sources began losing the
struggle with the ravages of inflation. During the
next three years, these revenues were unable to keep
pace with the requirements for capital expenditures.
Therefore, there has been a downturn in the availa-
ble revenue for long range expenditures, and in fact
these expenditures have been curtailed.
In addition, during that period of time, the City
reduced other types of revenues available for
expenditure. There was the elimination of the city-
wide motor vehicle tax in 1977 which eliminated
$90,000 in available revenue. In addition, the City
continually decreased the property tax levy. The
levy has been reduced from $1.41 per one hundred
dollars of assessed valuation, which was effective
in 1970, to the current $.72 per one hundred dollars
of assessed valuation. These reductions were made
in light of the revenues the City was receiving and
based on commitments made with people in the commu-
nity as part of the change to new revenue sources.
The General Revenue Sharing Program, during the
early years of its inception, did allow a substan-
tial commitment of funding toward capital projects.
However, the City took over the citywide refuse
collection system in 1974, and chose to provide free
refuse collection for residential property owners.
The General Revenue Sharing Program was committed to
defray the cost of that program. In the succeeding
years, the amount of General Revenue Sharing that
has been going to the waste collection and disposal
program has substantially increased to the point
that very little capital expenditure money is
available from revenue sharing. In addition, the
revenue sharing program will expire on September 30,
1983, unless the Congress decides to extend the pro-
gram. The ravages of inflation can also be seen in
the revenue sharing program, which has basically not
increased the amount of money that has been made
available to the City over the past ten years.
Therefore, the actual purchasing power of money has
decreased by approximately fifty percent in that
period of time. In addition, the City has used
receipts from the Motor Fuel Tax Fund for Capital
Improvement projects. These funds are transmitted
to the City as its portion of the State gasoline
tax. However, because of the continuing increasing
costs of maintenance of public streets and right-of-
ways, the City has continually used more of the
money from this fund to provide for ongoing mainten-
iii
ance rather than capital items. Also, the revenues
from this tax source have remained stagnant the past
few years because of more fuel efficient cars and the
reduced speed limit.
In looking at the available revenues for long range
capital planning in a historical sense and project-
ing that to the future, it would appear that the
pay as you go system of financing will have to be
replaced with a pay as you use method of financing.
In its pristine theoretical form, pay as you use
financing means that every long run improvement is
financed by serial debt issues with maturities
arranged so that the retirement of the debt coincides
with the depreciation of the project. Therefore,
when the project finally ends, the last dollar of
debt is paid off. The interest and debt retirement
charges paid by each generation of taxpayers would
coincide with their use of the fiscal assets.
These payments parallel the productivity of the
social investment with each user group paying for
its own capital improvement. I am including with
this budget document a photocopy of a recent Urban
Data Service report prepared'by the International
City Management Association which discusses in some
detail the recent trends in municipal borrowing.
The City last formally considered a long range
Capital Improvements Program that was prepared and
presented as a part of the updated Comprehensive
Plan of the City submitted in June of 1975. This
plan was prepared in cooperation with the Southeast
Missouri Regional Planning Commission. The City
has maintained a somewhat informal Capital Improve-
ment Program plan since that date, completing
numerous public works and building related improve-
ments within available revenues.
PROGRAM AND FINANCING DESCRIPTIONS
In order to provide additional information to the
City Council members, I will review briefly the
various program and financing descriptions con-
tained within this document. The major category
program areas for which the various projects have
been laid out with the plan include Executive and
Administrative Services, Transportation, Health and
Safety, Environment, Recreation and Leisure Time
and Community Development. These various categories
contain the following types of projects: .
1. Executive and Administrative Services.
This category includes activities that
serve the formation of policy through
relevant research and analysis, provide
overall direction and coordination of the
City staff and evaluation of the program
methods and accomplishments. It also
includes areas which support the internal
operation of the City organization. This
would include accounting, purchasing and
personnel systems, as well as maintenance
of City buildings and other facilities.
2. Transportation. The activities in this.
area provide the maintenance and con-
struction of the public right of ways
within the City. This also includes
Municipal Airport improvements.
3. Health and Safety. This area includes the
Police and Fire Departments, building
standards enforcement and animal control.
4. Environment. The preservation, restora-
tion and care of the fiscal resources of
the City, both natural and man made, as
well as the control of solid waste dispo-
sal, sewerage and storm water management.
iv
5. Recreation and Leisure Time. The programs
under this area provide an environment for
citizens to enjoy natural areas, an oppor-
tunity to participate in organized and
unorganized leisure time activities. The
organized activities include operations to
learn athletic and clutural skills and to
participate in related events.
6. Community Development. Activities under
this area include specific and general
land use planning and zoning and construc-
tion of community and economic development
projects which have citywide effect.
We have included the various types of revenue sources
which are recommended as ways to consider for the
financing of the various public improvements. The
following is a brief discussion of what the various
revenue sources include:
A. General Fund Revenues. These revenues would be
included and available on an annual appropria-
tion basis from the City's general fund, which
includes the receipt of revenues from many and
various sources.
B. General Obligation Bonds. These bonds can be
issued by the City for various general types of
public improvements. These bonds require the
approval by the electorate with an extraordinary
two-thirds majority.
C. Revenue Bonds. These bonds are issued for the
financing of self-suppdrting public improvements.
Revenue bonds are not included within the limita-
tions of indebtedness by City and are issued
upon the authorization of voter approval. The
bonds are used for enterprise funds such as
water, sewer and electric utility operations.
D. State Grants. The City is eligible to submit
grant applications to the State of Missouri for
funds that they may have available either from
their own revenue sources or, in some cases,
from revenue sources that they administer for
various federal agencies.
E. Motor Fuel Tax Receipts. This fund provides for
the receipt and disbursement of the revenues the
City receives as its portion of the State Gaso-
line Tax. The revenues from this source can be
used for capital, as well as annual operating
maintenance expenses as they relate to improve-
ments on the City's public right-of-way.
F. Federal Grants. The City is eligible to receive
various Federal grants on a competitive basis
from the appropriate federal agency. This could
include the Environmental Protection Agency as
it relates to waste water improvements or the
Federal Highway Administration which administers
and distributes funds from the Federal Gasoline
Tax revenue through the Federal Aid Urban
program.
G. Revenue Sharing. This is a separate trust fund
that the City maintains which provides for the
receipt and disbursement of General Revenue
Sharing funds. The City may use revenues from
this source for a wide range of capital, as well
as ongoing annual expenditure items.
I. Special Assessments. This category provides for
the consideration of special assessments which
are used for public improvements affecting
specific areas. The total or a portion of the
cost of an improvement is divided amongst
property owners who benefit from the project.
This type of funding can be used for diverse
improvements, including storm water, sanitary
sewer or sidewalk improvement.
J. Other. This category is used for the inclusion
of the potential for new revenue sources or for
adjustments within the program as the City
Council may determine. New revenue sources
could include the expansion of existing revenues
in order to widen the scope of funding to meet
required program needs..
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The total proposed Capital Improvement Program is
recommended to be $23,433,595. In reviewing the
summary pages at the end of this document, it can be
seen that the expenditures that are proposed on an
annual basis occur on a fairly even basis, with the
exception of the first year. The first year is sub-
stantially more than in succeeding years primarily
because of the inclusion of the multi-purpose
building, which is proposed to be constructed jointly
with Southeast Missouri State University. Recognizing
the fact that there is no available current revenue
from existing sources to provide for capital improve-
ments on a pay as you go basis, the largest category
for funding these proposed improvements over the next
five years is through General Obligation Bonds. This
provides for $10,780,300 in funding over this period
of time with, of course, the largest single item
being the multi-purpose building. The City may issue
bonds up to 20% of its assessed valuation. The City
has an assessed valuation in excess of $130 million;
therefore, we could issue over $26 million in bonds.
The remaining bonded indebtedness is $545,000. The
City, as it can be seen, has a large bond capacity.
The second largest funding source would include
Federal grants ($3,706,458) which could be made
available for various proposed improvements. These
improvements, of course, cannot be counted on in all
cases and are dependent upon the appropriation by
the Congress, as well as the decision by individual
federal agencies that administer the distribution of
these funds. The third largest source of funding
of proposed improvements is through the use of
' revenue bonds ($3,154,000). These improvements are
primarily for the sanitary sewer system which will
provide the capacity that is necessary within the
existing collection system to operate a safe and
sanitary system today, as well as providing the
necessary trunk line extension to deal with the
annual growth that will be taking place in the
community during the succeeding five years.
The administrative services project category pro—
vides primarily for improvements at the public works
center that are in conjunction with -the equipment
management facilities report and will provide for a
more cost effective, efficient and secure operation.
The other item provides for the continued mainten-
ance of the City Hall building, as well as the
anticipated upgrading of existing computer hardware
in the final year of the proposed program.
The transportation program contains the largest
amount of proposed expenditure over the next five
year period. This is a common occurrence in com-
munities because of the tremendous investment that
is made in the various types of roads and road
structures. The program provides for the construc-
tion, reconstruction and improvement of a number of
major arterials, including bridge replacement on
these arterials. There is an emphasis that is
necessary in street overlaying and street sealing
in order to preserve and extend the life of various
arterial streets within the community. These
include the continuation of improvement on major
arterials such as Independence Street, Sprigg Street,
Hopper Road, Lexington Street, Broadway, North West
End Boulevard and William Street. This area also
proposed continued improvements at -the City's Muni-
cipal Airport which are financed primarily by the
Federal Aviation Administration through the Federal
vi
Aviation Gas Tax. The improvements that are pro-
posed within this program are those that have been
previously established by the City with the Federal
Aviation Administration.
The Health and Safety project area provides primarily
for improvements in the area of public safety. Two
of the larger items include the planning for a west
side fire station which would replace a current fire
station which is badly located in relationship to
other fire service areas, and the purchase of a
major piece of fire equipment. In addition, one of
the other items is a proposed expansion of the City's
disaster warning system providing for the implementa-
tion of various pole mounted sirens.
The program area dealing with the environment pri-
marily deals with various sanitary sewer improvements.
These improvements, to be financed with sanitary
sewerage revenue bonds, provide for some minor
improvements at the waste water treatment plant, a
major improvement at the outfall sewer at College and
Henderson Streets and for the major trunk sewers in
the area west of Kingshighway. The area west of
Kingshighway is of particular concern and is being
recommended to be implemented quickly because it will
provide relief from current sewerage.flow coming
through the west central area of the community, as
well as provide for the ability for the City to
expand and grow in this area. This pro�ram area also
provides for the completion of the City s solid waste
disposal site which should be'within the upcoming
fiscal year.
The project area of recreation and leisure time
includes projects which would provide for the com-
pletion of many parks and park areas. This program
is not proposing that new parklands be developed, but
that existing parks and recreation areas be adequately
developed so that they can be used by the residents
of the community. The program specifically proposed
public works improvements in some of the various
parks, as well as the development of various play -
fields, courts, shelters and play areas that can be
used for leisure time activity. The municipal golf
course has been included with some major expendi-
tures in the area of irrigation and the replacement
of the club house. It is felt that with the inclu-
sion of these items that play will continue to
develop with this facility, leading it to a self-
sustaining financial basis. There is particular
interest being emphasised with the initiation of a
tree development program that could provide for tree
maintenance and planting of trees not only on the
public right of way and in public parks, but also in
participation with home owners throughout the
community..
The Community Development project area, on a dollar -
wise basis, primarily includes the funding for the
construction of a multi -use building -jointly with
Southeast Missouri State University. It is proposed
that the majority of the funding for this structure
would be received from the State of Missouri through
designated funds from the statewide bond issue. In
addition, this area provides for the continued use
of the Community Development Block Grant Program
which would provide for rehabilitation of structures
within the community, as well as associated public
works improvements. It also provides for some of
the funded projects to date in this program area,
including the South Cape Neighborhood Restoration
Project and the Florsheim Shoe Company Economic
Development Project.
vii
ADDITIONAL PROGRAM AREAS
There are numerous capital improvement projects that
have been included within this budget document for
City Council consideration. It is also important to
note some of the items that have not been included
in the proposed program for various reasons.. These
could be additional projects included in the capital
improvement program based on City Council discussion.
There are also projected expenditures that are not
normally included in this type of program; however,
they will make a sufficient impact on the financial
resources available to the City for future improve-
ments. One of the first areas includes storm water
drainage and related water problems that exist
within the community. The City's policy, as it is
policy in most cities, is that storm water drainage
is not an effort that the City becomes directly
involved with, other than through requirements in
development plans.. These storm water developments
are paid for through a private developer's resources
as they propose developments to take place within
the community. The City does not have, at this time,
a master storm water drainage program plan, nor does
it have available the capital resources which could
be placed into effect in implementing a major storm -
water drainage system. The development of a storm
water drainage system and proposed improvements, to
•a large extent, depends on the economic realities of
the existing and future land use. The City's fur-
ther consideration of this program project area will
depend, in a large part, on the City Council's
policy for this area.
This program contains no proposal that directly
relates with the potential redevelopment efforts
in downtown Cape Girardeau. We have not included
various types of items that could be within a
capital improvement program that would relate to
downtown redevelopment because the proposed develop-
ment program for this part of the community is only
in its preliminary development stage. It should be
anticipated by the City Council that as a final
development plan is put together for downtown Cape
Girardeau, there could be capital improvement pro-
grams related to public works expenditures within
this area.
As City Council members are aware, we have received
and are in the process of implementing a report
dealing with the City's central maintenance facility
and the related fleet management program. The
replacement of motorized equipment is a reoccuring
capital expense, and therefore appears in. the annual
operating budget rather than the long range budget.
This City, as with most cities, makes a major invest-
ment in its mobilized fleet equipment. The fleet
equipment of any city makes possible the various
types of ongoing improvement programs and continued
maintenance that are necessary to make the City
function properly. If we are to increase produc-
tivity with existing employees, we must reduce
downtime on the equipment. This can be accomplished
with a preventive maintenance program, a well
organized central repair and maintenance facility
and good equipment. As the report indicates, the
City's fleet is in basically poor condition. This
poor condition is not totally attributable to a
central maintenance facility that is incapable of
operating properly. Rather, the City is currently
operating equipment which is old, out of date, worn
out and needs to be replaced. In order for the City
to provide for vehicles and equipment that will
allow it to maintain and expand its current horizons
in this area, we will have to invest $1.1 million
over the next five years in equipment replacements.
This is not new equipment, but rather replacement
equipment, with the largest expenditure coming in
the 1984 year.
viii
CONCLUSION
The capital improvement program being submitted to
the City Council is an ambitious program that, in
order to be accomplished, will require a change in
the method of financing from that existing in the
previous twelve years. The program of improvements
will require debt financing and increased costs to
the citizens of the community. However, the imple-
mentation of this program will also allow for the
creation of new job opportunities, an increase in
revenues to private businesses, new businesses
growing here, increased tax revenues to all taxing
jurisdictions and the strengthening of the quality
of life in Cape Girardeau and all of Southeast
Missouri. It is hoped that this plan will focus
attention on community goal, needs and capabili-
ties; reduce scheduling problems and conflicting or
overlapping projects; maintain a sound and stable
financial program; enhance opportunities for parti-
cipation in Federal or State funded programs; and
achieve the highest public benefit from the expen-
diture of City revenue.
It should be remembered that the projects proposed
in this document were not put together in a frivo-
lous nor ill-timed manner, but rather are the
product of many hours of deliberative thought by a
large number of people within this community. The
Charter requires an annual review and revision of
the Capital Improvements Program which assures that
the program remains responsive to changing demands
and priorities in the community. We plan to
review the various projects and funding proposals
contained within this document with City Council
members in various work sessions and the public
hearing.
espectfully submitted,
Gary Lide
City Manager
A. General Fund Revenues
B. General Obligation Bonds
C. Revenue Bonds
D. State Grants
E. Motor Fuel Tax Receipts
REVENUE SOURCES
ix
F. Federal Grants
G. Federal Revenue Sharing
I. Special Assessments
J. Other
FISCAL 1983-1988
EXECUTIVE
AND
AD.MINISTP!!TIVF
SERVICES
- 1 -
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
EXECUTIVE AND
ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES
Public Works Center
This project provides for additional storage facilities,
wash area improvements, facility securities, centralized
gas dispensing system and paving of outside surface area.
Design and
Construction
143,000
143,000 A
City Hall
Includes carpet and tile replacement, parking lot
sealing, roof repair and maintenance.
Installation
and
Construction
30,600
30,600 A
Equipment
This program replacement provides for the installation
of word processing equipment and upgrading of existing
computer hardware.
Installation
55,000
55,000 A
TOTAL EXECUTIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
228,600
228,600 A
— 2 —
CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL OPFRATING BUDGET IMPACT
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986—R7
1987—R8
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCUASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL. $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S.
STAFF ( ) $
EOUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
20,000 A
78,000 A
25,000 A
20,000 A
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT S
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
9,700 A
1,200 A
18,300 A
1,400 A
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
15,000 A
40,000 A
TOTAL , $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMFNT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHFR $
35,000 A
87,700 A
26,200 A
38,309 A
41,400 A
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS $
FISCAL 1983-1988
TRANSPORTATION
- I -
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
TRANSPORTATION
Independence Street
This project provides for the replacement of the current
Right of way
.
bridge on Independence Street
g p just west of Kingshighway
acquisition
422 000
316,500 F
Bridge
(State Route 61).
and const-
105,500 E
ruction
This project provides for the reconstruction of
Independence Street
Independence Street from Kingshighway (State Route 61)
Design and
290,400
217,800 F
to East Rodney Street.
construction
72,600 E
This provides for the reconstruction of a portion of
Right of way
Sprigg Street Phase II
South Sprigg from the end of the Phase I project north
acquisition
202,000
151,500 F
to the Cape La Croix bridge.
and const-
50,500 I
ruction
Design, right
Sprigg Street Phase III
This provides for the replacement of the Cape La Croix
of way acqui-
400,000
300,000 F
bridge at South Sprigg Street.
sition and
100,000 E
construction
Design, right
Hopper Road Bridge
The project included the replacement of the bridge on
of way acqui-
291,750 F
Hopper Road east of Pit. Auburn Road.
sition and
389,000
97,250 E
construction
This project provides for reconstruction of Hopper Road
Design and
90,000 F
Hopper Road
from just west of the Hawthorne School property to
construction
120,000
30,000 E
Mt. Auburn Road.
— 4 —
CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986-R7
1987-P8
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPM1"NT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EOITIPMENT $
316,500 F
14AINTENANCE $
OTHER $
105,500 E
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSFTTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT S
217,800 F
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
72,600 E
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EOUIPMENT $
151,500 F
'1A.INTENANCE $
OTHER $
50,500 I
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
300,000 F
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT
100,000"E
MAINTENANCE $
OTHFR $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
291,750 F
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $ .
97,250 E
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
90,000 F
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER S
30,000 E
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS : $
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEMPROJECT
DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
This project provides for the continued development of
Design, right
50,000 J
Lexington Street
Lexington as a collector street running east and west
of way acqui-
1,694,000
1,300,000 B
across the north part of the City.
sition and
344 000 I
construction
Traffic Signal at
This item provides for the installation of a phased
Mt. Auburn Road and
traffic signal at the intersection of Mt. Auburn Road
Design and
53,000
53,000 J
Independence Street
and Independence Street.
construction
Traffic Signal at
This project provides for the installation of a phased
Perryville Road and
traffic signal at the intersection of Perryville Road
Design and
52,000'
52,000 J
Cape Rock Drive
and Cape Rock Drive.
construction
This project provides for a continuing major street
Street Overlay
overlay program which will extend the useable life
Construction
300,000
240,000 J
of these streets.
60,000 I
This is another continuing major street maintenance
Street Sealing
program to provide for the sealing of local and
Construction
750,000
750,000 I
collector asphalt streets.
Sidewalks
This project provides for the repair of existing side -Design
and
250,000
125,000 J
walks and the potential construction of new sidewalks.
construction
125,000 I
This project provides for the widening of Broadway from
Design, right
BroadwayImprovement
p
West. End Boulevard to Kingshighway (State Route 61).
of way acqui-
950,000
950,000 B
This provides for 4 lanes, utility relocation, street
sition and
lights and landscaping.
construction
CAPITAL BUDGET
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1983-84
FISCAL YEAR
1984-85
FISCAL YEAR
1985-86
FISCAL YEAR
1986-R7
FISCAL YEAR
1987-RR
FISCAL YEAR
RECURRING ANNUAL
EXPENSE (000's)
RELATED CAPITAL
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIP11ENT
$
50,000
T
100,000
B
400,000
B
400,000
B
400,000
B
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
64,000
I
100,000
I
100,000
I
80,000
I
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EOITIPPIENT
$
53,000
J
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
S
52,000
J
MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
$
$
OTHER
TOTAL
$
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EOU IPIIENT
$
40,000
10,000
J
I
80,000
20,000
J
I
40,000
10,000
J
I
40,000
10,000
J
I.
40,000
10,000
J
I
MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
$
$
OTHER
TOTAL
$
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EOUIPWNT
$
150,000
I
150,000
I
150,000
I
150,000
I
150,000
I
MAINTENANCE
$
OTNFR
$
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSFTTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
$
25,000
25,000
J
I.
25,000
25,000
J
I
25,000
25,000
J
I
25,000
25,000
J
I
25,000
25,000
J
I
MAINTENANCE
$
$
OTHER
TOTAL
$TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIP)fF.NT
$
475,000
B
475,000
B
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS $
- 7 -
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
West End Boulevard
This project provides for the reconstruction of North
Design and
Improvement
West End Boulevard from Rose Street to Bertling Street
958,000
958,000 B
with new surface, drainage and curb and gutters.
construction
Design, right
Wilson Road Bridge
This project provides for the replacement of the bridge
of way acqui-
350,000
350,000 B
on Wilson Road.
sition and
construction
William Street
This project provides for the reconstruction and widening
Design and
Improvement
of William Street from Sprigg Street to Main Street.
construction
230,000
230,000 B
Airport - Handicap,,
Provide handicapped facilities in terminal, install 8"
Design and
105,876 F
Overlayand Updated ALP
windcone on Runway 28, strengthen overlay of South 2-20
construction
125,600
19,724 A
and update ALP'.
Safety Extension
Elimination of drainage problem would enhance safety of
Design and
1.29,960 F
Runway 10
larger aircraft. (This is currently not a safety problem
construction
144,400
14,440 A
to.small aircraft.)
Parallel Taxiway
Last remaining parallel taxiway to Runway 10 has not
Design and
490,500 F
Runway 10
been completed. The objective is to make air traffic
construction
545,000
54,500 A
on and along Runway 10 as safe as possible.
Land Acquisition
Acquisition of 4 acres between highway right-of-way and
Runway 20 Clear Zone
presently owned clear zone. Objective is to protect
Acquisition
25,000
22,500 F
integrity of clear zone and insure safe access.
2,500 A
BERM
CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL I11PROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL OPFRATING BUDGET IMPACT
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-R8
R.ECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
958,000 B
11AINTENANGE $
TOTAL. $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: .$
STAFF ( ) $
EOUI.PMENT $
14AINTENANCE $
OTHER $
350,000 B
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQIJIP14ENT S
230,000 B
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
105,876 F
19,724 A
111AI.NTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
HOUIPIfFNT $
129,960 F
MAINTENANCE $
OTHFR $
14,440 A
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EnUIPMIENT $
'490,500 F
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
54,500 A
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
22,500 F
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER 8
2,500 A
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS : $
-9 -
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
Objective is to strengthen Taxiway F And correct profile
UNIT OF WORK
Design
TOTAL, COST
FINANCING
22,500 F
Reconstruction Taxiway F
and drainage problems.
and
25,000
Construction
2,500 A
Reconstruction - T
Objective is to provide adequate strength and correct
Design
22,500 F
Hanger Taxiways
profile and drainage problems.
and
25,000
Construction
2,500 A
Belleridge Pike
This project provides for the final construction of the
92,400
92,400 J
remaining 280 feet of a street in Woodland Hills Estates..
Lombardo Drive
This project provides for the reconstruction of 530 feet
42,000
42,000 I
of Lombardo Drive.
Kingshighway &
320,000
240,000 F
Independence Street
80,000 I
Intersection
96,164 A
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION
8,754,800
3,788,000 B
405,350 E
2,401;386 F
1,451,500 I
612,400 J
- 10 -
CAPITAL BUDGET
CAPITAL
IlTROVEMPNT PROGFAM.
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986-R7
1987 -RR
RECURRING
ANNUAL
RELATED
CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCNASFS
(000'x)
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
S
22,500
F
MAINTENANCE
$
OTI}FR
$
2,500
A
TOTAL,
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: S
t
STAFF ( )
$
F.OUI.PMRNT
$
MINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
22,500
F
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
2,500
A
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
}
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
S
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$ (�
92,400
J
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
42,000
I
MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
$
$
OTHER
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EOUlvttFNT
$
240,000-F
MAINTENANCE
$
OTNFR
$
80.000
I
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
19,724 A
105,500 E
573,876 F
235,500 I
68,940
450,000
72,600
838,260
A
B
E
F
7,500
400,000
100,000
607,500
A
B
E
F
875 000 B
97,250 E
291,750 F
285,000 I
Z,0639000 B
>
30,000 E
90,000 F
265,000 I
STAFF ( )
MAINTENANCE
TOTAL
$
$
$
EQUIPMENT
OTHER
TOTAL
#
$
S
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: S
115,000 J
301,000 I
365,000 I
65,000 J
65,000 J
157,000
J
210,400
J
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
$
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
S
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS : $
FISCAL 1983-1988
HEALTH
AND
SAFETY
11 -
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
HEALTH AND SAFETY
These projects provide for bringing the ventilation
Renovation
Police Department
system in the indoor firing range within required
and
22,000
11,000 G
Building Renovation
standards, relocation of certain building facilities
11,000 A
and replacement of certain compressor units.
Maintenance
Disaster Warning
Implement a city wide warning system consisting of
Design and
250,000
250,000 B
System
various pole mounted sirens.
Installation
Site Acqui-
West Side
Provides for the relocation of the current Fire
sition,
Fire Station
Station #2 to the west part of the city.
Design and
217,000
217,000 B
Construction
Platform Aerial
This piece of equipment would replace a 33 year old
fire vehicle and substantially upgrade the equipment
Acquisition
350,000
350,000 B
Fire Truck
capability of the department.
11,000 A
TOTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY
839,000
817,000 B
11,000 G
CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL OPFRATING BUDGET IMPACT
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-R8
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT S
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EOITIPMENT $
4,250 G
4,250 A
3,000 G
3,000 A
3,750 G
3,750 A
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT S
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
250,000 B
TOTAL $
TOTAL
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
217,000 B
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT S
350,000-B
MAINT.FNANCE $
OTHFR $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
7
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF $
( )
EnUIPMENT $
4,250 A
3,000 A
3,750 A
14AINTENAITCE $
OTHER $
467,000 B
4,250 G
350,000 B
3,000 G
3,750 G
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS $
FISCAL 1983-1988
E M V I R 0 N M E N T
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
STAFF ESTIMATES
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
ENVIRONMENT
Waste Water
Treatment Plant
Improvement
Sand blast and paint the top and sides of the Trickling
Filter System and replace links and bolts on the primary
purifier to prevent deterioration from rust and to comply
with federal regulations to maintain system.
Reconstruction
65,000
65,000 C
Landfill
Opening a new landfill site and closing the existing site
in accordance with DNR requirements. This site will
include an outdoor firing range.
Engineering
Design and
Construction
200,000
200,000 G
College and Henderson
Reconstruct this outfall sanitary sewer in order to
comply with DNR requirements.
Engineering
Design and
Construction
1,299,080
129,008 C
1,170,072 F
Outfall Sewer
Sanitary Sewer
Trunk Line
Kingshighway to Themis
This project provides for the completion of an 18"
sanitary sewer relief line.
Construction
240,000
240,000 C
Sanitary Sewer
Trunk Line
Commercial Street to
This project provides for a 27" sanitary sewer line
which will provide the necessary capacity in the
intermediate Cape La Croix drainage area.
Design and
Construction
1,360,000
1,360,000 C
Hawthorne Pump Station
Sanitary Sewer Trunk
This project provides for a 27", 24", and 10" sanitary
sewer line to serve various portions of the upper Cape
La Croix drainage area.
Design and
Construction
1,368,000
1,368,000 C
Line Hawthorne Pump
Station to North and
North West
— 14 —
CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL OPF..RATING BUDGET IMPACT
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987—R$
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
E0117PMFNT $
65,000 C
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT S
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
200,000 G
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
129,008 C
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
1,170,072 F
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EOUIPIfFNT $
240,000 C
MAINTENANCE $
OTHFR $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
1,360,000 C
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPM.ENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
1,368,000 C
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS $
- 15 -
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
STAFF ESTIMATES
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
4,532,080
3,162,008 C
1,170,072 F
200,000 G
CAPITAL BUDGET
- 16 -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986--R7
1957 -RR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
Y1
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT ��
RECURRING ANNUAL RELATED CAPITAL Ij
EXPENSE (000's) PURCNASFS (000's)
S'T'AFF ( ) $ EQUIPMENT S
1,600,000 C 1,433,000 C 129,008 C MAINTENANCE $ OT1lFR $
200,000 G 1,1700072 F TOTAL. $ TOTA, $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ E01TIPMFNT
PRAINTENANCE $ OTHER
TOTAL $ TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ EQUIPMI?NT $
MAINTENANCE $ OTHER $
TOTAL $ TOTAL
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ EQUIPMENT
MAINTFNANCE $ OTHER $
TOTAL $ 1 TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $ EOUI°MFNT $
MAINTENANCE $ OT11FR $
TOTAL $ 1 TOTAL $
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER $
TOTAL
$
TOTAI. $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $ EQUIPMFNT $
MAINTENANCE $ OTHER S
TOTAL $ TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS : $
0
FISCAL 1983-1988
REC_REAT I QN
AND
LEISURE
TIRE
- 17 -
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF 14ORK
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
RECREATION AND
LEISURE TIME
Reconstruction of the road surface with a 4" asphalt sur -
Cherokee Park
face, 20'wide
Construction
75,600
75,600 B
Arena Park
Reconstruction of the east boundary road with a 4" asphalt
Construction
61,500
61,500 B
surface, 20" wide.
Shawnee Park
Reconstruction of the road surface with a 4" asphalt sur-
Construction
70,000
70,000 B
face, 20" wide
25,000 A
Riverfront Development
Construction of a passive ark area with a spectator
P P � p
25,000 J
amphitheater on the river front in the downtown area.
Construction
230,000
135,000 F
45,000 B
Municipal Golf Course
Design
New club house and cart storage combination building,
and
177,000
177,000 B
Club House
parking lot, furniture and equipment.
Construction
Municipal Golf Course
Design
Storage Building
AdJition to existing building used for equipment main-
and
16,000
16,000 H
tenance and storage.
Construction
- 18 -
CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1983-84
FISCAL YEAR
1984-85
FISCAL YEAR
1985-86
FISCAL YEAR
1986-A7
FISCAL YEAR
1987 -AR
FISCAL YEAR.
RECURRING ANNUAL
EXPENSE (000's)
RELATED CAPITAL
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMFNT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL. $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: .$
STAFF ( ) $
EOVI.PMFNT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
75,600 B
TOTAL $
TOTAL. $
OFFSFTTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT S
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
61,500 B
TOTAL . $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
70,000 B
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHFR $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
25,000 A
56,250 F
78,750 F
STAFF ( ) $
MAINT.FNkNCF $
FOUIPMENT 8
OTHFR $
25,000 J
18,750 B
26,250 B
�
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSFTTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
177,000 B
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
16,000 J
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER S
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS $
- 19 -
PROPOSED PROJECTS
STAFF ESTIMATES
PROJECT
TOTAL COST
FINANCING
NiMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
Completion of front and back nine water systems with a
Municipal Golf Course
complete automated system. Reseeding of fairways,
Design and
165,000
165,000 B
Water System
dredging lake on 410 and building new lake between
Construction
#1 and #2 fairway to support water supply.
Tree Development
Five year program of tree maintenance and planting,
Implementation
40,000
40,000 C-
Program
development of nursery program and hiring of a forester.
Reconstruction and periodic maintenance of this storm
Capaha Park Lagoon
water retention area. Provide greater access with a
Design and
140,000
140,000 B
Improvement
paved walkway, retard further erosion and improve.
Construction
general aesthetics.
Ballfields
Provides for the construction of ballfields with grass
Construction
4,700
4,700 G
areas and backstops in Cherokee and Shawnee Parks.
Provides for the construction of courts for basketball
Construction
32,000
32,000 B
Ball Courts
and other court games in Cherokee, Groves and Shawnee
Parks.
Park Shelters
This item will provide for additional park shelters
Design and
8,000
87000 B
in Cherokee and Shawnee Parks.
Construction
Provides for the installation of a major piece of
Park Play Areas
sculptured play equipment in one park per year. The
Installation
75,D00
75,000 G
configuration in each park will be unique in itself.
wit=
CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL OPFRATING BUDGET IMPACT
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986--A7
1987-R8
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCHASES (000's)
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
165,000 B
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EOTTIPMFNT $
6,000 G
7,000 G
8,000 G
9,000 G
10,000 G
14AINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT S
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
140,000 B
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OT11ER $
4,700 G
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EOUIPMFNT $
32,000 B
MAINTENANCE. $
OTHFR $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSFTTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
4,000 B
4,000 B
14AINT. ENANV, - $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER S
15,000 G
15,000 G
15,000 G
15,000 G
15,000 G
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS : $
- 21 -
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATES
NUMBER.
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF 14ORK
TOTAL, COST
FINANCING
Dennis Scivally Park
Restroom
This project provides for the construction of a restroom
facility to serve this park area.
Design
and
6,200
6,200 B
Construction
Arena Park Recreation
This project will allow for the major expansion of the
recreation program with the building of an 80' x 120'
structure for a multiplicity of year around recreational
Design
and
Construction
300,000
300,000 B
Building
uses.
Tennis Courts
This item provides for the construction of 6 lighted, high
grade, tennis -courts. Four located in Cherokee Park and
Design
and
75,000
75,000 B
two in Shawnee Park.
Construction
Small Neighborhood Park
This provides for the potential development of a prototype
small neighborhood park. It could consist of one or two
Acquisition,
Design and
20,000
20,000 B
lots in size and use as a combination passive or active
Construction
play area.
25,000 A
TOTAL RECREATION AND LEISURE ACTIVITIES
1,496,000
1,175,300 B
135,000 F
119,700 G
41,000 J
-22—
CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT I
I,
1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-R7 M7 -R$ RECURRING ANNUAL I RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR EXPENSE (OOO's) PURCNASFS (000'x) f'
25,000 A
21,000 G
25,000 J
426,850 B
56,250 F
26,700 G
6,200 B
75,000 B
20,000 B
448,450.E
78,750 F
23,000 G
300,000 B
300,000 B
24,000 G
16,000 J
25,000 G
STAFF ( )
$
SAVINGS: $
EOUIPM)'.NT S
11AINTENANCE
$
OT11FR
$
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
7
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
i
STAFF ( )
$
COST
F.OUIPMFNT
$
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
TOTAL
$
TOTAL,
$
OFFSFTTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
r
STAFF ( )
$
COST
EQUIPP?ENT
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
1
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )'$
EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EOUIDtiFNT
$
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHFR
$
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING
COST
SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( )
$
EQUIPMENT
$
MAINTENANCE
$
OTHER
$
TOTAL
$
TOTAL
$
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: fi
STAFF ( ) $ EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $ OTHER S
TOTAL $ TOTAL S
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS : $
FISCAL 1983-1988
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
- 23 -
PROPOSED PROJECTS
PROJECT
STAFF ESTIMATFS
NUMBER
IMPROVEMENT ITEM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
UNIT OF WORK
TOTAL, COST
FINANCTNC
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
To construct a multi --use building jointly with Southeast
Multi -Use BuildingMissouri
State University. It is anticipated that approx-
Design and
5,000,000
5,000,000 B
-imately $8,000,000 will be provided. by the State of
Missouri through designated funds from the state wide
Construction
capital improvement bond issue.
Florsheim Shoe Com an
�' y
Reconstruction of South West -End Boulevard from State
Design and
268,700
268,700 D
-�
Economic Development'
Route 74 to Linden Street and the reconstruction of a
Construction
Project
portion of Linden Street to accommodate heavy commercial
traffic.
South Cape Neighborhood
This project provides for housing rehabilitation and
Rehabilitatio
, 314,415
314,415 D
street reconstruction in an -area bounded by College Street,
Design and
Restoration Project
Cape La Croix Creek, Elm Street and Pacific Street.
Construction
Community Development
Provides for annual grants to assist in the reconstruction
Rehabilitatio
, 2,000,000
2,000,000 D
and rehabilitation of various public works and structural
Design and
Block Grant Projects
-- r
related items.
Construction
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
7,583,115
.5,000,000 B
2,583,115 D
•
i
i
- 24 -
CAPITAI, BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986--R7
].9P7 -PP
RECURRING ANNUAL
RELATED CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
FISCAL YEAR
'FISCAL YEAR
EXPENSE (000's)
PURCNASFS (000's)
1.
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT S i
MAINTENANCE $
OTIIFR $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EOPIPMENT $
14AINTENANCE $
OTHER 1
5,000,000 B
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OPFSFTTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF'( ) $
EQUIPMENT S
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
268,700 D
TOTAL $
TOTAL
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT
TIAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
314,415 D
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EOUIDNFNT S
500,000 D
500v000.D
5009000 D
500,000 D
MAINTENANCE $
OT]iFR $
TOTAL $
TOTAL $
OFFSFTTING COST SAVINGS: $
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
5,000,000 B
583,115 D
500,000 D
500,000 D
500,000 D
500,000 D
MAINTENANCE $
TOTAL $
OTHER $
TOTAL S
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS: S
STAFF ( ) $
EQUIPMENT $
MAINTENANCE $
OTHER $
TOTAL $
TOTAL S
OFFSETTING COST SAVINGS $ �'
FISCAL 1983-1988
TABLES
SUMMARY OF RECOIRIENDED CAPITAL IMPROVPP1ENT PROCRA11
Table I EXPENDITURES 1983-1988 BY PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND SOURCE OF FUNDS
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (I.J)
GENERAL
GENERAL
REVENUE
STATE
MOTOR FUEL
FEDERAL
REVENUE
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
FUND
REVENUES
OBLIGATION
BONDS
BONDS
GRANTS
CAX RECEIPTS
GRANTS
SHARING
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT (1)
OTHER
TOTAI.
.EXECUTIVE AND
AD.[INISTRATIVE SERVICES
228,600
228,600
TRANSPORTATION
96,164
39788,000
405,350
2,401,386
1,451,500 (I)
8,754,800
612 ,4n0 (J)
HEALTH AND SAFETY
11,000
817,000
11,000
839,000
ENVIROMENT
3,162,008
1,170,072
200,000
4,532,080
RECREATION AND
LEISURE TIME
25,000
1,175,300
135,000
119,700
419000 (J)
19496,000
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
5,0009000
2,583,115
7,583,115
TOTAL
360,764
10,780,300
3,1629008
2,583,115
405,350
3.706,458
330,700
1,451,500 (I)
23,433,595
6539400 (J)
Table II
- 26 -
SUMMARY OF FUNDING SOURCES BY FISCAL YEAR 1983-88
SOURCE OF FUNDS
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
Total
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
79,724
160,890
36,700
42,050
41,400
360,764
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
5,000,000
1043,850
1,198,450
1,175,000
2,063,000
10,780,300
REVENUE BONDS
1,600,000
1,433,000
129,008
3,162,008
STATE GRANTS
583,115
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
2,583,115
MOTOR FUEL TAX RECEIPTS
105,500
72,600
100,000
97,250
30,000
405,350
FEDERAL GRANTS
573,876
894,510
686,250
1,461,822
90,000
3,706,458
REVENUE SHARING
221,000
30,950
26,000
27,750
25,000
330,700
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
AND
OTHER
235,500
140,000
301,000
157,000
365,000
210,400
285,000
81,000
265,000
65,000
1,451,500
653,400
TOTAL
81,538,715
4,893,800
3,122,800
3,798,880
3,079,400
23,433,595